Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Relationship Between Protein-Level Ratios (rQLTs) and Duodenal Ulcer
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Bioinformatic Characterization of CD70, CD80, and TIGIT as Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Immune Biomarkers in Pan-Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metformin as an Innate Immune Modulator: Metabolic and Epigenetic Reprogramming of Innate Immune Cells and Therapeutic Implications

Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(6), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060642 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 6 May 2026 / Revised: 16 June 2026 / Accepted: 18 June 2026 / Published: 22 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)

Abstract

Metformin, widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), has emerged as a systemic immunomodulator with effects that extend far beyond glycemic control. Recent advances in immunometabolism reveal that metformin modulates innate immune responses through coordinated cellular metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic modification, which collectively modulate the functional phenotype of innate immune cells. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the immunomodulatory effects of metformin on the innate immune system, with a focus on immunometabolism and epigenetic regulation. It explores how metformin modulates innate immunity by altering cellular energy sensing, mitochondrial function, and nutrient utilization. Such metabolic changes and alterations further reshape chromatin structure and architecture, as well as transcriptional profiles and programs. Through the regulation of glycolysis, fatty acid oxidation, and histone modification landscapes, metformin regulates the phenotypes of innate immune cells, which can be pro-inflammatory, tolerogenic, or homeostatic. This conceptual framework presents a new understanding of metformin. As well as acting as an anti-inflammatory agent, it may regulate immune memory.

1. Introduction

The immune system is now recognized as a metabolically driven network in which cellular function is tightly coupled to bioenergetic status. Over the past decade, research in immunometabolism has yielded important findings about metabolic pathways in immune cells. Such pathways are not just passive mechanisms supporting immune cell survival but actively influence cell differentiation and effector functions. Glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and lipid metabolism are also key factors influencing whether immune cells adopt an inflammatory, regulatory, or memory-like phenotype. Within this framework, the concept of trained immunity has revolutionized traditional views of immunological memory [1]. Innate immune cells, once considered incapable of forming immunological memory, can undergo long-term functional reprogramming following transient external stimulation [2]. This process is mediated by sustained metabolic rewiring and epigenetic remodeling, enabling these cells to mount altered responses upon secondary challenge with homologous or heterologous stimuli [1]. While trained immunity enhances host defense in certain contexts, maladaptive training immunity driven by metabolic stress contributes to chronic inflammation, cardiometabolic disease, and cancer [3,4,5].
Metformin, a first-line therapy for T2D, occupies a unique position at the intersection of metabolism and immunity. Classically recognized for improving insulin sensitivity via the inhibition of mitochondrial complex I and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), metformin is now appreciated to exert broad immunomodulatory effects. Metformin exerts complex immunomodulatory effects beyond simple anti-inflammatory activity. Its ultimate outcomes vary depending on the disease type, basal metabolic status of the organism, local tissue microenvironment, targeted immune cell subsets, and drug concentrations. Under different circumstances, metformin can suppress excessive inflammation, induce immune tolerance, and activate anti-tumor and anti-infectious immunity; meanwhile, it may also lead to immunosuppression. It modulates macrophage polarization, dendritic cell (DC) activation, neutrophil function, and lymphocyte differentiation, primarily through metabolic mechanisms. Notably, many of these pathways overlap with those that govern the induction and maintenance of trained immunity.
The innate immune system mounts a rapid, non-specific response against external pathogens and internal damage signals. Its components encompass physical and chemical barriers, including skin, mucous membranes, and antimicrobial peptides, as well as immune cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, DC, and natural killer (NK) cells. These cells recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and damage-associated molecular patterns via pattern recognition receptors, thereby initiating inflammatory responses to combat infection and promote tissue repair. Beyond pathogen defense, innate immunity primes adaptive immune responses through the activation of antigen-presenting cells such as DC, thereby establishing a functional bridge between innate and adaptive immunity [6,7].
Emerging evidence demonstrates that metformin influences innate immunity by reprogramming cellular metabolism and immune cell function. Its primary mechanisms involve AMPK activation and modulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Metformin promotes anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization while suppressing pro-inflammatory M1 responses. It enhances NK cells’ cytotoxicity through improved metabolic flexibility and regulates DC maturation and antigen presentation, thereby modulating T-cell priming.
The gut microbiota acts as a crucial metabolic mediator linking host physiological functions and immune regulation [8]. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that metformin remodels the composition and function of gut microbiota: It increases the abundance of Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, and short-chain-fatty-acid-producing microbes while reducing the proportion of pro-inflammatory bacteria [9]. Microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids, and tryptophan metabolites regulate the metabolic patterns, epigenetic status, and inflammatory levels of innate immune cells via activating GPR41/43, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) [10].
Innate immune dysfunction is implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune disorders (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease), and cancer. Metformin’s immunomodulatory properties render it a promising therapeutic candidate for these conditions [11,12,13]. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying its effects on innate immune cells remain incompletely understood. This article reviews research into the interaction between metformin and the innate immune system, including its effects on innate immune cells and its role in regulating immune metabolic pathways and the epigenetic landscape.

2. Method

Literature retrieval was performed using PubMed and Web of Science. These two databases comprehensively cover basic experimental and clinical studies, ensuring the completeness and representativeness of literature sources. The search formula was formulated as follows: (Metformin [MeSH] OR metformin OR dimethylbiguanidine OR glucophage) AND (immunity OR immune OR innate immunity OR adaptive immunity OR immune response OR inflammation OR inflammatory OR pro-inflammatory OR anti-inflammatory OR cytokine OR chemokine OR interleukin OR TNF OR interferon OR TLR OR NLRP3 OR macrophage OR monocyte OR neutrophil OR eosinophil OR mast cell OR dendritic cell OR DC OR NK cell OR natural killer cell OR ILC OR innate lymphoid cell OR glycolysis OR fatty acid oxidation OR FAO OR epigenetics OR epigenetic). The retrieval deadline was 10 April 2026. Preclinical studies included in vitro cell experiments, in vivo animal experiments, and research on molecular mechanisms. Clinical evidence consisted of human-based studies such as clinical trials, cohort studies, and case–control studies. Literature screening was conducted in two steps: Irrelevant and duplicate articles were initially excluded by titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review to verify content relevance. In addition, studies with obvious methodological flaws and low credibility were eliminated based on experimental design, data integrity, and standardization of research implementation to finalize the literature inclusion.

3. Pharmacokinetic Profiles, Intracellular Accumulation, and Tissue Distribution of Metformin

The pharmacokinetic properties, intracellular accumulation, and tissue distribution patterns of metformin serve as critical links between its effective in vivo exposure and immunomodulatory functions. As a drug primarily taken up via organic cation transporters of the solute carrier (SLC) family (e.g., OCT1), its tissue distribution is closely correlated with the expression levels of these transporters [14]. Following oral administration, metformin accumulates markedly in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidneys. The peak plasma concentration reaches approximately 20–30 μM at a dose of 1 g, and the intestine has been identified as one of its major sites of action [15,16]. Notably, clozapine inhibits OCT1-mediated hepatic uptake in a dose-dependent manner, which reduces intrahepatic drug distribution and attenuates the hypoglycemic effect of metformin. This indicates that the transporter function exerts a decisive impact on tissue drug exposure [14].
Cellular uptake is a prerequisite for metformin to exert biological effects. Transporters such as OCT1 mediate the entry of metformin into hepatocytes, fetal hepatocytes, and HEK293-OCT1 cells. Silencing OCT1 substantially impairs the cellular uptake of metformin and the subsequent glucose consumption effect [14,17]. Once inside cells, metformin activates the AMPK pathway by regulating cellular energy status, while some of its immunological effects are mediated through AMPK-independent mechanisms, thereby modulating the functions of various immune cells [18,19]. For instance, in natural killer (NK) cells, metformin enhances cytotoxic activity via the p38 MAPK-dependent JAK/STAT and AKT/mTOR pathways in an AMPK-independent manner [18]. In CD8+ T cells, it downregulates MYC to reduce the competitive tryptophan uptake by tumor cells and restore T cell function [20]. In dendritic cells, metformin induces a tolerogenic phenotype; decreases the expression of MHC-II, co-stimulatory molecules, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-γ); upregulates IL-10 and PD-L1; and facilitates the differentiation of regulatory T cells [21]. In macrophages, it directly enhances antibacterial activity via metabolic reprogramming and AMPK activation, and it also exhibits anti-inflammatory potential [13,22].
In terms of tissue distribution, metformin accumulates dramatically in tissues with high transporter expression, such as the liver and intestine, and its concentration in tumor tissues is higher than that in adipose tissue [16,23]. Such distribution characteristics enable metformin to effectively act on the local immune microenvironment: it promotes the infiltration of NK cells and T cells into tumor tissues [18], inhibits myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and elevates the CD8+/Treg ratio and the expression of T cell inflammation-related genes [24]. Furthermore, in models of bone defects and neuroinflammation, local delivery strategies (e.g., hydrogel scaffolds and nanocarriers) can improve drug retention in target tissues, synergistically facilitating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immunomodulation [25,26].
In conclusion, the immunomodulatory effects of metformin are highly dependent on its effective accumulation in specific tissues and cells. Transporter expression, administration strategies, and microenvironmental conditions collectively determine its pharmacological efficacy. These findings provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the application of metformin in cancer immunotherapy, inflammatory diseases, and other related fields [27,28].

4. Metformin Modulates the Functional Fate of Key Innate Immune Cells

Innate immune cells mainly include macrophages, DC, neutrophils, NK cells, and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Metformin participates in regulating cell function by inducing metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic alterations.

4.1. Macrophage Polarization: Metformin-Mediated Metabolic Regulation of M1/M2 Fate Decisions

Macrophages are highly plastic innate immune cells that can be polarized by lipopolysaccharides (LPS)/interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) into pro-inflammatory, antimicrobial M1 or by interleukin-4 (IL-4)/IL-13 into anti-inflammatory, tissue-reparative M2 phenotypes [29,30]. The balance between these states is critical for immune homeostasis, whereas dysregulation contributes to disease pathogenesis [31,32,33,34]. Macrophage polarization is intimately coupled to cellular metabolism: M1 cells predominantly utilize glycolysis, whereas M2 cells rely on fatty acid oxidation and OXPHOS.
In vitro cellular studies have demonstrated that metformin modulates inflammatory responses in macrophages via activating AMPK. Early work demonstrated metformin-induced AMPK activation in hepatocytes, thereby altering cellular metabolism and inflammatory signaling [35]. Metformin attenuates monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation, downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokine production, attenuates oxidative stress, and promotes M1-to-M2 phenotypic transition. In human vascular smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and endothelial cells, metformin suppresses IL-1-induced IL-6 and IL-8 production and inhibits nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling [36]. In models of saturated fatty acid (FA)-induced low-grade inflammation, metformin attenuates tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-6 expression and secretion in RAW264.7 macrophages via AMPK activation, demonstrating its anti-inflammation capacity [37]. Co-culturing of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) with M1 and M2 macrophages revealed the increased expression of osteogenic genes (Alp, Runx2, Ocn, and Col1a1) in UC-MSCs [38]. These results suggest that metformin-primed macrophages may regulate UC-MSC function and possess therapeutic implications for inflammatory diseases and cancer. Notably, in the tumor microenvironment, metformin can antagonize cancer-induced M2 polarization, upregulate M1-associated cytokines (IL-2, TNF-ɑ), and downregulate M2-associated cytokines (IL-8, IL-10, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)). This effect is partially mediated via the AMPK-NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby remodeling the immunosuppressive tumor niche [39].
Metformin functions through AMPK-independent pathways as well. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging represents another AMPK-independent mechanism underlying the biological activities of metformin. Algire et al. reported that metformin reduces ROS production, thereby protecting cells against DNA damage and mutagenesis [40]. Nguyen et al. further demonstrated that metformin suppresses lithocholic acid (LCA)-induced ROS generation, which in turn blocks the NF-κB signaling pathway. This pathway is essential for the upregulation of interleukin (IL)-8 in human colorectal cancer (CRC) HCT116 cells [41]. Beyond its direct cellular effects, metformin also modulates macrophage function indirectly via the gut microbiota. Metformin enriches short-chain-fatty acid-producing bacteria [42]. The resultant short-chain fatty acids activate GPR43 on the macrophage’s surface and inhibit histone deacetylase (HDAC), thereby promoting macrophage polarization toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and suppressing NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation [43].
As an intrinsic cellular factor linking metabolic pathways and signaling cascades, the NAD+/NADH ratio serves as a core hub governing macrophage activation [44]. During CD40-mediated antitumor immunity, glutamine-to-lactate conversion drives the reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) via precise tuning of the NAD+/NADH ratio; ablation of key metabolic enzymes disrupts this metabolic circuit and abrogates subsequent antitumor efficacy [45]. While no existing literature has directly validated that metformin modulates macrophage activation by altering the NAD+/NADH ratio, the NAD+/NADH axis remains a highly promising therapeutic target for metformin-directed regulation of macrophage antitumor polarization.
Animal studies have also demonstrated that metformin modulates macrophage polarization by regulating multiple critical signaling pathways. In a bronchopulmonary dysplasia model, metformin attenuates lung inflammation in neonatal mice through the downregulation of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling, concomitant reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines, and enhanced pulmonary vascular development [46]. In a rat sciatic nerve injury model, metformin-driven M2 polarization was abrogated by AMPK inhibition, implicating the AMPK/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α(PGC-1α)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) axis as critical for metformin-mediated anti-inflammatory and neuroprotection effects [47,48,49,50,51,52]. Furthermore, in wound healing and tissue repair models, metformin enhances M2 polarization through NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition, thereby accelerating angiogenesis and tissue regeneration [53]. In peripheral nerve injury models, metformin induces M2 macrophage polarization via the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ pathway, promoting functional recovery and remyelination [47]. Similarly, in osteogenic contexts, metformin upregulates anti-inflammatory markers (e.g., cluster of differentiation 206 (CD206), arginase-1(Arg-1)) while suppressing pro-inflammatory gene expression in macrophages, thereby fostering an immunoregulatory microenvironment conducive to tissue homeostasis [54]. In Ang-II-mediated atherosclerosis mouse models, metformin significantly attenuates phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-induced monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and reduces IL-1β, TNF-α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1, CCL2) production via the AMPK-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling, concomitantly ameliorating atherosclerosis lesion severity [55]. Subsequent studies have established that metformin-induced AMPK activation inhibits c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) and STAT3 phosphorylation, thereby reducing pro-inflammatory mediator expression and lipid accumulation [55,56]. In models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metformin attenuates hepatomegaly, reduces micronucleus formation, and ameliorates colonic mucosal injury. Mechanistically, these effects are partially mediated through modulation of macrophage polarization via the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88)/NF-κB/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling axis, alterations in gut microbiota composition, and enhanced production of gut-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [57,58,59,60]. All of these molecular mechanisms are exclusively supported by preclinical data, and their authenticity and applicability in human macrophages remain unclarified.
Literature analyses indicate the obvious context-dependency of metformin’s immunomodulatory properties. Although most preclinical models demonstrate an anti-inflammatory (M2-skewing) effect in chronic metabolic diseases (e.g., obesity, atherosclerosis), contrasting findings have emerged in acute infection and cancer settings. In certain tumor microenvironments, excessive AMPK activation by metformin has been reported to impair macrophage phagocytosis or promote an immunosuppressive phenotype, contingent upon nutrient availability (e.g., glucose deprivation) [61,62]. Furthermore, the discrepancy between in vitro findings (frequently employing supraphysiological concentrations > 1 mM) and in vivo relevance (plasma concentrations ~10–40 μM) remains a major confounding factor. Thus, the pro- versus anti-inflammatory outcomes of metformin are not binary but are dictated by specific metabolic pressures (hypoxia versus nutrient excess), disease stage, and local drug concentrations [63,64]. By contrast, clinical evidence remains limited, largely indirect, and complex. Nevertheless, accumulating data suggest that metformin prevents excessive macrophage activation and attenuates deleterious inflammation in diverse pathological contexts, including autoimmune diseases [65], cardiovascular diseases [66], and metabolic syndromes [67]. Observational studies in patients with T2D consistently demonstrate that long-term metformin treatment reduces circulating inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and TNF-α), correlating with improved insulin sensitivity [68]. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported that metformin significantly reduces C-reactive protein (CRP) levels without concomitant changes in IL-6 or TNF-α [69]. Notably, direct interventional trials specifically assessing tissue-resident macrophage polarization in non-diabetic populations remain scarce, and observed anti-inflammatory effects may be secondary to improved metabolic control. These findings underscore the substantial translational gap between mechanistic insights from animal models and clinical efficacy in humans.
Collectively, evidence for metformin regulating macrophage polarization mainly originates from in vitro cellular experiments and animal models, and some findings have been indirectly validated in observational studies of diabetic populations. To date, no clinical intervention trials focusing on macrophage phenotypes and functions have been conducted. In addition, the drug concentrations used in in vitro experiments differ substantially from physiological concentrations in humans, and conclusions from animal studies cannot be directly extrapolated to human effects. Large-sample clinical studies are still required to further verify the relevant mechanisms and clinical application value of metformin (Figure 1).

4.2. Dendritic Cells: Metformin Reprograms DC Immunometabolism to Balance Immune Activation and Tolerance

DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells that occupy a pivotal position at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity, coordinating the initiation of adaptive immune responses with the maintenance of immune tolerance. DCs exist along a dynamic functional spectrum, ranging from immature DCs to mature DCs. Immature DCs reside at barrier sites, including skin, mucous membranes, and lymphoid tissues, where they enable the rapid detection of pathogens and the release of endogenous damage signals. These cells capture, process, and present antigens while expressing low levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and costimulatory molecules, thereby promoting T-cell tolerance or regulatory T-cell (Treg) induction [70,71]. Upon encountering danger signals such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), including LPS, DCs undergo metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming that upregulates MHC-II expression, costimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86), and chemokine receptors (e.g., c-c chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7) [72,73] while enhancing pro-inflammatory cytokine production (IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ). These cells subsequently load antigenic peptides into MHC-II binding pockets, present them to naïve T cells, and promote effector T-cell priming through coordinated costimulatory and cytokine signals, thereby driving T-cell differentiation toward type 1 T helper cell (Th1)/Th17 lineages [70,71,74]. Thus, DC functional states reflect the integration of environmental cues and intrinsic metabolic programs that determine whether immune activation or tolerance predominates [21,73].
The maturation and activation of dendritic cells are highly dependent on surrounding immune and metabolic signals. Accordingly, the regulatory effects of metformin on these cells vary markedly under different disease conditions. In vitro studies utilizing LPS-stimulated DCs have demonstrated that metformin reduced surface expression of MHC-II, costimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, and CD40), and pro-inflammatory cytokines and their receptors (e.g., TNF-α, IFN-γ, and CCR7), concomitantly enhancing anti-inflammatory signals such as IL-10, without compromising phagocytic activity [75]. These metformin-conditioned DCs exhibit upregulated immunomodulatory molecule expression (e.g., inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand (ICOSL), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)), and an enhanced capacity to promote Treg differentiation. Conversely, through the AMPK-independent inhibition of mitochondrial complex I, metformin can enhance DC activation and maturation under specific conditions [76,77].
Beyond autoimmune contexts, metformin’s effects on DCs extend to diverse immunological processes. For example, studies suggest that metformin modulates DC survival and subset-specific activation, inhibiting plasmacytoid DC activation, which relies on both glycolytic and oxidative metabolism, while exerting variable effects on conventional DC populations. This functional complexity indicates that metformin’s impact on DC function is context-dependent, potentially enhancing antitumor immunity in certain models while promoting tolerance in inflammatory or autoimmune conditions [77,78]. In addition, metformin promotes the production of short-chain fatty acids and indole derivatives via gut microbiota [79]. These metabolites activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and inhibit nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), thereby driving dendritic cells to differentiate into an immune-tolerant phenotype [80]. Short-chain fatty acids upregulate the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and inducible co-stimulatory molecule ligands (ICOSLs) on dendritic cells, reduce the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and ultimately induce the generation of regulatory T cells [81].
Collectively, these findings indicate that metformin intersects with key immunometabolic circuits in DC to modulate the balance between immune activation and tolerance, positioning it as a metabolic modulator of DC fate with implications for autoimmune diseases, cancer immunotherapy, and immune homeostasis. All current evidence regarding the regulatory effects of metformin on dendritic cell function is derived exclusively from in vitro cellular experiments and animal studies, and no relevant human studies have been reported to date. The existing findings are limited by the simplistic conditions of in vitro assays, and extensive follow-up investigations are still required to accumulate data for further clinical translation (Figure 2).

4.3. Neutrophils: Metformin Regulates Functional Plasticity Beyond NETosis Through Metabolic Intervention

Neutrophils are traditionally characterized as short-lived, frontline effectors of innate immunity. Recruited from circulation to sites of infection, injury, or inflammation, these cells eliminate pathogens through phagocytosis, degranulation, ROS generation, and lysozyme secretion [82,83], most notably through the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). NETs are network-like structures composed of nuclear DNA, histones, and antimicrobial proteins that entrap and neutralize pathogens, thereby limiting infection dissemination [84]. Neutrophils possess strong metabolic and functional plasticity and can alter their biological behaviors in response to local inflammatory patterns and microenvironmental characteristics. Accordingly, metformin exerts distinctly different regulatory effects on neutrophils under various pathological conditions.
Beyond their fundamental antimicrobial activity, neutrophils secrete cytokines and chemokines, interact with diverse immune cells, and modulate adaptive immune responses. They are extensively involved in inflammation resolution, tissue repair, and the pathological progression of multiple diseases [85]. Their functional status is largely governed by extrinsic microenvironmental signals. Excessive release, impaired clearance of NETs, or dysregulated cell apoptosis will exacerbate inflammatory injury, and further participate in the onset and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), autoimmune diseases, and malignancies [84,86,87,88].
Beyond their classical inflammatory functions, neutrophils undergo extensive metabolic reprogramming in response to environmental stresses. Under metabolic pressures, including hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, or systemic metabolic dysfunction, neutrophils intricately modulate their metabolic pathways to support specialized functions. For example, shifts between glycolytic and oxidative metabolism influence ROS generation, degranulation capacity, and migratory behavior, thereby shaping inflammatory outcomes [89]. These metabolic adaptations provide the substrate for neutrophil functional reprogramming, linking cellular metabolism to effector heterogeneity beyond the canonical neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis) paradigm.
Animal studies have revealed that metformin targets and modulates neutrophil function via metabolic regulation. In a transgenic zebrafish model of acute inflammation, metformin attenuates neutrophil recruitment to inflamed tissues and dampens inflammatory cytokine expression (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8)). These effects are mediated through the indirect suppression of neutrophil chemotaxis to inflammatory sites [90]. Metformin also attenuates neutrophil infiltration into myocardial tissues, thereby reducing myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and cardiac remodeling in rat myocardial infarction models [91]. Furthermore, metformin alleviates LPS-induced acute lung injury by diminishing MPO activity and inflammatory cell infiltration, underscoring its anti-inflammatory properties. These findings highlight metformin’s potential for modulating excessive neutrophil recruitment and associated inflammatory pathologies. In ARDS, metformin enhances macrophage-mediated clearance of NETs and apoptotic neutrophils [92]. Metformin reduces NETosis and alleviates NET-mediated suppression of osteogenesis, suggesting therapeutic potential in inflammatory and tissue repair contexts [93]. In Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) mouse models, metformin significantly attenuates tumor growth and reduces pro-inflammatory and malignancy-associated molecule expressions through modulation of cancer cell metabolism and inhibition of HMGB1-induced NETosis; additionally, it modulates obesity-driven cancer aggressiveness in high-fat-diet (HFD)-fed mice [94]. In obesity-associated pancreatic cancer, metformin counteracts NETosis pro-tumor effects by reducing PD-L1+ neutrophil recruitment, decreasing NETosis to 60% of control levels, promoting immune cell infiltration, and enhancing antitumor immunity [95]. In addition, metformin ameliorates pathological aberrant responses of neutrophils via remodeling the gut microbiota [96]. It lowers circulating levels of microbiota-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and pro-inflammatory metabolites and attenuates neutrophil chemotaxis, oxidative stress, and NETosis [97].
Clinical studies indicate that metformin reduces the abundance of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) and NETs, elevates the infiltration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and suppresses tumor invasiveness [98]. Both clinical and experimental studies demonstrate that metformin reduces NETosis in endothelial cells through protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation, independently of its glucose-lowering effects. This subsequently diminishes the release of NET components, including elastase, protease-3, histones, and double-stranded DNA [99]. Beyond attenuating NETosis, metformin indirectly modulates neutrophil oxidative burst and inflammatory cytokine production through AMPK activation and suppression of excessive ROS generation, thereby promoting inflammation resolution and limiting host tissue damage.
Beyond these established effects, metformin’s impact on neutrophil metabolism may reshape neutrophil signaling and interactions with other immune cell subsets, potentially altering cytokine profiles and immunoregulatory functions. Beyond these established effects, metformin’s impact on neutrophil metabolism may reshape neutrophil signaling and interactions with other immune cell subsets, potentially altering cytokine profiles and immunoregulatory functions. Although detailed mechanisms remain under investigation, these findings collectively indicate that metformin functions as a modulator of neutrophil plasticity by integrating metabolic control with functional outcomes, thereby expanding its immunomodulatory role from NETosis suppression to broader regulation of neutrophil effector programs. Evidence regarding the regulation of neutrophil functional plasticity by metformin is mainly derived from animal experiments, supplemented by a small number of human observational studies. To date, no targeted clinical intervention trials have been conducted for verification. Given the interspecies differences and distinct microenvironments observed in animal studies, further in-depth validation is required for clinical translation (Figure 3).

4.4. NK Cells and ILCs: Metformin Modulates Cytotoxicity and Immune Homeostasis Through Metabolic Reprogramming

The innate lymphoid cell (ILC) family encompasses multiple subsets, including NK cells and other ILCs, which are classified into three subsets based on cytokine profiles: ILC1 (IFN-γ, TNF-α), ILC2 (IL-5, IL-13, IL-4), and ILC3 (IL-17, IL-22). These cells contribute to immune homeostasis and pathophysiological responses through the production of diverse effector molecules and cytokines [100]. ILCs are enriched at barrier surfaces and mucosal boundaries, constituting a heterogeneous family of effector lymphocytes that mirror T cell functionality without requiring antigen-specific recognition. Among these, NK cells function as cytotoxic sentinels that rapidly recognize and eliminate virally infected or transformed cells, including tumor cells, through perforin, granzyme-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and cytokine secretion (e.g., IFN-γ, TNF-α), thereby executing surveillance and immune regulation [101,102]. In contrast, non-cytotoxic ILC subsets (ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3) contribute to tissue homeostasis, barrier immunity, and type-specific inflammatory responses. NK cell and ILC functional plasticity is orchestrated by distinct metabolic programs, with glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation serving as central regulators of effector differentiation, cytokine production, and survival, thereby directly coupling cellular metabolism to immune adaptability. For instance, glycolytic metabolism supports robust NK cell cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production, whereas ILC2 and ILC3 subsets utilize a balance of glycolysis and lipid metabolism adapted to their specialized roles in type-2 and type-3 immunity, respectively. Disruption of these metabolic pathways can impair effector potency, migratory capacity, and immunoregulatory interactions within inflamed tissues [103,104].
Animal studies demonstrate that metformin modulates NK cells and ILC function by targeting cellular metabolism and energy-sensing pathways. Metformin enhances splenic NK cell cytotoxicity and alters functional phenotypes, specifically upregulating natural killer cell p46-related protein (NKp46+)CD3CD49b+ and FasL+CD3CD49b+ subsets while elevating cytokine production (e.g., IFN-γ) and reducing IL-10+ NK cell frequencies [105], thereby promoting antitumor and antiviral immunity. These alterations are associated with the modulation of miRNA regulatory networks (e.g., upregulation of miRNA-155 and miRNA-150) and downregulation of miRNA-146a, and they occur independently of IDO inhibition [105,106,107,108].
In melanoma models, metformin suppresses tumor growth by attenuating immune evasion through downregulation of PD-L1 expression in both cancer and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, including NK cells and T cells. Mechanistically, this involves reduced AKT-mediated β-catenin S552 phosphorylation and transactivation, alongside PD-1 destabilization through enhanced binding to E3 ubiquitin ligases and subsequent polyubiquitylation [109]. Furthermore, metformin increases ILC2 proportions through AMPKα1 activation, thereby promoting an immunosuppressive microenvironment that attenuates inflammation. This metabolic reprogramming improves functional outcomes in mouse models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although AMPK represents a primary molecular target, metformin may additionally operate through AMPK-independent pathways (e.g., mTOR/pSTAT1 in NK cells) [110]. Notably, HFD-fed mice exhibit impaired glucose tolerance and elevated circulating ILC1 and ILC3 caspase-3 expression. Metformin reduces caspase-3 activation in ILC1s through mechanisms associated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) modulation. These findings collectively indicate that metformin-induced metabolic reprogramming of ILC subsets modulates their immune functions and dampens the inflammatory response [111]. In allergic inflammation models, metformin attenuates ILC2-driven type-2 cytokine production (e.g., IL-5 and IL-13) and airway hyperreactivity, likely through AMPK-independent modulation of glycolysis and fatty acid utilization. This results in diminished ILC2 expansion and effector cytokine secretion [112].
In clinical trials involving head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, metformin combined with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves survival and expands activated peripheral NK cells (CD56dimCD16+). Additionally, metformin enhances NK cells’ tumor infiltration and elevates IFN-γ and perforin expression while reducing CXCL1 levels, effects mediated through mTOR and pSTAT1 pathways rather than AMPK [19].
Collectively, these findings indicate that metformin reprograms metabolic pathways in NK cells and ILC subsets, thereby exerting nuanced effects on their functional dynamics. By modulating energy utilization and signaling pathways, including AMPK and mTOR, metformin enhances beneficial effector functions while preventing excessive or pathological activation. This positions metformin as a metabolic regulator of innate lymphoid effector responses with implications for oncology, infectious diseases, and inflammatory conditions. Relevant evidence regarding the regulation of NK cells and ILCs by metformin is primarily derived from animal model experiments, with only a small number of conclusions supported by clinical intervention trials. Although the overall reliability of the evidence is relatively high, the available clinical samples remain limited, and the underlying mechanisms need further validation (Figure 4).
Metformin exerts multifaceted immunomodulatory effects on four major innate immune cell lineages, encompassing both shared core mechanisms and cell-type-specific regulatory patterns. These effects collectively constitute a sophisticated regulatory network integrating metformin with innate immune cell function. Across macrophages, DC, neutrophils, NK cells, and ILCs, metformin consistently targets cellular metabolic and energy-sensing pathways. Specifically, metformin activates AMPK signaling, suppresses excessive glycolysis, inhibits mitochondrial complex I, and downregulates pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, including NF-κB, mTOR, and STAT pathways. These universal actions limit aberrant inflammatory cytokine secretion, oxidative stress, and pathological immune overactivation, thereby maintaining immune homeostasis.
Conversely, metformin mediates distinct functional reprogramming in a cell-specific manner. In macrophages, metformin drives phenotypic switching from pro-inflammatory M1 toward anti-inflammatory/tissue-repairing M2 polarization. In dendritic cells, metformin skews maturation toward a tolerogenic phenotype, thereby balancing immune activation and tolerance. In neutrophils, metformin restrains excessive recruitment, oxidative burst, and pathological NET formation while facilitating inflammation resolution. In NK cells and ILCs, metformin fine-tunes cytotoxicity, cytokine secretion, and subset composition, thereby enhancing antitumor/antiviral surveillance or alleviating type 2 inflammation. Collectively, these context-dependent, cell-specific effects enable metformin to integrate metabolic control with innate immune cell fate decisions. Table 1 summarizes the effects of metformin on different immune cell types.

5. Metabolic and Epigenetic Mechanisms Underlying Metformin-Mediated Innate Immune Regulation

Immunometabolism investigates the intricate interplay between the immune system and host metabolism. During immune defense, surveillance, and homeostatic maintenance, immune cells undergo substantial metabolic reprogramming. Conversely, the organismal metabolic state profoundly influences immune cell activation, proliferation, differentiation, and effector functions.
Epigenetics encompasses heritable changes in gene expression that occur without alterations to the underlying DNA sequence. Its regulatory mechanisms are multifaceted. DNA methylation, a prevalent epigenetic modification, typically occurs at cytosine residues and is frequently associated with gene silencing in eukaryotes. During tumorigenesis, promoter hypermethylation of specific tumor suppressor genes can inhibit normal gene expression, thereby promoting malignant transformations. Histone modifications, including methylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, phosphorylation, lactylation, crotonylation, succinylation, butyrylation, and propionylation of histone amino acid residues, modulate chromatin structure and function, consequently altering gene accessibility.
In innate immune cells, metabolic processes and epigenetic regulation are essential for effector function execution.

5.1. Glycolysis: A Core Metabolic Pathway in Metformin-Mediated Attenuation of Innate Inflammation

Glycolysis, a fundamental cellular metabolic pathway, catabolizes glucose to pyruvate within the cytoplasm, generating ATP and NADH through sequential enzymatic reactions. As a cornerstone of cellular bioenergetics, glycolysis is essential for biosynthesis, proliferation, redox homeostasis maintenance, and immune cell functional regulation [113,114].
Macrophage polarization exhibits distinct metabolic dependencies, and M1 polarization relies predominantly on glycolysis, whereas M2 polarization is coupled to OXPHOS. M1 macrophages display elevated glycolytic activity accompanied by two metabolic breaks in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, resulting in the accumulation of citrate, succinate, and lactate. Conversely, M2 macrophages maintain an intact TCA cycle and depend on OXPHOS for sustained functionality. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) drives M1 macrophage polarization through the upregulation of glycolytic enzymes (e.g., glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1)), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), and inflammatory mediator gene expression [115]. HIF-1α-overexpressing macrophages exhibit diminished mitochondrial oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) and enhanced extracellular acidification rates (ECARs), concomitant with elevated glycolytic intermediates and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) metabolites [116].
Quiescent DCs depend on OXPHOS for homeostatic maintenance. However, upon PAMP engagement of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), DCs undergo metabolic reprogramming from OXPHOS toward glycolysis [117]. This metabolic shift supports immune functionality through energy provision and regulation of key glycolytic enzymes, including hexokinase, phosphofructokinase (PFK), and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) [117,118,119]. This contributes to DC maturation via PI3K/AKT signaling while suppressing AMPK activity. Inflammatory neutrophils depend on glycolysis for energy generation and phagocytic activity. Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) inhibition attenuates neutrophil phagocytosis [120]. Human neutrophils fail to generate NETs in glucose-deprived conditions, and the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) completely abrogates PMA-induced NETosis [121]. Quiescent mature NK cells primarily utilize OXPHOS to meet baseline energy requirements. Upon activation, NK cells upregulate both glycolysis and OXPHOS to satisfy elevated energy demands and support effector molecule synthesis [122].
Metformin primarily regulates glucose metabolism through the inhibition of mitochondrial complex I with the electron transport chain, thereby reducing circulating glucose and ATP production while increasing the AMP/ATP ratio in hepatocytes. This activates the energy sensor AMPK [123]. Metformin also suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis through AMPK activation. However, hepatic gluconeogenic inhibition is not exclusively AMPK-dependent [123]. Metformin suppresses key gluconeogenic enzymes, including glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC), whereas phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1) expression remains unaltered in AMPK- and liver kinase B1 (LKB1)-deficient hepatocytes. Nevertheless, conflicting reports indicate PCK1 inhibition via metformin [124,125]. Notably, glucose production suppression is enhanced in these deficient hepatocytes, suggesting dose-dependent ATP-mediated inhibition potentially involving activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) [123,126]. Collectively, these findings demonstrate LKB1- and AMPK-independent gluconeogenic suppression via metformin.
In macrophages, metformin attenuates M1 polarization and inflammatory response through glycolytic suppression [127]. In neutrophils, metformin diminishes inflammatory activity, phagocytic capacity, and NETosis via attenuated glycolysis [128]. In NK cells, metformin modulates energy metabolism and cellular functionality through metabolic pathway regulation [129]. In DCs, metformin potentially influences antigen presentation and immune functionality through glycolytic modulation [21]. These metabolic regulatory mechanisms may constrain immune system hyperactivation, offering therapeutic potential in inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

5.2. Fatty Acid (FA) Metabolism: Metformin Shapes Innate Immune Cell Function via FAO/FAS Modulation

Fatty acid metabolism, encompassing both catabolism (β-oxidation) and anabolism (de novo lipogenesis), is essential for energy production and cellular homeostasis. During β-oxidation, fatty acids are degraded to generate acetyl-CoA, which subsequently enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle for ATP production. This mitochondrial process comprises three stages: activation, transport, and oxidation. De novo fatty acid synthesis occurs in the cytoplasm, where acetyl-CoA undergoes sequential enzymatic reactions to form FAs subsequently utilized for triglyceride and phospholipid synthesis [130,131].
Macrophage polarization exhibits distinct fatty acid metabolic dependencies: M1 polarization relies predominantly on glycolysis, whereas M2 polarization is coupled to elevated fatty acid oxidation (FAO), OXPHOS, and lipolysis. M2 macrophage FAO is driven by PPAR family members, particularly PPAR-γ and PPAR-δ, which promote OXPHOS to satisfy energy demands [127]. During Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, pulmonary macrophages upregulate FAO through mechanisms partially dependent on TLR2-MAPK signaling and its downstream effector, dual-specificity phosphatase 5 (DUSP5). DUSP5 silencing elevates free fatty acid and triglyceride levels while suppressing FAO-related genes, including CPT1A and PPAR-α. This attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine production (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6) and suppresses NF-κB signaling [132,133,134].
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) exhibit functional dichotomy: M1-like TAMs enhance anti-tumor immunity through ADCC and antigen presentation, whereas M2-like TAMs promote tumor progression by inducing immune tolerance. Unsaturated long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), such as oleic acid, drive M2 polarization through PPAR-γ signaling enhancement and FAO upregulation, thereby inducing immunosuppression. Tumor-microenvironment (TME)-derived protein S100A4 critically regulates TAM polarization through PPAR-γ and FAO modulation. S100A4-deficient macrophages fail to upregulate FAO, thereby maintaining pro-inflammatory and anti-tumor phenotypes [131].
FAO significantly influences DC differentiation and functionality. FAO and AMPK inhibition promote conventional DC differentiation, whereas diminished ROS enhances conventional DC1 proportions [135,136]. Beyond differentiation, FAO modulates DC functionality: Saturated fats activate TLRs to induce costimulatory molecules, MHC molecules, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) suppress LPS-driven pro-inflammatory signaling and prevent DC activation. TLR activation triggers de novo fatty acid synthesis and lipid droplet formation while downregulating FAO, thereby establishing an energy reservoir for DC activation and T-cell priming [136]. Nevertheless, excessive lipid accumulation impairs DC functionality and disrupts T-cell activation [137]. Furthermore, FAO is associated with tolerogenic DC development, which maintains immune tolerance through Treg induction and anti-inflammatory cytokine production (e.g., IL-10 and TGF-β) [137].
FAO is essential for neutrophil metabolism and functionality, particularly in glucose-deprived microenvironments where FAO generates energy through autophagy-mediated lipid catabolism [138]. In mature neutrophils, FAO is dispensable for basal energy production yet crucial for effector functions, including NETosis [139]. SCFAs additionally regulate neutrophil apoptosis, chemotaxis, and ROS production [140].
FAO additionally modulates lipid metabolic states and functionality of ILCs and NK cells. ILC2s, the predominant tissue-resident ILC population in pulmonary tissues, depend on FAO for pro-inflammatory [141]. In allergen-induced airway inflammation models, ILC2s internalize exogenous lipids (e.g., palmitic acid) and sequester them as lipid droplets. Subsequent lipid oxidation occurs through an IL-33-initiated, PPAR-γ- and diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1)-mediated process, thereby expanding pro-inflammatory ILC2 populations within the lung [142]. In allergic asthma models, autophagy deficiency in activated ILC2s impairs FAO utilization, inducing a metabolic shift toward glycolysis. This disruption compromises ILC2 homeostasis and Th2 cytokine production while attenuating ILC2-mediated pulmonary inflammation [143]. During acute retroviral infection, NK cells upregulate CD36 expression, a critical mediator of FAs uptake. Activated NK cells exhibit metabolic flexibility, utilizing FAs (e.g., linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and oleic acid) as energy substrates, with elevated FAO correlating with enhanced cytotoxicity [144].
Metformin modulates fatty acid metabolism through diverse mechanisms. In intestinal epithelial cells, metformin suppresses apolipoproteins synthesis (ApoA-IV and ApoB-48) through AMPK and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) activation, thereby attenuating triglyceride synthesis and inhibiting chylomicron formation and secretion. Additionally, metformin diminishes intestinal bile acid reabsorption and enhances chylomicron clearance, consequently reducing circulating cholesterol. In adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, metformin promotes FAO, resulting in diminished adiposity, reduced very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL-TG) levels, and decreased brown adipose tissue (BAT) lipid droplet content. Metformin enhances fatty acid utilization and oxidative phosphorylation through upregulation of mitochondrial respiratory chain components, activates lipolytic enzymes to stimulate lipolysis, and improves adipose tissue fatty acid uptake and utilization. Furthermore, metformin induces fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) production, thereby reducing fat mass and enhancing FAO in white adipocytes of obese mice. In skeletal muscle, metformin attenuates lipid accumulation in ob/ob mice through FAO promotion and downregulation of genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and acyl-CoA metabolism [145].
Metformin modulates immune cell functionality and phenotypes through fatty acid metabolic regulation. In macrophages, metformin promotes M2 polarization through FAO and OXPHOS enhancement, thereby augmenting anti-inflammatory and tissue-reparative functions. In TAMs, metformin potentially suppresses FAO to inhibit M2 polarization, consequently enhancing anti-tumor activity [127]. Metformin disrupts lipid metabolic homeostasis in DCs, perturbing the balance between fatty acid synthesis (FAS) and FAO. Specifically, metformin enhances glucose utilization and glycolysis while suppressing the TCA cycle and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) through forkhead box O3 (FoxO3) signaling. This induces fatty acid and lactate accumulation while diminishing DC synthetic metabolism, thereby generating metabolic states conducive to tolerogenic functionality [21]. Nevertheless, fatty acid metabolic mechanisms in other innate immune cell subsets require further investigation.

5.3. Epigenetic Reprogramming: Metformin Modulates Innate Immunity via DNA/Histone Modification and ncRNA Regulation

Epigenetics encompasses heritable alterations in gene activity without DNA sequence modification. Four primary mechanisms underlie epigenetic regulation: DNA methylation, chromatin structural modulation, histone post-translational modifications, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA)-mediated regulation [146]. These mechanisms profoundly modulate innate immune functions.
Metformin modulates DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and cellular metabolism via the AMPK signaling pathway, thereby remodeling the genome-wide DNA methylation landscape of immune cells. On the one hand, metformin activates AMPK to directly suppress the activity of DNMTs. On the other hand, it indirectly regulates the intracellular levels of DNMT inhibitors, triggering differential demethylation or hypermethylation in gene promoter regions and altering the expression of immune-related genes [147,148]. Clinical studies have demonstrated that short-term administration of metformin at therapeutic doses can alter the methylation status of 125 CpG sites in peripheral blood leukocytes from healthy individuals. Among these, protein O-fucosyltransferase 2 (POFUT2), calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 1 (CAMKK1), and up-frameshift protein 1 (UPF1) are stably differentially methylated loci, which regulate genes involved in energy homeostasis and inflammatory responses and further mediate the functional changes in innate immunity [149]. In patients with type 2 diabetes, metformin intervention leads to methylation alterations at 26 CpG sites in peripheral blood, predominantly presenting as hypermethylation. Methylation changes at the PBX/Knotted homeobox 2 (PKNOX2), WD and tetratricopeptide repeat 1 (WDTC1), and MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence B (MICB) loci mediate the anti-inflammatory and hypoglycemic effects of metformin [150]. Mechanistically, metformin elevates the SAM:SAH ratio by regulating mitochondrial serine one-carbon metabolism and the activity of mitochondrial complex I, which promotes global DNA methylation. Meanwhile, it downregulates the expression of methylation- and demethylation-related genes such as DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 (TET1), and it stabilizes the epigenetic status of immune cells [151,152].
Metformin differentially regulates the activity of various histone-modifying enzymes, mediating specific changes in histone acetylation, methylation, and lactylation and further modulating inflammation and functional activation of innate immune cells. In terms of histone acetylation regulation, metformin exerts divergent effects on histone acetyltransferase (HAT) family members: It increases the activity of HAT1 while inhibiting E1A-binding protein p300 (p300) and CREB-binding protein (CBP). It also indirectly suppresses class I/II histone deacetylases (HDACs) and enhances the activity of silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1), a longevity-associated class III HDAC, to maintain cellular homeostasis and immune balance [153,154,155,156].
For histone methylation, metformin alters histone methylation patterns by regulating the expression of histone methyltransferases (HMTs). Its regulatory effects on immune gene expression are either activating or repressive depending on the cellular microenvironment [157]. Additionally, metformin directly binds to and inhibits methyltransferases, including coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) and protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6); reduces the levels of histone H3 asymmetric dimethyl-arginine 17 (H3R17me2a) and histone H3 arginine 2 asymmetric dimethylation (H3R2me2a) modifications; and participates in the regulation of metabolism- and immune-related genes [158,159]. In inflammatory immune cells, metformin reverses the LPS-induced elevation of histone H3 lysine 14 (H3K14) acetylation in monocytes, inhibits the secretion of chemokines interferon γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and alleviates inflammatory responses [160,161]. In a zebrafish inflammation model, metformin downregulates H3K18 lactylation in neutrophils, reduces ROS production and neutrophil recruitment, and suppresses local inflammation [90]. Furthermore, metformin modulates the proliferation and apoptosis of immune cells by regulating H3K9 and H3K18 acetylation in combination with long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) regulatory pathways [162].
Metformin regulates the functions of innate immune cells at the post-transcriptional level by modulating the biogenesis and expression of non-coding RNAs. It upregulates the expression of endoribonuclease dicer (DICER), a key enzyme for microRNA (miRNA) biosynthesis, and thereby modulates the expression of multiple miRNAs associated with various diseases and immunity [163]. In natural killer (NK) cells, metformin upregulates immunostimulatory miR-150 and miR-155 and downregulates immunosuppressive miR-146a. These changes markedly enhance NK cell cytotoxicity, increase the expression of NKp46, FasL, and IFN-γ, inhibit the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and remodel the immune functions of NK cells [105]. Moreover, metformin regulates the expression of lncRNAs such as metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), which is involved in inflammatory modulation and anti-tumor immunity. Its regulatory actions cover glucose metabolism and systemic inflammation across multiple tissues and cell types [162,164].
The epigenetic regulatory effects of metformin are tightly linked to its profound impacts on cellular metabolism. Accumulating evidence indicates that metformin activates AMPK to modulate the activities of epigenetic modifying enzymes, including HATs, HDACs, and DNMTs, consequently altering histone and DNA modifications as well as the expression of downstream genes [165]. Meanwhile, metabolite-derived chromatin modifications (e.g., acetyl-CoA, α-ketoglutarate, and SAM) are modulated by metformin at both local and systemic levels. By targeting global metabolic pathways or enzymes responsible for generating chromatin-modifying metabolites, metformin indirectly governs the activation state of chromatin remodelers. It also affects the interactions among metformin, diet, and gut microbiota, thereby systematically regulating metabolic inputs to chromatin [166]. This coupled metabolism–epigenetics mechanism provides a theoretical basis for the therapeutic potential of metformin in non-diabetic disorders such as cancer.

6. Future Perspectives and Clinical Translation: Decoupling Efficacy from Toxicity

Despite the increasingly recognized immunomodulatory potential of metformin, its clinical translation remains constrained by an unresolved tension between efficacy and toxicity. This dichotomy stems from its dual mechanism of action. On the one hand, mitochondrial complex I inhibition effectively suppresses tumorigenesis [167] and attenuates excessive inflammatory responses [168]. On the other hand, elevated systemic exposure to this same mechanism may precipitate global energetic deficit, thereby increasing lactic acidosis risk [169] and gastrointestinal intolerance. Conversely, sub-therapeutic dosing, while safer, may fail to achieve the threshold necessary for AMPK-dependent immunometabolic reprogramming. Thus, the central challenge lies not in establishing metformin’s efficacy but in optimizing its deployment to preserve therapeutic benefits while circumventing systemic metabolic stress.
To address this, future translational efforts should move beyond conventional dose escalation and instead focus on mechanism-informed precision strategies. ① Targeting Alternative Pathways to Reduce Complex I-Dependent Toxicity: Emerging evidence suggests that metformin engages additional molecular targets beyond mitochondrial complex I. Notably, PEN2, a component of the lysosomal v-ATPase–Ragulator complex, has been identified as a critical mediator of metformin-induced AMPK activation at the lysosomal surface [170]. In parallel, mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (mGPD) has also been implicated as a direct target influencing redox balance and gluconeogenesis [171]. These findings open the possibility of designing next-generation biguanides or small molecules that selectively engage the PEN2-AMPK axis without profound inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Such an approach could, in principle, retain immunometabolic benefits while mitigating lactate accumulation and systemic toxicity. ② Tissue- or Cell-Specific Delivery Strategies: Another promising direction lies in improving the spatial precision of drug delivery. Nanoparticle-based systems have been explored to selectively deliver metformin to specific tissues, including lymphoid organs and the tumor microenvironment (TME), thereby achieving locally effective concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure [172]. Targeting immune niches such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) or Treg may enhance immunomodulatory efficacy without amplifying off-target toxicity in metabolically sensitive organs such as the liver or intestine. This spatial decoupling of exposure and effect represents a critical step toward improving the therapeutic index. ③ Precision Medicine and Patient Stratification: Inter-individual variability in response to metformin is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of clinical outcome. Genetic polymorphisms in organic cation transporters (OCT1/SLC22A1), which regulate the cellular uptake of metformin, have been shown to influence both pharmacokinetics and therapeutic response [173]. In addition, baseline immunometabolic states may further modulate responsiveness. Future clinical trials should therefore incorporate molecular stratification and metabolic phenotyping to guide dosing strategies. Such an approach may allow maximization of immunological benefits within a defined safety window rather than relying on uniform dosing paradigms.
In summary, the future of metformin as an immunomodulatory agent does not lie in increasing dose intensity but in refining target engagement. Decoupling beneficial signaling pathways—such as AMPK/PEN2 activation—from the deleterious consequences of mitochondrial respiratory inhibition will be essential. Achieving this balance will likely determine whether metformin can be repositioned as a safe and effective therapy for cancer and inflammatory and metabolic diseases. Table 2 summarizes the potential applications of metformin.

7. Conclusions

Metformin is a multifunctional immunometabolic regulator with metabolic and immune-modulating properties. Its anti-inflammatory efficacy in type 2 diabetes is clinically validated, and preclinical and early clinical studies have revealed its promising potential in chronic inflammatory diseases, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and tumor immunotherapy. However, its roles in tissue repair, infection control, and trained immunity remain only theoretical, requiring further clinical verification.
Current mechanistic studies of metformin rely largely on animal and in vitro experiments that cannot fully simulate human pharmacological conditions. Existing clinical data are mainly derived from diabetic patients, rendering it difficult to define its immune-modulatory dosage independent of hypoglycemic effects. In addition, the long-term safety of its persistent remodeling of innate immunity remains unclear.
Future studies should conduct clinical trials targeting immune endpoints in non-diabetic populations and optimize experimental models with physiologically equivalent drug concentrations. In addition, novel metformin derivatives and delivery systems should be developed, targeted drug delivery should be advanced, and metformin’s therapeutic potential in inflammatory and immune-related diseases should be maximized.

Author Contributions

S.X.: conceived the idea, designed and re-edited the work. Y.S. designed and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grant 82172763 (S.X.) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Netea, M.G.; Quintin, J.; van der Meer, J.W.M. Trained Immunity: A Memory for Innate Host Defense. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aaby, P.; Roth, A.; Ravn, H.; Napirna, B.M.; Rodrigues, A.; Lisse, I.M.; Stensballe, L.; Diness, B.R.; Lausch, K.R.; Lund, N.; et al. Randomized Trial of BCG Vaccination at Birth to Low-Birth-Weight Children: Beneficial Nonspecific Effects in the Neonatal Period? J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Netea, M.G.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Latz, E.; Mills, K.H.G.; Natoli, G.; Stunnenberg, H.G.; O’neill, L.A.J.; Xavier, R.J. Trained immunity: A program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science 2016, 352, aaf1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, S.; Zou, Y.; McMasters, A.; Chen, F.; Yan, J. Trained immunity: A new player in cancer immunotherapy. eLife 2025, 14, e104920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Netea, M.G.; Domínguez-Andrés, J.; Barreiro, L.B.; Chavakis, T.; Divangahi, M.; Fuchs, E.; Joosten, L.A.B.; van der Meer, J.W.M.; Mhlanga, M.M.; Mulder, W.J.M.; et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ausubel, F.M. Are innate immune signaling pathways in plants and animals conserved? Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Janeway, C.A. Approaching the Asymptote? Evolution and Revolution in Immunology. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1989, 54, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fei, Q.; Huang, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Fu, Q. Immunometabolic Interactions in Obesity: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Su, W.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Dong, N.; Li, Y.; Fan, Q.; Lin, H.; Wu, S.; Wu, C. The Microbial Regulation Spectrum of Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Individual-Based Meta-Analysis of 1431 Participants. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 110, 2383–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Shi, L.; Wang, A.; Gao, X.; Leng, H. The nasal-oral microbiome axis in allergic rhinitis: Environmental triggers, microbial dysbiosis, and immune dysregulation. Front. Allergy 2026, 7, 1799085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Xiao, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, S.; Jiang, N.; Yu, C.; Zhu, X.; Qin, Y.; Hui, J.; Meng, L.; Song, C.; et al. Metformin promotes innate immunity through a conserved PMK-1/p38 MAPK pathway. Virulence 2020, 11, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, G.-Y.; Feng, Y.-Q.; Jia, Y.-F.; Wang, K.-F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S.-J.; Han, S.-X.; Wang, J.-C. Metformin enhances T lymphocyte anti-tumor immunity by increasing the infiltration via vessel normalization. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 944, 175592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xiong, W.; Sun, K.-Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Zou, X. Metformin alleviates inflammation through suppressing FASN-dependent palmitoylation of Akt. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, W.-H.; Dai, Y.-D.; Feng, W.-K.; Chen, H.-R.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Jiang, L.; Liu, X.-D.; Liu, L. Clozapine impaired the hypoglycemic effect of metformin by inhibiting hepatic organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1). Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2026, 47, 1338–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Caturano, A.; Nilo, D.; Nilo, R.; Sircana, M.C.; Erul, E.; Zielińska, K.; Russo, V.; Santonastaso, E.; Sasso, F.C. Old Drug, New Science: Metformin and the Future of Pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Du, Y.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Ding, J.; Liu, J.-Y. Metformin in therapeutic applications in human diseases: Its mechanism of action and clinical study. Mol. Biomed. 2022, 3, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Swenson, K.S.; Wang, D.; Jones, A.K.; Nash, M.J.; O’rOurke, R.; Takahashi, D.L.; Kievit, P.; Hennebold, J.D.; Aagaard, K.M.; Friedman, J.E.; et al. Metformin Disrupts Signaling and Metabolism in Fetal Hepatocytes. Diabetes 2023, 72, 1214–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xia, W.; Qi, X.; Li, M.; Wu, Y.; Sun, L.; Fan, X.; Yuan, Y.; Li, J. Metformin promotes anticancer activity of NK cells in a p38 MAPK dependent manner. OncoImmunology 2021, 10, 1995999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Crist, M.; Yaniv, B.; Palackdharry, S.; Lehn, M.A.; Medvedovic, M.; Stone, T.; Gulati, S.; Karivedu, V.; Borchers, M.; Fuhrman, B.; et al. Metformin increases natural killer cell functions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through CXCL1 inhibition. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e005632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Huang, X.; Sun, T.; Wang, J.; Hong, X.; Chen, H.; Yan, T.; Zhou, C.; Sun, D.; Yang, C.; Yu, T.; et al. Metformin Reprograms Tryptophan Metabolism to Stimulate CD8+ T-cell Function in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2023, 83, 2358–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liu, X.; Yu, P.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Tang, F.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Liu, L.; Qiu, W.; et al. Metformin induces tolerogenicity of dendritic cells by promoting metabolic reprogramming. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2023, 80, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mediaas, S.D.; Haug, M.; Louet, C.; Wahl, S.G.F.; Gidon, A.; Flo, T.H. Metformin improves Mycobacterium avium infection by strengthening macrophage antimicrobial functions. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1463224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bhati, F.K.; Bhat, M.K. An anti-neoplastic tale of metformin through its transport. Life Sci. 2024, 357, 123060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Veeramachaneni, R.; Yu, W.; Newton, J.M.; Kemnade, J.O.; Skinner, H.D.; Sikora, A.G.; Sandulache, V.C. Metformin generates profound alterations in systemic and tumor immunity with associated antitumor effects. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, H.; Mao, B.; Zhong, J.; Li, X.; Sang, H. Localized delivery of metformin via 3D printed GelMA-Nanoclay hydrogel scaffold for enhanced treatment of diabetic bone defects. J. Orthop. Transl. 2024, 47, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, L.; Sun, C.; Cai, S.; Hang, Z.; Gao, X.; Hou, L.; Li, L.; Wu, Y.; Xing, C.; Du, H. Biomimetic Nanoparticles Enhance Recovery of Movement Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease by Improving Microglial Mitochondrial Homeostasis and Suppressing Neuroinflammation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 23536–23552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ton Nu, Q.C.; Park, P.-H. Metabolic modulation of CD8+ T cells by metformin: A promising adjuvant strategy for CD8+ T Cell-Based Immunotherapies. Pharmacol. Res. 2025, 222, 108015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lv, H.; Gong, H.; Zhao, R.; Gao, X.; Liu, W.; Zhao, L.; Sun, R. From basics to clinics: New opportunities for metformin in tumor metabolic intervention and treatment. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2025, 191, 118507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Blériot, C.; Chakarov, S.; Ginhoux, F. Determinants of Resident Tissue Macrophage Identity and Function. Immunity 2020, 52, 957–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mantovani, A.; Sica, A.; Sozzani, S.; Allavena, P.; Vecchi, A.; Locati, M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gabrilovich, D.I.; Ostrand-Rosenberg, S.; Bronte, V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Smith, A.M.; Rahman, F.Z.; Hayee, B.; Graham, S.J.; Marks, D.J.; Sewell, G.W.; Palmer, C.D.; Wilde, J.; Foxwell, B.M.; Gloger, I.S.; et al. Disordered macrophage cytokine secretion underlies impaired acute inflammation and bacterial clearance in Crohn’s disease. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1883–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Melgert, B.N.; Oriss, T.B.; Qi, Z.; Dixon-McCarthy, B.; Geerlings, M.; Hylkema, M.N.; Ray, A. Macrophages. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 42, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lumeng, C.N.; Bodzin, J.L.; Saltiel, A.R. Obesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhou, G.; Myers, R.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X.; Fenyk-Melody, J.; Wu, M.; Ventre, J.; Doebber, T.; Fujii, N.; et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Isoda, K.; Young, J.L.; Zirlik, A.; MacFarlane, L.A.; Tsuboi, N.; Gerdes, N.; Schönbeck, U.; Libby, P. Metformin Inhibits Proinflammatory Responses and Nuclear Factor-κB in Human Vascular Wall Cells. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jing, Y.; Wu, F.; Li, D.; Yang, L.; Li, Q.; Li, R. Metformin improves obesity-associated inflammation by altering macrophages polarization. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 461, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Shen, M.; Yu, H.; Jin, Y.; Mo, J.; Sui, J.; Qian, X.; Chen, T. Metformin Facilitates Osteoblastic Differentiation and M2 Macrophage Polarization by PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int. 2022, 2022, 9498876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chiang, C.-F.; Chao, T.-T.; Su, Y.-F.; Hsu, C.-C.; Chien, C.-Y.; Chiu, K.-C.; Shiah, S.-G.; Lee, C.-H.; Liu, S.-Y.; Shieh, Y.-S. Metformin-treated cancer cells modulate macrophage polarization through AMPK-NF-κB signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20706–20718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cekuc, M.S.; Ergul, Y.S.; Pius, A.K.; Meagan, M.; Shinohara, I.; Murayama, M.; Susuki, Y.; Ma, C.; Morita, M.; Chow, S.K.-H.; et al. Metformin Modulates Cell Oxidative Stress to Mitigate Corticosteroid-Induced Suppression of Osteogenesis in a 3D Model. J. Inflamm. Res. 2024, 17, 10383–10396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lai, X.; Liu, B.; Wan, Y.; Zhou, P.; Li, W.; Hu, W.; Gong, W. Metformin alleviates colitis-associated colorectal cancer via inhibition of the TLR4/MyD88/NFκB/MAPK pathway and macrophage M2 polarization. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 144, 113683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kang, J.; Li, C.; Gao, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, C.; Luo, D. Metformin inhibits tumor growth and affects intestinal flora in diabetic tumor-bearing mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 912, 174605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ikeda, T.; Nishida, A.; Yamano, M.; Kimura, I. Short-chain fatty acid receptors and gut microbiota as therapeutic targets in metabolic, immune, and neurological diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 239, 108273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tang, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Chang, T.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Hou, J.; Luo, Y.; Li, M.; Huang, J.; et al. Disruption of glucose homeostasis by bacterial infection orchestrates host innate immunity through NAD+/NADH balance. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 114648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, P.-S.; Chen, Y.-T.; Li, X.; Hsueh, P.-C.; Tzeng, S.-F.; Chen, H.; Shi, P.-Z.; Xie, X.; Parik, S.; Planque, M.; et al. CD40 signal rewires fatty acid and glutamine metabolism for stimulating macrophage anti-tumorigenic functions. Nat. Immunol. 2023, 24, 452–462, Correction in Nat. Immunol. 2023, 24, 1591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-023-01611-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xiang, X.; Zhou, L.; Lin, Z.; Qu, X.; Chen, Y.; Xia, H. Metformin regulates macrophage polarization via the Shh signaling pathway to improve pulmonary vascular development in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. IUBMB Life 2022, 74, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhou, Z.; Luo, G.; Li, C.; Zhang, P.; Chen, W.; Li, X.; Tang, J.; Qing, L. Metformin induces M2 polarization via AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ pathway to improve peripheral nerve regeneration. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2023, 15, 3778–3792. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Corona, J.C.; Duchen, M.R. PPARγ and PGC-1α as Therapeutic Targets in Parkinson’s. Neurochem. Res. 2015, 40, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nijland, P.G.; Witte, M.E.; Van Het Hof, B.; van der Pol, S.; Bauer, J.; Lassmann, H.; van der Valk, P.; de Vries, H.E.; van Horssen, J. Astroglial PGC-1alpha increases mitochondrial antioxidant capacity and suppresses inflammation: Implications for multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2014, 2, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Pasquinelli, A.; Chico, L.; Pasquali, L.; Bisordi, C.; Gerfo, A.L.; Fabbrini, M.; Petrozzi, L.; Marconi, L.; Ienco, E.C.; Mancuso, M.; et al. Gly482Ser PGC-1α Gene Polymorphism and Exercise-Related Oxidative Stress in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, L.; Chen, X.; Su, C.; Wang, Q.; Li, R.; Jiao, W.; Luo, H.; Tian, Y.; Tang, J.; Li, X.; et al. Si-Miao-Yong-An decoction preserves cardiac function and regulates GLC/AMPK/NF-κB and GLC/PPARα/PGC-1α pathways in diabetic mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 132, 110817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ma, C.-H.; Chiua, Y.C.; Wu, C.-H.; Jou, I.-M.; Tu, Y.-K.; Hung, C.-H.; Hsieh, P.-L.; Tsai, K.-L. Homocysteine causes dysfunction of chondrocytes and oxidative stress through repression of SIRT1/AMPK pathway: A possible link between hyperhomocysteinemia and osteoarthritis. Redox Biol. 2018, 15, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Qing, L.; Fu, J.; Wu, P.; Zhou, Z.; Yu, F.; Tang, J. Metformin induces the M2 macrophage polarization to accelerate the wound healing via regulating AMPK/mTOR/NLRP3 inflammasome singling pathway. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Fan, S.; Zhang, C.; Sun, X.; Su, C.; Xue, Y.; Song, X.; Deng, R. Metformin enhances osteogenic differentiation of BMSC by modulating macrophage M2 polarization. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Vasamsetti, S.B.; Karnewar, S.; Kanugula, A.K.; Thatipalli, A.R.; Kumar, J.M.; Kotamraju, S. Metformin Inhibits Monocyte-to-Macrophage Differentiation via AMPK-Mediated Inhibition of STAT3 Activation: Potential Role in Atherosclerosis. Diabetes 2015, 64, 2028–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Jiang, B.; Cohen, R.A.; Zang, M. Activation of Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein and NLRP3 Inflammasome in Atherosclerotic Lesion Development in Diabetic Pigs. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. de Oliveira, S.; Houseright, R.A.; Graves, A.L.; Golenberg, N.; Korte, B.G.; Miskolci, V.; Huttenlocher, A. Metformin modulates innate immune-mediated inflammation and early progression of NAFLD-associated hepatocellular carcinoma in zebrafish. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Park, E.J.; Lee, J.H.; Yu, G.-Y.; He, G.; Ali, S.R.; Holzer, R.G.; Österreicher, C.H.; Takahashi, H.; Karin, M. Dietary and Genetic Obesity Promote Liver Inflammation and Tumorigenesis by Enhancing IL-6 and TNF Expression. Cell 2010, 140, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Matthews, R.P.; Lorent, K.; Mañoral-Mobias, R.; Huang, Y.; Gong, W.; Murray, I.V.J.; Blair, I.A.; Pack, M. TNFα-dependent hepatic steatosis and liver degeneration caused by mutation of zebrafish s-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Development 2009, 136, 865–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Seo, Y.; Kim, J.; Park, S.J.; Park, J.J.; Cheon, J.H.; Kim, W.H.; Kim, T.I. Metformin Suppresses Cancer Stem Cells through AMPK Activation and Inhibition of Protein Prenylation of the Mevalonate Pathway in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Jeong, H.; Kim, S.; Hong, B.-J.; Lee, C.-J.; Kim, Y.-E.; Bok, S.; Oh, J.-M.; Gwak, S.-H.; Yoo, M.Y.; Lee, M.S.; et al. Tumor-Associated Macrophages Enhance Tumor Hypoxia and Aerobic Glycolysis. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ding, L.; Liang, G.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, R.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, H.; Yang, B.; He, Q. Metformin prevents cancer metastasis by inhibiting M2-like polarization of tumor associated macrophages. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 36441–36455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. LaMoia, T.E.; Shulman, G.I. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Metformin Action. Endocr. Rev. 2021, 42, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Foretz, M.; Guigas, B.; Bertrand, L.; Pollak, M.; Viollet, B. Metformin: From Mechanisms of Action to Therapies. Cell Metab. 2014, 20, 953–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, S.; Zhao, M.; Jia, S. Macrophage: Key player in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1080310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Drummer, C.; Saaoud, F.; Shao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xu, K.; Lu, Y.; Ni, D.; Atar, D.; Jiang, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Trained Immunity and Reactivity of Macrophages and Endothelial Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 41, 1032–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Esser, N.; Legrand-Poels, S.; Piette, J.; Scheen, A.J.; Paquot, N. Inflammation as a link between obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014, 105, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fidan, E.; Onder Ersoz, H.; Yilmaz, M.; Yilmaz, H.; Kocak, M.; Karahan, C.; Erem, C. The effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2011, 48, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Karbalaee-Hasani, A.; Khadive, T.; Eskandari, M.; Shahidi, S.; Mosavi, M.; Nejadebrahimi, Z.; Khalkhali, L.; Sangdari, A.; Mohammadi, D.; Soltani, A.; et al. Effect of Metformin on Circulating Levels of Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann. Pharmacother. 2021, 55, 1096–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gardner, A.; de Mingo Pulido, Á.; Ruffell, B. Dendritic Cells and Their Role in Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Théry, C.; Amigorena, S. The cell biology of antigen presentation in dendritic cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2001, 13, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sun, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L. Reprogramming the lipid metabolism of dendritic cells in tumor immunomodulation and immunotherapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 167, 115574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nour, M.A.; Rajabivahid, M.; Mehdi, M.S.S.; Tahmasebi, S.; Dashtgol, S.N.; Dehghani-Ghorbi, M.; Vanan, A.G.; Ghorbaninezhad, F. A new era in melanoma immunotherapy: Focus on DCs metabolic reprogramming. Cancer Cell Int. 2025, 25, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kelly, B.; O’NEill, L.A. Metabolic reprogramming in macrophages and dendritic cells in innate immunity. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shin, S.; Hyun, B.; Lee, A.; Kong, H.; Han, S.; Lee, C.-K.; Ha, N.-J.; Kim, K. Metformin Suppresses MHC-Restricted Antigen Presentation by Inhibiting Co-Stimulatory Factors and MHC Molecules in APCs. Biomol. Ther. 2013, 21, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, N.; Tang, G. Metformin induces tumor immunogenic cell death in ovarian cancer by activating AMPK pathway. Transl. Oncol. 2024, 47, 102052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Turpin, R.; Liu, R.; Munne, P.M.; Peura, A.; Rannikko, J.H.; Philips, G.; Boeckx, B.; Salmelin, N.; Hurskainen, E.; Suleymanova, I.; et al. Respiratory complex I regulates dendritic cell maturation in explant model of human tumor immune microenvironment. J. Immunother. Cancer 2024, 12, e008053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gallucci, S.; Chakhtoura, M.; Lee, M.H.; Qiu, C.C. The metabolic modulator metformin affects the activation and survival of murine dendritic cell subsets. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 180.17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Petakh, P.; Kamyshna, I.; Kamyshnyi, A. Unveiling the potential pleiotropic effects of metformin in treating COVID-19: A comprehensive review. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1260633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Cui, X.; Ye, Z.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Jiao, C.; Ma, J.; Tang, N.; Zhang, H. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation ameliorates experimental colitis by modulating the tolerogenic dendritic and regulatory T cell formation. Cell Biosci. 2022, 12, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Blanco-Pérez, F.; Steigerwald, H.; Schülke, S.; Vieths, S.; Toda, M.; Scheurer, S. The Dietary Fiber Pectin: Health Benefits and Potential for the Treatment of Allergies by Modulation of Gut Microbiota. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021, 21, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Malech, H.L.; DeLeo, F.R.; Quinn, M.T. The Role of Neutrophils in the Immune System: An Overview. In Neutrophil; Quinn, M.T., DeLeo, F.R., Eds.; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  83. Mantovani, A.; Cassatella, M.A.; Costantini, C.; Jaillon, S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jia, W.; Zhang, J.; Shang, Y.; Liu, S. Multitarget natural compounds taming NETosis: A translational strategy for cancer and inflammatory diseases. Cancer Lett. 2026, 636, 218103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mayadas, T.N.; Cullere, X.; Lowell, C.A. The Multifaceted Functions of Neutrophils. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2014, 9, 181–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Teijeira, A.; Garasa, S.; Ochoa, M.C.; Villalba, M.; Olivera, I.; Cirella, A.; Eguren-Santamaria, I.; Berraondo, P.; Schalper, K.A.; de Andrea, C.E.; et al. IL8, Neutrophils, and NETs in a Collusion against Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 2383–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Castanheira, F.V.S.; Kubes, P. Neutrophils and NETs in modulating acute and chronic inflammation. Blood 2019, 133, 2178–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Mutua, V.; Gershwin, L.J. A Review of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in Disease: Potential Anti-NETs Therapeutics. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2021, 61, 194–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gysemans, C.; Beya, M.; Pedace, E.; Mathieu, C. Exploring Neutrophil Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Health and Disease. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhou, R.; Ding, R.-C.; Yu, Q.; Qiu, C.-Z.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Yin, Z.-J.; Ren, D.-L. Metformin Attenuates Neutrophil Recruitment through the H3K18 Lactylation/Reactive Oxygen Species Pathway in Zebrafish. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Soraya, H.; Rameshrad, M.; Mokarizadeh, A.; Garjani, A. Metformin attenuates myocardial remodeling and neutrophil recruitment after myocardial infarction in rat. BioImpacts 2015, 5, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Grégoire, M.; Uhel, F.; Lesouhaitier, M.; Gacouin, A.; Guirriec, M.; Mourcin, F.; Dumontet, E.; Chalin, A.; Samson, M.; Berthelot, L.-L.; et al. Impaired efferocytosis and neutrophil extracellular trap clearance by macrophages in ARDS. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 52, 1702590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhu, W.; Xu, D.; Mei, J.; Lu, B.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X. Metformin reverses impaired osteogenesis due to hyperglycemia-induced neutrophil extracellular traps formation. Bone 2023, 176, 116889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chen, C.-J.; Wu, C.-C.; Chang, C.-Y.; Li, J.-R.; Ou, Y.-C.; Chen, W.-Y.; Liao, S.-L.; Wang, J.-D. Metformin Mitigated Obesity-Driven Cancer Aggressiveness in Tumor-Bearing Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, G.; Gao, H.; Dai, S.; Li, M.; Gao, Y.; Yin, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, K.; Miao, Y.; et al. Metformin inhibits neutrophil extracellular traps-promoted pancreatic carcinogenesis in obese mice. Cancer Lett. 2023, 562, 216155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chow, E.; Yang, A.; Chung, C.H.L.; Chan, J.C.N. A Clinical Perspective of the Multifaceted Mechanism of Metformin in Diabetes, Infections, Cognitive Dysfunction, and Cancer. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Nakayama, M.; Miyakawa, H.; Ohama, K.; Kimura, H. A Critical Role of Neutrophil-Driven Amplification of Chronic Microinflammation in the Biocompatibility of Hemodialysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Saito, A.; Koinuma, K.; Kawashima, R.; Miyato, H.; Ohzawa, H.; Horie, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kawahira, H.; Mimura, T.; Kitayama, J.; et al. Metformin may improve the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus partly through effects on neutrophil extracellular traps. BJC Rep. 2023, 1, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Menegazzo, L.; Scattolini, V.; Cappellari, R.; Bonora, B.M.; Albiero, M.; Bortolozzi, M.; Romanato, F.; Ceolotto, G.; de Kreutzeberg, S.V.; Avogaro, A.; et al. The antidiabetic drug metformin blunts NETosis in vitro and reduces circulating NETosis biomarkers in vivo. Acta Diabetol. 2018, 55, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Srivastava, R.K.; Sapra, L.; Bhardwaj, A.; Mishra, P.K.; Verma, B.; Baig, Z. Unravelling the immunobiology of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs): Implications in health and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2023, 74, 56–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Montaldo, E.; Zotto, G.D.; Chiesa, M.D.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, A.; Maria, A.D.; Moretta, L. Human NK cell receptors/markers: A tool to analyze NK cell development, subsets and function. Cytom. Part A 2013, 83A, 702–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, Y.; Lu, D.; Churov, A.; Fu, R. Research Progress on NK Cell Receptors and Their Signaling Pathways. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 6437057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Lv, Z.; Bian, Z.; Shi, L.; Niu, S.; Ha, B.; Tremblay, A.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Paluszynski, J.; Liu, M.; et al. Loss of Cell Surface CD47 Clustering Formation and Binding Avidity to SIRPα Facilitate Apoptotic Cell Clearance by Macrophages. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tojo, M.; Miyato, H.; Koinuma, K.; Horie, H.; Tsukui, H.; Kimura, Y.; Kaneko, Y.; Ohzawa, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Yoshimura, K.; et al. Metformin combined with local irradiation provokes abscopal effects in a murine rectal cancer model. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Petrovic, A.R.; Jovanovic, I.P.; Jurisevic, M.M.; Jovanovic, M.Z.; Jovanovic, M.M.; Pavlovic, S.P.; Arsenijevic, N.N.; Supic, G.M.; Vojvodic, D.V.; Jovanovic, M.M.; et al. Metformin promotes antitumor activity of NK cells via overexpression of miRNA-150 and miRNA-155. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2023, 15, 2727–2737. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Liu, B.; Li, J.; Cairns, M.J. Identifying miRNAs, targets and functions. Brief. Bioinform. 2014, 15, S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Xu, D.; Han, Q.; Hou, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J. miR-146a negatively regulates NK cell functions via STAT1 signaling. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 14, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Cui, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Tun, N.; Peng, Y.; Yu, J. Regulation of Human Natural Killer Cell IFN-γ Production by MicroRNA-146a via Targeting the NF-κB Signaling Pathway. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Park, S.H.; Lee, J.; Yun, H.J.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, J.-H. Metformin Suppresses Both PD-L1 Expression in Cancer Cells and Cancer-Induced PD-1 Expression in Immune Cells to Promote Antitumor Immunity. Ann. Lab. Med. 2024, 44, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Baban, B.; Braun, M.; Khodadadi, H.; Ward, A.; Alverson, K.; Malik, A.; Nguyen, K.; Nazarian, S.; Hess, D.C.; Forseen, S.; et al. AMPK induces regulatory innate lymphoid cells after traumatic brain injury. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e126766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Mxinwa, V.; Nkambule, B.B.; Nyambuya, T.M.; Dludla, P.V. Expression of Caspase-3 in Circulating Innate Lymphoid Cells Subtypes Is Altered by Treatment with Metformin and Fluvastatin in High-Fat Diet Fed C57BL/6 Mice. Cells 2022, 11, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Liu, H.; Jing, X.; Yu, L.; Jiang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Peng, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, H.; Li, R.; Tang, H. Metformin alleviates inflammatory responses in acute allergic asthma by inhibiting ILC2s function. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 159, 114897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Mah, A.Y.; Cooper, M.A. Metabolic Regulation of Natural Killer Cell IFN-γ Production. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 36, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Lin, X.; Fu, X.; An, Y.; Zou, Y.; Wang, J.-X.; Wang, Z.; Yu, T. Lactate metabolism in human health and disease. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 305, Correction in Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01206-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Corcoran, S.E.; O’neill, L.A. HIF1α and metabolic reprogramming in inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3699–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, T.; Liu, H.; Lian, G.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, C. HIF1α-Induced Glycolysis Metabolism Is Essential to the Activation of Inflammatory Macrophages. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 9029327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Krawczyk, C.M.; Holowka, T.; Sun, J.; Blagih, J.; Amiel, E.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Cross, J.R.; Jung, E.; Thompson, C.B.; Jones, R.G.; et al. Toll-like receptor–induced changes in glycolytic metabolism regulate dendritic cell activation. Blood 2010, 115, 4742–4749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sim, W.J.; Ahl, P.J.; Connolly, J.E. Metabolism Is Central to Tolerogenic Dendritic Cell Function. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 2636701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Lawless, S.J.; Kedia-Mehta, N.; Walls, J.F.; McGarrigle, R.; Convery, O.; Sinclair, L.V.; Navarro, M.N.; Murray, J.; Finlay, D.K. Glucose represses dendritic cell-induced T cell responses. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Kumar, S.; Dikshit, M. Metabolic Insight of Neutrophils in Health and Disease. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Awasthi, D.; Nagarkoti, S.; Sadaf, S.; Chandra, T.; Kumar, S.; Dikshit, M. Glycolysis dependent lactate formation in neutrophils: A metabolic link between NOX-dependent and independent NETosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 165542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Keating, S.E.; Zaiatz-Bittencourt, V.; Loftus, R.M.; Keane, C.; Brennan, K.; Finlay, D.K.; Gardiner, C.M. Metabolic Reprogramming Supports IFN-γ Production by CD56bright NK Cells. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 2552–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Foretz, M.; Hébrard, S.; Leclerc, J.; Zarrinpashneh, E.; Soty, M.; Mithieux, G.; Sakamoto, K.; Andreelli, F.; Viollet, B. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice independently of the LKB1/AMPK pathway via a decrease in hepatic energy state. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 2355–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Moonira, T.; Chachra, S.S.; Ford, B.E.; Marin, S.; Alshawi, A.; Adam-Primus, N.S.; Arden, C.; Al-Oanzi, Z.H.; Foretz, M.; Viollet, B.; et al. Metformin lowers glucose 6-phosphate in hepatocytes by activation of glycolysis downstream of glucose phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 3330–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Morioka, K.; Nakatani, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Urakawa, H.; Kitagawa, N.; Katsuki, A.; Hori, Y.; Gabazza, E.C.; Yano, Y.; Nishioka, J.; et al. Metformin-induced suppression of glucose-6-phosphatase expression is independent of insulin signaling in rat hepatoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2005, 15, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Luizon, M.R.; Eckalbar, W.L.; Wang, Y.; Jones, S.L.; Smith, R.P.; Laurance, M.; Lin, L.; Gallins, P.J.; Etheridge, A.S.; Wright, F.; et al. Genomic Characterization of Metformin Hepatic Response. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Jafarzadeh, S.; Nemati, M.; Zandvakili, R.; Jafarzadeh, A. Modulation of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization by metformin: Implications for inflammatory diseases and malignant tumors. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 151, 114345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Shafqat, A.; Abdul Rab, S.; Ammar, O.; Al Salameh, S.; Alkhudairi, A.; Kashir, J.; Alkattan, K.; Yaqinuddin, A. Emerging role of neutrophil extracellular traps in the complications of diabetes mellitus. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 995993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Preechanukul, A.; Saiprom, N.; Rochaikun, K.; Moonmueangsan, B.; Phunpang, R.; Ottiwet, O.; Kongphrai, Y.; Wapee, S.; Janon, R.; Dunachie, S.; et al. Metabolic requirements of CD160 expressing memory-like NK cells in Gram-negative bacterial infection. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2024, 13, e1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sherratt, H.S.A. Introduction: The regulation of fatty acid oxidation in cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1994, 22, 421–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Qian, X.; Yang, Z.; Mao, E.; Chen, E. Regulation of fatty acid synthesis in immune cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 2018, 88, e12713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Chandra, P.; He, L.; Zimmerman, M.; Yang, G.; Köster, S.; Ouimet, M.; Wang, H.; Moore, K.J.; Dartois, V.; Schilling, J.D.; et al. Inhibition of Fatty Acid Oxidation Promotes Macrophage Control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mBio 2020, 11, e01139-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Seo, H.; Cho, Y.-C.; Ju, A.; Lee, S.; Park, B.C.; Park, S.G.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, K.; Cho, S. Dual-specificity phosphatase 5 acts as an anti-inflammatory regulator by inhibiting the ERK and NF-κB signaling pathways. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Luo, J.; Tian, Z.; Song, F.; Ren, C.; Liu, W. Dual-specificity phosphatase 5-mediated fatty acid oxidation promotes Mycobacterium bovis BCG -induced inflammatory responses. Exp. Cell Res. 2024, 434, 113869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Adamik, J.; Munson, P.V.; Hartmann, F.J.; Combes, A.J.; Pierre, P.; Krummel, M.F.; Bendall, S.C.; Argüello, R.J.; Butterfield, L.H. Distinct metabolic states guide maturation of inflammatory and tolerogenic dendritic cells. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yao, E.; Zhang, G.; Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Peng, L.; Huang, X.; Luo, X.; Ren, J.; Huang, R.; Yang, L.; et al. Immunomodulatory effect of oleoylethanolamide in dendritic cells via TRPV1/AMPK activation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 18392–18407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Cubillos-Ruiz, J.R.; Silberman, P.C.; Rutkowski, M.R.; Chopra, S.; Perales-Puchalt, A.; Song, M.; Zhang, S.; Bettigole, S.E.; Gupta, D.; Holcomb, K.; et al. ER Stress Sensor XBP1 Controls Anti-tumor Immunity by Disrupting Dendritic Cell Homeostasis. Cell 2015, 161, 1527–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Riffelmacher, T.; Clarke, A.; Richter, F.C.; Stranks, A.; Pandey, S.; Danielli, S.; Hublitz, P.; Yu, Z.; Johnson, E.; Schwerd, T.; et al. Autophagy-Dependent Generation of Free Fatty Acids Is Critical for Normal Neutrophil Differentiation. Immunity 2017, 47, 466–480.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Awasthi, D.; Nagarkoti, S.; Kumar, A.; Dubey, M.; Singh, A.K.; Pathak, P.; Chandra, T.; Barthwal, M.K.; Dikshit, M. Oxidized LDL induced extracellular trap formation in human neutrophils via TLR-PKC-IRAK-MAPK and NADPH-oxidase activation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 93, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Vinolo, M.A.R.; Hatanaka, E.; Lambertucci, R.H.; Newsholme, P.; Curi, R. Effects of short chain fatty acids on effector mechanisms of neutrophils. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2009, 27, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Pelletier, A.; Stockmann, C. The Metabolic Basis of ILC Plasticity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 858051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Karagiannis, F.; Masouleh, S.K.; Wunderling, K.; Surendar, J.; Schmitt, V.; Kazakov, A.; Michla, M.; Hölzel, M.; Thiele, C.; Wilhelm, C. Lipid-Droplet Formation Drives Pathogenic Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Airway Inflammation. Immunity 2020, 52, 620–634.e6, Erratum in Immunity 2020, 52, 885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Galle-Treger, L.; Hurrell, B.P.; Lewis, G.; Howard, E.; Jahani, P.S.; Banie, H.; Razani, B.; Soroosh, P.; Akbari, O. Autophagy is critical for group 2 innate lymphoid cell metabolic homeostasis and effector function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 502–517.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Gardiner, C.M.; Finlay, D.K. What Fuels Natural Killers? Metabolism and NK Cell Responses. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Szymczak-Pajor, I.; Wenclewska, S.; Śliwińska, A. Metabolic Action of Metformin. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhang, L.; Lu, Q.; Chang, C. Epigenetics in Health and Disease. In Epigenetics in Allergy and Autoimmunity; Chang, C., Lu, Q., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  147. García-Calzón, S.; Perfilyev, A.; Männistö, V.; De Mello, V.D.; Nilsson, E.; Pihlajamäki, J.; Ling, C. Diabetes medication associates with DNA methylation of metformin transporter genes in the human liver. Clin. Epigenet. 2017, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Zhao, S.; Wu, J.; Zheng, F.; Tang, Q.; Yang, L.; Li, L.; Wu, W.; Hann, S.S. β-elemene inhibited expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 through activation of ERK1/2 and AMPKα signalling pathways in human lung cancer cells: The role of Sp1. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Elbere, I.; Silamikelis, I.; Ustinova, M.; Kalnina, I.; Zaharenko, L.; Peculis, R.; Konrade, I.; Ciuculete, D.M.; Zhukovsky, C.; Gudra, D.; et al. Significantly altered peripheral blood cell DNA methylation profile as a result of immediate effect of metformin use in healthy individuals. Clin. Epigenet. 2018, 10, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. García-Calzón, S.; Schrader, S.; Perfilyev, A.; Martinell, M.; Ahlqvist, E.; Ling, C. DNA methylation partially mediates antidiabetic effects of metformin on HbA1c levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2023, 202, 110807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Cuyàs, E.; Fernández-Arroyo, S.; Verdura, S.; García, R.Á.-F.; Stursa, J.; Werner, L.; Blanco-González, E.; Montes-Bayón, M.; Joven, J.; Viollet, B.; et al. Metformin regulates global DNA methylation via mitochondrial one-carbon metabolism. Oncogene 2018, 37, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Moeez, S.; Riaz, S.K.; Qaiser, T.A.; Sarfraz, J.; Naseer, A.; Haque, S. Metformin-mediated modulation of epigenetic regulators in type 2 diabetes: A study on differential expression of DNMT1, TET1, OGG1, and AID genes. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2026, 399, 4099–4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kuroda, A.; Rauch, T.A.; Todorov, I.; Ku, H.T.; Al-Abdullah, I.H.; Kandeel, F.; Mullen, Y.; Pfeifer, G.P.; Ferreri, K. Insulin Gene Expression Is Regulated by DNA Methylation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6953, Correction in PLoS ONE 2009, 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/947a8d4a-3585-4b23-ac84-b47a255a70d9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Burgio, E.; Lopomo, A.; Migliore, L. Obesity and diabetes: From genetics to epigenetics. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 42, 799–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Lim, J.; Oh, M.; Kim, W.H.; Sohn, H.; Park, S.I. AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits TGF-β-induced fibrogenic responses of hepatic stellate cells by targeting transcriptional coactivator p300. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Zhang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, M. AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Suppresses Endothelial Cell Inflammation Through Phosphorylation of Transcriptional Coactivator p300. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 2897–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Shi, Y.; Lan, F.; Matson, C.; Mulligan, P.; Whetstine, J.R.; Cole, P.A.; Casero, R.A.; Shi, Y. Histone Demethylation Mediated by the Nuclear Amine Oxidase Homolog LSD1. Cell 2004, 119, 941–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Dhang, S.; Mondal, A.; Das, C.; Roy, S. Metformin inhibits the histone methyltransferase CARM1 and attenuates H3 histone methylation during gluconeogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2025, 301, 108271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Wu, Y.; Xu, X.; Tong, Y.; Wang, M.; Ge, F.; Wu, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Yu, X.; Li, S. Metformin Impairs Breast Cancer Growth through the Inhibition of PRMT6. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e08525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Xu, T.; Wu, X.; Lu, X.; Liang, Y.; Mao, Y.; Loor, J.J.; Yang, Z. Metformin activated AMPK signaling contributes to the alleviation of LPS-induced inflammatory responses in bovine mammary epithelial cells. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Chen, Y.-C.; Kuo, C.-H.; Tsai, Y.-M.; Lin, Y.-C.; Hsiao, H.-P.; Chen, B.-H.; Chen, Y.-T.; Wang, S.-L.; Hung, C.-H. Suppressive effects of metformin on T-helper 1-related chemokines expression in the human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1. Endocr. Res. 2018, 43, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Huang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, J.; Hao, Z.; He, Y.; Wu, Z.; Song, Y.; Yuan, K.; Zheng, S.; Zhao, Q.; et al. lncRNA MALAT1 participates in metformin inhibiting the proliferation of breast cancer cell. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 7135–7145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Noren Hooten, N.; Martin-Montalvo, A.; Dluzen, D.F.; Zhang, Y.; Bernier, M.; Zonderman, A.B.; Becker, K.G.; Gorospe, M.; Cabo, R.; Evans, M.K. Metformin-mediated increase in DICER1 regulates microRNA expression and cellular senescence. Aging Cell 2016, 15, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Giordo, R.; Posadino, A.M.; Mangoni, A.A.; Pintus, G. Metformin-mediated epigenetic modifications in diabetes and associated conditions: Biological and clinical relevance. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2023, 215, 115732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Bridgeman, S.C.; Ellison, G.C.; Melton, P.E.; Newsholme, P.; Mamotte, C.D.S. Epigenetic effects of metformin: From molecular mechanisms to clinical implications. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Cuyàs, E.; Verdura, S.; Martin-Castillo, B.; Menendez, J.A. Metformin: Targeting the Metabolo-Epigenetic Link in Cancer Biology. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 620641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Wheaton, W.W.; Weinberg, S.E.; Hamanaka, R.B.; Soberanes, S.; Sullivan, L.B.; Anso, E.; Glasauer, A.; Dufour, E.; Mutlu, G.M.; Budigner, G.S.; et al. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I of cancer cells to reduce tumorigenesis. eLife 2014, 3, e02242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  168. Cameron, A.R.; Morrison, V.L.; Levin, D.; Mohan, M.; Forteath, C.; Beall, C.; McNeilly, A.D.; Balfour, D.J.; Savinko, T.; Wong, A.K.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Metformin Irrespective of Diabetes Status. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 652–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Strugaru, A.M.; Botnariu, G.; Agoroaei, L.; Grigoriu, I.-C.; Butnaru, E. Metformin induced lactic acidosis—Particularities and course. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi 2013, 117, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  170. Ma, T.; Tian, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Yang, C.; Wu, J.; Wei, X.; Qu, Q.; Yu, Y.; et al. Low-dose metformin targets the lysosomal AMPK pathway through PEN2. Nature 2022, 603, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Madiraju, A.K.; Erion, D.M.; Rahimi, Y.; Zhang, X.-M.; Braddock, D.T.; Albright, R.A.; Prigaro, B.J.; Wood, J.L.; Bhanot, S.; MacDonald, M.J.; et al. Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis by inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature 2014, 510, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Dou, Y.; Zheng, J.; Kang, J.; Wang, L.; Huang, D.; Liu, Y.; He, C.; Lin, C.; Lu, C.; Wu, D.; et al. Mesoporous manganese nanocarrier target delivery metformin for the co-activation STING pathway to overcome immunotherapy resistance. iScience 2024, 27, 110150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Shu, Y.; Sheardown, S.A.; Brown, C.; Owen, R.P.; Zhang, S.; Castro, R.A.; Ianculescu, A.G.; Yue, L.; Lo, J.C.; Burchard, E.G.; et al. Effect of genetic variation in the organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) on metformin action. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 1422–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of metformin on macrophages. Metformin activates AMPK, suppresses mitochondrial complex I, and modulates NF-κB, JNK, STAT3, Sirt1, and NLRP3 signaling. It represses glycolysis and pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β) release in M1 macrophages while enhancing fatty acid oxidation and JAK-STAT activation in M2 macrophages. This shifts macrophage polarization from M1 to M2, mediating anti-inflammatory and metabolic regulation. “T” represents inhibition or blockade, and “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Figure 1. Effects of metformin on macrophages. Metformin activates AMPK, suppresses mitochondrial complex I, and modulates NF-κB, JNK, STAT3, Sirt1, and NLRP3 signaling. It represses glycolysis and pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β) release in M1 macrophages while enhancing fatty acid oxidation and JAK-STAT activation in M2 macrophages. This shifts macrophage polarization from M1 to M2, mediating anti-inflammatory and metabolic regulation. “T” represents inhibition or blockade, and “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Cimb 48 00642 g001
Figure 2. Effects of metformin on dendritic cells. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I in dendritic cells and modulates expression of MHC-II and CD80/CD86. It elevates ICOSL and PD-L1. These changes remodel dendritic cell activation and maturation, boost Treg differentiation, and enhance immune tolerance. “T” represents inhibition or blockade, and “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Figure 2. Effects of metformin on dendritic cells. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I in dendritic cells and modulates expression of MHC-II and CD80/CD86. It elevates ICOSL and PD-L1. These changes remodel dendritic cell activation and maturation, boost Treg differentiation, and enhance immune tolerance. “T” represents inhibition or blockade, and “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Cimb 48 00642 g002
Figure 3. Effects of metformin on neutrophils. Metformin inhibits neutrophil pro-inflammatory activities and NET release, promotes NETs clearance, and mitigates inflammation-associated tissue damage. “T” represents inhibition or blockade, and “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Figure 3. Effects of metformin on neutrophils. Metformin inhibits neutrophil pro-inflammatory activities and NET release, promotes NETs clearance, and mitigates inflammation-associated tissue damage. “T” represents inhibition or blockade, and “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Cimb 48 00642 g003
Figure 4. Effects of metformin on natural killer cells. Metformin enhances the cytotoxic activity of NK cells (by upregulating NKp46, FasL, and IFN-γ) and inhibits PD-L1 expression; simultaneously, by activating AMPK, it promotes the expansion of ILC2s, thereby exerting a dual effect of enhancing anti-tumor immunity and regulating inflammatory homeostasis. “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Figure 4. Effects of metformin on natural killer cells. Metformin enhances the cytotoxic activity of NK cells (by upregulating NKp46, FasL, and IFN-γ) and inhibits PD-L1 expression; simultaneously, by activating AMPK, it promotes the expansion of ILC2s, thereby exerting a dual effect of enhancing anti-tumor immunity and regulating inflammatory homeostasis. “+” indicates promotion or activation.
Cimb 48 00642 g004
Table 1. Comparison of preclinical and clinical evidence for metformin’s immunomodulatory effects.
Table 1. Comparison of preclinical and clinical evidence for metformin’s immunomodulatory effects.
Immune CellPrimary FunctionsRegulatory MechanismsResearch ModelsResearch LimitationsReferences
MacrophagesRegulate polarization to balance inflammation and tissue repair; remodel tumor immune microenvironment and modulate mesenchymal stem cellsActivate AMPK; reprogram metabolism, eliminate ROS, and inhibit NF-κB; regulate gut microbiota; involve AMPK/PGC-1α/PPARγ, TLR4/NF-κB, and AMPK-STAT3/JNK1 cascadesIn vitro cell models, animal modelsContext-dependent effects; supraphysiological doses widely used in vitro; most data from preclinical studies[35,36,37,44,45,46,47,48,49,54,55,56,57]
DCsControl maturation/activation to balance immunity and tolerance; suppress plasmacytoid DCs with heterogeneous effects on conventional DC subsetsAMPK-driven immunometabolic remodeling; inhibit mitochondrial complex I; modulate gut microbial metabolitesIn vitro cell models, animal models, and clinical studiesEffects vary with context and DC subtypes; most research stays at the preclinical stage[73,74,75,77,78,79]
NeutrophilsAlleviate excessive inflammation and tissue damage; block infiltration, proinflammatory cytokines, and NET formation; enhance efferocytosis and anti-tumor immunityTarget AMPK; reshape metabolism to correct abnormal glycolysis/oxidative metabolism; maintain intestinal microbiota homeostasisIn vitro cell models, animal models, and clinical observational studies on cancer patientsContext-dependent efficacy; evidence mainly derived from preclinical experiments[87,93,94,95]
NK cells/ILCsBalance immune surveillance and inflammatory homeostasis; improve NK cytotoxicity and intratumoral infiltration; preserve ILC1/ILC3 survival and optimize ILC functionsActivate AMPK to coordinate glycolysis and OXPHOS; modulate miRNAs and mTOR/pSTAT1In vitro cell models, animal models, and clinical trials on cancer patientsDivergent responses among ILC subsets; incomplete mechanistic elucidation; dominated by preclinical evidence[103,104,105,106,108,109,110]
Table 2. Potential clinical applications of metformin in innate immunity modulation.
Table 2. Potential clinical applications of metformin in innate immunity modulation.
Indication CategoryType of EvidenceReferences
Type 2 diabetes mellitusLarge-scale clinical cohorts and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)[65,66]
Adjuvant tumor therapy and cancer chemopreventionSmall-sample clinical trials and retrospective cohort studies[62,65,96,111]
Metabolic syndrome and obesity-associated chronic low-grade inflammationClinical observational studies[64]
Prevention of atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular eventsClinical observation in patients with diabetes complicated by atherosclerosis; in vivo rat models of myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis plus vascular cellular experiments[33,52,53,63,89]
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)In vivo experiments in mouse NAFLD models and in vitro cellular assays[54,55,56,57]
Multiple solid malignancies (lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer)Tumor-bearing mouse models, tumor cell assays, and immune cell experiments[36,92,93,103,107,108]
Allergic asthma and airway hyperresponsivenessMouse models of allergic airway inflammation[110]
Autoimmune diseasesIn vivo animal models of autoimmune diseases combined with immune cell assays[73,79,90]
Multiple organ injury and tissue repair (lung, nerve, bone, and cutaneous wound)Injury models in neonatal mice and rats plus cellular experiments[35,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,89,90,91]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, Y.; Xia, S. Metformin as an Innate Immune Modulator: Metabolic and Epigenetic Reprogramming of Innate Immune Cells and Therapeutic Implications. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060642

AMA Style

Shi Y, Xia S. Metformin as an Innate Immune Modulator: Metabolic and Epigenetic Reprogramming of Innate Immune Cells and Therapeutic Implications. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2026; 48(6):642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Yunfeng, and Sheng Xia. 2026. "Metformin as an Innate Immune Modulator: Metabolic and Epigenetic Reprogramming of Innate Immune Cells and Therapeutic Implications" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 48, no. 6: 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060642

APA Style

Shi, Y., & Xia, S. (2026). Metformin as an Innate Immune Modulator: Metabolic and Epigenetic Reprogramming of Innate Immune Cells and Therapeutic Implications. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 48(6), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48060642

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop