A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts
AbstractBased on the Graph Model of Conflict Resolution (GMCR), a two-stage decision framework is developed to reveal the essence of brownfield incidents and facilitate the resolution of brownfield conflicts caused by the incidents. More particularly, the forward GMCR is utilized in Stage I, the negotiation stage, to simulate the evolution of a Brownfield Conflict (BC) and predict its potential resolution via stability analysis. If no acceptable equilibrium can be obtained, the BC progresses into Stage II, the third-party-intervention stage, where the inverse GMCR is used to assist a third party in intervening the conflict to achieve a desirable outcome. To illustrate the practicality of this framework, a recent BC that occurred in Changzhou, China, is taken as a case study. Invaluable insights are provided through the computation and investigation of the corresponding preference relationships. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Han, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Ke, G.Y.; Lin, H. A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1039.
Han Q, Zhu Y, Ke GY, Lin H. A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(6):1039.Chicago/Turabian Style
Han, Qingye; Zhu, Yuming; Ke, Ginger Y.; Lin, Hongli. 2019. "A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, no. 6: 1039.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.