Next Article in Journal
The Mediating Roles of Happiness and Cohesion in the Relationship between Employee Volunteerism and Job Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
When Less is More: Vaping Low-Nicotine vs. High-Nicotine E-Liquid is Compensated by Increased Wattage and Higher Liquid Consumption
Previous Article in Journal
Unmet Needs and Use of Assistive Products in Two Districts of Bangladesh: Findings from a Household Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tobacco Health Risk Awareness among Socially Disadvantaged People—A Crucial Tool for Smoking Cessation
Article

IQOSTM vs. e-Cigarette vs. Tobacco Cigarette: A Direct Comparison of Short-Term Effects after Overnight-Abstinence

1
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven—University Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2
Applied Psychology Unit, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Molenstraat 8, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(12), 2902; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122902
Received: 13 November 2018 / Revised: 14 December 2018 / Accepted: 14 December 2018 / Published: 18 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smoking Cessation)
Introduction: Research from Philip Morris International’s science division on its Heat-not-Burn product IQOSTM focused on its chemical, toxicological, clinical, and behavioral aspects. Independent research on the experiences and behavioral aspects of using IQOSTM, and how it compares to e-cigarettes, is largely lacking. The current randomized, cross-over behavioral trial tried to bridge the latter gaps. Methods: Participants (n = 30) came to the lab on three consecutive days after being overnight smoking abstinent. During each session, participants used one of three products (cigarette, e-cigarette, or IQOSTM) for five minutes. Exhaled CO (eCO) measurements and questionnaires were repeatedly administered throughout the session. Results: Smoking a cigarette for five minutes resulted in a significant increase of eCO, whereas using an IQOSTM resulted in a small but reliable increase (0.3 ppm). Vaping did not affect eCO. Cigarette craving reduced significantly after product use, with the decline being stronger for smoking than for e-cigarettes or IQOSTM. Withdrawal symptoms declined immediately after smoking or using IQOSTM, and with some delay after vaping. IQOSTM scored higher in terms of subjective reward/satisfaction and was slightly preferred to the e-cigarette. Discussion: Short-term use of IQOSTM has a minimal impact on eCO, is equally effective in reducing cigarette craving and withdrawal symptoms as an e-cigarette, and is slightly preferred. View Full-Text
Keywords: tobacco harm reduction; electronic cigarettes; heat-not-burn tobacco products tobacco harm reduction; electronic cigarettes; heat-not-burn tobacco products
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Adriaens, K.; Van Gucht, D.; Baeyens, F. IQOSTM vs. e-Cigarette vs. Tobacco Cigarette: A Direct Comparison of Short-Term Effects after Overnight-Abstinence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122902

AMA Style

Adriaens K, Van Gucht D, Baeyens F. IQOSTM vs. e-Cigarette vs. Tobacco Cigarette: A Direct Comparison of Short-Term Effects after Overnight-Abstinence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(12):2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adriaens, Karolien, Dinska Van Gucht, and Frank Baeyens. 2018. "IQOSTM vs. e-Cigarette vs. Tobacco Cigarette: A Direct Comparison of Short-Term Effects after Overnight-Abstinence" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 12: 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122902

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop