Next Article in Journal
One-Step Preparative Separation of Fucoxanthin from Three Edible Brown Algae by Elution-Extrusion Countercurrent Chromatography
Previous Article in Journal
New 3-Acyl Tetramic Acid Derivatives from the Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Lecanicillium fusisporum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Glimpse at Siderophores Production by Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444

1
“TheBlueChemistryLab”, Department of Pharmacy, Task Force “BIGFED2”, University of Naples Federico II, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy
3
Department of Biology, Complesso Universitario Monte Sant’Angelo via Cinthia–Edificio 7, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Napoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(4), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20040256
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 4 April 2022 / Published: 6 April 2022

Abstract

:
In this study, a strain of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444 was cultivated in six different concentrations of iron (III). Cultures were extracted with organic solvents and analyzed using our dereplication strategy, based on the combined use of high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry and molecular networking. The analysis showed the presence of the siderophores’ family, named synechobactins, only in the zero iron (III) treatment culture. Seven unknown synechobactin variants were present in the extract, and their structures have been determined by a careful HRMS/MS analysis. This study unveils the capability of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444 to produce a large array of siderophores and may be a suitable model organism for a sustainable scale-up exploitation of such bioactive molecules, for the bioremediation of contaminated ecosystems, as well as in drug discovery.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Living organisms require several kinds of metals for their wellness. In virtue of its unique coordination and redox chemistry, iron is, among the metal ions, involved in vital metabolic functions in plants, animals, and microorganisms. The two most frequent oxidation states of iron are +2 and +3, which are also referred to as ferrous and ferric, respectively. Because of its oxidation states, iron plays crucial roles in biocatalysis and electron transport chains, in several biological systems [1]. Microbes use different methods to collect iron from the environment; among others, they produce Fe3+-chelating molecules, named siderophores [2]. Siderophores are low-molecular-weight molecules (500–1500 Da), endowed with and named after their high affinity for iron (III) (Kf > 1030). Pathogens adapt their own iron-uptake strategy, in response to the type of infection (acute or chronic) and to the availability of iron [3] of the host. Acting as ferric ion scavengers, siderophores contribute significantly to the virulence of pathogenic microbes. Fe3+ is transported inside the cell as a hexadentate octahedral complex with the siderophores. Depending on the primary oxygen-donating ligands that bind the iron, siderophores are classified as follows: hydroxamates, catecholates, carboxylates, and mixed-types siderophores [4].
Siderophores are powerful molecules that have applications in ecological research; for the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons from oceans and as algal bloom biocontrollers, in agriculture as soil bioremediators, and in drug discovery as iron chelation therapy, antibiotic carriers, and fish pathogen biocontrollers [5,6,7]. The most intriguing application is their use as ligands for antibiotics, the so-called “Trojan horse” strategy [8]. The potential chemical space of siderophore–antibiotic conjugates is a great opportunity to explore an untapped natural resource and design a new class of molecules to face drug-resistant pathogens [6,9].
Cyanobacteria are a class of photosynthetic microorganism, spread out in a large array of environments, from tropical areas to extremely cold waters. They are present in marine waters, as well as in freshwaters. This unique class of microorganisms is well known to produce several different classes of secondary metabolites, either toxins, named cyanotoxins, or bioactive natural products with interesting pharmacological properties [10]. Cyanobacteria rely on ferric iron to survive. While iron is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, bioavailable iron in freshwater and marine environments is limited, falling in the picomolar to a low nanomolar range. To survive in such an iron-depleted environment, cyanobacteria produce siderophores. Recently, it has been further speculated that cyanobacteria use siderophores as antimicrobial agents and as shields, to protect themselves from heavy-metal toxicity [11]. Cyanobacterial siderophores (Figure 1) include mainly either hydroxamates or catecholates [12]. The first evidence of presence and types of siderophores in cyanobacteria date back to the early 1980s, when iron uptake in Anabaena sp. in iron starvation conditions was demonstrated to be mediated by the hydroxamate-type siderophore schizokinen [13].
On the other hand, cyanobacterial genomes are known to harbor a rich variety of gene clusters with unknown function. Recently, we reported on the awakening of a widely distributed class of silent gene clusters by iron starvation that yielded cyanochelin’s production, β-hydroxy aspartate lipopeptides involved in iron uptake [14].
It is well known that a single strain produces different molecules when grown under different environmental conditions. This concept is the basis of the OSMAC (“One Strain, Many Compounds”) strategy [15], a cultivation-based approach that consists in altering cultivation parameters, such as nutrient content, metal ions, rate of aeration, temperature, in order to trigger the productions of compounds of biomedical interest and to activate silent biosynthetic gene clusters.
In this context, in the frame of our ongoing research on the potentiality of cyanobacteria as incubators of bioactive molecules, we investigated the metabolome of the strain of Anabaena flos-aquae (UTEX 1444), when cultivated in the condition of iron deficiency and iron overload. Our study revealed the presence of a suite of synechobactins (seven of which are new variants), only in the extracts from the “zero-Iron (III) treatment” culture.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Cultivation and Extraction of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444

The strain Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444 (Figure 2, from the collection of Prof. A. Pollio) was grown in a BG11 culture medium [16], at six different Fe3+ concentrations, in the form of ferric ammonium citrate, yielding to #1–6 cultures: 0 µM Fe3+ (#1), 5 µM Fe3+ (#2), 10 µM Fe3+ (#3), 20 µM Fe3+ (#4), 60 µM Fe3+ (#5), and 100 µM Fe3+ (#6). Cultures #1–6 were extracted using our lab’s standard procedure [17]. Shortly, all cultures were vortexed, sonicated, and then centrifuged to separate the solid pellets from the liquid supernatant. Pellets were extracted with mixtures of MeOH and CHCl3 while supernatants were extracted with BuOH. All the extracts were then subjected to liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). HRMS data were dereplicated using molecular networking analyses, as previously reported [18].

2.2. Molecular Networking and Synechobactins’ Identification

All extracts from cultures #1–6 were analyzed by LC-HRMS using an LTQ Orbitrap instrument. Data-dependent acquisition was used to trigger MS2 scans of the ten most intense ions detected in the full MS scan. The raw LC-MS data were pre-processed using the MZmine program 2.53 [19], which allowed us to remove isotopic peaks, to identify adducts and to perform quantitation. The preliminary analysis (data not shown) of MZmine data revealed that the most significant extract for each culture was that of butanol, as the most representative of each entire metabolome. Therefore, the subsequent data processing and molecular networking were performed on the butanol extracts, originating from #1–6 cultures. The global .mgf file, containing the MS2 data from #1–6 butanol extract and the quantitation table obtained by mzMine were submitted to the online platform at the Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking website [20], where a Feature-Based Molecular Network (FBMN) was generated https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/status.jsp?task=664d019a6b52486d880014bb1e16bd69 (accessed on 12 November 2021) [21]. The resulting molecular network was then visualized using the Cytoscape program 3.9.0 [22] (see also Figures S1–S13, Supplementary Material).
The comprehensive quali-quantitative network of #1–6 butanol extracts (Figure 3a) contains 165 features, grouped into 10 clusters. In the network, each node is represented as a pie chart showing the amount of the compound in the source cultures containing different iron concentrations (Figure 3b).
One of the ten clusters was composed of 23 nodes, 13 of which were derived solely from the zero iron (III) culture (Figure 3c, nodes in red). These nodes did not match any known compounds in GNPS’ library. The ESI-HRMS spectrum of each of these compounds displayed, in addition to the [M + H]+ ion (apo form, not Fe-bound), an ion at 52.9117 amu difference [M + 56Fe − 3H]+, corresponding to their Fe-adduct, thus, suggesting the presence of Fe-chelating compounds. Six nodes were identified as synechobactins (Table 1), i.e., the hydroxamate-type siderophores. Synechobactins have a backbone consisting of citric acid, linked to two 1,3-diaminopropane units. The first diaminopropane unit is N-acetylated and N-hydroxylated, forming the hydroxamate group. The second diaminopropane unit is N-hydroxylated and N-acylated, with a fatty acid tail that varies in length and degree of unsaturation [23].
The first node of the series is schizokinen (apo [M + H]+, m/z 421.1934, C16H29O9N4+), the progenitor of the series, a symmetrical siderophore, in which both the two amino-terminals of the two diaminopropane units are acetylated, while the more lipophile synechobactin A (apo [M + H]+, m/z 561.3477, C26H49O9N4+) has a dodecanoyl chain. The ESI-HRMS2 spectrum of synechobactin A presents as a very peculiar fragment, due to the simultaneous loss of the acyl residue (C12H22O, 182.1661 amu) and a water molecule (probably originating from the citrate moiety), at m/z 361.1709 ([M – RCOH − H2O + H]+, C14H25O7N4+). This fragmentation is diagnostic, being present in all synechobactins [24], giving clear information about the nature of the molecule. Two additional fragments, originating from the sequential loss of water and the acetyl from the acetamide side (60.0206 amu, m/z [M + H]+ 501.3267, C24H45O7N4+) and of N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-hydroxyacetamide residue (132.0894 amu, m/z [M + H]+ 429.2582, C21H37O7N2+), were also observed, indicating the presence of the acetyl located on the second hydroxamate unit. Based on the typical fragmentation pattern of synechobactins, all the synechobactins of the cluster could be recognized. The ESI-HRMS2 spectra of synechobactin B (3), synechobactin C14 (4) and C16 (5), respectively, show the fragment ion at m/z 361.17 originated from the loss of the different fatty acid units, losses of 172.1465 amu (H2O and C10H18O), 228.2078 amu (H2O and C14H26O) and 256.2404 amu (H2O and C16H30O), respectively.
The molecular mass of 6, corresponding to the molecular formula of C30H55O9N4+, was 2 amu (2 hydrogen atoms) less than that of synechobactin C16 (5), suggesting the presence of a double bond. The additional unsaturation was allocated to the fatty acid tail, the peak at m/z 361.1706 in the MS2 spectrum of 6 resulting from the neutral loss of the unsaturated fatty acid C16H30O2 (254.2235 amu). The position and the configuration of the double bond remained unassigned. To the best of our knowledge, the only reported synechobactin structure in which an unsaturated acyl chain is present is rhizobactin (C10) [25]; therefore, we propose that synechobactin C16:1 (6) is a new compound. Similarly, compound 7 has been identified as the new synechobactin oxyC14, having a hydroxy acyl (tetradecanoyl) chain, as indicated by the loss from the pseudomolecular ion of 244.2045 amu (H2O and C14H26O2). Compound 8 (m/z 603.3579 C28H51O10N4+) is also a derivative of synechobactin C14; specifically, the loss of 242.1879 amu (H2O and C14H24O2) yields the fragment ion at m/z 361.1702 (C14H25O7N4+), corresponding to the unsaturated hydroxytetradecanoic acid. The position and the configuration of the additional hydroxyl and the double bond remained unassigned.
Compounds (18) share the same dihydroxamate-citrate moiety, being different only in the structure of the fatty acid residue; compounds 912 are modified in the polar part. Both the cleavages from the pseudomolecular ions’ peaks at m/z 517.3212 (9) and 545.3525 (10) of dodecanoic and tetradecanoic acid, respectively, are observed for synechobactin A and C14, generating the fragment ion C12H21O6N4+ (m/z 317.1459), in consistence with the non-acetylated hydroxamate/citrate backbone. This was confirmed by the presence of the peak at m/z 429.2601, in the MS2 spectrum of 9, due to the loss of the 3-(hydroxyamino)propan-1-amine (88.0634 amu, C3H8ON2) unit, which was also present in the MS2 spectrum of synechobactin A, due to the loss of the N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-hydroxyacetamide residue (132.0894 amu). The 15.9948 amu difference between synechobactin C14 (4) and the ion at m/z 573.3839 (compound 11) accounts for an oxygen atom. The loss of tetradecanoic acid from the pseudomolecular ion of 11 leads to the peak at m/z 345.1772 (C14H25O6N4), indicating that the oxygen atom is missing in the dihydroxamate-citrate portion of the molecule. The peak at m/z 328.1508 (C14H22O6N3), in both the MS2 spectra of synechobactin C14 (4) and deoxyC14 (11), corresponds to the fragment (citryl)-N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-hydroxyacetamide, pointing to the lack of a hydroxyl group on the nitrogen of the other hydroxamate. Likewise, in compound 12, the dehydrated form of deoxy synechobactin C14, dehydration occurs on the second hydroxamate unit. The thirteenth node of the synechobactins’ cluster (m/z 658.2852, C28H50O10N4Fe+) is the iron-bound ion of synechobactin oxyC14 (7).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444: Strain, Cultivation and Extraction

The genus Anabaena BORY ex BORN. et FLAH. 1888 encompasses filamentous, non-branched species, which differ in the form of cells, coiling of trichomes, shape and size of akinetes [26]. Anabaena species exhibit a wide range of strain-specific variability, and environmental conditions mainly affect cell dimensions and size of heterocysts [27].
The species A. flos-aquae Brébisson ex Bornet et Flahault 1888, is a free-floating organism, whose coiled filaments can be solitary or irregularly assembled, with narrow mucilaginous sheath. Cells are usually spherical to barrel-shaped, whereas akinetes can be cylindrical or elliptical and heterocysts usually spherical [28]. A. flos-aquae is diffused in freshwater environments worldwide and is responsible of blooms that can have noxious effects on other organisms, due to the excretion of toxic metabolites, as anatoxins [29].
From a taxonomical point of view, A. flos-aquae is a combined morphological group, in that an alternation of regularly and irregularly coiled filaments is observed for the same strain in laboratory cultures; moreover, vegetative cell shape and size, along with heterocysts and akinetes dimensions, were largely variable among different populations [30]. Considering that the type species of the genus Anabaena, A. oscillarioides Bory ex Bornet et Flahault 1888 is a benthic type, Wacklin et al. [31] proposed to transfer the planktic Anabaena types under the genus Dolichospermum, designating A. flos-aquae as the type species of the genus.
The strain Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444 was grown in BG-11 medium containing (per liter): 2.21 mg of Na2EDTA, 12 mg of Citric Acid, 1 g of NaNO3, 80 mg K2HPO4·3H2O, 150 mg of MgSO4·7H2O, 52.8 mg of CaCl2, 34.2 mg of NaCO3, 2 mL of Nitsch solution (H2SO4, MnSO4·H2O, ZnSO4·7H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, H3BO3, Na2MoO4·2H2O, CoCl3·6H2O), 500 µL of NiSO4 (NH4)2 SO4·6H2O (0.1 mM stock), 200 µL of Na2SeO4 (0.1 mM stock). Cultures were grown in six different concentrations of iron supplemented as ferric ammonium citrate in BG11 medium; serial dilutions from a mother ferric ammonium citrate solution (100 µM) were prepared in order to get the following final concentrations: 0 µM Fe3+ (#1), 5 µM Fe3+ (#2), 10 µM Fe3+ (#3), 20 µM Fe3+ (#4), 60 µM Fe3+ (#5), and 100 µM Fe3+ (#6). All cultures were made in triplicates and were incubated at room temperature (18–25 °C) for 30 days. Cultures were observed under an optical microscope (OPTECH, Biostar B3) and a fluorescence microscope (iRiS Digital Cell Imaging System–Logos Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA); then, they were vortexed, sonicated (ARGO Lab Digital Ultrasonic Cleaner, Model-DU 32, Carpi, Italy) at 20 KHz for 10 min at 23 °C, and centrifuged (HERMLE Labortechnik, Model-Z36HK, Wehingen, Germany) at 10,000 rpm for 5 min at 25 °C to separate the solid pellets from the liquid supernatant. Pellets were extracted with organic solvents as follows: MeOH (100%, 0.3 L), MeOH/CHCl3 (1:1, 0.3 L), and CHCl3 (100%, 0.3 L). All the extracts were paper filtered and concentrated under vacuum, yielding (average weights): 9.6 mg (#1), 6.6 mg (#2), 6.3 mg (#3), 9.0 mg (#4), 7.2 mg (#5) and 9.3 mg (#6) of MeOH extract; 2.3 mg (#1), 3.5 mg (#2), 4.3 mg (#3), 3.4 mg (#4), 1.2 mg (#5) and 2.5 mg (#6) of MeOH/CHCl3 extract; 7.6 mg (#1), 0.5 mg (#2), 1.7 mg (#3), 0.6 mg (#4), 1.3 mg (#5) and 0.3 mg (#6) of the CHCl3 extracts. Supernatants were extracted with BuOH. BuOH phases were concentrated under vacuum affording to 3.5 mg (#1), 13.3 mg (#2), 30.3 mg (#3), 45.6 mg (#4), 40.3 mg (#5) and 40.6 mg (#6) of extract. Each extract was resuspended in MeOH (100%, 5 mg/mL) for the subsequent LC-HRMS analyses.

3.2. LC-HRMS Analyses and Molecular Networking

LC-HRMS experiments were performed using a Thermo LTQ Orbitrap XL high-resolution ESI mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Spa, Rodano, Italy) coupled to an Agilent model 1100 LC system (Agilent Technologies, Cernusco sul Naviglio, Italy), which included a solvent reservoir, in-line degasser, binary pump, and refrigerated autosampler. A 5-µm Kinetex C18 column (50 × 2.10 mm), maintained at room temperature, was eluted at 200 mL min−1 with H2O (supplemented with 0.1% HCOOH) and MeOH, using gradient elution. The gradient program was as follows: 10% MeOH for 3 min, 10%→100% MeOH for 30 min, 100% MeOH for 7 min. Mass spectra were acquired in positive ion detection mode. MS parameters were a spray voltage of 4.8 kV, a capillary temperature of 285 °C, a sheath gas rate of 32 units N2 (ca. 150 mL/min), and an auxiliary gas rate of 15 units N2 (ca. 50 mL/min). Data were collected in the data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode, in which the first, the second, up until the tenth most intense ions of a full-scan mass spectrum were subjected to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HRMS/MS) analysis. The m/z range for data-dependent acquisition was set between 100 and 2000 amu. HRMS/MS scans were obtained for selected ions with CID fragmentation, isolation width of 2.0, normalized collision energy of 35, Activation Q of 0.250, and activation time of 30 ms. Data were analyzed using Thermo Xcalibur software.
Raw files were imported into MZmine 2.53 open-source software [14]. The mass detection was performed on raw data and exact masses with mass level 1 and centroided masses with mass level 2, by keeping the noise level at 1000. Chromatograms were built using an ADAP module with a minimum height of 1000, and m/z tolerance of 0.001 (or 5 ppm). Peak alignment was performed using the Join aligner algorithm (m/z tolerance at 0.005 (or 5 ppm), absolute RT tolerance at 0.2 min). [M + Na – H], [M + K – H], [M + Mg − 2H], [M + NH3], [M − Na + NH4], [M + 1, 13C], [M − 35Cl + 37Cl]+, [M + 56Fe − 3H]+ adducts were filtered out by setting the maximum relative height at 100%. Peaks without associated MS/MS spectra were finally filtered out from the peak list. Clustered data were then exported to .mgf file for GNPS, while chromatographic data including retention times, peak areas, and peak heights were exported to a .csv file.
A Feature-Based Molecular Network was generated on GNPS’ online platform [15], with the following parameters: the parent mass tolerance and MS/MS fragment ion tolerance were set both at 0.05 Da, the cosine score at above 0.5, and matched peaks above 5. Spectra were retained only if the nodes appeared in each other’s respective top 10 most similar nodes. The spectra in the network were then searched against GNPS spectral libraries using a cosine score above 0.7 and at least 6 matched peaks. The molecular network was visualized using Cytoscape software [16].

4. Conclusions

It is well known that cyanobacteria have a unique adaptive character due to their metabolism capability to react to adverse environmental conditions. They represent a large group of bioagents, less explored as bioresources that produce high-value natural products with biotechnological and ecological relevance. This paper reports on our study on the cyanobacteria Anabaena flos-aquae strain UTEX 1444, as a promising sustainable bioresource of bioactive molecules, i.e., siderophores. We explored metabolome variations when UTEX 1444 was cultivated in the condition of iron deficiency and iron overload. As presumed, the cultivation of the strain in conditions of iron deficiency revealed its capability to produce siderophores. In our procedure, to obtain a fast dereplication of #1–6 organic extracts, molecular networking analyses of MS/MS data were successfully used. Comprehensive FBMN, featuring #1–6 metabolites’ relative abundance comparison, immediately disclosed the presence of a cluster composed of metabolites, belonging only to the zero iron (III) culture and, therefore, allowed us to easily and quickly pinpoint the siderophore cluster; moreover, molecular networking allowed for a fast detection of synechobactins and new variants, thanks to their typical fragmentation pattern. HRMS/MS analysis and the fragmentation pattern of synechobactin A, C16 and the new synechobactin C16:1 are reported as a useful diagnostic way to detect them in any extract. The structure and the kind of cyanobacterial siderophores were determined in only a few previously published papers [7].
Together with the five known synechobactins, six new variants have been identified, showing unusual modifications occurring in the nature of the acyl chain (unsaturated, hydroxylated) and in the hydroxamate-citrate backbone. To our best knowledge, this is the first report unveiling the biosynthetic capability of UTEX 1444 to produce a large array of synechobactins. It is interesting to note that UTEX 1444 produced 11 variants, beside schizokinen, showing the ability to incorporate a variety of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, likely as a final biosynthetic step. Modifications also occur in the hydroxamate-citrate backbone, extending the chemical variants of the synechobactins known so far.
Considering the potential high impact of siderophores production as ferric ion scavengers, as well as toxic metal chelators, and then, the large array of applications in many different fields, from ecological research to drug discovery [5,6,7], our future studies will be focused on making UTEX 1444 a suitable model organism for a scale-up production of siderophores. This report, encompassing methodological improvements in siderophore production, characterization and detection through the dereplication of extracts, using a powerful bioinformatic approach, is a sustainable contribution to quest natural molecules that improve environmental and human health. Following EU direction, this study follows the “Do no significant harm” requirement and overcomes the “supply” problem that is the main bottleneck in the study of novel bioactive molecules from marine organisms.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md20040256/s1, Figure S1: Global molecular network of A. flos-aquae UTEX 1444’s extracts, Figure S2: MS/MS spectrum of schizokinen (1), Figure S3: MS/MS spectrum of synechobactin A (2), Figure S4: MS/MS spectrum of synechobactin B (3), Figure S5: MS/MS spectrum of synechobactin C14 (4), Figure S6: MS/MS spectrum of synechobactin C16 (5), Figure S7: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin C16:1 (6), Figure S8: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin C14OH (7), Figure S9: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin deacA (8), Figure S10: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin deacC14 (9), Figure S11: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin deoxyC14 (10), Figure S12: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin dehydroC14 (11), Figure S13: MS/MS spectrum of putative synechobactin C14:2OH (12).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.C. and M.S.; methodology, R.T., V.C. and M.S.; investigation, R.T., G.E., K.K. and S.S.; resources, V.C. and A.P.; data curation, R.T., G.E., K.K. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.T. and V.C.; writing—review and editing, M.S., A.P. and V.C.; supervision, V.C. and M.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by: Regione Basilicata; Project ALIMINTEGRA, GO NUTRIBAS financed on 16.1 PSR Basilicata funding ex D.G.R. No. 312/17 CUP: C31G18000210002; Italian Ministry of Economic Development “Fondo per la Crescita Sostenibile—Sportello “Agrifood” PON I&C 2014–2020”, Project No. F/200099/01-03/X45 and Bando contributo alla ricerca, Anno 2021, Progetto “CiaAQ”_PI: Valeria Costantino.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank “Laboratorio di Tecniche Spettroscopiche”, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università di Napoli Federico II and M. Lega (University of Naples “Parthenope”) for the assistance and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oves-Costales, D.; Kadi, N.; Challis, G.L. The long-overlooked enzymology of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase-independent pathway for virulence-conferring siderophore biosynthesis. Chem. Commun. 2009, 43, 6530–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Andrews, S.; Norton, I.; Salunkhe, A.S.; Goodluck, H.; Aly, W.S.M.; Mourad-Agha, H.; Cornelis, P. Control of Iron Metabolism in Bacteria. In Metallomics and the Cell; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 203–239. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cornelis, P.; Dingemans, J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Miethke, M.; Marahiel, M.A. Siderophore-Based Iron Acquisition and Pathogen Control. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 413–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kurth, C.; Kage, H.; Nett, M. Siderophores as molecular tools in medical and environmental applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 8212–8227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Negash, K.H.; Norris, J.K.; Hodgkinson, J.T. Siderophore–Antibiotic Conjugate Design: New Drugs for Bad Bugs? Molecules 2019, 24, 3314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Saha, M.; Sarkar, S.; Sarkar, B.; Sharma, B.K.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Tribedi, P. Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 3984–3999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nagoba, B.; Vedpathak, D. Medical applications of siderophores. Eur. J. Gen. Med. 2011, 8, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Teta, R.; Marteinsson, V.T.; Longeon, A.; Klonowski, A.M.; Groben, R.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Costantino, V.; Mangoni, A. Thermoactinoamide A, an Antibiotic Lipophilic Cyclopeptide from the Icelandic Thermophilic Bacterium Thermoactinomyces vulgaris. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 2530–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rastogi, R.P.; Madamwar, D.; Incharoensakdi, A. Bloom Dynamics of Cyanobacteria and Their Toxins: Environmental Health Impacts and Mitigation Strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Årstøl, E.; Hohmann-Marriott, M.F. Cyanobacterial Siderophores—Physiology, Structure, Biosynthesis, and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Řezanka, T.; Palyzová, A.; Sigler, K. Isolation and identification of siderophores produced by cyanobacteria. Folia Microbiol. 2018, 63, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Goldman, S.J.; Lammers, P.J.; Berman, M.S.; Sanders Loehr, J. Siderophore-mediated in iron uptake in different strains of Anabaena sp. J. Bacteriol. 1983, 156, 1144–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Galica, T.; Borbone, N.; Mareš, J.; Kust, A.; Caso, A.; Esposito, G.; Saurav, K.; Hájek, J.; Řeháková, K.; Urajová, P.; et al. Cyanochelins, an Overlooked Class of Widely Distributed Cyanobacterial Siderophores, Discovered by Silent Gene Cluster Awakening. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e03128-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Romano, S.; Jackson, S.A.; Patry, S.; Dobson, A.D.W. Extending the “one strain many compounds” (OSMAC) principle to marine microorganisms. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Berberoğlu, H.; Jay, J.; Pilon, L. Effect of nutrient media on photobiological hydrogen production by Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 1172–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Teta, R.; Sala, G.D.; Esposito, G.; Stornaiuolo, M.; Scarpato, S.; Casazza, M.; Anastasio, A.; Lega, M.; Costantino, V. Monitoring Cyanobacterial Blooms during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Campania, Italy: The Case of Lake Avernus. Toxins 2021, 13, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Esposito, G.; Teta, R.; Marrone, R.; De Sterlich, C.; Casazza, M.; Anastasio, A.; Lega, M.; Costantino, V. A Fast Detection Strategy for Cyanobacterial blooms and associated cyanotoxins (FDSCC) reveals the occurrence of lyngbyatoxin A in campania (South Italy). Chemosphere 2019, 225, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pluskal, T.; Castillo, S.; Villar-Briones, A.; Orešič, M. MZmine 2: Modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Global Natural Product Social. Available online: https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/static/gnps-splash.jsp (accessed on 20 May 2021).
  21. Nothias, L.F.; Petras, D.; Schmid, R.; Dührkop, K.; Rainer, J.; Sarvepalli, A.; Protsyuk, I.; Ernst, M.; Tsugawa, H.; Fleischauer, M.; et al. Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ito, Y.; Butler, A. Structure of synechobactins, new siderophores of the marine cyanobacterium. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2005, 50, 1918–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boiteau, R.M.; Repeta, D.J. An extended siderophore suite from Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 revealed by LC-ICPMS-ESIMS. Metallomics 2015, 7, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Persmark, M.; Pittman, P.; Buyer, J.S.; Schwyn, B.; Gill, P.R.; Neilands, J.B. Isolation and structure of rhizobactin 1021, a siderophore from the alfalfa symbiont Rhizobium meliloti 1021. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3950–3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Komárek, J.; Anagnostidis, K. Modern approach to the classification system of cyanophytes 4. nostocales. Arch. Fuer Hydrobiol. Suppl. 1989, 82, 247–345. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zapomělová, E.; Řeháková, K.; Jezberová, J.; Komárková, J. Polyphasic characterization of eight planktonic Anabaena strains (Cyanobacteria) with reference to the variability of 61 Anabaena populations observed in the field. Hydrobiologia 2010, 639, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, R.; Watanabe, M.; Watanabe, M.M. Taxonomic studies of planktic species of Anabaena based on morphological characteristics in cultured strains. Hydrobiologia 2000, 438, 117–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moreira, C.; Vasconcelos, V.; Antunes, A. Cyanobacterial Blooms: Current Knowledge and New Perspectives. Earth 2022, 3, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zapomělová, E.; Řeháková, K.; Znachor, P.; Komárková, J. Morphological diversity of coiled planktonic types of the genus Anabaena (cyanobacteria) in natural populations—Taxonomic consequences. Cryptogam. Algol. 2007, 28, 353–371. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wacklin, P.; Hoffmann, L.; Komárek, J. Nomenclatural validation of the genetically revised cyanobacterial genus Dolichospermum (RALFS ex BORNET et FLAHAULT) comb. nova. Fottea 2009, 9, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Examples of cyanobacterial siderophores. Iron-binding moieties are highlighted as follows: hydroxamate-citrate units are colored in blue-orange, catecholates-phenolates are in red, α-hydroxy carboxylate is in green.
Figure 1. Examples of cyanobacterial siderophores. Iron-binding moieties are highlighted as follows: hydroxamate-citrate units are colored in blue-orange, catecholates-phenolates are in red, α-hydroxy carboxylate is in green.
Marinedrugs 20 00256 g001
Figure 2. (a) Cultures of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. Microscopic observation of 0 µM Fe3+ (#1) culture with (b) optical microscope and (c) fluorescence microscope (RFP filter).
Figure 2. (a) Cultures of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. Microscopic observation of 0 µM Fe3+ (#1) culture with (b) optical microscope and (c) fluorescence microscope (RFP filter).
Marinedrugs 20 00256 g002
Figure 3. Molecular networking and HRMS/MS analysis of extracts of #1–6 cultures of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. (a) The molecular network obtained combining the LC-HRMS/MS analyses of all the extracts of #1–6 cultures. Nodes are labeled with parent mass. (b) Nodes are represented as a pie chart showing the source culture of the compound ([Fe3+] = 0 µM (red), 5 µM (orange), 10 µM (dark yellow), 20 µM (yellow), 60 µM (green), 100 µM (blue)). (c) Cluster of synechobactins, present almost exclusively in zero iron (III) culture (0 µM, red). (d) HRMS/MS analysis and fragmentation pattern of synechobactin A, C16 and the new synechobactin C16:1.
Figure 3. Molecular networking and HRMS/MS analysis of extracts of #1–6 cultures of Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. (a) The molecular network obtained combining the LC-HRMS/MS analyses of all the extracts of #1–6 cultures. Nodes are labeled with parent mass. (b) Nodes are represented as a pie chart showing the source culture of the compound ([Fe3+] = 0 µM (red), 5 µM (orange), 10 µM (dark yellow), 20 µM (yellow), 60 µM (green), 100 µM (blue)). (c) Cluster of synechobactins, present almost exclusively in zero iron (III) culture (0 µM, red). (d) HRMS/MS analysis and fragmentation pattern of synechobactin A, C16 and the new synechobactin C16:1.
Marinedrugs 20 00256 g003
Table 1. Synechobactins in Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. The new variants are highlighted in yellow.
Table 1. Synechobactins in Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. The new variants are highlighted in yellow.
No.Nameapo [M + H]+Molecular FormulatR (min)
1Skizokinen421.1934C16H29O9N4+4.7
2Synechobactin A 561.3477C26H49O9N4+30.7
3Synechobactin B533.3165C24H45O9N4+27.7
4Synechobactin C14589.3788C28H53O9N4+33.0
5Synechobactin C16617.4098C30H57O9N4+35.1
6Synechobactin C16:1615.3940C30H55O9N4+33.6
7Synechobactin oxyC14605.3734C28H53O10N4+30.9
8Synechobactin oxyC14:1603.3579C28H51O10N4+30.7
9Desacetyl-synechobactin A517.3212C24H45O8N4+30.3
10Desacetyl-synechobactin C14 545.3525C26H49O8N4+32.7
11Deoxysynechobactin C14 573.3839C28H53O8N4+32.4
12Deoxysynechobactin C14:1571.3681C28H51O8N4+33.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teta, R.; Esposito, G.; Kundu, K.; Stornaiuolo, M.; Scarpato, S.; Pollio, A.; Costantino, V. A Glimpse at Siderophores Production by Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20040256

AMA Style

Teta R, Esposito G, Kundu K, Stornaiuolo M, Scarpato S, Pollio A, Costantino V. A Glimpse at Siderophores Production by Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. Marine Drugs. 2022; 20(4):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20040256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teta, Roberta, Germana Esposito, Karishma Kundu, Mariano Stornaiuolo, Silvia Scarpato, Antonino Pollio, and Valeria Costantino. 2022. "A Glimpse at Siderophores Production by Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444" Marine Drugs 20, no. 4: 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20040256

APA Style

Teta, R., Esposito, G., Kundu, K., Stornaiuolo, M., Scarpato, S., Pollio, A., & Costantino, V. (2022). A Glimpse at Siderophores Production by Anabaena flos-aquae UTEX 1444. Marine Drugs, 20(4), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20040256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop