Next Article in Journal
Mercury Contamination in Riverine Sediments and Fish Associated with Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Madre de Dios, Peru
Next Article in Special Issue
Obesity Inequalities According to Place of Birth: The Role of Education
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiological Investigation of Type 2 Diabetes and Alzheimer’s Disease in a Pakistani Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
Linkage to Care Is Important and Necessary When Identifying Infections in Migrants
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

A Systematic Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge, Experiences and Access to Services among Refugee, Migrant and Displaced Girls and Young Women in Africa

Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Centre of the University of Munich (LMU), 80802 Munich, Germany
Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(8), 1583;
Submission received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 22 July 2018 / Accepted: 23 July 2018 / Published: 26 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Refugee, Migrant and Ethnic Minority Health)


Adolescent girls and young women are an overlooked group within conflict- or disaster-affected populations, and their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs are often neglected. Existing evidence shows that forced migration and human mobility make girls and women more vulnerable to poor SRH outcomes such as high risk sexual behaviors, lack of contraception use, STIs and HIV/AIDS. We performed a systematic literature review to explore knowledge, experiences and access to SRH services in this population group across the African continent. Two databases (PubMed and Web of Science) were searched and from 896 identified publications, 15 peer-reviewed articles published in English met the inclusion criteria for this review. These consisted of eight applied qualitative, five quantitative and two mixed-method study designs. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the mixed-methods appraisal tool (MMAT) using scores in percentages (0–100%). Available evidence indicates that knowledge of young women and girls regarding contraceptive methods, STIs and HIV/AIDS are limited. This population group often experiences gender-based and sexual violence and abuse. The access and availability of SRH services are often limited due to distances, costs and stigma. This review demonstrates that there is still a dearth of peer-reviewed literature on SRH related aspects among refugee, migrant and displaced girls and young women in Africa. The data disaggregation by sex and age should be emphasized for future research in this field.

1. Introduction

Every year, thousands of people around the world flee their homes to escape conflict, disasters and violence within their own country or by crossing international borders. During these humanitarian emergencies, refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) suffer a great pressure which affects their health. Adolescent girls and young women (10–24 years old) are an overlooked group within conflict- or disaster-affected populations, and their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs remain largely unmet [1]. As such, the synergy of crisis as well as the neglect of SRH needs, increases vulnerability of adolescent girls to unwanted pregnancies, HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), maternal death and sexual violence [2,3,4]. Adolescent girls in humanitarian settings experience increased exposure to early and forced marriage, coerced sex and early childbearing, as well as increased risk-taking associated with gender roles in family circles [5]. The girls in refugee camps are also vulnerable to sexual exploitation and trafficking [6].
Use and knowledge of SRH services and commodities, including family planning, are also often low among women and girls in humanitarian settings. One of the very few studies on this subject by McGinn et al. demonstrated that knowledge and use of modern contraceptive methods was low among married or in-union women of reproductive age in six reproductive health program locations (North Darfur, West Darfur, South Darfur, Southern Sudan, Northern Uganda and Eastern Congo) in three conflict-affected countries—Sudan, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo [7].
The access to SRH services is challenging for young women and girls living in refugee settlements or dispersed across host countries. The minimum health care package in humanitarian setting requires inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services [8]. A systematic review by Casey et al. established that implementation of SRH programs is possible in a humanitarian setting, however their utilization depends on their quality [9]. Furthermore, the review highlighted minimal provision of adolescent SRH services [9]. In 2004 a global evaluation of reproductive health services for refugees and IDPs concluded that most people affected by conflict lack adequate SRH care [10]. The evaluation found that contraceptive methods offered were frequently limited to pills and condoms. Long-acting contraceptives or permanent methods were rarely offered, and for all methods, supplies were often not reliable. The evaluation also pointed that adolescents were often underserved [10]. Since then, much progress has been made in the field of SRH in crisis settings in terms of policy, guidance and practice and steps have been taken toward integrating SRH into humanitarian response including increased program funding to implement SRH services [11]. Nevertheless, most conflict-affected girls and women still do not have adequate access to SRH services with family planning services often being particularly neglected. From 2012 to 2014, the Inter-agency Working Group (IAWG) undertook a second global evaluation of reproductive health in humanitarian settings. One of the series of reviews and articles concluded that although services are being provided, the availability of good quality SRH services was inconsistent across different settings. There was still a limited knowledge of available services and socio-cultural barriers to accessing them among communities [12].
Although, the research on the SRH of conflict- and disaster-affected populations is gaining attention globally, there is very scarce information on the needs and experiences of young refugees and IDPs in humanitarian settings, who are likely to be at particularly high risk of adverse SRH outcomes. Enhancing the weak evidence base on needs and experiences of crisis-affected girls and women will provide the tools for the research community and humanitarian actors to identify better ways to serve the SRH needs of these population groups. This systematic review aims at exploring and synthetizing the available evidence on sexual and reproductive health knowledge, experiences and access to services among refugee, migrant and displaced girls and young women in Africa.

2. Materials and Methods

A mixed methods systematic review, exploring qualitative and quantitative data, was conducted to assess our aim. Sandelowski et al. identified three general frameworks through which to conduct mixed methods systematic reviews—segregated, integrated, and contingent [13]. We have applied the integrated methodology for our review. In integrated designs, the methodological differences between qualitative and quantitative studies are minimized and the studies are grouped for synthesis by results addressing the same research questions, or describing the same aspects of a target phenomenon [13].

2.1. Search Strategy

We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews [14]. Two electronic databases—PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Search terms for sexual and reproductive health covered the topics relevant to conflict-affected situations, e.g., sexual violence, maternal health, as well as the topics of a particular relevance to young girls and women, e.g., sexuality education, teenage pregnancies, etc. Our choice was also guided by the SRH definitions from the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in 1994. Search terms are described in Table 1. Data search was performed between the end of March and the beginning of April 2018. In addition, we completed a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles. All records were exported into Mendeley—an online bibliographic management program produced by Elsevier. After we removed the duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion.

2.2. Study Selection

This review was limited to peer-reviewed, full-text articles published in English before March 2018. While we initially planned to search the grey literature, our time and financial resources did not permit us to explore this literature. Studies providing insufficient information, for example letters, abstracts or conference papers, were excluded. Study population of interest included refugee, migrant or displaced women and girls. For refugee, migrants and internally displaced populations (IDPs) we applied the official definitions of The United Nations (UN) and International Organization for Migration (IOM). Only studies which included results on adolescent and young women (10–24 years old) were considered. The UN define adolescents as individuals being 10–19 years old and youth as those persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years. We excluded studies which reported results on SRH of migrants and refugees without sex and age disaggregation. Only studies, which were conducted in African countries were included. Studies related to refugees of African origin settled in other region other than Africa were excluded. Details of the study selection are summarized in Figure 1.

2.3. Critical Appraisal

Two researchers independently reviewed the full texts for quality and suitability. Eligible papers then underwent a quality appraisal using the MMAT tool [15]. This tool was designed for systematic mixed studies reviews. The tool helps to examine the appropriateness of the study aim, adequacy and methodology, study design, data collection, study selection, data analysis, presentation of findings, author’s discussions and conclusions. For each of the included studies, the relevant four quality questions were asked corresponding to the study type, e.g., qualitative, quantitative descriptive or mixed methods. The studies were scored using percentages (0–100%). Any discrepancies were discussed until a consensus was reached.

2.4. Data Extraction and Analysis

Two authors independently read all included articles and completed a data extraction form created to gather the following: authors, study setting, main study objectives, study population, study design and study findings. Due to the inclusion of studies using qualitative and quantitative design, conducting a meta-analysis of the data was not appropriate. A descriptive narrative synthesis was chosen as the most relevant and suitable method of data synthesis for this review. The results are supported with original quotations and examples.

3. Results

3.1. Study Characteristics

From 960 records, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. They were conducted in nine African countries which included Uganda, Ethiopia, DR Congo, Somalia, Kenya, Nigeria, Djibouti, Rwanda and Sierra Leone [6,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These consisted of eight applied qualitative, five quantitative and two mixed-method study designs. Three studies were performed exclusively with young girls and women of age groups 10–24, 12 other studies included them as one of the groups in total population, e.g., among women of reproductive age or adolescents including boys and girls. One study [16] reported the results before and after the intervention. For the purpose of this review we have used the baseline data from the above mentioned study on HIV/STDs knowledge and attitudes among young displaced girls. In the case of the study performed by Stark et al. [26] we only used the qualitative data for this review because the quantitative data were previously reported within a bigger sample in Stark et al. [25]. Tanabe et al. [28] focused on refugee adolescent girls living with disabilities. Four studies also included data collected in Asian or Middle East countries apart of African countries [27,28,29]. Further details on the methodology and the main objectives of the included studies are presented in Table 2.

3.2. Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge

Six articles reported on knowledge and misconceptions regarding contraception, HIV/AIDS and STIs [16,18,19,21,27,28]. Overall, the knowledge of refugee and displaced young women and girls on the full range of contraceptive methods were limited. Also, the adolescents were less aware about modern methods of contraception than the adults in the same setting [27]. Nevertheless, the young participants could name at least one method of contraception [21,28]. Two studies demonstrated that the misinformation about contraceptive methods is widespread preventing young women and girls from using them [18,21]. Knowledge of routes of HIV transmission and HIV prevention were also limited [16,19]. Casey et al. [16] demonstrated that 25% of female youth did not know any correct route of HIV transmission, while 28.7% did not know any effective means of avoiding HIV. Harrison et al. [19] showed that comprehensive correct knowledge of HIV/AIDS among refugee females in Uganda aged 15–24 was 33.5%. Casey et al. [16] also found low knowledge among female youth in Sierra Leone regarding STIs —33.2% of participants did not know any signs of STIs.

3.3. Sexual and Reproductive Health Experiences and Practices

All studies shared findings on the experiences and practices of female youth including contraceptive use, gender-based and sexual violence, child marriages, transactional sex, puberty changes and decision-making. Half of the studies reported on the prevalence of and fears related to gender-based or sexual violence and abuse in humanitarian settings [6,17,22,23,25,26,29]. In the study of Feseha et al. [17] the magnitude of partner’s physical violence in the last 12 months in the Schimelba refugee camp in northern Ethiopia among girls aged 15–19 was 10% and 41% among girls 20–24 years old. High prevalence of violence (51.6%) among conflict-affected girls 13–19 years old was also reported in DRC and Ethiopia by Stark et al. [25]. The qualitative study from Iyakaremye and Mukagatare [6] performed with adolescents in Kigeme refugee camp in Rwanda found that rape, unwanted physical touching, sexual exploitation, commercial sex, early marriage and trafficking were the main forms of sexual abuse. Forced sex and rape among young women were also reported in the qualitative study of Whelan et al. [29]. Sexual violence was also mentioned by the majority of girls in Ethiopia and DRC and was considered to be the most serious type of violence affecting the community: “sometimes there are drunk men who rape girls along the road” (age 15, Ethiopia) [26]. This sexual abuse leaves girls with consequences such as unwanted pregnancies leading to unsafe abortions, rejection and harassment in their families [6]. The topic of child/early marriages was raised in qualitative studies and it was seen as an important concern among young adolescents [6,22]. It was perceived as a barrier to pursue education and often resulted in early pregnancies: “(for) the ladies, it’s possible that they may not continue with the education and they may end up in early marriage” (girls, 13–14 years old). [22].
Transactional and commercial sex, so called “survival sex” in exchange for goods, food, menstrual hygiene products and money was highlighted in some studies [6,19,21,23,29]. “Many girls in this camp sleep with men in order to survive. We are here in Nigeria with nothing and nobody to help us and we have to survive” (18 year old young women) [21]. Harrison et al. [19] found that 66.7% of sexually active females aged 15-24 had a transactional partner in the past 12 months. At the same time only 16.7% of them used a condom during the last sexual encounter. The low condom use was also documented in three other studies [16,21,27]. This also applies to other contraceptive methods. The main reasons identified for non-use were partner refusal, misinformation, religion, fear of side effects and stigma. One girl from the Oru refugee camp in Nigeria commented: “I like using condom during sex but I didn’t use it the last time I had sex because I didn’t want to buy it in the camp. I don’t want anyone to think I’m a prostitute. I remember the last time I went to buy condom and pills in a chemist in the camp; I was embarrassed by some women. They asked me what a young girl like me wanted to do with condom and pills. I was so ashamed that I had to lie that someone sent me. So, I prefer buying it outside the camp, a little bit far away, where no one knows me.” [21]. Only one study explored body/puberty changes in refugee adolescent girls which is an important aspect of adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health [20].

3.4. Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services, Commodities and Information

Several studies addressed the access to SRH services and information [18,20,21,22,23,27,28,29]. Girls and young women stated parents (mostly mothers), siblings and peers as main sources of SRH information on pregnancy, puberty, menstruation, etc. [20,22,23]. Lack of information regarding different areas of SRH was documented in the above studies. For example, the majority of Somali girls (95.2%) indicated having learned about body changes before they occurred, however 66.8% would like to have had more information and very few girls of age 10-14 reported learning about pregnancy (18.2%) [20]. Patel et al. [23] in a qualitative inquiry found that many participants reported access to information on HIV/AIDS and very few (6%) had access to information on contraception, sexuality, abortion and pregnancy. The same study showed that girls younger 18 years old face problems to access information about family planning: “When they (family planning services) are teaching about condoms, they usually restrict it to people of 18 years and above. They are the ones who are advised to use it. The use of family planning is for married women (those with husbands) not for girls. . . young girls in the ages of 12–14 years don’t have any knowledge about condoms.” (adolescent girl) [23].
Adolescent girls also lacked access to SRH commodities including menstrual hygiene products and contraception. Only 61.5% of Somali girls in Kobe refugee camp stated having sufficient access to soap and water, but less than one girl in five (19.2%) had access to cloth/pads to use during menstruation [20]. Three studies documented a limited access to contraceptive methods including condoms [21,23,27]. A high proportion (60 to 91%) of adolescent girls found it difficult to obtain contraceptives in the camps [21,23]. The main barriers were distance to the health care facilities, costs, lack of knowledge about sources of contraception, stigma and judgmental attitudes. For example, adolescent girls in Nakivale camp, Uganda reported that they often find the condom dispensers in the settlement empty [27]. Costs and distance to the health care services were highlighted in the study of Okanlawon et al. [21]: “Before, contraceptives like pills, IUD, injectables, etc., were free in this camp, but since the camp clinic was closed in 2007, we now go to hospitals in the surrounding community to receive the service. It’s no longer free. Some of us like to use it, but we can’t get it in the camp. That’s the problem.” (24 years old young women).
The last point we would like to highlight is the quality of provided SRH services. Refugee women and girls complained about lack of facilities for STI testing, lack of acceptable and affordable contraceptives, stock outs, long waiting times, language barriers and discrimination [21,27,28,29].

3.5. Criticial Appraisal of Included Studies

The majority of studies (10 of 15) scored 75% and more, five other studies scored 50% and no study was assigned less than 50% (Table 2). Overall, we could conclude that the quality of included articles was from moderate to high.

4. Discussion

The aim of this review was to combine the existing evidence on SRH knowledge, experiences and access to services of young women and girls aged 10–24 in crisis and humanitarian situations. Such studies were largely absent and thus this review pointed out the lack of available peer-reviewed literature on SRH of girls and young women in the African region, where multiple conflicts are ongoing for decades, putting their health, including SRH at risk. To summarize, the young women and girls are lacking knowledge on SRH issues; access to this information is often hindered because of many different factors including stigma related to young age; access to SRH services and commodities is challenging because of distance, costs and quality.
The studies in this review show us the limited SRH knowledge and awareness among adolescent girls and the misconceptions about the contraceptives which cause the adolescents to refrain from using them. As a result, insufficient uptake of family planning contributes to morbidity and mortality in women and girls of reproductive age via pregnancy-related complications and deaths [30]. The studies have also explored the access to and sources of SRH knowledge and education in humanitarian settings but the sources preferred by the adolescent for obtaining SRH information has not been very well documented. An effective way of educating the adolescents about SRH would be through the sources they prefer.
The studies show high prevalence of sexual violence, coerced sex, transactional sex and other forms of sexual exploitations. In a few studies, this sexual harassment or physical violence may be instigated by own family members or partner [17,25]. Sexual exploitation by family members or close relatives may be quite difficult to assess as the adolescents may not be willing to open up to report such incidences. However, we believe that quite a large number of girls are suffering from sexual exploitations and harassments by their family members and close relatives apart from their partners. This finding has been reported previously in other studies in Africa in non-humanitarian settings [31]. These cases of sexual exploitations also need to be extensively studied.
In addition, we would like to discuss the main points which could help to strengthen future data collection in this field. Firstly, although many identified studies report on SRH of refuges and migrants, few of them disaggregate findings by age and sex of respondents. During the full text review and data extraction process we faced challenges to separate results for youth and for female participants, excluding several studies from this review. Some of the included studies also stressed the necessity to perform target research in this age group [20]. A number of studies have been performed on SRH of women of reproductive age. The results which are not segregated by age, may confuse the current situation and needs of the adolescents with those of the women of higher reproductive age.
Secondly, multi-setting studies provide reach and comparable information across different humanitarian settings. However, here the disaggregation of results by setting plays an important role as the findings of one humanitarian settings cannot be generalized onto the other due to the differences between the settings. The differences may exist due to cultural values and background of the refugees and the infrastructural and economic differences of the hosts.


This systematic review has a number of limitations. Only studies written in English were included. The MMAT appraisal tool for mixed-method research was used to assess the quality of reporting in the studies, but more specialized quality assessment tools such as the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias would have provided more in-depth reviews of quality. Unfortunately due to time constraints and funding, this review did not include grey literature, such as UNFPA and UNHCR reports and studies conducted by non-governmental organizations working in humanitarian settings. These studies could have provided valuable data on SRH indicators and situation of girls and women affected by conflicts and disasters. Although PubMed and Web of Science are the most often used search databases, we might have missed some relevant studies included to other databases, e.g., Global Health or EMBASE. Some of the peer-reviewed studies which could not be accessed, were also not included.

5. Conclusions

Results of this review demonstrate the gaps in the existed evidence on SRH of migrant, refugee and displaced girls and women living in Africa. The necessity of disaggregation by sex and age should be addressed in future research. Targeting young refugee, displaced and migrant adolescents of 10–14 years old is very important enabling the complexity of body and physiological changes and the paucity of information from this age and population group to be taken into account.

Author Contributions

O.I. designed the review, led the searching, screening, and analysis of records and drafted the article. M.R. performed a literature search, quality assessment of the publications and contributed to the article writing process. E.K. provided conceptual insight and feedback on revisions. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.


This review was funded by the Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung, Medical Faculty of Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Germany.


We would like to thank our colleagues—Andrea Rachow, Kathrin Held, Lisa Rogers and Michael Hoelscher for their support and guidance during the funding acquisition stage and review process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


AIDSAcquired immune deficiency syndrome
HIVHuman immunodeficiency virus
IAWGInter-agency Working Group (IAWG)
IDPInternally displaced people
FGDFocus group discussion
MMATMixed Methods Appraisal Tool
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
SRHSexual and reproductive health
STISexually transmitted infection
UNFPAUnited Nations Population Fund
UNHCRThe United Nations Refugee Agency


  1. UNFPA; Save the Children USA. A Companion to the Inter-Agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings: A Companion to the Inter-Agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian, 1st ed.; UNFPA: New York, NY, USA; Save the Children USA: Fairfield, CT, USA, 2009; pp. 1–92. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ward, J.; Marsh, M. Sexual Violence against Women and Girls in War and Its Aftermath: Realities, Responses, and Required Resources. Available online: (accessed on 15 May 2018).
  3. Jamieson, D.J.; Meikle, S.F.; Hillis, S.D.; Mtsuko, D.; Mawji, S.; Duerr, A. An evaluation of poor pregnancy outcomes among Burundian refugees in Tanzania. JAMA 2000, 3, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bartlett, L.A.; Jamieson, D.J.; Kahn, T.; Sultana, M.; Wilson, H.G.; Duerr, A. Maternal mortality among Afghan refugees in Pakistan, 1999–2000. Lancet 2002, 359, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. UNFPA. Adolescent Girls in Disaster & Conflict: Interventions for Improving Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services, 1st ed.; UNFPA: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yakaremye, I.; Mukagatare, C. Forced migration and sexual abuse: Experience of congolese adolescent girls in Kigeme refugee camp, Rwanda. Health Psychol. Rep. 2016, 4, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McGinn, T.; Austin, J.; Anfinson, K.; Amsalu, R.; Casey, S.E.; Fadulalmula, S.I.; Langston, A.; Lee-Jones, L.; Meyers, J.; Mubiru, F.K.; et al. Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries. Confl. Health 2011, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. UNFPA. Inter-Agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings: 2010 Revision for Field Review, 1st ed.; Inter-Agency Working Group (IAWG) on Reproductive Health in Crises: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 1–217. [Google Scholar]
  9. Casey, S.E. Evaluations of reproductive health programs in humanitarian settings: A systematic review. Confl. Health 2015, 9, S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. UNHCR. Inter-Agency Global Evaluation of Reproductive Health Services for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons. 2004. Available online: (accessed on 15 May 2018).
  11. Chynoweth, S.K. Advancing reproductive health on the humanitarian agenda: The 2012–2014 global review. Confl. Health. 2015, 9, I1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Casey, S.E.; Chynoweth, S.K.; Cornier, N.; Gallagher, M.C.; Wheeler, E.E. Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: Mixed-methods case studies. Confl. Health 2015, 9, S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sandelowski, M.; Voils, C.I.; Barroso, J. Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Res. Sch. 2006, 13, 29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pace, R.; Pluye, P.; Bartlett, G.; Macaulay, A.C.; Salsberg, J.; Jagosh, J.; Seller, R. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2012, 49, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Casey, S.E.; Larsen, M.M.; McGinn, T.; Sartie, M.; Dauda, M.; Lahai, P. Changes in HIV/AIDS/STI knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among the youth in Port Loko, Sierra Leone. Glob. Public Health 2006, 1, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Feseha, G.; Gerbaba, M. Intimate partner physical violence among women in Shimelba refugee camp, northern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gure, F.; Yusuf, M.; Foster, A.M. Exploring Somali women’s reproductive health knowledge and experiences: Results from focus group discussions in Mogadishu. Reprod. Health Matters 2015, 23, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Harrison, K.M.; Claass, J.; Spiegel, P.B.; Bamuturaki, J.; Patterson, N.; Muyonga, M.; Tatwebwa, L. HIV behavioural surveillance among refugees and surrounding host communities in Uganda, 2006. Afr. J. AIDS Res. 2009, 8, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kågesten, A.E.; Zimmerman, L.; Robinson, C.; Lee, C.; Bawoke, T.; Osman, S.; Schlecht, J. Transitions into puberty and access to sexual and reproductive health information in two humanitarian settings: A cross-sectional survey of very young adolescents from Somalia and Myanmar. Confl. Health 2017, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Okanlawon, K.; Reeves, M.; Agbaje, O.F. Contraceptive use: Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of refugee youths in Oru Refugee Camp, Nigeria. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 2010, 14, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Ortiz-Echevarria, L.; Greeley, M.; Bawoke, T.; Zimmerman, L.; Robinson, C.; Schlecht, J. Understanding the unique experiences, perspectives and sexual and reproductive health needs of very young adolescents: Somali refugees in Ethiopia. Confl. Health 2017, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Patel, S.H.; Muyinda, H.; Sewankambo, N.K.; Oyat, G.; Atim, S.; Spittal, P.M. In the face of war: Examining sexual vulnerabilities of Acholi adolescent girls living in displacement camps in conflict-affected Northern Uganda. BMC Int. Health Hum. Rights 2012, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schlecht, J.; Rowley, E.; Babirye, J.; Schlecht, J.; Rowley, E. Early relationships and marriage in conflict and post-conflict settings: Vulnerability of youth in Uganda. RHM. Reprod. Health Matters 2013, 21, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stark, L.; Asghar, K.; Yu, G.; Bora, C.; Baysa, A.A.; Falb, K.L. Prevalence and associated risk factors of violence against conflict-affected female adolescents: A multi-country, cross-sectional study. J. Glob. Health 2017, 7, 10416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stark, L.; Sommer, M.; Davis, K.; Asghar, K.; Baysa, A.A.; Abdela, G.; Tanner, S.; Falb, K. Disclosure bias for group versus individual reporting of violence amongst conflict-affected adolescent girls in DRC and Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tanabe, M.; Myers, A.; Bhandari, P.; Cornier, N.; Doraiswamy, S.; Krause, S. Family planning in refugee settings: Findings and actions from a multi-country study. Confl. Health 2017, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanabe, M.; Nagujjah, Y.; Rimal, N.; Bukania, F.; Krause, S. Intersecting sexual and reproductive health and disability in humanitarian settings: Risks, needs, and capacities of refugees with disabilities in Kenya, Nepal, and Uganda. Sex. Disabil. 2015, 33, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Whelan, A.; Blogg, J. ‘Halfway people’: Refugee views of reproductive health services. Glob. Public Health 2007, 2, 373–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ackerson, K.; Zielinski, R. Factors influencing use of family planning in women living in crisis affected areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of the literature. Midwifery 2017, 54, 35–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lalor, K. Child Sexual Abuse in Sub-Saharan Africa: Child Protection Implications for Development Policy Makers and Practitioners. 2005. Available online: (accessed on 1 June 2018).
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram.
Ijerph 15 01583 g001
Table 1. Search terms used in PubMed and Web of Science.
Table 1. Search terms used in PubMed and Web of Science.
CategorySearch Terms Combined with AND
Age Groupyouth OR teenager OR teen OR girl OR young female OR adolescent OR woman OR young woman OR women OR young person OR adolescence OR female OR reproductive age
Age10 to 24
Statusrefugee OR migrant OR displaced OR displaced person OR foreigner OR immigrant OR ethnic minority OR indigenous OR internally displaced OR asylum
SRH topicssexual OR sexual health OR reproductive health OR early marriage OR child marriage OR female genital mutilation OR cutting OR female circumcision OR circumcised OR sexual behavior OR sexual experience OR sexual activity OR early sexual debut OR sexual initiation OR menstruation OR menstrual hygiene OR contraception OR family planning OR pregnancy OR antenatal OR birth OR post-natal OR sexually transmitted infection OR STI OR sexual intercourse OR HIV OR violence OR sexuality education OR reproduction OR sexual well-being OR condom OR human immunodeficiency virus OR AIDS OR sex education OR sex OR relationship OR physical relationship OR sexual coercion OR rape OR sexual violence OR sexual abuse OR abortion OR maternal health OR fistula OR motherhood OR gender OR forced sex OR intimate partner violence OR gender based violence OR transactional sex OR sex work OR HPV OR cervical cancer
Outcomeneed OR unmet need OR access OR knowledge OR availability OR experience OR awareness OR perception
Countries/regionsAfrica OR Algeria OR Angola OR Benin OR Botswana OR Burkina Faso OR Burundi OR Cameroon OR Cape Verde OR Central African Republic OR Chad OR Comoros OR Congo OR Democratic Republic of the Congo OR Cote d'Ivoire OR Djibouti OR Egypt OR Equatorial Guinea OR Eritrea OR Ethiopia OR Gabon OR Gambia OR Ghana OR Guinea OR Guinea-Bissau OR Kenya OR Lesotho OR Liberia OR Libya OR Madagascar OR Malawi OR Mali OR Mauritania OR Mauritius OR Morocco OR Mozambique OR Namibia OR Niger OR Nigeria OR Rwanda OR Sao Tome OR Senegal OR Seychelles OR Sierra Leone OR Somalia OR South Africa OR Sudan OR South Sudan OR Swaziland OR Tanzania OR Togo OR Tunisia OR Uganda OR Zambia OR Zimbabwe, NOT (Europe OR EU OR European Union OR Australia OR US OR New Zeeland OR United States OR France OR Greece OR Italy OR Austria OR Belgium OR Latvia OR Bulgaria OR Lithuania OR Croatia OR Luxembourg OR Cyprus OR Malta OR Czech Republic OR Netherlands OR Denmark OR Poland OR Estonia OR Portugal OR Finland OR Romania OR France OR Slovakia OR Germany OR Slovenia OR Greece OR Spain OR Hungary OR Sweden OR Ireland OR United Kingdom OR UK OR America OR Asia OR Brazil OR South America OR Latin America)
Table 2. Characteristics of studies included in the review.
Table 2. Characteristics of studies included in the review.
NAuthorYearCountryPopulationAge Group Included in the ReviewDesignMain ResearchObjective/AimQuality of Studies (MMAT)
1Casey et al. [16]2006Sierra LeoneYouth displaced by conflict (244 female and 293 male participants)15–24Quantitative
Survey (baseline data)
Explore the HIV/AIDS/STD knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of youth50%
2Feseha et al. [17]2012EthiopiaRefugee women (422) including 40 girls of 15–19 years old and 156 of 20–24 years old15–24Quantitative
Assess the magnitude of intimate partner physical violence and associated factors among women100%
3Gure et al. [18]2015SomaliaUnmarried girls in displacement camps (5) among total sample of 21 married and unmarried women18–20Qualitative
Explore women’s knowledge of, experiences with, and need for reproductive health services50%
4Harrison et al. [19]2009UgandaRefugees and host communities (1600) with 120 (19.8%) of total female refugees (607) being girls of age 15–19 and 100 (16.6%) of 20–24 years old15–24Quantitative
Standardized behavioral surveillance survey (BSS)
Provide data on HIIV related knowledge, attitudes and behavior among refugees and surrounding hosts populations to allow for targeted HIV interventions100%
5Iyakaremye and Mukagatare [6]2016RwandaAdolescent girls from DRC(10) in total sample (17) of boys, mothers, fathers and staffAdolescent girls age not mentionedQualitative
Interviews and FGDs
Explore the experience of sexual abuse of adolescent girls in refugee camp75%
6Kågesten et al. [20]2017Ethiopia and ThailandYoung Somali adolescents (406) in Kobe refugee camp, from which 214 (52.7%) were girls; and young adolescents from Myanmar (399)10–14Quantitative
Household survey
Describe transition into puberty and access to SRH information among very young adolescents in humanitarian setting75%
7Okanlawon et al. [21]2010NigeriaYouth in Oru refugee camp (116 female of total 208)10–24Qualitative and Quantitative
Self-administered questionnaire, in depth interviews and FGDs
Examine the perceptions, beliefs, knowledge and attitudes of refugee youths towards contraceptive use and also the access to and use of contraceptives in this refugee campQualitative—75%
8Ortiz-Echevarria et al. [22]2017EthiopiaSomali refugees and host community (126–32 adults and 94 adolescents including 46 refugee girls)10–16Qualitative
FGD with community mapping and photo
Understand lived realities of very young adolescents in Kobe refugee camp, their health and development needs, expectations and goals75%
9Patel et al. [23]2012UgandaAcholi girls (67) and adult women (65) in three displacement camps in Gulu district14–19Qualitative
In-depth interviews and FGD
Provide a better understanding of adolescent girl’s enhanced risk for HIV infection in conflict settings and to inform the development of appropriate sexual education and HIV prevention initiatives in this population group100%
10Schlecht et al. [24]2013UgandaDisplaced and refugee men and women from Uganda and DRC (133)10–24Qualitative
Cross sectional
FGDKey informant interviews
Describe the factors which contribute to early relationships and informal marriages in conflict and post-conflict settings75%
11Stark et al. [25]2017DRC and EthiopiaDisplaced, conflict-affected adolescent girls (1296)13–19Quantitative
Survey questionnaire using computer-assisted personal interview and computer-assisted self-interview
Assess the prevalence and related risk factors of physical, emotional, and sexual violence100%
12Stark et al. [26]2017DRC and Ethiopia87 internally displaced adolescent girls from DRC and 78 Sudanese girls in Ethiopian refugee camps10–19Qualitative
Qualitative participatory mapping activity
Provide insight into assessing gender based violence from two methodological approaches75%
13Tanabe et al. [28]2015Kenya, Nepal and Uganda352 refugee female and male participants from them44 adolescent girls with any type of impairment in Kenya and Uganda15–19Qualitative
Individual interviews and FGDs
Explore the specific risks, needs and barriers for persons with disabilities to access SRH services, and the capacities and practical ways through which the challenges could be addressed75%
14Tanabe et al. [27]2017Djibouti, Kenya, Uganda, Bangladesh, Jordan and MalaysiaAdolescents, women and men in refugee settings15–19Qualitative and Quantitative
Household survey, in-depth interviews, FGDs and facilities assessment
Document the knowledge of family planning, belief and practices of refugees, and the state of service provisionQualitative—50%
15Whelan [29]2007Uganda, Yemen and DRCRefugees (816) including sample of 78 girls from Uganda and DRC participating in FGDsAdolescent girls age not mentionedQualitative
FGDs and interviews
Identify factors that facilitate or hinder access to, use of, and satisfaction with RH services in refugee settings50%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ivanova, O.; Rai, M.; Kemigisha, E. A Systematic Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge, Experiences and Access to Services among Refugee, Migrant and Displaced Girls and Young Women in Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1583.

AMA Style

Ivanova O, Rai M, Kemigisha E. A Systematic Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge, Experiences and Access to Services among Refugee, Migrant and Displaced Girls and Young Women in Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(8):1583.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ivanova, Olena, Masna Rai, and Elizabeth Kemigisha. 2018. "A Systematic Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge, Experiences and Access to Services among Refugee, Migrant and Displaced Girls and Young Women in Africa" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 8: 1583.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop