Next Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of Nanocomposite Hydrogel Based on Alginate/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Loaded with Linum usitatissimum Extract as a Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold
Next Article in Special Issue
Formulation of New Media from Dairy and Brewery Wastes for a Sustainable Production of DHA-Rich Oil by Aurantiochytrium mangrovei
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Neurotoxins’ Effects on Environmental and Human Health: An OMICS Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seaweed Blends as a Valuable Source of Polyunsaturated and Healthy Fats for Nutritional and Food Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Investigation of Deep-Sea Ecosystems Using Marker Fatty Acids: Sources of Essential Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Abyssal Megafauna

by
Vasily I. Svetashev
A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 17 Palchevskogo Str., Vladivostok 690041, Russia
Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20010017
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 17 December 2021 / Accepted: 18 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fatty Acids from the Oceans)

Abstract

:
Abyssal seafloor ecosystems cover more than 50% of the Earth’s surface. Being formed by mainly heterotrophic organisms, they depend on the flux of particulate organic matter (POM) photosynthetically produced in the surface layer of the ocean. As dead phytoplankton sinks from the euphotic to the abyssal zone, the trophic value of POM and the concentration of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) decrease. This results in pronounced food periodicity and limitations for bottom dwellers. Deep-sea invertebrate seston eaters and surface deposit feeders consume the sinking POM. Other invertebrates utilize different food items that have undergone a trophic upgrade, with PUFA synthesized from saturated and monounsaturated FA. Foraminifera and nematodes can synthesize arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), while some barophylic bacteria produce EPA and/or docosahexaenoic acid. FA analysis of deep-sea invertebrates has shown high levels of PUFA including, in particular, arachidonic acid, bacterial FA, and a vast number of new and uncommon fatty acids such as 21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), 23:4(n-9), and 22:5(n-5) characteristic of foraminifera. We suppose that bacteria growing on detritus having a low trophic value provide the first trophic upgrading of organic matter for foraminifera and nematodes. In turn, these metazoans perform the second-stage upgrading for megafauna invertebrates. Deep-sea megafauna, including major members of Echinodermata, Mollusca, and Polychaeta display FA markers characteristic of bacteria, foraminifera, and nematodes and reveal new markers in the food chain.

1. Introduction: General Characteristics of the Abyssal Zone

Abyssal ecosystems located at depths of 3000–6000 m occupy almost 55% of the Earth’s surface. These ecosystems are characterized by relatively stable conditions: high hydrostatic pressure, water salinity, oxygen content, and low water temperature (0–3 °C) [1,2,3]. The abyssal seafloor is mostly covered by muddy sediments. In addition, ferromanganese nodules that are widespread in the deep-sea zones may cover more than 50% of the seafloor, especially in the Pacific Ocean [3,4]. Abyssal bottom ecosystems are characterized by a lack of in situ primary production (except those formed near hydrothermal vents and cold seeps). Only around 1% of surface photosynthesis products reach the bottom [5,6,7]. Particulate organic matter (POM), which is a major source of energy in the benthic environment, mainly consists of the remains of planktonic organisms, fecal pellets, and molts. The POM reaching the seafloor after being subject to complex biological modifications during sinking has a relatively low nutritional value [8,9,10]. This concerns, in particular, the level of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) which are necessary for the normal development of abyssal meio-, macro-, and megafauna [11,12,13]. Major essential PUFA for marine invertebrates are eicosapentaenoic (EPA), docosahexaenoic (DHA), and, to a lesser degree, arachidonic acids synthesized mainly by microalgae in the photosynthesis zone of the ocean [11]. These PUFA are crucially important for the normal functioning of biological membranes under extreme environmental conditions in the abyssal zone [14,15,16]. In this review, we consider the FA compositions of deep-sea sediments, detritus, bacteria, protists, and macro- and mega-fauna. Special attention is paid to marker fatty acids and trophic upgrading in abyssal ecosystems.

2. Some Notes on Samples Used for Lipid Extraction and the Methods of Fatty Acid Analysis

Deep-sea samples are not always available in sufficient amounts for dissection; some of them are subject to damage and loss of integrity during collection and retrieval to the surface. Small animals are difficult or impossible to dissect for the separation of tissues, so they are extracted whole. In the cited articles, for the analysis of holothurian lipids, the body wall was used; for sea stars, tube feet; and for sea urchins, total guts after washing out sediments. In mollusks, muscle tissue was analyzed. More detailed information about sample treatment can be found in the cited articles.
To date, a total of more than 1000 fatty acids have been found in nature, with this number constantly growing. Currently, analysis of fatty acids as methyl ester derivatives (FAME) is almost a routine procedure. Gas chromatography of a complex mixture of FAME on a carbowax-based (Supelcowax, DB-Wax, or similar) polar column takes less than 1 h. FAME peaks in a GC chromatogram are usually identified using various commercial FAME standards. The major problem is the lack of standards for all fatty acids. The second most efficient method for identification is the calculation of equivalent chain length (ECL) values by comparing them to published data [17]. Furthermore, one can compare the calculated ECL to theoretical values and even suggest the structure of the acid [18,19]. FA analysis of abyssal organisms showed many unusual peaks of FA in chromatograms (Figure 1), which are absent in the lipids of shallow-water marine invertebrates [20,21,22]. Some of them were present at a concentration of up to 6 mol%. For more accurate identification, two types of capillary columns should be used: polar columns, which provide a good separation of most FAME, and non-polar columns for the analysis of acids with carbon chains longer than 24 carbon atoms. For example, FAME 22:4(n-8), 22:5(n-5), and 22:6(n-3) form a single unresolved peak on an MDN-5S non-polar column, whereas these FAME are separated on a polar column. A major source of structural data is GC–MS of FAME, dimethyloxazoline (DMOX), and pyrrolidide derivatives. In general, the MS spectra of FAME give limited information: molecular mass and relation to (n-3) or (n-6) family. The spectra of DMOX derivatives are useful for determining the positions of all double bonds by GC–MS. An important advantage of these derivatives is the low temperature of separation, only by 5–10 °C higher than for FAME. It gives an opportunity to use them for GC–MS analysis of DMOX derivatives on a polar column. A mild method for the preparation of DMOX derivatives, which is performed at a low temperature, has been proposed recently [23]. Pyrrolidide derivatives of FA are more suitable for structural analysis of monoenoic and branched-chain FA [24]. Analysis of octadecapentaenoic acid 18:5(n-3) is also worth mentioning here. This acid is a characteristic component of lipids of many microalgae, as well as lipids of photosynthetic dinoflagellates. Its concentration varied from 3 to 43% of total lipids. However, the use of esterification methods based on the preliminary saponification of lipids or base-catalyzed transesterification resulted in a mixture of double-bond positional isomers of the 18:5 acid [25]. The best and simplest way to avoid incorrect GC results is using the standard acid catalyzed methylation.

3. Fatty Acids of Abyssal Bottom Sediments

Sediments are a complex mixture of components sinking from the ocean’s photosynthetic zone. Particulate organic carbon (POC) is transported to the bottom as detritus aggregates loaded with inorganic particles including mainly calcite CaCO3 and biogenic opal. Most POC is remineralized through metabolic processes in the epipelagic ecosystem. The remaining POC, constituting roughly one-fifth of the primary production (PP), leaves the epipelagic zone as the export production of carbon (EP) [6]. Eventually, only approximately 1% of initial PP reaches the seafloor [4]. Levels of major biological components—total organic carbon, nitrogen, and lipids—significantly decrease with depth [8,9,26,27]. The lipid content and fatty acid composition of POC and sediments vary widely. In the Western Crozet Basin (Indian Ocean, depths 3615–4750 m, four stations), the total lipid (TL) content was from 74 to 1033 μg/L in overlying particles and fluffs, and from 24 to 97 μg/g dry weight (DW) in surficial sediments [28]. The PUFA content was 1–3%, represented mainly by AA, EPA, and DHA. The major MUFA were 16:1(n-7), 18:1(n-7), and 18:1(n-9). Branched and cyclic FA made up 7–13%, and the total proportion of bacterial markers (branched, cyclic, 18:1(n-7), and SFA > C20) reached 33–46% [28]. Similarly, in sediments from the Cape Verde Plateau (depth 3100 m), the concentration of TL, mainly PL, was 0.22 mg/g DW; the PUFA (EPA, DHA, and AA) content was 7.2%; and bacterial FA content was 19% [29]. A significant PUFA (DHA, EPA, and AA) content, 4–10% in sediment and 5–14% in POM, and a relatively low bacterial FA content were recorded from deep-sea sediments collected in the Southern Ocean [30,31]. Nevertheless, reports about the lack of PUFA in sediments are quite usual [9,32]. In deep-sea sediments, the major components are generally saturated and monoenoic acids and a low level of PUFA. Due to the variation in data on lipids and fatty acids between different regions and stations, it would be better to consider the results of FA analysis for deep-sea megafauna along with information on reference sediments.

4. Fatty Acids of Foraminifera

Foraminifera are a major component of a deep-sea benthic community [33,34,35]. They are ubiquitously distributed in marine sediments, from shallow to deep-sea waters of the ocean. Foraminifera’s significance and relative biomass increase with depth, reaching 50% of top sediment biomass [34]. The comparable biomasses of foraminifera and metazoan meiofauna suggest that both groups may play an important role in functions of the deep-sea benthic community and, therefore, in carbon cycling [33]. According to [36], foraminifera are probably the most important eukaryotic members of abyssal sediment communities. The trophic diversity of foraminifera is well known. Bathyal species include herbivores and opportunistic deposit feeders (omnivores) that consume labile organic matter. Abyssal foraminifera ingests sediment, associated bacteria, and more refractory organic matter [36,37], while some species can be carnivorous [38]. Deep-sea foraminifera species feed on bacteria by ingesting bacterial cells, in addition to relatively large volumes of associated sediment and organic detritus, during deposit-feeding [39]. It can be assumed that the trophic role of labile organic matter decreases with depth, and the major food supply for foraminifera in the abyssal zone are low-value detritus and sediment bacteria. Accordingly, benthic foraminifera can be a trophic link between low-value phytodetritus and bacteria and benthic metazoans [40,41]. Since the input of detritus depends on the place and time of sample collection, it would be more correct to analyze foraminifera and reference sediments in parallel, where possible.
Deep-sea abyssal foraminifera generally show some specific FA composition. In the deep-sea Bathysiphon capillary, MUFA (18:1(n-7), 20:1(n-9), and 22:1(n-7)) were found at a level of 39% [42]. The AA content exceeded the level of 20:5(n-3) and 22:6(n-3). Moreover, C20 and C22 non-methylene interrupted (NMID) acids of bacterial origin were found in significant amounts [43,44]. In phospholipids of the deep-sea Xenophyophore, an exceptionally high level of bacterial FA (33%) and small amounts of AA, EPA, and DHA (8.4% in total) were recorded [29]. In lipids of reference sediments, the bacterial FA content was 18.8%, and the total PUFA content was 6.4% [31]. Mixed samples of foraminifera from the Antarctic abyssal showed noticeable amounts of AA, EPA, DHA, and 18:3(n-6) acids. The level of odd- and branched-chain (bacterial) FA was low, ~3%. Furthermore, the levels of these FA in reference POM and sediments were <1%. There was also a noticeable ratio, 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7) > 1, characteristic of phytoplankton. Experiments in situ on a lander system at a depth of 140 m and in an on-board laboratory showed a remarkable accumulation of arachidonic acid (10-fold) and 18:1(n-7) in the foraminifera Uvigerina ex. Gr. Semiornata after being incubated with a 13C-labeled diatom, Thalassiosira weisflogii. [45]. The authors suggested this foraminifera to carry out its own biosynthesis of arachidonic acid and discussed its role as a possible major source of AA in the benthic food web. Similar results and conclusions on AA biosynthesis were also reported for the benthic shallow-water foraminifera Ammonia tepida [46]. In the common benthic foraminifera A. tepida feeding on diatoms in oxic and anoxic conditions, the major PUFA were EPA > AA > DHA > 22:5(n-3). However, only arachidonic acid demonstrated the most significant increase. In the Antarctic shelf (depth 570 m), three species of benthic foraminifera showed selective feeding on phytodetritus [47,48]. The authors found a low PUFA content ranging from 5.4 to 30% and, accordingly, low levels of AA (0.8–9.4%), EPA (0.2–9.4%), and DHA (1.1–5.1%). The level of bacterial FA varied from 5 to 11.4%. In the Southern Ocean, a deep-sea mixed sample of foraminifera was found to contain a high proportion of 20:4(n-6), up to 21% of total FA, but not in reference sediments and POM [31]. The level of EPA and DHA was lower than AA. Oleic (18:1(n-9)) and cis-vaccenic 18:1(n-11) acids were at comparable concentrations. An analysis of the FA of four foraminifera species (Bathysiphon lanosum, B. major, Rhabdamina abyssorum, and Rh. parabyssorum) from the abyssal zone off the Kuril Islands showed a very high PUFA content, 46.8–53.8%, while the MUFA and SFA contents were 28–43% and 9.6–25%, respectively [20]. Arachidonic acid was a major PUFA, reaching up to 28%, and cis-vaccenic acid was a major MUFA reaching 25.3%. Representatives of the two genera were similar in PUFA content but showed significant variations in AA, EPA, and DHA contents. Moreover, these species had high levels of branched and odd-chain acids, 14 and 5.5%, respectively. With one more bacterial FA 18:1(n-7) taken into account, the total of bacterial FA reached 30%. B. lanosum and B. major had remarkable levels of NMID acids, 20.8 and 10.7%, respectively [20]. These foraminifera species were found to contain 10 new, and a number of uncommon fatty acids, mainly monoenoic and dienoic with the first double bond at positions Δ4 and Δ7 (Table 1). The levels of the new acids were quite high: 20:2(n-13) amounted to 8.8%; 22:2Δ7,12, 22:4(n-8), and 23:4(n-9) amounted to 2%. It is worth mentioning that the latter two acids are members of the homologous series of arachidonic acid, 20:4(n-6), 21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), and 23:4(n-9). The first acid in this series, 21:4(n-7), was first found in the amphipod Pontoporeia femorata [48] and later in thraustochytrids [49]. The authors suggested a way of biosynthesis which is also suitable for 22:4(n-8) and 23:4(n-9) acids [50]. In a recently published paper, rare and uncommon PUFA in abyssal foraminifera have been considered [21]. Lipids of Reophax nodulosus were found to contain 8% odd- and branched-chain FA, 17% SFA, 22% MUFA, and 53% PUFA. The AA content was two-fold higher than EPA; DHA constituted only 1%. Cis-vaccenic acid was the major MUFA. In addition, new acids of the omega-5 family were revealed: 20:3(n-5), 22:3(n-5), and 22:5(n-5). The latter of them was a major component at a concentration of 18.3% [21]. Earlier, omega-5 FA with odd carbon chains was also found in thraustochytrids [49]. One species, Pyrgo sp. Showed the presence of one more homologous series of FA related to 22:4(n-6): 23:4(n-7), 24:4(n-8), and 25:4(n-9). The author suggested a possible pathway of biosynthesis [21].
Indeed, the FA composition of foraminifera depends on available food. When available food is fresh detritus, foraminifera’s FA consist of mainly phytoplankton acids. With other diets (recalcitrant organic matter, bacterial, omnivorous, or carnivorous), FA composition can be quite different. Nevertheless, it is possible to find common features in foraminifera from different biotopes. Deep-sea foraminifera are characterized by high levels of PUFA, ~50% of total FA, with a major component (up to 25%) being arachidonic acid, which exceeds the EPA and DHA contents [20,31]. Foraminifera are capable of synthesizing arachidonic acid. Thus, they are possibly a major source of this acid in deep-sea ecosystems. The major monoenoic acids are 18:1(n-7) which originate from both detritus and bacteria and 18:1(n-9) at a ratio of > 1. Another characteristic feature is an exceptionally high concentration of bacterial branched and odd-chain FA (reaching in some cases 33%) and a high level (up to 20%) of non-methylene interrupted dienoic FA, which is also initially of bacterial origin. Some abyssal foraminifera species contain a number of uncommon and new FA, which can be a product of their own biosynthesis or modification of FA from bacteria ingested as food or biosynthesis in symbionts closely associated with these foraminifera. Table 1.

5. Fatty Acids of Nematodes

Nematodes are the most diverse, abundant, and very important animals in deep-sea sediments. They represent a very successful higher metazoan taxon, making up from 90 to 99% of the total metazoan abundance [51,52]. Nematodes become increasingly dominant, in terms of relative abundance and species richness, with depth. Free-living aquatic nematodes may feed on a diverse array of resources such as bacteria, Achaeans, protists, fungi, particulate and dissolved organic matter, and as predators prey on metazoans, including other nematodes [53]. Some free-living deep-sea nematode species are associated with symbiotic bacteria [54]. Nematodes may be an important source of PUFA for larger animals in deep-sea environments, where the nutritional quality of sediment organic matter is low [32].
One of the first reports on PUFA biosynthesis in the free-living nematode Turbatrix aceti was the article published in 1968 [55]. The authors clearly showed the synthesis of AA, 20:3(n-6), and EPA. The nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae, when cultivated on complex media, also synthesized PUFA 18:2, 20:2 20:3, and 20:4, all of the (n-6) series [56]. Only three ω3 acids, EPA, 20:4(n-3), and 18:3(n-3), were found. DHA was absent, and the amount of 18:1(n-7) prevailed over more common 18:1(n-9) [56]. The nematode Panagrellus redivivus growing on different media showed quite similar FA compositions: the lack of DHA, AA, and 20:3(n-6) > EPA, and a high ratio of (n-6)/(n-3) 5–18, 18:1(n-7) > (n-9), and 18:0 > 16:0. The presence of different desaturases and elongases suitable for synthesizing (n-3) PUFA was also shown [57]. These results were consistent with earlier data by [58]. Similar results were obtained in experiments with nematodes that had been fed E. coli. The nematode C. elegans accumulated mainly 18:1(n-7) (16%) and only a small amount of 18:1(n-9). The major PUFA were EPA, AA, 18:2(n-6), 20:3(n-6), and 20:4(n-3). The level of bacterial FA, including cyclopropanoic acid, was almost 12% [59]. The results obtained by [60] in a study of FA from mutant C. elegans deficient in PUFA synthesis showed that control wild-type C. elegans contained 27% bacterial FA, 21% 18:1(n-7), 1.7% AA, and 19.1% EPA.
In a shallow-water nematode, bacterial FA varied in a range of 6–12%, PUFA in a range of 32–47%, and the DHA/EPA and 16:0/16:1n7 ratio was >1. Such composition suggests a flagellate-based diet. In reference sediments, the PUFA content was five-fold lower [61]. Experiments on the effect of deep-sea bacterivorous nematodes on detritus [62] showed the presence of 18:1(n-7) > (n-9), 18:0 > 16:0, EPA >> AA, and the absence of DHA in Rhabditis mediterranea. In the deep-sea nematode Deontostoma tridentum from the Chatham Rise, the major unsaturated FA were 16:1(n-7), 18:1(n-9) >> 18:1(n-7), DHA > EPA > AA, and the PUFA content was only ~23%. Moreover, no PUFA were detected in reference sediments [32]. Mixed samples of nematodes from deep-sea sediments of the Southern Ocean [63] showed a low lipid content because these nematodes do not accumulate lipids for energy storage and may feed throughout the year on constantly available food sources. The total PUFA was 33–45% and consisted mainly of FA of planktonic origin. The levels of major PUFA were markedly high (AA, 6–14%; EPA, 7–12%; DHA, 10–20%), while the amount of bacterial odd- and branched-chain FA was low [63]. Abyssal nematodes Desmodora and members of Desmoscolecids from the Southern Ocean were assumed to have a plankton-based diet, as evidenced by diatom biomarkers 16:1(n-7)/16:0 > 1. Furthermore, AA, known as a common FA in foraminifera, was found in high abundances (12.7–23%) in all nematodes. The level of bacterial FA was up to 6.1%. The DHA values reached almost 20% of total FA. It is known that nematodes are capable of producing n-3 and n-6 PUFA, but not DHA, which indicates a selective feeding behavior [64]. The FA composition in the deep-sea nematode Halomonhystera hermesi from the Håkon Mosby mud volcano showed a low level of SFA (9%), monoenoic FA (54%) represented mainly by 16:1(n-7) and 18:1(n-9), and PUFA (37%), mostly 18:2(n-6), DHA, EPA, and AA. It is known that the food sources of H. hermesi lack EPA and DHA, which suggests that this nematode most likely exhibits the ability to synthesize these PUFA [65]. Four nematode species from the abyssal zone in the Kuril Basin (3300–4700 m) demonstrated a high level of bacterial FA (13–22%), phytoplankton FA (31–34%), and monoenoic acids 20:1 and 22:1 (19%). With an odd and branched chain with 18:1(n-7) taken into account, the total bacterial FA content can reach 42–64%. Organic matter derived from chemosynthetic bacteria is one of the carbon sources for macrobenthic nematodes. The monoenoic FA were 18:1(n-9), (5–28%), and 18:1(n-7) (5–13%). The major PUFA were AA (4–13%) and EPA (4–17%); the level of DHA was 1–12% [66].
In conclusion, experiments on free-living nematodes with the use of 13C labeled precursors and a diet with specific FA composition have demonstrated the biosynthesis of C18 and C20 PUFA. A ratio of 18:0 > 16:0 and 18:1(n-7) > 18:1(n-9) independent of diet is characteristic of nematodes. It is also reported for nematodes growth on the E. coli diet. Thus, a ratio of 18:0/16:0 and 18:1(n-7)/18:1(n-9) > 1 can be a characteristic marker of nematodes. For PUFA, the most noticeable characteristics are the lack of docosahexaenoic acid 22:6(n-3), high levels of both AA and EPA, and the presence of different C18, C20, n-3, and n-6 precursors of these acids. Therefore, and vice versa, the occurrence of DHA and 18:1(n-9) in deep-sea nematodes in significant amounts can be linked with the specific predation on meiobenthos. For bacterivorous nematodes, a characteristic feature can be the accumulation of bacterial FA to 10% and more. There is data on the occurrence of desaturase and elongase activities in nematodes leading to different intermediate unsaturated C18 and C20 acids and to eicosapentaenoic acid as a final product [60,67,68].

6. Abyssal Megafauna

6.1. Holothurians

The results of studies on the distribution of invertebrates in the abyssal zone of the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic oceans are presented and compared in an extensive review considering the trophic structure of deep-sea macrobenthos (with sizes larger than 5 mm) [69]. A total of 118 benthic species were analyzed, of which most were Echinodermata (78 species, 66%) represented mainly by Holothuroidea, Ophiuroidea, and Asteroidea. Holothurians made up about 76% and 93% of the megabenthos in terms of abundance and biomass, respectively [70]. In favorable conditions, their biomasses can be exceptionally high, which increases in response to the organic matter flux [70]. Holothurians dominate soft sediments; moreover, they are major phytodetritus consumers and amend reworked sediments for other organisms [71]. There is also data showing that they feed on bacteria or a mixed diet including bacteria and detritus [72,73]. The first report on the FA composition of the abyssal (4400 m) holothurian Scotoplanes theeli was published in 1967 [74]. It stated that the presence of arachidonic acid reaching 21% in TL of the holothurian “has no ready explanation”. Moreover, a remarkable level of odd- and branched-chain acids and a small concentration of DHA were recorded. In East Atlantic abyssal holothurians [75], FAs were identified not fully, but nevertheless, sufficient to show very high concentrations of 23:1 and 24:1 acids (up to 17% and 16%, respectively). AA and EPA amounted to about 15%; bacterial FA, 8%; 20:1 and 22:1 acids, up to 15%. However, 18:1 acids were not identified. The presence of long-chain monoenoic acids 20:1 and 22:1 was explained by feeding on zooplankton remains. An extensive study of deep-sea holothurian lipids has been carried out [76]. The FA composition was found to be subject to significant seasonal variations. In all seasons, lipids were dominated by PUFA, about 50–60%; AA, EPA, and DHA varied widely (12–29%, 6–27%, and 3–12%, respectively); the ratio of 18:1(n-7)/18:1(n-9) was > 1. Odd- and branched-chain FA and 23:1 were not found. At the same time, non-methylene interrupted dienoic acids (NMID), which are also of bacterial origin, were detected at high levels [44]. The authors explained the variations in FA by seasonal detritus input and reproduction. Four species of East Pacific abyssal holothurians showed the presence of PUFA (29–45%), MUFA (28–45%), bacterial FA (3–12%), and DHA (1–8%). In all species, the major PUFA were EPA > AA > DHA. The authors found also uncommon acids 2OH-23:1, 2OH-24:1, and 23:1. This FA composition suggests mixed diets consisting of detritus, bacteria, and zooplankton remains [77]. Holothurians from the West Pacific abyssal plain also showed similar levels of EPA > AA > DHA, odd- and branched-chain FA (3.4–13.9%), and C20 and C22 monoenoic FA. It means a significant input of fresh detritus, bacteria, and zooplankton remains [71]. Of particular note is the presence of an unusual acid, 23:1(n-9), which previously was discovered in shallow-water holothurians [78]. In bathyal holothurians from the Sea of Okhotsk (depth 90–560 m), FA from three groups with different nutrition modes were found: PUFA, up to 64%; MUFA, 20–33%; and bacterial FA, 3.5–6.9% [79]. The first group of suspension feeders had the highest concentration of EPA, 38.8%; the second group of surface feeders had high levels of both AA and DHA; the third group of surface and subsurface feeders was distinguished by the highest levels of AA (up to 39%) and uncommon acids 21:4(n-6) and 23:1(n-9) [79]. Later [80], the holothurian Molpadia musculus, a widespread subsurface deposit feeder, was studied at five Kuril Basin abyssal stations at a depth of 3500 m. The total PLFA was in a range of 34–40%; AA dominated at all stations (up to 26%); EPA and DHA were at a much lower concentration, only ~8 and 1%. The bacterial FA content was almost 10%, with a ratio of 18:1(n-7)/18:1(n-9) > 1. The total of C20:1 and 22:1 was about 5–7%; the levels of uncommon FA 23:1(n-9) and 21:4(n-7) were 7–9% and 1.1–1.3%, respectively. In general, the authors found an insignificant difference in FA composition between stations. Other surface-feeder holothurians from the same station, Psychropotes raripes and Peniagone dubia had much higher values of EPA and DHA concentrations and an EPA/AA ratio. The authors suggested using the ratio EPA/AA and DHA/EPA as an index of the contribution of foraminifera to the diet of deposit feeder [80].

6.2. Sea Stars, Brittle Stars, and Sea Urchins

Sea stars are the second-highest in abundance and importance group of Echinodermata after holothurians in deep-sea bottom habitats [70,81]. Nine species of sea stars from the abyssal zone of the NE Atlantic Ocean were investigated for lipids and FA and divided into three trophic groups on the basis of FA markers [81]. The total PUFA content in all groups was generally high (40–47%); the major FA were EPA and AA, and in all samples, the ratio 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7) was <1. In suspension feeders, the main components were EPA and DHA, characteristic of photosynthetic microplankton; the ratio EPA/AA was 1.7–2.6. Moreover, this group had the highest level of C20:1 and C22:1 acids. In the group of mud ingesters, the main PUFA were AA and EPA, but the EPA/AA ratio was 0.5–0.7, and the total level of bacterial FA, 18:1(n-7), and NMID acids amounted to 7.7–9.5%. The amount of odd- and branched-chain FA was low, 1.1–3%. The group of predator/scavengers had an EPA/AA ratio of 0.8–1.1%. An analysis of FA of the sea star Eremicaster vicinus from the Kuril–Kamchatka Trench (5210 m) showed a PUFA content of 37.8%; MUFA, 42.2%; and odd- and branched-chain acids, 17.35%. The EPA/AA ratio was 1.0; the 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7) ratio, 0.1. Such ratios and the very high concentration of odd-branched chain FA can indicate that E. vicinus feeds on foraminifera, which in turn feeds on bacteria. In addition to common fatty acids, a number of new and uncommon FA: 21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), 22:5(n-5), and 23:4(n-9) earlier discovered in deep-sea foraminifera were also found (Table 1) [20]. Furthermore, a new acid Δ5,8,11,14,17,20, 22:6 or 22:6(n-2), related to the ω2 family, was also detected. Earlier acids 21:5(n-2) and 17:5(n-2) were tentatively identified in lipids of the amphipod Pontoporeia femorata, which had a remarkable level (up to 53%) of odd-chain FA [48]. The acid 21:6(n-2), another member of the ω2 family, was detected in thraustochytrids [51]. Unusual FA 21:4(n-7) 5% and minor 22:4(n-8) and 22:5(n-5) were found in abyssal Asteroidea [21].
Information on FA of deep-sea ophiuroids is provided only in a few papers [77]. Two species of brittle stars from the abyssal zone of the Northeast Pacific had a high EPA/AA ratio (3.4–4.2) and a total level of C20 monoenoic FA of 17–19%. Ophiuroids are known to be opportunistic feeders consuming both phytodetritus and animal-derived matter, including foraminifera and nematodes [82]. However, the high level of C20 monoenoic acids suggests feeding on zooplankton remains. Deep-sea ophiurans showed the presence of an uncommon very long-chain PUFA 24:6(n-3) (2.3–10.3%) and an uncharacterized C26 PUFA (10.6–0.7%) [77]. Subsequently, these acids were found in bathyal brittle stars and were characterized as a family of C26 PUFA: 26:7(n-3), 26:6(n-3), 26:6(n-6), and 26:5(n-3) [83]. Moreover, high levels of 24:6(n-3) and 26:6(n-3) PUFA (constituting 20.5% and 14.5% of total FA) were found in brittle stars from the abyssal zone off the Kuril Islands [21]. An analysis of one brittle star species (among many other invertebrates), Ophiura leptostenia, from the Sea of Japan [84] showed the results generally consistent with data of [77]. The EPA/AA ratio was high, 11.4 and 16.4% at two stations; the ratio 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7) was 1.6 and 2.1, respectively. The total of C20 MUFA was 10% at both stations. The concentration of a “marker” FA for brittle stars, 24:6(n-3), was 13.7 and 4.9%, respectively. The second marker FA 26:7(n-3) probably got into the proportion of “other”, 8.5%. The low level of bacterial acids, 18:1(n-7), and the high EPA/AA and EPA/DHA ratios indicate that brittle stars feed mainly on detritus and zooplankton [84]. In reference sediments (depth 2500 m), noticeable levels of PUFA 18:2(n-6) (5–11%), EPA (0.9–6%), AA (0.3–2%), DHA (0.3–0.9%), and 18:1(n-9) as a major MUFA (17%) were found. The concentration of odd- and branched-chain FA was 7.9%. The presence of C18, C20, and C22 PUFA (up to 18%) in significant amounts in sediments allows an assumption about their important role in the diet of surface feeders [84].
The prevalence of eicosapentaenoic acid as major PUFA, characteristic for fresh detritus, over arachidonic acid, 18:1(n-7) vs. 18:1(n-9), the low concentration of bacterial odd- and branched-chain FA, and the high level of C20 monoenoic acids indicate a mixed detritus/-zooplankton diet. Uncommon 24:6(n-3) and 26:7(n-3) acids can be marker FA for deep-sea brittle stars.
Lipids and FA of shallow-water sea urchins are well known. For example [85], TL and FA data were obtained for the common sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis fed different diets. Most PUFA were C18 and C20 acids derived from macroalgae. The FA found only in sea urchins (absent from their diet) were 20:1n-9, 20:1n-7, 22:1n-9, and several NMID (20:2Δ5,11; 20:2Δ5,13; 20:2Δ5,11; and 20:2Δ5,13). Data on FA of deep-sea sea urchins is limited. An analysis of FA of Kamptosoma abyssale from the Kuril–Kamchatka Trench (5210 m) showed a PUFA level of 44.4%, equal concentrations of EPA and AA (17%), and a small level of DHA [22]. The total of isomers C20:1 was 22%, with the major acid being 20:1(n-5), and the NMID acids content being low. The presence of uncommon FA characteristic of foraminifera—21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), 23:4(n-9), and 22:5(n-5)—found in the sample, allows an assumption that K. abyssale feed on foraminifera [22]. An investigation of FA of sea urchins (Echinus affinus) collected from a depth of 2700 m off the deep-sea dumping site located 185 km southeast of the New Jersey coast showed a high level of PUFA of about 70% with equivalent EPA and AA contents [86]. The level of DHA was low (2.7%), as well as the level of bacterial odd- and branched-chain FA (3.4%) with NMID acids, which are also of bacterial origin, with the total level being 7.6%. The 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7) ratio was almost 1. The authors explained the relatively high concentration of AA by possible biosynthesis from 18:2(n-6).

6.3. Mollusks

A comparative study of 12 species of abyssal mollusks (gastropods, bivalves, and scaphopods) from the Kuril–Kamchatka Trench was carried out by [87]. First, they showed that the FA composition in most of them depends on feeding type, rather than on taxonomic classification. On the basis of the FA profile, the studied mollusks were clustered into three groups. Group 1 included species with a high level of AA and bacterial FA including 18:1(n-7). The combination of FA found in this group is typical of organisms feeding on foraminifera [31]. Group 2 mollusks feed mainly on sediment surface layers and, therefore, they contained the highest amount of DHA, while EPA/AA was >1. DHA is highly conserved through the food chain and often increases towards higher trophic levels [88]. This could be indicative of carnivorous feeding. Group 3 contained a high level of EPA, 22:5(n-3) and 20:1(n-7). Two gastropod species are known to exhibit carnivorous/scavenging feeding strategies. The significant accumulation of 22:5(n-3) cannot be easily explained [87]. The detection of up to 10% of uncommon acid 21:4(n-7), probably of microbial origin in most mollusks studied deserves special mention [89]. An FA analysis of particulate organic matter (POM) from the reference bottom-water interface revealed a significant amount of 16:1(n-7), 18:1(n-9), 18:1(n-7), whereas no appreciable amount of PUFA, except 18:2(n-6), were present in the samples [87].

6.4. Polychaetes

In lipids of three polychaete species from the abyssal zone of the northeastern Pacific Ocean, the levels of PUFA were 35–45%, with major components being EPA, AA, and C22 PUFA [90]. Bacterial odd- and branched-chain FA contents were 5–8%, but the levels of NMID, also of bacterial origin, were 8–13%. Thus, the total content of bacterial acids was very high, up to 20%. C20 and C22 MUFA were also present at a noticeable level, 13–19%. The authors assumed the consumption of phytodetritus from the sediment surface and zooplankton-derived matter [90]. Extensive studies of 39 polychaete species from 18 families and reference sediments were performed by [30] on deep-sea samples from the Southern Ocean. In POM and sediment samples, the major FA were monoenoic and saturated. The levels of major PUFA, DHA, EPA, AA, and docosapentaenoic 22:5(n-3), varying from 1 to 4% in POM and 1–3% in sediments. In polychaetes, the major FA were monoenoic 18:1(n-7), 18:1(n-9), and 20:1(n-11) and PUFA 20:5(n-3), 22:6(n-3), 22:5(n-3), and 20:4(n-6). Polychaetes’ food sources such as fresh diatom remains, foraminifera, and zooplankton were identified using marker acids. Four polychaete species from the abyssal zone of the Kuril Basin, Sea of Okhotsk, were divided into two groups on the basis of 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7), EPA/AA, and DHA/EPA ratios [80]. Surface deposit feeders had an EPA/AA ratio of 0.7 and an 18:1(n-9)/18:1(n-7) ratio of 0.2. In the second group of surface deposit feeders, feeding in the most superficial layer of bottom sediments, these ratios were 2 and 1, respectively. The first group, besides higher levels of AA and 18:1(n-7), had two rare acids, 22:4(n-8) and 22:5(n-5), which had earlier been discovered in agglutinated foraminifera from the Kuril Basin [20]. These data point to foraminifera’s contribution to the diet of polychaetes. The second group had the FA characteristic of fresh detritus in the diet.

7. Discussion: Sources of PUFA in Abyssal Ecosystems

In deep-sea ecosystems exposed to a constantly low temperature and extremely high hydrostatic pressure, very high levels of essential PUFA (EPA, DHA, and AA) are required for providing normal functions of cell membranes [14,15,91,92,93]. It is generally recognized that abyssal ecosystems are fueled by the flux of POM from the ocean’s photosynthesis zone. As the organic matter sinks from the euphotic to the abyssal zone, the percentage of PUFA is reduced, and the trophic value of organic matter decreases [8,9,26,27,28,32,94,95,96]. However, there are reports about noticeable, up to 4–10%, concentrations of PUFA in sediments of the Southern Ocean, Kuril Basin, and Venezuela Basin deep-sea stations [29,30,31,50,93]. Such data point out that detritus becomes a source of essential PUFA for the megafauna, at least periodically. As a rule, high levels of EPA and DHA in deep-sea invertebrates are associated with detritus containing marked amounts of these acids.
Bacteria, which are actually present at all depths and constitute the major part of benthic biomass (11–87%), can be another possible source of essential PUFA [26]. Barophilic and psychrophilic bacteria are capable of producing EPA or DHA, while some strains produce both these acids, but not arachidonic acid [91,92,93]. It is difficult to access the input of barophilic bacteria to the sediment PUFA pool. All data on the FA composition of barophilic bacteria were obtained from strains grown under optimum laboratory conditions. According to most data, the PUFA content of phospholipids in sediments is low or absent. If PUFA are present, arachidonic acid, being not essential for barophilic bacteria, is also present, as well as EPA and DHA [28,29,30,31,97]. It is likely that psychrophilic and barophilic bacteria produce these PUFA in controlled laboratory conditions that are much more favorable than in natural habitats. Thus, to assess the input of bacterial PUFA to abyssal ecosystems, additional studies are needed.
The key role of foraminifera in marine food chains, as organisms recovering energy from low-value organic debris and bacteria, was formulated in 1970 [98]. Deep-sea foraminifera ingest planktonic and other detritus, sediment particles, bacteria, and more refractory organic matter, whereas some species can be specialized predators [4,5,6,7,34,38]. In turn, foraminifera are utilized as food by larger organisms and, therefore, they support the trophic upgrade of the ecosystem. Foraminifera constitute the major part of the deep-sea benthic community with relative biomass in the top layer of sediments reaching nearly 50% [2] and are comparable in biomass to the metazoan meiofauna [33,34]. It means that foraminifera plays a significant role in deep-sea food webs and carbon cycles. The ability of marine protists to synthesize PUFA is commonly recognized [99,100,101]. The most significant feature of foraminifera is the capability of synthesizing arachidonic acid under incubation with a 13C labeled diatom, Thalassiosira weisflogii [45]. A remarkable (10-fold) increase in the AA content and a less pronounced increase in 18:1(n-7) were recorded. Similar, but less noticeable results were reported for the common benthic foraminifera Ammonia tepida fed a diatom diet [46]. Both studies made conclusions that foraminifera can synthesize arachidonic acid and are possibly the major source of this acid in bottom ecosystems. An analysis of FA from abyssal foraminifera showed their dependence on a food source, a high PUFA content (up to 54%), and arachidonic acid as a major component, up to 28%. Moreover, a characteristic feature was the presence of odd- and branched-chain acids, NMID, and cis-vaccenic acid, all of bacterial origin. Thus, arachidonic acid is synthesized by foraminifera and then can be retained in the food chain. A detailed FA analysis using GC and GC–MS made it possible to detect 10 new acids in foraminifera, essentially monoenoic and dienoic ones with a first double bond at Δ4 and Δ7 positions (Table 1). Furthermore, two new PUFA were found, identified as 22:4(n-8) and 24:4(n-9), which form a homological sequence with arachidonic acids: 21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), and 23:4(n-9) [20]. Subsequently, two more homological series were identified: 20:3(n-5), 22:3(n-5), and 22:5(n-5); 22:4(n-6): 23:4(n-7), 24:4(n-8), and 25:4(n-9) [21]. Some of these acids were detected in members of megafauna dwelling in the surface and subsurface layers of abyssal sediments.
Another source of PUFA in deep-sea habitats is nematodes. Members of this phylum inhabit a broad range of environments and feed on diverse foods including bacteria, microalgae, fungi, small animals, fecal pellets, and dead organisms. Nematodes are usually small-sized organisms, for which it is difficult to obtain biomass sufficient for FA composition analysis on a species/genus level. Free-living marine nematodes are important and abundant members of the meiobenthos. Some experts estimate the total number of nematode species at around ~1 million [102]. The most important characteristic feature of nematodes is the de novo biosynthesis of a variety of PUFA from saturated and monoenoic acids [55,56,57,58,59,60,67,68]. It is worth noting that in Caenorhabditis elegans, grown on a pure culture of the bacterium E. coli, the major PUFA were EPA, AA, 18:2(n-6), 20:3(n-6), and 20:4(n-3), but not docosahexaenoic acid [59]. In contrast, the abyssal nematode Halomonhystera hermesi from the Håkon Mosby mud volcano, feeding on diets without EPA and DHA, nevertheless, accumulate 37% PUFA, mainly 18:2(n-6), DHA, EPA, and AA [65]. It means that nematodes are capable of producing DHA as well. A comparison between the FA compositions of nematodes from different stations has demonstrated the presence of FA characteristic of phytoplankton and zooplankton detritus, bacteria, and also FA characteristic of predators preying on meiobenthos. It can be assumed that nematodes, depending on available food supply, can extract PUFA from phyto- and zooplankton detritus or synthesize necessary PUFA from more available saturated and monoenoic acids, thus, upgrading the PUFA pool in sediments. Since the life span of free-living adult Rhabdias bufonis is only several days [103], they can significantly improve the nutritional value of sediments for various sediment-dwellers through bioturbation and PUFA biosynthesis.

8. Conclusions

In deep-sea ecosystems, there exist two major routes of PUFA entry: detritus flux from the photosynthesis zone and heterotrophic production by metazoans and, possibly, prokaryotes. The most important source of PUFA production is heterotrophic Protista which have a high biomass in deep-sea habitats and are capable of de novo synthesis of essential FA from low-quality detritus and bacteria [33,34,35]. Major representatives of Protista in the abyssal zone are foraminifera. The PUFA compositions of foraminifera from different places are always dominated by arachidonic acid. However, the level of odd- and branched-chain acids and 18:1(n-7) characteristic of bacteria can reach 33% in foraminifer’s phospholipids. One more consequence of feeding on bacteria can be the synthesis of new and uncommon fatty acids which can be markers of foraminifera in the further food chain.
The involvement of nematodes in the deep-sea PUFA pool is even more difficult to assess because they have no specific marker acids. However, nematodes were capable of synthesizing PUFA on bacterial feed in laboratory experiments, as well as in deep-sea sediments without any sources of PUFA. Having a short life span and forming significant biomass, nematodes undoubtedly improve the nutritional value of sediments for meiobenthos.
All studies on FA compositions of the major groups of deep-sea megafauna such as Echinodermata (holothurians, sea stars, sea urchins, and brittle stars), Mollusca (gastropods, bivalves, and scaphopods), and Polychaeta showed high levels of PUFA (40–50%). It seems that their FA compositions depend rather on the type of food supply than on taxonomic position. Nevertheless, some taxa have unusual acids or concentrations of common FA. Concentrations of AA, EPA, DHA, and some other polyenoic acids vary in a wide range. Based on concentrations of different PUFA or ratios of them, and also on the presence of FA characteristics for bacteria or zooplankton, it is possible to judge what type of food supply is essential for certain taxa.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Russian Federation (grant 13.1902.21.0012 for ID, contract No 075-15-2020-796).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

FAFatty acid(s)
FAMEFatty acid methyl ester(s)
SFASaturated FA
MUFAMonounsaturated FA: FA with 1 double bond
NMIDNon-methylene interrupted dienoic FA
PUFAPolyunsaturated FA: FA with 2 or more double bonds
LCFALong-chain FA: FA with 24 or more carbon atoms
C18, C20, C22Refers to FA with the number of carbons in a molecule, e.g., C18 polyenoic FA
Bacterial FAOdd and branched-chain FA, e.g., 15:0, i-17:0

References

  1. Bruun, A.F. Deep sea and abyssal depths. Geol. Soc. America Memoir. 1957, 67, 641–672. [Google Scholar]
  2. Smith, C.R.; De Leo, F.C.; Bernardino, A.F.; Sweetman, A.K.; Arbizu, P.M. Abyssal food limitation, ecosystem structure and climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thistle, D. The Deep-Sea Floor: An Overview; Ecosystems of the World; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Chapter 2; pp. 5–37. [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith, C.; Demopoulos, A. The Deep Pacific Ocean Floor; Ecosystems of the World; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Chapter 6; Volume 27, pp. 179–218. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowe, G.T.; Gardner, W. Sedimentation rates in the slope water of the northwest Atlantic Ocean measured directly with sediment traps. J. Mar. Res. 1979, 37, 581–600. [Google Scholar]
  6. Honjo, S.; Dymond, J.; Collier, R.; Manganini, S.J. Export production of particles to the interior of equatorial Pacific Ocean during the 1992 EqPac experiment. Deep-Sea Res. II 1995, 42, 831–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smith, C.R.; Berelson, W.; Demaster, D.J.; Dobbs, F.C.; Hammond, D.; Hoover, D.J.; Pope, R.H.; Stephens, M. Latitudinal variations in benthic processes in the abyssal equatorial Pacific: Control by biogenic particle flux. Deep-Sea Res. II 1997, 44, 2295–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wakeham, S.G.; Hedges, J.I.; Lee, C.; Peterson, M.L.; Hernes, P.J. Compositions and transport of lipid biomarkers through the water column and surficial sediments of the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II 1997, 44, 2131–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kiriakoulakis, K.; Stutt, E.; Rowland, S.J.; Vangriesheim, A.; Lampitt, R.S.; Wolff, G.A. Controls on the organic chemical composition of settling particles in the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 2001, 50, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Azam, F.; Fenchel, T.; Field, J.G.; Gray, J.S.; Meyer-Reil, L.A.; Thingstad, F. The ecological role of water column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1983, 10, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Parrish, C.C. Essential Fatty Acids in Aquatic Food Webs. In Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems; Arts, M.T., Brett, M.T., Kainz, M.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 309–326. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell, M.V.; Tocher, D.R. Biosynthesis of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Aquatic Ecosystems: General Pathways and New Directions. In Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems; Arts, M.T., Brett, M.T., Kainz, M.J., Eds.; Springer: The Netherlands, Germany, 2008; pp. 211–236. [Google Scholar]
  13. Monroig, Ó.; Tocher, D.R.; Navarro, J.C. Biosynthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids in marine invertebrates: Recent advances in molecular mechanisms. Mar Drugs. 2013, 11, 3998–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sinensky, M. Homeoviscous adaptation: A homeostatic process that regulates the viscosity of the membrane lipids in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1974, 71, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cossins, A.R.; Macdonald, A.G. Homeoviscous adaptation under pressure. III. The fatty acid composition of liver mitochondrial phospholipids of deep-sea fish. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1986, 860, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Long, E.F.; Yayanos, A.A. Adaptation of the membrane lipids of a deep-sea bacterium to changes in hydrostatic pressure. Science 1985, 228, 1101–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stránsky, K.; Jursik, T.; Vitek, A. Standard equivalent chain length values of monoenic and polyenic (methylene interrupted) fatty acids. J. High Resolut. Chrom. 1997, 20, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sebedio, J.L.; Ackman, R.G. Calculation of retention data for some accessible C20 isomeric cis-unsaturated fatty acids. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1982, 20, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wolff, R.L.; Christie, W.W. Structures, practical sources (gymnosperm seeds), gas-liquid chromatographic data (equivalent chain lengths), and mass spectrometric characteristics of all-cis ∆5-olefinic acids. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2002, 104, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kharlamenko, V.I.; Svetashev, V.I.; Tarasova, T.S. New and uncommon fatty acids in lipids of deep-sea foraminifera. Lipids 2017, 52, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kharlamenko, V.I.; Odintsova, N.A. Unusual methylene-interrupted polyunsaturated fatty acids of abyssal and hadal invertebrates. Progr. Oceanogr. 2019, 178, 102132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Svetashev, V.I.; Kharlamenko, V.I. Fatty Acids of Abyssal Echinodermata, the Sea Star Eremicaster vicinus and the Sea Urchin Kamptosoma abyssale: A New Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Detected, 22:6(n-2). Lipids 2020, 55, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Svetashev, V.I. Mild method for preparation of 4,4-dimethyloxazoline derivatives of polyunsaturated fatty acids for GC–MS. Lipids 2011, 46, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Christie, W.W. Mass Spectrometry of Fatty Acid Derivatives. The LipidWeb. Available online: http://lipidhome.co.uk/ms/masspec.html (accessed on 22 November 2016).
  25. Svetashev, V.I.; Imbs, A.B. Isomerization of octadecapentaenoic acid (18:5n-3) in algal lipid samples under derivatization for GC and GC-MS analysis. J. Phycol. 2014, 50, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rowe, G.; Subuet, M.; Deming, J.; Khripounoff, A.; Tietjen, J.; Macko, S.; Theroux, R. ‘Total’ sediment biomass and preliminary estimates of organic carbon residence time in deep-sea benthos. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1991, 79, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fowler, S.W.; Knauer, G.A. Role of Large Particles in the Transport of Elements and Organic Compounds Through the Oceanic Water Column. Prog. Oceanog. 1986, 16, 147–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pinturier-Geiss, L.; Laureillard, J.; Riaux-Gobin, C.; Fillaux, J.; Saliot, A. Lipids and pigments in deep-sea surface sediments and interfacial particles from the Western Crozet Basin. Mar. Chem. 2001, 75, 249–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Laureillard, J.; Méjanelle, L.; Sibuet, M. Use of lipids to study the trophic ecology of deep-sea xenophyophores. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 270, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Würzberg, L.; Peters, J.; Schuller, M.; Brandt, A. Diet insights of deep-sea polychaetes derived from fatty acid analyses. Deep-Sea Res. Part II—Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2011, 58, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Würzberg, L.; Peters, J.; Brandt, A. Fatty acid patterns of Southern Ocean shelf and deep sea peracarid crustaceans and a possible food source, foraminiferans. Deep-Sea Res. Part II—Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2011, 58, 2027–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Leduc, D.; Brown, J.C.S.; Bury, S.J.; Lörz, A.-N. High intraspecific variability in the diet of a deep-sea nematode: Stable isotope and fatty acid analyses of Deontostoma tridentum on Chatham Rise, Southwest Pacific. Deep Sea Res. Part I 2015, 97, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bernhard, J.M.; Sen Gupta, D.K.; Baguley, J.G. Benthic foraminifera living in Gulf of Mexico bathyal and abyssal sediments: Community analysis and comparison to metazoan meiofaunal biomass and density. Deep-Sea Res. II 2008, 55, 2617–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gooday, A.J.; Levin, L.A.; Linke, P.; Heeger, T. The Role of Benthic Foraminifera in Deep-Sea Food Webs and Carbon Cycling. In Deep-Sea Food Chains and the Global Carbon Cycle; Rowe, G.T., Pariente, V., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 63–91. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gooday, A.J.; Schoenle, A.; Dolan, J.R.; Arndt, H. Protist diversity and function in the dark ocean—Challenging the paradigms of deep-sea ecology with special emphasis on foraminiferans and naked protists. Eur. J. Protistol. 2020, 75, 125721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gooday, A.J.; Nomaki, H.; Kitazato, H. Modern deep-sea benthic foraminifera: A brief review of their morphology-based biodiversity and trophic diversity. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Public. 2008, 303, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moodley, L.; Middelburg, J.J.; Boschker, H.T.S.; Duineveld, G.C.A.; Pel, R.; Herman, P.M.J.; Heip, C.H.R. Bacteria and foraminifera: Key players in a short-term deep-sea benthic response to phytodetritus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 236, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Suhr, S.B.; Stephen, P.; Alexander, S.P.; Gooday, A.J.; Pond, D.W.; Bowser, S.S. Trophic modes of large Antarctic Foraminifera: Roles of carnivory, omnivory, and detritivory. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 371, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Goldstein, S.T.; Corliss, B.H. Deposit feeding in selected deep-sea and shallow-water benthic foraminifera. Deep-Sea Res. I 1994, 41, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nomaki, N.; Ogawa, N.O.; Ohkouchi, N.; Suga, H.; Toyofuku, T.; Shimanaga, M.; Nakatsuka, T.; Kitazato, H. Benthic foraminifera as trophic links between phytodetritus and benthic metazoans: Carbon and nitrogen isotopic evidence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 357, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Haynert, K.; Gluderer, F.; Pollierer, M.M.; Scheu, S.; Wehrmann, A. Food Spectrum and Habitat-Specific Diets of Benthic Foraminifera from the Wadden Sea—A Fatty Acid Biomarker Approach. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 510288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gooday, A.J.; Pond, D.W.; Bowser, S.S. Ecology and nutrition of the large agglutinated foraminiferan Bathysiphon capillare in the bathyal NE Atlantic: Distribution within the sediment profile and lipid biomarker composition. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 245, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhukova, N.V. The pathway of the biosynthesis of non-methylene-interrupted dienoic fatty acids in molluscs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1991, 100B, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fullarton, J.G.; Dando, P.R.; Sargent, J.R.; Southward, A.J.; Southward, E.C. Fatty acids of hydrothermal vent Ridgeia piscesae and inshore bivalves containing symbiotic bacteria. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1995, 75, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Larkin, K.E.; Gooday, A.J.; Woulds, C.; Jeffreys, R.; Schwartz, M.; Cowie, G.; Whitcraft, C.; Levin, L.; Dick, J.R.; Pond, D.W. Uptake of algal carbon and the synthesis of an “essential” fatty acid by Uvigerina ex. gr. semiornata (Foraminifera) within the Pakistan margin oxygen minimum zone: Evidence from fatty acid biomarker and 13C tracer experiments. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 3738–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. LeKieffre, C.; Spangenberg, J.E.; Mabilleau, G.; Escrig, S.; Meibom, A.; Geslin, E. Surviving anoxia in marine sediments: The metabolic response of ubiquitous benthic foraminifera (Ammonia tepida). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Suhr, S.B.; Pond, D.W.; Gooday, A.J.; Smith, C.R. Selective feeding by benthic foraminifera on phytodetritus on the western Antarctic Peninsula shelf: Evidence from fatty acid biomarker analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003, 262, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Paradis, M.; Ackman, R. Localization of a marine source of odd chain-length fatty acids I: The amphipod Pontoporeia femorata (Kröyer). Lipids 1976, 11, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chang, K.J.L.; Mansour, M.P.; Dunstan, G.A.; Blackburn, S.I.; Koutoulis, A.; Nichols, P.D. Odd-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in thraustochytrids. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1460–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kharlamenko, V.I. Abyssal foraminifera as the main source of rare and new polyunsaturated fatty acids in deep-sea ecosystems. Deep-Sea Res. Part II 2018, 154, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ramirez-Llodra, E.; Brandt, A.; Danovaro, R.; De Mol, B.; Escobar, E.; German, C.R.; Levin, L.A.; Martínez Arbizu, P.; Menot, L.; Buhl-Mortensen, P.; et al. Deep, diverse and definitely different: Unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem. Biogeosciences. 2010, 7, 2851–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Vincx, M.; Bett, B.J.; Dinet, A.; Ferrero, T.; Gooday, A.J.; Lambshead, P.J.D.; Pfannkuche, O.; Soltwedel, T.; Vanreusel, A. Meiobenthos of the Deep Northeast Atlantic. Adv. Mar. Biol. 1994, 30, 1–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Moens, T.; Braeckman, U.; Derycke, S.; Fonseca, G.; Gallucci, F.; Gingold, R.; Guilini, K.; Ingels, J.; Leduc, D.; Vanaverbeke, J.; et al. Ecology of free-living marine nematodes. In Handbook of Zoology; Nematoda, A., Ed.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2014; Volume 3, pp. 109–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tchesunov, A.V.; Ingels, J.; Popova, E.V. Marine free-living nematodes associated with symbiotic bacteria in deep-sea canyons of north-east Atlantic Ocean. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 2012, 92, 1257–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rothstein, M.; Gotz, P. Biosynthesis of Fatty Acids in the Free-living Nematode, Turbatrix aceti. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 126, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hutzell, P.A.; Krusberg, L.R. Fatty acid compositions of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1982, 73B, 517–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schlechtriem, C.; Tocher, D.R.; Dick, J.; Becker, K. Incorporation and metabolism of fatty acids by desaturation and elongation in the nematode, Panagrellus redivivus. Nematology 2004, 6, 783–795. [Google Scholar]
  58. Fodor, A.; Dey, I.; Farkas, T.; Chitwood, D.J. Effects of Temperature and Dietary Lipids on Phospholipid Fatty Acids and Membrane Fluidity in Steinernema carpocapsae. J. Nematol. 1994, 26, 278–285. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tanaka, T.; Ikita, K.; Ashida, T.; Motoyama, Y.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Satouchi, K. Effects of Growth Temperature on the Fatty Acid Composition of the Free-Living Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Lipids 1996, 31, 1173–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Watts, J.L.; Browse, J. Genetic dissection of polyunsaturated fatty acid synthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 5854–5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Braeckman, U.; Provoost, P.; Sabbe, K.; Soetaert, K.; Middelburg, J.J.; Vincx, M.; Vanaverbeke, J. Temporal dynamics in a shallow coastal benthic food web: Insights from fatty acid biomarkers and their stable isotopes. Mar. Environ. Res. 2015, 108, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Leduc, D.; Probert, P.K. The effect of bacterivorous nematodes on detritus incorporation by macrofaunal detritivores: A study using stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2009, 371, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Guilini, K.; Veit-Köhler, G.; De Troch, M.; Van Gansbeke, D.; Vanreusel, A. Latitudinal and temporal variability in the community structure and fatty acid composition of deep-sea nematodes in the Southern Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 2013, 110, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lins, L.; da Silva, M.C.; Hauquier, F.; Esteves, A.M.; Vanreusel, A. Nematode community composition and feeding shaped by contrasting productivity regimes in the Southern Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 2015, 134, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Van Campenhout, J.; Vanreusel, A. Closely related intertidal and deep-sea Halomonhystera species have distinct fatty acid compositions. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2016, 70, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Mordukhovich, V.V.; Kiyashko, S.I.; Kharlamenko, V.I.; Fadeeva, N.P. Determination of food sources for nematodes in the Kuril Basin and eastern slope of the Kuril Islands by stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2018, 154, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhou, X.-R.; Green, A.G.; Singh, S.P. Caenorhabditis elegans Δ12-Desaturase FAT-2 is a bifunctional desaturase able to desaturate a diverse range of fatty acid substrates at the Δ12 and Δ15 positions. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 43644–43650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Kabeya, N.; Fonseca, M.M.; Ferrier, D.E.K.; Navarro, J.C.; Bay, L.K.; Francis, D.S.; Tocher, D.R.; Castro, L.F.C.; Monroig, O. Genes for de novo biosynthesis of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are widespread in animals. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar6849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Sokolova, M.N. Trophic Structure of Abyssal Macrobenthos. Adv. Mar. Biol. 1992, 32, 427–525. [Google Scholar]
  70. Billett, D.S.M.; Bett, B.J.; Rice, A.L.; Thurston, M.H.; Galeron, J.; Sibuet, M.; Wolff, G.A. Long-term change in the megabenthos of the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (NE Atlantic). Prog. Oceanogr. 2001, 50, 325–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Amaro, A.; Danovaro, R.; Matsui, Y.; Eugenio Rastelli, E.; George, A.; Wolff, G.A.; Nomaki, H. Possible links between holothurian lipid compositions and differences in organic matter (OM) supply at the western Pacific abyssal plains. Deep-Sea Res. Part I 2019, 152, 103085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Amaro, T.; Bianchelli, S.; Billett, D.S.M.; Cunha, M.R.; Pusceddu, A.; Danovaro, R. The trophic biology of the holothurian Molpadia musculus: Implications for organic matter cycling and ecosystem functioning in a deep submarine canyon. Biogeosciences 2010, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Amaro, T.; Luna, G.M.; Danovaro, R.; Billett, D.S.M.; Cunha, M.R. High prokaryotic biodiversity associated with gut contents of the holothurian Molpadia musculus from the Nazaré Canyon (NE Atlantic). Deep-Sea Res. I 2012, 63, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lewis, R.W. Fatty Acid Composition of Some Marine Animals from Various Depths. J. Fish. Res. 1967, 24, 1101–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ginger, M.L.; Santos, V.L.C.S.; Wolff, G.A. A preliminary investigation of the lipids of abyssal holothurians from the north-East Atlantic Ocean. J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecol. 2000, 80, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hudson, I.R.; Pond, D.W.; Billett, D.S.M.; Tyler, P.A.; Lampitt, R.S.; Wolff, G.A. Temporal variations in fatty acid composition of deep-sea holothurians: Evidence of bentho-pelagic coupling. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004, 281, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Drazen, J.C.; Phleger, C.F.; Guest, M.A.; Nichols, P.D. Lipid, sterols and fatty acid composition of holothurians and ophiuroids from the north-East Pacific Ocean: Food web implications. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. 2008, 151, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kaneniwa, M.; Itabashi, Y.; Endo, S.; Takagi, T. Fatty acids in Holothuroidea: Occurrence of cis-14- tricosenoic acid. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1986, 84B, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kharlamenko, V.I.; Stepanov, V.G.; Borisovets, E.E.; Kiyashko, S.I.; Svetashev, V.I. The fatty acid composition and nutrition of deep-sea holothurians from the Sea of Okhotsk. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2015, 41, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kharlamenko, V.I.; Maiorova, A.S.; Ermolenko, E.V. Fatty acid composition as an indicator of the trophic position of abyssal megabenthic deposit feeders in the Kuril Basin of the Sea of Okhotsk. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2018, 154, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Howell, K.L.; Pond, D.W.; Billett, D.S.M.; Tyler, P.A. Feeding ecology of deep-sea seastars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): A fatty-acid biomarker approach. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003, 255, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Pearson, M.; Gage, J.D. Diets of some deep-sea brittle stars in the Rockall Trough. Mar. Biol. 1984, 82, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Svetashev, V.I.; Kharlamenko, V.I. Occurrence of hexacosapolyenoic acids 26:7(n-3), 26:6(n-3), 26:6(n-6) and 26:5 (n-3) in deep sea brittle stars from near the Kuril Islands. Lipids 2015, 50, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kiyashko, S.I.; Kharlamenko, V.I.; Sanamyan, K.; Alalykina, A.L.; Würzberg, L. Trophic structure of the abyssal benthic community in the Sea of Japan inferred from stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 500, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kelly, J.R.; Scheibling, R.E.; Iverson, S.J.; Gagnon, P. Fatty acid profiles in the gonads of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis on natural algal diets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 373, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Rieley, G.; Van Dovel, C.L.; Eglinton, G. Fatty acids as sensitive tracers of sewage sludge carbon in a deep-sea ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kharlamenko, V.I.; Würzberg, L.; Peters, J.; Borisovets, E.E. Fatty acid compositions and trophic relationships of shelled molluscs from the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench and the adjacent abyssal plain. Deep-Sea Res. II 2015, 111, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dalsgaard, J.; St. John, M.; Kattner, G.; Muller-Navarra, D.; Hagen, W. Fatty acid trophic markers in the pelagic marine environment. Adv. Mar. Biol. 2003, 46, 225–340. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Vasskog, T.; Andersen, J.H.; Hansen, E.; Svenson, J. Characterization and cytotoxicity studies of the rare 21:4n-7 acid and other polyunsaturated fatty acids from the marine Opisthobranch Scaphander lignarius, isolated using bioassay guided fractionation. Mar. Drugs. 2012, 10, 2676–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Drazen, J.C.; Phleger, C.F.; Guest, M.A.; Nichols, P.D. Lipid, sterols and fatty acids of abyssal polychaetes, crustaceans, and a cnidarian from the northeast Pacific Ocean: Food web implications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008, 372, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wirsen, C.O.; Jannasch, H.W.; Wakeham, S.G.; Canuel, E.A. Membrane Lipids of a Psychrophilic and Barophilic Deep-sea Bacterium. Curr. Microbiol. 1987, 14, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Fang, J.; Chan, O.; Kato, C.; Sato, T.; Peeples, T.; Niggemeyer, K. Phospholipid FA of Piezophilic Bacteria from the Deep Sea. Lipids 2003, 38, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. De Long, E.F.; Yayanos, A.A. Biochemical function and ecological significance of novel bacterial lipids in deep-sea procaryotes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 51, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Santos, V.; Billett, D.S.M.; Rice, A.L.; Wolff, G.A. Organic matter in deep-sea sediments from the Porcupine Abyssal Plain in the north-east Atlantic Ocean. I-Lipids. Deep-Sea Res. I 1994, 41, 787–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guezennec, J.; Fiala-Medioni, A. Bacterial abundance and diversity in the Barbados Trench determined by phospholipid analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1996, 19, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Baird, B.H.; White, D.C. Biomass and community structure of the abyssal microbiota determined from the ester-linked phospholipids recovered from Venezuela Basin and Puerto Rico Trench sediments. Mar. Geol. 1985, 68, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mills, C.T.; Dias, R.F.; Graham, D.; Mandernack, K.W. Determination of phospholipid fatty acid structures and stable carbon isotope compositions of deep-sea sediments of the Northwest Pacific, ODP site 1179. Mar. Chem. 2006, 98, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lipps, J.H.; Valentine, J.W. The role of Foraminifera in the trophic structure of marine communities. Lethaia 1970, 3, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhukova, N.V.; Kharlamenko, V.I. Sources of essential fatty acids in the marine microbial loop. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 1999, 17, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Desvilettes, C.; Bec, A. Formation and Transfer of Fatty Acids in Aquatic Microbial Food Webs: Role of Heterotrophic Protists. In Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems; Kainz, M., Brett, M.T., Arts, M.T., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  101. Veloza, A.J.; Chu, F.-L.E.; Tang, K.W. Trophic modification of essential fatty acids by heterotrophic protists and its effects on the fatty acid composition of the copepod Acartia tonsa. Mar. Biol. 2006, 148, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lambshead, P.J.D. Recent developments in marine benthic biodiversity research. Oceanis 1993, 19, 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  103. Gems, D. Longevity and ageing in parasitic and free-living nematodes. Biogerontology 2000, 1, 289–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A part of the GC chromatogram of FAME from TL of the abyssal sea star Eremicaster vicinus. Conditions: Supelcowax 10 column, 30 m, at 205 °C, detector FID. FAME of 21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), 22:5(n-5), 23:4(n-9), and 22:6(n-2) acids had ECL values of 22.09, 22.98, 23.53, 23.82, and 24.53, respectively. Uncommon and new acids are underlined.
Figure 1. A part of the GC chromatogram of FAME from TL of the abyssal sea star Eremicaster vicinus. Conditions: Supelcowax 10 column, 30 m, at 205 °C, detector FID. FAME of 21:4(n-7), 22:4(n-8), 22:5(n-5), 23:4(n-9), and 22:6(n-2) acids had ECL values of 22.09, 22.98, 23.53, 23.82, and 24.53, respectively. Uncommon and new acids are underlined.
Marinedrugs 20 00017 g001
Table 1. New and uncommon FA found in lipids of abyssal Foraminifera and Echinodermata. Data are presented as mol %; new acids are highlighted in bold. High concentrations are underlined.
Table 1. New and uncommon FA found in lipids of abyssal Foraminifera and Echinodermata. Data are presented as mol %; new acids are highlighted in bold. High concentrations are underlined.
FA%SpeciesPlace and DepthReferences
Foraminifera
21:4(n-7)2.4–4.8%Bathysiphon lanosum,
B. major
Rhabdammina abyssorum,
Rh. Parabyssorum
Kuril Basin, Sea of Okhotsk, 3307–3386 m[20]
22:4(n-8)1.2–2.0%
23:4(n-9)1.7–2.3%
∆4-i-16:10.6–1.1%
∆7-i-21:10.4%
∆7-ai-21:10.3–0.8%
∆4,11–18:20.3–0.9%
∆4,7–20:2
∆7,12–20:20.4–0.6%
∆4,7–21:20.6%
∆7,12–22:26.4–2.1%
20:3(n-5)1.2%Reophax nodulosusKuril Basin, Sea of Okhotsk, and the adjacent abyssal area of the Pacific Ocean, including the slope of the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench, 3500 m[21]
22:3(n-5)2.4%
22:5(n-5)18.3%
23:4(n-7)0.4%Pyrgo sp.
24:4(n-8)0.4%
24:5(n-9)1.7%
26:4(n-6)0.9%
26:5(n-3)0.9%
Echinodermata
22:6(n-2)1.6–0.33%sea urchin Eremicaster vicinus
sea star Kamptosoma abyssale
Kuril–Kamchatka Trench, 5200 and 6300 m[22]
22:5(n-5)2.8%sea star Eremicaster sp. [50]
24:6(n-3)20.5%ophiuran Ophiopenia vicina
26:7(n-3)14.5%ophiuran Amphiophiura ponderosa
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Svetashev, V.I. Investigation of Deep-Sea Ecosystems Using Marker Fatty Acids: Sources of Essential Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Abyssal Megafauna. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20010017

AMA Style

Svetashev VI. Investigation of Deep-Sea Ecosystems Using Marker Fatty Acids: Sources of Essential Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Abyssal Megafauna. Marine Drugs. 2022; 20(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20010017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Svetashev, Vasily I. 2022. "Investigation of Deep-Sea Ecosystems Using Marker Fatty Acids: Sources of Essential Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Abyssal Megafauna" Marine Drugs 20, no. 1: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20010017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop