Next Article in Journal
Genotype-Specific Rhizosphere Microbiome Assembly Mediates Biochar-Induced Salt Tolerance in Sorghum
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of Atypical Hepatitis B Serological Profiles in HBsAg-Negative Women of Childbearing Age in Gabon
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genes and Gene Functions Associated with Morphological, Productive, Reproductive, and Carcass Quality Traits in Pigs: A Functional Bioinformatics Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

1
Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(2), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020185
Submission received: 26 January 2026 / Accepted: 4 February 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology)
Modern sequencing and high-throughput profiling technologies [1,2] have generated an unprecedented volume of omics data, including single-cell RNA sequencing, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and integrated multi-omics measurements. These data enable the systematic investigation of cellular systems at unprecedented resolution, facilitating quantitative characterization of cellular heterogeneity and offering transformative opportunities to deepen our understanding of complex biological processes [3], reconstruct cell type-specific genetic networks [4], elucidate disease mechanisms [5], and accelerate the development of personalized and precision medicine [6].
Despite these opportunities, the scale, complexity, and heterogeneity of modern omics datasets present substantial analytical and computational challenges. Single-cell and multi-omics data are typically high dimensional, sparse, and noisy, with pervasive missing values [7], which limit the effectiveness of traditional statistical and computational approaches. Moreover, the integration of heterogeneous data across multiple modalities and experimental conditions further complicates downstream analysis and biological interpretation. Key open challenges include accurate missing-value imputation [8,9], reliable disease biomarker discovery [10], microbial taxonomy profiling [11], integration of heterogeneous data across multiple omics modalities [12], as well as trajectory inference [13,14] and cell-fate modeling [15], spatial and temporal pattern analysis of brain activity and data [16], time-varying network modeling, and the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks [17] that capture dynamic and context-specific cellular behavior. Addressing these challenges requires the development of robust, scalable, and interpretable computational methods that integrate advanced statistical modeling, machine learning, bioinformatics and computational biology approaches to fully leverage the rich information embedded in modern omics data.
Over the past year, bioinformatics and computational biology have witnessed significant advances, with a wide range of new methods [18,19,20] developed to address some longstanding challenges. These advances have been driven by rapid progress in artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning–based generative models [21,22], data science, and emerging quantum computing approaches [23], in combination with classical computational methods, to extract meaningful biological insights from high-dimensional, heterogeneous, and multimodal molecular data. This Special Issue of Current Issues in Molecular Biology, entitled “Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology,” presents a diverse collection of studies highlighting recent methodological developments, innovative algorithms, scalable analytical frameworks, and impactful applications at the forefront of bioinformatics and computational biology. Collectively, these contributions tackle critical computational challenges posed by modern omics data and highlight how emerging computational techniques are driving new advances in biological discovery, disease understanding, and the translation of data-driven insights into biomedical applications.
Riera Aroche et al. [24] develops a quantum electrodynamic framework for DNA transcription, modeling DNA as a system of nonlinear quantum circuits within the transcription condensate architecture and characterizing transcription dynamics through Hamiltonian formulations from quantum physics. By representing DNA base pairs as anharmonic qubits analogous to radio-frequency superconducting quantum interference devices (RF-SQUIDs) coupled to cavity modes. This study provides a novel physical–mathematical perspective on quantum information processing in DNA.
Wang et al. [25] introduces f-DyGRN, a novel f-divergence–based framework for dynamic gene regulatory network inference from time-series single-cell RNA-seq data. By integrating first-order Granger causality, regularization techniques, partial correlation analysis, and a moving window strategy, the method captures temporal variations in gene interactions across different developmental stages. Applications to simulated and real THP-1 scRNA-seq datasets demonstrate that f-DyGRN outperforms existing approaches in reconstructing dynamic regulatory networks.
Peng et al. [26] proposes MvAl-MFP, a multi-label active learning framework that leverages multi-view feature representations of peptide sequences to reduce labeling costs while maintaining high predictive performance. By integrating multiple peptide feature views with a query-by-committee strategy based on prediction entropy, the method iteratively selects the most informative unlabeled samples for experimental annotation.
Wu et al. [27] systematically analyzes 34 ICD-related regulatory genes across 33 tumor types, evaluating their expression, genetic and epigenetic alterations, and associations with patient survival. Machine learning–based prognostic models revealed some key biomarkers that mediate tumor–immune interactions. The findings provide a comprehensive view of ICD-related genes and highlight potential targets for predicting immunotherapy response and improving clinical outcomes.
Kim et al. [28] introduces PixelCut, an automated framework for predicting trim positions in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing reads without requiring hyperparameters or prior biological information. By analyzing per-base quality reports from FastQC and applying computer vision–based character recognition, PixelCut accurately identifies low-quality bases for trimming and is accessible via a user-friendly web application or command-line interface.
Xu et al. [29] identifies potential therapeutic targets of dihydromyricetin (DHM) in hepatocellular carcinoma and developed a three-gene prognostic model (DTYMK, MAPT, UCK2) to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups. High-risk patients exhibited shorter overall survival, more advanced tumor stages, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by elevated TIDE scores and increased Treg infiltration. These findings provide a foundation for exploring DHM as a natural adjuvant in individualized cancer immunotherapy.
Hernandez-Montiel et al. [30] systematically analyzes genes associated with economically important traits in domestic pigs by compiling data from 116 studies published between 2000 and 2024 and performing de novo functional bioinformatics analyses. Their studies provide an integrated functional framework to support more effective marker-assisted selection strategies in pig breeding programs.
Together, these studies illustrate how advanced computational and machine learning methods can decode complex biological systems from high-dimensional molecular data. They highlight applications ranging from dynamic gene network inference and peptide function prediction to immunotherapy biomarkers and automated sequencing analysis. Collectively, these works emphasize the power of integrative computational approaches to guide therapeutic strategies and advance personalized medicine.
We sincerely thank the authors for their valuable contributions to this Special Issue, and the reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive evaluations. This Special Issue aims to provide a timely and informative resource for researchers in bioinformatics, computational biology, and related fields. We hope that the collective insights presented here will inspire further innovation and foster continued advances in bioinformatics and computational biology.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R15GM148915 (H.G.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Potter, S.S. Single-cell RNA sequencing for the study of development, physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018, 14, 479–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Loman, N.J.; Misra, R.V.; Dallman, T.J.; Constantinidou, C.; Gharbia, S.E.; Wain, J.; Pallen, M.J. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Maizels, R.J. A dynamical perspective: Moving towards mechanism in single-cell transcriptomics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2024, 379, 20230049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ding, J.; Sharon, N.; Bar-Joseph, Z. Temporal modelling using single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bar-Joseph, Z.; Gitter, A.; Simon, I. Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 552–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wagner, A.; Regev, A.; Yosef, N. Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 1145–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kharchenko, P.V.; Silberstein, L.; Scadden, D.T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 740–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bishop, G.; Si, T.; Luebbert, I.; Al-Hammadi, N.; Gong, H. tBN-CSDI: A time-varying blue noise-based diffusion model for time-series imputation. Bioinform. Adv. 2025, 5, vbaf225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, Y.; Cai, X.; ZHANG, Y.; Xu, J.; Yuan, X. Multivariate Time Series Imputation with Generative Adversarial Networks. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3–8 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dar, M.A.; Arafah, A.; Bhat, K.A.; Khan, A.; Khan, M.S.; Ali, A.; Ahmad, S.M.; Rashid, S.M.; Rehman, M.U. Multiomics technologies: Role in disease biomarker discoveries and therapeutics. Briefings Funct. Genom. 2023, 22, 76–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Woodcroft, B.J.; Aroney, S.T.; Zhao, R.; Cunningham, M.; Mitchell, J.A.; Nurdiansyah, R.; Blackall, L.; Tyson, G.W. Comprehensive taxonomic identification of microbial species in metagenomic data using SingleM and Sandpiper. Nat. Biotechnol. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baião, A.R.; Cai, Z.; Poulos, R.C.; Robinson, P.J.; Reddel, R.R.; Zhong, Q.; Vinga, S.; Gonçalves, E. A technical review of multi-omics data integration methods: From classical statistical to deep generative approaches. Briefings Bioinform. 2025, 26, bbaf355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Trapnell, C.; Cacchiarelli, D.; Grimsby, J.; Pokharel, P.; Li, S.; Morse, M.; Lennon, N.J.; Livak, K.J.; Mikkelsen, T.S.; Rinn, J.L. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Street, K.; Risso, D.; Fletcher, R.B.; Das, D.; Ngai, J.; Yosef, N.; Purdom, E.; Dudoit, S. Slingshot: Cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Boer, R.J.; Yates, A.J. Modeling T cell fate. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2023, 41, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Townsend, R.G.; Gong, P. Detection and analysis of spatiotemporal patterns in brain activity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2018, 14, e1006643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, D.; Tran, A.; Kim, H.J.; Lin, Y.; Yang, J.Y.H.; Yang, P. Gene regulatory network reconstruction: Harnessing the power of single-cell multi-omic data. npj Syst. Biol. Appl. 2023, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Papili Gao, N.; Ud-Dean, S.M.; Gandrillon, O.; Gunawan, R. SINCERITIES: Inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, Q.; Ruffalo, M.; Bar-Joseph, Z. Using single cell atlas data to reconstruct regulatory networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zeng, Y.; He, Y.; Zheng, R.; Li, M. Inferring single-cell gene regulatory network by non-redundant mutual information. Briefings Bioinform. 2023, 24, bbad326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ho, J.; Jain, A.; Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2020, 33, 6840–6851. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon, J.; Jordon, J.; Schaar, M. Gain: Missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning; PMLR: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 5689–5698. [Google Scholar]
  23. Roman-Vicharra, C.; Cai, J.J. Quantum gene regulatory networks. npj Quantum Inf. 2023, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Riera Aroche, R.; Ortiz García, Y.M.; Sánchez Moreno, E.C.; Enriquez Cervantes, J.S.; Machado Sulbaran, A.C.; Riera Leal, A. DNA Gene’s Basic Structure as a Nonperturbative Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics: Is RNA Polymerase II the Quantum Bus of Transcription? Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 12152–12173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Si, T.; Roberts, S.; Wang, Y.; Gong, H. Reconstructing Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks Using f-Divergence from Time-Series scRNA-Seq Data. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Peng, Y.; Duan, J.; Dan, Y.; Yu, H. MvAl-MFP: A Multi-Label Classification Method on the Functions of Peptides with Multi-View Active Learning. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, L.; Sun, Q.; Kitani, A.; Zhou, X.; Mao, L.; Sang, M. Constructing a Pan-Cancer Prognostic Model via Machine Learning Based on Immunogenic Cell Death Genes and Identifying NT5E as a Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, D.; Kim, W.J.; Woo, H.M.; Jeong, H. PixelCut: A Unified Solution for Zero-Configuration 16S rRNA Trimming via Computer Vision. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, Y.; Gu, C.; Li, W.; Lan, F.; Mao, J.; Tan, X.; Li, P. Dihydromyricetin Remodels the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hernández-Montiel, W.; Meza-Villalvazo, V.M.; Dzib-Cauich, D.A.; Zaldívar-Cruz, J.M.; Abad-Zavaleta, J.; Cob-Calan, N.N.; Valenzuela-Jiménez, N.; Zamora-Bustillos, R.; Osorio-Terán, A.I. Genes and Gene Functions Associated with Morphological, Productive, Reproductive, and Carcass Quality Traits in Pigs: A Functional Bioinformatics Approach. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Si, T.; Gong, H. Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020185

AMA Style

Si T, Gong H. Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2026; 48(2):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Si, Tong, and Haijun Gong. 2026. "Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 48, no. 2: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020185

APA Style

Si, T., & Gong, H. (2026). Challenges and Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 48(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020185

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop