Next Article in Journal
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma—Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going to?
Next Article in Special Issue
Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals PPRC1 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker in Ovarian Cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
The Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Clinical Prediction Model of Overall Survival for Patients with Cervical Cancer Aged 25–69 Years
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 4
10.3390/medicina59040728
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Infiltration by Intratumor and Stromal CD8 and CD68 in Cervical Cancer

by
Polina Dimitrova
1,
Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva
2,3,
Velizar Shivarov
3,
Ihsan Hasan
4 and
Angel Yordanov
5,*
1
Department of Pathology, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
2
Department of Breast Surgery, Shterev Hospital, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Research Institute, Medica University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital “Sofiamed”, 1750 Sofia, Bulgaria
5
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University-Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(4), 728; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040728
Submission received: 20 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 7 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Identification of Immunotherapy-Related Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a major role in neoplastic development. Various types of cells can be found in the TME. These cells can be classified into two groups, immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory types, depending on the function they perform in the antitumor immune response (IR). By interacting both with each other and with tumor cells, different immune mechanisms are activated or inhibited, which can suppress or promote the development and progression of cervical cancer (CC). Our aim was to investigate some of the main components of the cellular immune response in TME—tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells (Tc, CD8+) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs, CD68+)—in patients with CC. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 72 paraffin-embedded tumor tissues of patients diagnosed and treated at Medical University Pleven, Bulgaria. Patients were classified according to the 2018 FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) classification. From each patient, we selected one histological slide with hematoxylin eosin staining. In a microscopic evaluation, CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD68+-positive macrophages were counted in the tumor and stroma of five randomly selected fields at ×40 magnification (HPF). We analyzed the relationship between intratumoral and stromal CD8 and CD68 expression and FIGO stage and N status. Results: There was no significant association between the expression levels of intratumoral and stromal CD68+ cells in the different FIGO stages and according to the lymph nodes’ involvement. For CD8+ cells, the association of stromal infiltration was also not found, but T intratumor infiltration was associated with a higher FIGO stage, despite the fact that the results did not reach significance (p = 0.063, Fisher test). Intratumoral CD8+ cells were significantly associated with positive N status, (p = 0.035). Discussion: The separation of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells and tumor-associated macrophages into intratumoral and stromal is inconsequential. In our study, the level of infiltration of CD68+ cells in tumors and stromata was not significantly associated with tumor progression or lymph node involvement. The results were different for CD8+ cells, in which levels of infiltration were associated with lymph nodes’ statuses. Conclusions: The separate evaluation of CD68+ immune cells in the TME as intratumoral and stromal is not beneficial for defining prognoses, since the presence of these cells is not associated with the patient’s stage. In our study, the presence of CD8+ cells was significantly associated with lymph node metastases. The prognostic value of the obtained results can be enriched with an additional study of the lymphocyte phenotype, including B and other subtypes of T lymphocytes, NK cells, as well as molecules involved in the immune response, such as HLA subtypes.

1. Introduction

Despite the available options for the prevention and treatment of patients with cervical cancer (CC), including screening for human papilloma virus (HPV), prophylactic HPV vaccines, the surgical resection of already existing tumors, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the incidence of the disease remains high worldwide [1]. The conventional methods used for its treatment lead to a wide range of side effects, relapses and short disease-free survival [2,3].
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a major role in neoplastic development. Various types of cells are found in it, including tumor-associated fibroblasts, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and T and B lymphocytes. These cells can be classified into two groups, immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory types, depending on the function they perform in the antitumor immune response (IR) [4]. By interacting both with each other and with tumor cells, different immune mechanisms are activated or inhibited, which can suppress or promote the development and progression of CC.
Immunotherapy has led to a revolution in the treatment of various malignant diseases. The final goal of its application is to direct the body’s immune system against tumor cells. In October 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy or bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for CC [5]. Investigating the amount and spatial localization of key immune cell participants such as CD8+ and CD68+ cells will contribute to a better understanding of antitumor IR and its prognostic value in this type of cancer. The obtained results could enrich the information needed to improve the effect of the approved treatment or to develop another specific immunotherapy [2].
The natural immune response relies on the interaction of adaptive and innate immunity systems and the synergy between them. Among the tumor immune cell infiltrates, cytotoxic T cells (Tc, CD8+) in the adaptive immune system have been found to act specifically on cancer cells and are the most powerful effectors in the anticancer immune response. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs, CD68+) are elevated in many cancers. They are able to influence the activity of other immune cells, creating a pro or antitumor microenvironment. In studies with carcinomas of different localizations, CD8 and CD68 levels have been found to have conflicting prognostic value [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Since the data on this topic are few in patients with CC, we set out to study the role of some of the main components of the cellular immune response in TME—Tc, CD8+ and TAMs and CD68+ in this neoplasm—using an immunohistochemical method.
The aim of this research was to study some of the main components of the cellular immune response in TME—Tc and TAMs—in patients with CC in different stages and to analyze the relationship between intratumoral and stromal CD8 and CD68 expression and FIGO stage and N status.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

This is a retrospective study which included patients diagnosed with CC in the university hospitals of Medical University Pleven, Bulgaria for a 6-year period of time between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. The cases studied were randomly selected (until the predetermined number was dialed—72) from archival lists of the Department of Pathology of these hospitals. We used materials available in the hospital pathology archive that contained a sufficient amount of tumor tissue and in which the study would not threaten their depletion or impairment.
The 2018 FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) classification was used [12] (Table 1). There were only patients with lymph node involvement in FIGO stage III, because patients with FIGO stage IIIA and FIGO stage IIIB are not candidates for primary surgery. In all patients, radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection was performed without previous treatment.
The patients’ characteristics were obtained from the medical records and are given in Table 1.

2.2. Immunohistochemical Examination

For each patient participating in the study, one histological slide with hematoxylin eosin staining was selected. Slides for the immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of the subtypes of immune cells—Tc and macrophages—were prepared from its corresponding formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimen.
The EnVision™ FLEX, High pH, (Link), DAKO visualization system was used for antibody detection. From FFPE tissue samples, tissue sections with a thickness of 2–4 µm were prepared and placed on adhesive slides. Each of the 72 studied patients was tested with each of the two primary antibodies (pre-diluted, ready to use) and a visualization system using an AutostainerLink 48 automated system, DAKO (Table 2). All work procedures (including the deparaffinization and rehydration of tissue sections; heat-induced antigen retrieval; incubation with primary antibody and with the detection system; the visualization of the complex, etc.) when conducting the IHC analysis were performed according to the protocols for the respective antibodies of the manufacturing company. In each staining run, external control tissues were used to establish the functionality of the staining reagents, to assess the quality of the staining reaction, to determine the expression pattern of the antibodies used and to optimize the IHC work procedures before applying them to the studied cases (Table 3, Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The scoring of positive IHC-stained cells (colored brownish—with membrane and/or cytoplasmic expression for Tc; cytoplasmic for TAM), was performed independently by two pathologists who were not aware of the clinicopathological data of the studied cases. Similar to another study of ours [13], immunophenotyped lymphocytes (separately intratumoral and stromal) were counted (computer-assisted) and semiquantitatively graded. The average value of the results of the investigated cases with CC was taken as the cut-off.
In microscopic evaluation, CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD68+-positive macrophages were counted in the tumors and stromata of five randomly selected fields at ×40 magnification (HPF). Results with a mean number of up to 25 IHC-positive cells in stromal localization and up to 12 or 13 in intratumoral localization (for CD8 and CD68 subtypes, respectively) were considered as a low value of the respective cell subtype. With the corresponding higher number of positive cells, their high intratumoral or stromal concentration was reported (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Because of the small sample size, distributions of cases within each subgroup were analyzed using two-sided Fisher’s exact test. Uncorrected p-values below 0.05 were considered significant. Analyses were performed using base statistical functions from R v. 4.2.2 for Windows. Plots were generated using ggpubr v. 0.6.0 package for R.

3. Results

The expression levels of intratumoral and stromal CD8 and CD68 in patients with different stages of CC are shown on Table 4. There were very few or no samples in some of the groups, especially in the group with missing CD8+ and CD68 cells. Generally, the low concentration of the infiltration immune cells was most frequently observed in the advanced FIGO stage (FIGO III).
We analyzed the relationship between the levels of intratumoral and stromal CD8+ and CD68+ cells, FIGO stage and N status.
We compared the expression and the levels of intratumoral and stromal CD8+ cells in the different FIGO stages. Despite the fact that the results did not reach significance, there was a trend for a positive association between the CD8+ cells in the tumors and FIGO stage (p = 0.063, p = 1). When comparing the levels according to the different N status, we found a statistically significant difference in the infiltration of the tumors with CD8+ cells (p = 0.035). The infiltrations with CD8+ cells in the stroma were neither associated with FIGO stage nor with the N status (p = 0.870) (Figure 5).
The infiltrations of tumor and stroma with CD68+ cells were not associated with FIGO stage (p = 0.245, p = 0.162) and with N status (p = 0.185, p = 0.319) (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Neoplasms are complex structures in which tumor cells interact with their surroundings during their progression (invasive growth and metastatic spread). The antitumor cytotoxic cellular response is performed with the main participation of antigen-presenting cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes [2].
Macrophages are part of innate immunity, and through their ability to process and present antigens to produce cytokines necessary for T-lymphocyte activation, they are critical for initiating and mediating specific IR as well [14]. They play an important role in the fight against infections and neoplasms, but also in the regulation of the metabolic response to tissue stress [15]. There is a growing body of research investigating the role of macrophages in carcinogenesis, the prognostic and predictive role of their presence in the inflammatory infiltrate of TME and the possibility of macrophage-targeted immunotherapy [16,17].
The most common risk factor associated with the occurrence of CC is human papillomavirus (HPV) infection [2]. One of the hallmarks of oncogenic-virus-associated inflammation has been found to be the attraction and activation of a monocyte-macrophage cell population to the TME [17]. There are few reports on the role of CD68+ macrophages in CC, and the data on their prognostic significance for prognosis and survival are controversial [17,18,19].
According to some studies, the number of macrophages increases with the progression of cervical neoplastic lesions [16,18,20,21,22,23,24]. Tumor cells have been suggested to secrete various types of cytokines into the TME to promote monocyte migration to the neoplastic tissue. Moreover, a high concentration of these cells correlates with unfavorable clinical findings, such as metastatic lymph nodes and a more advanced stage according to FIGO. A possible explanation is that under the influence of tumor cells, macrophages probably contribute to carcinoma progression by changing their phenotype to one with reduced antigen-presenting function and the suppression of T-cell proliferation [16,17,25]. Other studies have found that high numbers of TAMs show a significant negative correlation with tumor stage and are not a prognostic marker in CC [1,17,26]. Immune cell quantification alone does not reflect the dynamics and functionality of the TME. In viable tissues, they are not fixed and can move spatially.
Similar to studies in other neoplasms, immune cells can be divided into intratumoral (intraepithelial) and stromal. Cells in the tumor nest or in direct contact with neoplastically altered cells are defined as intratumoral. Stromal immune cells in the connective tissue component pass between the tumor (parenchymal) zone without having direct contact with the tumor cells. Both types are true tumor-infiltrating immune cells—i.e., they are located in the tumor area. Their distinction is conditional, because it reflects their static localization in the studied histological section [27]. According to some results, the stromal component demonstrates a higher number of macrophages than the intraepithelial one. However, increased numbers of macrophages in the epithelial zone have also been found to be associated with malignant transformation in cervical cancer [17].
However, macrophages represent a phenotypically heterogeneous group of cells, and their physiology can be significantly modified in response to various biochemical factors in the TME [16]. Macrophages can be divided into two main categories—M1 and M2. M1 or classical macrophages are responsible for distinguishing and destroying various pathogens and cancer cells. They apply two mechanisms for effective outcomes: (i) directly mediating cytotoxicity to kill cancer cells, e.g., by using tumor-killing reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (ROS and NO) molecules [28]; (ii) antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) [2,29]. Intraepithelial infiltration with high numbers of M1 macrophages is an independent prognostic factor for a favorable prognosis [17].
M2 macrophages have a weakened capacity for antigen presentation and therefore have low antitumor activity. They have an increased capacity for tissue remodeling. They are associated with the progression and regulation of angiogenesis in CC [30]. M2 macrophages promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is a hallmark of invasion and metastasis, thereby promoting CC progression. Macrophage polarization to the M2 phenotype correlates with a reduced response to chemo- and radiotherapy and short survival in patients with regionally advanced cervical carcinoma. It has been found that after contact with tumor cells, M1 macrophages can undergo transformation from an M1 to an M2 phenotype [2,31], which is mainly associated with progressive tumors [16,25,26].
One of the shortcomings of our study is the use of a common CD68 macrophage marker, which cannot distinguish M1 or M2 subtypes of infiltrating macrophages. This does not allow us to give more definite and specific results about the prognostic value of this type of immune cells [17].
For a better understanding of the antitumor IR in CC, it is necessary to study its other main participants—tumor-infiltrating immune lymphocytes (TILs) [2]. Their presence in tumors is a reflection of the dynamic interaction of the host’s immune system with tumor antigens and the tumor microenvironment (TME). TILs represent a heterogeneous population of immune cells in tumor tissues. Functionally different B lymphocytes, NK and T cell subtypes may be present.
A growing number of studies have shown that the degree and composition of the tumor IR are prognostic for many solid malignant neoplasms. TILs’ assessment is recommended as a biomarker for routine histopathology reports in some cancers, but not yet in CC [1]. The analysis of the type, location, number and ratio of TILs (indicating phenotypic changes) may also provide useful information on the progression of CC and prognosis related to response to treatment.
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are major contributors to the destruction of cancer cells [2]. CD8+ TILs can kill tumor cells directly and indirectly. In the direct mechanism, they recognize specific tumor antigens and secrete factors such as perforin and granzyme, causing tumor cell death. In the indirect mechanism, they induce the apoptosis of the neoplastic cell population [1,32,33]. CD4+ T cells are the ones that provide help to CD8+ cells. The two cell types suggest primary immunity to tumor cells and are considered together in most studies of TILs in CC.
The established results show that the concentration of different types of immune cells could be used to predict the treatment outcome in patients with CC [3]. Conflicting data are available regarding the prognostic value of immune cells in different tumor regions [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
A trend toward increased TILs levels with the increasing grade of neoplastic epithelial changes has been established [1,34,35]. A detailed analysis of the literature on T-lymphocyte subpopulation studies found that in the epithelial layer of an HPV+ normal cervix, in severe dysplasia and in cancer progression, the concentrations of CD8+ TILs were significantly higher than CD4+. In the stroma, CD4+ TILs predominated in all groups of progression of epithelial changes, but no statistical difference was found between them. Because HPV mainly infects epithelial cells, these data suggest that CD8+ TILs are on the front line fighting virus-infected and neoplastically altered cells [1,3]. In early-stage cancer, CD8+ cells and the CD8+/CD4+ ratio were also found to be significantly elevated in patients without lymph node metastases. When the CD8+/CD4+ ratio decreases, both overall and disease-free survival rates decrease [44,45,46,47]. Some authors found an increase in the number of both types of T cells—CD8 and CD4—with the progression of the degree of the lesion [34]. According to data from other studies, there is a directly proportional correlation between a high number of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes [36,37] and its regression [5,38]. The largest number of studies have shown decreased expression levels of both T-lymphocyte subpopulations in precancerous lesions and CC, emphasizing the importance of local immunosuppression on the evolution of HPV-induced changes [16].
The evaluation of TILs in tumors is also becoming increasingly important in the search for the ideal biomarker to select patients with the highest probability of response to applied therapy, including immunotherapy. Some studies have evaluated the relationship of TILs with the results of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients with CC. According to them, an abundance of CD8+ TILs was associated with a better response to treatment. The presence of CD8+ TILs has been suggested to be a potential independent favorable prognostic factor for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma after radiotherapy. Patients with CD8+ TIL in tumor foci had a significantly better OS compared with patients without CD8+ TIL infiltration [1,3].
In our study, we compared the expression of stromal and intratumoral CD8+ and CD68+ cells, and we analyzed their role in tumor progression. We only found a significant association of the infiltration of CD8+ cell in tumors with the presence of metastatic lymph nodes.
Based on this, we cannot prove the role of intratumoral or stromal CD8 and CD68 expression in the progression of CC.
Unfortunately, the sample size of our study was relatively small, which probably influenced the small number of significant dependencies found. In addition, the carcinomas included in the study were not divided into groups depending on their histological type.

5. Conclusions

The separate evaluation of CD68+ immune cells in the TME as intratumoral and stromal is not beneficial for defining prognoses, since the presence of these cells is not associated with the patient’s stage. In our study, only the presence of CD8+ cells was significantly associated with lymph node metastases. The prognostic value of the obtained results can be enriched with an additional study of the lymphocyte phenotype, including B and other subtypes of T lymphocytes, NK cells, as well as molecules involved in the immune response, such as HLA subtypes.

Author Contributions

P.D.: methodology, writing—original draft preparation; M.V.-S.: data curation, writing—original draft preparation; V.S.: software visualization, investigation; I.H.: software, validation; A.Y.: supervision, writing—reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

1. Bulgarian National Science Fund: MeMoMi: Mechanisms of Modulating the immune response in the tumor and its Microenvironment for development of prognostic groups and optimizing the treatment algorithm in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. 2. European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme “Science and Education for Smart Growth”, with a leading organization MU-Pleven, grant no BG05M2OP001-1.002-0010-C01 (2018-2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Medical University Pleven (protocol code 656/29.06.2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study mittee of Medical University Pleven (number 656/29.06.2021).

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that all related data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tang, Y.; Zhang, A.X.J.; Chen, G.; Wu, Y.; Gu, W. Prognostic and therapeutic TILs of cervical cancer-Current advances and future perspectives. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2021, 22, 410–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kousar, K.; Ahmad, T.; Naseer, F.; Kakar, S.; Anjum, S. Review Article: Immune Landscape and Immunotherapy Options in Cervical Carcinoma. Cancers 2022, 14, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zou, R.; Gu, R.; Yu, X.; Hu, Y.; Yu, J.; Xue, X.; Zhu, X. Characteristics of Infiltrating Immune Cells and a Predictive Immune Model for Cervical Cancer. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 3501–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rs, J. The Immune Microenvironment in Human Papilloma Virus-Induced Cervical Lesions-Evidence for Estrogen as an Immunomodulator. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 649815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves Pembrolizumab Combination for the First-Line Treatment of Cervical Cancer. Available online: www.fda.gov (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  6. Furgiuele, S.; Descamps, G.; Lechien, J.R.; Dequanter, D.; Journe, F.; Saussez, S. Immunoscore Combining CD8, FoxP3, and CD68-Positive Cells Density and Distribution Predicts the Prognosis of Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Cells 2022, 11, 2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Liu, F.; Yang, K. Role of CD68 in tumor immunity and prognosis prediction in pan-cancer. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Raskov, H.; Orhan, A.; Christensen, J.P.; Gögenur, I. Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in cancer and cancer immunotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmed, H.; Mahmud, A.R.; Faijanur-Rob–Siddiquee, M.; Shahriar, A.; Biswas, P.; Shimul, E.K.; Ahmed, S.Z.; Ema, T.I.; Rahman, N.; Khan, A.; et al. Role of T cells in cancer immunotherapy: Opportunities and challenges. Cancer Pathog. Ther. 2023, 1, E003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Blessin, N.C.; Li, W.; Mandelkow, T.; Jansen, H.L.; Yang, C.; Raedler, J.B.; Simon, R.; Büscheck, F.; Dum, D.; Luebke, A.M.; et al. Prognostic role of proliferating CD8+ cytotoxic Tcells in human cancers. Cell Oncol. 2021, 44, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, R.; Gong, Y.; Zou, D.; Wang, L.; Yuan, L.; Zhou, Q. Correlation between subsets of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and risk stratification in patients with cervical cancer. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. 2018 FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics). Available online: https://www.figo.org/FIGO-globaldeclaration-hip (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  13. Dimitrova, P.D.; Popovska, S.L.; Ivanov, I.N. A study on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in different subtypes breast cancer. J. Biomed. Clin. Res. 2021, 14, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hao, N.B.; Lü, M.H.; Fan, Y.H.; Cao, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.R.; Yang, S.M. Macrophages in tumor microenvironments and the progression of tumors. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 948098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ruffell, B.; Affara, N.I.; Coussens, L.M. Differential macrophage programming in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2012, 33, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Raonic, J.; Lopicic, M.; Vuckovic, L.; Vucinic, J. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD68, CD4, CD8 and CD20 expression in cervical dysplasia and its relationship with HR-HPV infection. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 7598–7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, X.J.; Han, L.F.; Wu, X.G.; Wei, W.F.; Wu, L.F.; Yi, H.Y.; Yan, R.M.; Bai, X.Y.; Zhong, M.; Yu, Y.H.; et al. Clinical Significance of CD163+ and CD68+ Tumor-associated Macrophages in High-risk HPV-related Cervical Cancer. J. Cancer 2017, 8, 3868–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Horta, B.; Pereira, T.; Medeiros, R.; Cerqueira, F. Cervical Cancer Outcome and Tumor-Associated Macrophages: Research Evidence. Immuno 2022, 2, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Davidson, B.; Goldberg, I.; Gotlieb, W.; Lerner-Geva, L.; Ben-Baruch, G.; Agulansky, L.; Novikov, I.; Kopolovic, J. Macrophage Infiltration and Angiogenesis in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinomaclinicopathologic Correlation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1999, 78, 240–244. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hammes, L.S.; Tekmal, R.R.; Naud, P.; Edelweiss, M.I.; Kirma, H.; Valente, P.T.; Syrjänen, K.J.; Cunha-Filho, J.S. Macrophages Inflammation and Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Progression—Clinicopathological Correlation. Gynecol. Oncol. 2007, 105, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davidson, B.; Goldberg, I.; Kopolovic, J. Inflammatory Response in Cervicallntraepithelial Neoplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1997, 193, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.; Huang, G.; Zhang, S. Associations between Intratumoral and Peritumoral M2 Macrophage Counts and Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion Patterns. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 139, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, F.; Kong, W.; Zhao, G.; Cheng, Z.; Ai, L.; Lv, J.; Feng, Y.; Ma, X. The Correlation between Tumor-Associated Macrophage Infiltration and Progression in Cervical Carcinoma. Biosci. Rep. 2021, 2016, 9720912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Singh, S.; Mehta, N.; Lilan, J.; Budhthoki, M.B.; Chao, F.; Yong, L. Initiative Action of Tumor-Associated Macrophage during Tumor Metastasis. Biochim. Open 2017, 4, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Peranzoni, E.; Lemoine, J.; Vimeux, L.; Donnadieu, E. Macrophages impede CD8 T cells from reaching tumor cells and limit the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E4041–E4050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, Q.; Steger, A.; Mahner, S.; Jeschke, U.; Heidegger, H. The Formation and Therapeutic Update of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Salgado, R.; Denkert, C.; Demaria, S.; Sirtaine, N.; Klausche, F.; Pruneri, G.; Wienert, S.; Van den Eynden, G.; Baehner, F.L.; Penault-Llorca, F.; et al. International TILs Working Group 2014. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: Recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bernsmeier, C.; van der Merwe, S.; Périanin, A. Innate immune cells in cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 186–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bruns, H.; Büttner, M.; Fabri, M.; Mougiakakos, D.; Bittenbring, J.T.; Hoffmann, M.H.; Beier, F.; Pasemann, S.; Jitschi, R.; Hofmann, A.D.; et al. Vitamin D-dependent induction of cathelicidin in human macrophages results in cytotoxicity against high-grade B cell lymphoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 282ra47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hao, S.; Meng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Nie, X.; Wu, F.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Gu, N.; Xu, H. Macrophage phenotypic mechanomodulation of enhancing bone regeneration by superparamagnetic scaffold upon magnetization. Biomaterials 2017, 140, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stone, S.C.; Rossetti, R.A.M.; Alvarez, K.L.F.; Carvalho, J.P.; Margarido, P.F.R.; Baracat, E.C.; Tacla, M.; Boccardo, E.; Yokochi, K.; Lorenzi, N.P.; et al. Lactate secreted by cervical cancer cells modulates macrophage phenotype. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 1041–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, W.F.; Lee, C.N.; Chang, M.C.; Su, Y.N.; Chen, C.A.; Hsieh, C.Y. Antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes generated from a DNA vaccine control tumors through the Fas-FasL pathway. Mol. Ther. 2005, 12, 960–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ivanova, O.K.; Sharapova, T.N.; Romanova, E.A.; Soshnikova, N.V.; Sashchenko, L.P.; Yashin, D.V. CD3+ CD8+ NKG2D+ T lymphocytes induce apoptosis and necroptosis in HLA-negative cells via FasL-Fas interaction. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 118, 3359–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Maskey, N.; Thapa, N.; Maharjan, M.; Shrestha, G.; Maharjan, N.; Cai, H.; Liu, S. Infiltrating CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes in HPV infected uterine cervical milieu. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 7647–7655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Brito, M.J.; Sequeira, P.; Silva, I.; Quintas, A.; Martins, C.; Félix, A. CD4+ and CD8+ cell populations in HIV-positive women with cervical squamous intra-epithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 103, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Origoni, M.; Parma, M.; Dell’Antonio, G.; Gelardi, C.; Stefani, C.; Salvatore, S.; Candiani, M. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical phenotypes in patients treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 831907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Øvestad, I.T.; Gudlaugsson, E.; Skaland, I.; Malpica, A.; Kruse, A.J.; Janssen, E.A.M.; Baak, J.P.A. Local immune response in the microenvironment of CIN2-3 with and without spontaneous regression. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kang, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Cheng, Q.; Zhang, Y. Integrated Analysis of Immune Infiltration Features for Cervical Carcinoma and Their Associated Immunotherapeutic Responses. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 573497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, D.; Sarkar, B.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Banerjee, C.; Mondal, S.B. An Altered Ratio of CD4+ And CD8+ T Lymphocytes in Cervical Cancer Tissues and Peripheral Blood—A Prognostic Clue? Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2018, 19, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sheu, B.C.; Hsu, S.M.; Ho, H.N.; Lin, R.H.; Torng, P.L.; Huang, S.C. Reversed CD4/CD8 ratios of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with the progression of human cervical carcinoma. Cancer 1999, 86, 1537–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Monnier-Benoit, S.; Mauny, F.; Riethmuller, D.; Guerrini, J.S.; Căpîlna, M.; Félix, S.; Seillès, E.; Mougin, C.; Prétet, J.L. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets in high risk human papillomavirus-associated pre-malignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 2006, 102, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shah, W.; Yan, X.; Jing, L.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y. A reversed CD4/CD8 ratio of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high percentage of CD4(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells are significantly associated with clinical outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2011, 8, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fan, J.T.; Liao, Y.; Si, X.H.; Geng, X.L.; Wei, W.; Xie, Q.L. Expression of HLA-I, CD8, and CD4 and Their Clinical Significance in Cervical Cancer. World J. Oncol. 2011, 2, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Chen, Z.; Ding, J.; Pang, N.; Du, R.; Meng, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Ding, Y. The Th17/Treg balance and the expression of related cytokines in Uygur cervical cancer patients. Diagn. Pathol. 2013, 8, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kurmyshkina, O.V.; Kovchur, P.I.; Schegoleva, L.V.; Volkova, T.O. T- and NK-cell populations with regulatory phenotype and markers of apoptosis in circulating lymphocytes of patients with CIN3 or microcarcinoma of the cervix: Evidence for potential mechanisms of immune suppression. Infect. Agents Cancer 2017, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Nedergaard, B.S.; Ladekarl, M.; Thomsen, H.F.; Nyengaard, J.R.; Nielsen, K. Low density of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells is associated with increased risk of relapse in squamous cell cervical cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 97, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, L.; Mao, Z.; Lai, Y.; Wan, T.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, B. A review of the research progress in T-lymphocyte immunity and cervical cancer. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 2026–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 59 00728 g001 550
Figure 1. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD8+ T-lymphocyte subtypes (colored brownish) in tonsil—×200 (a), ×400 (b).
Figure 1. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD8+ T-lymphocyte subtypes (colored brownish) in tonsil—×200 (a), ×400 (b).
Medicina 59 00728 g001
Medicina 59 00728 g002 550
Figure 2. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD68+ macrophages (colored brownish) in tonsil—×200 (a), ×400 (b).
Figure 2. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD68+ macrophages (colored brownish) in tonsil—×200 (a), ×400 (b).
Medicina 59 00728 g002
Medicina 59 00728 g003 550
Figure 3. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD8+ T-lymphocyte subtypes (colored brownish) in CC—low intratumoral and stromal (a), low intratumoral and high stromal (b), high intratumoral and stromal (c) and high intratumoral and low stromal (d) concentration of positive cells, ×400.
Figure 3. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD8+ T-lymphocyte subtypes (colored brownish) in CC—low intratumoral and stromal (a), low intratumoral and high stromal (b), high intratumoral and stromal (c) and high intratumoral and low stromal (d) concentration of positive cells, ×400.
Medicina 59 00728 g003
Medicina 59 00728 g004 550
Figure 4. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD68+ macrophages (colored brownish) in CC—low intratumoral and stromal (a), low intratumoral and high stromal (b), high intratumoral and stromal (c) and high intratumoral and low stromal (d) concentration of positive cells, ×400.
Figure 4. Microscopic evaluation of IHC-stained CD68+ macrophages (colored brownish) in CC—low intratumoral and stromal (a), low intratumoral and high stromal (b), high intratumoral and stromal (c) and high intratumoral and low stromal (d) concentration of positive cells, ×400.
Medicina 59 00728 g004
Medicina 59 00728 g005 550
Figure 5. Fisher’s test for the association between (A) intratumor CD8 expression and N status; (B) intratumor CD8 expression and FIGO stage; (C) Stromal CD8 expression and N status; (D) stromal CD8 expression and FIGO stage.
Figure 5. Fisher’s test for the association between (A) intratumor CD8 expression and N status; (B) intratumor CD8 expression and FIGO stage; (C) Stromal CD8 expression and N status; (D) stromal CD8 expression and FIGO stage.
Medicina 59 00728 g005
Medicina 59 00728 g006 550
Figure 6. Fisher’s test for the association between (A) intratumor CD68 expression and N status; (B) intratumor CD68 expression and FIGO stage; (C) Stromal CD68 expression and N status; (D) stromal CD68 expression and FIGO stage.
Figure 6. Fisher’s test for the association between (A) intratumor CD68 expression and N status; (B) intratumor CD68 expression and FIGO stage; (C) Stromal CD68 expression and N status; (D) stromal CD68 expression and FIGO stage.
Medicina 59 00728 g006
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of patients.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients.
Patients CharacteristicsN%
FIGO 11318.06
FIGO 21216.66
FIGO 34765.28
N02534.72
N14765.28
Total72100
Table
Table 2. Supplies used.
Table 2. Supplies used.
Primary
Antibody		CloneCompanySolutionsVisualization SystemPlatformCellular Specificity
CD8, MoC8/144B,
Isotype: IgG1, kappa		Dako, Agilent, Glostrup, DenmarkReady to useEnVision™ FLEX, High pH, (Link), DAKOAutostainerLink 48, DAKOCytotoxic T cells
CD68, MoPG-M1,
Isotype: IgG3, kappa		Dako, Agilent, Glostrup, DenmarkReady to useEnVision™ FLEX, High pH, (Link), DAKOAutostainerLink 48, DAKOMacrophages
Table
Table 3. External control tissues used and IHC expression pattern established for respective antibodies.
Table 3. External control tissues used and IHC expression pattern established for respective antibodies.
Primary AntibodyControl TissueReaction Location in the CellsPositive Quality Control
CD8TonsilMembrane and/or cytoplasmModerate to strong intensity of expression in T cells of the interfollicular areas; expression is absent in B cells and germinal centers
CD68TonsilCytoplasmModerate to strong intensity of expression in germinal center’s macrophages
Table
Table 4. Distribution of patients according to FIGO stage and immunohistochemical findings.
Table 4. Distribution of patients according to FIGO stage and immunohistochemical findings.
Stage
Histologic
Results		FIGO Stage IFIGO Stage IIFIGO Stage III
Intratumoral CD8
missing012
low concentration6738
high concentration747
Stromal CD8
missing001
low concentration7725
high concentration6521
Intratumoral CD68
missing001
low concentration7937
high concentration639
Stromal CD68
missing000
low concentration11625
high concentration2622
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dimitrova, P.; Vasileva-Slaveva, M.; Shivarov, V.; Hasan, I.; Yordanov, A. Infiltration by Intratumor and Stromal CD8 and CD68 in Cervical Cancer. Medicina 2023, 59, 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040728

AMA Style

Dimitrova P, Vasileva-Slaveva M, Shivarov V, Hasan I, Yordanov A. Infiltration by Intratumor and Stromal CD8 and CD68 in Cervical Cancer. Medicina. 2023; 59(4):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dimitrova, Polina, Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva, Velizar Shivarov, Ihsan Hasan, and Angel Yordanov. 2023. "Infiltration by Intratumor and Stromal CD8 and CD68 in Cervical Cancer" Medicina 59, no. 4: 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040728

APA Style

Dimitrova, P., Vasileva-Slaveva, M., Shivarov, V., Hasan, I., & Yordanov, A. (2023). Infiltration by Intratumor and Stromal CD8 and CD68 in Cervical Cancer. Medicina, 59(4), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040728

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop