Next Article in Journal
Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection Presenting as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy in a Young AIDS Patient
Next Article in Special Issue
Psychological Health and Diabetes Self-Management among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes during COVID-19 in the Southwest of Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Dimethylarginines in Children after Anti-Neoplastic Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inherited/Genetically-Associated Pheochromocytoma/ Paraganglioma Syndromes and COVID-19
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Experimental and Emerging Free Fatty Acid Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

by
Angelo Maria Patti
1,†,
Rosaria Vincenza Giglio
2,†,
Nikolaos Papanas
3,†,
Dragos Serban
4,†,
Anca Pantea Stoian
5,
Kalliopi Pafili
3,
Khalid Al Rasadi
6,
Kanya Rajagopalan
7,
Ali A. Rizvi
7,8,*,
Marcello Ciaccio
2,9 and
Manfredi Rizzo
1,5,8
1
Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
3
Diabetes Centre, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68132 Alexandroupolis, Greece
4
Forth Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
5
Department of Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Carol Davila University, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
6
Medical Research Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman
7
Department of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL 32827, USA
8
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
9
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, 90127 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the present work.
Medicina 2022, 58(1), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010109
Submission received: 13 December 2021 / Revised: 8 January 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 11 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endocrinology in the Time of COVID-19)

Abstract

:
The current management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) includes incretin-based treatments able to enhance insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity as well as improve body mass, inflammation, plasma lipids, blood pressure, and cardiovascular outcomes. Dietary Free Fatty Acids (FFA) regulate metabolic and anti-inflammatory processes through their action on incretins. Selective synthetic ligands for FFA1-4 receptors have been developed as potential treatments for T2DM. To comprehensively review the available evidence for the potential role of FFA receptor agonists in the treatment of T2DM, we performed an electronic database search assessing the association between FFAs, T2DM, inflammation, and incretins. Evidence indicates that FFA1-4 agonism increases insulin sensitivity, induces body mass loss, reduces inflammation, and has beneficial metabolic effects. There is a strong inter-relationship between FFAs and incretins. FFA receptor agonism represents a potential target for the treatment of T2DM and may provide an avenue for the management of cardiometabolic risk in susceptible individuals. Further research promises to shed more light on this emerging topic.

1. Introduction

Free Fatty Acids (FFA) are energy substrates that play an important role in various biological processes. FFAs are distinguished based on their chain length. Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA) have 1–6 carbon atoms, Medium-Chain Fatty Acids (MCFA) possess 7–12 carbon atoms, while those with more than 12 carbon atoms are designated as Long-Chain Fatty Acids (LCFAs) [1,2]. Medium- and Long-Chain FFAs are derived from dietary triglycerides, while Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA) are produced by intestinal microbial fermentation of indigestible dietary fiber [1]. FFAs also serve as natural ligands for a group of orphan G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) called Free Fatty Acid Receptors (FFARs), which intertwine metabolism and immunity via the regulation of inflammation and the secretion of peptide hormones [3].
Several FFARs activated by FFAs of various chain lengths have been identified and characterized. FFAR1 (GPR40) and FFAR4 (GPR120) are activated by long-chain saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, while FFAR3 (GPR41) and FFAR2 (GPR43) are activated by acetate, butyrate, and propionate [3]. Synthetic ligands, selective for FFA1-4 receptors, have been developed as potential treatments for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Fasiglifam, an FFA1 agonist, has been shown to improve glycemic control and reduce Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in patients with T2DM, without an increased risk of hypoglycemia [4]. FFA4 agonism increases insulin sensitivity, induces body mass loss, and reduces inflammation. The metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects of SCFA are linked to the activation of FFA2 and FFA3 [3,4].
T2DM and its related complications represent a major global health challenge with an increasing impact due to the current COronaVIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic [5,6]. There is a need for novel approaches in the treatment of T2DM, particularly with COVID-19 as a persistent accentuating factor [7,8,9]. We performed an electronic database search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS) assessing the association between FFA, T2DM, inflammation, and incretin-based therapies. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive review of available evidence on the potential role of FFAR agonists (FFA-RAs) in the treatment of T2DM.

2. Free Fatty Acids, Glucose Metabolism, and Type 2 Diabetes

Dietary FFAs, including omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to modulate the metabolic and inflammatory processes associated with T2DM [2]. Many of the biological effects of FFAs have been attributed to GPCRs; the most characterized FFARs are the two LCFA-specific ones, FFA1 and FFA4, and the SCFA-specific receptors FFA2 and FFA3. FFAR agonism has been shown to have beneficial metabolic actions, and drug development selective to FFA agonists has potential benefits as novel clinical treatments for T2DM [2]. The omega-3 fatty acids obtained from fish oils and the SCFAs derived from the fermentation of dietary fiber have effects on the metabolic and inflammatory processes associated with obesity and T2DM, which are attributable to the activation of FFA1-4 receptors [10].
FFA1 receptor agonism enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from the pancreas and complete agonists of this receptor increase incretin release from the intestine, thereby enhancing pancreatic insulin secretion and promoting satiety [11]. FFA4 agonism has an anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages, which can improve systemic sensitivity to insulin, while also additionally releasing incretin from the intestine [1]. FFA2 and FFA3 receptors are linked to the beneficial metabolic effects associated with probiotics in the intestine, with the release of incretin from entero-endocrine cells and both systemic anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory effects [12].

2.1. Free Fatty Acids 1 (FFA1)

FFA1 are activated by various saturated, monounsaturated, and long-chain polyunsaturated FFAs and are coupled with Gq/11 expressed in pancreatic beta cells (associated with increased Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion—GSIS) [13], and alpha cells producing glucagon within the pancreas [14]. FFA1 is expressed by enteroendocrine cells by regulating the release of incretin hormones, such as Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Cholecystokinin (CCK) [15]. The observed effects of FFA1 on pancreatic beta cell viability have been controversial, with pancreatic-specific FFA1 overexpression associated with disrupted islet morphology and impaired beta cell function, while FFA1 disruption being linked to increased viability of beta cells in mice fed a high-fiber diet (HFD) [16].
The ability of synthetic FFA1 agonists to induce incretin release depends on whether the compound is a partial or complete agonist [17]. Patients treated with fasiglifam, an orally available FFA1 agonist [18], have shown reduced blood glucose levels, increased insulin levels, and lower HbA1c levels [19], with significantly fewer side effects than traditional glucose-lowering therapies. There were no significant increases in body mass, with a concomitant reduction in hypoglycemia [19], insulin resistance, and glucagon secretion in response to fasiglifam treatment in patients with T2DM [20,21]. A diagrammatic summary of the actions of FFAR agonists is depicted in Figure 1.

2.2. Free Fatty Acids 4 (FFA4)

FFA4 is expressed in enteroendocrine cells, lungs, brain, white adipose tissue, heart, and liver [2]. Within adipose tissue, the activation of FFA4 in adipocytes is associated with an increase in adipogenesis and glucose uptake [22], promoting adiposity and obesity. FFA4 agonism is associated with improved insulin sensitivity [23]. Increased insulin secretion, satiety, and improved glycemic control have been attributed to FFA4-dependent release of GLP-1 from entero-endocrine cells. FFA4 also co-localizes with ghrelin, inhibiting its secretion [24]. Reduced levels of FFA4 mRNA have been found in the pancreatic islets of individuals with diabetes and prediabetes, demonstrating an attenuation of the protective effects of ω-3 fatty acids, such as eicosapentaenoic acid against palmitate-induced cell apoptosis [25], and inhibition of glucose-dependent somatostatin release and regulation of glucagon secretion [26].
FFA4 expression in macrophages increases in response to obesity. The anti-inflammatory effects are largely associated with FFA4-mediated recruitment of β-arrestin 2, activation of FFA4 reduced pro-inflammatory gene expression in M1 macrophages, and increased expression of M2 anti-inflammatory genes with reduced tissue macrophage infiltration of adipocytes [27]. FFA4 has been associated with the anti-inflammatory effects of ω-3 and ω-9 fatty acids in the hypothalamus, reducing diet-induced inflammation and body adiposity [28]. Thus, they have great potential for the treatment of metabolic diseases. However, despite their positive pleiotropic effects, there is a paucity of studies in the clinical use of FFA4 agonists. [29].

3. The Relationship between Free Fatty Acids and Incretins

Incretin-based therapies with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (RAs) and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors improve insulin secretion and/or peripheral insulin sensitivity in patients with T2DM [30,31,32]. The inter-relationship between FFAs and incretins, as well as the physiologic roles of FFA receptors, remain to be fully elucidated. The clinical pharmacology of FFAs and challenges in their use as potential therapeutic options for T2DM are currently under extensive investigation [33,34].
The beneficial effects mediated by SCFA on body mass and glucose homeostasis are due to the increased secretion of incretins, such as GLP-1, Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP), and Peptide YY (PYY), through mechanisms partly dependent on FFA2/FFA3 [35]. It is hoped that the development of more potent and selective FFA2 and FFA3 agonists will facilitate elucidation of the metabolic effects of FFA2 and FFA3 and provide future treatments for T2DM. The role of the FFARs in improving glucose uptake, decreasing colon motility and contractility, increased GLP-1 secretion, and inhibition of leukocyte activation is being investigated [36]. Although a series of selective compounds are on the horizon, their clinical use has been limited due to low solubility and poor pharmacokinetics [37]. Table 1 shows the prominent actions of FFAs on glucose metabolism and the incretin pathway.

4. Therapeutic Avenues

In a double-blind, randomized phase 1 study in patients with T2DM, fasiglifam showed a significant lowering in fasting glucose from baseline (up to 93 mg/dL), while the post-challenge glucose during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) fell by an average of 172 mg/dL) [38]. In a larger phase 2 T2DM study, fasiglifam at a dose of 50–200 mg revealed a blood glucose lowering effect similar to that of glimepiride 4 mg, showing a decrease in HbA1c of approximately 1%. In both studies, hypoglycemic events during treatment were similar in the fasiglifam and placebo groups (2% vs. 3%), but lower than in the comparator group treated with glimepiride (19%) [39]. In another phase 3 study lasting 24 weeks, the mean changes of HbA1c from baseline in the placebo group (0.16%), and in the groups receiving fasiglifam at 25 mg (−0.57%) and fasiglifam at 50 mg (−0.83%) suggested that the latter held great potential for the treatment of T2DM [40]. Unfortunately, there are no other studies in the literature in diabetic patients treated with FFA-RA; however, pivotal studies in animals demonstrate similar effects to the findings mentioned above.
Several hypothetical avenues have also been proposed for the development of clinical treatments based on FFA receptor agonism, including the co-therapeutic approaches involving FFA receptor agonists and current T2DM therapies. AS2575959, an FFA1 agonist, acts synergistically with a DPP-IV inhibitor to improve glucose homeostasis [41]; Fasiglifam and metformin showed enhanced antidiabetic effects in association with each other [42]; DS-1558, an FFA1 agonist, acts synergistically with exendin-4 to improve glucose homeostasis in diabetic mice [43]; metabolic effects with dapagliflozin plus long-acting exenatide (LAR) include less FFA suppression than placebo during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), suggesting compensatory lipid mobilization for energy production when glucose availability was reduced due to glucosuria [44].
In a similar fashion, the GLP-1RA liraglutide reduces fat-induced lipid formation and exhibits a protective effect against lipotoxicity-induced oxidative stress [45]. The latter seems to have a significant relevance, since liraglutide has the potential to reduce oxidative stress in T2DM after only few weeks of treatment [46]. In addition, liraglutide can quickly reduce atherogenic small, dense LDL particles in such patients [47,48], while some traditional anti-antidiabetic agents and even few statins did not show a similar favorable effect on LDL subclass distribution [49,50]; yet, for statins, the duration of therapy is critical in order to show full cardio-renal benefit [51,52]. These observations have led to the hypothesis that liraglutide and other incretin-based drugs have a direct anti-atherogenic action in T2DM, reducing atherosclerosis formation and progression [46], which in turn could be one the main underlying mechanisms explaining the beneficial effect of these novel antidiabetic agents on cardiovascular events and mortality in type-2 diabetic patients [53]. These actions augment those of FFAs, and a synergistic effect is expected, though not proven, when both are used in combination.
Regulation of FFA in relation to metabolic factors were also investigated in drug naive subjects with T2DM who were treated with 50–100 mg of canagliflozin, a sodium–glucose transporter-2 agent, as monotherapy for 3 months [54]. Metabolic parameters were compared between groups with low FFA and high FFA. Groups with higher FFA had greater degrees of HbA1c reduction and increases in insulin, along with significant reductions of non-HDL-C, UA, and adipo-IR. Body mass and whole-body insulin resistance were also decreased in those with elevated FFA, though better glycemic control along with increased beta cell function and decreased atherogenic cholesterol were seen in those with reduced FFA [54].
The relationship between FFAs and diabetes is in the process of being elucidated. The plasma of patients with T2DM show an increased concentration of atherogenic small, dense low-density lipoproteins (sdLDL), placing them at higher cardiovascular risk [55,56,57] particularly in those populations where there is a strong genetic heritage [58,59,60]. These lipoprotein particles are easily oxidized in the arterial intima [61], initiating a key pathophysiologic mechanism in the atherosclerotic cascade that is enhanced in the presence of inflammation and altered endothelium [46]. Notably, in patients with T2DM, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and atherosclerosis are closely linked to changes in cytokine biomarkers [62,63] and increased sdLDL [64].
In a recent study, Ha and colleagues reported that FFAs and docking protein 1 (DOK1) were associated with insulin resistance in patients with T2DM, even in the absence of obesity and prediabetes [65]. They speculated that DOK1 downregulation might inhibit lipid synthesis, thus induce lipolysis and possibly worsening insulin resistance. These complex metabolic pathways represent fertile targets for innovative therapeutic interventions, possibly involving the use of FFAR agonists. Key safety monitoring processes in clinical trials were able to detect the rare but serious liver toxicity signals; however, leading to timely termination [66,67]. Table 2 shows a summary of seminal trials evaluating the effectiveness of FFA receptor agonists alone and in combination with other glucose-lowering agents.

5. Conclusions

Evidence to-date indicates that the development of treatments based on FFARs agonism could provide a new and novel way to treat T2DM. Further studies may assess whether there are relationships between physical activity (e.g., resistance training, high-intensity interval training, or aerobics) and FFA1-4; since the evidence indicates its effects on insulin sensitivity and inflammation, this may represent another line of research. However, it is imperative that the safety profile of FFAR agonists be fully evaluated. As a case in point, the clinical trial program of fasiglifam has been terminated due to liver toxicity [66,67]. Pre-clinical and clinical studies with these agents are, therefore, essential. Studies conducted in diabetic patients with features of metabolic syndrome, such as obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, will also assess the efficacy and safety of these agents in subjects in need of cardiometabolic risk reduction.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

This article has been written independently and solely reflects the opinion of the authors. Nikolaos Papanas has been an advisory board member of TrigoCare International, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Elpen, MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda; he has participated in sponsored studies by Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; he has received honoraria as a speaker for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Elpen, Galenica, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, and Vianex; and has attended conferences sponsored by TrigoCare International, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis. Anca Pantea Stoian is currently Vice President of Romanian National Diabetes Committee and she has given lectures, received honoraria, and research support, and participated in conferences, advisory boards, and clinical trials sponsored by many companies, including AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Coca-Cola, Medtronic, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi. Manfredi Rizzo is former Director, Clinical Medical and Regulatory Department, Novo Nordisk Europe East and South and he has given lectures, received honoraria, and research support, and participated in conferences, advisory boards and clinical trials sponsored by many pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kowa, Eli Lilly, Meda, Mylan, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Servier. None of the above mentioned companies had any role in this article, which has been written independently, without any financial or professional help, and reflects only the opinion of the authors, without any role of the industry.

References

  1. Watterson, K.R.; Hudson, B.D.; Ulven, T.; Milligan, G. Treatment of type 2 diabetes by free Fatty Acid receptor agonists. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Offermanns, S. Free fatty acid (FFA) and hydroxycarboxylic acid (HCA) receptors. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2014, 54, 407–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Grundmann, M.; Bender, E.; Schamberger, J.; Eitner, F. Pharmacology of Free Fatty Acid Receptors and Their Allosteric Modulators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kimura, I.; Ichimura, A.; Ohue-Kitano, R.; Igarashi, M. Free Fatty Acid Receptors in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2020, 100, 171–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stoian, A.P.; Banerjee, Y.; Rizvi, A.A.; Rizzo, M. Diabetes and the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Insights from Recent Experience Might Guide Future Management. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2020, 18, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lim, S.; Bae, J.H.; Kwon, H.S.; Nauck, M.A. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: From pathophysiology to clinical management. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ceriello, A.; Stoian, A.P.; Rizzo, M. COVID-19 and diabetes management: What should be considered? Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 163, 108151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al Mahmeed, W.; Al-Rasadi, K.; Banerjee, Y.; Ceriello, A.; Cosentino, F.; Galia, M.; Goh, S.Y.; Kempler, P.; Lessan, N.; Papanas, N.; et al. CArdiometabolic Panel of International experts on Syndemic COvid-19 (CAPISCO). Promoting a Syndemic Approach for Cardiometabolic Disease Management During COVID-19: The CAPISCO International Expert Panel. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 787761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rizvi, A.A.; Janez, A.; Al Mahmeed, W.; Rizzo, M. Diabetes and COVID-19: A Tale of 2 Pandemics. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 78, e1–e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nogal, A.; Valdes, A.M.; Menni, C. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay be-tween gut microbiota and diet in cardio-metabolic health. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1897212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, C.; Li, H.; Long, Y.Q. GPR40 agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: The biological characteristics and the chemical space. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 5603–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Moniri, N.H.; Farah, Q. Short-chain free-fatty acid G protein-coupled receptors in colon cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 186, 114483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qian, J.; Gu, Y.; Wu, C.; Yu, F.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yao, X.; Bei, C.; Zhu, Q. Agonist-induced activation of human FFA1 receptor signals to extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 through Gq- and Gi-coupled signaling cascades. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2017, 22, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xiong, Y.; Swaminath, G.; Cao, Q.; Yang, L.; Guo, Q.; Salomonis, H.; Lu, J.; Houze, J.B.; Dransfield, P.J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Activation of FFA1 mediates GLP-1 secretion in mice. Evidence for allosterism at FFA1. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013, 369, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gribble, F.M.; Diakogiannaki, E.; Reimann, F. Gut Hormone Regulation and Secretion via FFA1 and FFA4. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017, 236, 181–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ježek, P.; Jabůrek, M.; Holendová, B.; Plecitá-Hlavatá, L. Fatty Acid-Stimulated Insulin Secretion vs. Lipotoxicity. Molecules 2018, 23, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Goldspink, D.A.; Lu, V.B.; Billing, L.J.; Larraufie, P.; Tolhurst, G.; Gribble, F.M.; Reimann, F. Mechanistic insights into the detection of free fatty and bile acids by ileal glucagon-like peptide-1 secreting cells. Mol. Metab. 2018, 7, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marcinak, J.; Cao, C.; Lee, D.; Ye, Z. Fasiglifam for glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: A phase III.; placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017, 19, 1714–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mancini, A.D.; Poitout, V. The fatty acid receptor FFA1/GPR40 a decade later: How much do we know? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 24, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Burant, C.F. Activation of GPR40 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of type 2 diabtes. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Poitout, V.; Lin, D.C. Modulating GPR40: Therapeutic promise and potential in diabetes. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cornall, L.M.; Mathai, M.L.; Hryciw, D.H.; McAinch, A.J. GPR120 agonism as a counter measure against metabolic diseases. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 670–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ichimura, A.; Hirasawa, A.; Poulain-Godefroy, O.; Bonnefond, A.; Hara, T.; Yengo, L.; Kimura, I.; Leloire, A.; Liu, N.; Iida, K.; et al. Dysfunction of lipid sensor GPR120 leads to obesity in both mouse and human. Nature 2012, 483, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gong, Z.; Yoshimura, M.; Aizawa, S.; Kurotani, R.; Zigman, J.M.; Sakai, T.; Sakata, I. G protein coupled receptor 120 signaling regulates ghrelin secretion in vivo and in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 306, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Taneera, J.; Lang, S.; Sharma, A.; Fadista, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ahlqvist, E.; Jonsson, A.; Lyssenko, V.; Vikman, P.; Hansson, O.; et al. A systems genetics approach identifies genes and pathways for type 2 diabetes in human islets. Cell Metab. 2012, 16, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Stone, V.M.; Dhayal, S.; Brocklehurst, K.J.; Lenaghan, C.; Sörhede Winzell, M.; Hammar, M.; Xu, X.; Smith, D.M.; Morgan, N.G. GPR120 (FFgAR4) is preferentially expressed in pancreatic delta cells and regulates somatostatin secretion from murine islets of Langerhans. Diabetologia 2014, 57, 1182–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Oh, D.Y.; Talukdar, S.; Bae, E.J.; Imamura, T.; Morinaga, H.; Fan, W.; Li, P.; Lu, W.J.; Watkins, S.M.; Olefsky, J.M. GPR120 is an omega-3 fatty acid receptor mediating potent anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing effects. Cell 2010, 142, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wellhauser, L.; Belsham, D.D. Activation of the omega-3 fatty acid receptor GPR120 medi-ates anti-inflammatory actions in immortalized hypothalamic neurons. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Halder, S.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, R. The therapeutic potential of GPR120: A patent review. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2013, 23, 1581–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nauck, M.A.; Quast, D.R.; Wefers, J.; Pfeiffer, A.F.H. The evolving story of incretins (GIP and GLP-1) in metabolic and cardiovascular disease: A pathophysiological update. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2021, 23, 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sachinidis, A.; Nikolic, D.; Stoian, A.P.; Papanas, N.; Tarar, O.; Rizvi, A.A.; Rizzo, M. Cardiovascular outcomes trials with incretin-based medications: A critical review of data available on GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors. Metabolism 2020, 111, 154343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Stoian, A.P.; Papanas, N.; Prazny, M.; Rizvi, A.A.; Rizzo, M. Incretin-Based Therapies Role in COVID-19 Era: Evolving Insights. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 25, 494–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, Z.; Qiu, Q.; Geng, X.; Yang, J.; Huang, W.; Qian, H. Free fatty acid receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Drugs in preclinical to phase II clinical development. Exp. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2016, 25, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ghislain, J.; Poitout, V. Targeting lipid GPCRs to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus—Progress and challenges. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cani, P.D.; Everard, A.; Duparc, T. Gut microbiota, enteroendocrine functions and metabolism. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2013, 13, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ulven, T. Short-chain free fatty acid receptors FFA2/GPR43 and FFA3/GPR41 as new potential therapeutic targets. Front. Endocrinol. 2012, 3, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, Y.; Jiao, X.; Kayser, F.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wanska, M.; Greenberg, J.; Weiszmann, J.; Ge, H.; Tian, H.; et al. The first synthetic agonists of FFA2: Discovery and Sar of phenylacetamide as allosteric modulators. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Leifke, E.; Naik, H.; Wu, J.; Viswanathan, P.; Demanno, D.; Kipnes, M.; Vakilynejad, M. A Multiple-Ascending-Dose Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a Novel GPR40 Agonist, TAK-875, in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 92, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Burant, C.F.; Viswanathan, P.; Marcinak, J.; Cao, C.; Vakilynejad, M.; Xie, B.; Leifke, E. TAK-875 versus placebo or glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2012, 379, 1403–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kaku, K.; Enya, K.; Nakaya, R.; Ohira, T.; Matsuno, R. Efficacy and safety of fasiglifam (TAK-875), a G protein-coupled receptor 40 agonist, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2015, 17, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tanaka, H.; Yoshida, S.; Minoura, H.; Negoro, K.; Shimaya, A.; Shimokawa, T.; Shibasaki, M. Novel GPR40 agonist AS2575959 exhibits glucose metabolism improve-ment and synergistic effect with sitagliptin on insulin and incretin secretion. Life Sci. 2014, 94, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ito, R.; Tsujihata, Y.; Matsuda-Nagasumi, K.; Mori, I.; Negoro, N.; Takeuchi, K. Tak-875, a GPR40/FFAR1 agonist, in combination with metformin prevents progression of diabetes and beta-cell dysfunction in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 170, 568–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Nakashima, R.; Yano, T.; Ogawa, J.; Tanaka, N.; Toda, N.; Yoshida, M.; Takano, R.; Inoue, M.; Honda, T.; Kume, S.; et al. Potentiation of insulin secretion and improvement of glucose intolerance by combining a novel G protein-coupled receptor 40 agonist DS-1558 with glucagon-like peptide-1receptor agonists. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 737, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pereira, M.J.; Lundkvist, P.; Kamble, P.G.; Lau, J.; Martins, J.G.; Sjöström, C.D.; Schnecke, V.; Walentinsson, A.; Johnsson, E.; Eriksson, J.W. A randomized controlled trial of Dapagliflozin Plus Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in individuals with obesity and without diabetes: Metabolic and marker ef-fects associated with body weight loss. Diabetes Ther. 2018, 9, 1511–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zhu, C.G.; Luo, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, J.Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.X.; Qu, H.Q.; Wang, B.L.; Zhu, M. Liraglutide Improves lipotoxicity-induced oxidative stress by activating the NRF2 pathway in HepG2 cells. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rizzo, M.; Nikolic, D.; Patti, A.M.; Mannina, C.; Montalto, G.; McAdams, B.S.; Rizvi, A.A.; Cosentino, F. GLP-1 receptor agonists and reduction of cardiometabolic risk: Potential underlying mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 2814–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nikolic, D.; Giglio, R.V.; Rizvi, A.A.; Patti, A.M.; Montalto, G.; Maranta, F.; Cianflone, D.; Stoian, A.P.; Rizzo, M. Liraglutide reduces carotid intima-media thickness by reducing small dense low-density lipoproteins in a real-world setting of patients with type 2 diabetes: A novel anti-atherogenic effect. Diabetes Ther. 2021, 12, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Anholm, C.; Kumarathurai, P.; Pedersen, L.R.; Samkani, A.; Walzem, R.L.; Nielsen, O.W.; Kristiansen, O.P.; Fenger, M.; Madsbad, S.; Sajadieh, A.; et al. Liraglutide in combination with metformin may improve the atherogenic lipid profile and decrease C-reactive protein level in statin treated obese patients with coronary artery disease and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. Atherosclerosis 2019, 288, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Berneis, K.; Rizzo, M.; Stettler, C.; Chappuis, B.; Braun, M.; Diem, P.; Christ, E.R. Comparative effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on fasting and postprandial low-density lipoprotein size and subclasses in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2008, 9, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rizzo, M.; Berneis, K. The clinical relevance of low-density-lipoproteins size modulation by statins. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2006, 20, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nikolic, D.; Banach, M.; Nikfar, S.; Salari, P.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Toth, P.P.; Abdollahi, M.; Ray, K.K.; Pencina, M.J.; Malyszko, J.; et al. Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration Group. A meta-analysis of the role of statins on renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Is the duration of therapy important? Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 5437–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Crismaru, I.; Pantea Stoian, A.; Bratu, O.G.; Gaman, M.A.; Stanescu, A.M.A.; Bacalbasa, N.; Diaconu, C.C. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering treatment: The current approach. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marso, S.P.; Daniels, G.H.; Brown-Frandsen, K.; Kristensen, P.; Mann, J.F.; Nauck, M.A.; Nissen, S.E.; Pocock, S.; Poulter, N.R.; Ravn, L.S.; et al. LEADER Steering Committee; LEADER Trial Investigators. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kutoh, E.; Kuto, A.N.; Wada, A.; Kurihara, R.; Kojima, R. Regulations of free fatty acids and diabetic parameters in drug naïve sub-jects with type 2 diabetes treated with canagliflozin monotherapy. Drug Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rizzo, M.; Berneis, K. Should we measure routinely the LDL peak particle size? Int. J. Cardiol. 2006, 107, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Berneis, K.; Rizzo, M.; Hersberger, M.; Rini, G.B.; Di Fede, G.; Pepe, I.; Spinas, G.A.; Carmina, E. Atherogenic forms of dyslipidaemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2009, 63, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rizvi, A.A.; Stoian, A.P.; Janez, A.; Rizzo, M. Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Disease: An, Update on the Clinical Significance of Atherogenic Small, Dense LDL and New Therapeutical Options. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bayram, F.; Kocer, D.; Gundogan, K.; Kaya, A.; Demir, O.; Coskun, R.; Sabuncu, T.; Ka-raman, A.; Cesur, M.; Rizzo, M.; et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia and associated risk factors in Turkish adults. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2014, 8, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Goedecke, J.H.; Utzschneider, K.; Faulenbach, M.V.; Rizzo, M.; Berneis, K.; Spinas, G.A.; Dave, J.; Levitt, N.S.; Lambert, E.V.; Olsson, T.; et al. Ethnic differences in serum lipoproteins and their determinants in South African women. Metabolism 2010, 59, 1341–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Toth, P.P.; Barylski, M.; Nikolic, D.; Rizzo, M.; Montalto, G.; Banach, M. Should low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) be treated? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 28, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rizzo, M.; Berneis, K. Who needs to care about small, dense low density lipoproteins? Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2007, 61, 1949–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rizvi, A.A. Cytokine biomarkers, endothelial inflammation, and atherosclerosis in the met-abolic syndrome: Emerging concepts. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2009, 338, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Suceveanu, A.I.; Mazilu, L.; Katsiki, N.; Parepa, I.; Voinea, F.; Pantea-Stoian, A.; Rizzo, M.; Botea, F.; Herlea, V.; Serban, D.; et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Biomarker-Could Be the New Tool for Improved Cardiometabolic Syndrome Outcome. Metabolites 2020, 10, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abate, N.; Sallam, H.S.; Rizzo, M.; Nikolic, D.; Obradovic, M.; Bjelogrlic, P.; Isenovic, E.R. Resistin: An inflammatory cytokine. Role in cardiovascular diseases, diabe-tes and the metabolic syndrome. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 4961–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ha, X.; Cai, X.; Cao, H.; Li, J.; Yang, B.; Jiang, R.; Li, X.; Li, B.; Xin, Y. Docking protein 1 and free fatty acids are associated with insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Int. Med. Res. 2021, 49, 3000605211048293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Menon, V.; Lincoff, A.M.; Nicholls, S.J.; Jasper, S.; Wolski, K.; McGuire, D.K.; Mehta, C.R.; Rosenstock, J.; Lopez, C.; Marcinak, J.; et al. Fasiglifam-Induced Liver Injury in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results of a Randomized Controlled Cardiovascular Outcomes Safety Trial. Diabetes Care 2018, 41, 2603–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Shavadia, J.S.; Sharma, A.; Gu, X.; Neaton, J.; DeLeve, L.; Holmes, D.; Home, P.; Eckel, R.H.; Watkins, P.B.; Granger, C.B. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin. Trials 2019, 16, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Potential actions of free fatty acids 1 receptor (FFA1R) and free fatty acids 4 receptor (FFA4R) agonists.
Figure 1. Potential actions of free fatty acids 1 receptor (FFA1R) and free fatty acids 4 receptor (FFA4R) agonists.
Medicina 58 00109 g001
Table 1. Effects of Free Fatty Acids on Glucose and Incretin Metabolism.
Table 1. Effects of Free Fatty Acids on Glucose and Incretin Metabolism.
FFA1 expressed by enteroendocrine cells regulates release of incretin hormones, such as GLP-1 and Cholecystokinin-5, which in turn enhance pancreatic insulin secretion and promote satiety
FFA1 agonists (Fasiglifam) have been shown to improve glycemic control, increase insulin sensitivity, induce body mass loss, and reduce inflammation
FFA2 and FFA3 receptors are linked to enhanced incretin secretion from enteroendocrine cells
There is still a paucity of research on inter-relationship between FFAs and incretins, research on FFA2/FFA3 agonists, and the role of FFARs in improving glucose uptake and increasing GLP-1 secretion
FFA4 agonism is associated with improved sensitivity to insulin via anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages through recruitment of β-arrestin 2, increased expression of M2 anti-inflammatory genes, and reduced expression of pro-inflammatory in M1 macrophages
FFA4 inhibits secretion of ghrelin, thus stimulating satiety, promoting incretin release leading to a glucoprotective effect in diabetes, and regulating glucagon secretion
FFAs couple with FFARs to regulate inflammation and peptide hormone secretion
FFA: Free Fatty Acids, FFARs: Free Fatty Acid Receptors, GLP-1: Glucagon-Like Peptide-1.
Table 2. Main findings from clinical trials with the use of FFAR agonists.
Table 2. Main findings from clinical trials with the use of FFAR agonists.
TrialRef.Year PublishedAgent StudiedStudy DesignResults
Leifke et al.[38]2012TAK-875Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, multiple ascending-doseSignificantly lower fasting and post-challenge glucose
Burant et al.[39]2012TAK-875Phase 2, randomized, double-blind with placebo and glimepiride comparator groupsHbA1c decreased by 1% with study agent
Ito et al.[42]2013TAK-875Combination with metformin in Zucker diabetic ratsPrevention of diabetes progression and beta-cell dysfunction
Tanaka et al.[41]2014AS2575959Combination with sitagliptinImproved glucose homeostasis
Nakashima et al.[43]2014DS-1558Combination with GLP-1 receptor agonistsImproved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion
Kaku et al.[40]2015TAK-875Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose Dose-related reduction in HbA1c compared with placebo
FFAR: Free Fatty Acid Receptor, GLP-1: Glucagon-Like Peptide-1, HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1c.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patti, A.M.; Giglio, R.V.; Papanas, N.; Serban, D.; Stoian, A.P.; Pafili, K.; Al Rasadi, K.; Rajagopalan, K.; Rizvi, A.A.; Ciaccio, M.; et al. Experimental and Emerging Free Fatty Acid Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Medicina 2022, 58, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010109

AMA Style

Patti AM, Giglio RV, Papanas N, Serban D, Stoian AP, Pafili K, Al Rasadi K, Rajagopalan K, Rizvi AA, Ciaccio M, et al. Experimental and Emerging Free Fatty Acid Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Medicina. 2022; 58(1):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patti, Angelo Maria, Rosaria Vincenza Giglio, Nikolaos Papanas, Dragos Serban, Anca Pantea Stoian, Kalliopi Pafili, Khalid Al Rasadi, Kanya Rajagopalan, Ali A. Rizvi, Marcello Ciaccio, and et al. 2022. "Experimental and Emerging Free Fatty Acid Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes" Medicina 58, no. 1: 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010109

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop