Next Article in Journal
Combined Toxicity of Nitro-Substituted Benzenes and Zinc to Photobacterium Phosphoreum: Evaluation and QSAR Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Hierarchical Urban Parks by Multi-Types of Travel Distance in Shenzhen, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Information Sharing and Investment Performance in the Venture Capital Network Community: An Empirical Study of Environmental-Social-Governance Start-Ups
Article Menu
Issue 6 (March-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts

1
School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710100, China
2
Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(6), 1039; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061039
Received: 21 February 2019 / Revised: 16 March 2019 / Accepted: 17 March 2019 / Published: 22 March 2019
  |  
PDF [3761 KB, uploaded 22 March 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Based on the Graph Model of Conflict Resolution (GMCR), a two-stage decision framework is developed to reveal the essence of brownfield incidents and facilitate the resolution of brownfield conflicts caused by the incidents. More particularly, the forward GMCR is utilized in Stage I, the negotiation stage, to simulate the evolution of a Brownfield Conflict (BC) and predict its potential resolution via stability analysis. If no acceptable equilibrium can be obtained, the BC progresses into Stage II, the third-party-intervention stage, where the inverse GMCR is used to assist a third party in intervening the conflict to achieve a desirable outcome. To illustrate the practicality of this framework, a recent BC that occurred in Changzhou, China, is taken as a case study. Invaluable insights are provided through the computation and investigation of the corresponding preference relationships. View Full-Text
Keywords: graph model of conflict resolution; brownfields; inverse problem; negotiation; third party intervention graph model of conflict resolution; brownfields; inverse problem; negotiation; third party intervention
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Ke, G.Y.; Lin, H. A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1039.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top