Next Article in Journal
Breast Cancer Screening and Prophylactic Mastectomy for High-Risk Women in Romania
Next Article in Special Issue
Cutaneous Calcified Mass of Foot in Pseudohypoparathyoidism: Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
The Initial Experience of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in Latvia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anatomic versus Low Tibial Tunnel in Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Osteoarthritis Development Following Meniscectomy vs. Meniscal Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Injuries: A Systematic Review

1
Doctoral School, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
2
Department XV, Discipline of Orthopedics, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
3
Orthopedics Unit, “Victor Popescu” Emergency Military Hospital, Gheorghe Lazar Street 2, 300080 Timisoara, Romania
4
Department X, Discipline of Vascular Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
5
Profesor Universitar Doctor Teodor Șora Research Centre, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040569
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 28 March 2024 / Accepted: 29 March 2024 / Published: 30 March 2024

Abstract

This systematic review aims to evaluate critically and synthesize the existing literature on the outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair for posterior medial meniscus injuries, with a focus on osteoarthritis (OA) development. We sought to assess the incidence of OA following both treatment modalities, compare functional outcomes post-treatment, and identify factors influencing treatment choice, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical decision-making. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up until December 2023, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes included OA development, functional knee outcomes, and quality of life measures. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 298 patients. The systematic review revealed a significant association between meniscal repair and decreased progression of OA compared to meniscectomy. Meniscectomy patients demonstrated a 51.42% progression rate towards OA, significantly higher than the 21.28% observed in meniscal repair patients. Functional outcomes, as measured by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, were notably better in the repair group, with average scores of 74.68 (IKDC) and 83.78 (Lysholm) compared to 67.55 (IKDC) and 74.56 (Lysholm) in the meniscectomy group. Furthermore, the rate of complete healing in the repair group was reported at 71.4%, as one study reported, indicating a favorable prognosis for meniscal preservation. However, these pooled data should be interpreted with consideration to the heterogeneity of the analyzed studies. Meniscal repair for posterior medial meniscus injuries is superior to meniscectomy in preventing OA development and achieving better functional outcomes and quality of life post-treatment. These findings strongly suggest the adoption of meniscal repair as the preferred treatment modality for such injuries, emphasizing the need for a paradigm shift in clinical practice towards preserving meniscal integrity to optimize patient outcomes.
Keywords: meniscal injuries; meniscectomy; meniscal repair; osteoarthritis; knee; posterior horn meniscus meniscal injuries; meniscectomy; meniscal repair; osteoarthritis; knee; posterior horn meniscus

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hurmuz, M.; Ionac, M.; Hogea, B.; Miu, C.A.; Tatu, F. Osteoarthritis Development Following Meniscectomy vs. Meniscal Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Injuries: A Systematic Review. Medicina 2024, 60, 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040569

AMA Style

Hurmuz M, Ionac M, Hogea B, Miu CA, Tatu F. Osteoarthritis Development Following Meniscectomy vs. Meniscal Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Injuries: A Systematic Review. Medicina. 2024; 60(4):569. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hurmuz, Mihai, Mihai Ionac, Bogdan Hogea, Catalin Adrian Miu, and Fabian Tatu. 2024. "Osteoarthritis Development Following Meniscectomy vs. Meniscal Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Injuries: A Systematic Review" Medicina 60, no. 4: 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040569

APA Style

Hurmuz, M., Ionac, M., Hogea, B., Miu, C. A., & Tatu, F. (2024). Osteoarthritis Development Following Meniscectomy vs. Meniscal Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Injuries: A Systematic Review. Medicina, 60(4), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040569

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop