Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Periodontal Disease among Obese Young Adult Population in Saudi Arabia—A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Sclerotherapy of Vascular Malformations in the Oral Cavity—Minimizing Postoperative Morbidity
Previous Article in Journal
Missed Down Syndrome Cases after First Trimester False-Negative Screening—Lessons to be Learned
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Palatal Wound Healing with Primary Intention in a Rat Model—Histology and Immunohistomorphometry

by
Liat Chaushu
1,*,
Marina Rahmanov Gavrielov
1,
Gavriel Chaushu
2,3 and
Marilena Vered
4
1
Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
2
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
3
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Campus Beilinson, Petah Tiqwa 49100, Israel
4
Department of Oral Pathology, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Imaging, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2020, 56(4), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56040200
Submission received: 8 March 2020 / Revised: 17 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 24 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Surgery–Minimizing Postoperative Morbidity)

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) from the palate has been considered as the “gold standard” for the treatment of deep gingival recessions. A single-incision technique was reported to allow primary wound healing. A palatal single incision was performed in a rat model. The present study assessed the histology and histomorphometry of palatal wound healing following surgical closure with primary intention. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six 6-month-old male Wistar rats weighing 427–650 g. An incision was made on the maxillary palate. A full thickness flap was raised palatally, and then repositioned and sutured. Two experimental groups: S—Study group, I—Intact control group. Half of the animals were sacrificed 7 days and the remaining 14 days postoperatively. Outcome parameters included—epithelial gap; inflammatory infiltration; vascular fraction, expression of myofibroblasts and stem cell markers within the oral epithelium and stromal cells and physical properties of stromal collagen fibers. Investigations were performed at two time-points (7 and 14 days) during the wound healing process. Results: The epithelial gap closed completely after 14 days. The inflammatory reaction and vascular fraction were relatively low. Surgical trauma downregulated the expression of cytokeratin (CK) 14 and CK 15, which returned to normal after 14 days. Epithelial differentiation was mediated through upregulation of connective tissue sex- determining-region-Y-box2 (SOX2). Epithelial SOX2, CD34, alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and physical properties of stromal collagen fibers were not influenced by the surgical trauma. Conclusions: Surgical trauma followed by palatal wound healing with primary intention in a rat model heals within 14 days. It induces minimal inflammatory infiltration and vascular proliferation. Epithelization is exerted through promotion of epithelial differentiation from stem cells by connective tissue SOX2.

1. Introduction

Recent studies advocate the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) as the “gold standard” for soft tissue augmentation, especially, deep gingival recessions [1,2,3,4,5]. Harvesting SCTG from the palate is accompanied by substantial inconvenience. Various clinicians described a diversity of surgical techniques intended to lower this morbidity.
Hürzeler and Weng [6] presented a single-incision technique, followed by primary intention closure. Primary wound healing was thought to minimize donor site discomfort. Different harvest surgical techniques were compared. Primary wound closure following a single-incision technique was regarded as less invasive and less painful [7,8,9,10].
The remaining part of the connective tissue at the donor site following harvest was mentioned as another factor that may encourage post-operative wound healing [11,12].
The mucosa protects the oral cavity by being a barrier against intruders. When its integrity is compromised, either by acute or chronic challenges as surgical procedures, the body initiates a multistep complex healing process at the injured site [13,14,15,16,17]. Cells, both epithelial and mesenchymal, play an important role in the healing cascade [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Recently, the field of regenerative medicine introduced several blood-derived components ((i) platelet-rich plasma (PRP), (ii) platelet-poor plasma (PPP), (iii) platelet gel (PG), (iv) platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), (v) serum eye drops (E-S) and (vi) PRP eye drops (E-PRP) [24]) to promote wound healing. Their common action is PG enriched with local growth factors (vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and other) potentiating stem cells [24]. This became popular for the treatment of skin ulcers, radiodermatitis and other conditions [25,26,27]. Recently, a case of life-threatening oral mucositis (OM) following high-dose conditioning chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), which was successfully treated with cord blood platelet gel (CBPG) was described [28]. Furthermore, a statistically significant improvement of OM following PG treatment was shown in patients treated with chemo- and radio-therapy [24].
To the best of our knowledge, there is lack of information in the literature assessing microscopical events following palatal wound healing surgical closure by primary intention. The aim of the present study was to assess the histology and histomorphometry of primary soft tissue healing, following palatal surgical incision, in a rat model, via expression of mesenchymal and epithelial cell markers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Preparation of Experimental Model

Twenty-six 6-month-old male Wistar rats weighting 427–650 g were involved in this study. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines on Animal Experiments in Tel Aviv University after approval by the Tel Aviv University Animal Care Committee.
General anesthesia was achieved by an intraperitoneal injection of 0.1% Xylazine (10 mg/kg) and 0.1% Ketamine (80 mg/kg). In addition, Isoflurane (TerrellTM) was administered by a vaporizer at 2%–3% 100–200 mL/min combined with oxygen supply. Local anesthesia was performed using 0.4 mL Lidocaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:100,000. A palatal incision was made on the maxillary alveolar ridge in the existing edentulous area between the 1st molar and the incisors using a 15c blade (Figure 1).
A full thickness flap was raised bilaterally and was then repositioned and sutured with resorbable Vicryl RapidTM 5-0 sutures (Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson, NJ, USA) (Figure 2).

2.2. Experimental Groups

Animals were randomly attributed to 2 experimental groups with two postoperative time frames of 7 and 14 days:
S—Study group—Single incision, periosteal exposure, closure by primary intention.
I—Intact control group—No surgery performed.
Half of the animals were sacrificed 7 days and the remaining 14 days postoperatively. Day 7 post-incision corresponds to the end of the inflammatory-to-peak proliferation phases of the wound healing process and day 14 corresponds to the end of the proliferation and beginning of remodeling phase [13,14,15,16,17,29].

2.3. Tissue Harvesting

Animals were sacrificed following standard ethical guidelines using CO2 inhalation. The maxillae were excised and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 7 days at room temperature. After decalcification in a 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution for 30 days, (EDTA solution was replaced every 3 days), the specimens were embedded in paraffin and cut into serial sections of 4 µm thickness in a coronal plane, perpendicular to the line of incision.

2.4. Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation

Segments of the treated area were processed for histological and immunohistochemical evaluation using the following staining methods:

2.4.1. Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) Staining

Following an overnight incubation at 60 °C, slides were washed in xylene (twice × 5 min) then transferred to decreasing ethanol concentrations (100%, 96%, 70%), washed in double distilled water (DDW) (twice) and stained by Harris Hematoxylin (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). After washing in tap water, slides were shortly dipped in 1% acid alcohol and consequently washed in water. Finally, a 1-min staining in 1% Eosin (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was performed, followed by washes in DDW, ethanol (70%, 96%, 100%) and cover slipping.

Epithelial Gap Measurement

Epithelial gap was measured under a ×40 magnification using an Olympus BH-2 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The gap zone was defined by lack of wound tissue and its width was measured between two parallel lines that were drawn tangentially to the tissue that bordered the gap at its both sides (Figure 3).
A mean of all measurements in 2 serial sections were calculated. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each of the two time frames (7 and 14 days) of the study groups.

Histomorphometry (Inflammatory Infiltration, Vascular Density)

Histomorphometry (light microscope, Olympus BH-2, Tokyo, Japan) was performed on a transversal plane of the maxilla. The histomorphometric method was an adaptation of the point-counting procedure [30]. In practice, selected fields were photomicrographed (JPEG format) at ×100 using a camera (Olympus DP70, Tokyo, Japan) with the wound area being positioned in the center of the field and the surface epithelium being positioned at and in parallel to the upper photographed field. Then, the JPEG photomicrograph was transported to a full PPT slide dimension. A 10 × 10 square-grid overlapped on top of each PPT slide. Point counting was performed on inflammatory infiltration and vascular density. Whenever the graticule-square center (marked by a "+") hit the parameter, it scored one point (Figure 4). The sum of points of the parameter in each case (Pi) was calculated and expressed as the area fraction percentage (AFP) as part of the total number of "+" summed in all sections that represent the whole section area (Σi) [31,32]. The results were represented as mean AFP for inflammatory infiltration and vascular density in each group.

2.4.2. Immunnohistochemical Staining

Following an overnight incubation at 60 °C, slides were washed in xylene (twice × 5 min) and then, in declining concentrations of ethanol (100%, 96%, 70%), rinsed twice in DDW and placed for 10 min in 3% H2O2 for inactivation of endogenous peroxidases. Antigen retrieval was performed for each antibody as recommended by the manufacturer (Table 1). Pap pen-marked slides were washed in DDW and wash buffer (Zytomed systems DAB530, Berlin, Germany) in order to set pH at 7.0–7.4. Next, sections were treated for 40 min with background buster (Innovex biosciences NB306-50, Richmond, USA) in a humid chamber for minimizing nonspecific staining. Next, slides were incubated with a series of primary antibodies (Table 1).
Secondary antibodies followed for 30 min. Colorimetric reactions were performed using diluted diamino benzydine (DAB) chromagen (Zytomed systems DAB530, Berlin, Germany). Finally, slides were shortly dipped in Mayer’s Hematoxylin (Scy Tek labratories, Logan, U.S.A), washed in increasing ethanol concentrations (96%, 100%) and absolute xylene, and coverslipped. Positive tissue controls are detailed in Table 1; negative controls were achieved by omitting the primary antibody.

2.4.3. Immunohistomorphometry

CK14 and CK15

The epithelial width was divided into the basal and upper halves at ×20 magnification. The immunoreaction was semi-quantitatively assessed and scored as staining intensity: 0—no staining, 1—weak staining, 2—intermediate staining, 3—strong staining. The mean staining intensity for the two halves per animal was calculated and the results were presented as the mean staining score per study group.

SOX2 (Nuclear Staining)

From each animal, two fields comprising of oral lining epithelium at the incision site were microphotographed at ×200 and similarly, the corresponding connective tissue fields beneath each of the epithelial fields. All microphotographs were saved as JPEG files and then copied to a full power point template (PPT) slide. A 100-square grid overlapped on the PPT slide. The number of positively-stained nuclei were counted in each field. Each case was given a mean score for the epithelial and stromal compartments, and each group was represented by a general mean of staining score (epithelium and stroma separately).

CD34

Immunohistomorphometry was performed by the aid of AFP, with a modification in the method used for the inflammatory infiltrate. Specifically, the assessment was performed at ×100 magnification with a 25-square grid that was placed over the incision area beneath the epithelial lining. If the "+" of the squares overlapped positively stained blood vessel walls or their lumina or any CD-34-positively stained cell/s within the connective tissue, a score of 1 was allocated to the case. The results were represented as mean AFP for CD34+ blood vessels/cells in each study group.

αSMA

Immunohistomorphometry was performed at ×100 magnification with a 25-square grid, in a modified manner compared to that of CD34. Since αSMA is expected to be positive in the smooth muscle cells in blood vessel walls as well as in wound healing-related myofibroblasts, each of the 25 squares was given an individual score for the overall expression of this marker: 0—no expression, 1—a few scattered positive cells/blood vessels, 2—abundant cells/blood vessels but not throughout the entire square, and 3—abundant cells/blood vessels all over the examined square. The mean of scores for all 25 squares was calculated per each animal. The results were presented as the general mean score for each study group.

Histochemical Analysis of Collagen Fibers

The physical properties of the collagen fibers were analyzed using picrosirius red (PSR) stain and polarized microscopy [33]. Tissue sections, 8-μm thick, were prepared and stained for 30 min with Sirius red (0.1% of Sirius red in saturated aqueous picric acid), for collagen bundle staining. Sections were studied by a light microscope under polarized light (Olympus BH-2, Tokyo, Japan), on which a digital camera was mounted (Olympus DP-70, Tokyo, Japan). Photomicrographs were saved as JPEG files that were subsequently copied onto power-point (PPT) slides, each slide showing side-by-side the original and the 90°-rotated counterpart picture. A grid composed of 10 doted parallel lines, with an equal distance between any 2 following lines, was superimposed on each picture. Those collagen bundles that overlapped the grid lines on the original picture were identified and their color was recorded and then compared to the counterpart, 90°-rotated picture. Changes in polarization colors of the collagen bundles between the original to the rotated picture were recorded: green-to-yellow, green-to-orange/red, and yellow-to-orange/red and vice versa. In addition, events of disappearance or appearance of polarization colors that were generated by the 90° rotation were also recorded. The percent of those collagen bundles with changed colors from the total number of bundles was calculated for each case. The results were presented as the mean percent number of collagen fibers with change of color for each study group.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were entered and analyzed in SPSS version 24. First, descriptive statistics were produced, while means and standard deviations were calculated for all continuous measures. Outcome indices between groups (S, I), along time (7 and 14 days) were tested using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences between groups were further examined using post-hoc analyses (Bonferroni tests). A p-value lower than 5% was considered to be a significant result.

3. Results

Twenty-six animals survived the end of the study and were included in the statistical analysis (Table 2), S (n = 16), I (n = 10).

3.1. Epithelial Gap

Epithelial gap (Table 3) decreased significantly between 7 and 14 days (p < 0.01) in the S group.

3.2. Inflammatory Infiltrate

A significant difference was found between experimental groups (p = 0.004). The inflammatory infiltrate was significantly increased in the S vs. the I group on days 7 and 14 (Table 4). Inflammatory infiltrate decreased from day 7 to 14 in the S group, however, differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

3.3. Vascular Density

No significant difference between experimental groups (Table 4). No significant interaction was found between groups and time.

3.4. CK14 Expression

A significant difference between experimental groups (p < 0.001) was found (Table 5, Figure 5). Expression of CK14 was significantly lower only after 7 days in the S group (p < 0.01).

3.5. CK15 Expression

A significant difference between groups (p < 0.001) was found (Table 5, Figure 5). Expression of CK15 was significantly lower after 7 days in the S group and remained low even after 14 days.

3.6. Epithelium and Connective Tissue SOX2 Expression

3.6.1. Epithelial SOX2

No significant difference was found between groups (Table 6, Figure 5). Means in the S group were close to those in the I group. No significant interaction was found between group and time.

3.6.2. Connective Tissue SOX2

A significant difference was found between groups (p < 0.001) with a higher expression in the S group (Table 6, Figure 5). Similar levels were found in each group at 7 and 14 days.

3.6.3. CD34 Expression

No significant difference between groups (Table 7, Figure 5), αSMA (Figure 5), PSR (Figure 6). No significant changes along time.

4. Discussion

The present study evaluated the effects of single incision trauma on primary wound healing. Histologically, it was demonstrated that the epithelial gap almost closed completely only after 14 days. The mechanism through which this effect is exerted was further evaluated. It can be speculated that due to primary wound closure, the inflammatory reaction was relatively low and no statistically significant changes occurred along time. It can be inferred that the inflammatory reaction was initiated by the incision, but due to primary closure it remained low. Similarly, no changes were noted in vascular density indicating a lack of granulation tissue.
CK14 is recognized as a specific epithelial marker, particularly of the basal cells [34,35,36]. The increased values in the S group at day 14 support the early appearance of K14 in the differentiation process. CK14, in addition to it being associated with basal cell proliferation, is also known for its role as a maintainer of basal cell shape, provider of resistance to mechanical stress and messenger of signals coming from the adjacent connective tissue cells [37].
CK15 is another specific marker of the basal epithelium [38,39]. The low values in the S group at day 14 support the late appearance of K15 in the differentiation process. Some studies showed that like CK14, CK15 can also form a filament network of the cytoskeleton, and as such, acts in a similar way to that of CK14 [40].
SOX2 is a member of the SOX family of transcription factors [41]. SOX2 may have important roles in the formation of early pluripotent embryonic cells [42]. Surgical trauma did not affect the expression of epithelial SOX2. Connective tissue SOX2 was upregulated following surgical trauma.
CD34 is expressed in hematopoietic progenitor cells of myeloid and lymphoid lineage and stromal cells in several organs [43]. αSMA is a marker of myofibroblasts. PSR demonstrates collagen maturation. None of these factors was significantly influenced by the surgical incision.
Primary wound closure following single-incision technique has been regarded as less invasive and less painful [7,8,9,10,11]. Based on the results of the present study, it can be speculated that the minimal inflammatory infiltrate noted histologically and the fast wound closure could be responsible for reduced pain and morbidity in patients.
The remaining part of the connective tissue at the donor site following harvest was mentioned as another factor that may influence post-operative wound healing [11,12]. The upregulation of connective tissue SOX2 may explain the importance of the connective tissue in wound healing. The thicker the connective tissue remaining, the better wound healing will be established.
Future studies should also focus to identify what kind of clinically available growth factors (e.g., platelet gel [24,25,26,27,28]) may be used to improve the healing processes.

5. Conclusions

Surgical trauma followed by palatal wound healing with primary intention in a rat model heals within 14 days. It induces minimal inflammatory infiltrate and vascular proliferation. Epithelization may be exerted through promotion of epithelial differentiation from stem cells by connective tissue SOX2.

Author Contributions

L.C.—data collection and analysis, research design, drafting the paper, approval submission; M.R.G.—data collection, drafting the paper, approval submission; G.C.—data analysis, research design, revising the paper, approval submission; M.V.—data analysis, research design, revising the paper, approval submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study received no funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Roccuzzo, M.; Bunino, M.; Needleman, I.; Sanz, M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: A systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2002, 29, 178–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Santamaria, M.P.; da Silva Feitosa, D.; Casati, M.Z.; Nociti, F.H., Jr.; Sallum, A.W.; Sallum, E.A. Randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating connective tissue graft plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: 2-year follow-up. J. Periodontol. 2013, 84, e1–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cairo, F.; Nieri, M.; Pagliaro, U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014, 41, 44–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chambrone, L.; Tatakis, D.N. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J. Periodontol. 2015, 86, 8–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Madeley, E.; Duane, B. Coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft; treatment of choice for root coverage following recession? Evid. Based Dent. 2017, 18, 6–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hürzeler, M.B.; Weng, D. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. Int. J. Periodontics. Restorative. Dent. 1999, 19, 279–287. [Google Scholar]
  7. Del Pizzo, M.; Modica, F.; Bethaz, N.; Priotto, P.; Romagnoli, R. The connective tissue graft: A comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site. A preliminary study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2002, 29, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wessel, J.R.; Tatakis, D.N. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J. Periodontol. 2008, 79, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zucchelli, G.; Mele, M.; Stefanini, M.; Mazzotti, C.; Marzadori, M.; Montebugnoli, L.; de Sanctis, M. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: A comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010, 37, 728–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fickl, S.; Fischer, K.R.; Jockel-Schneider, Y.; Stappert, C.F.; Schlagenhauf, U.; Kebschull, M. Early wound healing and patient morbidity after single-incision vs. trap-door graft harvesting from the palate--a clinical study. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2014, 18, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Burkhardt, R.; Hämmerle, C.H.; Lang, N.P. Research group on oral soft tissue biology & wound healing. Self-reported pain perception of patients after mucosal graft harvesting in the palatal area. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2015, 42, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Maino, G.N.E.; Valles, C.; Santos, A.; Pascual, A.; Esquinas, C.; Nart, J. Influence of suturing technique on wound healing and patient morbidity after connective tissue harvesting. A randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Leoni, G.; Neumann, P.A.; Sumagin, R.; Denning, T.L.; Nusrat, A. Wound repair: Role of immune–epithelial interactions. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 8, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Eminga, S.A.; Brachvogelb, B.; Odorisiod, T.; Kocha, M. Regulation of angiogenesis: Wound healing as a model. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 2007, 42, 115–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Velnar, T.; Bailey, T.; Smrkolj, V. The wound healing process: An overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Int. Med. Res. 2009, 37, 1528–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harper, D.; Young, A.; McNaught, C.E. The physiology of wound healing. Surgery 2014, 32, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kirsner, R.S.; Eaglstein, W.H. The wound healing process. Dermatol. Clin. 1993, 11, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weissman, I.L. Stem cells: Units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Cell 2000, 100, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chen, M.; Przyborowski, M.; Berthiaume, F. Stem cells for skin tissue engineering and wound healing. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cottler-Fox, M.H.; Lapidot, T.; Petit, I.; Kollet, O.; DiPersio, J.F.; Link, D.; Link, D.; Devine, S. Stem cell mobilization. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2003, 2003, 419–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fu, S.; Liesveld, J. Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood Rev. 2000, 14, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Badiavas, E.V.; Abedi, M.; Butmarc, J.; Falanga, V.; Quesenberry, P. Participation of bone marrow derived cells in cutaneous wound healing. J. Cell Physiol. 2003, 196, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fathke, C.; Wilson, L.; Hutter, J.; Kapoor, V.; Smith, A.; Hocking, A.; Isik, F. Contribution of bone marrow derived cells to skin: Collagen deposition and wound repair. Stem. Cells 2004, 22, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Piccin, A.; Bacigalupo, A.; Zini, G.; Hamidieh, A.A.; Bianchi, M.; Sica, S.; Valentini, C.G.; Wolf, D.; Dazzi, F.; Fontanella, F.; et al. Is platelet gel safe enough for neutropenic patients? Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2019, 58, 190–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Piccin, A.; Di Pierro, A.M.; Corvetta, D.; Canzian, L.; Gentilini, I.; Primerano, M.; Tupini, C.; Mercuri, E.; Negri, G.; Mazzoleni, G.; et al. Severe skin radiodermatitis fully healed with the use of platelet gel and a hyperbaric chamber. Blood Transfus. 2015, 14, 552–554. [Google Scholar]
  26. Piccin, A.; Di Pierro, A.M.; Tagnin, M.; Russo, C.; Fustos, R.; Corvetta, D.; Primerano, M.; Magri, E.; Conci, V.; Gentilini, I.; et al. Healing of a soft tissue wound of the neck and jaw osteoradionecrosis using platelet gel. Regen. Med. 2016, 11, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Piccin, A.; Di Pierro, A.M.; Canzian, L.; Primerano, M.; Corvetta, D.; Negri, G.; Mazzoleni, G.; Gastl, G.; Steurer, M.; Gentilini, I.; et al. Platelet gel: A new therapeutic tool with great potential. Blood Transfus. 2017, 15, 333–340. [Google Scholar]
  28. Piccin, A.; Rebulla, P.; Pupella, S.; Tagnin, M.; Marano, G.; Di Pierro, A.M.; Santodirocco, M.; Di Mauro, L.; Beqiri, L.; Kob, M.; et al. Impressive tissue regeneration of severe oral mucositis post stem cell transplantation using cord blood platelet gel. Transfusion 2017, 57, 2220–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chaushu, L.; Weinreb, M.; Beitlitum, I.; Moses, O.; Nemcovsky, C.E. Evaluation of a topical herbal patch for soft tissue wound healing: An animal study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2015, 42, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chalkley, H. Method for the quantitative morphologic analysis of tissues. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1943, 4, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  31. Artzi, Z.; Tal, H.; Dayan, D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. J. Peridontol. 2000, 71, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bellhouse, D.R. Area estimation by point-counting techniques. Biometrics 1981, 37, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lattouf, R.; Younes, R.; Lutomski, D.; Naaman, N.; Godeau, G.; Senni, K.; Changotade, S. Picrosirius red staining: A useful tool to appraise collagen networks in normal and pathological tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2014, 62, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Brunotto, M.; Zárate, A.M.; Cismondi, A.; Fernández, M.; Del, C.; Noher de Halac, R.I. Valuation of exfoliative cytology as prediction factor in oral mucosa lesions. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2005, 1, 92–102. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jacques, C.M.; Pereira, A.L.; Maia, V.; Cuzzi, T.; Ramos-e-Silva, M. Expression of cytokeratins 10, 13, 14 and 19 in oral lichen planus. J. Oral Sci. 2009, 51, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gao, X.-L.; Wu, J.-S.; Cao, M.-X.; Gao, S.-Y.; Cen, X.; Jiang, Y.-P.; Wang, S.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liang, X.; et al. Cytokeratin-14 contributes to collective invasion of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2017, 2, e0171341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rousselle, P.; Braye, F.; Dayan, G. Re-epithelialization of adult skin wounds: Cellular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 344–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bose, A.; The, M.-T.; Mackenzie, I.C.; Waseem, A. Keratin K15 as a biomarker of epidermal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19385–19398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lyle, S.; Christofidou-Solomidou, M.; Liu, Y.; Elder, D.E.; Albelda, S.; Cotsarelis, G. The C8/144B monoclonal antibody recognizes cytokeratin 15 and defines the location of human hair follicle stem cells. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111, 3179–3188. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rugg, E.L.; McLean, W.H.; Lane, E.B.; Pitera, R.; McMillan, J.R.; Dopping-Hepenstal, P.J.; Eady, R.A. A functional “knockout” of human keratin 14. Genes Develop. 1984, 8, 2563–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wegner, M. All-purpose Sox: The many roles of SOX proteins. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010, 42, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Avilion, A.A.; Nicolis, S.K.; Pevny, L.H.; Perez, L.; Vivian, N. Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Díaz-Flores, L.; Gutiérrez, R.; García, M.P.; Sáez, F.J.; Díaz-Flores, L., Jr.; Valladares, F. CD34+ stromal cells/fibroblasts/fibrocytes/telocytes as a tissue reserve and a principal source of mesenchymal cells. Location, morphology, function and role in pathology. Histol. Histopathol. 2014, 29, 831–870. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Palatal incision.
Figure 1. Palatal incision.
Medicina 56 00200 g001
Figure 2. Primary closure with resorbable sutures.
Figure 2. Primary closure with resorbable sutures.
Medicina 56 00200 g002
Figure 3. H&E staining for measurement of epithelial gap distance (×40).
Figure 3. H&E staining for measurement of epithelial gap distance (×40).
Medicina 56 00200 g003
Figure 4. An example of the point-counting method. The "+" overlying the oral lining epithelium at the top of the photomicrograph should be excluded from counting. The yellow "+" overlies a blood vessel, therefore this parameter will be attributed 1 point. The green "+" is only adjacent to a blood vessel, therefore this parameter will score 0 points for the blood vessels. The orange "+" overlies an inflammatory cell (gain of 1 point), the blue "+" is only adjacent to inflammatory cells (0 points) (H&E, original magnification ×100).
Figure 4. An example of the point-counting method. The "+" overlying the oral lining epithelium at the top of the photomicrograph should be excluded from counting. The yellow "+" overlies a blood vessel, therefore this parameter will be attributed 1 point. The green "+" is only adjacent to a blood vessel, therefore this parameter will score 0 points for the blood vessels. The orange "+" overlies an inflammatory cell (gain of 1 point), the blue "+" is only adjacent to inflammatory cells (0 points) (H&E, original magnification ×100).
Medicina 56 00200 g004
Figure 5. A panel of representative fields for the various examined markers in the Study and Intact groups, at 7- and 14-days postoperative time points.
Figure 5. A panel of representative fields for the various examined markers in the Study and Intact groups, at 7- and 14-days postoperative time points.
Medicina 56 00200 g005
Figure 6. Histopathological sections of picrosirius red-stained collagen fibers seen with polarized light. A and B represent the same field seen at the original position (A) and then rotated 90° (B). The polarization colors do not change after rotation. C and D represent the same field seen at the original position (C) and then rotated 90° (D). Arrows point to collagen fibers that changed polarization colors after rotation. (A–D, original magnification ×400).
Figure 6. Histopathological sections of picrosirius red-stained collagen fibers seen with polarized light. A and B represent the same field seen at the original position (A) and then rotated 90° (B). The polarization colors do not change after rotation. C and D represent the same field seen at the original position (C) and then rotated 90° (D). Arrows point to collagen fibers that changed polarization colors after rotation. (A–D, original magnification ×400).
Medicina 56 00200 g006
Table 1. Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry in the study* **.
Table 1. Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry in the study* **.
TargetMarkerPrimary Antibody Manufacturer
Dilution
Time of Exposure
Clone
Catalog #
Positive Control Tissue
ActinαSMA ***Dako A/S, Denmark
1:100
1 h
Clone 1A4
Catalog #M0851
Blood vessels
Embryonic stem cellSOX2Novus Biologicals, Littleton, U.S.A
1:150
1 h
Polycolonal
Catalog #NB110-79875
Normal human brain
Hematopoietic stem cellsCD34Abcam, Cambridge, U.S.A
1:1000
1 h
Clone EP373Y
Catalog #ab81289
Human kidney
Epithelial cellsCytokeratin (CK) 14Proteintech, U.S.A
1:200
1 h
Polycolonal
Catalog # 10143-1-AP
Human lung cancer (Squamous)
Cytokeratin (CK) 15Proteintech, U.S.A
1:200
1 h
Polycolonal
Catalog #10137-1-AP
Human oesophageal cancer
* Antigen retrieval procedure for all the antibodies—EDTA pH 9%. ** Secondary antibody for all the antibodies—Zytomed HRP one step Polymer, Zytomed systems, Berlin, Germany. *** αSMA – alpha smooth muscle actin
Table 2. Summary of cases in the study.
Table 2. Summary of cases in the study.
SITotal
Days78513
148513
Total161026
Table 3. Epithelial gap (mm).
Table 3. Epithelial gap (mm).
GroupDayMeanSD
S70.760.92
140.040.11
Total0.380.71
Table 4. Inflammatory infiltrate & vascular density (%).
Table 4. Inflammatory infiltrate & vascular density (%).
Inflammatory InfiltrateVascular Density
GroupDayMeanSDMeanSD
S7272395
14712124
Total1821105
I72465
1423105
Total2485
Table 5. CK14 and CK15 intensity score.
Table 5. CK14 and CK15 intensity score.
CK14 CK15
GroupDayMeanSDMeanSD
S71.30.41.30.3
142.00.71.70.7
Total1.70.61.50.5
I72.10.51.80.7
142.70.32.20.3
Total2.40.52.00.5
Table 6. Epithelium and Connective Tissue SOX2 mean positive nuclei score.
Table 6. Epithelium and Connective Tissue SOX2 mean positive nuclei score.
Epithelium Connective Tissue
GroupDayMeanSDMeanSD
S7147535628
14147584825
Total147545226
I716044209
1413613146
Total14833178
Table 7. CD34 (%).
Table 7. CD34 (%).
CD34
GroupDayMeanSD
S717.59
1420.510
Total19.010
I733.614
1425.613
Total29.613

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaushu, L.; Rahmanov Gavrielov, M.; Chaushu, G.; Vered, M. Palatal Wound Healing with Primary Intention in a Rat Model—Histology and Immunohistomorphometry. Medicina 2020, 56, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56040200

AMA Style

Chaushu L, Rahmanov Gavrielov M, Chaushu G, Vered M. Palatal Wound Healing with Primary Intention in a Rat Model—Histology and Immunohistomorphometry. Medicina. 2020; 56(4):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56040200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaushu, Liat, Marina Rahmanov Gavrielov, Gavriel Chaushu, and Marilena Vered. 2020. "Palatal Wound Healing with Primary Intention in a Rat Model—Histology and Immunohistomorphometry" Medicina 56, no. 4: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56040200

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop