Next Article in Journal
The Nexus between Workplace Exposure for Wood, Welding, Motor Mechanic, and Oil Refinery Workers and the Prevalence of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Next Article in Special Issue
Reliability of IMU-Derived Static Balance Parameters in Neurological Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Responsible Job Design Based on the Internal Social Responsibility of Local Governments
Review

A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring

1
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
2
Department of Technologies, Ryder Architecture, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 3NN, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 3995; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995
Received: 30 April 2020 / Revised: 29 May 2020 / Accepted: 2 June 2020 / Published: 4 June 2020
Indoor environment quality (IEQ) can negatively affect occupant health and wellbeing. Air quality, as well as thermal, visual and auditory conditions, can determine how comfortable occupants feel within buildings. Some can be measured objectively, but many are assessed by interpreting qualitative responses. Continuous monitoring by passive sensors may be useful to identify links between environmental and physiological changes. Few studies localise measurements to an occupant level perhaps due to many environmental monitoring solutions being large and expensive. Traditional models for occupant comfort analysis often exacerbate this by not differentiating between individual building occupants. This scoping review aims to understand IEQ and explore approaches as to how it is measured with various sensing technologies, identifying trends for monitoring occupant health and wellbeing. Twenty-seven studies were reviewed, and more than 60 state-of-the-art and low-cost IEQ sensors identified. Studies were found to focus on the home or workplace, but not both. This review also found how wearable technology could be used to augment IEQ measurements, creating personalised approaches to health and wellbeing. Opportunities exist to make individuals the primary unit of analysis. Future research should explore holistic personalised approaches to health monitoring in buildings that analyse the individual as they move between environments. View Full-Text
Keywords: commercial building; residential building; Internet of Things (IoT); health; wellbeing; indoor environment quality (IEQ) commercial building; residential building; Internet of Things (IoT); health; wellbeing; indoor environment quality (IEQ)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Coulby, G.; Clear, A.; Jones, O.; Godfrey, A. A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995

AMA Style

Coulby G, Clear A, Jones O, Godfrey A. A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11):3995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coulby, Graham, Adrian Clear, Oliver Jones, and Alan Godfrey. 2020. "A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11: 3995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop