Next Article in Journal
Restless Legs Syndrome across the Lifespan: Symptoms, Pathophysiology, Management and Daily Life Impact of the Different Patterns of Disease Presentation
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Plyometric versus Ankle Stability Exercises on Lower Limb Biomechanics in Taekwondo Demonstration Athletes with Functional Ankle Instability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selfie-Viewing and Facial Dissatisfaction among Emerging Adults: A Moderated Mediation Model of Appearance Comparisons and Self-Objectification
Open AccessCommunication

The Conceptual and Methodological Mayhem of “Screen Time”

1
Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK
2
Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3AP, UK
3
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK
4
School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
5
Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
6
Graduate School of Education, University of Western Australia, 6009 Perth, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(10), 3661; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103661
Received: 23 April 2020 / Revised: 20 May 2020 / Accepted: 21 May 2020 / Published: 22 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychosocial Impacts of New Technologies and the Internet)
Debates concerning the impacts of screen time are widespread. Existing research presents mixed findings, and lacks longitudinal evidence for any causal or long-term effects. We present a critical account of the current shortcomings of the screen time literature. These include poor conceptualisation, the use of non-standardised measures that are predominantly self-report, and issues with measuring screen time over time and context. Based on these issues, we make a series of recommendations as a basis for furthering academic and public debate. These include drawing on a user-focused approach in order to seek the various affordances gained from “screen use”. Within this, we can better understand the way in which these vary across time and context, and make distinction between objective measures of “screen time” compared to those more subjective experiences of uses or affordances, and the differential impacts these may bring. View Full-Text
Keywords: screen time; screen use; well-being; social media; self-reports; methods; affordances screen time; screen use; well-being; social media; self-reports; methods; affordances
MDPI and ACS Style

K. Kaye, L.; Orben, A.; A. Ellis, D.; C. Hunter, S.; Houghton, S. The Conceptual and Methodological Mayhem of “Screen Time”. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3661.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop