Associations of Relative Humidity and Lifestyles with Metabolic Syndrome among the Ecuadorian Adult Population: Ecuador National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-ECU) 2012
1
Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Facultad de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170525, Ecuador
3
Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
4
Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(23), 9023; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239023
Submission received: 21 October 2020
/
Revised: 21 November 2020
/
Accepted: 1 December 2020
/
Published: 3 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change Adaption for Public Health)
Abstract
:The effects of the physical environment on metabolic syndrome (MetS) are still largely unexplained. This study aimed to analyze the associations of relative humidity of residence, lifestyles, and MetS among Ecuadorian adults. Data from 6024 people aged 20 to 60 years were obtained from an Ecuador national population-based health and nutrition survey (i.e., ENSANUT-ECU, 2012) and the mean annual relative humidity (%) from the Ecuador National Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (2012). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for MetS according to groups of relative humidity were calculated using multiple logistic regression. Living in high relative humidity (>80%) increased ORs of reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (1.25; 95 % CI, 1.06–1.56) and MetS (OR = 1.20; 95 % CI,1.01–1.42) in women. Furthermore, physically active men living in high relative humidity showed lower OR of elevated triglycerides (0.56; 95 % CI,0.37–0.85) while menopausal women living in high relative humidity showed increased ORs of MetS (5.42; 95 % CI, 1.92–15.27), elevated blood pressure (3.10; 95 % CI, 1.15–8.35), and increased waist circumference (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI, 1.09–1.63). Our results show that residence in high relative humidity and menopausal status increase ORs of MetS and its components in Ecuadorian women; however, physical activity significantly reduces the OR of elevated triglycerides in men. The obtained findings may help make public health policies regarding environmental humidity management, nutritional education, menopausal care, and physical activity promotion to prevent the onset of MetS among Ecuadorian adults.
1. Introduction
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is comprised of elevated fasting glucose, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and abdominal obesity [1] and can lead to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), heart disease, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [2]. Over a billion people of the world population are estimated to have MetS [3]; in Latin American countries, a higher prevalence is observed, especially in women [4]. Human biology, lifestyle, and the environment have been found to promote the onset of MetS, though the specific causes are still unknown [5]. Like other Latin American countries, 31.2% of adults in Ecuador have MetS and approximately 85% of the total population have at least one of the MetS abnormalities [6]. Ischemic heart disease, DM2, and CVD were the top three causes of mortality in the Ecuadorian adult population in 2019 (3.1%, 6.5%, and 6.2% of the annual total mortality, respectively) [7]. Therefore, it is important to identify potential determinants of MetS development in Ecuador to set up strategies to minimize MetS onset as well as its subsequent diseases.
Biological factors (i.e., sex (female) and age (>40 years old)) and lifestyle patterns (i.e., smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy dietary habits, and physical inactivity) are recognized as risk factors for MetS development. In addition, physical environments, including elevation and climatic factors, have been reported to be associated with onset of metabolic diseases [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Among several physical environments, humidity is the most debated due to its inconsistent results in human health studies [16].
Humidity is linked to physiological responses through heat stress and hydration states [17]. Despite the importance of humidity on human body metabolism, it is rarely incorporated as an independent variable in many research studies. Rather, humidity is considered a confounding variable that may be related to the exposure and/or health outcomes [18]. Studies supporting the association of metabolic disorders and humidity are limited; however, a few studies showed that mortality in the USA tends to increase in hot and humid areas [19]. The less humid mountainous regions on the other hand showed the lowest prevalence of obesity (<30%) and MetS (30–35%) compared to the rest of the country [20]. Another study showed a positive association between diabetes mellitus, central obesity, higher systolic blood pressure, and lower physical activity in elder residents of the Mediterranean islands living in high relative humidity areas [21]. In addition, sociodemographic characteristics, epidemiological transition, globalization, and changes in lifestyle patterns (i.e., reduced physical activity and increased consumption of macronutrients and alcohol, and smoking) may modify these associations [6,22].
We hypothesized that relative humidity is associated with risk of MetS and that lifestyle patterns could modify the risk. To this end, we determined the associations of relative humidity, lifestyles, and dietary patterns with MetS among Ecuadorian adults based on data from the ENSANUT-ECU 2012 and the National Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (INAMHI).
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design
A cross-sectional study was performed using ENSANUT-ECU, a nation-wide population-based health and nutrition survey conducted by the Ecuadorian Government and its Ministry of Public Health. Detailed explanations of the study design and data source profiles of ENSANUT-ECU are available elsewhere [23]. In brief, ENSANUT-ECU collected data that included sociodemographic characteristics of the population, housing, risk factors, food consumption, anthropometry, blood pressure, and nutritional biomarkers.
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants using consent forms, and a protocol of the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University (code: SNU 19–04–003, date: 13 May 2019).
2.2. Subjects
A total of 11,044 participants over 20 years of age was initially included for ENSANUT-ECU with complete variables related to MetS. Among these individuals, we excluded 4166 rural residents who did not have physical activity data and other risk factors (n = 493) as well as participants who took medication for hypertension (n = 361). Thus, 6024 adult Ecuadorians (1964 men and 4060 women) were finally included in this study, as illustrated in Figure 1.
2.3. General Characteristics
The general information of participants, including age, sex, ethnicity, education level, and economic status of family, was collected from the housing questionnaire of ENSANUT-ECU 2012. Data regarding elevation of residence was also obtained. Ethnicity was classified as mestizo (Indian with European mix) and others (i.e., indigenous, montubio, afro-descendent, and white); education level was classified as primary, secondary, and college or higher; and economic status of family was classified as poor (Q1), middle (Q2 and Q3), and rich (Q4 and Q5). For menopause status, we subdivided women in two groups: menopausal stage “yes” for ≥50 years of age and “no” for <50 years old. This classification was based on the WHO parameters.
2.4. Lifestyles
Information regarding lifestyles was included as follows: current alcohol consumption and smoking (“yes” or “no”) were based on alcohol beverage intake and smoking in the past 30 days according to the United States National Survey on Drug Use and Health and WHO-Ecuador [24]. Physical activity was divided in two groups: “yes” for the performance of vigorous-intensity activity for at least 1 h 15 min, moderate-intensity activity for at least 2 h 30 min, or both for the past 7 days prior to the collection of data, and “no” for any activity that that took less than 1 h 15 min [25].
2.5. Anthropometric Measurements
Anthropometric measurements, including body mass index (BMI), height, weight, and waist circumference of participants, were performed at their residence by trained technicians using standardized procedures and portable equipment [26]. Blood pressure was measured twice using a sphygmomanometer according to standardized measurement techniques [26]; the mean of the readings was used in this study. Blood samples of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were collected from participants under an 8-h fasting period and measured using an enzymatic-colorimetric assay Modular Evo-800 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The Friedewald’s formula was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol [27]. Detailed explanations of the laboratory procedures are reported in the ENSANUT-ECU [23].
2.6. Dietary Intake
For dietary intakes, trained technicians collected data using the 1-day 24-h dietary recall method at the participants’ houses. The daily energy intake was calculated using the food composition table of the Food Dietary Guidelines for the Ecuadorian population (GABA) [28]. Analyses of calorie intake and estimated energy requirements (EER), according to age-, sex-, weight-, height- and physical activity level-specific equations were included in our study [29,30].
2.7. Relative Humidity
The mean annual relative humidity (%) of the urban area for 2012 was obtained from the National Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology INAMHI [31] and was used as a proxy for relative humidity at the participants’ cities of residence in order to assess the long-term association of ambient humidity with metabolic dysfunction. Areas above 80% were categorized as high relative humidity, and the rest were categorized as low-humidity areas. This categorization was based on the assumption that relative humidity above 80% is considered high and causes thermal discomfort and adverse health outcomes in hot-humid tropics [21,32,33], as in the case in Ecuador.
2.8. Metabolic Syndrome
The diagnosis of MetS was based on the harmonized guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and the Latin American Diabetes Association as the presence of three or more of the following components: waist circumference (men ≥ 94 cm and women ≥ 88), blood pressure (systolic ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 85 mmHg), HDL cholesterol (men < 40 mg/dL and women < 50 mg/dL), elevated triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL), or fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dL).
2.9. Statistical Analyses
All analyses were stratified by sex and relative humidity, with data presented as percentages or means with standard errors depending on the type of analysis. Differences in groups were compared using Chi-square and t-tests depending on the variable that was analyzed. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MetS across the relative humidity groups were estimated using multiple logistic regression analysis. In the regression model, general and sociodemographic variables (age, ethnicity, economic status, and education level), anthropometric measurements (BMI, except for the model of waist circumference), lifestyles (physical activity, current alcohol consumption, current smoking, and total energy intake), elevation of residence, and menopausal status were considered. Statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0.05 in a two-tailed manner. Statistical analyses were performed using the PROC SURVEY procedures of SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) [34].
3. Results
The analyzed characteristics of the participants according to sex and relative humidity are shown in Table 1. The mean ages of participants were 34.6 ± 0.44 (SE) for men and 35.2 ± 0.35 years of age for women. A significant difference between groups was found in the following variables: ethnicity, economic status, education level, physical activity, elevation, and ambient temperature of residence (p < 0.05). However, age and smoking were significantly different in women only (p = 0.0332, p < 0.0001, respectively).
Table 2 shows that men had higher levels of blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and energy intake, whereas women had higher BMI and EER (%). BMI was significantly different in women in the high relative humidity group only (p = 0.0461). Both sexes showed higher HDL cholesterol in high relative humidity (men p = 0.0278; women p = 0.0146). Additionally, in the high relative humidity sex groups, a significant increase of energy intake and EER (%) was observed (p < 0.05).
The prevalence and ORs for MetS according to relative humidity are presented in Table 3. Living in high relative humidity had effects on women only; they showed significant ORs of having reduced HDL cholesterol (1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.56) and MetS (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01–1.42) after adjusting for confounders.
Table 4 shows that current alcohol consumption and smoking enhanced increase of ORs of reduced HDL cholesterol and elevated triglycerides in women residing in high humidity (compared to Table 3). Interestingly, physically active men living in high relative humidity showed significantly lower ORs of elevated triglycerides (0.59; 95 % CI, 0.37–0.85).
Additionally, ORs for MetS in women according to their menopausal status and relative humidity of residence are presented in Table 5. Menopausal women living in high relative humidity showed increased ORs of MetS (5.42; 95 % CI, 1.92–15.27), elevated blood pressure (3.10; 95 % CI, 1.15–8.35), and increased waist circumference (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI, 1.09–1.63) compared to women without menopause.
4. Discussion
This study showed a positive association between relative humidity and MetS as well as reduced HDL cholesterol in women. Menopausal women living in high relative humidity showed higher ORs of MetS, elevated blood pressure, and increased waist circumference. Moreover, physically active men living in high relative humidity had lower OR of elevated triglycerides compared to physically inactive men living in the same humidity. To our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest that relative humidity is associated with MetS in an adult population using nationally representative data.
The prevalence of MetS in adult Ecuadorians shows similar trends with other Latin American countries and the USA [4,21]. However, higher OR of MetS in populations living in high relative humidity has never been reported before. An approximation to this finding could be observed in a study in the USA, where high relative humidity states presented a higher prevalence of MetS, obesity, and DM2 [21].
To further explore our findings, we performed additional analyses of MetS abnormalities, lifestyle patterns, and relative humidity. In women who reside in high relative humidity, who consume alcohol, and who smoke, higher ORs of reduced HDL cholesterol and physical inactivity increased the OR of MetS. These lifestyle factors could play moderating roles in MetS. Apart from the lack of previous studies on relative humidity and MetS, complementary research has investigated the effect of physical environment (i.e., humidity, temperature, elevation, radiation, etc.) on people’s health [19,35,36,37,38]. It was found that disparities in ambient temperature and relative humidity are associated with CVD [36], myocardial infarction morbidity and mortality [39,40], acute coronary syndrome [41,42], and DM2 [21].
Ecuador has four different geographical regions. The coast and the Galapagos Islands have the highest prevalence of MetS (35.0% and 41.9%, respectively), while the highlands and the Amazon have prevalence of 29.9% and 26.6%, respectively [6]. Each region has different environmental conditions and climatological patterns. According to Köppen’s climate classification, Ecuador has 11 different types of microclimates ranging from tropical to oceanic. Ecuador is situated on the equatorial line and thus produces little seasonality throughout the year: a warm rainy season lasts from January to April, with a cool and dry season from May through December [43]. The mean annual humidity in the coastal region is around 65%, while in the Amazon, it is around 85% [31]. The effects of high air humidity on human health are still controversial [44], and whether these climatological patterns may trigger MetS is difficult to answer here.
In order to identify a difference between sex, we analyzed sex and relative humidity individually. It was found that women living in high relative humidity had higher ORs of MetS and low HDL cholesterol. These pathophysiological differences may be explained by the effects of sexual hormones on the human body physiology [45,46]. The metabolism of lipids is modulated by endogenous sex hormones that might cause insulin resistance and abnormalities in the lipid profile [47]. Additionally, menopausal stage increased ORs of MetS, elevated blood pressure, and increased waist circumference in women living in high relative humidity compared to non-menopausal women living at the same humidity levels, indicating sex hormones may explain these differences. Several studies also revealed that menopause is associated with an increased risk of MetS and its components, which supports our outcomes [48,49,50].
Energy intake differed by sex and relative humidity (p < 0.05). This association suggested a regulatory role of hormones on appetite regulation and the onset of metabolic abnormalities. In contrast with our findings, other studies reported that exposure to high ambient temperatures and humidity under resting conditions caused poor appetite and reduced energy intake [51,52], which may be explained by some physiological factors such as reduced digestive enzyme activity and metabolic rate decrease [53].
Moreover, it has been proposed that an increase in relative humidity is associated with physical activity impairment [54,55]. Our findings indicate that physical activity is inversely associated with MetS and elevated triglycerides, similar to other studies that have shown a positive impact with exercise on cholesterol and triglyceride profile, abdominal obesity, and DM2 [56,57]. Several studies have described the benefits of physical activity on MetS and its components. However, the measurement of physical activity becomes difficult due to the use of different methods; thus, this should be considered when interpreting our results.
Alcohol consumption and current smoking were also associated with reduced HDL cholesterol in women living in high relative humidity areas. Some studies have shown that alcohol consumption has negative effects on the metabolism of glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides [58,59]. In addition, smoking has been shown to alter the lipids and lipoprotein metabolism. Smokers have also shown lower adjusted levels of HDL cholesterol than nonsmokers [60,61].
This study must be interpreted considering the following limitations. First, among initial participants (n = 11,044), physical activity data was collected only for the urban population; thus, we excluded rural residents (n = 4166) and others (n = 854), resulting in a total of 6024 urban participants included for this study. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility of residual bias, and our results should be interpreted with caution. Second, casual inferences were excluded due to its cross-sectional design. Third, we could not infer the individual’s usual energy intake using a 1-day 24-h dietary recall. Forth, missing data on leptin and/or irisin concentration, which may help to better elucidate the association between humidity and MetS, is another limitation of the study. Therefore, further studies in the fields of human biology and environment are needed to determine the influence of relative humidity on MetS in the adult population. Despite these limitations, we utilized data from the ENSANUT-ECU 2012 which was conducted on a nation-wide scale across the entire country using standardized protocols and instruments and is the only survey the collected all the required biomarkers for diagnosis of MetS. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first study determining the association of relative humidity with MetS in a nationally representative population sample.
5. Conclusions
Our study suggests that living in high relative humidity (>80%) increases ORs of MetS and reduces HDL cholesterol in women. Furthermore, menopausal status enhances increase in OR of MetS and augments ORs of elevated blood pressure and increased waist circumference, while performing physical activity decreases the OR of elevated triglycerides in men. These findings come from nation-wide data and highlight the importance of management of relative humidity and lifestyles in Ecuadorians. Intersectoral programs aimed at controlling relative humidity in homes and work environments, providing nutritional education and menopause care, and increasing physical activity are needed to promote healthy life conditions and to prevent metabolic disorders.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.F.J. and H.J.; methodology, C.F.J., Y.H.C., and H.J.; formal analysis, C.F.J., Y.H.C., and D.H.; investigation, C.F.J., and Y.H.C.; data curation, C.F.J. and D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F.J.; writing—review and editing, C.F.J., Y.H.C., and D.H.; supervision, Y.H.C. and H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
We especially thank to Ho Kim for his expert assistance with statistical analyses.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Alberti, K.G.; Zimmet, P.; Shaw, J. The metabolic syndrome-a new worldwide definition. Lancet 2005, 366, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassi, E.; Pervanidou, P.; Kaltsas, G.; Chrousos, G. Metabolic syndrome: Definitions and controversies. BMC Med. 2011, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saklayen, M.G. The Global Epidemic of the Metabolic Syndrome. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2018, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wong-McClure, R.A.; Gregg, E.W.; Barceló, A.; Lee, K.; Abarca-Gómez, L.; Sanabria-López, L.; Tortós-Guzmán, J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Central America: A cross-sectional population-based study. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2015, 38, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gosadi, I.M. Assessment of the environmental and genetic factors influencing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 2016, 37, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez-Galarza, J.; Baldeón, L.; Franco, O.H.; Muka, T.; Drexhage, H.A.; Voortman, T.; Freire, W.B. Prevalence of overweight and metabolic syndrome, and associated sociodemographic factors among adult Ecuadorian populations: The ENSANUT-ECU study. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yearbook of Vital Statistics Births and Deaths 2019; National Institute of Statistics and Censuses: Quito, Ecuador, 2019. Available online: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/webinec/Poblacion_y_Demografia/Nacimientos_Defunciones/2020/Boletin_%20tecnico_%20EDG%202019%20prov.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2020).
- Burtscher, M. Effects of living at higher altitudes on mortality: A narrative review. Aging Dis. 2014, 5, 274–280. [Google Scholar]
- Voss, J.D.; Masuoka, P.; Webber, B.J.; Scher, A.I.; Atkinson, R.L. Association of elevation, urbanization and ambient temperature with obesity prevalence in the United States. Int. J. Obes. 2013, 37, 1407–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Juna, C.F.; Cho, Y.H.; Joung, H. Low Elevation and Physical Inactivity Are Associated with a Higher Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Ecuadorian Adults: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020, 13, 2217–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallubinsky, H.; Phielix, E.; Dautzenberg, B.; Schaart, G.; Connell, N.J.; de Wit-Verheggen, V.; Havekes, B.; van Baak, M.A.; Schrauwen, P.; van Marken Lichtenbelt, W.D. Passive exposure to heat improves glucose metabolism in overweight humans. Acta Physiol. 2020, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Marken Lichtenbelt, W.; Hanssen, M.; Pallubinsky, H.; Kingma, B.; Schellen, L. Healthy excursions outside the thermal comfort zone. Build. Res. J. 2017, 45, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johnson, F.; Mavrogianni, A.; Ucci, M.; Vidal-Puig, A.; Wardle, J. Could increase time spent in a thermal comfort zone contribute to population increases in obesity? Obes. Rev. 2011, 12, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valdés, S.; Maldonado-Araque, C.; García-Torres, F.; Goday, A.; Bosch-Comas, A.; Bordiu, E.; Calle-Pascual, A.; Carmena, R.; Casamitjana, R.; Castaño, L.; et al. Ambient temperature and prevalence of obesity in the Spanish population: The [email protected] study. Obesity 2014, 22, 2328–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Speakman, J.R.; Heidari-Bakavoli, S. Type 2 diabetes, but not obesity, prevalence is positively associated with ambient temperature. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panagiotakos, D.B.; Chrysohoou, C.; Pitsavos, C.; Nastos, P.; Anadiotis, A.; Tentolouris, C.; Stefanadis, C.; Toutouzas, P.; Paliatsos, A. Climatological variations in daily hospital admissions for acute coronary syndromes. Int. J. Cardiol. 2004, 94, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parsons, K. Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort and Performance, 3rd ed.; Taylor and Francis Group: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Barnett, A.G.; Tong, S.; Clements, A.C.A. What measure of temperature is the best predictor of mortality? Environ. Res. 2010, 110, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barreca, A.I. Climate change, humidity, and mortality in the United States. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2012, 63, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gurka, M.J.; Filipp, S.L.; DeBoer, M.D. Geographical variation in the prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes among US adults. Nutr. Diabetes 2018, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tyrovolas, S.; Chalkias, C.; Morena, M.; Kalogeropoulos, K.; Tsakountakis, N.; Zeimbekis, A.; Gotsis, E.; Metallinos, G.; Bountziouka, V.; Lionis, C.; et al. High relative environmental humidity is associated with diabetes among elders living in Mediterranean islands. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2014, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaur, J.A. Comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freire, W.B.; Ramírez-Luzuriaga, M.J.; Belmont, P.; Mendieta, M.J.; SilvaJaramillo, K.; Romero, N. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de la Población Ecuatoriana de cero a 59 años. ENSANUT-ECU 2012, 1st ed.; Ministerio de Salud Pública/Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos: Quito, Ecuador, 2014.
- Ryan, H.; Trosclair, A.; Gfroerer, J. Adult current smoking: Differences in definitions and prevalence estimates—NHIS and NSDUH, 2008. J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- US Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans; US Department of Health and Human Services: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2008. Available online: http://www.health.gov/paguidelines (accessed on 5 January 2020).
- de Onis, M.; Habicht, J.P. Anthropometric reference data for international use: Recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 64, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Eblen-Zajjur, A.; Eblen-Zajjur, M. Calculo de la concentración de colesterol de la lipoproteína de baja densidad: Análisis de regresión versus formula de Friedewald. Rev. Med. Chile 2001, 129, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Documento Técnico de las Guías Alimentarias Basadas en Alimentos (GABA) del Ecuador. GABA-ECU 2018; Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador y Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura: Quito, Ecuador, 2018.
- Trumbo, P.; Schlicker, S.; Yates, A.A.; Poos, M. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 2002, 102, 1621–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Anuario Meteorológico No. 52-2012; Instituto Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología de Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2015; Available online: http://www.serviciometeorologico.gob.ec/wpcontent/uploads/anuarios/meteorologicos/Am%202012.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2020).
- Nicol, F. Adaptive thermal comfort standards in the hot–humid tropics. Energy Build. 2004, 36, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buonocore, C.; de Vecchi, R.; Scalco, V.; Lamberts, R. Influence of relative air humidity and movement on human thermal perception in classrooms in a hot and humid climate. Build. Environ. 2018, 146, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS, Version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2014.
- Tamerius, J.D.; Perzanowski, M.S.; Acosta, L.M.; Jacobson, J.S.; Goldstein, I.F.; Quinn, J.W.; Rundle, A.G.; Shaman, J. Socioeconomic and outdoor meteorological determinants of indoor temperature and humidity in New York City dwellings. Weather Clim. Soc. 2013, 5, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davis, R.E.; McGregor, G.R.; Enfield, K.B. Humidity: A review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health. Environ. Res. 2016, 144, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bentayeb, M.; Simoni, M.; Baiz, N.; Norback, D.; Baldacci, S.; Maio, S.; Viegi, G.; Annesi-Maesano, I. Adverse respiratory effects of outdoor air pollution in the elderly. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2012, 16, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, J.; Wang, J.; Yu, W. The lag effects and vulnerabilities of temperature effects on cardiovascular disease mortality in a subtropical climate zone in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 3982–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abrignani, M.G.; Corrao, S.; Biondo, G.B.; Renda, N.; Braschi, A.; Novo, G.; Di Girolamo, A.; Braschi, G.B.; Novo, S. Influence of climatic variables on acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009, 137, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dilaveris, P.; Synetos, A.; Giannopoulos, G.; Gialafos, E.; Pantazis, A.; Stefanadis, C. CLimate Impacts on Myocardial infarction deaths in the Athens Territory: The CLIMATE study. Heart 2006, 92, 1747–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ravljen, M.; Bilban, M.; Kajfez-Bogataj, L.; Hovelja, T.; Vavpotic, D. Influence of daily individual meteorological parameters on the incidence of acute coronary syndrome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 11616–11626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sharif Nia, H.; Chan, Y.H.; Froelicher, E.S.; Pahlevan Sharif, S.; Yaghoobzadeh, A.; Jafari, A.; Goudarzian, A.H.; Pourkia, R.; Haghdoost, A.A.; Arefinia, F.; et al. Weather fluctuations: Predictive factors in the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome. Health Promot. Perspect. 2019, 9, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morán-Tejeda, E.; Bazo, J.; López-Moreno, J.I.; Aguilar, E.; Azorín-Molina, C.; Sanchez-Lorenzo, A.; Martínez, R.; Nieto, J.J.; Mejía, R.; Martín-Hernández, N. Climate Trends and Variability in Ecuador (1966–2011). Int. J. Climatol. 2016, 36, 3839–3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Armstrong, B.; Sera, F.; Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M.; Abrutzky, R.; Åström, D.O.; Bell, M.L.; Chen, B.Y.; de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho, M.; Correa, P.M.; Dang, T.N.; et al. The Role of Humidity in Associations of High Temperature with Mortality: A Multicountry, Multicity Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsushita, M.; Yoneshiro, T.; Aita, S.; Kameya, T.; Sugie, H.; Saito, M. Impact of brown adipose tissue on body fatness and glucose metabolism in healthy humans. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 812–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orava, J.; Nuutila, P.; Lidell, M.E.; Oikonen, V.; Noponen, T.; Viljanen, T.; Scheinin, M.; Taittonen, M.; Niemi, T.; Enerbäck, S.; et al. Different metabolic responses of human brown adipose tissue to activation by cold and insulin. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Savva, C.; Korach-Andre, M. Estrogen Receptor beta (ERbeta) Regulation of Lipid Homeostasis-Does Sex Matter? Metabolites 2020, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Christakis, M.K.; Hasan, H.; De Souza, L.R.; Shirreff, L. The effect of menopause on metabolic syndrome: Cross-sectional results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Menopause 2020, 27, 999–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lobo, R.A. Metabolic syndrome after menopause and the role of hormones. Maturitas 2008, 60, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jouyandeh, Z.; Nayebzadeh, F.; Qorbani, M.; Asadi, M. Metabolic syndrome and menopause. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2013, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zheng, G.; Li, K.; Wang, Y. The Effects of High-Temperature Weather on Human Sleep Quality and Appetite. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Herman, C.P. Effects of heat on appetite. In Nutritional Needs in Hot Environments: Applications for Military Personnel in Field Operations; Marriott, B.M., Ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 187–214. [Google Scholar]
- Pilgrim, A.L.; Robinson, S.M.; Sayer, A.A.; Roberts, H.C. An overview of appetite decline in older people. Nurs. Older People 2015, 27, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maughan, R.J.; Otani, H.; Watson, P. Influence of relative humidity on prolonged exercise capacity in a warm environment. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 112, 2313–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chmura, P.; Konefal, M.; Andrzejewski, M.; Kosowski, J.; Rokita, A.; Chmura, J. Physical activity profile of 2014 FIFA World Cup players, with regard to different ranges of air temperature and relative humidity. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017, 61, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rennie, K.L.; McCarthy, N.; Yazdgerdi, S.; Marmot, M.; Brunner, E. Association of the metabolic syndrome with both vigorous and moderate physical activity. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 32, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Myers, J.; Kokkinos, P.; Nyelin, E. Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and the Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- van der Gaag, M.S.; van Tol, A.; Vermunt, S.H.; Scheek, L.M.; Schaafsma, G.; Hendriks, H.F. Alcohol consumption stimulates early steps in reverse cholesterol transport. J. Lipid. Res. 2001, 42, 2077–2083. [Google Scholar]
- Du, D.; Bruno, R.; Blizzard, L.; Venn, A.; Dwyer, T.; Smith, K.J.; Magnussen, C.G.; Gall, S. The metabolomic signatures of alcohol consumption in young adults. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, I.K. Association of Smoking Status and High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol in Males in the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Korean J. Health Promot. 2017, 17, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, R.B.; Ducatman, A. Associations between smoking and lipid/lipoprotein concentrations among US adults aged ≥20 years. J. Circ. Biomark. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Flow diagram for the selection of study participants.
Table 1.
Descriptive characteristics of participants according to relative humidity of residence.
| Variables | Men | Women | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Relative Humidity | High Relative Humidity | p-Value | Low Relative Humidity | High Relative Humidity | p-Value | |
| Number of people, N (%) | 869 (44.2) | 1095 (55.8) | 1525 (37.6) | 2535 (62.4) | ||
| Age, years, N (%) | 0.744 | 0.0332 | ||||
| 20–29 | 305 (38.5) | 400 (38.7) | 498 (33.5) | 923 (39.6) | ||
| 30–39 | 292 (29.6) | 367 (28.7) | 544 (30.3) | 913 (30.0) | ||
| 40–49 | 198 (20.9) | 249 (19.5) | 397 (25.5) | 595 (20.5) | ||
| 50–59 | 74 (11.0) | 79 (13.1) | 86 (10.7) | 104 (9.9) | ||
| Ethnicity, N (%) | <0.0001 | 0.0003 | ||||
| Mestizo | 802 (88.2) | 937 (73.4) | 1397 (86.4) | 2186 (79.0) | ||
| Others | 67 (11.8) | 158 (26.6) | 128 (13.6) | 349 (21.0) | ||
| Family economic status a, N (%) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Low | 191 (21.3) | 342 (32.9) | 400 (22.8) | 835 (33.6) | ||
| Middle | 391 (44.4) | 542 (49.6) | 637 (40.6) | 1245 (49.7) | ||
| High | 287 (34.3) | 211 (17.5) | 488 (36.6) | 455 (16.7) | ||
| Education level, N (%) | 0.0004 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Primary school | 217 (22.9) | 290 (28.9) | 415 (24.3) | 716 (32.6) | ||
| Secondary school | 395 (48.4) | 569 (52.5) | 694 (47.3) | 1218 (45.4) | ||
| College or higher | 257 (28.7) | 236 (18.6) | 416 (28.4) | 601 (22.0) | ||
| Current alcohol consumption b, N (%) | 0.2684 | 0.9006 | ||||
| Yes | 478 (56.6) | 631 (59.9) | 392 (25.7) | 672 (25.4) | ||
| No | 391 (43.4) | 464 (40.1) | 1133 (74.3) | 1863 (74.6) | ||
| Current smoking c, N (%) | 0.1086 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Yes | 303 (30.9) | 350 (26.5) | 114 (8.1) | 118 (3.5) | ||
| No | 566 (69.1) | 745 (73.5) | 1411 (91.9) | 2417 (96.5) | ||
| Physical activity d, N (%) | 0.0432 | 0.0007 | ||||
| Yes | 394 (44.7) | 456 (38.6) | 276 (20.0) | 400 (14.2) | ||
| No | 475 (55.3) | 639 (61.4) | 1249 (80.0) | 2135 (85.8) | ||
| Environmental conditions (mean ± SE) | ||||||
| Elevation (masl) | 1345.7 ± 58.6 | 703.1 ± 45.8 | <0.0001 | 1456.8 ± 48.9 | 650.7 ± 28.7 | <0.0001 |
| Temperature (°C) | 20.4 ± 0.2 | 22.6 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 | 20 ± 0.2 | 22.7 ± 0.1 | <0.0001 |
a Low (Q1 and Q2), middle (Q3 and Q4), and high (Q5) according to the Wealth Index; b “yes” alcoholic beverage consumption in the past 30 days; c “yes” cigarette smoking in the past 30 days; d “yes” vigorous-intensity activities performance for at least 1 h 15 min or moderate-intensity activities for at least 2 h 30 min during the past seven days; masl, meters above sea level.
Table 2.
Anthropometry, biomarkers of metabolic syndrome (MetS), and energy intake by relative humidity of residence.
Table 2.
Anthropometry, biomarkers of metabolic syndrome (MetS), and energy intake by relative humidity of residence.
| Variables | Low Relative Humidity | High Relative Humidity | p-Value | Low Relative Humidity | High Relative Humidity | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (869) | (1095) | (1525) | (2535) | |||
| Anthropometric and biochemical variable (mean ± SE) | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.5 ± 0.2 | 26.8 ± 0.2 | 0.4684 | 27.2 ± 0.2 | 27.6 ± 0.2 | 0.0461 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 94.7 ± 2.2 | 95.6 ± 2.4 | 0.7722 | 98.3 ± 3.7 | 91.5 ± 1.3 | 0.0796 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 125.1 ± 2.1 | 123.9 ± 1.7 | 0.6468 | 116.3 ± 1.3 | 115.6 ± 0.9 | 0.6341 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79.9 ± 2.2 | 79.0 ± 1.7 | 0.7634 | 73.7 ± 1.3 | 72.3 ± 0.8 | 0.3956 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 93.8 ± 1.2 | 95.2 ± 1.9 | 0.5249 | 92.7 ± 0.8 | 93.0 ± 1.1 | 0.8312 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 186.7 ± 1.8 | 184.8 ± 1.8 | 0.4416 | 181.4 ± 1.3 | 178.3 ± 1.3 | 0.0899 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 40.6 ± 0.5 | 42.2 ± 0.6 | 0.0278 | 45.5 ± 0.5 | 47.0 ± 0.4 | 0.0146 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 112.2 ± 1.5 | 110.4 ± 1.5 | 0.3928 | 108.9 ± 1.1 | 108.7 ± 1.0 | 0.8622 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 179.2 ± 5.5 | 169.4 ± 6.7 | 0.2589 | 129.7 ± 3.2 | 122.2 ± 2.3 | 0.0541 |
| Macronutrient intake (mean ± SE) | ||||||
| Energy (kcal) | 2123.8 ± 20.2 | 2210.5 ± 20.8 | 0.0028 | 1826.9 ± 15.1 | 1868.5 ± 14.3 | 0.0463 |
| EER (%) | 81.6 ± 1.0 | 86.1 ± 1.0 | 0.0033 | 97.1 ± 0.9 | 99.8 ± 0.9 | 0.0364 |
BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; EER, estimated energy requirement.
Table 3.
Prevalence and adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for MetS by relative humidity of residence.
Table 3.
Prevalence and adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for MetS by relative humidity of residence.
| Men | Women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Components of MetS | Low Relative Humidity | High Relative Humidity | Low Relative Humidity | High Relative Humidity |
| (n = 869) | (n = 1095) | (n = 1525) | (n = 2535) | |
| Increased waist circumference | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 34.00 | 19.17 | 41.14 | 25.62 |
| OR (95 % CI) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.13 (0.85–1.48) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.21 (0.95–1.53) |
| Elevated blood pressure | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 18.50 | 9.99 | 8.85 | 5.35 |
| OR (95 % CI) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.96(0.71–1.28) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.02 (0.75–1.38) |
| Reduced HDL cholesterol | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 33.34 | 16.33 | 25.55 | 38.69 |
| OR (95 % CI) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.87 (0.66–1.13) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.25 (1.06–1.56) |
| Elevated triglycerides | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 30.98 | 14.22 | 16.96 | 9.30 |
| OR (95 % CI) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.80 (0.61–1.06) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.87 (0.68–1.11) |
| Elevated fasting glucose | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 9.24 | 7.13 | 9.31 | 5.73 |
| OR (95 % CI) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.20 (084–1.70) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.83 (0.61–1.12) |
| Metabolic syndrome | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 24.13 | 12.41 | 11.53 | 17.73 |
| OR (95 % CI) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.84 (0.61–1.14) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.20 (1.01–1.42) |
All values accounted for the complex sampling design effect using the PROC SURVEY procedure. OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. The multiple logistic regression analysis was adjusted for age, ethnicity, family economic status, education level, BMI (except for the model of waist circumference), physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking, energy intake, and resident elevation.
Table 4.
Odds ratios for MetS among residents living in high relative humidity according to lifestyle factors.
Table 4.
Odds ratios for MetS among residents living in high relative humidity according to lifestyle factors.
| Components of MetS | Men | Women | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (95 % CI) | p-Value | No (95 % CI) | p-Value | Yes (95 % CI) | p-Value | No (95 % CI) | p-Value | |
| Current alcohol consumption | ||||||||
| Increased waist circumference | 1.18 (0.81 ± 1.73) | 0.3817 | 0.99 (0.65 ± 1.51) | 0.9757 | 1.58 (0.99 ± 2.51) | 0.0552 | 0.93 (0.70 ± 1.25) | 0.6386 |
| Elevated blood pressure | 1.09 (0.78 ± 1.53) | 0.6478 | 1.03 (0.69 ± 1.54) | 0.9025 | 0.83 (0.50 ± 1.37) | 0.1115 | 1.02 (0.78 ± 1.34) | 0.8161 |
| Reduced HDL cholesterol | 0.86 (0.58 ± 1.27) | 0.4400 | 0.77 (0.48 ± 1.23) | 0.2400 | 1.31 (1.01 ± 1.69) | 0.0350 | 0.99 (0.65 ± 1.53) | 0.9746 |
| Elevated triglycerides | 0.76 (0.52 ± 1.10) | 0.1464 | 0.78 (051 ± 1.19) | 0.2487 | 0.88 (0.49 ± 1.56) | 0.4711 | 1.03 (0.80 ± 1.34) | 0.8119 |
| Elevated fasting glucose | 1.09 (0.70 ± 1.73) | 0.6922 | 1.60 (0.94 ± 2.70) | 0.0785 | 0.54 (0.27 ± 1.06) | 0.0735 | 0.95 (0.68 ± 1.33) | 0.7663 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 0.87 (0.60 ± 1.32) | 0.4988 | 0.88 (0.54 ± 1.41) | 0.7616 | 0.79 (0.47 ± 1.33) | 0.3849 | 1.16 (0.87 ± 1.54) | 0.3078 |
| Current smoking | ||||||||
| Increased waist circumference | 1.24 (0.78 ± 1.96) | 0.3684 | 1.19 (0.86 ± 1.64) | 0.3030 | 1.43 (0.90 ± 2.28) | 0.1290 | 0.56 (0.21 ± 1.50) | 0.2464 |
| Elevated blood pressure | 0.56 (0.36 ± 0.87) | 0.0101 | 0.87 (0.61 ± 1.25) | 0.4605 | 0.89 (0.27 ± 2.95) | 0.8537 | 0.91 (0.69 ± 1.19) | 0.4910 |
| Reduced HDL cholesterol | 0.89 (0.57 ± 1.38) | 0.5916 | 0.99 (0.73 ± 1.36) | 0.9612 | 1.95 (1.30 ± 2.93) | 0.0013 | 1.08 (0.83 ± 1.39) | 0.5484 |
| Elevated triglycerides | 1.00 (0.63 ± 1.59) | 0.9877 | 0.78 (0.56 ± 1.16) | 0.1177 | 0.41 (0.15 ± 1.07) | 0.0681 | 1.07 (0.86 ± 1.33) | 0.5359 |
| Elevated fasting glucose | 1.21 (0.62 ± 2.36) | 0.5720 | 0.88 (0.60 ± 1.29) | 0.5017 | 0.66 (0.12 ± 3.60) | 0.6278 | 0.81 (0.61 ± 1.08) | 0.1480 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 1.03 (0.64 ± 1.65) | 0.9118 | 1.05 (0.67 ± 1.66) | 0.7658 | 0.35 (0.11 ± 1.05) | 0.0623 | 1.09 (0.82 ± 1.47) | 0.4500 |
| Physical activity | ||||||||
| Increased waist circumference | 0.98 (0.60 ± 1.61) | 0.9300 | 1.37 (0.85 ± 2.20) | 0.1937 | 0.83 (0.44 ± 1.58) | 0.5655 | 1.15 (0.88 ± 1.47) | 0.2747 |
| Elevated blood pressure | 1.04 (0.70 ± 1.55) | 0.7428 | 1.13 (0.80 ± 1.60) | 0.4095 | 0.69 (1.05 ± 1.13) | 0.3457 | 1.06 (0.78 ± 1.43) | 0.7264 |
| Reduced HDL cholesterol | 0.94 (0.64 ± 1.38) | 0.7484 | 0.86 (0.58 ± 1.26) | 0.4387 | 1.28 (0.77 ± 2.12) | 0.3349 | 1.20 (0.97 ± 1.48) | 0.0975 |
| Elevated triglycerides | 0.59 (0.37 ± 0.85) | 0.0067 | 0.94 (0.64 ± 1.38) | 0.7556 | 0.88 (0.49 ± 1.59) | 0.6650 | 1.01 (0.80 ± 1.28) | 0.9145 |
| Elevated fasting glucose | 1.16 (0.65 ± 2.08) | 0.6210 | 0.84 (0.55 ± 1.27) | 0.4022 | 0.96 (0.42 ± 2.24) | 0.9325 | 0.79 (0.59 ± 1.06) | 0.1125 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 0.87 (0.54 ± 1.45) | 0.5708 | 0.79 (0.52 ± 1.22) | 0.2860 | 1.03 (0.55 ± 1.91) | 0.9368 | 1.23 (1.02 ± 1.48) | 0.0301 |
| High a (95 % CI) | p-Value | Low (95 % CI) | p-Value | High a (95 % CI) | p-Value | Low (95 % CI) | p-Value | |
| % EER | ||||||||
| Increased waist circumference | 0.91 (0.45 ± 1.87) | 0.8163 | 1.24 (0.85 ± 1.80) | 0.2672 | 1.35 (0.98 ± 1.86) | 0.0645 | 0.85 (0.60 ± 1.18) | 0.3307 |
| Elevated blood pressure | 1.06 (0.52 ± 2.15) | 0.6800 | 1.11 (0.81 ± 1.52) | 0.5308 | 1.18 (0.78 ± 1.78) | 0.5875 | 0.96 (0.71 ± 1.32) | 0.3117 |
| Reduced HDL cholesterol | 0.96 (0.46 ± 1.99) | 0.4993 | 0.77 (0.53 ± 1.13) | 0.2813 | 1.06 (0.77 ± 1.63) | 0.6920 | 1.32 (0.99 ± 1.79) | 0.0578 |
| Elevated triglycerides | 0.86 (0.39 ± 1.87) | 0.8164 | 0.82 (0.50 ± 1.06) | 0.1985 | 0.88 (0.66 ± 1.64) | 0.4841 | 1.05 (0.80 ± 1.41) | 0.7065 |
| Elevated fasting glucose | 0.88 (0.43 ± 1.80) | 0.7201 | 1.01 (0.68 ± 1.56) | 0.9564 | 0.85 (0.55 ± 1.30) | 0.4597 | 0.77 (0.53 ± 1.11) | 0.1605 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 0.81 (0.33 ± 1.92) | 0.6444 | 0.91 (0.65 ± 1.28) | 0.5948 | 0.91 (0.64 ± 1.29) | 0.6005 | 1.22 (0.91 ± 1.65) | 0.1808 |
ORs were calculated based on low relative humidity residents (reference); a high (>100%) or low (≤100%) for EER; CI, confidence interval; HDL high-density lipoprotein; EER, estimated energy requirement.
Table 5.
Odds ratios for MetS among women living in high relative humidity according to menopausal stage.
Table 5.
Odds ratios for MetS among women living in high relative humidity according to menopausal stage.
| Components of MetS | Women (n = 4060) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (95 % CI) | p-Value | No (95 % CI) | p-Value | |
| Menopausal stage | ||||
| Increased waist circumference | 1.34 (1.09 ± 1.63) | 0.0045 | 0.22 (0.02 ± 3.04) | 0.2550 |
| Elevated blood pressure | 3.10 (1.15 ± 8.35) | 0.0253 | 0.80 (0.60 ± 1.07) | 0.1382 |
| Reduced HDL cholesterol | 1.48 (0.59 ± 3.74) | 0.4064 | 1.13 (0.93 ± 1.37) | 0.2243 |
| Elevated triglycerides | 2.37 (0.96 ± 5.90) | 0.0627 | 0.87 (0.70 ± 1.08) | 0.2130 |
| Elevated fasting glucose | 0.90 (0.31 ± 2.64) | 0.8510 | 0.81 (0.61 ± 1.08) | 0.1442 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 5.42 (1.92 ± 15.27) | 0.0015 | 0.89 (0.71 ± 1.12) | 0.3177 |
ORs were calculated based on low relative humidity residents (reference). CI, confidence interval; HDL high-density lipoprotein.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Juna, C.F.; Cho, Y.H.; Ham, D.; Joung, H. Associations of Relative Humidity and Lifestyles with Metabolic Syndrome among the Ecuadorian Adult Population: Ecuador National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-ECU) 2012. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239023
AMA Style
Juna CF, Cho YH, Ham D, Joung H. Associations of Relative Humidity and Lifestyles with Metabolic Syndrome among the Ecuadorian Adult Population: Ecuador National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-ECU) 2012. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(23):9023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239023
Chicago/Turabian StyleJuna, Christian F., Yoon Hee Cho, Dongwoo Ham, and Hyojee Joung. 2020. "Associations of Relative Humidity and Lifestyles with Metabolic Syndrome among the Ecuadorian Adult Population: Ecuador National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-ECU) 2012" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 23: 9023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239023
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
