Next Article in Journal
Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
Previous Article in Journal
“Are Filipinos Aging Well?”: Determinants of Subjective Well-Being among Senior Citizens of the Community-Based ENGAGE Study
Article

Fair and Reasonable Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources Based on an Asymmetric Nash Negotiation Model from the Satisfaction Perspective: A Case Study for the Lancang–Mekong River Bain

1
Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
2
National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Nanjing 210098, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(20), 7638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207638
Received: 4 September 2020 / Revised: 11 October 2020 / Accepted: 15 October 2020 / Published: 20 October 2020
The issue of trans-boundary water conflict has become an important factor affecting the relations between basin countries. The key to solve the current conflict problem is to realize the fair and reasonable allocation of trans-boundary water resources. Based on the satisfaction perspective, we developed an asymmetric Nash negotiation model to obtain an optimal and feasible allocation scheme for the trans-boundary water resources. Firstly, based on the two international water laws, we analyzed the influencing factors including water demand differences, resource endowment differences, and water efficiency differences, and by combing with the flexible weight constraint, we built the fair and reasonable allocation pattern for trans-boundary water resources. Secondly, under the constraint of the allocation pattern, we determined the ideal negotiation scheme of each basin country by considering their selection preference. Thirdly, we built a satisfaction degree function and established an asymmetric Nash negotiation model. This is used to build a fair negotiation mechanism among basin countries, and the allocation scheme after negotiation is regarded as the optimal allocation scheme. Lastly, we took the Lancang–Mekong river basin as an example. For this example, the results indicate the following: (1) after considering multiple factors comprehensively, China and Thailand obtained a higher proportion of trans-boundary water resource quota under different preference scenarios, while Myanmar obtained a lower proportion of trans-boundary water resource quota; (2) taking each basin country as the negotiation agent, the optimal allocation scheme with the introduction of fair negotiation mechanism has a higher degree of satisfaction, with an average of over 87.19%, which is more stable and easy to be accepted by all basin countries; (3) from the perspective of the change rate and the average satisfaction of the basin countries, the optimal allocation scheme under the resource endowment preference scenario obtained the highest satisfaction among basin countries. This study aims to improve the practicability and acceptability of trans-boundary water resources allocation, thus providing technical support for reducing trans-boundary water resources conflicts. View Full-Text
Keywords: trans-boundary water resources; multi-criteria decision making; flexible weight constraint; asymmetric Nash negotiation model; Lancang–Mekong River basin trans-boundary water resources; multi-criteria decision making; flexible weight constraint; asymmetric Nash negotiation model; Lancang–Mekong River basin
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, F.; Wu, F.-p.; Chen, L.-x.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.-n.; Shao, Z.-y. Fair and Reasonable Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources Based on an Asymmetric Nash Negotiation Model from the Satisfaction Perspective: A Case Study for the Lancang–Mekong River Bain. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207638

AMA Style

Li F, Wu F-p, Chen L-x, Zhao Y, Chen X-n, Shao Z-y. Fair and Reasonable Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources Based on an Asymmetric Nash Negotiation Model from the Satisfaction Perspective: A Case Study for the Lancang–Mekong River Bain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(20):7638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Fang, Feng-ping Wu, Liu-xin Chen, Yue Zhao, Xiang-nan Chen, and Zhi-ying Shao. 2020. "Fair and Reasonable Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources Based on an Asymmetric Nash Negotiation Model from the Satisfaction Perspective: A Case Study for the Lancang–Mekong River Bain" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 20: 7638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207638

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop