Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Diabetic Foot
Next Article in Special Issue
The Future of Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care Medicine as a Medical Science: A Call to Action
Previous Article in Journal
Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Liver with Good Response to Carboplatin and 5-Flurouracil: A Case Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Brief History of Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care Medicine in the United States
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Developing Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care Intensivists: A Case for Distinct Training

Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1865; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121865
by Rafal Kopanczyk 1,*, Micah T. Long 2, Sree V. Satyapriya 1, Amar M. Bhatt 1 and Michael Lyaker 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1865; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121865
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 17 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care: A Future of Distinction)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The main question and topic of this article is the need for standardization and improvement of the cardiothoracic intensive care medicine subspecialization program. Considering the progress of cardiothoracic surgery and the procedures and devices that are used in cardiothoracic intensive care medicine, authors in this article describe current education of cardiothoracic critical care intensivists and propose a new program for this subspecialization.

The article is very interesting and important for all employees in cardiac intensive care units: new solutions related to medical training are offered. The solutions are well explained and argued. The article offers new, different solutions for this subspecialization.  The article is well written, the text is clear and easy to read. The conclusions are clear and they answer the questions posed in the text.  

Author Response

We thank Reviewer 1 for their comments. We are grateful for their time and interest. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

I appreciate a great opportunity to review your new manuscript.

Overall it is an interesting, well-written paper.

I would consider to add some new publication to references and discussion part -.

1. DJ Kim ER al Korean J Thorac Cardiovascular Surg 2020

2. HY Wu et al J Chinese Med Assoc 2018

Author Response

We thank Reviewer 2 for their insightful comments. Suggested references have been added. They are numbered as reference #25 and reference # 26. Please see Tracked Version highlighted in red. 

Back to TopTop