Next Article in Journal
The Contribution of Avoidable Mortality to the Life Expectancy Gains in Korea between 1998 and 2017
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Parental Attitude Toward Psychiatric Help on Their Children’s Suicidal Ideation: A Convenience Sample Study on One South Korean Middle School
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Self-Report Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 18
10.3390/ijerph17186498
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcultural Differences in Risk Factors and in Triggering Reasons of Suicidal and Self-Harming Behaviour in Young People with and without a Migration Background

by
Zeliha Özlü-Erkilic
1,2,
Thomas Wenzel
3,
Oswald D. Kothgassner
4 and
Türkan Akkaya-Kalayci
1,2,*
1
Outpatient Clinic of Transcultural Psychiatry and Migration Induced Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Postgraduate University Program Transcultural Medicine and Diversity Care, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
4
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(18), 6498; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186498
Submission received: 3 August 2020 / Revised: 28 August 2020 / Accepted: 3 September 2020 / Published: 7 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Suicidal Behavior as a Complex Dynamical System)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Minors with and without migration background can have different risk factors and triggering reasons for self-harming and suicidal behaviour. We retrospectively analysed the data of 192 children and adolescents to investigate the transcultural differences in self-harming, as well as suicidal behaviour in Austrian, Turkish, and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (BCS)-speaking patients, who were treated in an emergency out-patient clinic in Vienna. Our results showed transcultural differences in both behaviours. In all groups, females had higher rates of suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour than males. While Turkish-speaking patients received treatment more often, after attempted suicide, Austrians and BCS-speaking patients needed treatment more often for acute stress disorder. Suicide attempts and self-harming behaviours were triggered most frequently by intrafamilial problems, but more frequently in migrant patients. Turkish-speaking patients were at a more than 2 times (OR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.408–3.477) higher risk for suicide attempts, and were triggered almost 3 times (OR = 2.94, 95%CI: 1.632–5.304) more often by interfamilial conflicts. The suicide attempts of BCS-speaking minors were more often caused by relationship and separation crises (OR = 2.56, 95%CI: 1.148–5.705). These transcultural differences in suicidal and self-harming behaviour of minors, demand an increase of transcultural competence to provide optimal treatment of migrant children.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organisation, worldwide about 800,000 people die due to suicide each year [1]. While the risk of dying from completed suicide rises with increasing age, suicide attempts are statistically more common among adolescents [2]. Additionally, auto-aggressive behaviours such as self-harming [3] and suicidal behaviour [2] are associated with younger age. Numerous studies reported that suicidality is the most frequent reason for a referral to paediatric Emergency Departments [4,5,6].

1.1. Self-harming and Suicide Attempt

Self-harming behaviour or “non-suicidal self-injury” is defined as direct and deliberate destruction of body tissue, with no intent to die, e.g., skin cutting [7]. Whereas a suicide attempt is a self-injurious behaviour in which the aim is to die, e.g., shooting oneself [8]. Suicidal ideation is defined as “thoughts of engaging in behaviour intended to end one’s life” [9].

1.2. Distinguishing Suicidal Ideation from Suicide Attempt

The “Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model” (IMV) maintains that suicide is a behaviour resulting from different factors and describes the crucial aspects from ideation to behaviour in detail.
The IMV model describes three stages of suicidal behaviour—(1) pre-motivational phase (background factors that might cause suicide); (2) motivational phase (development of suicidal ideation) and (3) volitional phase (factors crucial for transition from ideation to attempting suicide). The volitional phase factors, e.g., exposure to suicide, access to means, planning, impulsivity, physical pain sensitivity, fearlessness about death, imagery and past behaviour, are crucial for transforming suicide ideations to suicide attempts. The study of Branley-Bell et al. [10] compared suicide attempters with those showing suicide ideation, in the three stages of suicidal behaviour, as mentioned above. In the motivational phase, there were no differences between suicide attempters and those showing suicidal ideation, but the volitional phase factors of these two groups varied. In all volitional phase factors, suicide attempters varied from the ideation group—they reported a higher capability for suicide, were more impulsive, and more frequently had a family member or friend who had self-injured or attempted suicide [10].

1.3. Risk Factors

Although suicide attempts are more frequent among females [11,12,13,14,15], more males [16,17] die by suicide. Young women are more exposed to risk factors that can lead to suicide attempts, and their vulnerability is also higher, compared to male adolescents [18]. In addition, diverse genetic, biological, psychiatric, psychological, social and cultural factors can influence suicidal as well as self-harming behaviour [19]. There is a considerably larger range of specific factors that increase the risk of suicidal behaviour of youths, such as—previous suicide attempts [20] and acts of self-harm [21], adverse family experiences [22], parental hostility [23], parental violence [19], psychological abuse [24], low peer-group integration [25], emotionally stressful experiences [26], adverse personality traits [27], negative life events [28], low and ineffective coping strategies [29], mental disorders [30], financial problems in the family [25], substance abuse [31], parental addiction [32], interpersonal problems [33], school-related stress [34] and hopelessness [34].
Similarly, self-harming behaviour might be associated with risk factors like sexual and physical abuse in childhood [35], low self-esteem [35], social isolation [36], impulsivity [37], hopelessness [38], bullying [37], mental disorders [30], as well as perfectionism and self-criticism [39]. Certainly, negative experiences within the family, like maladaptive parenting [40], child and family adversity including parental divorce [35], poor parent–child attachment [41], and low socioeconomic situation of the family [42], can also evoke self-harming behaviour.

1.4. Transcultural Risk Factors

Having a migration background or migration experience could also be expected to be risk factors for different forms of suicidal behaviour [43]. Suicidal behaviours in different migrant groups are higher [44] not only because of cross-cultural differences in their risk and resilience factors [45] but because they also have a higher lifetime rate of self-harming behaviour and attempted suicides [46], compared to their native peers.
Migration-induced stressors such as language difficulties, loss of social networks, identity problems, discrimination, racism, discrepancies between norms and values of the society of origin, and that of the host society, living conditions in the host country, problems of acculturation, and stressful life events can negatively affect youths with a migration background [47]. In particular, self-harming and suicidal behaviour arise more often in adolescents with low socioeconomic status [48] and with more experiences of negative life-events [49]. Migrants living in Austria, like those in other European countries, have lower income levels and consequently have a much higher risk of poverty, compared to the indigenous population [50]. Therefore, migrant populations often have a higher rate of psychological problems [51].
The objective of the present study was to explore transcultural differences in risk factors and in triggering reasons of suicidal and self-harming behaviour, by comparing young outpatients with and without a migration background in a clinical population. We further wanted to evaluate the observation reported in most international studies, including those mentioned above, that suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour are the most frequent reasons for an acute referral, when analysing referrals in both subgroups in Austria. We also hypothesised that different transcultural risk factors could be observed to contribute to suicidal and self-harming behaviour among children and adolescents, with and without a migration background, as relevant key factors to be considered in prevention and as a possible treatment focus. To our best knowledge, no study in Europe up until now explicitly analysed the transcultural differences in self-harming and suicidal behaviours among children and adolescents, with and without migration backgrounds, such as those most common in Austria (Austrian and Turkish as well as Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian-speaking (BCS-speaking).

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Participants

Over a three-year period, a total of 1821 children and adolescents were admitted to the Emergency Unit of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the Medical University of Vienna. For the present study, which was conducted between 06/2011–06/2014, in the first-step evaluation process we included the records of 1718 patients aged between 4–18 years old, as 103 of the patients did not fit into the age range of our study. In the second step, only the data of 1093 patients belonging to three nationalities—Austrians (n = 800), BCS-speaking (n = 163), and Turkish-speakers (n = 130) were analysed for their reason of admission to the emergency psychiatric clinic. Afterwards, the total data of 192 children and adolescents of these three groups who showed self-harming behaviour (n = 47) and attempted suicide (n = 145), were analysed in detail, for the risk factors and triggering reasons. Patients of other nationalities were excluded, as the present study focused on the transcultural differences between Austrian, Turkish, and BCS-speaking patients.
After Germans, the BCS and Turkish-speaking migrants are the largest migrant communities living in Austria [52], therefore, in the present study, we concentrated on these two migrant groups.
In the present study, the more specific ethnic origin of the patients from Turkey (such as “Kurdish” and “Armenian” of the wide range of ethnic groups living in Turkey) was not part of the records available. Therefore, we use the term “Turkish-speaking minors” for all minors originating from Turkey, which does not refer to their mother language, or language predominantly used in everyday life, or to primary citizenship. Therefore, some participants might still speak a different mother tongue in daily life than Turkish, and have different ethnic backgrounds as well (e.g., Arab, Kurdish, etc., or in second-generation patients, German) and different present official or dual citizenships (Turkish, Austrian, or other).
The definition of “migration background” used in this study follows the Austrian public statistical standards definition, which states, “at least one parent or grandparent was not born in the host country” [50].
Two clinics offer medical care for the mental-health problems of children and adolescents living in Vienna. One of these two clinics, the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Medical University of Vienna, offers medical care for about half of the Viennese children and adolescents aged between 0–18 years. Each clinic is responsible and offers medical care only for the assigned districts. The migrant populations vary considerably in these different districts, in some districts, the number of migrants is quite high, but in others, it is quite low. Therefore, we suppose that these differences provide a realistic sample composition for patients with and without a migration background. As the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Medical University of Vienna is responsible for the psychiatric treatment of more than half of the Viennese children and adolescents with mental health problems, our study sample is therefore representative of the Viennese population.

2.2. Procedures and Measures

We applied a questionnaire (standardised data matrix) with a specific data sheet developed for this study, to be used for the retrospective data analysis, which included items from the hospital standard medical history, socio-demographic data like nationality, country of origin, languages spoken at home, age, and sex, reasons for referral, psychosocial details and migration-specific information. Furthermore, we analysed different risk factors like migration background, problems with peers, problems at school, etc., as identified in the earlier research outlined before, which might particularly influence the suicidal and self-harming behaviour of the youths. In particular, we focused on the transcultural differences in suicidal and self-harming behaviour, between the three study groups, as well as separately within each study group.
Our results are therefore based on the standardised file records. During the acute or emergency treatment of children and adolescents, the anamnesis (medical history) might not necessarily be recorded in full detail in the hospital’s records. Consequently, our results are based on sometimes incomplete sets of data for each case.
We used IBM SPSS Statistics, version 24 to perform the statistics evaluation [53]. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to capture the impact of the risk factors. We compared each specific group in relation to other groups using ORs. The OR is the ratio of the odds obtained from two different dichotomous variables, using a formula reported by Bland et al. [54]. For significance testing, an alpha level of 0.05 was applied. Some results with an alpha level of 0.10 are displayed with the tendency to significance.
The present study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (Registration number: EK 901/2010).

3. Results

In the first-step of the evaluation process, the records of 1718 patients aged between 4–18 years old were analysed. More than half (53.4%, n= 918) of them had a migration background and just 46.6% (n= 800) of them were native Austrians. A total of 9.5% (n = 163) of the patients with migration background originated from Bosnia/Croatia/Serbia, 7.6% (n = 130) were from Turkey, and 36.4% (n = 625) were originally from other countries like India, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, etc. Based on the already listed criteria, the present study included 1093 files of patients from Austria (n = 800), from Bosnia/Croatia/Serbia (n = 163), and from Turkey (n = 130), for statistical analyses of gender and referral reasons to emergency psychiatric outpatient-clinic.

3.1. Study Sample

As Table 1 indicates, more female patients than male patients received acute treatment at the emergency outpatient clinic in the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. This was true for all three investigated groups. The highest gender difference was observed among Turkish-speaking patients, nearly three quarters (71.5%) of them being females.
The mean age of the whole study sample was 14.56 (SD = 3.0, range 4–18) years. The mean age of both genders (females—14.97 years and males—13.97 years), as well as the mean age of three study groups (Turkish-speaking patients—15.11 years, Austrian patients—14.56 years, and BCS-speaking patients—14.14 years) were quite similar. The majority (83.6%) of the patients were aged between 12–18 years, i.e., in puberty.

3.2. Referral Reasons in the Different Patient Groups at Admission Time

In the whole study sample, suicide attempts (13.3%) were the third most frequent reason for documented treatment, after acute stress disorder (20.3%) and behavioural disorders (13.9%). Turkish-speaking patients were most likely to receive acute treatment at the emergency outpatient clinic for attempted suicide (23.1%), whereas Austrian (20.9%) and BCS-speaking (19%) patients most frequently received treatment for acute stress disorder.
The number of patients seeking treatment for self-harming behaviour was quite similar between the patient groups. Slightly more Turkish-speaking patients (4.6%) received acute treatment due to self-harming behaviour, as compared to native (4.4%) and BCS background (3.7%) children and adolescents (Table 2).

3.3. Gender Differences in Referral Reasons among the Different Patient Groups

Austrian females were most frequently treated at the emergency outpatient clinic due to acute stress disorders (24.4%), while Austrian males were commonly treated for behavioural disorders (26.6%).
BCS-speaking females were admitted most frequently because of a suicide attempt (22.3%), while their countrymen were commonly treated because of a diagnosis of behavioural disorder (23.3%). However, females (23.7%), as well as males (21.6%) originating from Turkey, were most often treated for an attempted suicide at the Emergency department.
Across all three study groups, females had higher rates of suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour than males:
Suicide attempts—females vs. males:
  • Austrian patients: 14.6% vs. 6.3%
  • BCS-speaking patients: 22.3% vs. 6.7%
  • Turkish-speaking patients: 23.7% vs. 21.6%
Self-harming behaviour—females vs. males:
  • Austrian patients: 6.4% vs. 1.7%
  • BCS-speaking patients: 3.9% vs. 3.3%
  • Turkish-speaking patients: 5.4% vs. 2.7%
While males with a migration background had lower rates of suicidal ideation than their fellow countrywomen, among Austrian patients there was almost no gender difference with regards to suicidal ideation:
Suicidal ideation—females vs. males:
  • Austrian patients: 11.8% vs. 12%
  • BCS-speaking patients: 4.9% vs. 3.3%
  • Turkish-speaking patients: 7.5% vs. 0%

3.4. Transcultural Differences in Triggering Factors for Suicide Attempts and Self-Harming Behaviour

The data of 145 patients who were admitted to the emergency psychiatric clinic after a suicide attempt and the data of 47 patients who showed self-harming behaviour were analysed in detail for triggering factors. For the present study, we clustered the triggering factors for suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour, according to the information in patient files, as follows—intrafamilial conflicts, relationship/separation crises, trauma, problems at school, psychological disorders, problems with peers, burdens due to physical disorders, and unknown reasons. Table 3 shows the triggering factors of suicide attempt and self-harming behaviour in three patient groups.
In the whole study sample (45.5%) as well as in three study groups, the most frequent triggering factor for a suicide attempt was intrafamilial problems. However, in more than half of the patients with migration background (Turkish—56.7% and BCS—55.6%), suicide attempts were triggered by intrafamilial problems, whereas only 38.6% of the Austrian-patient suicide-attempts were triggered by intrafamilial problems.
Similarly, intrafamilial problems were the most frequently recorded triggering factor for self-harming behaviour. Although no significant differences could be identified concerning triggering factors for self-harming behaviour and gender—in the whole study sample or within the study groups—patients with migration background showed significant gender differences concerning triggering factors for suicide attempts, but this was not the case in Austrians. In all study groups, intrafamilial conflicts were the most frequent triggering reason for attempted suicide, independent of gender, with the exception of Turkish-speaking males. In Turkish-speaking male patients, suicide attempts were most frequently due to relationship/separation crisis (37.5%).

3.5. Risk Factors and Triggering Reasons of Suicide Attempt and Self-Harming Behaviour

On the one hand, Turkish-speaking children and adolescents were at a more than 2 times (OR = 2.21, 95 % CI: 1.408–3.477, p = 0.001) higher risk for suicide attempts, as compared to other patient groups. Intrafamilial conflicts triggered suicide attempts approximately 2 times (OR = 1.76, 95 % CI: 0.960–3.211, p = 0.068) more often in BCS-speaking, and 3 times (OR = 2.94, 95 % CI: 1.632–5.304, p = 0.001) more often in Turkish-speaking children/adolescents, than in other study groups. On the other hand, relationship/separation crises triggered suicide attempts 2.5 times (OR = 2.56, 95 % CI: 1.148–5.705, p = 0.022) more often among BCS-speaking children/adolescents, and 2 times (OR = 2.12, 95 % CI: 0.846–5.311, p = 0.062) more often in Turkish-speaking patients, compared to the other groups in our study. In Turkish-speaking children and adolescents, the risk for a suicide attempt increased about 6-fold (OR = 5.65, 95 % CI: 0.933–34.241, p = 0.059) when they had problems with their peers.
Furthermore, compared to other patient groups, the risk for self-harming behaviour among Turkish-speaking children and adolescents was 3 times (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 0.813–12.484, p = 0.096) higher when they had problems at school.

3.6. Missing Data

The missing data were different between minors with a migration background and their indigenous peers. For example, among Turkish speaking patients, 6.7% of the triggering factors for the suicide attempts and 5.7% of the Austrian patients were missing. Therefore, we only included records when sufficient main data like nationality, country of origin, age, sex, and reasons for referral and triggering reason for a suicide attempt and self-harming behaviour were mostly available. In some cases, migration-specific information and sociodemographic data were missing, consequently the records of patients with a migration background had more missing data, overall.

4. Discussion

The aim of the present study was to identify clinically relevant social and demographic risk factors and triggering reasons for self-harming and suicidal behaviour among children and adolescents, which could be helpful in the diagnosis and treatment of young patients with migration background and in developing preventive measures.

4.1. Transcultural Differences among Natives and Migrants

In the hospital records, the percentage of missing data among children and adolescents with a migration background was higher, compared to their native peers. We assumed that especially in an emergency situation, the insufficient language skills of migrants make comprehending their medical history more difficult.
In the present study, the children and adolescents with a migration background were overrepresented in the emergency outpatient clinic. More than half of the children and adolescents treated in the emergency psychiatric outpatient clinic had a migration background, although in 2016, just a quarter (24.3%) of the young population aged between 0–24 years, living in Austria, had a migration background [50]. In line with our results, previous studies showed that adults, as well as minors with a migration background were overrepresented in the emergency outpatient clinics [4,55,56,57]. We assumed that institutional and cultural barriers hinder migrants from using both preventive and regular offers, therefore in Europe, the access of migrant groups to healthcare is noticeably lower than in non-migrant groups [58]. Among children and adolescents with a migration background, the prevalence of emergency psychiatric problems due to insufficient early interventions is higher, compared to their peers [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. This is caused by their reduced rate of help-seeking and lower utilisation of regular healthcare offers [62,69]. Consequently, paediatric services have to give stronger consideration to influence of cultural values as well as to migration-related factors, in order to avoid misdiagnosis and the resulting higher costs caused by late treatment interventions [70,71]. A study by Donath et al. [72] showed that migration background could be a risk factor for higher rates of suicide attempts, especially in those originating from Islam-dominated countries. As in our study, patients originating from Turkey and Bosnia are predominantly (Sunni) Muslim; thus, religious background might be more crucial than other cultural differences.

4.2. Gender Differences among Natives and Migrants

In the present study sample, Turkish patients most frequently received acute treatment after a suicide attempt, but this was not the case for Austrian and BCS patients. While females with Turkish and BCS background were treated most frequently for suicide attempts, female Austrians were most likely to receive treatment at the emergency outpatient clinic for acute stress disorders. Supporting our results, preceding studies showed that the rate of suicidal behaviour among migrant females was higher, compared to their indigenous same-sex peers [44,73] and their fellow countrymen [74]. Female migrants commonly experience more migration-induced burdens [75] and their use of psychological treatment is less than their fellow countrymen [76]. Similarly, Turkish males were most frequently treated because of an attempted suicide, whereas Austrian, as well as BCS males, were most frequently treated due to behavioural disorders. In general, Turkish patients had a more than 2 times higher risk for presentation, due to suicide attempts, as compared to other patient groups. The study of van Bergen et al. [77] showed that a stressful family environment caused by different values of the society of origin and host societies might lead to increased suicidal behaviour among young migrants. In our study sample, the cultural and religious differences might be highest among Turkish families, as they mainly originate from rural areas of Turkey, and mostly maintained their traditional life-style after migration to Austria [4,11].
In line with similar studies, the number of female suicide attempts [78,79,80,81,82] as well as self-harm cases [83,84] also exceeded that of males in the present study. On the other hand, only females with a migration background had higher rates of suicidal ideation than their ethnic peers, but this was not the case among Austrian patients.
The results of the present study showed that among migrant patients, suicidal ideation was much lower compared to Austrian patients, but it was the complete opposite concerning suicide attempts.
Supporting our results, previous studies showed that migrants are overrepresented in acute psychiatry; they mostly have a referral when they are in crisis [55].
Moreover, according to the “Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model” the volitional phase factors such as impulsivity, access to means, exposure to suicide, etc. (see Introduction section) are crucial for transforming suicidal ideations to suicide attempts. Therefore, in the study by Branley-Bell et al. [10], suicide attempters varied from those having ideation in the volitional phase in different factors. Our results showed notable differences in percentages between Austrian and migrant patients in suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, which might be explained by the factors of the volitional phase of the IMV model, as described above and in the Introduction section. Furthermore, the higher rates of suicide attempts among migrants, compared to the natives was mostly due to impulsiveness in crisis situations [85].

4.3. Transcultural Differences in Risk Factors and Triggering Reasons

The results of the present study showed that the risk for suicide attempts among Turkish-speaking children and adolescents was more than 2 times higher than other patient groups. Noticeable transcultural differences among triggers for suicide attempts were also observed. In the whole study sample, as well over all three study groups, suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour were triggered most frequently by intrafamilial problems, but more frequently in patients with migration background than in native peers. We assume that the incidence of intrafamilial conflicts in migrant families might be quite high, due to dissimilar attitudes between the different migrant generations [11,64,86]. Especially in traditional and authoritarian-oriented Turkish families, more intrafamilial conflicts might be observed, which might cause increased rates of suicide attempts [75]. The study of van Bergen et al. [77] showed that among Turkish-speaking adolescents living in the Netherlands, suicidal ideation due to intrafamilial problems was higher compared to native peers and other minority peers. Migrant parents most commonly accentuate the culture of origin, in contrary, their children mostly are influenced by the host culture, which might increase intrafamilial conflicts [11].
As already mentioned, the results of the present study showed significant gender differences in triggering factors for attempted suicide among patients with a migration background, but this was not so among Austrians. However, no gender differences in triggering factors for self-harming behaviour between the study groups were observed.
Certain factors increased the risk of suicide attempts and of self-harming, which were different among the study groups. While relationship/separation crises triggered suicide attempts more often among BCS children/adolescents and Turkish patients, as compared to natives, the suicide attempts of Austrian patients were triggered mostly by school problems and psychological disorders. In Turkish children and adolescents, the risk for a suicide attempt was increased about 6 times when they reported problems with their peers. Furthermore, compared to other patient groups, the risk for self-harming behaviour among Turkish-speaking children and adolescents was 3 times higher, if they had problems at school. This was probably because migrant youths have to manage diverse additional school-related challenges [87,88,89].

5. Conclusions

The results of the present study showed that migrants usually only seek help very late, if a situation has already reached a critical level, and not early, when an intervention would be more efficient. We assume that various structural, political, and socio-cultural factors might in general create barriers for migrants in the use of the healthcare system [90], contributing to these delays. Therefore, language [91] and culture sensitive healthcare measures for migrants are required, but in Austria, they have so far been insufficiently implemented to increase the timely utilisation of the healthcare offered [92]. Equal access to healthcare is universally accepted as part of the human rights system [93].
Furthermore, the results of the present study showed that transcultural differences in risk factors and triggering reasons of suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour, especially peer-related as well as school-related problems need to be considered in preventive measures, such as psycho-education programs, to establish and increase awareness and sensitivity to this topic. These culture-adapted measures could be expected to lead to a decisive reduction of suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour among youths. Additionally, school staff and families might recognize the specific warning signs and risk groups before a crisis arises, so that they could refer the pupils for professional help much earlier. [94]. Training of health professionals in transcultural competence should also include consideration of these differences [95], and in contrast to a common focus on physical illnesses [92], evidence-based mental health in migrant youth, requires more consideration and further research [71,96], especially with regards to the complex interactions between generations and the process of adapting to the host culture [97].

Limitations

  • As the present study was based on a retrospective analysis, using only available data retrieved from hospital records, data on socio-demographic features and risk factors, were frequently incomplete, possibly due to a focus on emergency treatment priorities or barriers in more prominent communication in such situations.
  • In the present study, we analysed Turkish-speaking and BCS-speaking children and adolescents with a migration background, living in Austria. Therefore, our results cannot be generalized to other groups of migrants living in Austria.
  • Furthermore, Turkish-speaking children and adolescents might have different ethnic backgrounds such as Kurdish, but in the present study the religion or ethnic origin of the patients was not a part of the record. As families of Kurdish or Turkish backgrounds naturally have different religious and cultural norms, this fact might lead to bias in our results. Bosnians are mainly Muslim, Serbs orthodox, and again might have very different backgrounds relating to experiences of war or religious factors. These potential differences again could not be explored, due to the limitations of the available emergency room records.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E.; methodology, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E.; software, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E.; validation, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E.; formal analysis, T.A.-K., Z.Ö.-E., and O.D.K.; investigation, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E; resources, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E; data curation, T.A.-K., Z.Ö.-E. and O.D.K.; writing—original draft preparation, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E.; writing—review and editing, T.A.-K., Z.Ö.-E., O.D.K. and T.W.; visualization, T.A.-K., Z.Ö.-E., O.D.K. and T.W.; supervision, T.A.-K.; project administration, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E.; funding acquisition, T.A.-K. and Z.Ö.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was funded by the Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City of Vienna (Number of grant: 12001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. World Health Organization Suicide Prevention. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/suicide#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 10 November 2019).
  2. Kapusta, N.; Grabenhofer-Eggerth, A.; Blüml, V.; Klein, J.; Baus, N.; Huemer, J. Suizid und Suizid-Prävention in Österreich. Basisbericht 2013; Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Vienna, Austria, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Müller, A.; Claes, L.; Smits, D.; Brähler, E.; De Zwaan, M. Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Harm in the German General Population. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Akkaya-Kalayci, T.; Popow, C.; Waldhör, T.; Winkler, D.; Özlü-Erkilic, Z. Psychiatric emergencies of minors with and without migration background. Neuropsychiatry 2016, 31, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Boyer, L.; Henry, J.-M.; Samuelian, J.-C.; Belzeaux, R.; Auquier, P.; Lançon, C.; Da Fonseca, D. Mental Disorders among Children and Adolescents Admitted to a French Psychiatric Emergency Service. Emerg. Med. Int. 2013, 2013, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grupp-Phelan, J.; Mahajan, P.; Foltin, G.L.; Jacobs, E.; Tunik, M.; Sonnett, M.; Miller, S.; Dayan, P. Referral and Resource Use Patterns for Psychiatric-Related Visits to Pediatric Emergency Departments. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2009, 25, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Nock, M.; Favazza, A. Non-suicidal self-injury: Definition and classification. In Understanding Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Origins, Assessment, and Treatment; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nock, M.K. Actions speak louder than words: An elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors. Appl. Prev. Psychol. 2008, 12, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Borges, G.; Orozco, R.; Benjet, C.; Medina-Mora, M.-E. Suicide and suicidal behaviors in Mexico: Retrospective and current status. Salud Pública De México 2010, 52, 133–154. [Google Scholar]
  10. Branley-Bell, D.; O’Connor, A.R.; Green, J.A.; Ferguson, E.; O’Carroll, R.E.; O’Connor, R.C. Distinguishing suicide ideation from suicide attempts: Further test of the Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019, 117, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akkaya-Kalayci, T.; Kapusta, N.D.; Winkler, D.; Kothgassner, O.D.; Popow, C.; Özlü-Erkilic, Z. Triggers for attempted suicide in Istanbul youth, with special reference to their socio-demographic background. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pr. 2017, 22, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Akkaya-Kalayci, T.; Popow, C.; Waldhör, T.; Özlü-Erkilic, Z. Impact of religious feast days on youth suicide attempts in Istanbul, Turkey. Neuropsychiatry 2015, 29, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Akkaya-Kalayci, T.; Popow, C.; Winkler, D.; Bingöl, R.H.; Demir, T.; Özlü, Z. The impact of migration and culture on suicide attempts of children and adolescents living in Istanbul. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pr. 2014, 19, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nock, M.K.; Mendes, W.B. Physiological arousal, distress tolerance, and social problem-solving deficits among adolescent self-injurers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2008, 76, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Özdel, O.; Varma, G.; Atesci, F.C.; Oguzhanoglu, N.K.; Karadag, F.; Amuk, T. Characteristics of suicidal behaviour in a Turkish sample. Crisis 2009, 30, 90–93. [Google Scholar]
  16. Athani, P.; Hugar, B.S.; Harish, S.; Girishchandra, Y. Pattern of unnatural deaths among children: An autopsy study. Medico-Legal J. 2016, 85, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Barak, Y.; Cheung, G.; Fortune, S.; Glue, P. No country for older men: Ageing male suicide in New Zealand. Australas. Psychiatry 2020, 28, 383–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. A Yilmaz, T.; Riecher-Rössler, A. Suicid attempts among first and second generation immigrants. Neuropsychiatry 2008, 22, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsypes, A.; Owens, M.; Hajcak, G.; Gibb, B.E. Neural responses to gains and losses in children of suicide attempters. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2017, 126, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Valtonen, H.M.; Suominen, K.; Mantere, O.; Leppämäki, S.; Arvilommi, P.; Isometsä, E.T. Prospective study of risk factors for attempted suicide among patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2006, 8, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carroll, R.; Metcalfe, C.; Gunnell, D. Hospital Presenting Self-Harm and Risk of Fatal and Non-Fatal Repetition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roy, A.; Janal, M. Family history of suicide, female sex, and childhood trauma: Separate or interacting risk factors for attempts at suicide? Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2005, 112, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Baier, D.; Rehbein, F. Parenting and deviant behaviour. A comparison of gender and familiy structures. Z. Soziologie Erzieh. Sozial. 2013, 33, 399–416. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wasserman, L.; Shaw, T.; Vu, M.T.; Ko, C.; Bollegala, D.; Bhalerao, S. An overview of traumatic brain injury and suicide. Brain Inj. 2008, 22, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Evans, E.; Hawton, K.; Rodham, K. Factors associated with suicidal phenomena in adolescents: A systematic review of population-based studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 24, 957–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vajda, J.; Steinbeck, K. Factors associated with repeat suicide attempts among adolescents. Psychiatry 2000, 34, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Evans, E.; Hawton, K.; Rodham, K. In what ways are adolescents who engage in self-harm or experience thoughts of self-harm different in terms of help-seeking, communication and coping strategies? J. Adolesc. 2005, 28, 573–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Moore, B. Teenage suicide: Prevention is better than cure. Nue Comment 2000, 4, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Donald, M.; Dower, J.; Correa-Velez, I.; Jones, M. Risk and Protective Factors for Medically Serious Suicide Attempts: A Comparison of Hospital-Based with Population-Based Samples of Young Adults. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2006, 40, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaess, M.; Brunner, R.; Parzer, P.; Edanackaparampil, M.; Schmidt, J.; Kirisgil, M.; Fischer, G.; Wewetzer, C.; Lehmkuhl, G.; Resch, F. Association of Adolescent Dimensional Borderline Personality Pathology with Past and Current Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Lifetime Suicidal Behavior: A Clinical Multicenter Study. Psychopathology 2016, 49, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vijayakumar, L.; Kumar, M.S.; Vijayakumar, V. Substance use and suicide. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2011, 24, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bazrafshan, M.-R.; Sharif, F.; Molazem, Z.; Mani, A. The Effect of Paternal Addiction on Adolescent Suicide Attempts: A Qualitative Study. Int. J. High Risk Behav. Addict. 2016, 5, 22588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Johnson, J.G.; Cohen, P.; Gould, M.S.; Kasen, S.; Brown, J.; Brook, J.S. Childhood adversities, interpersonal difficulties, and risk for suicide attempts during late adolescence and early adulthood. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2002, 59, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, Y.J.; Moon, S.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.K. Risk Factors and Mediators of Suicidal Ideation Among Korean Adolescents. Crisis 2018, 39, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. O’Connor, R.C.; Rasmussen, S.; Hawton, K. Predicting Deliberate Self-Harm in Adolescents: A Six Month Prospective Study. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav. 2009, 39, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. King, M.; Semlyen, J.K.; Tai, S.S.; Killaspy, H.; Osborn, D.; Popelyuk, D.; Nazareth, I. A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC Psychiatry 2008, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. O’Connor, R.C.; Rasmussen, S.; Hawton, K. Distinguishing adolescents who think about self-harm from those who engage in self-harm. Br. J. Psychiatry 2012, 200, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Boergers, J.; Spirito, A.; Donaldson, D. Reasons for Adolescent Suicide Attempts: Associations With Psychological Functioning. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1998, 37, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. O’Connor, R.C.; Rasmussen, S.; Hawton, K. Predicting depression, anxiety and self-harm in adolescents: The role of perfectionism and acute life stress. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Kloet, L.; Starling, J.; Hainsworth, C.; Berntsen, E.; Chapman, L.; Hancock, K. Risk Factors for Self-Harm in Children and Adolescents Admitted to a Mental Health Inpatient Unit. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2011, 45, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fergusson, D.M.; Woodward, L.J.; Horwood, L.J. Risk factors and life processes associated with the onset of suicidal behaviour during adolescence and early adulthood. Psychol. Med. 2000, 30, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spears, M.; Montgomery, A.; Gunnell, D.; Araya, R. Factors associated with the development of self-harm amongst a socio-economically deprived cohort of adolescents in Santiago, Chile. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2013, 49, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lipsicas, C.B.; Mäkinen, I.H.; Apter, A.; De Leo, D.; Kerkhof, A.; Lönnqvist, J.; Michel, K.; Renberg, E.S.; Sayil, I.; Schmidtke, A.; et al. Attempted suicide among immigrants in European countries: An international perspective. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2011, 47, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Burger, I.; Van Hemert, A.M.; Schudel, W.J.; Middelkoop, B.J. Suicidal Behavior in Four Ethnic Groups in The Hague, 2002–2004. Crisis 2009, 30, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Borowsky, I.W.; Ireland, M.; Resnick, M.D. Adolescent suicide attempts: Risks and protectors. Pediatrics 2001, 107, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Plener, P.L.; Munz, L.M.; Allroggen, M.; Kapusta, N.D.; Fegert, M.J.M.; Groschwitz, R.C. Immigration as risk factor for non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts in adolescents in Germany. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Heal. 2015, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Straiton, M.; Aambø, A.K.; Johansen, R. Perceived discrimination, health and mental health among immigrants in Norway: The role of moderating factors. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Burrows, S.; Laflamme, L. Socioeconomic disparities and attempted suicide: State of knowledge and implications for research and prevention. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2010, 17, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Madge, N.J.H.; Hewitt, A.; Hawton, K.; De Wilde, E.J.; Corcoran, P.; Fekete, S.; Van Heeringen, K.; De Leo, D.; Ystgaard, M. Deliberate self-harm within an international community sample of young people: Comparative findings from the Child & Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) Study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2008, 49, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Statistics Austria, Migration & Integration - Zahlen.Daten.Indikatoren 2019. Available online: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjr0LvIrNbrAhUQUa0KHRTLD2wQFjAAegQIAhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.integrationsfonds.at%2Ffileadmin%2Fcontent%2FAT%2FDownloads%2FPublikationen%2FMigration-Integration-2019_final.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0JpAQhrmXPuSD60eBwOnN7 (accessed on 8 April 2019).
  51. Weiss, M.G.; Ramakrishna, J. Stigma interventions and research for international health. Lancet 2006, 367, 536–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Statistics Austria. Migration & Integration 2019; Bundesministerium Inneres: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  53. IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0; Armonk. IBM Corporation: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bland, J.M.; Altman, U.G. Statistics Notes: The odds ratio. BMJ 2000, 320, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Corrigall, R.; Bhugra, D. The role of ethnicity and diagnosis in rates of adolescent psychiatric admission and compulsory detention: A longitudinal case-note study. J. R. Soc. Med. 2013, 106, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mulder, C.L.; Koopmans, G.T.; Selten, J.-P. Emergency psychiatry, compulsory admissions and clinical presentation among immigrants to the Netherlands. Br. J. Psychiatry 2006, 188, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Stansfeld, S.A.; Haines, M.M.; Head, J.A.; Bhui, K.; Viner, R.; Taylor, S.J.C.; Hillier, S.; Klineberg, E.; Booy, R. Ethnicity, social deprivation and psychological distress in adolescents. Br. J. Psychiatry 2004, 185, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stronks, K.; Ravelli, A.C.; Reijneveld, S. Immigrants in the Netherlands: Equal access for equal needs? J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 2001, 55, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Alegria, M.; Vallas, M.; Pumariega, A.J. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Mental Health. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 19, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Cummings, J.R.; Druss, B.G. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Service Use Among Adolescents With Major Depression. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2011, 50, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cummings, J.R.; Ponce, N.; Mays, V.M. Comparing Racial/Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Service Use Among High-Need Subpopulations Across Clinical and School-Based Settings. J. Adolesc. Heal. 2010, 46, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Elster, A.; Jarosik, J.; VanGeest, J.; Fleming, M. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care for Adolescents. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2003, 157, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fassaert, T.; Wit, M.A.S.D.; Verhoeff, A.; Tuinebreijer, W.; Gorissen, W.H.; Beekman, A.T.F.; Dekker, J. Uptake of health services for common mental disorders by first-generation Turkish and Moroccan migrants in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. García, C.M.; Gilchrist, L.; Vazquez, G.; Leite, A.; Raymond, N. Urban and Rural Immigrant Latino Youths’ and Adults’ Knowledge and Beliefs about Mental Health Resources. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2010, 13, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Garland, A.F.; Lau, A.S.; Yeh, M.; McCabe, K.; Hough, R.L.; Landsverk, J. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Utilization of Mental Health Services Among High-Risk Youths. Am. J. Psychiatry 2005, 162, 1336–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. O’Donnell, L.; O’Donnell, C.; Wardlaw, D.M.; Stueve, A. Risk and resiliency factors influencing suicidality among urban African American and Latino youth. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2004, 33, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sen, B.P. Adolescent propensity for depressed mood and help seeking: Race and gender differences. J. Ment. Heal. Policy Econ. 2004, 7, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
  68. Weinick, R.M.; Krauss, N.A. Racial/Ethnic differences in children’s access to care. Am. J. Public Health 2000, 90, 1771–1774. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Wilson, K.M.; Klein, J.D. Adolescents who use the emergency department as their usual source of care. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2000, 154, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Jaeger, F.N.; Hossain, M.; Kiss, L.; Zimmerman, C. The health of migrant children in Switzerland. Int. J. Public Heal. 2012, 57, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dogra, N.; Singh, S.P.; Svirydzenka, N.; Vostanis, P. Mental health problems in children and young people from minority ethnic groups: The need for targeted research. Br. J. Psychiatry 2012, 200, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Donath, C.; Graessel, E.; Baier, D.; Bleich, S.; Hillemacher, T. Is parenting style a predictor of suicide attempts in a representative sample of adolescents? BMC Pediatr. 2014, 14, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Razum, O.; Zeeb, H. Suicide mortality among Turks in Germany. Nervenarzt 2004, 75, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Schouler-Ocak, M.; Aichberger, M.; Yesil, R.; Montesinos, A.H.; Bromand, Z.; Termur-Erman, S.; Rapp, M.; Heinz, A. Suicide Rates and Suicide Prevention in Women of Turkish Origin in Berlin. Gesundheitswesen 2015, 77, S31–S32. [Google Scholar]
  75. Yilmaz, A.T.; Riecher-Rössler, A. Attempted Suicide in Immigrants from Turkey: A Comparison with Swiss Suicide Attempters. Psychopathology 2012, 45, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cuffe, S.P.; Waller, J.L.; Cuccaro, M.L.; Pumariega, A.J.; Garrison, C.Z. Race and Gender Differences in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Young Adolescents. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1995, 34, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Van Bergen, D.D.; Eikelenboom, M.; Smit, J.H.; Van De Looij-Jansen, P.M.; Saharso, S. Suicidal behavior and ethnicity of young females in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Rates and risk factors. Ethn. Health 2010, 15, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Doganay, Z.; Sunter, A.T.; Guz, H.; Ozkan, A.; Altintop, L.; Kati, C.; Colak, E.; Aygun, D.; Guven, H. Climatic and diurnal variation in suicide attempts in the ED. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2003, 21, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Elisei, S.; Verdolini, N.; Anastasi, S. Suicidal attempts among Emergency Department patients: One-year of clinical experience. Psychiatr. Danub. 2012, 24, S140–S142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Monnin, J.; Thiemard, E.; Vandel, P.; Nicolier, M.; Tio, G.; Courtet, P.; Bellivier, F.; Sechter, D.; Haffen, E. Sociodemographic and psychopathological risk factors in repeated suicide attempts: Gender differences in a prospective study. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 136, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Rancic, N.; Ignjatovic-Ristic, D.; Radovanović, S.; Kocic, S.; Radevic, S. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients after suicide attempt: A twenty-year retrospective study. Med. Glas. Off. Publ. Med Assoc. Zenica-Doboj Canton 2012, 9, 350–365. [Google Scholar]
  82. Tezcan, A.E.; Oguzhanoglu, N.K.; Ülkeroglu, F. Cocuk ve genclerde intihar girisimleri. Kriz Dergisi 1995, 3, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hawton, K.; Rodham, K.; Evans, E.; Weatherall, R. Deliberate self harm in adolescents: Self report survey in schools in England. BMJ 2002, 325, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Olfson, M.; Gameroff, M.J.; Marcus, S.C.; Greenberg, T.; Shaffer, D. Emergency Treatment of Young People Following Deliberate Self-harm. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2005, 62, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. McHugh, C.M.; Lee, R.S.C.; Hermens, D.F.; Corderoy, A.; Large, M.; Hickie, I.B. Impulsivity in the self-harm and suicidal behavior of young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019, 116, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nadeau, L.; Measham, T. Immigrants and mental health services: Increasing collaboration with other service providers. Can. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Rev. 2005, 14, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  87. Donath, C.; Bergmann, M.C.; Kliem, S.; Hillemacher, T.; Baier, D. Epidemiology of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and direct self-injurious behavior in adolescents with a migration background: A representative study. BMC Pediatr. 2019, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Parr, G.R.; Gardner, L.K.; E Steflik, D.; Sisk, A.L.; Hanes, P.J. Comparative implant research in dogs: Prosthodontic protocol using two-stage ceramic endosseous dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1992, 7, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Yeh, C.; Inose, M. Difficulties and coping strategies of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean immigrant students. Adolescence 2002, 37, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Çeri, V.; Özlü-Erkilic, Z.; Ozer, U.; Kadak, T.; Winkler, D.; Dogangun, B.; Akkaya-Kalayci, T. Mental health problems of second generation children and adolescents with migration background. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2017, 21, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kletecka-Pulker, M.; Parrag, S.; Drožđek, B.; Wenzel, T. Language Barriers and the Role of Interpreters: A Challenge in the Work with Migrants and Refugees. In An Uncertain Safety; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 345–361. [Google Scholar]
  92. Spallek, J.; Razum, O. Health of migrants: Deficiencies in the field of prevention. Med Klin 2007, 102, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Solemn Proclamation. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  94. Oppedal, B.; Røysamb, E. Mental health, life stress and social support among young Norwegian adolescents with immigrant and host national background. Scand. J. Psychol. 2004, 45, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Akkaya-Kalayci, T. Die Bedeutung transkultureller Kompetenz in der Psychiatrie The importance of transcultural competence in psychiatry. Psychopraxis Neuropraxis 2017, 20, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lipsicas, C.B.; Mäkinen, I.H. Immigration and suicidality in the young. Can. J. Psychiatry 2010, 55, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Stevens, G.W.; Vollebergh, W. Mental health in migrant children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2008, 49, 276–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Study sample.
Table 1. Study sample.
GenderAustrian
Patients		Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian-Speaking PatientsTurkish-Speaking PatientsTotal
n%n%n%n%
Female45156.410363.29371.564759.2
Male34943.66036.83728.544640.8
Total8001001631001301001093100
Table
Table 2. Referral reasons in the different patient groups at admission time.
Table 2. Referral reasons in the different patient groups at admission time.
Referral ReasonsAustrian
Patients
(n = 800)		Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian-Speaking Patients
(n = 163)		Turkish-
Speaking
Patients
(n = 130)		Total
(n = 1093)
n%n%n%n%
Psychosis 91.131.821.5141.3
Alcohol intoxication121.50-0-121.1
Drug intoxication283.584.90-363.3
Suicide attempt88112716.63023.114513.3
Suicidal ideation961274.375.411010.1
Self-harming behaviour354.463.764.6474.3
Acute stress disorder16720.931192418.522220.3
Depressive episode556.953.11612.3767
Anxiety and Panic disorder789.8169.81713.111110.2
Child abuse20.221.210.850.5
Eating disorder445.584.921.5544.9
Pain374.61381310635.8
Behavioural disorder11814.82414.7107.715213.9
School refusal 172.184.90-252.3
Sexual abuse 141.842.521.5201.8
Personality disorders0-10.60-10.1
Total8001001631001301001093100
Table
Table 3. Triggering factors for the suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour of three patient groups.
Table 3. Triggering factors for the suicide attempts and self-harming behaviour of three patient groups.
Triggering FactorsAustrian
Patients
(n = 123)		Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian -Speaking Patients
(n = 33)		Turkish- Speaking Patients
(n = 36)		Total (n = 192)
SASHSASHSASHSASH
n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%
Intrafamilial problems3438.61851.41555.63501756.73506645.52451.1
Relationship/separation crises1517411.4933.3116.76200-3020.7510.6
Trauma22.325.70-0-0-0-21.424.3
Problems at school 1618.2617.113.7116.726.73501913.11021.3
Psychological disorder1415.9411.413.7116.70-0-1510.3510.6
Problems with peers 22.30-13.70-26.70-53.40-
Burdens due to physical disorders0-12.90-0-13.30-10.712.1
Unknown reason 55.70-0-0-26.70-74.80-
Total 881003510027100610030100610014510047100
SA = suicide attempt, SH = self-harming behaviour.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Özlü-Erkilic, Z.; Wenzel, T.; Kothgassner, O.D.; Akkaya-Kalayci, T. Transcultural Differences in Risk Factors and in Triggering Reasons of Suicidal and Self-Harming Behaviour in Young People with and without a Migration Background. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186498

AMA Style

Özlü-Erkilic Z, Wenzel T, Kothgassner OD, Akkaya-Kalayci T. Transcultural Differences in Risk Factors and in Triggering Reasons of Suicidal and Self-Harming Behaviour in Young People with and without a Migration Background. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(18):6498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Özlü-Erkilic, Zeliha, Thomas Wenzel, Oswald D. Kothgassner, and Türkan Akkaya-Kalayci. 2020. "Transcultural Differences in Risk Factors and in Triggering Reasons of Suicidal and Self-Harming Behaviour in Young People with and without a Migration Background" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 18: 6498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186498

APA Style

Özlü-Erkilic, Z., Wenzel, T., Kothgassner, O. D., & Akkaya-Kalayci, T. (2020). Transcultural Differences in Risk Factors and in Triggering Reasons of Suicidal and Self-Harming Behaviour in Young People with and without a Migration Background. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop