Next Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue “Hot Topics and Innovations in Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery/Aesthetic Medicine”
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiology of Tennis-Related Injuries Among Competitive Youth Players in Tunisia: Frequency, Characteristics, and Management Patterns
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Apolipoprotein C-III Gene Polymorphisms (rs2854116 and rs2854117) with Susceptibility to Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in a Turkish Population

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34452 İstanbul, Turkey
2
Department of Family Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34452 İstanbul, Turkey
3
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34452 İstanbul, Turkey
4
Department of Medical Biology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34452 İstanbul, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1479; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081479
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 25 July 2025 / Accepted: 31 July 2025 / Published: 18 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatology)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is characterized by the accumulation of fat in the liver, progressing from simple steatosis to various complications, with increasing prevalence in the modern world. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between MASLD pathogenesis and the presence of apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) gene variants rs2854116 and rs2854117 by comparing allele and genotype frequencies between MASLD patients and healthy individuals, as well as analyzing their association with biochemical parameters in Turkish populations. Materials and Methods: The study included 202 MASLD patients and 100 healthy controls who presented to our outpatient clinic. MASLD presence was determined by ultrasonography (USG). The demographic, laboratory, and clinical data of the participants were recorded. ApoC-III gene variants rs2854116 and rs2854117 were genotyped using the Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method from genomic DNA samples obtained from blood. Results: The genotype and allele frequencies of ApoC-III gene variants rs2854116 and rs2854117 did not show significant differences between patient and healthy groups (p > 0.05). When biochemical parameters were evaluated, the LDH value of rs2854116 variant CT/CC genotype carriers was found to be significantly higher than TT genotype carriers (p = 0.016). Conclusions: We observed a high prevalence of MASLD in our Turkish cohort. However, the specific genetic variants we investigated were not associated with MASLD status. This suggests that these variants may not be significant contributing factors to MASLD in this population.

1. Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the current term for what was formerly called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). MASLD refers to a condition characterized by hepatic steatosis involving ≥5% of hepatocytes in the absence of a defined secondary cause of fat accumulation, such as medications or monogenic disorders [1].
The global prevalence of MASLD has been estimated at 30.2–32.4% [2,3]. The pathophysiological spectrum of MASLD progresses from non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), characterized by macro vesicular steatosis with minimal inflammation, to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), marked by inflammatory infiltrates and hepatocellular ballooning, and ultimately to cirrhosis, defined by fibrous septation and nodular regeneration. These stages represent a continuum of increasing hepatocellular injury and functional impairment, ultimately contributing to significant morbidity and mortality [4,5].
In a study conducted in Turkey, the prevalence of MASLD was found to be 48.3% [6]. MASLD is commonly associated with a range of comorbid conditions, most notably obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and heart failure [4,7]. Given these associations, identifying risk factors is important for stratifying patients and understanding the mechanisms of disease progression, which can inform clinical management.
Apolipoproteins are associated with lipoproteins, which play a crucial role in the transport of cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids, and fat-soluble vitamins between the intestine, liver, and peripheral tissues. Apo C-III is a low molecular weight apolipoprotein primarily produced by hepatic cells and, to a lesser extent, by enterocytes. Plasma levels of ApoC-III are elevated in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and are associated with insulin resistance [8,9]. This suggests that the increase in ApoC-III during the development of atherogenic dyslipidemia may exacerbate insulin resistance, thereby accelerating the development of type 2 DM and hepatic steatosis [10,11,12]. Recent studies on ApoC-III have highlighted that two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene encoding ApoC-III (rs2854116 and rs2854117) may be associated with hypertriglyceridemia [13,14,15,16,17]. These SNPs are in the promoter region of the gene. The variant alleles of rs2854116 (T-455C) and rs2854117 (C-482T) are linked to higher in vitro expression of ApoC-III compared to the wild-type alleles [18]. These ApoC-III variants have been shown to promote both fasting and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia by reducing triglyceride clearance. Specifically, the ApoC-III variants (rs2854116 and rs2854117) result in an approximately 30% increase in fasting plasma ApoC-III concentrations, a 60% increase in fasting plasma triglyceride concentrations, and nearly a twofold increase in postprandial plasma triglyceride and retinyl fatty acid ester concentrations following an oral fat tolerance test [8].
In our study, we aim to investigate the association of the ApoC-III gene variants rs2854116 and rs2854117 with the presence and pathogenesis of MASLD in the Turkish population. This will be accomplished by comparing the allele and genotype frequencies of these variants in individuals with MASLD to those of healthy controls. Additionally, we will analyze the biochemical parameters of the participants. This research will contribute to population-specific genetic data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Laboratory Findings

Volunteers over 18 years of age were included in our study, comprising patients diagnosed with MASLD through imaging methods and healthy controls without any known disease history, who presented as outpatients to the Internal Medicine Clinic of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Hospital between May–September 2023. Individuals over 75 years of age; under 18 years of age; those with active malignancy or history thereof; those with any organ-tissue transplant history; pregnant women; those consuming alcohol over 140 g weekly for women and 210 g for men; those with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60; pregnant women; those with CRP > 5 mg/L; those with primary liver diseases other than MASLD such as primary biliary cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, viral hepatitis, and Wilson’s disease; those with active infection; and those with missing information were excluded from the study. When volunteers were included in the study, their current liver steatosis status was re-evaluated using liver ultrasonography, and patients without current steatosis and controls with steatosis were excluded from the study. After exclusions, 202 confirmed MASLD patients and 100 healthy controls were included in the study.
This study protocol was approved by the Non-Scope Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine (Date: 14 April 2023) and was conducted in accordance with the standards specified in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent forms were obtained from all patients and healthy volunteers before starting the study.
Participants’ weekly alcohol consumption, smoking habits, hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM), DM type, DM complications, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia and its types, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cerebrovascular disease, family history of CVD, medication groups for DM and HT, and disease durations were questioned and recorded. Laboratory tests performed from blood samples given by participants after 12 h of fasting during their outpatient clinic control and recorded in the outpatient file were evaluated. Those with triglyceride (TG) levels ≥ 150 mg/dL were defined as having hypertriglyceridemia (hyper-TG). Those who met any of the definitions of hyper-TG, hypo-HDL, and hyper-LDL were combined under the definition of dyslipidemia. FIB-4 [19], NFS [20], homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [21], and De Ritis ratio (AST/ALT) [22] were calculated using laboratory values, clinical characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and demographic features of the patients.

2.2. Determination of Liver Steatosis Grade

After completing the anthropometric measurements of individuals, a high-resolution ultrasonography system B mode (GE Logiq E9, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and a convex probe with a frequency bandwidth of 1–6 MegaHertz were used to evaluate the presence of liver steatosis and determine the degree of steatosis if present. The grading of liver steatosis is generally obtained using certain USG features including liver brightness, contrast difference between liver and kidney, appearance of intrahepatic vessels on USG, and liver parenchyma and diaphragm. Steatosis grades were determined as grade 0 normal liver, grade 1 mild steatosis, grade 2 moderate steatosis, and grade 3 severe steatosis. The performance of USG in detecting mild steatosis (fat content > 5%) is low, with a sensitivity of 60.9–65% [23,24]. When compared with biopsy for the detection of moderate and severe liver steatosis (>20–30% fatty), sensitivity was found to be 84.8% and specificity 93.6% [25]. In our study, the definition of steatosis used when defining MASLD was based on steatosis detected in USG.

2.3. APOC-III Gene rs2854116 and rs2854117 Variant Analyses

From blood samples taken from the study groups in 2 tubes containing 3 cc of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), leukocyte isolation was performed first, then DNA isolation was carried out from the obtained leukocytes using a commercial kit (Elk Biotech Cat no: EP008) (ELK Biotecnology Co., Ltd., Denver, CO, USA). ApoC-III rs2854116 and rs2854117 variants were genotyped by the Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. FokI enzyme was used as the restriction endonuclease enzyme for the rs2854116 variant, and MspI enzyme was used for the rs2854117 variant (New England Biolabs, cat no: R0109S, R0106T, respectively) (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Restriction products were run on 3.5% agarose gel and genotyping was performed under UV light.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data obtained in the study was performed using the SPSS 28.0 program. Mean, standard deviation, median, lowest, highest, frequency, and ratio values were used in the descriptive statistics of the data. The distribution of variables was measured with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. The independent sample t-test was used in the analysis of quantitative independent data with normal distribution. The Mann–Whitney U test was used in the analysis of quantitative independent data with non-normal distribution. The chi-square test was used in the analysis of qualitative independent data, and Fischer’s exact test was used when chi-square test conditions were not met. Results were considered statistically significant if the p-value was ≤0.05.

3. Results

A total of 302 participants were included in the study, of whom 152 (50.3%) were male and 150 (49.7%) were female. Body Mass Index of participants (BMI)—Min–Max: 16.5–47.3; Median: 27.5; Mean ± Standard Deviation: 27.8 ± 5.0 (in Table 1). The demographic characteristics are displayed in Table 1 and the genetic and laboratory characteristics of all participants are presented in Table 2.
No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in the distribution of ApoC-III rs2854116/FokI and ApoC-III rs2854117/MspI genotypes between case and control groups. However, the case group had significantly higher (p < 0.05) FIB4 scores and MASLD fibrosis scores compared to the control group. Similarly, the risk stratification based on both scores showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) risk levels in the case group (Table 3).
When comparing patients with TT versus CT/CC genotypes of ApoC-III rs2854116/FokI, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in the presence of hepatic steatosis, liver cirrhosis, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes status, or diabetes complications (nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy). Cardiovascular disease rates were also similar between these genotype groups (Table 4).
Laboratory parameters including CRP, AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, fasting glucose, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, insulin, C-peptide, LDL, triglycerides, HDL, total cholesterol, and AST/ALT ratio showed no significant differences between the genotype groups. However, LDH levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the CT/CC group compared to the TT group. The CC genotype of ApoC-III rs2854117/MspI was significantly more common (p < 0.05) in the CT/CC group of ApoC-III rs2854116/FokI compared to the TT group. No significant differences were observed in FIB4 score, MASLD fibrosis score, or disease duration between these genotype groups.
Similarly, when comparing patients with CC versus CT/TT genotypes of ApoC-III rs2854117/MspI, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in the presence of hepatic steatosis, liver cirrhosis, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes status, complications, or cardiovascular disease (Table 5 and Table 6).
All laboratory parameters and fibrosis scores were comparable between the ApoC-III rs2854117/MspI genotype groups, with no significant differences in disease duration.

4. Discussion

The major findings of this study indicate that the ApoC-III gene polymorphisms rs2854116 and rs2854117 are not significantly associated with the presence or severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in our Turkish population. This contrasts with the expected metabolic alterations observed in MASLD patients, such as higher BMI, elevated liver enzymes (ALT, AST, GGT), increased triglyceride levels, and reduced HDL cholesterol, which were not linked to the ApoC-III genotypes in our cohort. Furthermore, neither polymorphism showed a significant correlation with steatosis grades observed on ultrasonography nor with non-invasive fibrosis scores, including FIB-4 and the MASLD fibrosis score.
MASLD has been associated with subclinical levels of systemic inflammation [26,27]. A meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with MASLD exhibit significantly elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), along with increases in other inflammatory markers, thereby supporting the presence of subclinical inflammation in this patient population [28]. In our study, the observed elevation in CRP levels among individuals with MASLD further reinforces the notion that subclinical inflammation is a characteristic feature accompanying the disease.
When comparing the patient and control groups, the median fasting glucose level was found to be 95.5 mg/dL in the patient group and 86 mg/dL in the control group. Similarly, the median HbA1c level was 5.75% in the patient group and 5.20% in the control group, with the differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). This disparity is likely attributable to the presence of individuals with comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose in the patient group, whereas the control group consisted of healthy adults. Furthermore, the higher levels of insulin and C-peptide observed in the patient group may be explained by the presence of hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes in this group, as well as a higher prevalence of obesity and central obesity, which are commonly associated with increased insulin resistance.
In the evaluation of laboratory lipid profile parameters, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and LDL levels were found to be significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Plasma lipid abnormalities are more frequently observed in individuals with MASLD, and triglycerides (TG) play a critical role in the pathogenesis of the disease [29]. The differences in total cholesterol, LDL, and TG levels observed in our study are consistent with the existing literature and may reflect the metabolic burden and increased risk of metabolic syndrome in patients with MASLD.
A statistically significant difference was observed between the patient and control groups in liver enzyme levels, including AST, ALT, ALP, and GGT. Additionally, the AST/ALT ratio was significantly lower in the patient group. The median HOMA-IR value was 3.60 in the patient group compared to 1.65 in the control group. Considering that a HOMA-IR value of 2 is widely accepted as the threshold for insulin resistance, these findings indicate a higher prevalence of insulin resistance among individuals with MASLD [30]. This aligns with existing literature, which underscores the close association between MASLD and insulin resistance [4].
Among the non-invasive tests (NITs) used for assessing liver fibrosis, FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) levels were found to be higher in the MASLD group. When the FIB-4 and NFS scores were stratified into fibrosis risk categories, the relatively low number of patients in the high-risk group suggests that the patient population in this study represents individuals with a lower fibrosis burden. This implies that our study predominantly reflects patients in the earlier stages of MASLD. The observed correlation with FIB-4 and NFS provides insight into the relationship between liver fibrosis and more advanced stages of MASLD, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
Polymorphisms in ApoC-III have shown inconsistent associations with MASLD across different populations in the literature. While meta-analyses suggest mixed results, some studies have reported that the rs2854116 polymorphism (T-455C) in the ApoC-III gene promoter may be associated with increased risk of MASLD, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance, particularly in Asian populations including South Asians, though the rs2854117 polymorphism (C-482T) shows less consistent associations. However, the clinical significance of these variants remains unclear due to conflicting findings across studies and populations [8,31].
Another study examining ApoC-III polymorphism in Asian countries, which included 1750 MASLD patients and 2181 healthy participants, reported a strong association between the rs2854116 variant and MASLD. However, in the subgroup analysis of MASLD cases by country, no relationship was detected in China [31]. In another study conducted in China with 390 MASLD patients and 409 healthy individuals, no significant difference was found between the MASLD population and controls in terms of genotype and allele frequencies of rs2854116 and rs2854117 (p > 0.05) [32]. In our study, the polymorphisms in ApoC-III (rs2854116 and rs2854117) examined in participants were not found to be significant between the patient group and the control group. This may be attributed to all participants being of Turkish ethnic origin.
Regarding the elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in rs2854116 CT/CC carriers in our study, LDH is a non-specific marker of tissue damage. While the precise pathophysiological relevance of this elevation in the context of MASLD for these specific genotypes requires further investigation, it may suggest increased cellular stress or damage that is not directly mediated by the ApoC-III variants’ primary role in lipid metabolism, or it could be a consequence of broader metabolic perturbations linked to these genotypes, even if not directly leading to MASLD susceptibility in our cohort.

Limitations

Our study’s reliance on ultrasonography for MASLD diagnosis is a limitation. While widely used as a first-line method due to its non-invasive nature, ultrasonography is relatively insensitive for detecting mild steatosis, and liver biopsy or MRI-PDFF are considered more accurate modalities. This could affect the precision of steatosis grading and potentially influence associations. Additionally, while we analyzed the main ApoC-III variants, we did not investigate other SNPs such as PNPLA3, TM6SF2, GCKR, MBOAT7, or HSD17B13, which are extensively recognized for their significant contributions to MASLD susceptibility and progression. This limits the comprehensive understanding of genetic contributions in our cohort. The single-center design and limited representation of patients with advanced fibrosis and compensated cirrhosis, along with the absence of a positive control group for comorbid conditions, also limit the generalizability of our findings. Future studies with larger, multi-ethnic cohorts, utilizing gold-standard diagnostic methods, and incorporating a broader panel of genetic markers are warranted to fully elucidate the complex genetic architecture of MASLD in the Turkish population and globally.

5. Conclusions

This study represents the first comprehensive investigation of ApoC-III gene polymorphisms in Turkish MASLD patients, contributing valuable population-specific genetic data to the international literature. Our analysis of rs2854116 (T-455C) and rs2854117 (C-482T) polymorphisms revealed no significant associations between these variants and MASLD susceptibility in our Turkish population, contrasting with positive associations reported in other ethnic populations. Understanding these genetic contributions is crucial for developing personalized diagnostic tools and management strategies for MASLD, emphasizing the need for comprehensive genetic studies in diverse populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K.; methodology, D.K., S.M., N.S., E.B., Y.O., T.T., S.P. and A.M.; validation, D.K.; formal analysis, D.K., S.M., N.S., E.B., Y.O., S.P. and A.M.; investigation, D.K., N.S., E.B., Y.O., T.T. and S.P.; resources, D.K.; data curation, D.K., N.S., E.B., Y.O., S.P. and A.M.; writing—original draft, D.K., S.M., N.S., E.B., Y.O., T.T. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, D.K., S.M., N.S., E.B., Y.O., T.T., S.P. and A.M.; visualization, D.K.; supervision, N.S., E.B., Y.O. and T.T.; project administration, D.K., N.S. and T.T.; funding acquisition, D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project number: TTU-2023-40066.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study protocol was approved by the Non-Scope Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine (Approval Code: No.8, Date: 14 April 2023) and was conducted in accordance with the standards specified in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent forms were obtained from all patients and healthy volunteers before starting the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Han, S.K.; Baik, S.K.; Kim, M.Y. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Definition and subtypes. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2023, 29, S5–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Riazi, K.; Azhari, H.; Charette, J.H.; Underwood, F.E.; King, J.A.; Afshar, E.E.; Swain, M.G.; Congly, S.E.; Kaplan, G.G.; Shaheen, A.A. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amini-Salehi, E.; Letafatkar, N.; Norouzi, N.; Joukar, F.; Habibi, A.; Javid, M.; Sattari, N.; Khorasani, M.; Farahmand, A.; Tavakoli, S.; et al. Global Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Updated Review Meta-Analysis comprising a Population of 78 million from 38 Countries. Arch. Med. Res. 2024, 55, 103043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rinella, M.E.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Siddiqui, M.S.; Abdelmalek, M.F.; Caldwell, S.; Barb, D.; Kleiner, D.E.; Loomba, R. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2023, 77, 1797–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Estes, C.; Razavi, H.; Loomba, R.; Younossi, Z.; Sanyal, A.J. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology 2018, 67, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Değertekin, B.; Tözün, N.; Demir, F.; Söylemez, G.; Parkan, Ş.; Gürtay, E.; Mutlu, D.; Toraman, M.; Seymenoğlu, T.H. The Changing Prevalence of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in Turkey in the Last Decade. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 32, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Duell, P.B.; Welty, F.K.; Miller, M.; Chait, A.; Hammond, G.; Ahmad, Z.; Cohen, D.E.; Horton, J.D.; Pressman, G.S.; Toth, P.P.; et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2022, 42, e168–e185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petersen, K.F.; Dufour, S.; Hariri, A.; Nelson-Williams, C.; Foo, J.N.; Zhang, X.M.; Dziura, J.; Lifton, R.P.; Shulman, G.I. Apolipoprotein C3 Gene Variants in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hiukka, A.; Fruchart-Najib, J.; Leinonen, E.; Hilden, H.; Fruchart, J.-C.; Taskinen, M.-R. Alterations of lipids and apolipoprotein CIII in very low density lipoprotein subspecies in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005, 48, 1207–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Aguilar-Recarte, D.; Palomer, X.; Vázquez-Carrera, M. Uncovering the role of apolipoprotein C-III in insulin resistance. Clin. Investig. Arter. 2021, 33, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koo, D.J.; Lee, W.Y. The crosstalk between insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: A culprit or a consequence? Cardiovasc. Prev. Pharmacother. 2022, 4, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nogueira, J.P.; Cusi, K. Role of Insulin Resistance in the Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in People with Type 2 Diabetes: From Bench to Patient Care. Diabetes Spectr. 2024, 37, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. van Dijk, K.W.; Rensen, P.C.; Voshol, P.J.; Havekes, L.M. The role and mode of action of apolipoproteins CIII and AV: Synergistic actors in triglyceride metabolism? Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2004, 15, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Olivieri, O.; Bassi, A.; Stranieri, C.; Trabetti, E.; Martinelli, N.; Pizzolo, F.; Girelli, D.; Friso, S.; Pignatti, P.F.; Corrocher, R. Apolipoprotein C-III, metabolic syndrome, and risk of coronary artery disease. J. Lipid Res. 2003, 44, 2374–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Olivieri, O.; Stranieri, C.; Bassi, A.; Zaia, B.; Girelli, D.; Pizzolo, F.; Trabetti, E.; Cheng, S.; Grow, M.A.; Pignatti, P.F.; et al. ApoC-III gene polymorphisms and risk of coronary artery disease. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 1450–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guettier, J.M.; Georgopoulos, A.; Tsai, M.Y.; Radha, V.; Shanthirani, S.; Deepa, R.; Gross, M.; Rao, G.; Mohan, V. Polymorphisms in the fatty acid-binding protein 2 and apolipoprotein C-III genes are associated with the metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia in a South Indian population. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 1705–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miller, M.; Rhyne, J.; Chen, H.; Beach, V.; Ericson, R.; Luthra, K.; Dwivedi, M.; Misra, A. APOC3 promoter polymorphisms C-482T and T-455C are associated with the metabolic syndrome. Arch. Med. Res. 2007, 38, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, W.W.; Dammerman, M.M.; Smith, J.D.; Metzger, S.; Breslow, J.L.; Leff, T. Common genetic variation in the promoter of the human apo CIII gene abolishes regulation by insulin and may contribute to hypertriglyceridemia. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 96, 2601–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sterling, R.K.; Lissen, E.; Clumeck, N.; Sola, R.; Correa, M.C.; Montaner, J.; Sulkowski, M.S.; Torriani, F.J.; Dieterich, D.T.; Thomas, D.L.; et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology 2006, 43, 1317–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Angulo, P.; Hui, J.M.; Marchesini, G.; Bugianesi, E.; George, J.; Farrell, G.C.; Enders, F.; Saksena, S.; Burt, A.D.; Bida, J.P.; et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: A noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007, 45, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matthews, D.R.; Hosker, J.P.; Rudenski, A.S.; Naylor, B.A.; Treacher, D.F.; Turner, R.C. Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985, 28, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. De Ritis, F.; Coltorti, M.; Giusti, G. An enzymic test for the diagnosis of viral hepatitis; the transaminase serum activities. Clin. Chim. Acta 1957, 2, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dasarathy, S.; Dasarathy, J.; Khiyami, A.; Joseph, R.; Lopez, R.; McCullough, A.J. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: A prospective study. J. Hepatol. 2009, 51, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. van Werven, J.R.; Marsman, H.A.; Nederveen, A.J.; Smits, N.J.; ten Kate, F.J.; van Gulik, T.M.; Stoker, J. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: Comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2010, 256, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hernaez, R.; Lazo, M.; Bonekamp, S.; Kamel, I.; Brancati, F.L.; Guallar, E.; Clark, J.M. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis. Hepatology 2011, 54, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fu Df Chen, B. The relationship between the systemic immune inflammation index and the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in American adolescents. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024, 24, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fricker, Z.P.; Pedley, A.; Massaro, J.M.; Vasan, R.S.; Hoffmann, U.; Benjamin, E.J.; Long, M.T. Liver Fat Is Associated With Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Analysis of Data From the Framingham Heart Study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 1157–1164.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duan, Y.; Pan, X.; Luo, J.; Xiao, X.; Li, J.; Bestman, P.L.; Luo, M. Association of Inflammatory Cytokines With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 880298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Patel, S.; Siddiqui, M.B.; Roman, J.H.; Zhang, E.; Lee, E.; Shen, S.; Faridnia, M.; Mintini, R.J.; Boyett, S.; Idowu, M.O.; et al. Association Between Lipoprotein Particles and Atherosclerotic Events in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 19, 2202–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Isokuortti, E.; Zhou, Y.; Peltonen, M.; Bugianesi, E.; Clement, K.; Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Lacorte, J.M.; Gastaldelli, A.; Schuppan, D.; Schattenberg, J.M.; et al. Use of HOMA-IR to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A population-based and inter-laboratory study. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 1873–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wang, J.; Ye, C.; Fei, S. Association between APOC3 polymorphisms and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease risk: A meta-analysis. Afr. Health Sci. 2020, 20, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Niu, T.H.; Jiang, M.; Xin, Y.N.; Jiang, X.J.; Lin, Z.H.; Xuan, S.Y. Lack of association between apolipoprotein C3 gene polymorphisms and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Chinese Han population. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 3655–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Demographic characteristics.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics.
Participants CharacteristicsMin–MaxMedianMean ± SDn (%)
Age19.0–71.044.043.8 ± 15.0
Basal Metabolic Age17.0–79.047.046.3 ± 14.5
Gender
 Female 150 (49.7%)
 Male 152 (50.3%)
Height (m)1.46–1.941.691.70 ± 0.10
Weight (kg)46.0–130.081.080.4 ± 15.9
Body Mass Index(BMI) (kg/m2)16.5–47.327.527.8 ± 5.0
 Underweight 5 (1.7%)
 Normal 86 (28.5%)
 Overweight 121 (40.1%)
 Obese 90 (29.8%)
Body Density0.96–1.071.021.02 ± 0.02
Fat Percentage %10.0–56.029.030.1 ± 8.6
Water Percentage %1.0–69.051.050.7 ± 7.8
Waist Circumference (cm)59.0–136.098.099.5 ± 13.6
Neck Circumference (cm)24.0–98.036.036.2 ± 6.1
Waist/Height Ratio0.36–0.800.550.56 ± 0.08
Leg Circumference (cm)28.0–70.048.047.5 ± 6.8
Arm Circumference (cm)17.0–91.028.028.3 ± 5.0
Active Smoking
 No 210 (69.5%)
 Yes 92 (30.5%)
Cigarette Consumption (Pack/Year)1.0–90.015.019.7 ± 19.2
Ex-Smoker
 No 281 (93.0%)
 Yes 21 (7.0%)
Ex-Smoker Duration (Months)1.0–360.0120.0136.8 ± 112.9
Alcohol Use
 No 245 (81.1%)
 Yes 57 (18.9%)
Alcohol Consumption (Day/Week)0.0–175.025.053.8 ± 51.6
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)94.0–158.0126.0125.7 ± 11.6
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)39.0–101.079.079.2 ± 9.4
Table 2. Demographic characteristics and ApoC-III alleles of all participants.
Table 2. Demographic characteristics and ApoC-III alleles of all participants.
VariableCategoryn%
USG Steatosis(−)10233.8%
Grade I9130.1%
Grade II9330.8%
Grade III165.3%
Liver Cirrhosis(−)30199.7%
(+)10.3%
Dyslipidemia(−)16655.0%
(+)13645.0%
Hypertriglyceridemia(−)23076.2%
(+)7223.8%
Hypercholesterolemia(−)20266.9%
(+)10033.1%
Diabetes Status(−)20969.2%
Diabetes6220.5%
Impaired Fasting Glucose268.6%
Impaired Glucose Tolerance51.7%
Nephropathy(−)29597.7%
(+)72.3%
Retinopathy(−)29798.3%
(+)51.7%
Neuropathy(−)29497.4%
(+)82.6%
Cardiovascular Disease(−)29397.0%
(+)93.0%
ApoC-III rs2854116/FoklCC9431.1%
TC14347.4%
TT6521.5%
ApoC-III rs2854117 MsplCC13544.7%
TC10835.8%
TT5919.5%
FIB4 Score0.21–42.160.701.00 ± 0.70
FIB4 Risk Categories
Low Risk 269 (89.1%)
Intermediate Risk 29 (9.6%)
High Risk 4 (1.3%)
MASLD Fibrosis Score−6.07–1.45−2.61−2.58 ± 1.42
MASLD Risk Categories
Low Risk 241 (79.8%)
Intermediate Risk 57 (18.9%)
High Risk 4 (1.3%)
Note: Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus include a Hemoglobin A1C of 6.5% or higher, a fasting glucose at or above 126 mg/dL, or a random glucose of 200 mg/dL or greater with symptoms. Dyslipidemia is defined by blood lipid levels such as an LDL cholesterol of 160 mg/dL or higher, an HDL cholesterol below 40 mg/dL, or triglycerides at or above 200 mg/dL. Nephropathy, or chronic kidney disease, is established when a patient’s GFR is below 60 or albuminuria (ACR ≥ 30 mg/g) persists for more than three months. Diabetic retinopathy is staged based on fundoscopic findings, progressing from non-proliferative disease with microaneurysms to proliferative disease marked by neovascularization. The criteria for liver cirrhosis involve a combination of clinical signs, specific laboratory abnormalities, and imaging findings, with a biopsy providing definitive confirmation. For cardiovascular disease, Stage 2 hypertension is a key criterion, defined by a blood pressure reading of 140/90 mm Hg or higher. −: ABSENT, +: EXIST.
Table 3. Comparison of genetic profiles and scores between control and case groups.
Table 3. Comparison of genetic profiles and scores between control and case groups.
VariableCategoryControl Group (n = 100)Case Group (n = 202)p-ValueTest
n%Mean ± SDMediann%Mean ± SDMedian
ApoC-III rs2854116/FokICC3131.0%--6331.2%--0.990X2
TC4747.0%--9647.5%--
TT2222.0%--4321.3%--
ApoC-III rs2854117 MspICC4646.0%--8944.1%--0.543X2
TC3838.0%--7034.7%--
TT1616.0%--4321.3%--
FIB4 Score---0.84 ± 2.180.57--1.09 ± 2.940.800.000m
FIB4 Score CategoriesLow Risk9797.0%--17285.1%--0.002X2
Moderate Risk22.0%--2713.4%--
High Risk11.0%--31.5%--
MASLD Fibrosis Score---−3.47 ± 1.02−3.67--−2.14 ± 1.39−2.160.000m
MASLD Fibrosis Score CategoriesLow Risk9797.0%--14471.3%--0.000X2
Moderate Risk33.0%--5426.7%--
High Risk00.0%--42.0%--
Abbreviations: mean, average; SD—standard deviation; t—independent sample t-test; m—Mann–Whitney U test; X2—chi-square test (Fisher’s test).
Table 4. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics between patients with TT and CT/CC genotypes of the ApoC-IIIrs2854116/FokI variant.
Table 4. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics between patients with TT and CT/CC genotypes of the ApoC-IIIrs2854116/FokI variant.
ParameterCategoryTT (n = 43)CT/CC (n = 159)p-Value/Test
n%n%
USG Steatosis(−)00.0%31.9%1.000/X2
Grade I1841.9%7245.3%
Grade II2148.8%7245.3%
Grade III49.3%127.5%
Liver Cirrhosis(−)43100.0%15899.4%1.000/X2
(+)00.0%10.6%
Dyslipidemia(−)1637.2%7849.1%0.167/X2
(+)2762.8%8150.9%
Hypertriglyceridemia(−)2660.5%11270.4%0.212/X2
(+)1739.5%4729.6%
Hypercholesterolemia(−)2353.5%9761.0%0.373/X2
(+)2046.5%6239.0%
Diabetes Status(−)2455.8%8654.1%0.840/X2
−: ABSENT, +: EXIST.
Table 5. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics between patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes of ApoC-IIIrs2854117/MspI variant.
Table 5. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics between patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes of ApoC-IIIrs2854117/MspI variant.
CategoryGroupCC (n = 89) CT/TT (n = 113) p-Value/Test
n%n%
Ultrasound SteatosisNo Steatosis22.2%10.9%0.584 X2
Grade I4146.1%4943.4%
Grade II3741.6%5649.6%
Grade III910.1%76.2%
Liver CirrhosisNo89100.0%11299.1%1.000 X2
Yes00.0%10.9%
DyslipidemiaNo4348.3%5145.1%0.653 X2
Yes4651.7%6254.9%
HypertriglyceridemiaNo5966.3%7969.9%0.583 X2
Yes3033.7%3430.1%
HypercholesterolemiaNo5157.3%6961.1%0.589 X2
Yes3842.7%4438.9%
Diabetes StatusNo4550.6%6557.5%0.436 X2
Diabetes3033.7%3228.3%
Impaired Fasting1314.6%1210.6%
Impaired Glucos11.1%43.5%
NephropathyNo8696.6%10996.5%0.948 X2
Yes33.4%43.5%
RetinopathyNo8595.5%11299.1%0.101 X2
Yes44.5%10.9%
NeuropathyNo8595.5%10996.5%0.730 X2
Yes44.5%43.5%
Cardiovascular DiseaseNo8494.4%10996.5%0.477 X2
Yes55.6%43.5%
Table 6. Comparison of laboratory characteristics between patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes of ApoC-IIIrs2854117/MspI variant.
Table 6. Comparison of laboratory characteristics between patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes of ApoC-IIIrs2854117/MspI variant.
ParameterCC (Mean ± SD)CC (Median)CT/TT (Mean ± SD)CT/TT (Median)p-Value
CRP3.15 ± 3.262.103.39 ± 4.262.40694
AST23.0 ± 8.821.526.1 ± 19.322.0665
ALT32.2 ± 22.525.934.1 ± 29.526.9842
ALP77.1 ± 25.075.076.9 ± 21.876.0688
GGT30.1 ± 22.023.032.7 ± 29.126.0558
LDH191.8 ± 41.4183.0190.9 ± 47.6180.0665
Fasting Glucose107.4 ± 33.895.0106.9 ± 40.496.0575
HbA1c6.14 ± 1.395.806.08 ± 1.385.70623
Homa-IR5.33 ± 8.123.464.71 ± 5.113.67561
Insulin18.4 ± 17.314.516.9 ± 13.815.0881
C-Peptide3.77 ± 2.303.433.55 ± 1.683.40722
LDL123.4 ± 33.1122.0127.6 ± 40.4126.0557
Triglyceride177.9 ± 119.8138.2168.2 ± 113.5142.0421
HDL47.8 ± 16.444.445.1 ± 11.844.0393
Total Cholesterol195.3 ± 36.7190.0198.7 ± 49.2192.0686
AST/ALT Ratio0.86 ± 0.310.850.91 ± 0.370.85553
Disease Duration (Month)33.1 ± 68.60.023.5 ± 50.90.0564
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karaagac, D.; Morkuzu, S.; Senkal, N.; Bilgin, E.; Oyacı, Y.; Tükek, T.; Pehlivan, S.; Medetalibeyoglu, A. Association of Apolipoprotein C-III Gene Polymorphisms (rs2854116 and rs2854117) with Susceptibility to Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in a Turkish Population. Medicina 2025, 61, 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081479

AMA Style

Karaagac D, Morkuzu S, Senkal N, Bilgin E, Oyacı Y, Tükek T, Pehlivan S, Medetalibeyoglu A. Association of Apolipoprotein C-III Gene Polymorphisms (rs2854116 and rs2854117) with Susceptibility to Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in a Turkish Population. Medicina. 2025; 61(8):1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karaagac, Damla, Suat Morkuzu, Naci Senkal, Ersel Bilgin, Yasemin Oyacı, Tufan Tükek, Sacide Pehlivan, and Alpay Medetalibeyoglu. 2025. "Association of Apolipoprotein C-III Gene Polymorphisms (rs2854116 and rs2854117) with Susceptibility to Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in a Turkish Population" Medicina 61, no. 8: 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081479

APA Style

Karaagac, D., Morkuzu, S., Senkal, N., Bilgin, E., Oyacı, Y., Tükek, T., Pehlivan, S., & Medetalibeyoglu, A. (2025). Association of Apolipoprotein C-III Gene Polymorphisms (rs2854116 and rs2854117) with Susceptibility to Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in a Turkish Population. Medicina, 61(8), 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081479

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop