Next Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Secondary Metabolites from Penicillium sp. NX-S-6
Next Article in Special Issue
Discovery of Secondary Metabolites from the Sponge-Derived Fungus Aspergillus templicola
Previous Article in Journal
Macroalgae-Inspired Brominated Chalcones as Cosmetic Ingredients with the Potential to Target Skin Inflammaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural and Functional Insights into a Novel Aspergillus ochraceus Polysaccharide from the Weddell Sea: Implications for Melanoma Immunotherapy In Vitro
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insights into Natural Products from Marine-Derived Fungi with Antimycobacterial Properties: Opportunities and Challenges

1
School of Pharmacy, Bandung Institute of Technology, Jl. Ganesha No. 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
2
Laboratory of Natural Products for Drug Discovery, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, 1-6 Yamadaoka, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(7), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070279
Submission received: 12 June 2025 / Revised: 28 June 2025 / Accepted: 29 June 2025 / Published: 3 July 2025

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) poses a persistent global health threat exacerbated by the emergence of drug-resistant strains; hence, there is a continuous quest for novel antimicrobial agents. Despite efforts to develop effective therapies, existing treatments require a relatively long duration of therapy to eradicate the pathogen due to its virulence factors, pathogenesis patterns, and ability to enter dormant states. This can lead to a higher risk of treatment failure due to poor patient adherence to the complex regimen. As a result, considerable research is necessary to identify alternative antituberculosis agents. The marine environment, particularly marine-derived fungi, has recently gained interest due to its potential as an abundant source of bioactive natural products. This review covers 19 genera of marine-derived fungi and 139 metabolites, 131 of which exhibit antimycobacterial activity. The integrated dataset pinpoints the fungal genera and chemical classes that most frequently yield potent antimycobacterial hits while simultaneously exposing critical gaps, such as the minimal evaluation of compounds against dormant bacilli and the presence of underexplored ecological niches and fungal genera. Several compounds exhibit potent activity through uncommon mechanisms, including the inhibition of mycobacterial protein tyrosine phosphatases (MptpB/MptpA), protein kinase PknG, ATP synthase and the disruption of mycobacterial DNA via G-quadruplex stabilization. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) trends are highlighted for the most potent agents, illuminating how specific functional groups underpin target engagement and potency. This review also briefly proposes a dereplication strategy and approaches for toxicity mitigation in the exploration of marine-derived fungi’s natural products. Through this analysis, we offer insights into the potency and challenges of marine-derived fungi’s natural products as hit compounds or scaffolds for further antimycobacterial research.

1. Introduction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis, was first reported on in March 1882 by Robert Koch, though the history of tuberculosis began thousands of years ago [1]. The WHO Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 revealed 10.6 million cases, with Southeast Asia being the highest contributing number, followed by Africa and the Western Pacific, indicating that most patients were found in developing countries [2]. Factors such as poverty, limited access to healthcare, HIV co-infection, malnutrition, and overcrowded living conditions are thought to underlie these high case numbers. Tuberculosis spreads easily via droplets, so such conditions greatly increase the possibility of local epidemics [3]. Additionally, M. tuberculosis’s virulence factors, unique pathogenesis, and capacity to enter a non-replicating (dormant) state are major reasons for the disease’s persistence and the complexity of its therapy, despite the availability of current medications and nationwide prevention strategies [4,5,6]. This phenomenon urges the need to find alternatives with a better mode of action to shorten the duration of therapy and simplify the therapy regimen. Also, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant M. tuberculosis strains makes the search for alternative antituberculosis agents more imperative than ever.
Marine organism diversity offers rich opportunities to explore novel and medically promising NPs. Although only a tiny fraction of active MF NPs have been identified, they show higher successful application rates than other natural resources, indicating underexplored yet valuable assets [7]. Among various microorganisms that reside independently or in association with other organisms (such as sponges and coral reefs), fungi occupy most of the marine environment. In 2019, marine-derived fungi (MF) NPs accounted for almost 47% of the total marine-derived NPs reported, indicating that MF could be a promising source for NP research, with diverse biological activities encompassing antifungal, antibacterial, cytotoxic, and other biological activities [8]. This suggests that continuing the study of MF is essential to discover new and potentially beneficial bioactive compounds that can help tackle various global challenges, including infectious diseases.
Marine-derived fungi represent a promising source of antimycobacterial activity because they can be cultivated and, in many cases, genetically manipulated to support gram-to-kilogram-scale metabolite production. This review collates and summarizes secondary metabolites with confirmed antimycobacterial activity that have been isolated from marine fungi recovered from diverse habitats, including coastal sediments, mangroves, sponges, and deep-sea environments. Relevant primary papers were retrieved by prioritizing original reports reporting minimum inhibitory (MIC) or half-maximal inhibitory (IC50) concentrations against Mycobacterium or validated mycobacterial enzyme targets, with the objective of identifying compounds that warrant further evaluation as lead compounds for alternative antituberculosis development. In this article, we present extensive coverage over the period of 2002–2023, with 131 out of 139 MF NPs exhibiting antimycobacterial properties reported from various MF genera. The compounds are presented in groups based on the common chemical structures, namely, polyketides, peptides, alkaloids, terpenoids, and steroids. We also highlight the novelty of the MF NPs at the time of their being reported as having antimycobacterial properties. The mechanisms of action of some compounds are discussed and the structure–activity relationships of the most potent compounds are also briefly outlined.

2. Antimycobacterial Compounds from Marine-Derived Fungi

2.1. Marine-Derived Fungi and Their Marine Sources

The antimycobacterial MF discussed in this review consist of polyketides (57.58%), alkaloids and peptides (25.76%), terpenoids and steroids (13.64%), and miscellaneous compounds (3.03%) (Figure 1). Polyketides are some of the most varied metabolites, with distinct bioactivities identified in the fungi, which are known to house an immense number of biosynthetic gene clusters coding for numerous secondary metabolites, including polyketide synthase [9,10].
Those antimycobacterials originate from 19 genera, including Alternaria, Arthrinium, Ascochyta, Aspergillus, Coniothyrium, Diaporthe, Fusarium, Gliomastix, Metarhizium, Nigrospora, Penicillium, Phoma, Pleosporales, Sporendonema, Talaromyces, Tolypocladium, Trichoderma, Zopfiella, and Xylaria, which were isolated from various marine sources such as marine sediment, mangrove, sponge, alga, coral, sea fan, anemone, and ascidian (Figure 2).

2.2. Novel Antimycobacterials from Marine-Derived Fungi

Between 2002 and 2023, roughly half of all marine-fungal antimycobacterial compounds reported each year were new (novel) structures (Figure 3). The majority of these novel compounds were found in 2019, which had the highest number of marine-fungal antimycobacterial compounds reported in a single year. Novel compounds were found more dominantly in the alkaloid and peptide groups compared to other compound types (Figure 4). Polyketides, being the largest group of MF antimycobacterials, are composed of more known compounds than novel ones (Figure 3). This is partly due to polyketides being one of the most abundant metabolites in fungi, leading to their more frequent discovery compared to other compound groups [11].

2.3. Antimycobacterial Assay

We found that a total of 131 MF metabolites (out of 139) exhibited antimycobacterial activity, ranging from strong to weak activity (in the sections below, compounds with strong activity will be discussed in more detail; weak compounds will be described more briefly). The compounds were investigated against various Mycobacterium strains, such as M. tuberculosis, M. smegmatis, M. bovis BCG, M. phlei, and M. marinum. Another method that is commonly used to investigate antitubercular activity is the mycobacterial enzyme inhibitor assay. Here, we plot the activity against the Mycobacterium strain or specific enzyme (Figure 5).
Our review showed that 39.4% of compounds were tested only against non-M. tuberculosis species. Of those tests, M. phlei was the most common surrogate (accounting for 43.9% of the non-M.tb assays), followed by M. smegmatis (28.8%), M. bovis BCG (22.7%), and M. marinum (4.5%). In comparison, 26.3% of the compounds were tested against M. tuberculosis itself, and 25.0% were evaluated in enzymatic assays (e.g., against MptpB, MptpA, or PknG). A smaller fraction of compounds was tested in multiple model types: 7.6% against both M. tuberculosis and a surrogate species, 0.76% against both M. tuberculosis and a mycobacterial enzyme, and 0.76% against both a surrogate species and an enzyme. This suggests that surrogate models are highly valued as front-line, high-throughput surrogates that combine speed, safety, and cost-efficiency.

2.4. Antimycobacterials Against Dormant Phenotypes

Tuberculosis infection is known to be highly influenced by the host’s immune status, indicating that the outcome post-invasion may differ from one individual to another. In immunocompetent individuals, infection can remain latent or become active, whereas immunocompromised hosts (e.g., HIV-positive patients) will most likely develop active disease [12,13]. Latent infection occurs when the host’s immune system contains the growth of the bacilli, preventing them from proliferating or causing tissue damage. This dormant (non-replicating) state is also thought to contribute to the need for prolonged therapy. Longer treatment duration, in turn, increase the risk of failure due to patient non-compliance, which can be triggered by severe and intolerable side effects of the drugs, the high cost of treatment, and the extended period during which patients remain contagious [12,14]. Vilcheze and co-workers suggested that most of the available antituberculosis therapies were only effective against metabolically active Mycobacterium and did not display the same potency against metabolically inactive clusters [15]. Hence, one of the solutions to this problem is to find active compounds that are effective not only against active Mycobacterium but also against the non-replicating ones [14].
In this study, we specifically looked for marine-fungal compounds that had been tested against non-replicating (dormant) mycobacteria. Surprisingly, we found only five metabolites that had been evaluated for activity against dormant Mycobacterium, and those five did show activity (Figure 6). This highlights a major opportunity in which many marine-fungal metabolites active against replicating M. tuberculosis have yet to be tested against dormant bacteria.

2.5. Antimycobacterials from Marine-Derived Fungi

The majority of the MF antimycobacterials were derived from Aspergillus (Figure 7), comprising polyketides as the most dominant compounds, followed by alkaloids and peptides and then steroids and terpenoids. The polyketides were also widely distributed in Penicillium, Coniothyrium, Gliomastix, Fusarium, Sporendonema, and Ascochyta, showing the abundance of polyketides in fungal metabolites. We found that the antimycobacterial compounds present in Arthrinium, Tolypocladium, Trichoderma, and Talaromyces were predominantly alkaloids and peptides. However, terpenoids and steroids with antimycobacterial properties were only identified in Gliomastix and Diaporthe, as well as Aspergillus.
There was a significant disparity in the number of compounds isolated from Aspergillus compared to other genera. Aspergillus yielded almost 60 antimycobacterial metabolites, whereas other genera produced fewer than 10 antimycobacterial compounds each. However, those compounds from the Aspergillus genus were derived from 20 Aspergillus species, yielding approximately 5–6 compounds per species, while other genera, such as Fusarium and Penicillium, consisted of five species each. Some of the genera only consisted of two species, such as Gliomastix, Nigrospora, and Zopfiella, and the rest only consisted of one species each. Aspergillus was found to be the most abundant genus in both marine and terrestrial environments and contributed most bioactive secondary metabolites, followed by Penicillium, making them the most potential sources for bioactive metabolite exploration, including novel compounds [16,17,18,19].
We attempted to plot the distribution of fungi from marine sources to determine the prevalence of fungal genera capable of producing antimycobacterial metabolites (Figure 8). Marine sediment contributed the greatest number of MF species with antimycobacterial metabolites, followed by mangroves, marine sponges, and marine algae. Fewer MF were obtained from sea fan, coral, marine anemone, and ascidian. Aspergillus producing antimycobacterial metabolites was mainly found in marine sediments, mangroves, and sponges. Some of the lesser-studied genera capable of producing novel antimycobacterial compounds were apparently endophytic fungi, such as Coniothyrium (derived from marine alga), Trichoderma (from marine sponge), Talaromyces (from mangrove), Phoma (from marine sponge), and Tolypocladium (from marine alga). Other promising but underexplored genera capable of producing novel compounds with antimycobacterial activity were derived from marine sediments, including Arthrinium, Pleosporales, Sporendonema, and Zopfiella.
In the following sub-sections, we describe in detail the activity of each compound, summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. To ease the categorization of the antimycobacterial activity, we recalculated any MIC or IC50 value from µg/mL into µM. We classified the antimycobacterial activity into strong, moderate, and weak activity based on the MIC or IC50 values. According to Cos and colleagues, anti-infectives from natural products can be categorized as “active” if the IC50 value is below 25 µM for pure compounds. Also, according to Elsebai, an inhibition zone of more than >15 mm from a 20 µg/disc of compound was considered to have considerable activity. Hence, we categorized compounds with IC50 ≤ 6.25 µM or inhibition zone > 15 mm as having strong activity, 6.25 µM < IC50 ≤ 25 µM or 10 mm < inhibition zone ≤ 15 mm as having moderate activity, and >25 µM or inhibition zone ≤ 10 mm as having weak activity. If the compound activity was stated by the MIC, then compounds with MIC ≤ 12.5 µM had strong activity, 12.5 µM < MIC ≤ 50 µM had moderate activity, and MIC > 50 µM had weak activity [20].

2.5.1. Polyketides

Two polyketides, alterporriol S (1), a novel anthranoid dimer of the alterporriol type featuring a distinctive linkage between C-10 and C-2′, and a previously identified anthraquinone derivative, (+)-aS-alterporriol C (2), were obtained from the fungus Alternaria sp. SK11, which was collected from the mangrove Excoecaria agallocha (Shankou, Guangxi Province, China). Compound 2 displayed strong inhibitory activity against M. tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase B (MptpB), a critical virulence factor released by M. tuberculosis to circumvent the host’s immune response, with an IC50 value of 8.70 µM. Meanwhile, compound 1 showed weak inhibitory activity against MptpB, with an IC50 value of 64.70 µM [21]. Compound 2 (IC50 8.7 µM) adopted a classical C-10–C-10′ biaryl linkage that locked the two anthraquinone halves into an almost coplanar atropoisomeric scaffold compared with the twisted C-10–C-2′ link in compound 1 (IC50 64.7 µM). The rigidity of compound 2 likely lowered the entropic penalty of binding and enlarged the contiguous π-surface, allowing stronger π-stacking with the hydrophobic P-loop clamp of MptpB and producing a seven-fold potency gain. The coplanar geometry simultaneously positioned an extra quinone carbonyl and a C-11 methoxy-ester to project toward the Lys164/Arg166 oxyanion region adjacent to the catalytic Asp165, creating a bidentate hydrogen-bond/phosphate-mimic network that compound 1, with its twisted axis, could not achieve efficiently [21,22,23].
An investigation of the marine alga-derived fungus Ascochyta salicorniae isolated from the North Sea, Germany, led to the isolation of new epimeric compounds (ascolactones A (3) and B (4)), along with other known compounds (hyalopyrone (5), ascochitine (6), and ascochital (7)) [24]. All compounds were tested against various phosphatases, including MptpB. However, only compound 6 exhibited moderate inhibition activity, with an IC50 of 11.5 µM, while compounds 4, 5, and 7 exhibited weak activities, with IC50 values of 95, 87.8, and 61.2 µM, respectively. Compound 3 showed no inhibitory activity. This suggested that the configuration at C-1 of compounds 3 and 4 (R or S configuration) was crucial for binding and affecting the activity (Figure 9). Within the 8-hydroxynaphthalenone series, the potency increased in the order hyalopyrone (5) < ascochital (7) < ascochitine (6), suggesting a positive contribution of the para-hydroxy-prenyl sidechain present only in 6 [24]. Compound 6 was the most potent member of this set (compounds 3-7). Structurally, it was the only analogue that displayed an ortho-carboxylate flanked by two phenolic hydroxyls on a rigid chromone ring and retained two short, branched alkyl substituents. Together, these features likely match the polar Lys164/Arg166 oxyanion site and the adjacent Phe161/Tyr125 hydrophobic patch identified in multiple MptpB crystal structures, respectively [23,25]. Hyalopyrone (5) lacked carboxylate and a second phenol, hence giving it fewer hydrogen-bond donors/acceptors. Ascochital (7) preserved the dyad but lost one alkyl chain and planarity because of a saturated side arm. The ascolactones A (3) and B (4) introduced a spiro-lactone that distorted the phenol/acid alignment and, for epimer A (3), pointed the carbonyl lactone away from the catalytic Asp165, probably correlating with the sharp loss of activity. However, these geometric arguments remain hypotheses until corroborated by co-crystallography, docking with proper validation, or site-directed mutagenesis.
Two novel dimeric naphtho-ɣ-pyrones, 8′-O-demethylnigerone (8) and 8′-O-demethylisonigerone (9), and a known analogue, rubrofusarin B (10) (Figure 9), were isolated from the fungal strain Aspergillus carbonarius WZ-4-11, obtained from marine sediment collected at Weizhou Island, Guangxi Province, China. Those compounds exhibited relatively moderate antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, with MICs of 43 µM (8 and 10) and 21.5 µM (9) [26].
A chemical investigation of deep-sea-derived fungus Aspergillus fischeri FS452 led to the discovery of six new polypropionate derivatives with a unique long hydrophobic chain, fiscpropionates A–F (1116) (Figure 9). Compounds 1114 demonstrated strong to moderate inhibitory activity against MptpB, with IC50 values of 5.1, 12, 4.0, and 11 µM, respectively, while compounds 15 and 16 were inactive. Further kinetic experiments revealed that the inhibitory mechanism was noncompetitive. Interestingly, different activities between compounds 1114 and 16 might have been derived from the different hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of the opposing terminal functional groups of 1114. Compounds 1114 possessed polar carboxyl and alkyl chains (C-12 to C-18) at the opposing terminal, while compound 16 was only substituted by the hydrophilic functional group at C-11. Furthermore, compound 14 was more active than 15, which suggested the significance of the E configuration of the Δ6 double bond [27]. The potency in the fiscpropionate series likely tracked with the preservation of a tripartite pharmacophore: (1) an E-configured α,β-unsaturated carbonyl flanked by a β-OH; (2) a terminal carboxylate or imide; and (3) a linear, methyl-branched aliphatic chain [27]. Fiscpropionate C (13) (IC50 4 µM) was most active likely because of its acyclic backbone, allowing for the optimal alignment of the enone/β-OH while keeping the required acid tail [23,25]. Fiscpropionate A (11) (IC50 5.1 µM) was slightly less potent yet still benefited most likely from the intact conjugated β-hydroxy-ketone, whereas fiscpropionate B (12) (IC50 12 µM) lost activity after the reduction of this motif, and fiscpropionate D (14) (IC50 11 µM) suffered from the weaker, less acidic imide handle. We speculate that the inactive fiscpropionates E (15) and F (16) abolish key hydrogen-bonding vectors and over-alkylate the chain (or append a bulky aryl), further reducing binding by preventing proper insertion and electrostatic engagement, thus failing to inhibit the phosphatase.
Song and colleagues reported two compounds, emodin (17) and trypacidin (18) (Figure 10), discovered from Aspergillus fumigatus MF029 isolated from the marine sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis, obtained from the Bohai Sea, China. Both compounds demonstrated strong inhibition against Mycobacterium bovis BCG, with an MIC value of 1.25 µg/mL (4.6 and 3.63 µM, respectively) [28]. A separate study on 17 as an antimycobacterial revealed that its mechanism of action is targeting the G-quadruplex structure of mycobacterial genetic material. The molecule binds and thermally stabilizes G4 DNA motifs in the mosR (redox-stress regulator) and ndhA (NADH dehydrogenase) genes of M. tuberculosis, which suppresses their transcription and slows bacillary growth [29].
A new tetrahydroxanthone dimer, 5-epi-asperdichrome (19) (Figure 10), was discovered from Aspergillus versicolor HDN1009, isolated from soil around a mangrove area in Guangzhou, China. Compound 19 showed weak inhibitory activity against Mycobacterium phlei, with an MIC of 200 µM [30].
Solid rice fermentation of sponge-derived Aspergillus niger LS24 led to the discovery of three novel and one known 4-hydroxy-α-pyrones, nipyrones A–C (2022) and germicidin C (23) (Figure 10), respectively. All compounds demonstrated weak antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis, with MICs for 20, 21, and 23 of 128 µg/mL (570.66 µM, 537.093 µM, and 702.486 µM, respectively) and 22 of 64 µg/mL (251.652 µM) [31].
Prenylterphenyllin J (24) (Figure 10), a prenylated p-terphenyl isolated from the mangrove endophytic fungus Aspergillus candidus LDJ-5, showed weak antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with an IC50 of 45 µg/mL (99.88 µM). The fungus was obtained from the root of Rhizophora apiculata Blume collected from Sanya Bailu Park of Hainan Province, China [32].
A racemic of known dinaphthalenone derivatives, (±)-asperlone A (25), (±)-asperlone B (26), and (–)-mitorubrin (27) (Figure 10), were isolated from the mangrove-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. 16-5c. The fungal strain was obtained from leaves of the mangrove Sonneratia apetala, collected in Hainan Island, China. The compounds were tested against MptpB and demonstrated strong inhibitory activity, with IC50 values of 4.24, 4.32, and 3.99 µM, respectively [33]. Compounds 2527 shared a rigid, nearly coplanar 1,4-diketone core flanked by phenolic or β-hydroxy groups. This carbonyl–phenol dyad is consistent with the dianionic pharmacophore required to engage the Lys164/Arg166 oxyanion pocket of MptpB, and the extended π-surface could plausibly interact with the hydrophobic Phe161–Tyr125 wall characteristic of the enzyme’s unusually wide active site [23,34,35]. All three compounds inhibited MptpB in the low-micromolar range, while peripheral variations such as a prenyl side chain (27) or methoxy substitution (25,26) appeared to fine-tune lipophilicity rather than alter the core binding motif [33].
Kamiya and colleagues re-discovered viomellein (28) and xanthomegnin (29) (Figure 10) from a culture of the Aspergillus sp. isolated from marine sponge obtained from Sabang Island, Indonesia [36]. The compounds exhibited antimycobacterial activity against M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG in both active and dormant states. Dormant Mycobacterium is a state where the cells are metabolically inactive; it has slower replication and phenotypically increased resistance to current antituberculosis treatments [37]. Compound 28 demonstrated stronger activity against M. bovis BCG (with MICs of 6.25 µg/mL (11.15 µM) for aerobic and 1.56 µg/mL (2.78 µM) for hypoxic conditions) than against M. smegmatis (with MICs of 25 µg/mL (44.6 µM) for aerobic and 50 µg/mL (89.20 µM) for hypoxic conditions), while compound 29 showed the opposite, with an MIC against M. smegmatis for both aerobic and hypoxic conditions of 12.5 µg/mL (21.76 µM) and MICs against M. bovis BCG for aerobic conditions of 25 µg/mL (43.52 µM) and hypoxic conditions of 50 µg/mL (87.03 µM). The authors suggested that the different tendencies in the antimycobacterial activity from 28 and 29 against the tested Mycobacterium strains may derive from the hydroxyl group at C-9, which makes 28 more active against M. bovis BCG than M. smegmatis, compared with 29. Interestingly, compound 28 also exhibited more potent activity against dormant M. bovis BCG compared with the control, isoniazid (MIC > 100 µg/mL) [36].
Two new tris-pyrogallol ethers, sydowiol A (30) and C (31) (Figure 10), and the known bis-pyrogallol ether, violaceol I (32), were discovered from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sydowii MF357, which was isolated from marine sediment in the East China Sea. Compounds 30 and 31 showed weak inhibitory activity against MptpA, another virulence factor secreted by M. tuberculosis that is responsible for tuberculosis pathogenicity by inhibiting phagosome–lysosome fusion [38], with IC50 values of 14 µg/mL (36.42 µM) and 24 µg/mL (62.44 µM), respectively, while 32 was inactive. Interestingly, an in vitro assay against M. tuberculosis H37Rv (in the same study) showed that compounds 30 and 31 were inactive, while compound 32 was weakly active, with an MIC of 25 µg/mL (95.33 µM). These results suggest that compounds 30 and 31 do not directly inhibit mycobacterial cells but rather neutralize the effect of MptpA, leading to enhanced host immune response and reduced viable bacteria. Although 32 may not demonstrate any alteration in the survival of mycobacterial cells post-infection of the macrophage, instead, it can directly inhibit mycobacterial cell growth [39]. The inhibition of MptpA likely improves when the scaffold can present three coplanar pyrogallol phenolates. Sydowiol A (30), with para/para ether bridges, retained full coplanarity and inhibited the phosphatase at IC50 = 14 µg/mL (36 µM). Shifting one bridge to an ortho position in sydowiol C (31) twisted the central ring, misaligned one phenolate, and reduced activity to IC50 = 24 µg/mL (62 µM), while both compounds showed only weak whole-cell activity (MIC > 50 µg/mL) against M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv [39]. Violaceol I (32) contained only two pyrogallol units and was inactive against MptpA but displayed modest antibacterial activity (MIC = 25 µg/mL) that was attributed to non-specific oxidative stress. Although a co-crystal was lacking, molecular models based on the MptpA NMR structure (PDB 2LUO) suggested that three well-oriented phenolates were needed to satisfy the Lys21/Arg24 oxyanion site, whereas compounds offering only two donors formed sub-optimal contacts [40]. Hence, we speculate that the enzymatic potency correlated with the ability to deliver a coplanar, tri-dentate phenolate array, whereas whole-cell efficacy was governed by size and polarity rather than precise active-site binding.
A known compound, butyrolactone I (33) (Figure 10), was re-discovered from Aspergillus terreus SCSIO 41008, a marine-derived fungal isolated from sponge Callyspongia sp. obtained from Xuwen County, Guangdong, China. The compound exhibited strong, non-competitive inhibitory activity against MptpB, with an IC50 value of 5.11 µM [41]. Butyrolactone I (33) possessed a rigid, nearly coplanar γ-butyrolactone–aryl core bearing two conjugated carbonyls and flanking resorcinol OH groups. This carbonyl–phenol dyad is consistent with the dianionic pharmacophore that engages the Lys164/Arg166 oxyanion pocket of MptpB, and its extended π-surface could plausibly interact with the Phe161–Tyr125 hydrophobic wall seen in the crystal structure (PDB 2OZ5) [23,35]. The fused lactone rigidifies the aromatic array, lowering the entropic cost of binding, while the prenyl side chain may occupy part of the shallow lipophilic groove adjacent to Leu199. Together, these features rationalize the low-micromolar potency of butyrolactone I (IC50 = 5.11 µM) and mirror the design logic observed for other planar, phenolate-rich inhibitors such as (±)-asperlones (2526) and (+)-aS-alterporriol C (2) [23].
A chemical investigation of the fermentation of marine sponge-derived Aspergillus sp. SCSIO XWS03F03 on a solid rice medium led to the isolation of secalonic acid D (34) (Figure 10). The bioactivity assay of 34 revealed that it demonstrated strong antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis, with an IC50 of 1.26 µM [42].
Elsebai and colleagues reported nine compounds with antimycobacterial activity from Coniothyrium cereale, isolated from the marine alga Enteromorpha sp. collected from Fehmarn, the Baltic Sea. Five compounds were new phenalenone derivatives—(Z)-coniosclerodinol (35), (15S, 17S)-(–)-sclerodinol (36), conioscleroderolide (37), coniosclerodione (38), and coniolactone (39)—while the rest were known compounds, namely, (–)-7,8-dihydro-3,6-dihydroxy-1,7,7,8-tetramethyl-5H-furo-[2’,3’:5,6]naphtho[1,8-bc]furan-5-one (40), (–)-scleroderolide (41), (–)-sclerodione (42), and (–)-trypethelone (43) (Figure 11). Those compounds exhibited antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with the inhibition zone in the range of 10 – 22 mm at a concentration of 20 µg/disc [43,44].
New fusarielins, fusarielin M (44) and N (45), along with a known fusarielin, fusarielin G (46), were isolated from the marine-derived fungus Fusarium graminearum SYSU-MS5127, isolated from sea anemone obtained from Laishizhou Island, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China. Those compounds were tested against MptpB, MptpA, and human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). Compound 44 demonstrated strong MptpB inhibitory activity, with an IC50 value of 1.05 µM. It also inhibited MptpA (IC50 = 23.78 µM) and PTP1B (IC 50 = 15.74 µM), which indicated high specificity for MptpB over MptpA and PTP1B. Compound 45 showed no measurable inhibition against MptpB (IC 50 > 40 µM), which suggested that the hydroxyl group at C-3 fusarielin (Figure 11) possessed essential activity as an MptpB inhibitor. Moreover, compound 46 showed less potency as an MptpB inhibitor (IC50 = 23.75 µM) compared with 44, which indicated that MptpB inhibition was hampered by the decalin’s moiety epoxy bond group (Figure 11). An investigation of the cellular activity of 44 revealed that 44 restored the MAPK signaling pathway, which was affected by MptpB. Furthermore, an increased concentration of 44 significantly reduced the mycobacterial growth inside the macrophage without altering macrophage viability, which excluded the possibility of cytotoxicity effects of high concentrations of 44 against mycobacterial cells. An in silico study showed that 44 resided inside the MptpB active site, connected by a hydrogen bond from the carboxylate group of 44 with the side chain of Asp165, a residue in the phosphate-binding loop (P-loop). Asp165 was reported as a unique feature of MptpB [45], which may explain the selectivity of 44 as an MptpB inhibitor [46]. Docking into the 2OZ5 crystal structure predicted that its free C-3 β-OH could hydrogen-bond to the catalytic Asp165, while the nearly planar decalin–polyene backbone may extend along the Phe161/Tyr125 hydrophobic wall [23]. O-methylation of the hydroxyl (45) or epoxidation of the decalin core (46) reduced activity, supporting a working model in which (i) an unhindered C-3 phenolic donor, (ii) a rigid conjugated polyene that fits the shallow lipophilic groove, and (iii) limited steric bulk around the phenol are key for high affinity. Direct co-crystal or kinetic data with MptpA and human PTPs are still lacking, so the exact binding pose remains to be confirmed.
Three compounds, 9α-hydroxyhalorosellinia (47), nigrosporin B (48), and anhydrofusarubin (49) (Figure 12), were re-discovered from marine-derived Fusarium spp. PSU-F14 and PSU-F135, isolated from gorgonian sea fan (Annella sp.) collected near Koh Hin Ran Pet, Suratthani Province, Thailand. Those compounds exhibited moderate antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, with MIC values of 39, 41, and 47 µM, respectively [47].
An investigation of the extract of Metarhizium anisopliae mxh-99, isolated from marine sponge from Naozhou Island, China, led to the isolation of isochaetochromin B2 (50) and ustilaginoidin D (51) (Figure 12). Both compounds demonstrated weak antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with an MIC value of 50 µg/mL (91.15 and 91.49 µM, respectively) [48].
4-deoxybostrycin (52) and its deoxy-derivative, 48, were isolated from the endophytic fungus Nigrospora sp., which was obtained from the decayed wood of mangrove Kandelia candel (L.) Druce, collected from Mai Po, Hong Kong. The compounds were tested against various M. strains, both sensitive and resistant to antituberculosis agents (drug-resistant). Compound 52 was moderately active against M. bovis BCG, M. tuberculosis H37Rv, the clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain K2903531 (resistant to SM, INH, RF, and ETH), the clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain 0907961 (resistant to SM and ETH), the clinical drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strain K0903557 (resistant to INH), and clinical drug-sensitive M. tuberculosis, with MIC values of 39, 15, <5, 10, 30, and 10 µg/mL, respectively (121.76, 46.83, 15.61, 31.22, 93.67, and 31.22 µM, respectively), while 48 was also moderately active against M. bovis BCG, M. tuberculosis H37Rv, the clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain K2903531 (resistant to SM, INH, RF, and ETH), the clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain 0907961 (resistant to SM and ETH), and the clinical drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strain K0903557 (resistant to INH), with MIC values of 15, 20, 30, 20, and 30 µg/mL, respectively (49.30, 65.73, 98.59, 65.73, and 98.59 µM, respectively) [49].
An endophytic fungus, Penicillium citrinum WK-P9, isolated from the marine sponge Suberea sp., produced two known citrinin derivatives, penicitrinone A (53) and penicitrinol J (54) (Figure 12). Compounds 53 and 54 exhibited weak antimycobacterial properties against M. smegmatis ATCC607, with an MIC value of 32 µg/mL (84.11 and 75.04 µM, respectively) [50].
Two new peniphenones, peniphenone B (55) and C (56) (Figure 12), with MptpB inhibitory activity were discovered from Penicillium dipodomyicola HN4-3A. The fungal strain was isolated from the stem of Acanthus ilicifolius obtained from the South China Sea, Hainan Province, China. Compounds 55 and 56 exhibited strong inhibitory properties against MptpB in vitro, with IC50 values of 0.16 and 1.37 µM, respectively [51]. Compound 55 was 9-fold more potent than its oxidized analogue 56. A plausible explanation is that 55 retains three phenolic OH groups (one on the lower resorcinol ring and an ortho-dihydroxyl (catechol) pair on the upper ring) and an ether oxygen, in which these four hetero-atoms provide multiple hydrogen-bond donors/acceptors that could engage the polar residues lining the MptpB active site, while the fully aromatic, conjugated scaffold supplies an extended π-surface for hydrophobic or π-stacking contacts with residues such as Tyr125 and Phe161 that flank the shallow binding cleft [34,35]. In compound 56, oxidation of the upper catechol to a para-benzoquinone replaced two hydroxyl donors with carbonyl groups and left only a single phenol available for deprotonation; hence, concomitant electron withdrawal was expected to lower the basicity of the remaining OH and central benzophenone carbonyl, cumulatively weakening potential hydrogen-bond and electrostatic interactions [51]. Because the overall backbone and substitution pattern remained similar, the loss of potency in compound 56 can be reasonably attributed to the reduced number and strength of polar contacts rather than to major conformational effects.
An Antarctica-associated fungi, Penicillium sp. HDN151272, isolated from unidentified sponge, produced three new polyketides, ketidocillinones A–C (5759). All compounds were tested against M. phlei, with only 58 and 59 exhibiting antimycobacterial activity, with MIC values of 3.13 and 6.25 µg/mL, respectively (11.84 and 26.23 µM, respectively). Compound 57 did not show inhibition activity against M. phlei, which indicated the importance of the methoxy group of compounds 58 and 59 (Figure 12) for the antimycobacterial activity [52].
A mangrove-associated fungus, Penicillium pinophilum SCAU037, produced a known hydrogenated azaphilone, Sch725680 (60), which exhibited moderate antimycobacterial activity against M. smegmatis, with an MIC value of 23.5 µM [53].
Further chemical investigation of a marine alga-derived Penicillium roseopurpureum KP1-135C extract led to the isolation of three halogenated bianthrones, neobulgarones D–F (6163), and their antibacterial activities were investigated. The study reported that only the cis isomers, compounds 61 and 63 (Figure 12), exhibited weak antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra ATCC 25177, with IC50 values of 46.1 and 31.1 µM, respectively. The trans isomer, 62, however, did not show antimycobacterial activity but exhibited moderate inhibition against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which indicated that the cis-trans configuration of neobulgarones may affect the selectivity of antibacterial–antimycobacterial activity [54].
A marine sediment-derived Pleosporales sp. HDN1811400 produced a new phenalenone derivative, peniciphenalenin G (64), and two known analogues, 36 and 38, which exhibited antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with MIC values of 50, 25, and 25 µM, respectively [55].
New anthraquinone derivatives, auxarthrols D (65), F (66), and G (67), along with two known analogues, 4-dehydroxyaltersolanol A (68) and altersolanol B (69) (Figure 12), were isolated from Sporendonema casei HDN16-802, which was obtained from marine sediment from Liaoning Province, China. All compounds exhibited antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with MIC values in the range of 25–200 µM. However, only 69 exhibited inhibitory activity against M. tuberculosis, with an MIC value of 20 µM [56].
Marine-derived fungus Zopfiella marina produced a new salicylaldehyde derivative, 2-hydroxy-6-((1E,3E)-7-hydroxyundeca-1,3dienyl)benzaldehyde (70) (Figure 13), with weak antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, with an MIC value of 25 µg/mL (86.69 µM) [57].
Bunyapaiboonsri and colleagues reported an unidentified mangrove-associated fungus BCC 25093, which produced two new palmarumycins, palmarumycins P1 (71) and P3 (72) (Figure 13), along with two known palmarumycins, palmarumycins CP3 (73) and CR1 (74), and two known decaspirones, decaspirones A (75) and C (76), with potential antimycobacterial activity. The strongest activity was shown by 71 and 75, with an IC50 value of 1.56 µg/mL (4.23 and 4.64 µM, respectively), followed by 73 and 76 (IC50 = 3.13 µg/mL or 9.36 and 9.25 µM, respectively) and 72 and 74 (IC50 = 12.5 µg/mL or 35.28 and 36.51 µM, respectively) [58].
Another unidentified, novel, marine-derived fungus strain 110162 in the Eurotiomycetes class was reported to produce a racemic of prenylated polyketide dimer, oxazinin A (77), with a pentacyclic structure formed with an unusual combination of benzoxazine, isoquinoline, and a pyran ring (Figure 13). Compound 77 also exhibited a strong antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis, with an IC50 value of 2.9 µM [59].
Penixylarin C (78), a novel alkyl aromatic compound (Figure 13), was isolated from a mangrove-associated fungus Xylaria sp. HDN13-249. It exhibited a strong antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with an MIC value of 6.25 µM [60].
Table 1. Polyketide NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
Table 1. Polyketide NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
No.Metabolites [Novelties at the Time of Isolation]Producing StrainsMarine SourcesFermentation Media and MethodTested Against Mycobacterium Strain/Mycobacterial EnzymePotencyMechanism of ActionRef.
1alterporriol S [N] aAlternaria sp. SK1Root of mangrove Excoecaria agallochaPotato glucose liquid medium, static condition, 26 °C, 4 weeksMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 64.7 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[21]
2(+)-aS-alterporriol C [K] bIC50 = 8.7 µM
3ascolactone A [N]Ascochyta salicorniaeMarine alga Ulva sp.Solid medium (biomalt extract 2%, agar 1.5%, ASW * 80%), static condition, room temp., 52 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBNA **-[24]
4ascolactone B [N]IC50 = 95 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB
5hyalopyrone [K]IC50 = 87.8 µM
6ascochitine [K]IC50 = 11.5 µM
7ascochital [K]IC50 = 61.2 µM
88′-O-demethylnigerone [N]Aspergillus carbonarius WZ-4-11Marine sedimentLiquid medium (glucose 2%, peptone 0.5%, malt extract 0.3%, yeast extract 0.3%, sea water pH 7.0), static condition, 24 °C, 30 daysM. tuberculosis H37RvIC50 = 43 µMNR ***[26]
98′-O-demethylisonigerone [N]IC50 = 21.5 µM
10rubrofusarin B [K] IC50 = 43 µM
11fiscpropionate A [N]Aspergillus fisheri FS452Marine sedimentSolid medium (rice 250 g, 400 mL H2O, natural sea salt 0.3%), static condition, room temp., 30 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 5.1 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[27]
12fiscpropionate B [N]IC50 = 12 µM
13fiscpropionate C [N]IC50 = 4 µM
14fiscpropionate D [N]IC50 = 11 µM
15fiscpropionate E [N]NA-
16fiscpropionate F [N]NA-
17emodin [K]Aspergillus fumigatus MF029Marine sponge H. perleveSolid medium (160 g rice, 200 mL H2O), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. bovis BCGIC50 = 1.25 µg/mL
(4.6 µM)
Bind and thermally stabilize G4 DNA motifs in the mosR (redox-stress regulator) and ndhA (NADH dehydrogenase) genes of M. tuberculosis[28,29]
18trypacidin [K]IC50 = 1.25 µg/mL (3.63 µM)NR
195-epi-asperdichrome [N]Aspergillus versicolor HDN1009Soil around mangroveLiquid medium (maltose 2%, mannitol 2%, glucose 1%, monosodium glutamate 1%, MgSO4.7H2O 0.03%, KH2PO4 0.05%, yeast extract 0.3%, corn steep liquor 0.1%, ASW), static condition, 28 °C, 14 daysM. phleiMIC = 200 µMNR[30]
20nipyrone A [N]Aspergillus niger LS24Marine sponge Haliclona sp.Solid medium (100 g rice, 160 mL H2O), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. tuberculosis H37RvMIC = 128 µg/mL (570.66 µM)NR[31]
21nipyrone B [N]MIC = 128 µg/mL (537.093 µM)
22nipyrone C [N]MIC = 64 µg/mL (251.652 µM)
23germicidin C [K]MIC = 128 µg/mL (702.486 µM)
24prenylterphenyllin J [K]Aspergillus candidus LDJ-5Root of mangrove Rhizophora apiculata BlumeLiquid medium (mannitol 2%, monosodium glutamate 1%, maltose 3%, yeast extract 0.3%, glucose 1%, corn steep liquor 0.1%, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 0.03%, monopotassium phosphate 0.05%, H2O), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. phleiMIC = 45 µg/mL (99.88 µM)NR[32]
25(±)-asperlone A [K]Aspergillus sp. 16-5cLeaves of mangrove Sonneratia apetalaLiquid medium (glucose 1.5%, sea salt 0.3% in potato infusion), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 4.24 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[33]
26(±)-asperlone B [K]IC50 = 4.32 µM
27(–)-mitorubrin [K]IC50 = 3.99 µM
28viomellein [K]Aspergillus sp. 02E28_2-2Unidentified marine spongeSolid medium (250 g unpolished rice, 500 ASW), static condition, 30 °C, 14 daysM. smegmatis mc2155MIC aerobic = 25 µg/mL (44.6 µM); hypoxic = 50 µg/mL (89.20 µM)NR[36]
M. bovis BCGMIC aerobic = 6.25 µg/mL (11.15 µM); hypoxic = 1.56 µg/mL (2.78 µM)
29xanthomegnin [K]M. smegmatis mc2155MIC aerobic = 12.5 µg/mL (21.76 µM); hypoxic = 12.5 µg/mL (21.76 µM)
M. bovis BCGMIC aerobic = 25 µg/mL (43.52 µM); hypoxic = 50 µg/mL (87.03 µM)
30sydowiol A [N]Aspergillus sydowii MF357Marine sedimentSolid medium (130 g rice, 80 mL ASW), static condition, 25 °C, 20 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpAIC50 = 14 µg/mL (36.42 µM)Inhibit virulence factor MptpA[39]
M. bovis BCGNA-
M. tuberculosis H37RvNA-
31sydowiol C [N]Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpAIC50 = 24 µg/mL (62.44 µM)Inhibit virulence factor MptpA
M. bovis BCGMIC = 100 µg/mL (260.16 µM)NR
M. tuberculosis H37RvNA-
32violaceol I [K]Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpANA-
M. bovis BCGNA-
M. tuberculosis H37RvMIC = 25 µg/mL (95.33 µM)NR
33butyrolactone I [K]Aspergillus terreus SCSIO 41008Marine sponge Callyspongia sp.Liquid medium (potato 20%, peptone 0.5%, mannitol 2%, maltose 2%, glucose 2%, monosodium glutamate 0.5%, yeast extract 0.3%, sea salt 2%) in fermenter (28 °C, 135 rpm, 12 L/min aseptic air, 3 Mpa for 7 days)Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 5.11 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[41]
34secalonic acid D [K]Aspergillus sp. SCSIO XWS03F03Unidentified marine spongeSolid medium (200 g rice, 2 g sea salt, 200 mL H2O, supplemented with NaCl 1%), static condition, 25 °C, 45 daysM. tuberculosisIC50 = 1.26 µMNR[42]
35(Z)-coniosclerodinol [N]Coniothyrium cerealeMarine alga Enteromorpha sp.Solid BMS medium, static condition, room temp., 40 daysM. phleiZI = 16 mmNR[43,44]
36(15S, 17S)-(–)-sclerodinol [N]ZI = 20 mm
37conioscleroderolide [N]ZI = 10 mm
38coniosclerodione [N]ZI = 12 mm
39coniolactone [N]ZI = 22 mm
40(–)-7,8-dihydro-3,6-dihydroxy-1,7,7,8-tetramethyl-5H-furo-[2’,3’:5,6]naphtho[1,8-bc]furan-5-one [K]ZI = 12 mm
41(–)-scleroderolide [K]ZI = 14 mm
42(–)-sclerodione [K]ZI = 10 mm
43(–)-trypethelone [K]ZI = 18 mm
44fusarielin M [N] Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 1.05 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[46]
Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpAIC50 = 23.78 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpA
45fusarielin N [N]Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpBNA-
Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpANA-
46fusarielin G [K]Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 23.75 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB
Mycobacterial Enzyme MptpANA-
479α-hydroxyhalorosellinia [K]Fusarium spp. PSU-F15Marine gorgonian sea fan Annella sp.Liquid medium (potato dextrose broth), static condition, room temp., 28 daysM. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 39 µMNR[47,49]
M. bovis BCGNA
M. tuberculosis H37RvNA
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain
(K2903531, resistant to SM, INH, RFP, and EMB)
NA
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain
(0907961, resistant to SM and EMB)
NA
Clinical drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strain (K0903557, resistant to INH)NA
48nigrosporin B [K]M. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 41 µM
M. bovis BCGMIC = 15 µg/mL (49.30 µM)
M. tuberculosis H37RvMIC = 20 (65.73 µM) µg/mL
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain
(K2903531, resistant to SM, INH, RFP, and EMB)
MIC = 30 (98.59 µM) µg/mL
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain
(0907961, resistant to SM and EMB)
MIC = 20 (65.73 µM) µg/mL
Clinical drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strain (K0903557, resistant to INH)MIC = 30 (98.59 µM) µg/mL
49anhydrofusarubin [K]M. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 87 µM
M. bovis BCGNA
M. tuberculosis H37RvNA
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain
(K2903531, resistant to SM, INH, RFP, and EMB)
NA
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain
(0907961, resistant to SM and EMB)
NA
Clinical drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strain (K0903557, resistant to INH)NA
50isochaetochromin B2 [K]Metarhizium anisopliae mxh-99Unidentified marine spongeLiquid medium (mannitol 2%, maltose 2%, glucose 1%, monosodium glutamate 1%, KH2PO4 0.05%, MgSO4.7H2O 0.03%, yeast extract 0.3%, corn steep liquor 0.1%, ASW pH 6.5), agitated condition (165 rpm), 28 °C, 8 daysM. phleiMIC = 50 µg/mL (91.15 µM)NR[48]
51ustilaginoidin D [K]MIC = 50 µg/mL (91.49 µM)
524-deoxybostrycin [K]Nigrospora sp.Unidentified sea anemoneFermentation from Nigrospora sp. was not explained in detailM. bovis BCGMIC = 39 µg/mL (121.76 µM)NR[49]
M. tuberculosis H37RvMIC = 15 µg/mL (46.83 µM)
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain K2903531 (resistant to SM, INH, RF, and ETH)MIC = < 5 µg/mL
(< 15.61 µM)
Clinical MDR M. tuberculosis strain 0907961 (resistant to SM and ETH)MIC = 10 µg/mL (31.22 µM)
Clinical drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strain K0903557 (resistant to INH)MIC = 30 µg/mL (93.67 µM)
Clinical drug-sensitive M. tuberculosisMIC = 10 µg/mL (31.22 µM)
53penicitrinone A [K]Penicillium citrinum WK-P9Marine sponge Suberea sp.Liquid medium (malt extract broth), static condition, 24 °C, 12 daysM. smegmatis ATCC 607MIC = 32 µg/mL (84.11 µM)NR[50]
54penicitrinol J [K]MIC = 32 µg/mL (75.04 µM)
55peniphenone B [N]Penicillium dipodomyicola HN4-3AStem of mangrove Acanthus ilicifoliusLiquid medium (20 g glucose, 2 g sea salt in 1 L of potato infusion), static condition, 25–30 °C, 30 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 0.16 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[51]
56peniphenone C [N]IC50 = 1.37 µM
57ketidocillinone A [N]Penicillium sp. HDN151272Unidentified marine spongeLiquid medium ((glucose 1%, maltose 2%, mannitol 2%, monosodium glutamate 1%, KH2PO4 0.05%, MgSO4.7H2O 0.03%, corn steep liquor 0.1%, yeast extract 0.3% in addition to natural sea water pH 6.5), agitated condition, 28 °C, 9 daysM. phleiNANR[52]
58ketidocillinone B [N]MIC = 3.13 µg/mL (11.84 µM)
59ketidocillinone C [N]MIC = 6.25 µg/mL (26.23 µM)
60Sch725680 [K]Penicillium pinophilum SCAU037Roots of mangrove Rhizophora stylosaLiquid medium (yeast extract 0.3%, malt extract 0.3%, peptone 0.5%, glucose 2%, sorbitol 2%, sea salt 3%), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. smegmatis ATCC 60723.5 µMNR[53]
61neobulgarone D [K]Penicillium roseopurpureum KP1-13Brown alga Petalonia fasciaLiquid medium (malt extract broth 2%), agitated condition at 150 rpm, room temp., 14 daysM. tuberculosis H37Ra ATCC 25177IC50 = 46.1 µMNR[54]
62neobulgarone E [K]NA
63neobulgarone F [K]IC50 = 31.1 µM
64peniciphenalenin G [N]Pleosporales sp. HDN1811400Marine sedimentLiquid medium (yeast extract 0.3%, malt extract 0.3%, peptone 0.5%, glucose 2% dissolved in naturally collected seawater), static condition, 28 °C, 35 daysM. phleiMIC = 50 µMNR[55]
65auxarthrol D [N]Sporendonema casei HDN16-802Marine sedimentSolid medium (53 g oatmeal, 125 mL natural seawater), static condition, room temp., 30 daysM. phleiMIC = 25 µMNR[56]
M. tuberculosisNA
66auxarthrol F [N]M. phleiMIC = 200 µM
M. tuberculosisNA
67auxarthrol G [N]M. phleiMIC = 50 µM
M. tuberculosisNA
684-dehydroxyaltersolanol A [K]M. phleiMIC = 25 µM
M. tuberculosisNA
69altersolanol B [K]M. phleiMIC = 25 µM
M. tuberculosisMIC = 20 µM
702-hydroxy-6-((1E,3E)-7-hydroxyundeca-1,3dienyl)benzaldehyde [N]Zopfiella marinaMarine sedimentLiquid medium (glucose 4%, yeast extract 0.5%, MgSO4.7H2O 0.1%, KH2PO4 0.1% in distilled water), static condition, 25 °C, 35 daysM. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 25 µg/mL (86.69 µM)NR[57]
71palmarumycin P1 [N]Unidentified marine-derived fungus BCC 250093Unidentified mangrove woodLiquid medium (potato dextrose broth), agitated condition at 200 rpm, 25 °C, 20 daysM. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 1.56 µg/mL (4.23 µM)NR[58]
72palmarumycin P3 [N]MIC = 12.5 µg/mL (35.28 µM)
73palmarumycin CP3 [K]MIC = 1.56 µg/mL (4.64 µM)
74palmarumycin CR1 [K]MIC = 3.13 µg/mL (9.36 µM)
75decaspirone A [K]MIC = 3.13 µg/mL (9.25 µM)
76decaspirone C [K]MIC = 12.5 µg/mL (36.51 µM)
77oxazinin A [N]Xylaria sp. HDN13-249Root of mangrove Sonneratia caseolarisSolid medium (soluble starch 4%, yeast extract 0.1%, MgSO4 0.3%, monosodium glutamate 0.2%, sucrose 4%, KH2PO4 0.05%, maltose 3%, bean flour 0.05%, peptone 0.2%, agar powder 2.5%, seawater), 28 °C, 30 daysM. phleiMIC = 6.25 µMNR[59]
78penixylarin C [N]Xylaria sp. HDN13-249Root of mangrove Sonneratia caseolarisSolid medium (soluble starch 4%, yeast extract 0.1%, MgSO4 0.3%, monosodium glutamate 0.2%, sucrose 4%, KH2PO4 0.05%, maltose 3%, bean flour 0.05%, peptone 0.2%, agar powder 2.5%, seawater), 28 °C, 30 days M. phleiMIC = 6.25 µMNR[60]
* ASW = artificial sea water; ** NA = not active; *** NR = mechanism of action not reported; a N = novel compound; b K = known compound.

2.5.2. Peptides and Alkaloids

A collection of novel 4-hydroxy-2-pyridone alkaloids, designated as arthpyrones F-I (7982), along with a previously identified compound, apiosporamide (83) (Figure 14), were isolated from the deep-sea fungus Arthrinium sp. UJNMF008, which was obtained from the South China Sea. Compound 83 strongly inhibited M. smegmatis, with an IC50 of 2.20 µM, and 79, 81, and 82 exhibited moderate to weak antimycobacterial activity, with IC50 values in the range of 11.4–35.3 µM, while 80 showed no activity up to 50 µM. Compared with 79, compound 80 showed a significant loss of activity against M. smegmatis, indicating that the hydroxyl at C-20 may be responsible for the activity [61].
Two indole alkaloids, chaetoglobosins A (84) and B (85) (Figure 14), were re-discovered from the marine alga-derived Aspergillus fumigatus AF3-093A collected from the North Atlantic. They displayed antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis, with IC50 values of 5 and 22 µM, respectively [62].
A chemical investigation of the ethyl acetate extract of marine sponge-derived fungus Aspergillus insulicola HDN151418 led to the discovery of two new aspochracin-type cyclic tripeptides, sclerotiotides M (86) and N (87) (Figure 14). Cyclic peptides, crucial metabolites found abundantly in various marine organisms [63,64,65,66,67,68], often feature a distinctive macrocyclic ring and a polyketide side chain in the structure of aspochracin-type cyclic tripeptides. These macrocyclic rings commonly comprise a 12-membered ring (consisting of Ala-Val-Orn) or a 13-membered ring (comprising Ala-Val-Lys). To date, only 15 variants of aspochracin-type cyclic tripeptides have been isolated from their natural origins. A bioactivity assay showed that 86 and 87 exhibited strong to moderate antimycobacterial activity, with MIC values of 3.13 and 12.5 µM, respectively [69].
Two diketopiperazine alkaloids with antimycobacterial activity, gliotoxin (88) and 12,13-dihydroxy-fumitremorgin C (89) (Figure 14), were obtained from the marine-derived Aspergillus sp. SCSIO Ind09F01. The fungus was isolated from deep-sea marine sediments (4530 m below sea level) collected from the Indian Ocean. Compounds 88 and 89 demonstrated strong antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, with MIC50 values of <0.03 and 2.41 µM, respectively. Another compound with a tetracyclic triterpenoid structure, helvolic acid (116), also exhibited antimycobacterial properties (this will be described later) [70].
Three new cycloheptapeptides, asperversiamides A–C (9092) (Figure 14), were successfully discovered from Aspergillus versicolor CHNSCLM-0063, isolated from the gorgonian coral Rumphella aggregata in South China. Based on the antimycobacterial assay against M. marinum and M. tuberculosis, all compounds exhibited moderate to weak activity against M. marinum, with MICs of 23.4, 81.2, and 87.5 µM, respectively, while only 91 exhibited weak antitubercular activity, with an MIC of 100 µM [71].
Six diketopiperazines were isolated from marine-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor MF030, four of which were new, brevianamides S (93), T (94), U (95), and V (96), while the other two were known, brevianamide K (97) and deoxybrevianamide E (98) (Figure 14). The fungal strain was obtained from marine sediment (60 m below sea level) in the Bohai Sea, northeastern coast of China. All compounds were tested against a panel of microbes, including M. bovis BCG. All compounds displayed antimycobacterial activity, with MICs of 6.25, 50, 25, 100, 50, and 100 µg/mL, respectively (9.02, 144.76, 65.54, 286.18, 143.92, and 284.54 µM, respectively). Interestingly, all compounds showed selectivity toward M. bovis BCG (no activity against other tested microorganisms up to 100 µg/mL), with compound 93 being the most active against M. bovis BCG. This discovery highlights the noteworthy selectivity of dimeric diketopiperazine toward M. bovis BCG [72].
Aspergillus fumigatus MF071, isolated from marine sediment (60 m below sea level) in the Bohai Sea, China, produced alkaloids fumitremorgin B (99), fumiquinazoline J (100), and 9-deacetylfumigaclavine C (101) (Figure 14), along with terpenoid helvolic acid (116), with weak antimycobacterial activity against M. smegmatis, with an MIC value of 100 µg/mL (208.52, 280.60, 308.20, and 175.84 µM, respectively) [73].
Two novel isoprenylisoindole alkaloids, diaporisoindoles A (102) and B (103), were discovered from mangrove-associated fungus Diaporthe sp. SYSU-HQ3. Those compounds were the first reported isoprenylisoindole alkaloids with a rare 1,4-benzodioxan moiety. They were tested against MptpB and it was shown that only 102 exhibited potent MptpB inhibitor activity, with an IC50 of 4.2 µM, while no inhibitory activity was observed from 103 up to 50 µM. Compounds 102 and 103 differed in the C-8 configuration, 8S or 8R (Figure 15), which indicated that the 8S configuration at C-8 is more beneficial as an MptpB inhibitor. Neither compound showed inhibitory activity against PTP1B up to 200 µM, which showed high selectivity toward MptpB. The kinetic analysis of 102 revealed that it acted as an uncompetitive inhibitor against MptpB. Compound 102 inhibited MptpB with strong activity, whereas its 8 R epimer 103 showed only weak activity at 50 µM. Since C-8 defines the relative orientation between the isoindolinone carbonyl, the neighbouring phenolic OH, and the tertiary amine, it is reasonable to propose that the 8 S stereochemistry enables these hetero-atoms to face the Lys164/Arg166/Asp165 oxyanion region, whereas the 8 R epimer directs them away and may introduce steric interference from the prenyl group. Although this hypothesis fits the observed potency gap, direct structural data are not yet available; hence, further docking or co-crystallography will be required to validate the binding pose. Another terpenoid metabolite, tenellone C (128) (which will be described later), also exhibited inhibition against MptpB [74].
A chemical investigation of the ethyl acetate extract of Fusarium sp. DZ-27, isolated from Kandelia cande (L.) Druce bark, led to the isolation of fusaric acid (104). The compound displayed inhibition activity against several mycobacterial strains, including M. bovis BCG, M. tuberculosis H37Rv, clinical multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (strain 18019, resistant to SM, INH, RF, and ETH), and clinical multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (strain 17016, resistant to SM, INH, and ETH), with MIC values of 1.8, 1.8, 30, and 30 µg/mL, respectively (10.04, 10.04, 167.40, and 167.40 µM, respectively) [75].
A unique alkaloid, talaramide A (105), was isolated from the mangrove endophytic fungus Talaromyces sp. HZ-YX1. The fungus strain was obtained from healthy leaves of the mangrove Kandelia obovata. The compound displayed antimycobacterial activity by inhibiting the mycobacterial protein kinase G (PknG), a thioredoxin-fold-containing eukaryotic-like serine/threonine protein kinase that acts as a virulence factor of M. tuberculosis responsible for the inhibition of phagolysosomal fusion [76], with an IC50 value of 55 µM [77].
Two novel lipopeptaibols, tolypocaibols A (106) and B (107), along with the known mixed nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)–polyketide–shikimate and natural product maximiscin (108) (Figure 15), were derived from marine-derived Tolypocladium sp. The fungus was isolated from the marine alga Spongomorpha arcta, collected from the shores at Green’s Point, L’ Etete, NB, Canada. All compounds were tested against a panel of microorganisms, including M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, and showed antimycobacterial activity, with an MIC of 80 µM against M. smegmatis (for compounds 106 and 107; however, compound 108 was inactive). Antitubercular activity was also observed for all compounds, with MIC values of 20, 40, and 250 µM, respectively [78].
Three novel aminolipopeptides, identified as trichoderins A (109), A1 (110), and B (111), were discovered from Trichoderma sp., a fungus derived from marine sponge, showcasing antimycobacterial properties effective against both active and dormant bacilli. Compounds 109 and 111 contained the unsual amino acid 2-amino-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-8-oxodecanoic acid (AHMOD) while 110 had 2-amino-4-methy1-8-oxodec-6-enoic acid (AMOD) (Figure 15), which may have affected the antimycobacterial activity of 109, 110, and 111. Those compounds displayed potent antimycobacterial activity against M. smegmatis, M. bovis BCG, and M. tuberculosis in aerobic and hypoxic (dormant state) conditions, with an MIC in the range of 0.02–2 µg/mL. Compounds 109 and 111 exhibited more potent activity (up to 16-fold) against all tested Mycobacterium compared with 110, especially against M. tuberculosis. MICs for aerobic and hypoxic conditions for 109 and 111 were 0.12 and 0.13 µg/mL, respectively (103 and 113 nM, respectively), while the MIC for aerobic and hypoxic conditions for 110 was 2.00 µg/mL (1.75 µM) [79]. A further study was conducted to elucidate the possible mechanism of action of 109 by using 109-resistant clones of M. smegmatis mc2155. Gene identification on the resistant clones revealed that the target region of 109 contained atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, and parts of atpA genes, which are known to express components related to mycobacterial ATP synthesis. This suggested that 109 inhibits mycobacterial cells by inhibiting the mycobacterial ATP synthesis. The prediction was confirmed by using transformants of M. smegmatis (over-expressed in the regions of atpB, atpE, atpF, and atpH), which exhibited resistance in the presence of 109 for up to 0.4 µg/mL, and by measuring the ATP content of M. bovis BCG, which showed a reduction of ATP content (80% reduction) in the concentration of 0.1 µg/mL. Trichoderins (109111) not only showed activity against dormant mycobacteria but were found to inhibit ATP synthase, hence draining the ATP of non-replicating cells, a mechanism similar to the TB drug bedaquiline [80].
Two novel pyrrolidinone derivatives, zopfiellamides A (112) and B (113), were discovered from the facultative marine Zopfiella latipes, which was obtained from marine sediment in the Indian Ocean. They demonstrated antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with an MIC in the range of 2–10 µg/mL (4.35–22.44 µM), with 112 being five times more potent than 113 [81].
Table 2. Alkaloid and peptide NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
Table 2. Alkaloid and peptide NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
No.Metabolites [Novelties at the Time of Isolation]Producing StrainsMarine SourcesFermentation Media and MethodTested Against Mycobacterium Strain/Mycobacterial EnzymePotencyMechanism of ActionRef.
79arthpyrone F [N] aArthrinium sp. UJNMF008Marine sedimentSolid medium (80 g commercial rice, 0.4 g yeast extract, 0.4 g glucose, 120 mL water with 3% sea salt), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. smegmatisIC50 = 11.4 µMNR ***[61]
80arthpyrone G [N]NA **
81arthpyrone H [N]IC50 = 19.4 µM
82arthpyrone I [N]IC50 = 35.3 µM
83apiosporamide [K] bIC50 = 2.20 µM
84chaetoglobosin A [N]Aspergillus fumigatus AF3-093AMarine alga Fucus vesiculosusLiquid medium (malt extract broth 2%), agitated condition at 150 rpm, room temp., 14 daysM. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 47 µMNR[62]
85chaetoglobosin B [N]MIC = 95 µM
86sclerotiotide M [N]Aspergillus insulicola HDN151418Unidentified marine spongeLiquid medium (potato dextrose broth), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. phleiMIC = 3.13 µMNR[69]
87sclerotiotide N [N]MIC = 12.5 µM
88gliotoxin [K]Aspergillus sp. SCSIO Ind09F01Marine sedimentLiquid medium (mannitol 2%, maltose 2%, glucose 1%, corn steep liquor 0.1%, monosodium glutamate 1%, KH2PO4 0.05%, MgSO4.7H2O 0.03%, yeast extract 0.3%, sea salt 1.5%, pH 7.4), agitated condition at 172 rpm, 27 °C, 15 daysM. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = <0.03 µMNR[70]
8912,13-dihydroxy-fumitremorgin C [K]MIC = 2.41 µM
90asperversiamide A [N]Aspergillus versicolor CHNSCLM-0063Marine gorgonian coral Rumphella aggregateSolid medium (50 g rice, 50 mL sea water), static condition, room temp., 50 daysM. marinumMIC = 23.4 µMNR[71]
M. tuberculosisNA
91asperversiamide B [N]M. marinumMIC = 81.2 µM
M. tuberculosisMIC = 100 µM
92asperversiamide C [N]M. marinumMIC = 87.5 µM
M. tuberculosisNA
93brevianamide S [N]Aspergillus versicolor MF030Marine sedimentSolid medium (100 g rice, 3.25 g soya bean powder, 30 mL ASW * 3.5%), static condition, 28 °C, 19 daysM. bovis BCGMIC = 6.25 µg/mL (9.02 µM)NR[72]
94brevianamide T [N]MIC = 50 µg/mL (144.76 µM)
95brevianamide U [N]MIC = 25 µg/mL (65.54 µM)
96brevianamide V [N]MIC = 100 µg/mL (286.18 µM)
97brevianamide K [K]MIC = 50 µg/mL (143.92 µM)
98deoxybrevianamide E [K]MIC = 100 µg/mL (284.54 µM)
99fumitremorgin B [K]Aspergillus fumigatus MF071Marine sedimentSolid medium (160 g rice, 240 mL distilled water), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. smegmatisMIC = 100 µg/mL (208.52 µM)NR[73]
100fumiquinazoline J [K]MIC = 100 µg/mL (280.60µM)
1019-deacetylfumigaclavine C [K]MIC = 100 µg/mL (308.20 µM)
102diaporisoindole A [N]Diaporthe sp. SYSU-HQ3Branches of mangrove
Excoecaria agallocha
Solid medium (50 g rice, 50 mL saline water 0.3%), static condition, room temp., 28 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 4.2 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[74]
103diaporisoindole B [N]NA-
104fusaric acid [K]Fusarium sp. DZ-27Bark of Kandelia cande (L.)Liquid medium (glucose 1%, pepton 0.2 %, yeast extract 0.1%, NaCl 0.3%), static condition, 28 °C, 30 daysM. bovis BCGMIC = 1.8 µg/mL (10.04 µM)NR[75]
M. tuberculosis H37RvMIC = 1.8 µg/mL (10.04 µM)
Clinical multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (strain 18019, resistant to SM, INH, RF, and ETH)MIC = 30 µg/mL (167.40 µM)
Clinical multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (strain 17016, resistant to SM, INH, and ETH)MIC = 30 µg/mL (167.40 µM)
105talaramide A [N]Talaromyces sp. HZ-YX1Leaves of mangrove Kandelia obovataSolid medium (50 g rice, 1.5 g artificial sea salts, 50 mL distilled H2O), static condition, room temp., 28 daysMycobacterial Enzyme PknGIC50 = 55 µMInhibit virulence factor PknG[77]
106tolypocaibol A [N]Tolypocladium sp.Marine alga Spongomorpha arctaLiquid medium (potato dextrose broth 1.2%), agitated condition at 150 rpm, room temp., 14 daysM. smegmatis ATCC 70084MIC = 80 µMNR[78]
M. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 20µM
107tolypocaibol B [N]M. smegmatis ATCC 70084MIC = 80 µM
M. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 40 µM
108maximiscin [K]M. smegmatis ATCC 70084NA
M. tuberculosis H37RaMIC = 250 µM
109trichoderin A [N]Trichoderma sp.Unidentified marine spongeSolid medium (2.3 kg rice, 4.5 L ASW), static condition, 30 °C, 14 daysM. smegmatisMIC = 0.1 µg/mL (85.95 nM)Inhibit the mycobacterial F1F0-ATP–synthase[79]
M. bovis BCGMIC = 0.02 µg/mL (17.19 nM)
M. tuberculosisMIC = 0.12 µg/mL (103.14 nM)
110trichoderin A1 [N]M. smegmatisMIC = 1.56 µg/mL (1.36 µM)
M. bovis BCGMIC = 0.16 µg/mL (139.68 nM)
M. tuberculosisMIC = 2 µg/mL (1.75 µM)
111trichoderin B [N]M. smegmatisMIC = 0.63 µg/mL (548.06 nM)
M. bovis BCGMIC = 0.02 µg/mL (17.40 nM)
M. tuberculosisMIC = 0.13 µg/mL (113.09 nM)
112zopfiellamide A [N]Zopfiella latipesMarine sedimentLiquid medium (glucose 0.5%, yeast extract 0.1%, peptone from soybean 0.1%, pH 7) in fermentor with aeration rate 3 L/min, 120 rpm, 22 °C, 11 daysM. phleiMIC = 2–10 µg/mL (4.35–22.44 µM)NR[81]
113zopfiellamide B [N]MIC = 2–10 µg/mL (4.35–22.44 µM)
* ASW = artificial sea water; ** NA = not active; *** NR = mechanism of action not reported; a N = novel compound; b K = known compound.

2.5.3. Terpenoids and Steroids

Asperterpenoid A (114), a novel sesterterpenoid with a 5/7/(3)6/5 pentacyclic system (Figure 16), was isolated from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. 16-5c, which was obtained from the mangrove Sonneratia apetala collected from the South China Sea. This compound displayed a potent MptpB inhibitor with an IC50 of 2.2 µM [82]. In another study, Huang J H and colleagues uncovered a gene cluster comprised of three genes through genome exploration, which was demonstrated to be accountable for the synthesis of asperterpenoid A. The experimental reassembly in Aspergillus oryzae NSAR1 unveiled that the terpene synthase AstC functions akin to PvPS, producing preasperterpenoid A. Following this, the P450 AstB-mediated four-step oxidation reactions transformed preasperterpenoid A into the potent MptpB inhibitor 114, along with a minor byproduct, asperterpenoid B (115). The same study also showed that 114 and 115 acted as noncompetitive inhibitors against MptpB, with IC50 values of 3.34 and 5.67 µM, respectively, and Ki values of 2.12 and 2.20 µM, respectively [83]. Asperterpenoids A and B are rigid 5/7/(3)6/5 pentacyclic sesterterpenoids; each bears a carboxylic acid at C-19 and a β-hydroxyl group at C-21, the two polar handles most likely involved in binding to MptpB. Although no co-crystal or docking study is available, the acid/β-OH pair is reminiscent of the multidentate acidic motifs seen in other potent MptpB ligands, suggesting that it may interact with the Lys164/Arg166 oxyanion pocket and/or Asp165, while the bulky terpene cage could fill the hydrophobic groove defined by Phe161 and Tyr125. The modest loss of activity in B may arise from subtle conformational or electronic changes introduced by the epoxide rather than from the addition of a new carbonyl. Further structural data would be required to confirm this binding model [82].
A C-21 steroid, helvolic acid (116), was isolated from the marine-derived Aspergillus sp. SCSIO Ind09F01, along with 88 and 89. It exhibited potent antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, with an MIC50 of 0.894 µM [70].
A chemical investigation of marine-derived Aspergillus sp. DM2 ethyl acetate extract led to the discovery of two novel, natural Diels–Alder additive steroids, ergosterdiacids A (117) and B (118) (Figure 16), with a 6/6/6/6/5 pentacyclic system. An antimycobacterial assay against MptpB showed that 117 and 118 displayed moderate inhibition, with IC50 values of 15.1 and 30.1 µM, respectively. According to the docking results, 117 and 118, alongside oleanolic acid, bound within the active pocket of MptpB, were characterized by amino acid residues of Arg210, Arg63, Arg59, Met206, Phe161, Lle207, Lle203, Phe211, and Glu60. Notably, both compounds displayed interactions between their carboxyl groups and the alkaline amino acids (Arg59, Arg63, Arg210) within the binding pocket, which was reminiscent of (oxalylamino-methylene)–thiophene sulfonamide (OMTS), a potent MptpB inhibitor with an IC50 of 440 nM. Specifically, 117 formed four hydrogen bonds in its docking mode: two between the carbonyl carbon of C-3’ and the guanidyl of Arg 210 and Arg63 and two with Arg 63 and Arg59, while 118 exhibited a similar interaction pattern involving the carbonyl carbon of C-3’ and the guanidyl of Arg63 and Arg210. These hydrogen bonds played a pivotal role in stabilizing the protein–ligand complex. Furthermore, the predicted Ki values for 117 and 118 were 267.3 and 34.05 nM, respectively. An in-depth analysis of the structural characteristics of the isolated compounds and OMTS indicated that the carboxyl groups may serve as key functional groups contributing to the inhibitory effects against MptpB [16].
Rai and colleagues discovered 11 new ophiobolin-type sesterterpenoids from mangrove-associated Aspergillus sp. ZJ-68, in which five of them exhibited antimycobacterial properties, asperophiobolins B (119), D (120), E (121), H (122), and I (123), along with 12 known analogues, three of which, ophiobolin G (124), 21-deoxo-21-hydroxy-6-epi-ophiobolin G (125), and ophiobolin P (126) (Figure 16), also displayed antimycobacterial activity. The assay was conducted against MptpB and revealed that the IC50 values of those compounds were in the range of 19–42 µM [84]. Across this ophiobolin/asperophiobolin series, all molecules shared a cavernous 5-8-5 tricyclic cage and a long isoprenyl tail that could fill the hydrophobic Phe161-Leu199 tunnel of MptpB, but provided at most two donors, typically arranged as one dominant lactam/γ-lactone dyad to engage the Lys164/Arg166/Asp165 polar patch, giving uniform, mid-micromolar potencies (IC50 = 19–42 µM) [84].
A chemical investigation of an ethyl acetate extract of rice fermentation from the marine-derived Aspergillus sp. WHUF03110 led to the isolation of sartopyrone A (127). The fungal strain was obtained from the mangrove soil sediment from Yalong Bay, Sanya, Hainan, China. Compound 127 demonstrated moderate activity against M. smegmatis ATCC 607, with an MIC of 8 µg/mL (17.52 µM) [85].
A meroterpenoid, tenellone C (128), was also isolated from the fungus Diaporthe sp. SYSU-HQ3, along with 102 and 103. Compound 128 was found to be the precursor to 102 and 103, which could be produced after consecutive reactions of the reduction, nucleophilic addition, and dehydration of 128. Unlike 102, compound 128’s inhibiting property was shown to be a competitive inhibitor against MptpB, with an IC50 value of 5.2 µM. However, it had the same selectivity as 102 against MptpB over PtpB [74].
Macrophorin A (129), 4′-oxomacrophorin (130), and 7-deacetoxyyanuthone A (131) were isolated from an ethyl acetate extract of a rice medium of Gliomastix sp. obtained from the sponge Phakellia fusca Thiele collected in the Yongxing Island of Xisha. Those compounds displayed antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis with IC50 values of 22.1, 2.44, and 17.5 µM, respectively [86].
Table 3. Terpenoid and steroid NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
Table 3. Terpenoid and steroid NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
No.Metabolites [Novelties at the Time of Isolation]Producing StrainsMarine SourcesFermentation Media and MethodTested Against Mycobacterium Strain/Mycobacterial EnzymePotencyMechanism of ActionRef.
114asperterpenoid A [N] aAspergillus sp. 16-5cMangrove Sonneratia apetalaSolid medium (100 g rice, 20 mL 3% sea salt liquid), static condition, 25 °C, 28 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 3.34 µM
Ki = 2.12 µM
Inhibit virulence factor MptpB[82,83]
115asperterpenoid B [N]IC50 = 5.67 µM
Ki = 2.20 µM
116helvolic acid [K] bAspergillus sp. SCSIO Ind09F01Marine sedimentLiquid medium (mannitol 2%, maltose 2%, glucose 1%, corn steep liquor 0.1%, monosodium glutamate 1%, KH2PO4 0.05%, MgSO4.7H2O 0.03%, yeast extract 0.3%, sea salt 1.5%, pH 7.4), agitated condition at 172 rpm, 27 °C, 15 daysM. tuberculosis H37RaMIC50 = 0.894 µMNR *[70]
117ergosterdiacid A [N]Aspergillus sp. DM2Mangrove Aegiceras corniculatumSolid medium (50 g corn niblet, 0.86 g yeast extract, 2.37 g ammonium tartrate, 0.17 g MgSO4, 0.25 g KH2PO4, 0.4 g sea salt, 20 mL distilled water), static condition, 28 °C, 20 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 15.1 µM
Ki = 267.3 nM
Inhibit virulence factor MptpB[16]
118ergosterdiacid B [N]IC50 = 30.1 µM
Ki = 34.05 nM
119asperophiobolin B [N]Aspergillus sp. ZJ-68Leaves of mangrove Kandelia candelSolid medium (50 g rice, 50 mL 0.3% saline water), static condition, 25 °C, 28 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 39 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[84]
120asperophiobolin D [N]IC50 = 42 µM
121asperophiobolin E [N]IC50 = 28 µM
122asperophiobolin H [N]IC50 = 19 µM
123asperophiobolin I [N]IC50 = 35 µM
124ophiobolin G [K]IC50 = 24 µM
12521-deoxo-21-hydroxy-6-epi-ophiobolin G [K]IC50 = 37 µM
126ophiobolin P [K]IC50 = 36 µM
127sartopyrone A [K]Aspergillus sp. WHUF03110Marine sedimentSolid medium (200 g rice, 200 mL distilled water), static condition, 26 °C, 30 daysM. smegmatis ATCC 607MIC = 8 µg/mL (17.52 µM)NR[85]
128tenellone C [K]Diaporthe sp. SYSU-HQ3Branches of mangrove
Excoecaria agallocha
Solid medium (50 g rice, 50 mL saline water 0.3%), static condition, room temp., 28 daysMycobacterial Enzyme MptpBIC50 = 5.2 µMInhibit virulence factor MptpB[74]
129macrophorin A [K]Gliomastix sp.Marine sponge Phakellia fusca Solid medium (200 g rice, 2.5 g sea salt, 200 mL distilled water), static condition, 26 °C, 40 days M. tuberculosisIC50 = 22.1 µMNR[86]
1304′-oxomacrophorin [K]IC50 = 2.44 µM
1317-deacetoxyyanuthone A [K]IC50 = 17.5 µM
* NR = mechanism of action not reported; a N = novel compound; b K = known compound.

2.5.4. Other Compounds

One novel compound, gliomastin C (132), and four known hydroquinone derivatives, methylhydroquinone (133), acremonin A (134), prenylhydroquinone (135), and F-11334A1 (136) (Figure 17), were isolated from marine-derived Gliomastix sp. The fungus was obtained from the hard coral Stylophora sp. (from the Red Sea, Egypt). The compounds displayed antimycobacterial activity against the M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv with MICs of 12.5, 12.5, 25, 12.5, and 25 µM, respectively [87].
A novel halogenated metabolite, cryptophomic acid (137) (Figure 17), was discovered from marine-derived Phoma sp. 135, which was obtained from the sponge Ectyplasia perox, collected in Dominica, Lauro Club Reef. It exhibited moderate antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with an MIC of 16 µM [88].
Two alkyl aromatics, 1,3-dihydroxy-5-(12-hydroxyheptadecyl)benzene (138) and 1,3-dihydroxy-5-(12-sulfoxyheptadecyl)benzene (139), were isolated from Xylaria sp. HDN13-249, along with 77. The same study also revealed that the yields of those compounds were increased when Xylaria sp. HDN13-249 was co-cultivated with the deep-sea fungus Penicillium crustocum PRB-2. Compounds 138 and 139 showed antimycobacterial activity against M. phlei, with MICs of 25 and 12.5 µM, respectively [60].
Table 4. Other NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
Table 4. Other NPs with antimycobacterial activity from MF.
No.Metabolites [Novelties at the Time of Isolation]Producing StrainsMarine SourcesFermentation Media and MethodTested Against Mycobacterium Strain/Mycobacterial EnzymePotencyMechanism of ActionRef.
132gliomastin C [N] aGliomastix sp.Marine coral Stylophora sp.Solid medium (100 g rice, 110 mL water), static condition, 25 °C, 30 daysM. tuberculosis H37RvMIC = 12.5 µMNR *[87]
133methylhydroquinone [K] bMIC = 12.5 µM
134acremonin A [K]MIC = 25 µM
135prenylhydroquinone [K]MIC = 12.5 µM
136F-11334A1 [K]MIC = 25 µM
137cryptophomic acid [N]Phoma sp. 135Marine sponge Ectyplasia peroxSolid medium (biomalt agar medium 1.5%), static condition, room temp.M. phleiMIC = 16 µMNR[88]
1381,3-dihydroxy-5-(12-hydroxyheptadecyl)benzene [K]Xylaria sp. HDN13-249Root of mangrove Sonneratia caseolarisSolid medium (soluble starch 4%, yeast extract 0.1%, MgSO4 0.3%, monosodium glutamate 0.2%, sucrose 4%, KH2PO4 0.05%, maltose 3%, bean flour 0.05%, peptone 0.2%, agar powder 2.5%, seawater), 28 °C, 30 daysM. phleiMIC = 25 µMNR[60]
1391,3-dihydroxy-5-(12-sulfoxyheptadecyl)benzene [K]MIC = 12.5 µM
* NR = mechanism of action not reported; a N = novel compound; b K = known compound.

3. Perspectives and Outlooks

3.1. The Opportunity of Exploring Antimycobacterials from Marine-Derived Fungi

Most of the isolated fungi came from marine sediments, followed by mangrove, marine sponge, and marine algae, with a lesser amount isolated from marine corals, sea fan, ascidian, and marine anemone. This dominance could be attributed to the rich organic matter and unique ecological conditions in sediments, which provide a favorable environment for the growth and metabolic diversification of fungi [89,90]. Mangroves were characterized by their nutrient-rich, brackish waters, and hence can serve as fertile ground for diverse fungal communities [91,92,93]. From this review, it can be seen that marine sponges represent a crucial source of fungi capable of producing bioactive metabolites due to their symbiotic relationships with microorganisms [94].
In contrast, marine sources such as algae, corals, sea fans, ascidians, and marine anemones were not well explored in previous studies. This disparity likely reflects a combination of biological and methodological factors, such as their structural and ecological characteristics, or they might have been less extensively sampled in prior studies. While these sources contribute a smaller proportion of fungal isolates, they represent a largely untapped fungal genus that could yield novel compounds, such as compounds 3, 4, 3539, 4445, 77, 8485, 9092, 132, 106, and 107. This suggests that expanding sampling efforts in corals, sea fans, ascidians, and marine anemones could lead to the discovery of new fungal genera or metabolites.
Our review revealed that Aspergillus is the most prevalent species in both marine and terrestrial habitats and produced the most antimycobacterial metabolites, followed by Penicillium, making them the most promising sources for the investigation of bioactive metabolites, including potent and novel antimycobacterial agents (compounds 11, 13, 55, 56, 86, 114, and 115) [16,17,18,19]. However, some less-studied genera, such as Phoma, Pleosporales, Arthrinium, Coniothyrium, Talaromyces, Trichoderma, Tolycopladium, and Zopfiella, also hold great potential for yielding novel, potent antimycobacterial compounds. For example, Trichoderma sp. isolated from unidentified sponge produced novel compounds 109111 that exhibited activity against various Mycobacterium strains, not only against the active phenotype but also against the dormant one [79]. Arthrinium sp. UJNMF008 produced novel compounds 7982 and known compound 83 with potent activity against M. smegmatis [61]. Zopfiella latipes from marine sediments produced novel compounds 112113 with potent activity against M. phlei [81]. This suggests that exploring antimycobacterials from marine Aspergillus and Penicillium might be a promising approach due to their abundance in marine environments and ability to produce a variety of active metabolites, but with the possible disadvantage of there being a higher risk of rediscovering known metabolites, or worse, previously reported antimycobacterials. Nonetheless, their lesser discovery was not without reason: their abundance in the environment is, in fact, quite low. Therefore, when attempting to isolate fungi from marine sources, it is recommended to use a larger number of marine samples as one of the strategies to increase the likelihood of isolating fungi from specific genera [19].
Finding novel compounds is somewhat crucial in the fight against tuberculosis due to the increased number of drug-resistant strains. Novel compounds may offer alternative mechanisms of action that could potentially overcome existing drug resistance by offering new mechanisms of action. Additionally, novel drugs are hoped to reduce treatment duration and side effects, which could enhance patient compliance and treatment outcomes [95,96]. Since the rediscovery of known compounds remains a significant challenge in the journey of drug discovery from marine resources, integrating dereplication strategies early in the discovery process, such as advanced spectrometric methods, chemoinformatic tools, and genome mining approaches, might help identify previously unknown metabolites [97,98,99]. For example, the use of molecular networking through platforms like GNPS (Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking) can rapidly dereplicate known compounds, which can save time and resources [100,101]. In addition, combinatorial biosynthesis approaches that combine genetic elements from different fungal species could also diversify the metabolite pool and overcome the limitations of rediscovery [102,103]. Moreover, advances in fermentation optimization and bioprocess engineering, such as the use of co-cultivation strategies, can enhance the metabolic output of marine fungi [104,105].
The research of antituberculosis utilizes not only the M. tuberculosis strain but also non-tuberculosis strains such as M. smegmatis, M. bovis BCG, M. phlei, and M. marinum. The M. tuberculosis strain is a slow-organism and pathogenic organism; hence, research using M. tuberculosis must be done in a facility with high safety measures, such as biosafety level 3 (BSL 3), which is not easily available and accessible in most countries [106,107,108]. In addition, research using M. tuberculosis requires a long time for practical experiments [106,107,108]. Therefore, most researchers use alternative models with low pathogenicity and rapid growth to investigate antituberculosis activity, but still show comparable susceptibility to M. tuberculosis, especially in the screening phase. A study on M. tuberculosis genome analysis revealed that about 2800 of 4000 protein-coding genes have comparable equivalents in M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG, with >50% similarity in the amino acid composition, suggesting that M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG may show comparative susceptibility to M. tuberculosis and can be used as a model in the antituberculosis screening process [107]. A successful story of using a non-tuberculosis strain in antituberculosis discovery is the study of bedaquiline, a novel anti-TB drug that acts as a mycobacterial ATP synthase inhibitor that was initially investigated against M. smegmatis [109]. Also, the activity spectrum against various Mycobacterium strains, such as M. tuberculosis, M. smegmatis, and M. bovis BCG, highlights the utility of surrogate models in early-stage drug discovery. This is particularly relevant for initial screening due to the biosafety and logistical challenges associated with M. tuberculosis studies. However, before claiming to be antituberculosis to treat M. tuberculosis infection, any potential antimycobacterial hits or leads from screening using M. smegmatis or other non-tuberculosis strains must be investigated against M. tuberculosis strains eventually.
As described previously, the need to find sterilizing agents (anti-dormant) that are effective in eradicating tubercles in aerobic and dormant states to shorten the therapy remains critical in antituberculosis discovery [14,36,79,80]. Current TB therapies are time-consuming and ineffective against latent infections, often leading to relapse and contributing to the global disease burden [110,111,112,113]. This review revealed another critical gap in antituberculosis discovery, which is the limited focus on anti-dormancy activity. Dormant Mycobacterium populations are key contributors to prolonged tuberculosis therapy, as they exhibit a state of metabolic inactivity that can render them resistant to most conventional antibiotics targeting active bacterial processes [36,79,80]. We found that only 5 out of 131 MF antimycobacterials were tested against non-replicating or dormant phenotypes. This review showed the scarcity of exploring MF NPs and anti-dormancy. To our knowledge, in the last five years, only one study on anti-dormancy from marine-derived fungi has been reported, which is the activity of the ethyl-acetate extract of marine-derived Aspergillus ostianus and Aspergillus flavus fermentation products against hypoxic-induced dormant M. smegmatis [114]. These findings encourage the investigation of MF NPs (previously identified as active against replicating mycobacteria) for their efficacy against dormant Mycobacterium.

3.2. Mechanisms of Action of Antimycobacterials

Marine-derived fungi’s natural products target a remarkably broad spectrum of mycobacterial biochemical pathways, illustrating the power of diverse scaffolds to hit both classical and unconventional targets. A number of isolated metabolites disable mycobacterial virulence factors: for instance, polyketide-derived inhibitors of the secreted protein tyrosine phosphatases MptpB and MptpA can impair the pathogen’s ability to modulate host immune responses. For example, compounds 2527 exemplify this by potently inhibiting MptpB through a distinctive pharmacophore (a rigid 1,4-diketone core flanked by phenolic or β-hydroxy groups) that mimics the phosphate dianion and fits into the enzyme’s wide active site. Other metabolites act on entirely different targets. Compound 105, a unique alkaloid from Talaromyces, inhibits the eukaryotic-like serine/threonine kinase PknG, thereby potentially preventing M. tuberculosis from blocking phagosome–lysosome fusion. Likewise, Trichoderma-derived aminolipopeptides trichoderins A/A1 (109, 110) and B (111) bind the mycobacterial ATP synthase, collapsing ATP generation in non-replicating bacilli in a mechanism analogous to the TB drug bedaquiline. The anthraquinone emodin (17) and related planar polyketides offer yet another strategy by intercalating into guanine-rich DNA to stabilize G-quadruplex structures in vital genes (e.g., mosR and ndhA), thereby suppressing gene expression and slowing growth. This breadth of targets, from central metabolism to DNA topology and virulence signaling, highlights the unique therapeutic promise of marine fungal metabolites in tackling TB from multiple angles. An illustration of the mechanism of action is shown in Figure 18.

3.3. Challenges Posed by Mycotoxins

One of the main challenges with drug exploration from fungi, including in marine and terrestrial environments, is their frequent co-classification as mycotoxins or potent cytotoxins. Some of the compounds reported in this article, including those with potent antimycobacterial activity, were reported as mycotoxins and posed significant toxicities to mammals.
Gliotoxin (88) was found to provoke pronounced immunosuppression and lymphocyte apoptosis in mammals, illustrating how potent antimycobacterial efficacy can coexist with unacceptable host toxicity [115]. Secalonic acid D (34), while active against M. tuberculosis, is simultaneously a teratogenic mycotoxin that induces fetal malformations in rodent models [116]. Helvolic acid (116) exerts broad cytotoxic effects on human cancer cell lines and shows limited tolerability in murine in vivo studies [117]. Viomellein (28) was reported as a nephrotoxic historically linked to animal mycotoxicoses in contaminated grain, and its structural congener, xanthomegnin (29), is both nephrotoxic and mutagenic [118,119]. Tremorgenic indole-diterpenes such as fumitremorgin B (99) were found to trigger sustained convulsions, DNA damage in human lymphocytes, and even lethality in mice [120]. Actin-binding cytochalasins including chaetoglobosins A (84) and B (85) disrupt microfilament polymerization and exhibit potent cytotoxicity toward mammalian cells [121]. Other compounds such as 18, 104, 119, and 124 were found to exhibit cytotoxicity against human cells, neurotoxicity, and immunotoxicity [115,117,122].
Many of the most potent antimycobacterial metabolites isolated from marine fungi carry well-documented liabilities that range from immunosuppression and teratogenicity to nephro- and neurotoxicity in mammalian systems. Their shared propensity for off-target damage suggests a fundamental paradox of fungal natural-product discovery in which structural motifs that confer high antimycobacterial potency often coincide with chemical features that drive host toxicity. Therefore, recognizing these dualities is critical, as it informs the decision of whether a scaffold should be deprioritized, re-engineered, or delivered in a way that limits systemic exposure.

3.4. Anticipating and Mitigating Toxicity in Marine-Derived Fungal Antimycobacterial Discovery

Marine-derived fungi metabolites provide a rich but risk-laden reservoir for antimycobacterial lead discovery. Because many potent hits harbor mycotoxin-associated toxicophores, an effective discovery pipeline must anticipate liabilities as early as dereplication and then deploy a suite of chemical, biosynthetic, pharmacological, and formulation-based tactics to widen the therapeutic window.
High-resolution LC-MS/MS datasets of an extract can be visualized in GNPS molecular networks or matched in silico to curate the fungal metabolites, hence allowing for the rapid flagging of hazardous chemotypes such as mycotoxins before laborious purification begins [123]. This strategy is also useful as a dereplication tool to avoid re-isolating known fungal metabolites or compounds with previously reported bioactivities [124]. Hence, by overlaying feature-based molecular networking (FBMN) with the public GNPS spectral libraries and in-house mycotoxin databases, investigators can rank network nodes by novelty scores, triage sub-clusters that match hazardous scaffolds, and channel purification resources toward molecular families lacking confident annotations [125]. The FBMN workflow also incorporates quantitative ion-intensity data, enabling the early estimation of compound abundance and signaling when a low-level but novel node may not justify extensive scale-up [125]. Complementary mass-defect filtering and mass-shift searches further sharpen dereplication by excluding spectra that fall within characteristic mass windows of regulated mycotoxins [126,127].
Targeted delivery and formulation-based dose-sparing also offer a complementary route to toxicity mitigation by physically shielding reactive fungal metabolites from off-target tissues and restricting drug exposure to the primary site of infection. Liposomal encapsulation is a clinically validated paradigm that is best exemplified by liposomal amphotericin B, whose reformulation can cut nephro- and infusion-related toxicity relative to the parent macrolide while preserving antifungal potency [128,129]. Similar nanocarrier principles are now being translated to tuberculosis, such as polymeric, lipid, and PLGA nanoparticles that consistently lower the effective doses of rifampicin, isoniazid, and bedaquiline in animal models, thereby reducing systemic adverse effects without compromising bactericidal activity [130,131]. Proof-of-concept for mycotoxins has emerged with magnetic nanoparticle conjugates of gliotoxin, which showed attenuated cytotoxicity in mammalian cells yet retained intracellular antimicrobial activity, demonstrating that nano-shielding can tame even highly reactive species [132,133]. Hence, by applying these orthogonal yet synergistic approaches, researchers can systematically convert hazardous marine-fungal mycotoxins into selective and clinically relevant antitubercular leads.

4. Conclusions

Marine-derived fungi (MF) are potential sources of natural products (NPs) with antimycobacterial activity, contributing to a diverse array of metabolites classified into polyketides, alkaloids, peptides, terpenoids, and miscellaneous compounds. Of the 139 identified metabolites, 131 exhibited antimycobacterial activity, with 25 compounds demonstrating strong activity and 50% classified as novel compounds. Aspergillus remains the most dominant and productive genus for antimycobacterial compound; however, the utilization of dereplication strategies is necessary to prevent the rediscovery of known antimycobacterials from Aspergillus. In addition, focusing on underexplored fungal genera such as Arthrinium, Coniothyrium, Zopfiella, Trichoderma, and Tolypocladium and targeting marine sources like mangroves, marine sediments, sponges, and algae offer promising avenues for MF antimycobacterial compounds. Nonetheless, the less extensive studies on algae, corals, sea fans, ascidians, and marine anemones suggest that these sources might be a promising source for obtaining novel and unique fungal genera capable of producing bioactive compounds with antimycobacterial activity. Recurrent structural motifs can be discerned, pointing to privileged scaffolds for antimycobacterial activity. For example, several conjugated polyketide frameworks (featuring α,β-unsaturated carbonyls adjacent to hydroxyls) consistently appear in potent isolates, as do planar polyphenolic scaffolds capable of multivalent interactions (e.g., the tri-phenolate arrangement in pyrogallol ethers) and lipophilic cyclic peptides with amphipathic profiles. These pharmacophores underpin interactions with diverse targets, from enzyme active sites to bacterial membranes and DNA, and thus represent valuable starting points for medicinal chemistry optimization. Our SAR analysis across different compound series highlights that even subtle modifications (e.g., the stereochemistry of a double bond or the presence of a specific functional group) can dramatically influence antimycobacterial potency, offering clues for designing analogues with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity. We showed that marine fungal metabolites can inhibit targets and pathways not addressed by current TB drugs, such as virulence factors like MptpB, MptpA, and PknG, and essential bacterial machinery like ATP synthase and DNA topology, thereby opening avenues to overcome existing drug resistance. Compounds acting on such novel targets could retain activity against drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains and even bypass common resistance mechanisms, since their modes of action differ fundamentally from those of first-line agents. Only a small fraction of MF antimycobacterial has been investigated against the dormant phenotype, highlighting a critical gap in current research. These findings underscore the potential of MF as a valuable resource for TB drug discovery, including in addressing drug resistance and dormancy-related challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari), N.M. and E.J.; investigation, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari), M.S., M.A. (Masayoshi Arai) and E.J.; resources, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari) and N.M.; data curation, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari) and N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari) and N.M.; writing—review and editing, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari), N.M. and M.S.; visualization, M.A. (Muhammad Azhari) and E.J.; supervision, M.S., M.A. (Masayoshi Arai) and E.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Elin Julianti thanks the ITB Research, Community Service and Innovation Program (PPMI) 2022 (no. 16A/IT1.C10/SK-KP/2022); Fundamental Research 2023, The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia (no. 110/E5/PG.02.00.PL/2023); and the ITB Research Program 2024 (no. 1250/IT1.C10/TA/2024) for supporting the research on bioactive compounds from marine-derived fungi in the Laboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocess, School of Pharmacy, ITB.

Acknowledgments

Muhammad Azhari acknowledges the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education Agency (LPDP) (no. 202207213210477) for supporting his PhD study for which this article was written. Muhammad Azhari and Elin Julianti also thank the Nishimura International Scholarship Foundation (NISF) for supporting the antituberculosis and anticancer research training at Osaka University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Barberis, I.; Bragazzi, N.L.; Galluzzo, L.; Martini, M. The History of Tuberculosis: From the First Historical Records to the Isolation of Koch’s Bacillus. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2017, 58, E9. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  3. Lai, P.-C.; Low, C.-T.; Tse, W.-S.C.; Tsui, C.-K.; Lee, H.; Hui, P.-K. Risk of Tuberculosis in High-Rise and High Density Dwellings: An Exploratory Spatial Analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 183, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hunter, R.L. The Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis: The Early Infiltrate of Post-Primary (Adult Pulmonary) Tuberculosis: A Distinct Disease Entity. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rahlwes, K.C.; Dias, B.R.S.; Campos, P.C.; Alvarez-Arguedas, S.; Shiloh, M.U. Pathogenicity and Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Virulence 2023, 14, 2150449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Smith, I. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Pathogenesis and Molecular Determinants of Virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 463–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sigwart, J.D.; Blasiak, R.; Jaspars, M.; Jouffray, J.-B.; Tasdemir, D. Unlocking the Potential of Marine Biodiscovery. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carroll, A.R.; Copp, B.R.; Davis, R.A.; Keyzers, R.A.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 362–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cox, R.J.; Skellam, E.; Williams, K. Biosynthesis of Fungal Polyketides. In Physiology and Genetics; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 385–412. [Google Scholar]
  10. Harwani, D.; Barupal, S.; Begani, J.; Lakhani, J. Genetic Diversity of Polyketide Synthases and Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases in Fungi. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodrigues, A.G. Secondary Metabolism and Antimicrobial Metabolites of Aspergillus. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 81–93. [Google Scholar]
  12. Connolly, L.E.; Edelstein, P.H.; Ramakrishnan, L. Why Is Long-Term Therapy Required to Cure Tuberculosis? PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sholeye, A.R.; Williams, A.A.; Loots, D.T.; Tutu van Furth, A.M.; van der Kuip, M.; Mason, S. Tuberculous Granuloma: Emerging Insights From Proteomics and Metabolomics. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 804838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arai, M.; Kamiya, K.; Pruksakorn, P.; Sumii, Y.; Kotoku, N.; Joubert, J.-P.; Moodley, P.; Han, C.; Shin, D.; Kobayashi, M. Anti-Dormant Mycobacterial Activity and Target Analysis of Nybomycin Produced by a Marine-Derived Streptomyces Sp. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 3534–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vilchèze, C. Mycobacterial Cell Wall: A Source of Successful Targets for Old and New Drugs. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Z.; Dong, Z.; Qiu, P.; Wang, Q.; Yan, J.; Lu, Y.; Wasu, P.; Hong, K.; She, Z. Two New Bioactive Steroids from a Mangrove-Derived Fungus Aspergillus Sp. Steroids 2018, 140, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, J.W.; Lee, W.; Perera, R.H.; Lim, Y.W. Long-Term Investigation of Marine-Derived Aspergillus Diversity in the Republic of Korea. Mycobiology 2023, 51, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gonçalves, M.F.M.; Esteves, A.C.; Alves, A. Marine Fungi: Opportunities and Challenges. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 559–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Imhoff, J. Natural Products from Marine Fungi—Still an Underrepresented Resource. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cos, P.; Vlietinck, A.J.; Berghe, D.V.; Maes, L. Anti-Infective Potential of Natural Products: How to Develop a Stronger In Vitro ‘Proof-of-Concept’. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 106, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xia, G.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Long, Y.; Lin, S.; Lu, Y.; He, L.; Lin, Y.; Liu, L.; She, Z. Alterporriol-Type Dimers from the Mangrove Endophytic Fungus, Alternaria Sp. (SK11), and Their MptpB Inhibitions. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2953–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fan, L.; Wu, X.; Jin, C.; Li, F.; Xiong, S.; Dong, Y. MptpB Promotes Mycobacteria Survival by Inhibiting the Expression of Inflammatory Mediators and Cell Apoptosis in Macrophages. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vickers, C.F.; Silva, A.P.G.; Chakraborty, A.; Fernandez, P.; Kurepina, N.; Saville, C.; Naranjo, Y.; Pons, M.; Schnettger, L.S.; Gutierrez, M.G.; et al. Structure-Based Design of MptpB Inhibitors That Reduce Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Survival and Infection Burden in Vivo. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 8337–8352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Seibert, S.F.; Eguereva, E.; Krick, A.; Kehraus, S.; Voloshina, E.; Raabe, G.; Fleischhauer, J.; Leistner, E.; Wiese, M.; Prinz, H.; et al. Polyketides from the Marine-Derived Fungus Ascochyta Salicorniae and Their Potential to Inhibit Protein Phosphatases. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2233–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, B.; He, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Franzblau, S.G.; Yang, Z.; Chan, R.J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Targeting Mycobacterium Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase B for Antituberculosis Agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4573–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Ling, S.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, W. Isolation, Structure Elucidation, and Antimycobacterial Properties of Dimeric Naphtho-γ-pyrones from the Marine-Derived Fungus Aspergillus carbonarius. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Li, S.; Cui, H.; Sun, Z.; Chen, D.; Lu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W. Polypropionate Derivatives with Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase B Inhibitory Activities from the Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Aspergillus Fischeri FS452. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 3440–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Song, Z.; Liu, Y.; Gao, J.; Hu, J.; He, H.; Dai, S.; Wang, L.; Dai, H.; Zhang, L.; Song, F. Antitubercular Metabolites from the Marine-Derived Fungus Strain Aspergillus Fumigatus MF029. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 2647–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dey, A.; Anand, K.; Singh, A.; Prasad, R.; Barthwal, R. Binding-Induced Thermal Stabilization of MosR and NdhA G-Quadruplex Comprising Genes by Emodin Leads to Downregulation and Growth Inhibition in Mtb: Potential as Anti-Tuberculosis Drug. Results Chem. 2023, 6, 101114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, G.; Wu, G.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, X.; Che, Q.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Li, D.; Zhang, G. Cytotoxic Tetrahydroxanthone Dimers from the Mangrove-Associated Fungus Aspergillus Versicolor HDN1009. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, L.; Ren, L.; Li, S.; Song, J.; Han, Z.; He, S.; Xu, S. Production of New Antibacterial 4-Hydroxy-α-Pyrones by a Marine Fungus Aspergillus Niger. Cultivated in Solid Medium. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, G.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Che, Q.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Prenylated p -Terphenyls from a Mangrove Endophytic Fungus, Aspergillus Candidus LDJ-5. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xiao, Z.; Lin, S.; Tan, C.; Lu, Y.; He, L.; Huang, X.; She, Z. Asperlones A and B, Dinaphthalenone Derivatives from a Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus Sp. 16-5C. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beresford, N.; Patel, S.; Armstrong, J.; Szöor, B.; Fordham-Skelton, A.P.; Tabernero, L. MptpB, a Virulence Factor from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, Exhibits Triple-Specificity Phosphatase Activity. Biochem. J. 2007, 406, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mascarello, A.; Mori, M.; Chiaradia-Delatorre, L.D.; Menegatti, A.C.O.; Monache, F.D.; Ferrari, F.; Yunes, R.A.; Nunes, R.J.; Terenzi, H.; Botta, B.; et al. Discovery of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase B (PtpB) Inhibitors from Natural Products. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kamiya, K.; Arai, M.; Setiawan, A.; Kobayashi, M. Anti-Dormant Mycobacterial Activity of Viomellein and Xanthomegnin, Naphthoquinone Dimers Produced by Marine-Derived Aspergillus Sp. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 1934578X1701200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gupta, V.K.; Kumar, M.M.; Singh, D.; Bisht, D.; Sharma, S. Drug Targets in Dormant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Can the Conquest Against Tuberculosis Become a Reality? Infect. Dis. 2018, 50, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kovermann, M.; Stefan, A.; Palazzetti, C.; Immler, F.; Dal Piaz, F.; Bernardi, L.; Cimone, V.; Bellone, M.L.; Hochkoeppler, A. The Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase MptpA Features a PH Dependent Activity Overlapping the Bacterium Sensitivity to Acidic Conditions. Biochimie 2023, 213, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, X.; Song, F.; Ma, L.; Chen, C.; Xiao, X.; Ren, B.; Liu, X.; Dai, H.; Piggott, A.M.; Av-Gay, Y.; et al. Sydowiols A–C: Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Inhibitors from an East China Sea Marine-Derived Fungus, Aspergillus sydowii. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 6081–6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stehle, T.; Sreeramulu, S.; Löhr, F.; Richter, C.; Saxena, K.; Jonker, H.R.A.; Schwalbe, H. The Apo-Structure of the Low Molecular Weight Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatase A (MptpA) from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Allows for Better Target-Specific Drug Development. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 34569–34582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, X.-W.; Lin, Y.; Lu, Y.-J.; Zhou, X.-F.; Liu, Y.-H. Peptides and Polyketides Isolated from the Marine Sponge-Derived Fungus Aspergillus Terreus SCSIO 41008. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2019, 17, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.; Lin, X.-P.; Ju, Z.-R.; Liao, X.-J.; Huang, X.-J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, B.-X.; Xu, S.-H. Aspergchromones A and B, Two New Polyketides from the Marine Sponge-Associated Fungus Aspergillus Sp. SCSIO XWS03F03. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 19, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Elsebai, M.F.; Kehraus, S.; Lindequist, U.; Sasse, F.; Shaaban, S.; Gütschow, M.; Josten, M.; Sahl, H.-G.; König, G.M. Antimicrobial Phenalenone Derivatives from the Marine-Derived Fungus Coniothyrium cereale. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Elsebai, M.F.; Natesan, L.; Kehraus, S.; Mohamed, I.E.; Schnakenburg, G.; Sasse, F.; Shaaban, S.; Gütschow, M.; König, G.M. HLE-Inhibitory Alkaloids with a Polyketide Skeleton from the Marine-Derived Fungus Coniothyrium cereale. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 2282–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grundner, C.; Perrin, D.; Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R.; Swinnen, D.; Gonzalez, J.; Gee, C.L.; Wells, T.N.; Alber, T. Structural Basis for Selective Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase PtpB. Structure 2007, 15, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, D.; Liu, L.; Lu, Y.; Chen, S. Identification of Fusarielin M as a Novel Inhibitor of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase B (MptpB). Bioorg Chem. 2021, 106, 104495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Trisuwan, K.; Khamthong, N.; Rukachaisirikul, V.; Phongpaichit, S.; Preedanon, S.; Sakayaroj, J. Anthraquinone, Cyclopentanone, and Naphthoquinone Derivatives from the Sea Fan-Derived Fungi Fusarium Spp. PSU-F14 and PSU-F135. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1507–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, X.; Ma, X.; Xie, Y.; Cai, S.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Aromatic Polyketides from a Sponge-Derived Fungus Metarhizium Anisopliae Mxh-99 and Their Antitubercular Activities. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2013, 36, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Zhong, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Kang, J.; et al. Anti-Mycobacterial Activity of Marine Fungus-Derived 4-Deoxybostrycin and Nigrosporin. Molecules 2013, 18, 1728–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sabdaningsih, A.; Liu, Y.; Mettal, U.; Heep, J.; Riyanti; Wang, L.; Cristianawati, O.; Nuryadi, H.; Triandala Sibero, M.; Marner, M.; et al. A New Citrinin Derivative from the Indonesian Marine Sponge-Associated Fungus Penicillium Citrinum. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Z.; Lin, S.; Xia, G.; Xia, X.; Ding, B.; He, L.; Lu, Y.; She, Z. Peniphenones A–D from the Mangrove Fungus Penicillium Dipodomyicola HN4-3A as Inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Phosphatase MptpB. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shah, M.; Sun, C.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, G.; Che, Q.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Li, D. Antibacterial Polyketides from Antarctica Sponge-Derived Fungus Penicillium Sp. HDN151272. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, F.; Li, X.; Yu, J.-H.; Zhang, X.; Nong, X.; Chen, G.; Zhu, K.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Bao, J.; Zhang, H. Secondary Metabolites from the Mangrove Sediment-Derived Fungus Penicillium Pinophilum SCAU037. Fitoterapia 2019, 136, 104177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Morehouse, N.J.; Flewelling, A.J.; Johnson, J.A.; Gray, C.A. Halogenated Bianthrones from Penicillium Roseopurpureum: A Fungal Endophyte of the Marine Alga Petalonia fascia. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X2090140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Han, Y.; Sun, C.; Li, C.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, T.; Li, D.; Che, Q. Antibacterial Phenalenone Derivatives from Marine-Derived Fungus Pleosporales Sp. HDN1811400. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021, 68, 152938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ge, X.; Sun, C.; Feng, Y.; Wang, L.; Peng, J.; Che, Q.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Li, D.; Zhang, G. Anthraquinone Derivatives from a Marine-Derived Fungus Sporendonema Casei HDN16-802. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chokpaiboon, S.; Unagul, P.; Nithithanasilp, S.; Komwijit, S.; Somyong, W.; Ratiarpakul, T.; Isaka, M.; Bunyapaiboonsri, T. Salicylaldehyde and Dihydroisobenzofuran Derivatives from the Marine Fungus Zopfiella marina. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bunyapaiboonsri, T.; Yoiprommarat, S.; Nopgason, R.; Intereya, K.; Suvannakad, R.; Sakayaroj, J. Palmarumycins from the Mangrove Fungus BCC 25093. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 5572–5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lin, Z.; Koch, M.; Abdel Aziz, M.H.; Galindo-Murillo, R.; Tianero, M.D.; Cheatham, T.E.; Barrows, L.R.; Reilly, C.A.; Schmidt, E.W. Oxazinin A, a Pseudodimeric Natural Product of Mixed Biosynthetic Origin from a Filamentous Fungus. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4774–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, G.; Sun, Z.; Peng, J.; Zhu, M.; Che, Q.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Secondary Metabolites Produced by Combined Culture of Penicillium crustosum and a Xylaria Sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 2013–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bao, J.; Zhai, H.; Zhu, K.; Yu, J.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, C.-S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Bioactive Pyridone Alkaloids from a Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Arthrinium Sp. UJNMF0008. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Flewelling, A.J.; Bishop, A.L.; Johnson, J.A.; Gray, C.A. Polyketides from an Endophytic Aspergillus Fumigatus Isolate Inhibit the Growth of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and MRSA. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1934578X1501001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zheng, J.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Hong, K.; Liu, P.; Zhu, W. Cyclic Tripeptides from the Halotolerant Fungus Aspergillus Sclerotiorum PT06-1. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vellé, A.; Cebollada, A.; Macías, R.; Iglesias, M.; Gil-Moles, M.; Sanz Miguel, P.J. From Imidazole toward Imidazolium Salts and N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: Electronic and Geometrical Redistribution. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, Y.; Liao, H.; Liu, L.-Y.; Sun, F.; Chen, H.-F.; Jiao, W.-H.; Zhu, H.-R.; Yang, F.; Huang, G.; Zeng, D.-Q.; et al. Phakefustatins A–C: Kynurenine-Bearing Cycloheptapeptides as RXRα Modulators from the Marine Sponge Phakellia fusca. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 6703–6708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xu, W.-J.; Liao, X.-J.; Xu, S.-H.; Diao, J.-Z.; Du, B.; Zhou, X.-L.; Pan, S.-S. Isolation, Structure Determination, and Synthesis of Galaxamide, A Rare Cytotoxic Cyclic Pentapeptide from a Marine Algae Galaxaura filamentosa. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4569–4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Teta, R.; Marteinsson, V.T.; Longeon, A.; Klonowski, A.M.; Groben, R.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Costantino, V.; Mangoni, A. Thermoactinoamide A, an Antibiotic Lipophilic Cyclopeptide from the Icelandic Thermophilic Bacterium Thermoactinomyces vulgaris. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 2530–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M.R. New Colorimetric Cytotoxicity Assay for Anticancer-Drug Screening. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, C.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, Z.; Yu, L.; Zhou, H.; Han, Y.; Shah, M.; Che, Q.; Zhang, G.; Li, D.; et al. Antibacterial Cyclic Tripeptides from Antarctica-Sponge-Derived Fungus Aspergillus Insulicola HDN151418. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Luo, X.; Zhou, X.; Lin, X.; Qin, X.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Tu, Z.; Yang, B.; Liao, S.; Tian, Y.; et al. Antituberculosis Compounds from a Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Aspergillus Sp. SCSIO Ind09F01. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 1958–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Hou, X.-M.; Liang, T.-M.; Guo, Z.-Y.; Wang, C.-Y.; Shao, C.-L. Discovery, Absolute Assignments, and Total Synthesis of Asperversiamides A–C and Their Potent Activity Against Mycobacterium marinum. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1104–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Song, F.; Liu, X.; Guo, H.; Ren, B.; Chen, C.; Piggott, A.M.; Yu, K.; Gao, H.; Wang, Q.; Liu, M.; et al. Brevianamides with Antitubercular Potential from a Marine-Derived Isolate of Aspergillus versicolor. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4770–4773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Han, J.; Liu, M.; Jenkins, I.D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Quinn, R.J.; Feng, Y. Genome-Inspired Chemical Exploration of Marine Fungus Aspergillus Fumigatus MF071. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cui, H.; Lin, Y.; Luo, M.; Lu, Y.; Huang, X.; She, Z. Diaporisoindoles A–C: Three Isoprenylisoindole Alkaloid Derivatives from the Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Diaporthe Sp. SYSU-HQ3. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5621–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pan, J.-H.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.-H.; Tao, Y.-W.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Peng, Y.; Dong, T.; Lai, X.-M.; Lin, Y.-C. Antimycobacterial Activity of Fusaric Acid From a Mangrove Endophyte and Its Metal Complexes. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2011, 34, 1177–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Khan, M.Z.; Bhaskar, A.; Upadhyay, S.; Kumari, P.; Rajmani, R.S.; Jain, P.; Singh, A.; Kumar, D.; Bhavesh, N.S.; Nandicoori, V.K. Protein Kinase G Confers Survival Advantage to Mycobacterium Tuberculosis during Latency-Like Conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 16093–16108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, S.; He, L.; Chen, D.; Cai, R.; Long, Y.; Lu, Y.; She, Z. Talaramide A, an Unusual Alkaloid From The Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Talaromyces Sp. (HZ-YX1) as an Inhibitor of Mycobacterial PknG. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 4273–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Morehouse, N.J.; Flewelling, A.J.; Liu, D.Y.; Cavanagh, H.; Linington, R.G.; Johnson, J.A.; Gray, C.A. Tolypocaibols: Antibacterial Lipopeptaibols from a Tolypocladium Sp. Endophyte of the Marine Macroalga Spongomorpha arcta. J. Nat. Prod. 2023, 86, 1529–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Pruksakorn, P.; Arai, M.; Kotoku, N.; Vilchèze, C.; Baughn, A.D.; Moodley, P.; Jacobs, W.R.; Kobayashi, M. Trichoderins, Novel Aminolipopeptides from a Marine Sponge-Derived Trichoderma Sp., Are Active Against Dormant Mycobacteria. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3658–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pruksakorn, P.; Arai, M.; Liu, L.; Moodley, P.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr.; Kobayashi, M. Action-Mechanism of Trichoderin A, an Anti-Dormant Mycobacterial Aminolipopeptide from Marine Sponge-Derived Trichoderma Sp. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 34, 1287–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Daferner, M.; Anke, T.; Sterner, O. Zopfiellamides A and B, Antimicrobial Pyrrolidinone Derivatives from the Marine Fungus Zopfiella latipes. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7781–7784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Huang, X.; Huang, H.; Li, H.; Sun, X.; Huang, H.; Lu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Long, Y.; She, Z. Asperterpenoid A, a New Sesterterpenoid as an Inhibitor of Mycobacterium Tuberculosi s Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase B from the Culture of Aspergillus Sp. 16-5c. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 721–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Huang, J.-H.; Lv, J.-M.; Wang, Q.-Z.; Zou, J.; Lu, Y.-J.; Wang, Q.-L.; Chen, D.-N.; Yao, X.-S.; Gao, H.; Hu, D. Biosynthesis of an Anti-Tuberculosis Sesterterpenoid Asperterpenoid A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cai, R.; Jiang, H.; Mo, Y.; Guo, H.; Li, C.; Long, Y.; Zang, Z.; She, Z. Ophiobolin-Type Sesterterpenoids from the Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus Sp. ZJ-68. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 2268–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lv, H.; Wang, K.; Xue, Y.; Chen, J.; Su, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Jia, J.; Bi, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Three New Metabolites From the Marine-Derived Fungus Aspergillus Sp. WHUF03110. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2021, 16, 1934578X2110550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. He, W.-J.; Zhou, X.-J.; Qin, X.-C.; Mai, Y.-X.; Lin, X.-P.; Liao, S.-R.; Yang, B.; Zhang, T.; Tu, Z.-C.; Wang, J.-F.; et al. Quinone/Hydroquinone Meroterpenoids with Antitubercular and Cytotoxic Activities Produced by the Sponge-Derived Fungus Gliomastix Sp. ZSDS1-F7. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Elnaggar, M.S.; Ebrahim, W.; Mándi, A.; Kurtán, T.; Müller, W.E.G.; Kalscheuer, R.; Singab, A.; Lin, W.; Liu, Z.; Proksch, P. Hydroquinone Derivatives from the Marine-Derived Fungus Gliomastix Sp. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 30640–30649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Elsebai, M.F.; Ghabbour, H.A.; Legrave, N.; Fontaine-Vive, F.; Mehiri, M. New Bioactive Chlorinated Cyclopentene Derivatives from the Marine-Derived Fungus Phoma Sp. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 1885–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Amend, A.; Burgaud, G.; Cunliffe, M.; Edgcomb, V.P.; Ettinger, C.L.; Gutiérrez, M.H.; Heitman, J.; Hom, E.F.Y.; Ianiri, G.; Jones, A.C.; et al. Fungi in the Marine Environment: Open Questions and Unsolved Problems. mBio 2019, 10, 01189-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sen, K.; Sen, B.; Wang, G. Diversity, Abundance, and Ecological Roles of Planktonic Fungi in Marine Environments. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Akram, H.; Hussain, S.; Mazumdar, P.; Chua, K.O.; Butt, T.E.; Harikrishna, J.A. Mangrove Health: A Review of Functions, Threats, and Challenges Associated with Mangrove Management Practices. Forests 2023, 14, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Augusthy, S.; Nizam, A.; Kumar, A. The Diversity, Drivers, Consequences and Management of Plant Invasions in the Mangrove Ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 945, 173851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Thatoi, H.; Behera, B.C.; Mishra, R.R. Ecological Role and Biotechnological Potential of Mangrove Fungi: A Review. Mycology 2013, 4, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kushveer, J.S.; Rashmi, M.; Sarma, V.V. Bioactive Compounds from Marine-Derived Fungi and Their Potential Applications. In Fungi Bio-Prospects in Sustainable Agriculture, Environment and Nano-Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 91–173. [Google Scholar]
  95. Lienhardt, C.; Raviglione, M.; Spigelman, M.; Hafner, R.; Jaramillo, E.; Hoelscher, M.; Zumla, A.; Gheuens, J. New Drugs for the Treatment of Tuberculosis: Needs, Challenges, Promise, and Prospects for the Future. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 205, S241–S249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Motta, I.; Boeree, M.; Chesov, D.; Dheda, K.; Günther, G.; Horsburgh, C.R.; Kherabi, Y.; Lange, C.; Lienhardt, C.; McIlleron, H.M.; et al. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Tuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2024, 30, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Albarano, L.; Esposito, R.; Ruocco, N.; Costantini, M. Genome Mining as New Challenge in Natural Products Discovery. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Gaudêncio, S.P.; Pereira, F. Dereplication: Racing to Speed up the Natural Products Discovery Process. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 779–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tawfike, A.F.; Viegelmann, C.; Edrada-Ebel, R. Metabolomics and Dereplication Strategies in Natural Products. In Metabolomics Tools for Natural Product Discovery: Methods and Protocols; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 227–244. [Google Scholar]
  100. Qin, G.-F.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, F.; Huo, Z.-Q.; Yao, Q.-Q.; Feng, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.-M.; Yao, J.-C.; Liang, H.-B. MS/MS-Based Molecular Networking: An Efficient Approach for Natural Products Dereplication. Molecules 2022, 28, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wang, M.; Carver, J.J.; Phelan, V.V.; Sanchez, L.M.; Garg, N.; Peng, Y.; Nguyen, D.D.; Watrous, J.; Kapono, C.A.; Luzzatto-Knaan, T.; et al. Sharing and Community Curation of Mass Spectrometry Data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jiang, C.; Lv, G.; Tu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Duan, Y.; Zeng, B.; He, B. Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in the Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites in Filamentous Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Skellam, E.; Rajendran, S.; Li, L. Combinatorial Biosynthesis for the Engineering of Novel Fungal Natural Products. Commun. Chem. 2024, 7, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Naseema Rasheed, R.; Pourbakhtiar, A.; Mehdizadeh Allaf, M.; Baharlooeian, M.; Rafiei, N.; Alishah Aratboni, H.; Morones-Ramirez, J.R.; Winck, F.V. Microalgal Co-Cultivation-Recent Methods, Trends in Omic-Studies, Applications, and Future Challenges. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1193424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oppong-Danquah, E.; Blümel, M.; Scarpato, S.; Mangoni, A.; Tasdemir, D. Induction of Isochromanones by Co-Cultivation of the Marine Fungus Cosmospora Sp. and the Phytopathogen Magnaporthe Oryzae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mtafya, B.; Musisi, E.; Qwaray, P.; Sichone, E.; Walbaum, N.; Ntinginya, N.E.; Gillespie, S.H.; Sabiiti, W. Quantifying Viable M. Tuberculosis Safely Obviating the Need for High Containment Facilities. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024, 2833, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  107. Gordon, S.V.; Parish, T. Microbe Profile: Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Humanity’s Deadly Microbial Foe. Microbiology 2018, 164, 437–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Baker, J.J.; Johnson, B.K.; Abramovitch, R.B. Slow Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at Acidic pH Is Regulated by PhoPR and Host-associated Carbon Sources. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 94, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Andries, K.; Verhasselt, P.; Guillemont, J.; Göhlmann, H.W.H.; Neefs, J.-M.; Winkler, H.; Van Gestel, J.; Timmerman, P.; Zhu, M.; Lee, E.; et al. A Diarylquinoline Drug Active on the ATP Synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2005, 307, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dutta, N.K.; Karakousis, P.C. Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Myths, Models, and Molecular Mechanisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 343–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Magombedze, G.; Dowdy, D.; Mulder, N. Latent Tuberculosis: Models, Computational Efforts and the Pathogen’s Regulatory Mechanisms during Dormancy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2013, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ahmad, S. Pathogenesis, Immunology, and Diagnosis of Latent Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2011, 2011, 814943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lin, P.L.; Flynn, J.L. Understanding Latent Tuberculosis: A Moving Target. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Azhari, M.; Litanjuasari, A.P.; Singgih, M.; Arai, M.; Handayani, D.; Artasasta, M.A.; Julianti, E. Activity of Ethyl Acetate Extracts of Marine-Derived Fungi against Active and Hypoxia-Induced Dormant Mycobacterium. J. Pharm. Pharmacogn. Res. 2025, 13, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pahl, H.L.; Krauss, B.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; Decker, T.; Traenckner, E.B.; Vogt, M.; Myers, C.; Parks, T.; Warring, P.; Mühlbacher, A.; et al. The Immunosuppressive Fungal Metabolite Gliotoxin Specifically Inhibits Transcription Factor NF-KappaB. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1829–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mayura, K.; Wallace Hayes, A.; Berndt, W.O. Teratogenicity of Secalonic Acid d in Rats. Toxicology 1982, 25, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xiao, J.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, G.-Y.; Liu, R.-M.; Li, X.-G.; Zhang, L.-T.; Chen, D.-X.; Zhong, J.-J. Synergistic Antitumor Efficacy of Antibacterial Helvolic Acid from Cordyceps Taii and Cyclophosphamide in a Tumor Mouse Model. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hald, B.; Christensen, D.H.; Krogh, P. Natural Occurrence of the Mycotoxin Viomellein in Barley and the Associated Quinone-Producing Penicillia. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 1983, 46, 1311–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gupta, A.K.; Ahmad, I.; Borst, I.; Summerbell, R.C. Detection of Xanthomegnin in Epidermal Materials Infected with Trichophyton Rubrum. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2000, 115, 901–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Sabater-Vilar, M.; Nijmeijer, S.; Fink-Gremmels, J. Genotoxicity Assessment of Five Tremorgenic Mycotoxins (Fumitremorgen B, Paxilline, Penitrem A, Verruculogen, and Verrucosidin) Produced by Molds Isolated from Fermented Meats. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 2123–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lambert, C.; Schmidt, K.; Karger, M.; Stadler, M.; Stradal, T.E.B.; Rottner, K. Cytochalasans and Their Impact on Actin Filament Remodeling. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gauthier, T.; Wang, X.; Sifuentes Dos Santos, J.; Fysikopoulos, A.; Tadrist, S.; Canlet, C.; Artigot, M.P.; Loiseau, N.; Oswald, I.P.; Puel, O. Trypacidin, a Spore-Borne Toxin from Aspergillus Fumigatus, Is Cytotoxic to Lung Cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Villanueva-Silva, R.; Velez, P.; Riquelme, M.; Fajardo-Hernández, C.A.; Martínez-Cárdenas, A.; Arista-Romero, A.; Wan, B.; Ma, R.; Qader, M.; Franzblau, S.G.; et al. Chemical Diversity and Antimicrobial Potential of Cultivable Fungi from Deep-Sea Sediments of the Gulf of Mexico. Molecules 2021, 26, 7328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chen, M.; Hao, B.-C.; Zhu, X.-H.; Zhang, L.-K.; Zheng, Y.-Y.; Zhou, X.-J.; Schäberle, T.F.; Shen, L.; Wang, C.-Y.; Liu, Y. Molecular Networking Reveals Indole Diterpenoids from the Marine-Derived Fungus Penicillium Sp. N4-3. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2025, 7, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Nothias, L.-F.; Petras, D.; Schmid, R.; Dührkop, K.; Rainer, J.; Sarvepalli, A.; Protsyuk, I.; Ernst, M.; Tsugawa, H.; Fleischauer, M.; et al. Feature-Based Molecular Networking in the GNPS Analysis Environment. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Paguigan, N.D.; El-Elimat, T.; Kao, D.; Raja, H.A.; Pearce, C.J.; Oberlies, N.H. Enhanced Dereplication of Fungal Cultures via Use of Mass Defect Filtering. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chung, H.; Chen, K.; Shen, T.; Hsu, C. Molecular Networking as a Dereplication Strategy for Monitoring Metabolites of Natural Product Treated Cancer Cells. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 34, e8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Roberts, J.; Bingham, J.; McLaren, A.C.; McLemore, R. Liposomal Formulation Decreases Toxicity of Amphotericin B In Vitro and In Vivo. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2015, 473, 2262–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Faustino, C.; Pinheiro, L. Lipid Systems for the Delivery of Amphotericin B in Antifungal Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Kumar, M.; Virmani, T.; Kumar, G.; Deshmukh, R.; Sharma, A.; Duarte, S.; Brandão, P.; Fonte, P. Nanocarriers in Tuberculosis Treatment: Challenges and Delivery Strategies. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Shao, L.; Shen, S.; Liu, H. Recent Advances in PLGA Micro/Nanoparticle Delivery Systems as Novel Therapeutic Approach for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 941077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Comas, L.; Polo, E.; Domingo, M.; Hernández, Y.; Arias, M.; Esteban, P.; Martínez-Lostao, L.; Pardo, J.; Martínez de la Fuente, J.; Gálvez, E. Intracellular Delivery of Biologically-Active Fungal Metabolite Gliotoxin Using Magnetic Nanoparticles. Materials 2019, 12, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ye, W.; Liu, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, W. The Toxic Mechanism of Gliotoxins and Biosynthetic Strategies for Toxicity Prevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antimycobacterial compounds from marine-derived fungi according to structure types.
Figure 1. Antimycobacterial compounds from marine-derived fungi according to structure types.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g001
Figure 2. Marine sources of the fungi (left) and the antimycobacterial-producing genera (right).
Figure 2. Marine sources of the fungi (left) and the antimycobacterial-producing genera (right).
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g002
Figure 3. All marine-derived fungi metabolites by type/year (left) and novelty/year (right).
Figure 3. All marine-derived fungi metabolites by type/year (left) and novelty/year (right).
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g003
Figure 4. Antimycobacterial compounds based on the novelty as per structure types.
Figure 4. Antimycobacterial compounds based on the novelty as per structure types.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g004
Figure 5. The Mycobacterium strains and enzymes used in the antimycobacterial assay.
Figure 5. The Mycobacterium strains and enzymes used in the antimycobacterial assay.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g005
Figure 6. Antimycobacterial MF NPs against replicating and non-replicating Mycobacterium.
Figure 6. Antimycobacterial MF NPs against replicating and non-replicating Mycobacterium.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g006
Figure 7. Compound distribution per producing genus: all compounds (left); novel compounds only (right).
Figure 7. Compound distribution per producing genus: all compounds (left); novel compounds only (right).
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g007
Figure 8. Fungal genera distribution in marine sources.
Figure 8. Fungal genera distribution in marine sources.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g008
Figure 9. Chemical structures of compounds 116.
Figure 9. Chemical structures of compounds 116.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g009
Figure 10. Chemical structures of compounds 1734.
Figure 10. Chemical structures of compounds 1734.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structures of compounds 3546.
Figure 11. Chemical structures of compounds 3546.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g011
Figure 12. Chemical structures of compounds 4769.
Figure 12. Chemical structures of compounds 4769.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g012
Figure 13. Chemical structures of compounds 7078.
Figure 13. Chemical structures of compounds 7078.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g013
Figure 14. Chemical structures of compounds 79101.
Figure 14. Chemical structures of compounds 79101.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g014
Figure 15. Chemical structures of compounds 102113.
Figure 15. Chemical structures of compounds 102113.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g015
Figure 16. Chemical structures of compounds 114131.
Figure 16. Chemical structures of compounds 114131.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g016
Figure 17. Chemical structures of compounds 132139.
Figure 17. Chemical structures of compounds 132139.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g017
Figure 18. The mechanism of action of several metabolites by inhibiting different targets from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Figure 18. The mechanism of action of several metabolites by inhibiting different targets from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Marinedrugs 23 00279 g018
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azhari, M.; Merliani, N.; Singgih, M.; Arai, M.; Julianti, E. Insights into Natural Products from Marine-Derived Fungi with Antimycobacterial Properties: Opportunities and Challenges. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070279

AMA Style

Azhari M, Merliani N, Singgih M, Arai M, Julianti E. Insights into Natural Products from Marine-Derived Fungi with Antimycobacterial Properties: Opportunities and Challenges. Marine Drugs. 2025; 23(7):279. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azhari, Muhammad, Novi Merliani, Marlia Singgih, Masayoshi Arai, and Elin Julianti. 2025. "Insights into Natural Products from Marine-Derived Fungi with Antimycobacterial Properties: Opportunities and Challenges" Marine Drugs 23, no. 7: 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070279

APA Style

Azhari, M., Merliani, N., Singgih, M., Arai, M., & Julianti, E. (2025). Insights into Natural Products from Marine-Derived Fungi with Antimycobacterial Properties: Opportunities and Challenges. Marine Drugs, 23(7), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop