Next Article in Journal
Maternal Sociodemographic Factors and Antenatal Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Ten Thousand-Fold Higher than Acceptable Bacterial Loads Detected in Kenyan Hospital Environments: Targeted Approaches to Reduce Contamination Levels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 13
10.3390/ijerph18136811
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Ethnic Identity and Well-Being of Andean Indigenous People: The Effect of Individualistic and Collectivist Value Orientations

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(13), 6811; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136811
by Andrés Gutiérrez-Carmona 1,*, Alfonso Urzúa 2 and Karina Rdz-Navarro 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(13), 6811; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136811
Submission received: 20 May 2021 / Revised: 8 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 25 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present an interesting study on the relationships between ethnic identity and well-being in the Lickan-Antay ethnic group based on questionnaries with several questions regarding well-being, ethnic identity and collectivist and individualistic value orientations. They conclude that collectivist and individualistic motivational patterns justifies the relationship between ethnic identity and well-being

The research fits with the profile of the journal but in order the manuscript become a paper for IJERPH it needs several changes and corrections.

Abstract: remember that in a abstract there are no references. Take out the three references that appears there. Should then rearrange all the references. At the same time, the abstract is drafted separating objectives, methods, results... for this journal it should be written without this kind of separators. 

Material and methods: I don't understand the block 2.1. I think that is not necessary.  The intentional snowball sampling that at the end yields 395 respondents should be explained in detail. The block instruments should contain subsections with numbers 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.3.3,... 

Results: add a frame in fig. 1.  Match paragraph of lines 239-240 with the next (lines 241-245). 

That all, congratulations for the research.

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Results are not presented clearly in the paper and it is difficult to see how the conclsions are supported by the results.
  2. I would recommend the authors to describe ten basic values more coherently and in conjunction with traditional beliefs and values of Andean native peoples

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The study is well designed, the methodology is clearly explained and the results are clearly presented. 

Although I find this paper very interesting and well written, I have several suggestions:

  • the literature review should explain intimately the research gap; what is new in this study?
  • the discussion should be extended,
  • authors should more clearly describe their input into science. 

Author Response

Consulte el archivo adjunto.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop