Next Article in Journal
Weight Stigmatization and Binge Eating in Asian Americans with Overweight and Obesity
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis and Application of Drought Characteristics Based on Theory of Runs and Copulas in Yunnan, Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Specific Relapse Predictors: Could Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Smoking Cessation Be Improved?
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Acute Erythromycin Exposure on the Swimming Ability of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Open AccessArticle

Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Water Bodies around Typical Copper Mines in China

by 1, 1,*, 2,3 and 4,5,*
1
College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2
School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
3
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
4
College of Water Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
5
China Geological Environment Monitoring Institute, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(12), 4315; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124315
Received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 10 June 2020 / Accepted: 11 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Resources and Hydro-Ecology)
In order to understand the heavy metal pollution status and ecological effect in aquatic environment around copper mine areas, seven heavy metals (Cd, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Zn, the Ni, and Pb) in aquatic environments in seven representative copper mine regions were selected from the literature in 2005–2013 for ecological risk assessment by using potential ecological risk index, geoaccumulation index, nemerow index and species sensitivity distribution method (Potential Affected Fraction (PAF) and Multi-Substance PAF (MSPAF)). The results of sediment ecological risk analysis showed that Cd, Cu and Pb were the main pollutants in sediments. The results of species sensitivity distribution analysis showed that the HC5 values (Hazardous Concentration for 5% of species) of seven heavy metals were different with order Zn > Cr > Cd > Pb > Cu > Ni > Hg. The MSPAF of seven copper mines in the following order with species sensitivity distribution method was as follows: Dabaoshan (99%) = Dahongshan (99%) = Baiyin (99%) > Dexing (97%) > Jinchuan (92%) > Tongling (39%) > Daye (24%). This study analyzes the impact of copper mining on the aquatic environment, and the results of this study will be great value for the comprehensive pollution governance of mining. View Full-Text
Keywords: copper mine; heavy metal; ecological risk; species sensitivity distribution copper mine; heavy metal; ecological risk; species sensitivity distribution
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Feng, W.; Li, X. Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Water Bodies around Typical Copper Mines in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4315.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop