Next Article in Journal
Gut–Adipose Tissue Axis and Metabolic Health
Next Article in Special Issue
NAC Gene Family in Lagerstroemia indica: Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, Expression Analysis, and Key Regulators Involved in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Epigenetic Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk in Frail Patients—A Scope Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Progress in Transcriptomics and Metabolomics in Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 47
Issue 6
10.3390/cimb47060423
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Invertases in the Salicaceae with the Identification of Genes Involved in Catkin Fiber Initiation and Development

by
Hui Wang
1,2,
Qianhua Tang
1,2,
Jinyan Mao
1,2,
Chang Jia
1,2,
Zilu Qin
1,2,
Yiqun Chen
1,2,
Qingqing Liang
1,2,
Xiaogang Dai
1,2,
Yingnan Chen
1,2,
Tongming Yin
1,2 and
Huaitong Wu
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Educational Department of China, Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Silvicultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(6), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47060423
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 2 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Breeding and Genetics Research in Plants, 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Invertase (INV) irreversibly converts sucrose to glucose and fructose during processes such as differentiation and organ development in plants, especially during the development of trichomes. Systematic identification and analysis of INVs in Salicaceae remain limited. Here, INV genes in Populus deltoides and Salix suchowensis were investigated, and their chromosomal localization, collinearity, gene structures, cis-regulatory elements, and phylogenetic relationships were comprehensively analyzed. Twenty and seventeen INVs were found, respectively, in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis, most of which were derived from a common ancestor and exhibited similar chromosomal distribution and high collinearity. Orthologs between the two species showed conservation of gene structures and promoter regulatory elements. Multi-species phylogenetic analysis identified an evolutionary clade associated with seed fiber development in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis. Further evaluation of INV expression in female catkins at various stages of seed fiber formation verified the predominance of PdeVINV1, PdeVINV2, PdeVINV3, and PdeVINV4 in P. deltoides, as well as SsuVINV1 and SsuVINV2 in S. suchowensis, during critical phases of catkin fiber differentiation. These genes are likely to have significant regulatory roles in the initiation and development of catkin fiber cells. These findings provide a reference for future functional studies of INVs.

1. Introduction

Invertases (INVs) irreversibly convert sucrose to glucose and fructose, and are associated with processes such as carbon partitioning, metabolism, nutrient allocation, yield formation, signaling, and stress resistance [1,2]. Based on their solubility, subcellular localization, and pH preferences, INVs can be divided into two subfamilies, namely acid and neutral/alkaline INVs [3]. The former are further subdivided into cell wall-localized invertases (CWINVs) and vacuolar-soluble invertases (VINVs), while the latter are found in the cytoplasm and are termed neutral invertases (NINVs) [3]. CWINVs and VINVs share biochemical and molecular characteristics [4]. For example, both possess an N-terminal NDPD/NG motif and a WECPD catalytic domain, as described by the CAZy database for glycoside hydrolase family 32 [5,6,7]. Phylogenetic evidence suggests that CWINVs in higher plants evolved from VINVs ancestral to those in both higher and lower plants [8]. In contrast to CWINVs and VINVs, NINVs exhibit distinct structural and substrate-specific characteristics [9]. NINVs harbor two strongly conserved amino acid residues, Asp188 and Glu414, and are classified under glycoside hydrolase family 100 in the CAZy database [10,11]. Consequently, despite their common ability to hydrolyze sucrose, NINVs appear to utilize a mechanism that differs from that seen in CWINVs and VINVs. Moreover, CWINV and VINV sequences show greater diversity compared with those of NINVs, and the enzymes are also expressed in a wider range of tissues than NINVs [8]. This observation is consistent with findings from both plants and mammals, where genes with wide expression patterns tend to be structurally more conserved than those with narrower or specific tissue expression [12]. Collectively, these findings indicate stronger evolutionary conservation of NINVs than CWINVs and VINVs in higher plants.
INVs play diverse roles in plants. CWINVs can regulate sucrose allocation, influencing seed formation and pollen development [13,14]. The functions of VINVs in plants focus primarily on the development of fruit, together with responses to both biotic and abiotic stressors [10,11]. NINVs are associated with plant root development and growth, the maintenance of carbon balance in organelles, and responses to environmental stimuli [15,16]. VINVs are also important in initiating fiber cell formation. For instance, it was found that knockdown of GhVIN1 in cotton blocked the formation of cotton fibers from ovule epidermal cells, likely by inhibiting genes involved in sugar pathways [17]. Other research has shown that the ability of VINVs to promote cotton fiber elongation is approximately 4–6 times that observed in roots, leaves, and stems, and remains at high levels during fiber elongation, reducing when elongation slows [18]. There are also studies showing that a VINV gene in Populus trichocarpa is indispensable for cellulose synthesis [19]. Recent research has revealed that sucrose degradation mediated by sucrose INV and sucrose synthase is critical for the development of poplar catkin fibers [20]. These findings are important in the investigation of INVs and their functions.
Populus and Salix are important tree species used in forestation and for timber in China as well as in other parts of the world, and they also have significant ecological, economic, and social value [21]. However, after pollination, female trees produce large numbers of catkin fibers that can cause allergies and other problems [22]. Catkin fibers result from the protrusion and differentiation of placental epidermal cells [23], in contrast to cotton fibers which develop from ovule epidermal cells [24], with both sharing similar differentiation and developmental processes. Previous studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have identified several genes controlling the initiation and early-stage morphogenesis of trichomes. Key regulators, including GL1, TTG, GL3, GL2, and TTG2, have been functionally characterized, demonstrating their roles in trichome initiation and developmental progression [25,26,27,28,29]. Additionally, MYB5 and MYB23 have been shown to modulate trichome elongation and branching patterns [30]. Beyond Arabidopsis, critical genes associated with fiber initiation in cotton have been identified and characterized over recent decades. The miR156 family regulates trichome distribution during floral development through binding to the promoter regions of TCL1 and TRY [31]. MIXTA/MIXTA-like transcription factors, particularly GhMYB25-like, function as master regulators of cotton fiber initiation by orchestrating epidermal cell differentiation [32]. Distinct MBW complexes have been shown to interact with auxin signaling pathways to promote fiber initiation [33]. Several poplar genes associated with catkin fiber development have recently been identified. GST and LEA protein-encoding genes facilitate early seed trichome development via ROS-mediated pathways [34]. A functional interplay between PTOSUS2 and MYB transcription factors has been shown to be crucial for seed hair fiber development in poplar [20]. Comparative analyses in hairless soybean mutants have shown reduced expression of plant-specific BURP genes, providing evidence for their conserved role in seed trichome development across species [35]. Despite these advancements, current research is focused predominantly on Arabidopsis and cotton models, with relatively limited mechanistic understanding of fiber development in wind-pollinated species such as poplar and willow. Notably, a genome-wide identification of the INV gene family in Populus trichocarpa has laid foundational insights for further exploration of catkin fiber biosynthesis [36]. In the present study, INVs in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis were investigated, analyzing their chromosomal localization, collinearity, gene structure, and phylogenetic relationships. Analysis of temporal gene expression in catkin fibers at various developmental phases led to the identification of genes controlling fiber formation. The findings provide a valuable reference for addressing public health problems caused by catkin fibers and cultivating poplar and willow varieties without catkin fibers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification and Analysis of INV Genes in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis

First, the genomic data of Populus deltoides (PRJNA598948) and Salix suchowensis (ASM1755242v1) analyzed in this study were retrieved from the NCBI database. A local database of the protein sequences within the genomes was constructed, and BLASTP was used to compare these sequences against those of Populus tomentosa, using an E-value cutoff of 0.01 [3]. Information on the INV protein domains Glyco_hydro_32N (PF00251), Glyco_hydro_32C (PF08244), and Glyco_hydro_100 (PF12899) was obtained from Pfam [37] and was used to screen for P. deltoides and S. suchowensis proteins containing the domains using HMMER 3.0 [38]. Candidate sequences obtained from both methods were merged and duplicates, incomplete sequences, or those lacking complete open reading frames (ORFs) were removed, leading to the identification of the INVs in the two species. The results were confirmed using the SMART database [18,39]. The chromosomal locations and protein lengths were determined from the BLAST-aligned sequences, and molecular weights (MWs) and theoretical isoelectric points (pIs) of the INV proteins were predicted using ProtParam [18].

2.2. Chromosomal Localization and Synteny Analysis

Using the INV IDs obtained in the previous step, information on chromosomal location in the two species was determined from their genome annotations using the “Gene Location Visualize from GTF/GFF” tool in TBtools (v1.09876), generating chromosomal distribution maps. The genome annotation and sequence files of both species were imported into the “One Step MCScanX” module in TBtools. The resulting collinearity, GFF, and ctl files were then loaded into the “Dual Synteny Plot” tool for visualization of the interspecies syntenic relationships [40] using the “Advanced Circos” module in TBtools (v1.09876). Finally, KaKs_Calculator 2.0 was utilized to compute synonymous (Ks) and nonsynonymous (Ka) substitution rates for the INV gene pairs.

2.3. Structural Characterization of INV Genes

The protein sequences of the INVs in both species were extracted using the “Fasta Extract” tool in TBtools (v1.09876) based on their respective protein files. A Newick-formatted phylogenetic tree file was generated from the protein sequences via the “One Step Build a ML Tree” module. Conserved motifs in the proteins were predicted with the “Simple MEME Wrapper” tool, resulting in a MEME.xml output file. The precise positions, numbers, and lengths of exons and introns within the predicted genes were determined. Finally, integration and visualization of the phylogenetic tree, conserved domains, and exon-intron structures were obtained using the “Gene Structure View” module in TBtools (v1.09876) with the generated tree, MEME.xml, and gene annotation files.

2.4. Phylogeny

Multiple sequence alignment of full-length INV proteins was conducted using ClustalX with default parameters. The alignment included sequences from two lower plants (Physcomitrella patens and Selaginella moellendorffii), two monocots (Oryza sativa and Zea mays), and seven dicots (Populus deltoides, Salix suchowensis, Gossypium hirsutum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, Oryza sativa, and Solanum tuberosum). The alignment was refined manually before phylogenetic tree construction [10]. A neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using MEGA 5.1 with Poisson substitutions, pairwise deletion, and 1000 bootstrap replicates [11]. Annotation and visualization were performed on the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) platform (https://itol.embl.de/upload.cgi/ accessed on 7 October 2024).

2.5. Collection and Processing of Plant Materials

The P. deltoides plant materials were collected from 15- to 20-year-old trees grown at Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China. Female catkins of Populus deltoides were collected at nine time points: 3 days (−3D), 2 days (−2D), and 1 day (−1D) before pollination; the day of pollination (0D); and 1 day (1D), 2 days (2D), 3 days (3D), 5 days (5D), and 8 days (8D) after pollination. The S. suchowensis plant materials were collected at the Baima Experimental Base in Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China. Female catkins were collected at seven time points: 2 days before pollination (−2D); the day of pollination (0D); and 2 days (2D), 3 days (3D), 5 days (5D), 8 days (8D), and 15 days (15D) after pollination. All sampling followed a randomized design with three biological replicates. The plant materials were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C for subsequent RNA extraction.

2.6. Primers, RNA Extraction, and qRT-PCR

The coding sequences (CDS) of the INV genes in the two species were determined and primers were designed using Primer Premier 5. Primer specificities were verified via agarose gel electrophoresis (Supplementary Table S1) [41]. This procedure was conducted to prepare for subsequent analysis of INV expression. Total RNA was extracted from inflorescences using a Hibind Plant RNA Plus Kit (PORABIO, Hangzhou, China) and 1 μg of RNA from each sample was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using HisyGo RT Red SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). qRT-PCR was conducted on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The 20 μL reaction mixture included 1 μL each of the forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 1 μL of cDNA (diluted five-fold), 10 μL of 2× ChamQ Blue Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), and RNase-free water to make up the volume. The reaction involved initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, followed by 40 cycles of 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. For Populus deltoides, the endogenous reference gene PtUBQ [42] was selected, while ACT7 [43] served as the reference gene for Salix suchowensis. The stable expression of these validated reference genes was utilized as the normalization benchmark. Each biological sample was analyzed in triplicate, and a cross-sample average CT value normalization strategy was rigorously implemented to ensure comparability of gene expression levels across experimental groups [44].

2.7. Analysis of INV Cis-Acting Elements

Promoter sequences (2 kb upstream of the start codon) of the INV genes were obtained from the genome files of the two species. Cis-acting regulatory elements within the promoters were analyzed using the PlantCARE database [45].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification of INV Gene Families in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis

A total of 20 INVs were identified in P. deltoides, comprising 3 cell wall invertases (PdeCWINV1–3), 4 vacuolar invertases (PdeVINV1–4), and 13 cytosolic invertases (PdeNINV1–13). In S. suchowensis, 17 INV family members were detected, including 4 cell wall invertases (SsuCWINV1–4), 2 vacuolar invertases (SsuVINV1–2), and 11 cytosolic neutral invertases (SsuNINV1–12). The fundamental features of the acidic and alkaline/neutral INVs in both species are summarized in Table 1. For the Gene IDs of P. deltoides INV gene family members, the numbers from genome annotation files were used; for the Gene IDs of S. suchowensis INV gene family members, GeneBank accession numbers were used. The acidic INVs in P. deltoides had protein lengths of 460–661 amino acids (aa), pI values between 5.15 and 7.66, and MWs between 51,001.51 and 73,385.74 Da. In S. suchowensis, the acidic INVs ranged from 513 to 642 aa, with pI values of 5.21–8.97 and MWs of 57,757.56 to 72,151.16 Da. The alkaline/neutral INVs in P. deltoides were 543–722 aa in length, with pI values of 5.1–7.82 and MWs of 62,277.55 to 81,121.68 Da, while those in S. suchowensis ranged from 137 to 713 aa, with pI values of 5.18–7.68 and MWs of 15,469.01–80,109.69 Da (Table 1). Comparative analysis revealed distinct family expansions, such as in the acidic INV family, where P. deltoides contained one fewer cell wall INV but two additional vacuolar INVs compared to S. suchowensis.
In the alkaline/neutral INV family, P. deltoides was found to possess two additional cytosolic members compared with S. suchowensis. Overall, the INV gene family in P. deltoides contained three more members than that of S. suchowensis, which may reflect accelerated evolutionary rates in S. suchowensis leading to gene loss during divergence [46]. Variations in amino acid composition, MW, and pI among the family members suggest the functional diversification of these enzymes in specific microenvironments.

3.2. Chromosomal Distribution and Identification of Gene Duplication

Nucleotide sequence alignments were performed with Tbtools (v1.09876), resulting in the mapping of the 18 P. deltoides INV genes to 12 chromosomes and the 16 S. suchowensis INV genes to 11 chromosomes (Figure 1). Two P. deltoides genes and one S. suchowensis gene could not be assigned to specific chromosomes but were localized to unassembled scaffold fragments, possibly the result of incomplete genome assemblies in these plant lineages.
The analysis revealed uneven chromosomal distributions of the INVs in both genomes. In P. deltoides, the maximum number of INV genes per chromosome was two, located on chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 13 (Figure 1A). In contrast, chromosome 6 of S. suchowensis exhibited a relatively higher concentration with three INVs (Figure 1B). Notably, both genomes showed identical numbers of INVs at homologous positions on chromosomes 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, and 19, suggesting that these genes are orthologs inherited from a common ancestor [47]. Compared to P. deltoides, S. suchowensis lacked INV genes on chromosomes 5 and 16. The overall expansion of INVs in P. deltoides may have been driven primarily by the proliferation of neutral/alkaline invertases. The expansion of this subfamily may be associated with the conspicuous absence of an active phloem-loading process in this group of perennial woody plants [48]. A key observation was the presence of a tandemly duplicated INV gene pair on chromosome 6 in both P. deltoides and S. suchowensis (Figure 1).
Homologous relationships between the two species were analyzed, identifying 13 pairs of homologous genes (Supplementary Table S2). Eleven pairs of INV genes were located in the same chromosomal positions in the two species, while two pairs were in different positions. Among them, the linear relationship of one pair of genes could not be determined as they had not yet been mapped to chromosomes (Figure 2A). The other pair of homologous genes, PdeCWINV1 and SsuCWINV1, were located on chromosome 16 of Populus deltoides and chromosome 1 of Salix suchowensis, respectively. This may be because poplars and willows originally shared a common ancestor. During evolution, they experienced a key salicinoid genome duplication event, which ultimately led to the differentiation into two major branches representing the current Populus and Salix genera [49]. Two main chromosomal rearrangements occurred during this process, with chromosome 1 of willow being a combination of poplar chromosome 16 and the lower part of chromosome 1, while willow chromosome 16 corresponds to the upper part of poplar chromosome 1 [46]. The results suggest that despite significant differences in distribution on some chromosomes, the overall distribution of INV genes was similar in the two genomes.
Duplications in gene families are driven primarily by both segmental and tandem duplications [50]. Single pairs of tandemly duplicated genes were observed in both species (PdeCWINV2 and PdeCWINV3, SsuCWINV3 and SsuCWINV4), with both pairs located on chromosome 6 (Figure 1). Nine pairs of segmentally duplicated genes involving 11 genes were identified in P. deltoides (Figure 2B), while seven pairs involving 12 genes were found in S. suchowensis (Figure 2C). The Ka/Ks values of these gene pairs were all below 1 (Supplementary Table S3), indicative of purifying selection, i.e., the removal of harmful variations in these gene pairs by natural selection during evolution. The results showed differences in the number of segmental gene duplications at the same positions in the two species, with two more duplications observed in P. deltoides. However, there were five events of segmental gene duplication at the same positions in both species, suggesting that INV genes may have undergone five duplication events in the common ancestry of poplars and willows. Following the divergence of the species, the willow genome showed markedly higher average substitution rates in the genes, together with a higher evolutionary rate. This suggests that willows have been subjected to more intense selection to remove harmful variations during evolution, resulting in the elimination of a greater number of genes. This may also be the reason why there are fewer INVs in S. suchowensis relative to P. deltoides.

3.3. Phylogenetic Relationships, Conserved Motifs, and Gene Structures of INV Genes in Populus and Salix

The two species share a common ancestor, and subsequent evolution has led to both the loss and retention of gene homologs. A phylogenetic tree based on full-length INV protein sequences of the two species was constructed, with integration of conserved motif and gene structure information to provide a comprehensive analysis of similarities and divergences in the gene family. The tree contained two major clades, with one including neutral/alkaline INVs and the other acid INVs. The latter clade was divided further into CWINVs and VINVs (Figure 3A). In the CAZy database, neutral/alkaline INVs are classified within glycoside hydrolase family 100, characterized by the presence of Glyco_hydro_100 domains, while acid INVs belong to glycoside hydrolase family 32, characterized by Glyco_hydro_32N and Glyco_hydro_32C terminal domains.
The MEME program in TBtools identified 12 distinct conserved motifs (23–50 aa in length) in the INV proteins of both species, with 50% of the motifs being 50 residues in length (Supplementary Table S4). While the compositions of the motifs did not differ significantly between the two species, substantial differences were observed between the neutral/alkaline and acid INV clades. Neutral/alkaline INVs tended to share 10 conserved motifs (Motifs 1–10), with Motifs 1–9 being clade-specific. In contrast, acid INVs contained only three highly conserved motifs (Motifs 10–12). Motif conservation is typically associated with the tissue expression and function of genes. This would suggest that CWINVs and VINVs have similar functions in biological processes. Notably, PdeNINV13 and SsuNINV11 in the neutral/alkaline clade exhibited atypical patterns, containing Motifs 5/9/7 and Motifs 5/1, respectively. Within the acid INV clade, PdeVINV4, SsuVINV1, and SsuCWINV1 lacked Motif 12 (Figure 3B).
Analysis of gene structures revealed substantial variability in exon–intron organization among the INV family members. SsuNINV2, PdeVINV3, and SsuCWINV4 exhibited the most complex structures (eight exons and seven introns), while PdeVINV1 had the simplest configuration. Statistical analysis showed that 5.4% (2/37) of INV genes contained one intron, while 91.89% (34/37) harbored more than one intron, and only 2.7% (1/37) lacked introns. Phylogenetic correlations demonstrated that most homologous gene pairs (such as PdeNINV11 and SsuNINV9) within the same clade shared similar intronic patterns. However, minor structural divergences were observed in some paralogs, such as PdeNINV9 (three introns) versus its homolog SsuNINV7 (four introns) (Figure 3C).

3.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of INV Gene Families in 11 Plant Species

A total of 223 INV proteins from 11 plant species were used to investigate the evolutionary relationships among INVs in the plant kingdom. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA5.1 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The eleven species included two lower plants (Physcomitrella patens and Selaginella moellendorffii), two monocots (Oryza sativa and Zea mays), and seven dicots (Populus deltoides, Salix suchowensis, Gossypium hirsutum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, Oryza sativa, and Solanum tuberosum) (Supplementary Table S5).
The phylogenetic tree revealed separation of the 223 INV proteins into two major groups corresponding to acid and alkaline/neutral INVs, respectively. The acid INVs formed four distinct clades (Clades I–IV), with Clades I and II belonging to the VINV subgroup, and Clades III and IV to the CWINV subgroup. Clade I included only members from the two lower plant species, while Clade II consisted solely of proteins from higher angiosperms. Notably, four VINV proteins from P. deltoides were observed in Clade II, while S. suchowensis contained only two. Clade III members were all derived from dicots, with both P. deltoides and S. suchowensis possessing two CWINV genes each. Clade IV included proteins from both monocots and dicots, with P. deltoides containing one CWINV protein and S. suchowensis two. No proteins from lower plants were observed in Clades III or IV. The alkaline/neutral invertases (NINVs) formed two separate clades, namely Clades V and VI. Clade V comprised five S. suchowensis NINVs and six P. deltoides NINVs, while Clade VI contained six S. suchowensis and seven P. deltoides NINV proteins. P. deltoides had one additional protein in each clade compared to S. suchowensis. Notably, most proteins from P. deltoides, S. suchowensis, and Gossypium hirsutum clustered within shared subclades.
An analysis of the diversification of the three types of invertases, CWINVs, VINVs, and NINVs, during their evolution from lower plants to higher plants revealed that VINVs from both lower plant types were clustered in Clade I, while VINVs from higher plants formed an independent cluster within Clade II. This suggests that VINVs may have diversified more rapidly due to specific functional adaptations during evolution, leading to significant differences in their sequences. CWINVs were not detected in lower plants, suggesting that CWINVs in higher plants may have originated from a common ancestor shared with VINVs in lower plants, and their functional differentiation may occurred as adaptations to vascular system developmental requirements. NINVs from both lower and higher plants together formed two tightly associated clades, reflecting stronger functional or structural constraints during evolution, and resulting in markedly greater conservation compared with other invertases [8]. Analyses of functional conservation have indicated that genes within the same taxon tend to have similar or identical functions, enabling prediction of the functions of related genes [51]. A previous study reported that silencing of GhVIN1 (Gene ID: GH_A12G2191) in cotton could block fiber initiation from the ovule epidermis [17]. Poplar and willow catkin fibers are similar to cotton fibers in terms of tissue origin and function, suggesting that they may share similar regulatory mechanisms. The cotton gene GhVIN1 was located in Clade II. The P. deltoides INVs in Clade II included PdeVINV1, PdeVINV2, PdeVINV3, and PdeVINV4, while the INVs in S. suchowensis were SsuVINV1 and SsuVINV2. Among them, PdeVINV3 and SsuVINV2 were found to be present in the same subclade as the cotton INV (Figure 4). It is thus speculated that these genes may be associated with the development of seed flocculent fibers.

3.5. Identification of INVs Associated with the Development of Poplar and Willow Floss

Fibers are flocculent fibers, produced by female poplars and willows after maturation of the fruit, that aid seed dispersal. Their formation results from the differentiation of placental epidermal cells. To examine the regulatory effects of INVs on catkin fibers, female inflorescences were collected at different stages and the expression of INV genes was analyzed. Consistent with previous reports [17,20], the cells producing catkin fibers began to differentiate from placental cells 1–2 days after pollination (Figure 5A,B). Therefore, the day of pollination was taken as day 0 (0D). In poplar, female inflorescences were collected at 9 time points, namely 3 days (−3D), 2 days (−2D), and 1 day (−1D) before pollination; the day of pollination (0D); and 1 day (1D), 2 days (2D), 3 days (3D), 5 days (5D), and 8 days (8D) after pollination. In willow, female inflorescences were collected at seven time points, namely 2 days before pollination (−2D); the day of pollination (0D); and 2 days (2D), 3 days (3D), 5 days (5D), 8 days (8D), and 15 days (15D) after pollination. qRT-PCR was used to analyze the expression patterns of the INVs. It was speculated that INVs, which are preferentially expressed during the initial differentiation of catkin fibers, may be key to the regulation of fiber development.
The results showed the presence of obvious flocculent fibers on the surfaces of the placental cells in female inflorescences from P. deltoides at 2D, with complete enclosure of the ovules at 8D. Similarly, obvious flocculent fibers were also apparent on the placental cell surfaces of female inflorescences from S. suchowensis at 2D, with complete enclosure of the ovules at 15D (Figure 5A,B). It is thus speculated that the critical period for the initiation of the catkin-like fibers in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis is within 0–2 days (0–2D). Analysis of gene expression showed that all INV genes were expressed during catkin fiber development. Among them, PdeVINV1, PdeVINV2, PdeVINV3, and PdeVINV4 were highly expressed in poplar at the start of fiber differentiation (0–2D), as were SsuCWINV2, SsuVINV1, and SsuVINV2 in willow (0–2D) (Figure 5C,D). These genes all belonged to the VINV subclass. The expression of these genes increased continuously during the development of catkin fibers in both species, with peak levels at the start of fiber development (0–2D), and decreased significantly upon fiber maturation. In contrast, both CWINV and NINV genes showed low overall expression throughout the catkin fiber development cycle. Although several individual genes (such as SsuCWINV2) exhibited high expression levels, there was no trend of upregulation during the critical period of catkin fiber initiation. The results suggest that VINVs are more closely involved in the initiation and development of catkin fibers compared to cell wall and cytoplasmic INVs, which is consistent with the earlier findings of Yang X et al. [20]. The phylogenetic analysis of INVs from multiple species showed that PdeVINV3 and SsuVINV2 were located on the same branch as GhVIN1 that regulates cotton fiber formation, implying that PdeVINV3 and SsuVINV2 may be key regulators of catkin fiber formation in poplar and willow, respectively. The analysis of gene expression profiles thus clarified the key roles of VINVs in the initiation and development of catkin fibers in poplar and willow.

3.6. Promoter Element Analysis

To elucidate the regulatory elements of INVs, cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of 37 INVs from the two species were analyzed. The results demonstrated that these cis-acting elements could be classified into 12 categories (Supplementary Table S6). Previous studies have indicated that phytohormone-responsive elements, including elements associated with responses to gibberellin, abscisic acid, and auxin, can induce expression of CWINV genes. The presence of these phytohormone-related regulatory elements was observed in VINVs and NINVs from both species. In contrast, elements responding to abiotic stressors, such as light and low temperature, as well as MYB-binding sites linked to drought responses, have been found to regulate the expression of most VINVs and NINVs [49]. Notably, gibberellin-responsive elements have been shown to alleviate the glucose-mediated suppression of CWINVs, thereby modulating intracellular glucose metabolism and maintaining normal cellular growth in fruit [23]. Furthermore, INV-mediated hexose signaling can act upstream of MYB transcription factors and auxin signals, serving as an essential component for fiber initiation [13].
Here, it was found that cis-acting elements involved in abscisic acid responsiveness were abundant among INVs in both poplar and willow, with 30 members harboring such elements. Conversely, elements associated with responses to wounding were the least common, identified only in PdeNINV5. A total of 17 genes contained auxin responsiveness-related elements, while 22 included MYB-binding elements and 14 exhibited MYBHv1 binding site-related elements. PdeVINV3, located in the same clade as cotton GhVIN1, was observed to contain two MYB transcription factor-associated regulatory elements and one auxin-responsive element. In contrast, SsuVINV2, while lacking MYB and auxin-responsive elements, harbored two hormone-related response elements associated with responses to abscisic acid and anaerobic induction, respectively. It is hypothesized that SsuVINV2 regulates seed fiber initiation and development through these hormone-responsive elements. Together with these three genes in the major subclass II clade, the poplar genes PdeVINV1, PdeVINV2, and PdeVINV4 were each found to possess one MYB transcription factor-associated regulatory element and one auxin-responsive element, while SsuVINV1 contained two MYB regulatory elements. Based on these findings, it is proposed that these genes regulate seed fiber initiation and development, potentially mediated by interactions with MYB transcription factors and auxin-associated pathways (Figure 6B).

4. Conclusions

This study identified 20 and 17 INVs in poplar and willow, respectively. Chromosomal distribution, gene structures, sequence conservation, and gene duplications associated with these genes were comprehensively analyzed. The results indicated that INVs in poplar and willow were inherited from a common ancestor, with several family members undergoing further species-specific evolution. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that proteins on several branches of the tree were associated with the regulation of seed fiber development. Analysis of INV expression patterns during female flower development identified PdeVINV3 and SsuVINV2 as key regulators of catkin fiber formation. These findings provide references both for further investigation into INV functions in poplar and willow and for the study of the molecular regulation of catkin fiber development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb47060423/s1.

Author Contributions

H.W. (Huaitong Wu) and T.Y. conceived and designed the experiments. H.W. (Huaitong Wu) and H.W. (Hui Wang) fine-tuned the methodology. H.W. (Hui Wang), H.W. (Huaitong Wu), Y.C. (Yingnan Chen), Q.L. and X.D. conducted the experiments, while H.W. (Hui Wang), Q.T., J.M., C.J., Z.Q. and Y.C. (Yiqun Chen) analyzed the data. H.W. (Hui Wang) drafted the manuscript, which was subsequently revised by H.W. (Huaitong Wu). H.W. (Huaitong Wu) and T.Y. (Tongming Yin) provided funding acquisition and supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32471823); the Key Research and Development Project of Jiangsu Province, China (grant number BE2021366); and the Youth Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Nanjing Forestry University (grant number CX2018008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MDPIMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
DOAJDirectory of open access journals
TLAThree-letter acronym

References

  1. Sturm, A. Invertases. Primary structures, functions, and roles in plant development and sucrose partitioning. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ruan, Y.-L.; Jin, Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Li, G.-J.; Boyer, J.S. Sugar input, metabolism, and signaling mediated by invertase: Roles in development, yield potential, and response to drought and heat. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 942–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roitsch, T.; Gonzalez, M.C. Function and regulation of plant invertases: Sweet sensations. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yao, Y.; Geng, M.T.; Wu, X.H.; Liu, J.; Li, R.M.; Hu, X.W.; Guo, J.C. Genome-wide identification, 3D modeling, expression and enzymatic activity analysis of cell wall invertase gene family from cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 7313–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ji, X.M.; Van den Ende, W.; Van Laere, A.; Cheng, S.; Bennett, J. Structure, evolution, and expression of the two invertase gene families of rice. J. Mol. Evol. 2005, 60, 615–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lammens, W.; Le Roy, K.; Schroeven, L.; Van Laere, A.; Rabijns, A.; Van den Ende, W. Structural insights into glycoside hydrolase family 32 and 68 enzymes: Functional implications. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lombard, V.; Ramulu, H.G.; Drula, E.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D490–D495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wan, H.; Wu, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Ruan, Y.L. Evolution of sucrose metabolism: The dichotomy of invertases and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Feng, J.; Qin, Q.; Huang, J. Overexpression of a loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) vacuolar invertase affects sucrose levels and growth. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2015, 123, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abbas, A.; Shah, A.N.; Shah, A.A.; Nadeem, M.A.; Alsaleh, A.; Javed, T.; Alotaibi, S.S.; Abdelsalam, N.R. Genome-wide analysis of invertase gene family, and expression profiling under abiotic stress conditions in potato. Biology 2022, 11, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Du, C.L.; Cai, C.L.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y.M.; Xie, Z.S. Identification and expression analysis of invertase family genes during grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berry development under CPPU and GA treatment. Mol. Genet Genom. 2023, 298, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Georgelis, N.; Braun, E.L.; Shaw, J.R.; Hannah, L.C. The two AGPase subunits evolve at different rates in angiosperms, yet they are equally sensitive to activity-altering amino acid changes when expressed in bacteria. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1458–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tang, G.-Q.; Lüscher, M.; Sturm, A. Antisense repression of vacuolar and cell wall invertase in transgenic carrot alters early plant development and sucrose partitioning. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jain, M.; Chourey, P.S.; Boote, K.J.; Allen, L.H.J. Short-term high temperature growth conditions during vegetative-to-reproductive phase transition irreversibly compromise cell wall invertase-mediated sucrose catalysis and microspore meiosis in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qi, X.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Mo, X.; Wu, S.; Chu, J.; Wu, P. AtCYT-INV1, a neutral invertase, is involved in osmotic stress-induced inhibition on lateral root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vargas, W.A.; Salerno, G.L. The Cinderella story of sucrose hydrolysis: Alkaline/neutral invertases, from cyanobacteria to unforeseen roles in plant cytosol and organelles. Plant Sci. 2010, 178, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, L.; Cook, A.; Patrick, J.W.; Chen, X.Y.; Ruan, Y.L. Silencing the vacuolar invertase gene GhVIN1 blocks cotton fiber initiation from the ovule epidermis, probably by suppressing a cohort of regulatory genes via sugar signaling. Plant J. 2014, 78, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, L.B.; Yao, Y.; He, H.; Qin, Y.L.; Liu, Z.J.; Liu, W.X.; Qi, Z.Q.; Yang, L.J.; Cao, Z.M.; Yang, Y. Genome-wide identification, expression, and functional analysis of the alkaline/neutral invertase gene family in pepper. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, S.; Cao, L.; Chen, D.; Chang, R.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, Y.; Liu, G.; Xu, Z. PtrVINV2 is dispensable for cellulose synthesis but essential for salt tolerance in Populus trichocarpa Torr. and Gray. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2025, 24, 1892–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, X.; Zhao, T.; Rao, P.; Yang, N.; Li, G.; Jia, L.; An, X.; Chen, Z. Morphology, sucrose metabolism and gene network reveal the molecular mechanism of seed fiber development in poplar. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hamzeh, M.; Dayanandan, S. Phylogeny of Populus (Salicaceae) based on nucleotide sequences of chloroplast TRNT-TRNF region and nuclear rDNA. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 1398–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, J.; Xia, X.F.; Xu, S.J.; Wu, J.; Peng, L.; Zhao, L. Development, structure and evolutionary significance of seed appendages in Salix matsudana (Salicaceae). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, F.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Tuskan, G.A.; Yin, T. Function and molecular mechanism of a poplar placenta limited MIXTA gene in regulating differentiation of plant epidermal cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242 Pt 2, 124743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, H.; Wang, L.; Zhao, S.; Gao, M.; Cao, J.; Hao, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhao, T.; Wang, S.; Han, J.; et al. GhLPF1 associated network is involved with cotton lint percentage regulation revealed by the integrative analysis of spatial transcriptome. Adv. Sci. 2025, 11, e2414175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koornneef, M.; Dellaert, L.W.; van der Veen, J.H. EMS and radiation induced mutation frequencies at individual loci in 21 Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Mutat. Res. 1982, 93, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Walker, A.R.; Davison, P.A.; Bolognesi-Winfield, A.C.; James, C.M.; Srinivasan, N.; Blundell, T.L.; Esch, J.J.; Marks, D.M.; Gray, J.C. The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocya-nin.biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Larkin, J.C.; Walker, J.D.; Bolognesi-Winfield, A.C.; Gray, J.G.; Walker, A.R. Allele-specific interactions between ttg and gl1 during trichome development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1999, 151, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Payne, C.T.; Zhang, F.; Lloyd, A.M. GL3 encodes a bHLH protein that regulates trichome development in Arabidopsis through interaction with GL1 and TTG1. Genetics 2000, 156, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rerie, W.G.; Feldmann, K.A.; Marks, M.D. The GLABRA2 gene encodes a homeo domain protein required for normal trichome development in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.F.; Milliken, O.N.; Pham, H.; Seyit, R.; Napoli, R.; Preston, J.; Koltunow, A.M.; Parish, R.W. The Arabidopsis MYB5 transcription factor regulates mucilage synthesis, seed coat development, and trichome morphogenesis. Plant Cell. 2009, 21, 72–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, N.; Cai, W.J.; Wang, S.; Shan, C.M.; Wang, L.J.; Chen, X.Y. Temporal control of trichome distribution by microRNA156-targeted SPL genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2010, 22, 2322–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wan, Q.; Guan, X.; Yang, N.; Wu, H.; Pan, M.; Liu, B.; Fang, L.; Yang, S.; Hu, Y.; Ye, W.; et al. Small interfering RNAs from bidirectional transcripts of GhMML3_A12 regulate cotton fiber development. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 1298–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, L.; Kartika, D.; Ruan, Y.L. Looking into ’hair tonics’ for cotton fiber initiation. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dai, S.; Chen, T.; Chong, K.; Xue, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, T. Proteomics identification of differentially expressed proteins associated with pollen germination and tube growth reveals characteristics of germinated Oryza sativa pollen. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2007, 6, 207–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hunt, M.; Kaur, N.; Stromvik, M.; Vodkin, L. Transcript profiling reveals expression differences in wild-type and glabrous soybean lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, Z.; Gao, K.; Su, X.; Rao, P.; An, X. Genome-Wide Identification of the Invertase Gene Family in Populus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, C.; Wang, G.; Wen, X.; Qu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Deng, P.; Chen, C.; Ji, W.; Zhang, H. Characteristics and expression analysis of invertase gene family in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes 2022, 14, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jin, A.; Ozawa, T.; Tajiri, K.; Obata, T.; Kondo, S.; Kinoshita, K.; Kadowaki, S.; Takahashi, K. A rapid and efficient singlecell manipulation method for screening antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells from human peripheral blood. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1088–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shen, L.B.; Qin, Y.L.; Qi, Z.Q.; Niu, Y.; Liu, Z.J.; Liu, W.X.; He, H.; Cao, Z.M.; Yang, Y. Genome-wide analysis, expression profile, and characterization of the acid invertase gene family in pepper. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of bigbiological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, C.; Yang, K.; Li, G.; Li, Y.; Gao, Z. Identification and expression analyses of invertase genes in moso bamboo reveal their potential drought stress functions. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 696300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gutierrez, L.; Mauriat, M.; Guénin, S.; Pelloux, J.; Lefebvre, J.F.; Louvet, R.; Rusterucci, C.; Moritz, T.; Guerineau, F.; Bellini, C.; et al. The lack of a systematic validation of reference genes: A serious pitfall undervalued in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008, 6, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, J.; Jia, H.; Han, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, P.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression analysis under abiotic stresses in the desert biomass willow, Salix psammophila. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative pcr and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, L.B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, M.; Wang, R.Z.; Qian, M.; Zhang, S.L. Technology, genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of the superoxide dismutase gene family in pear and their functions during fruit ripening. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 143, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dai, X.; Hu, Q.; Cai, Q.; Feng, K.; Ye, N.; Tuskan, G.A.; Milne, R.; Chen, Y.; Wan, Z.; Wang, Z.; et al. The willow genome and divergent evolution from poplar after the common genome duplication. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1274–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hou, J.; Ye, N.; Dong, Z.; Lu, M.; Li, L.; Yin, T. Major chromosomal rearrangements distinguish willow and poplar after the ancestral “Salicoid” genome duplication. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 1868–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bocock, P.N.; Morse, A.M.; Dervinis, C.; Davis, J.M. Evolution and diversity of invertase genes in Populus trichocarpa. Planta 2008, 227, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Zhen, L.; Tan, X.; Li, L.; Wang, X. The involvement of hexokinase in the coordinated regulation of glucose and gibberellin on cell wall invertase and sucrose synthesis in grape -berry. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 7899–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ahiakpa, J.K.; Magdy, M.; Karikari, B.; Munir, S.; Mumtaz, M.A.; Tamim, S.A.; Mahmood, S.; Liu, G. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of tomato invertase genes indicate their response to stress and phytohormones. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1481–1498. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00344-021-10384-5 (accessed on 15 November 2024). [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, F.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Yin, T.; Wu, H. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins (FLAs) in Salicacea and identification of secondary tissue development-related genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cimb 47 00423 g001
Figure 1. Chromosome maps of INV genes in the genomes of P. deltoides and S. suchowensis. (A) Eighteen PdeINV genes were mapped to 12 chromosomes in P. deltoides. (B) Sixteen SsuINV genes were mapped to 11 chromosomes in S. suchowensis. Genes showing tandem duplications are highlighted with red borders.
Figure 1. Chromosome maps of INV genes in the genomes of P. deltoides and S. suchowensis. (A) Eighteen PdeINV genes were mapped to 12 chromosomes in P. deltoides. (B) Sixteen SsuINV genes were mapped to 11 chromosomes in S. suchowensis. Genes showing tandem duplications are highlighted with red borders.
Cimb 47 00423 g001
Cimb 47 00423 g002
Figure 2. Collinearity analysis of INV genes. (A) Homologous relationships between P. deltoides and S. suchowensis on chromosomes. (B) Intraspecific collinear segments in P. deltoides. (C) Intraspecific collinear segments in S. suchowensis. Red lines indicate collinear INV gene pairs, and light-gray lines represent collinear segments.
Figure 2. Collinearity analysis of INV genes. (A) Homologous relationships between P. deltoides and S. suchowensis on chromosomes. (B) Intraspecific collinear segments in P. deltoides. (C) Intraspecific collinear segments in S. suchowensis. Red lines indicate collinear INV gene pairs, and light-gray lines represent collinear segments.
Cimb 47 00423 g002
Cimb 47 00423 g003
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships, conserved motifs, and gene structures of INVs in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis. (A) A phylogenetic tree constructed with 1000 replicates using the maximum-likelihood method in MEGA 5.1. (B) Conserved motifs in INV proteins. Individual motifs are represented by colored boxes, with solid black lines representing non-conserved sequences. The size and position of the motifs are shown according to the scale at the bottom of the figure. (C) Exon–intron structures of INV genes. Exons are represented in green, and introns are shown as solid black lines. The relative positions of introns and exons are shown according to the scale provided at the bottom of the figure.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships, conserved motifs, and gene structures of INVs in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis. (A) A phylogenetic tree constructed with 1000 replicates using the maximum-likelihood method in MEGA 5.1. (B) Conserved motifs in INV proteins. Individual motifs are represented by colored boxes, with solid black lines representing non-conserved sequences. The size and position of the motifs are shown according to the scale at the bottom of the figure. (C) Exon–intron structures of INV genes. Exons are represented in green, and introns are shown as solid black lines. The relative positions of introns and exons are shown according to the scale provided at the bottom of the figure.
Cimb 47 00423 g003
Cimb 47 00423 g004
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships of INVs in 11 plant species. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed in MEGA 5.1 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. All INVs were clustered into six different groups (I–Ⅵ), represented by different colors. Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ in the red area represent VINVs, Groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ in the green area are CWINVs, and Groups Ⅴ and Ⅵ in the purple area are NINVs. The 11 plant species are Physcomitrella patens, Selaginella moellendorffii, Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Populus deltoides, Salix suchowensis, Gossypium hirsutum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, Oryza sativa, and Solanum tuberosum.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships of INVs in 11 plant species. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed in MEGA 5.1 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. All INVs were clustered into six different groups (I–Ⅵ), represented by different colors. Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ in the red area represent VINVs, Groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ in the green area are CWINVs, and Groups Ⅴ and Ⅵ in the purple area are NINVs. The 11 plant species are Physcomitrella patens, Selaginella moellendorffii, Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Populus deltoides, Salix suchowensis, Gossypium hirsutum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, Oryza sativa, and Solanum tuberosum.
Cimb 47 00423 g004
Cimb 47 00423 g005
Figure 5. Expression of INV genes in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis during seed fiber initiation and development. (A) Phenotypes of seed hairs and the development of internal seed fibers in P. deltoides at different stages. (B) Phenotypes of seed hairs and the development of internal seed fibers in S. suchowensis at different stages. Scale bar = 1 mm in both (A,B). (C) Expression of INV genes in P. deltoides. (D) Expression of INV genes in S. suchowensis. The x-axis represents different periods and the y-axis represents relative expression levels. The values shown are the mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates (p < 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Figure 5. Expression of INV genes in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis during seed fiber initiation and development. (A) Phenotypes of seed hairs and the development of internal seed fibers in P. deltoides at different stages. (B) Phenotypes of seed hairs and the development of internal seed fibers in S. suchowensis at different stages. Scale bar = 1 mm in both (A,B). (C) Expression of INV genes in P. deltoides. (D) Expression of INV genes in S. suchowensis. The x-axis represents different periods and the y-axis represents relative expression levels. The values shown are the mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates (p < 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Cimb 47 00423 g005
Cimb 47 00423 g006
Figure 6. (A) Phylogenetic relationships. (B) Cis-acting elements.
Figure 6. (A) Phylogenetic relationships. (B) Cis-acting elements.
Cimb 47 00423 g006
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the INV gene family in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the INV gene family in P. deltoides and S. suchowensis.
Gene Symbol Gene ID Chr Start End Amino Acid PIMw
PdeCWINV1EVM0014612chr165,978,2195,994,01957865,117.666.58
PdeCWINV2EVM0008374chr622,923,12122,926,71257665,562.075.15
PdeCWINV3EVM0008949chr622,919,48222,922,23757064,803.287.66
PdeVINV1EVM0021361chr315,565,34515,566,94953459,632.075.3
PdeVINV2EVM0032360chr314,483,23214,487,90466173,385.745.92
PdeVINV3EVM0005782chr1513,459,41713,463,82862670,134.855.3
PdeVINV4EVM0034321Contig0042229,26733,17846051,001.515.36
SsuCWINV1KAG5253080chr17,929,8887,932,47151357,757.568.66
SsuCWINV2KAG5243975chr615,728,18515,732,34457865,683.728.97
SsuCWINV3KAG5244133chr616,948,56116,952,25461469,846.195.7
SsuCWINV4KAG5244132chr616,945,04316,947,75254762,500.566.68
SsuVINV1KAG5249197chr38,030,0548,035,52855061,029.285.92
SsuVINV2KAG5230526chr1511,591,35611,595,29064272,151.165.21
PdeNINV1EVM0016105chr86,703,2256,707,38769277,974.796.1
PdeNINV2EVM0028453chr13472,802477,17861769,982.915.83
PdeNINV3EVM0036036chr81,215,7961,219,87366374,292.936.45
PdeNINV4EVM0037445chr1021,183,17221,187,82666674,536.126.02
PdeNINV5EVM0003860chr5773,232777,39965774,839.515.78
PdeNINV6EVM0006001chr419,121,24519,126,93061769,484.17.82
PdeNINV7EVM0018844chr524,044,12324,046,09854362,277.556.01
PdeNINV8EVM0008004chr1914,355,56014,362,11855763,338.655.92
PdeNINV9EVM0037237chr417,702,45217,705,28057365,529.256.11
PdeNINV10EVM0031867chr26,833,7296,837,87572281,121.685.1
PdeNINV11EVM0022732chr910,672,15710,674,96857465,655.415.92
PdeNINV12EVM0014961chr1312,780,57012,788,09055763,568.046.35
PdeNINV13EVM0012606Contig012141913330024527,475.095.99
SsuNINV1KAG5240243chr85,743,8695,747,37468377,291.946.14
SsuNINV2KAG5232299chr13345,772349,41064072,308.865.97
SsuNINV3KAG5239587chr81,071,8151,075,80566574,395.896.02
SsuNINV4KAG5237853chr1015,999,56416,002,83166774,351.935.87
SsuNINV5KAG5248034chr414,455,45214,460,98646752,028.755.37
SsuNINV6KAG5224657chr1913,831,15413,837,35455763,446.956.23
SsuNINV7KAG5247877chr413,017,77013,021,45057465,729.316.12
SsuNINV8KAG5251679chr213,585,13513,590,23171380,109.695.18
SsuNINV9KAG5239072chr99,074,7079,077,31657465,572.236.14
SsuNINV10KAG5233215chr1311,775,50711,781,30355763,485.936.39
SsuNINV11KAG5251679Contig0232958,95959,41713715,469.017.68
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Tang, Q.; Mao, J.; Jia, C.; Qin, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liang, Q.; Dai, X.; Chen, Y.; Yin, T.; et al. Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Invertases in the Salicaceae with the Identification of Genes Involved in Catkin Fiber Initiation and Development. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47060423

AMA Style

Wang H, Tang Q, Mao J, Jia C, Qin Z, Chen Y, Liang Q, Dai X, Chen Y, Yin T, et al. Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Invertases in the Salicaceae with the Identification of Genes Involved in Catkin Fiber Initiation and Development. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(6):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47060423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Hui, Qianhua Tang, Jinyan Mao, Chang Jia, Zilu Qin, Yiqun Chen, Qingqing Liang, Xiaogang Dai, Yingnan Chen, Tongming Yin, and et al. 2025. "Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Invertases in the Salicaceae with the Identification of Genes Involved in Catkin Fiber Initiation and Development" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 6: 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47060423

APA Style

Wang, H., Tang, Q., Mao, J., Jia, C., Qin, Z., Chen, Y., Liang, Q., Dai, X., Chen, Y., Yin, T., & Wu, H. (2025). Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Invertases in the Salicaceae with the Identification of Genes Involved in Catkin Fiber Initiation and Development. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(6), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47060423

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop