Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of the Current Measures of Theory of Mind in Adults with Schizophrenia
Next Article in Special Issue
Pattern of Use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) among the Chronically Ill: A Health Information National Trend Survey (HINTS) Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship between Prenatal or Postnatal Exposure to Pesticides and Obesity: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nurse-Coordinated Blood Pressure Telemonitoring for Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(13), 7171; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137171
by Honoria Ocagli 1, Giulia Lorenzoni 1, Corrado Lanera 1, Alessandro Schiavo 2, Livio D’Angelo 2, Alessandro Di Liberti 2, Laura Besola 3, Giorgia Cibin 4, Matteo Martinato 1, Danila Azzolina 1,5, Augusto D’Onofrio 4, Giuseppe Tarantini 2, Gino Gerosa 4, Ester Cabianca 6 and Dario Gregori 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(13), 7171; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137171
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 28 June 2021 / Accepted: 29 June 2021 / Published: 4 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue eHealth in Chronic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript describes the feasibility and acceptability of using commercial WDs in elderly patients undergoing trans catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) will be explored. This research includes data collection, validated questionnaires and statistical analysis, etc. Experimental results show that the use of a WD is accepted in our frail population for an extended period. However the following issues should be addressed before it could be published.

Detailed Comments:

  1. There are more spaces at the beginning of line 45.
  2. Title 2.3 and 2.5-2.8 have format error and should not be bold.
  3. Title 6.1 on line 336 should not appear here.
  4. Space is required at the beginning of line 265.
  5. The reference on line 277 is incorrectly marked.
  6. Please explain the meaning of the number in the text box in Figure 2, 3, 4.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the careful consideration and overall positive judgement given to our work.

Detailed Comments:

There are more spaces at the beginning of line 45.

Modified.


Title 2.3 and 2.5-2.8 have format error and should not be bold.

Modified.


Title 6.1 on line 336 should not appear here.

Modified
Space is required at the beginning of line 265.

Modified
The reference on line 277 is incorrectly marked.

Modified.
Please explain the meaning of the number in the text box in Figure 2, 3, 4.

Thanks for the suggestion. Modified.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well-articulated research article. The authors presented a feasibility study on the use of a wearable device to evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical interventions such as TAVR and SAVR. I have no major comments.

Minor comments:

Line 28: Half of the patients were willing to continue using the device.  

Author Response

Reviewer 2:

This is a well-articulated research article. The authors presented a feasibility study on the use of a wearable device to evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical interventions such as TAVR and SAVR. I have no major comments.

We thank the reviewer for the careful consideration and overall positive judgement given to our work.

Minor comments:

Line 28: Half of the patients were willing to continue using the device.  

Thanks for the suggestion, modified.

Back to TopTop