Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Data Collection and Methodology
3. Results
3.1. Conjoint Analysis
3.2. Frequency Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Di Vita, G.; Bracco, S.; D’Amico, M. Mapping the italian cured meats’attributes: A qualitative approach. Qual.-Access Success 2017, 18, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
- Xazela, N.M.; Hugo, A.; Marume, U.; Muchenje, V. Perceptions of rural consumers on the aspects of meat quality and health implications associated with meat consumption. Sustainability 2017, 9, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Sabate, R.; Sabaté, J.; Sanchez-Sabate, R.; Sabaté, J. Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Massaglia, S.; Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D. Marketing strategies for animal welfare meat identification: Comparison of preferences between millennial and conventional consumers. Qual.-Access Success 2018, 19, 305–311. [Google Scholar]
- Mancuso, T.; Verduna, T.; Blanc, S.; Di Vita, G.; Brun, F. Environmental sustainability and economic matters of commercial types of common wheat. Agric. Econ. 2019, 65, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menyanu, E.; Russell, J.; Charlton, K.; Menyanu, E.; Russell, J.; Charlton, K. Dietary Sources of Salt in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sparks, E.; Paterson, K.; Santos, J.; Trieu, K.; Hinge, N.; Tarivonda, L.; Snowdon, W.; Johnson, C.; Webster, J.; Sparks, E.; et al. Salt-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors on Efate Island, Vanuatu. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toldrá, F.; Reig, M. Innovations for healthier processed meats. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, B.M.; Gremaud, G.; Hadorn, R.; Kreuzer, M. Geographic origin of meat-elements of an analytical approach to its authentication. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Lee, J. Application of Sensory Descriptive Analysis and Consumer Studies to Investigate Traditional and Authentic Foods: A Review. Foods 2019, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loureiro, M.L.; Umberger, W.J. Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country-of-origin labeling. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2003, 28, 287–301. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, K.H.; Hu, W.; Maynard, L.J.; Goddard, E.U.S. Consumers’ Preference and Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin-Labeled Beef Steak and Food Safety Enhancements. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2013, 61, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hersleth, M.; Næs, T.; Rødbotten, M.; Lind, V.; Monteleone, E. Lamb meat-Importance of origin and grazing system for italian and norwegian consumers. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conter, M.; Zanardi, E.; Ghidini, S.; Pennisi, L.; Vergara, A.; Campanini, G.; Ianieri, A. Consumers’ behaviour toward typical Italian dry sausages. Food Control 2008, 19, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balogh, P.; Békési, D.; Gorton, M.; Popp, J.; Lengyel, P. Consumer willingness to pay for traditional food products. Food Policy 2016, 61, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iaccarino, T.; Di Monaco, R.; Mincione, A.; Cavella, S.; Masi, P. Influence of information on origin and technology on the consumer response: The case of soppressata salami. Food Qual. Prefer. 2006, 17, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Platania, M.; Privitera, D. Typical products and consumer preferences: The “soppressata” case. Br. Food J. 2006, 108, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Almeida, M.; Montes, N.; Saldaña, E.; Pinto, J.; Contreras-Castillo, C.J. Are sensory attributes and acceptance influenced by nutritional and health claims of low-sodium salami? Preliminary study with Brazilian consumers. Sci. Agropecu. 2017, 8, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzone, L.; Di Vita, G.; Borla, S.; D’Amico, M. When Consumers and Products Come from the Same Place: Preferences and WTP for Geographical Indication Differ across Regional Identity Groups. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2016, 28, 286–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Merlino, V.M.; Massaglia, S.; Borra, D. Analysis of european consumer awareness for identifying animal-friendly meat. Qual.-Access Success 2019, 20, 388–395. [Google Scholar]
- Di Vita, G.; D’Amico, M.; Lombardi, A.; Pecorino, B. Evaluating trends of low sodium content in food: The willingness to pay for salt-reduced bread, a case study. Agric. Econ. Rev. 2016, 17, 82–99. [Google Scholar]
- Torquati, B.; Tempesta, T.; Vecchiato, D.; Venanzi, S. Tasty or sustainable? The effect of product sensory experience on a sustainable new food product: An application of discrete choice experiments on Chianina tinned beef. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Bogue, J. Concept optimisation of fermented functional cereal beverages. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 541–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, D.N.; Evans, G.; Lease, H.J. The influence of product attributes, consumer attitudes and characteristics on the acceptance of: (1) Novel bread and milk, and dietary supplements and (2) fish and novel meats as dietary vehicles of long chain omega 3 fatty acids. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, L.C.; De Brún, A.; Henchion, M.; Li, C.; Murrin, C.; Wall, P.G.; Monahan, F.J. Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier—A conjoint analysis study. Meat Sci. 2017, 131, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sebranek, J.G.; Bacus, J.N. Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate or nitrite: What are the issues? Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inguglia, E.S.; Zhang, Z.; Tiwari, B.K.; Kerry, J.P.; Burgess, C.M. Salt reduction strategies in processed meat products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 59, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guàrdia, M.D.; Guerrero, L.; Gelabert, J.; Gou, P.; Arnau, J. Consumer attitude towards sodium reduction in meat products and acceptability of fermented sausages with reduced sodium content. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Vita, G.; Blanc, S.; Brun, F.; Bracco, S.; D’Amico, M. Quality attributes and harmful components of cured meats: Exploring the attitudes of Italian consumers towards healthier cooked ham. Meat Sci. 2019, 155, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lingua, F.; Mosso, A.; Brun, F.; Blanc, S. A Survey of Innovative Training Preferences Among Italian Loggers. Small-Scale For. 2019, 18, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bundros, J.; Clifford, D.; Silliman, K.; Neyman Morris, M. Prevalence of Orthorexia nervosa among college students based on Bratman’s test and associated tendencies. Appetite 2016, 101, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loureiro, M.L.; Umberger, W.J. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 2007, 32, 496–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caracciolo, F.; D’Amico, M.; Di Vita, G.; Pomarici, E.; Bianco, A.D.; Cembalo, L. Private vs. collective wine reputation. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2016, 19, 191–210. [Google Scholar]
- Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D.; Verduna, T.; Massaglia, S. Household behavior with respect to meat consumption: Differences between households with and without children. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pires, M.A.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Baldin, J.C.; Rocha, Y.J.P.; Carvalho, L.T.; Dos Santos, I.R.; Barros, J.C.; Trindade, M.A. The effect of sodium reduction on the microstructure, texture and sensory acceptance of Bologna sausage. Food Struct. 2017, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, Y.; Verbeke, W.; De Kok, T.M. Stakeholder and consumer reactions towards innovative processed meat products: Insights from a qualitative study about nitrite reduction and phytochemical addition. Food Control. 2016, 60, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D.; Girgenti, V.; Dal Vecchio, A.; Massaglia, S. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes. Meat Sci. 2018, 143, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannata, S.; Ratti, S.; Meteau, K.; Mourot, J.; Baldini, P.; Corino, C. Evaluation of different types of dry-cured ham by Italian and French consumers. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureati, M.; Buratti, S.; Giovanelli, G.; Corazzin, M.; Lo Fiego, D.P.; Pagliarini, E. Characterization and differentiation of Italian Parma, San Daniele and Toscano dry-cured hams: A multi-disciplinary approach. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappalardo, G.; Di Vita, G.; La Via, G.; Romano, S.; Vastola, A.; Cozzi, M.; D’Amico, M. Exploring gender differences in the Italian traditional pizza consumption. Econ. Agro-Aliment. 2019, 21, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suki, N.M. Young consumer ecological behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, healthy food, and healthy way of life with the moderation of gender and age. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2013, 24, 726–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Vita, G.; Pappalardo, G.; Chinnici, G.; La Via, G.; D’Amico, M. Not everything has been still explored: Further thoughts on additional price for the organic wine. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D.; Lazzarino, L.L.; Blanc, S. Does the organic certification influence the purchasing decisions of milk consumers? Qual.-Access Success 2019, 20, 382–387. [Google Scholar]
- De Boer, M.; McCarthy, M.; Cowan, C.; Ryan, I. The influence of lifestyle characteristics and beliefs about convenience food on the demand for convenience foods in the Irish market. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Option | Price (€ hg−1) | Low-Salt Content | Presence of Nitrites | National Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.90 | Yes | No | Yes |
2 | 1.30 | Yes | Yes | No |
3 | 3.00 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
4 | 1.90 | No | Yes | No |
5 | 3.00 | No | No | No |
6 | 1.30 | No | No | Yes |
7 | 3.00 | No | Yes | Yes |
8 | 3.00 | Yes | No | No |
Average Importance | Factor | Level | Utility |
---|---|---|---|
43.59% | Price (€/hg) | 1.30 | −0.7929 |
1.90 | 0.2250 | ||
3.00 | 0.5679 | ||
25.96% | Low-salt content | No | −0.4051 |
Yes | 0.4051 | ||
16.40% | Presence of nitrites | Yes | −0.2559 |
No | 0.2559 | ||
14.06% | Origin | Yes | 0.2194 |
No | −0.2194 | ||
Pearson’s R = 0.850 | |||
Kendall’s tau = 0.500 |
Variable | “0” | +10% | +20% | +30% | +50% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||
Gender | Male | 24.7 | 17.5 | 47.5 | 8.7 | 1.5 |
Female | 44.9 | 24.8 | 22.6 | 6.0 | 1.7 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 22,221 | |||||
p value | 0.000 | |||||
Age | 18–29 | 33.7 | 18.7 | 37.4 | 9.6 | 0.5 |
30–39 | 43.7 | 15.5 | 33.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
≥40 | 26.8 | 28.0 | 35.7 | 8.3 | 1.2 | |
Kruskal-Wallis H | 3.135 | |||||
p value | 0.209 | |||||
Sports | No | 35.5 | 24.7 | 32.3 | 6.1 | 1.4 |
Yes | 32.6 | 16.1 | 40.4 | 9.2 | 1.8 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 27,453 | |||||
p value | 0.050 |
Variable | “0” | +10% | +20% | +30% | +50% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||
Gender | Male | 22.4 | 43.0 | 23.2 | 9.1 | 2.3 |
Female | 17.0 | 23.4 | 55.7 | 2.1 | 1.7 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 25,480 | |||||
p value | 0.000 | |||||
Age | 18–29 | 17.1 | 33.2 | 38.5 | 10.2 | 1.1 |
30–39 | 27.5 | 25.4 | 39.4 | 3.5 | 4.2 | |
≥40 | 16.6 | 41.4 | 37.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | |
Kruskal-Wallis H | 3.617 | |||||
p value | 0.164 | |||||
Sport | No | 24.6 | 33.9 | 35.7 | 4.3 | 1.4 |
Yes | 13.8 | 33.5 | 42.2 | 7.8 | 2.8 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 25,555 | |||||
p value | 0.001 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Di Vita, G.; Blanc, S.; Mancuso, T.; Massaglia, S.; La Via, G.; D’Amico, M. Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605
Di Vita G, Blanc S, Mancuso T, Massaglia S, La Via G, D’Amico M. Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(14):2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605
Chicago/Turabian StyleDi Vita, Giuseppe, Simone Blanc, Teresina Mancuso, Stefano Massaglia, Giovanni La Via, and Mario D’Amico. 2019. "Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 14: 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605
APA StyleDi Vita, G., Blanc, S., Mancuso, T., Massaglia, S., La Via, G., & D’Amico, M. (2019). Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605