Next Article in Journal
Theranostics of Bone Metastases: The Role and Prospects of Bisphosphonate Radiopharmaceuticals
Previous Article in Journal
Guang Chenpi Extract as a Multifunctional Phytotherapeutic: Enhanced Effects with Ergothioneine and Polydeoxyribonucleotide on Redox Homeostasis and Tissue Resilience
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Marine Streptomyces-Derived Lipids Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Through In Vitro and Predicted Multi-Site Binding Mechanisms

by
Doralyn S. Dalisay
1,2,3,*,
Jomari C. Mateo
2,
Jade Joshua R. Teodosio
2,
Leighiara S. de Guzman
2,
Neaven Bon Joy M. Marcial
2,
Dion Paul C. Caspe
4,
Lex Aliko P. Balida
2 and
Jamia Azdina Jamal
1
1
Centre for Drug and Herbal Development, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
2
Center for Chemical Biology and Biotechnology, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City 5000, Philippines
3
Department of Biology, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City 5000, Philippines
4
Magnetic Resonance Facility, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City 5000, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(2), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020294
Submission received: 5 November 2025 / Revised: 9 December 2025 / Accepted: 10 December 2025 / Published: 10 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspective of Antiviral Drugs)

Abstract

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro is essential for viral replication and an attractive target for antiviral intervention. While most strategies target the catalytic site, recent studies suggest that the dimerization interface and cryptic allosteric pockets offer alternative mechanisms for inhibition. Objective: This study investigated lipid metabolites from the marine sediment-derived Streptomyces sp. DSD454T as potential multi-site 3CLpro inhibitors. Methods: Metabolites were extracted from cultured biomass and characterized using LCMS-QTOF, MS/MS (LCMS-TQ), and 1H NMR, with identities confirmed against authentic standards. 3CLpro inhibition was assessed using a FRET-based assay, and ligand–protein interactions were evaluated through molecular docking and MM/GBSA calculations. Lipid content and comparative lipidomic signatures were examined across bioactive Streptomyces strains through LCMS-TQ and BODIPYTM 493/503 staining. Results: Palmitoleic and linoleic acids were identified as major constituents and inhibited SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro with IC50 values of 1.59 µg/mL (6.25 µM) and 5.29 µg/mL (18.88 µM). Molecular docking predicted that both fatty acids bind not only to the catalytic site but also to the dimerization interface and cryptic allosteric pocket. Additional lipids, including 9-heptadecenoic acid, linolenic acid, 9-HODE, and monoacylglycerols such as aggrecerides A–C and glyceryl-based lipids, showed similarly favorable multi-site binding profiles. Streptomyces sp. DSD454T also exhibited substantial lipid accumulation (~63% of crude extract). Across bioactive Streptomyces strains, a conserved lipid signature correlated strongly with 3CLpro inhibition. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of microbial lipids as promising scaffolds for developing catalytic and allosteric SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors and underscore marine Streptomyces as a valuable source of structurally simple yet mechanistically versatile antiviral metabolites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The replication of the RNA genome plays a vital role in the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 [1,2,3]. The core of this process involves translating viral RNA into two significant polyproteins, pp1a and pp1ab. These polyproteins require proteolytic cleavage to produce functional non-structural proteins (NSPs) that facilitate viral replication [4,5,6,7]. Two viral proteases are responsible for these cleavage events: the papain-like protease (PLpro) [8,9] and the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro), also known as the main protease (Mpro) [10,11]. PLpro cleaves the N-terminal region of polyproteins, producing nsps that play a critical role in immune evasion and the initial phases of viral replication [8,12]. PLpro exhibits similarities to human deubiquitinating enzymes [8,13]. In contrast, 3CLpro cleaves at 11 different locations on the polyproteins to free the nsps necessary for creating the replication-transcription complex (RTC), which is important for viral RNA production and the formation of new virions [6,11,14]. 3CLpro is composed of three distinct domains. Domains I and II (residues 1–184) form antiparallel β-barrels with a chymotrypsin-like fold, creating a substrate-binding site between them [11,15,16]. Domain III (residues 201–303) is made up of α-helices and is connected to Domain II by a flexible hinge loop (residues Gln189-Asp197) [15,17,18]. The protease is active only in its dimeric form, with each monomer contributing a catalytic dyad composed of Cys145 and His41 [19,20]. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of Domain III in promoting dimerization and maintaining enzymatic activity, suggesting it plays a more active role than merely providing structural support [17,21,22,23]. These domains offer multiple potential targets for therapeutic intervention, underscoring 3CLpro as a crucial element in the pursuit of COVID-19 therapies [23]. The catalytic site of 3CLpro is important for its proteolytic activity and has been a major target of drug discovery efforts. Cys145 and His41, which form a catalytic dyad at this position, cleave viral polyproteins at specific points (Leu-Gln-Ser-Ala-Gly) [19,24]. These sequences are exclusive to viral proteins and are absent in human proteases [16,24]. The precise nature of the catalytic site of 3CLpro makes it a suitable target for antiviral drugs, which minimizes the chances of unintended effects in humans [19,25,26]. Although the majority of antiviral approaches have focused on the catalytic domain of 3CLpro, recent findings indicate that the dimerization interface and hidden allosteric pockets play a significant role in enzymatic regulation. However, these areas have not been thoroughly investigated as potential drug targets [25,27,28,29,30,31]. Therefore, these sites act as alternative or supplementary drug targets, expanding the possibilities for inhibitor design beyond the conventional approach of blocking the active site.
With this expanded understanding of 3CLpro architecture and the regulatory roles of its non-catalytic regions, recent efforts have increasingly focused on leveraging these structural vulnerabilities for therapeutic applications. A variety of studies have highlighted inhibitors that focus on allosteric sites and dimer interfaces, impacting 3CLpro activity without engaging the catalytic cleft. A recent investigation revealed new peptidomimetic carboxamides (Figure 1) that were originally selected for the active site but instead engage with a validated allosteric pocket. This interaction modifies the balance of proteases, promoting the monomeric form and thereby hindering 3CLpro in infected cells [32]. A recent study also explored the use of repurposed drugs like minocycline, bexarotene, ledipasvir, and simeprevir (Figure 1), which engage with an allosteric site at the dimer interface. The results, derived from structural, biophysical, and crystallographic analyses, revealed that interactions in this region cause the movement of key helices in domain III, weaken the dimer, and initiate conformational alterations in residues vital for preserving the active conformation [33]. In addition, a computational analysis strongly supports the possibilities for advancing drug development in this area. A recent study developed derivatives of benzo[b]thiophene and benzo[b]furan (Figure 1) with the intention of targeting a pocket located between domains II and III. This approach led to candidates anticipated to demonstrate dual affinity for the catalytic environment as well as the dimerization site [34]. Finally, a documented report provided an in-depth thermodynamic analysis of the dimer-monomer equilibrium, showing that fluorinated 1,2,4-oxadiazoles compounds (Figure 1) discovered via virtual screening can either destabilize or stabilize the dimer, resulting in corresponding changes in enzymatic activity [35]. All of these inhibitors are synthetic or repurposed molecules, underscoring the need to explore natural-product scaffolds as alternative sources of structural diversity capable of modulating these non-catalytic sites.
Expanding on the recent insights into the multi-site susceptibility of 3CLpro, natural products present an intriguing source of structurally varied molecules that can take advantage of these mechanistic weaknesses. Natural products have historically served as rich sources of antiviral scaffolds, many of which engage with protein targets via both standard and atypical binding mechanisms. Microbial metabolites, especially those from Streptomyces, are notable for their chemodiversity, ecological adaptability, and evolutionary refinement for biological functions [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Streptomyces derived from marine sediments live in environments that are both competitive and chemically active, which leads to the production of polyketides, non-ribosomal peptides, and other bioactive compounds [44,45,46,47]. These include lipids and lipid-related compounds can influence enzyme activity through various interactions, both catalytic and non-catalytic. In our recently published study [48], we showed that marine sediments from the Philippines are an underexplored but highly productive source of metabolites that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Using a combination of biochemical screening, metabolomics, and computational analysis, we discovered several antiviral candidate molecules sourced from marine-derived Streptomyces, which include lipid metabolites that potentially bind to multiple sites on 3CLpro.
In this study, we focused on Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, a strain previously identified as one of the most bioactive isolates in our initial screening campaign [48]. The strain was characterized through morphological, biochemical, and phylogenetic analyses, followed by metabolomic profiling and bioassay-guided fractionation to isolate active compounds. These studies established Streptomyces sp. DSD454T as a prolific producer of lipid-derived compounds. Among them, the unsaturated fatty acids palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid emerged as key bioactive constituents, each showing marked inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro in enzymatic assays. To gain insight into their mode of action, structure-based molecular docking was performed, revealing potential binding at three functionally important regions of the protease: the catalytic site, the dimerization interface, and cryptic allosteric pockets that may be susceptible to inhibition by flexible, hydrophobic molecules. Additionally, fatty acids putatively identified as 9-heptadecenoic acid, linolenic acid, and 9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acid (9-HODE), along with monoacylglycerols such as aggrecerides A-C and glyceryl-based lipids including 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl nonadeca-9,12-dienoate, glyceryl heptadecanoate, and glyceryl pentadecanoate, demonstrated favorable predicted binding affinities at both catalytic and non-catalytic regions of 3CLpro, indicating a potential multi-site mechanism of inhibition. Using metabolomics, biochemical inhibition assays, and computational modeling, we establish the antiviral potential of fatty acids and monoacylglycerols, and reveal marine sediment-derived Streptomyces as a rich yet underexplored source of lipid scaffolds targeting catalytic and allosteric sites in the coronavirus main protease for pharmaceutical development.

2. Results

2.1. Morphological and Biochemical Characterization of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T

The marine sediment-derived Streptomyces sp. DSD454T is phylogenetically identical to S. enissocaesilis (NR 115668.1) with 100% sequence identity [48]. It showed morphological characteristics of the genus Streptomyces. When grown on MM1 agar it formed colonies with wrinkled and rough surfaces. In addition, the strain also displayed concentric rings of spore chains. The variation in colony morphology, with some regions appearing smooth and others rough, may reflect different stages of growth and sporulation. Furthermore, the colonies exhibited a mixture of grey aerial and yellowish-brown substrate mycelium, with evident sporulation structures (Figure 2A) and brown diffusible pigment when grown in MM1 agar. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image at 5000× magnification revealed a complex network of densely elongated, straight, cylindrical mycelia approximately 2 µm in diameter and 10 µm in length (Figure 2B). Furthermore, strain DSD454T produced chains of cylindrical sporogenic structures, measuring approximately 1 µm in diameter and up to 15 µm in length, as shown in their collective spores (Figure 2C).
Abundant aerial and substrate mycelial development was observed on ISP3, ISP4, and ISP9 media. In contrast, cultures grown on ISP2 exhibited reduced growth, with sparse or minimal formation of aerial and substrate mycelia. Diffusible pigment formation was not detected in any of the ISP media examined (Figure 2D and Table S1). All sugars examined were metabolized by Streptomyces sp. DSD454T when provided as the sole carbon source. The colonies displayed a characteristic yellowish phenotype observed across all media tested (Figure 2E and Table S2).
Next, we examined how the strain develops colonies when different nitrogen sources are present. Poor aerial or substrate mycelium development was noted on conditions containing ammonium sulfate, urea, and peptone (Figure 2F and Table S3). Sparse aerial and substrate mycelial development was the outcome of growth on yeast extract. Cultures cultivated on casein, on the other hand, exhibited extensive aerial and substrate mycelial growth. In all of the nitrogen sources that were examined, no diffusible pigment was found.
To identify the ideal growing conditions for strain DSD454T, the impact of temperature on growth was evaluated in addition to nitrogen usage. At 4 °C, as shown in Figure 2G and Table S4, no growth took place. The ample aerial and substrate mycelia were visible at 28 °C and 37 °C. This observation suggests that these temperatures were ideal for the development of the strain. At 45 °C, a noticeable decrease in development was observed. This includes visibility of scant mycelium, and no diffusible pigment was generated at any of the tested temperatures.
In order to evaluate the strain’s tolerance to varying degrees of medium acidity or alkalinity, we next looked at how pH affected development. At pH 4, significant development was noted, as indicated in Figure 2H and Table S5. At pH 5–6, aerial and substrate mycelial development became noticeable, and it gradually improved from pH 7 to pH 10. In all measured pH range, diffuse pigment formation was not seen.
To assess salinity tolerance, the halotolerance of Streptomyces sp. strain DSD454T was evaluated in media supplemented with increasing concentrations of NaCl (0–12% w/v). At 0–5% NaCl, robust development with an abundance of aerial and substrate mycelium was seen (Figure 2I and Table S6). Although colony density and coloration were decreased, there was still substantial mycelial growth at 7% NaCl. Growth declined sharply at 10% NaCl and was abolished at 12%, while no diffusible pigment formation occurred at any of the salt concentrations examined.
Finally, enzymatic activity profiling of strain DSD454T was performed to determine its metabolic capabilities. Enzymatic assays (Table S7) showed broad activity across phosphatases, esterases, peptidases, and glycosidases, except for α-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, and α-fucosidase, which were negative.

2.2. Phylogenetic Placement of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T Based on Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

The taxonomic position of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T was inferred from a maximum-likelihood phylogeny constructed with concatenated sequences of the housekeeping genes atpD, recA, and trpB (Figure S1). The analysis included type strains of related Streptomyces species and was evaluated using bootstrap support values. According to our observations, strain DSD454T does not belong to the clade of S. vinaceusdrappus or S. rochei. Instead, it shows a tight but distinct phylogenetic connection with S. ennisocaesilis DSD012T by forming a sister lineage that is clearly separated from other members of the genus. The robustness of this phylogenetic split is highlighted by the strong bootstrap value (90%) that confirms the bifurcation between Streptomyces sp. DSD454T and S. ennisocaesilis.

2.3. Biomass Production and Bioassay-Guided Purification of DSD454T Extract for SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Inhibitors

A total of 50 L of MM1 molten agar was used to produce the biomass of strain DSD454T. Ethyl acetate extraction from this 50 L biomass yielded 4.4 g of DSD454T crude extract, which had an oily consistency. The crude extract was subjected to solid phase extraction, resulting in 3 g of methanol-soluble extract (coded as DSD454I). To further purify the DSD454I sample, preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography was performed. The eluates were pooled based on their absorbance in the range of 190 to 790 nm, producing 25 distinct fractions (H1–H25) (Figure S2). Multiple retention times showed distinct peaks, with fractions H2, H7, H18, H20, H21, and H22 exhibiting strong PDA responses. Fractions H19–H25 contained most of the DSD454I extract eluates that were between 90 and 100% MeCN. The bulk material from fractions H19–H24, which displayed an oily consistency, yielded 5.6–22.3% (Table S8). Collectively, these fractions accounted for 63% of the crude extract.
A total of 25 HPLC fractions derived from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T was evaluated for their ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro using a FRET-based enzymatic assay. All experiments were conducted in three independent trials, each performed in triplicate. Due to observed solubility issues with mid-to-late eluting fractions (H10–H25) in assay buffer containing DTT, a modified sample preparation method was adopted. Each fraction was first prepared as a 50 mg/mL stock in DMSO. For testing, 0.5 µL of this stock was diluted into 99.5 µL of assay buffer with 1 mM DTT and vortexed immediately to prevent precipitation. This modification enabled consistent and soluble delivery of these samples for enzymatic testing.
The positive control, GC376 at 50 µg/mL (green bar), achieved 96% inhibition of 3CLpro activity, confirming the assay’s validity as shown in Figure 3. In contrast, the negative control H2O (red bar) showed negligible inhibition. At 10 µg/mL, the methanol-soluble extract DSD454I completely inhibited 3CLpro activity (100%, dark blue bar). Fractions H1B–H9, tested at 100 µg/mL in 0.1% DMSO, represented the early-eluting set and showed weak inhibition (<50%, white bars). Conversely, fractions H10–H25, tested at 50 µg/mL, displayed a broader range of activities. Moderate inhibition (50–60%) was observed in fractions H11B, H13B, and H14 (yellow bars), while stronger effects (80–90%) were seen in fractions H15, H17, H18, H19, and H20 (light blue bars). The most potent inhibition (>90%) was exhibited by fractions H21, H22, H23, and H24 (dark blue bars). Conversely, fraction H25 decreased activity, with inhibition falling below 50% (indicated by the white bar) (Figure 3). Minimal inhibition occurred in early fractions, moderate activity in mid-eluting samples, and the strongest effect in late fractions, with H21–H24 consistently producing >90% inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. These findings offer a targeted basis for chemical characterization and identifying the active constituents responsible for 3CLpro inhibition.

2.4. NMR Characterization of Bioactive HPLC Fractions Revealed Lipidic Components

Stacked 1H NMR spectra are presented in Figure 4 for HPLC-purified fractions DSD454 H17 through H24, each exhibiting inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro, with inhibition values ranging from 81.62% to 94.54%. We then examined the resonance signals for consistency and distinct chemical features indicative of lipid components. The terminal methyl (-CH3) and methylene (-CH2-) groups of long-chain fatty acid moieties were noted in fractions H17 to H19, which displayed prominent resonances that appeared in the aliphatic region (δ 0.80–1.50 ppm) (Figures S3–S5).
Fractions DSD454 H20 through H24 exhibited enhanced signal intensity in the olefinic region (δ 5.20–5.50 ppm), attributable to protons on carbon-carbon double bonds within unsaturated lipid chains. These peaks were particularly observed in DSD454 H20–H24, correlating with the highest inhibitory activities observed (88.06% to 94.54%) (Figures S6–S10).
There were no aromatic lipid compounds detected, as there were minimal or absent aromatic resonances (δ 6.80–7.50 ppm) among the HPLC fractions with 3CLPro activity. We also noted that fractions H21-H24 exhibit signatures of monoacylglycerols, as indicated by the glycerol backbone signals, typically found between δ 3.40–4.40 ppm (Figures S7–S10). Collectively, the 1H NMR spectra among bioactive HPLC fractions suggest the presence of structurally related lipid compounds enriched in unsaturated aliphatic chains and likely involved in 3CLpro inhibition.

2.5. Dereplication-Guided Identification of Lipid-like Compounds in Bioactive HPLC Fractions of Streptomyces sp. DSD454I

The bioactive compounds present in four HPLC fractions (H21, H22, H23, and H24), all of which showed over 90% inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro at a concentration of 50 µg/mL, were identified to link their 3CLpro activity. We performed the dereplication strategy by analyzing the MS and MS/MS data obtained from LCMS-TQ and high-resolution LCMS-QTOF. Additionally, 1H NMR data were used to provide signature signals for compound identity and to prioritize structurally distinct compounds for additional characterization.
Due to its strong inhibitory activity and well resolved peak in the chromatogram, fraction H21 was selected for detailed analysis to initiate the dereplication process. The LCMS-TQ analysis performed at 190 nm revealed two key UV absorbance peaks that appeared between 9.5 and 10.2 min (Figure 5A). These corresponded to protonated molecular ions with m/z values of 255.25 [M+H]+ and 281.25 [M+H]+, respectively (Figure 5B and Figure 5D). These masses were subjected to validation via LCMS-QTOF in negative ion mode, yielding deprotonated ions at m/z 253.2175 [M-H] and 279.2327 [M-H] (Figures S11 and S12). Accurate mass measurements corresponded to molecular formulas C16H30O2 (double bond equivalent [DBE] = 2.0) and C18H32O2 (DBE = 3.0), within acceptable mass error limits of <5 ppm (Table 1).
MS/MS-based dereplication using the GNPS platform identified the two compounds as palmitoleic acid 1 and linoleic acid 2 based on spectral similarity. These identifications were confirmed through direct comparison with authentic standards. Overlaying the UV and chromatographic profiles confirmed that the retention times and elution behaviors matched those of the standards for palmitoleic and linoleic acid (Figure 5A). Additionally, MS/MS fragmentation spectra showed diagnostic product ions consistent with fatty acid fragmentation patterns seen in the reference compounds. Compound 1 generated prominent fragments at m/z 237.15, 219.20, 163.05, and 135.05 with proposed formulas of C16H29O+, C16H+27, C16H+19, and C16H29O+ respectively (Figure 5C). Compound 2 displayed a similar fragmentation pattern, yielding ions at m/z 263.20 (C18H31O+), 245.25 (C18H+29), and 133.10 (C10H+13) (Figure 5E).
Further structural validation was achieved through 1H NMR spectroscopy of H21. The spectrum revealed vinylic proton signals in the δ 5.2–5.5 ppm range, supporting the presence of unsaturated aliphatic chains. Strong methylene signals appeared in the δ 0.9–2.8 ppm region, indicating extended saturated carbon chains (Figure S7). These spectral features align with the presence of mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Quantitative analysis of the UV chromatograms indicated that Fraction H21 contains approximately 44% palmitoleic acid and 56% linoleic acid (0.8:1) based on peak area (Figure 5F). These findings confirm that H21 contains a mixture of structurally defined fatty acids 1 and 2, which likely contribute to the observed antiviral activity. Based on this composition, the estimated amounts of compounds 1 and 2 in the total crude extract are approximately 2.46% and 3.13%, respectively.
Fraction H22 showed 92.83% inhibition of 3CLpro at 50 µg/mL. It eluted with 100% acetonitrile and appeared as a single UV-absorbance peak. LCMS-QTOF analysis revealed two components with m/z 313.2736 [M+H-H2O]+ and 267.2329 [M-H] (Figures S13 and S14). LCMS-QTOF and MS/MS confirmed these as aggreceride B 3, and 9-heptadecenoic acid 4, respectively (Figure 6 and Table 1), with molecular formulas C19H38O4 (DBE = 1.0) and C17H32O2 (DBE = 2.0) (Figures S13, S14, S24 and S25). 1H NMR spectra of H22 showed characteristic aliphatic (δ 0.7–2.8 ppm) and olefinic resonances (δ 5.2–5.5 ppm), supporting the presence of unsaturated fatty acid and monoacylglycerol structures (Figure S8).
Fraction H23 showed 94.54% inhibition. LCMS-TQ and QTOF analyses identified three major compounds (Figure 6, Table 1): an unannotated compound (m/z 357.35 [M+H]+, C20H40N2O3), aggreceride C 5 (m/z 327.2888 [M+H-H2O]+, C20H40O4) (Figure S15) and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate 6 (m/z 355.2831 [M+H]+, C21H38O4) (Figure S16). The MS/MS spectra and high-resolution mass data matched reported structures in public databases (Figures S26 and S27). The 1H NMR spectra displayed vinylic signals for unsaturated fatty acids (δ 5.2–5.5 ppm) and glycerol-related signals (δ 3.5–4.3 ppm), supporting the identification of compounds 5 and 6 (Figure S9).
Fraction H24 exhibited 92.37% inhibition. Despite weak UV absorbance, TIC analysis revealed two dominant peaks. LCMS-QTOF and MS/MS confirmed the presence of aggreceride C 5 and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl nonadeca-9,12-dienoate 7 (m/z 369.2999 [M+H]+), consistent with C22H40O4 (DBE = 3.0) (Figure 6, Figures S17 and S28, Table 1). 1H NMR analysis of H24 showed vinylic resonances (δ 5.2–5.5 ppm) attributed to the hydroxylated fatty acid ester, distinguishing it from the saturated monoacylglycerol (δ 3.5–4.3 ppm) (Figure S10).
Fraction H20 showed 88.06% inhibition. LCMS-TQ revealed two UV peaks, corresponding to 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8 (C20H38O4, m/z 325.2739 [M+H-H2O]+, Figure 6 and Figure S18, Table 1), and compound 1. Compound 8 was identified based on its elemental composition and a diagnostic neutral loss of 74 Da in MS/MS, which corresponds to [glycerol-H2O] (Table 1 and Figure S29). Compound 1 was confirmed by comparison to authentic standards. 1H NMR supported the presence of aliphatic (δ 0.7–2.4 ppm) and vinylic proton environments (δ 5.3–5.4 ppm) (Figure S6).
Fraction H19 showed 85.39% inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro at 50 µg/mL. LCMS-QTOF analysis identified three main components: 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9, m/z 311.2588 [M+H-H2O]+, C19H36O4) (Figure S19), aggreceride A 10 (m/z 299.2581 [M+H-H2O]+, C18H36O4) (Figure S20), and linolenic acid 11 (m/z 277.2168 [M-H], C18H30O2) (Figure 6 and Figure S21, Table 1). Compounds 9 and 10 were characterized by their diagnostic neutral loss of 74 Da in MS/MS spectra, indicating the loss of a dehydrated glycerol group ([glycerol-H2O]), which aligns with monoacylglycerol fragmentation patterns (Figure 6, Figures S30 and S31 and Table 1). Compound 11 was identified based on its high-resolution mass, accurate elemental composition, and a DBE of 4.0, indicative of a trienoic unsaturated fatty acid. The 1H NMR spectrum of H19 displayed signals of aliphatic protons (δ 0.8–2.9 ppm), along with a triplet at δ 2.8 ppm indicating the bis-allylic protons of compound 11. Vinylic peaks at (δ 5.2–5.5 ppm) further support the identification of compounds 9 and 10 (Figure S5).
Fraction H17 showed 85.16% inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro at a concentration of 50 µg/mL and was found to contain three distinct compounds. High-resolution LCMS-QTOF analysis identified 9-HODE 12 (m/z 279.2330 [M+H-H2O]+, C18H32O3) (Figure 6 and Figure S22, Table 1), 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9 (m/z 311.2588 [M+H-H2O]+, C19H36O4) (Figure 6 and Figure S19, Table 1), and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoate 13 (m/z 297.2434, [M+H-H2O]+, C18H34O4) (Figure 6 and Figure S23, Table 1). The MS/MS fragmentation spectrum of compound 12 matched that of 9-HODE, showing characteristic neutral loss of water and fragment ions typical of hydroxylated linoleic acid derivatives (Figure S33). Compounds 9 and 13 exhibited a diagnostic neutral loss of 74 Da, corresponding to the loss of a dehydrated glycerol moiety ([glycerol-H2O]), which is a hallmark of monoacylglycerols (Figure 6, Figures S30 and S34, Table 1). The remaining fragment ions aligned with those of C16:1 and C15:1 fatty acids, respectively, confirming their structures as lipid-like compounds. The 1H NMR spectrum showed vinylic peaks (δ 5.2–5.5 ppm) and glycerol-related signals (δ 3.5–4.4 ppm), confirming the identification of compounds 9, 12, and 13 (Figure S3).
Fraction H18 exhibited 81.62% inhibition. LCMS-QTOF identified 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9 as the major component. The MS/MS spectra and high-resolution mass data were consistent with reported structures in public databases (Figure 6 and Figure S30, Table 1). 1H NMR spectra revealed a monoacylglycerol structure, with esterification at the sn-1 position of glycerol (δ 3.5–4.3 ppm) and a palmitoleic acid side chain (δ 0.8–2.5 ppm) (Figure S4).
Collectively, these findings indicate that lipid-derived compounds, encompassing unsaturated fatty acids and monoacylglycerols, are broadly distributed across the bioactive fractions (H17–H24) and are likely key contributors to the observed inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro.

2.6. Inhibitory Activities of Palmitoleic Acid 1 and Linoleic Acid 2

We encountered difficulties in purification and isolating fatty acids and their derivatives in pure form from the DSD454T strain extract. Therefore, pure compounds for additional analysis were obtained from suppliers. These compounds, including palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid, were tested against the 3CLpro inhibition assay. Their inhibitory efficacy against SARS-CoV-2-3CLpro was assessed using their IC50 values and matching correlation coefficients (R2). Palmitoleic acid demonstrated a strong inhibitory effect with an IC50 of 1.59 µg/mL (6.25 µM) and an R2 value of 0.99, indicating a positive correlation between concentration and inhibition. Conversely, linoleic acid demonstrated an IC50 value of 5.29 µg/mL (18.88 µM) and a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.99 (Figure 5G,H).

2.7. BODIPYTM 493/503 Staining Reveals Intracellular Lipid Distribution in Streptomyces Mycelia

We employed BODIPYTM 493/503 staining, a fluorescent lipophilic dye that selectively binds to neutral lipids, to check the presence and localization of intracellular lipids in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T mycelia. Images of the same field of view were taken and analyzed in brightfield, fluorescence, and merged channel modes (Figure 7). The brightfield image (Figure 7A) showed a thick network of branching hyphae, typical of the filamentous shape of Streptomyces. In Figure 7B, a strong green BODIPYTM 493/503 signal was observed along the hyphae. The overlaid fluorescence and brightfield images (Figure 7C) showed that the lipid signal was in the same place as the mycelial structures.
We observed that the BODIPYTM 493/503 fluorescence displayed intense spots but a heterogeneous distribution of lipid-rich compartments along the hyphae. This spatial distribution pattern indicates that lipid accumulation transpires throughout the mycelium rather than in designated subcellular regions. These microscopic observations are consistent with our HPLC and LCMS purification data, which indicated that approximately 63% of the total crude extract is composed of oily (lipid-based) material. Subsequent fractionation and chemical characterization of these materials have identified lipid compounds that most likely contribute to the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitory activity.

2.8. Comparative Lipid Metabolite Profiling of 3CLpro Inhibitory Streptomyces Strains DSD149T, DSD735T, DSD2604T, and DSD2893T

During bioassay-guided preparative HPLC purification of the extract from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, late-eluting fractions enriched in lipophilic components, demonstrated over 80% inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. These fractions, previously characterized as containing fatty acids and their derivatives, served as a reference for evaluating chemical similarity across other 3CLpro bioactive Streptomyces strains [48]. We separated polar and lipid-soluble parts of crude extracts from Streptomyces sp. DSD149T, Streptomyces sp. DSD735T, Streptomyces sp. DSD2893T, and Streptomyces sp. DSD2604T was partitioned into methanol and hexane fractions. In vitro screening at 10 µg/mL revealed that all hexane fractions inhibited 3CLpro by over 90%, whereas methanol fractions exhibited less than 30% inhibition (Figure S35).
We used LCMS-TQ analysis described in the Materials and Methods Section 4.7 for the hexane fractions to compare the lipid profiles of different strains. The DSD454H extracts exhibited six UV peaks at 190 nm, with retention times corresponding to those noted in the late-eluting HPLC fractions DSD454IH17–H24, previously linked to 3CLpro inhibition (Figure 8A and Figure S2). There was no significant absorbance at 254 nm across all five Streptomyces strains (Figure 8). Strains DSD454T and DSD149T displayed nearly identical chromatographic profiles, with the six lipid-associated peaks eluting at equivalent retention times and comparable relative intensities (Figure 8B). The IC50 values for both strains were also similar, at 2.43 µg/mL and 2.47 µg/mL, respectively [48]. On the other hand, DSD735T, DSD2893T, and DSD2604T all showed the six lipid-related peaks, but their intensities were very different. During the lipid-rich retention window (7.0–8.5 min), DSD735T and DSD2604T had lower peak intensities, while DSD2893T had levels that were in the middle (Table S9). These three strains were associated with higher IC50 values of 3.15 µg/mL, 3.92 µg/mL, and 4.73 µg/mL, respectively [48].
We used both Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) to look at the relationship between compound potency and chromatographic features. We did this by comparing IC50 values and peak areas (Peaks 1–6). Table S10 shows a summary of the correlation coefficients and their p-values. Palmitoleic acid 1 had the strongest positive linear correlation with IC50 (r = 0.71, p = 0.18) and a moderate rank correlation (ρ = 0.31) among all the peaks. 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9 exhibited a moderate linear correlation (r = 0.42, p = 0.48) and an insignificant rank correlation (ρ = 0.05). Aggreceride B 3 showed a moderate linear correlation (r = 0.35, p = 0.56) and the strongest rank correlation (ρ = 0.60). Linoleic acid 2 produced weak linear (r = 0.27, p = 0.65) and monotonic (ρ = 0.20) correlations. 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8, 9-heptadecenoic acid 4, and aggreceride C 5 exhibited minimal to weak correlations in both analyses, with 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8 showing r = 0.02 (p = 0.97), ρ = 0.10, and 9-heptadecenoic acid 4 and aggreceride C 5 showing r = −0.21 (p = 0.74), ρ = 0.10. No correlation attained statistical significance at the standard threshold of p < 0.05.

2.9. Molecular Docking Analysis of Palmitoleic Acid 1 and Linoleic Acid 2 with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro

To examine the potential antiviral interactions of palmitoleic acid 1 and linoleic acid 2 with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro, molecular docking studies were conducted, focusing on three functionally distinct sites on the protease: the catalytic site [6,11,15], the dimerization interface [24,27,29], and the cryptic site [25,28,30,49]. These sites were chosen because they are known to play important roles in enzymatic function and allosteric regulation. The active dyad and the substrate binding sites are necessary for the proteolytic processing of viral polyproteins [24]. The dimerization site facilitates the active protease dimer formation, and the cryptic site is proposed to be a regulatory pocket that can change the shape and activity of the enzyme [28]. Alotaketal analogue 19, a sesterterpenoid with an alkyl chain from a marine sponge with bioactivity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron [50], was used as a positive control. After docking simulations, we used the GB8 scoring function to calculate the free energy of structure-truncated MM/PB(GB)SA [51]. This function considers solvation effects and entropy, which makes it more accurate for estimating binding energy in dynamic or hydrophobic binding environments.
Alotaketal analogue 19 showed favorable and strong binding affinity at the catalytic site, as shown by its docking score of −6.5 kcal/mol and interactions with the residues Cys145, His41, Met49, and Glu166 with the GB8 rescoring binding free energy of −34.33. Meanwhile, GC376, a peptide-based known inhibitor of 3CLpro showed the highest binding affinity (−7.5 kcal/mol) at the catalytic site by having a strong hydrogen bonding interactions towards the interacting residues at the 3CLpro’s active site such as His41, Ser144, Cys145, His163, and His164 (Figure 9). It also exhibited hydrophobic interactions towards Met49, Gly143, Glu166, and Gln189 (Tables S11–S14). Compound 2 had a docking score of −4.7 kcal/mol and a GB8 value of −29.30. It interacted with fewer important residues at the active site and did not interact with His41 or Ser144. Nonetheless, the Cys145 interaction through hydrogen bonding in compound 2 may be crucial and specific (Figure 9A) while compound 1 had a docking score of −4.5 kcal/mol, which interacted with active site residues, such as His41, Cys145, Met49, Ser144, His163, Met165, Glu166, and Gln189 and its GB8 value was −22.47 (Tables S14 and S15).
Alotaketal analogue 19 also had strong affinity at the dimerization interface, with a docking score of −7.9 kcal/mol and interactions between with Met6 (GB8: −30.83). Meanwhile, a peptide inhibitor GC376 showed similar binding of −7.9 kcal/mol and GB8 of −27.37 and have hydrophobic interaction to important residues of dimeric site such as Met6, Ser139, and Glu290. There were very few interactions between compounds 1 and 2 and the dimeric site. Compound 1 had a docking score of −6.5 kcal/mol and is bound to dimeric site interacting with Met6 and Glu290 (GB8: −29.54) through van der Waals forces (Tables S11–S14). Meanwhile, compound 2 had a docking score of −6.7 kcal/mol and GB8 score of −27.24 (Figure 9B and Table S15), interacting with Met6 through an alkyl group and with Arg298 through van der Waals forces (Tables S11–S14).
Alotaketal analogue 19 also binds to the cryptic site, with a docking score of −7.0 kcal/mol and van der Waals interactions with Tyr239 and Leu272, along with an alkyl interaction with Leu287 (GB8: −25.12). Positive control GC376 showed the highest binding affinity at the cryptic site of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro showing −8.5 kcal/mol and GB8 value of −27.48 with hydrogen bonding to important residues to 3CLpro cryptic site such as Arg131, Leu287, and Asp289. Compound 1 has a docking score of −5.1 kcal/mol and interacts with Leu272, Leu287, Tyr239, Arg131, and Asp289. It also has a GB8 value of −29.90 (Figure 9A–C and Tables S11–S14). Meanwhile, with a docking score of −6.1 kcal/mol, compound 2 interacts with Leu272, Leu287, Asp289 and Arg131 (GB8: −29.18).
In the cryptic site, both fatty acids showed the same level of interaction across five amino acid residues (Arg131, Tyr239, Leu272, Leu287, and Asp289) (Figure 9C), as evidence in their binding energy showing no significant differences in this site (Figure 9D). The only difference is how these amino acids interact with each other. Compound 2 shows more hydrophobic (alkyl) interactions with Tyr239 compared to the van der Waals interaction of palmitoleic acid (Figure 9A) (Tables S11–S14). On the other hand, compound 1 exhibits a hydrogen bond with Arg131, signifying a generally more robust and specific interaction compared to the hydrophobic interactions (van der Waals) in compound 2.

2.10. Comparative Binding Affinities of Palmitoleic Acid 1 and Linoleic Acid 2 Across the Catalytic, Dimeric, and Cryptic Sites of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro

Statistical analysis was performed to confirm the consistency of measurements across replicates. The binding affinities of GC376 (peptide-based positive control), alotaketal C analogue 19 (lipid-based positive control), compound 1, and 2 were compared across the catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic binding sites of 3CLpro (Figure 9D).
At the catalytic site, GC376 (−7.5 kcal/mol) showed the strongest binding, followed by alotaketal C analogue 19 (−6.5 kcal/mol). Compounds 1 and 2 displayed moderate binding energies (−4.5 and −4.7 kcal/mol, respectively). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc testing indicated significant differences between GC376 and both fatty acids (p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between compounds 1 and 2 (p > 0.05). At the dimeric site, GC376 and alotaketal C analogue 19 exhibited similar binding affinities (−7.9 kcal/mol). Compounds 1 and 2 again showed moderate binding (−6.5 and −6.7 kcal/mol), with no significant difference between them (p > 0.999) (Figure 9D).
GC376 remained the strongest binder (−8.5 kcal/mol) at the cryptic allosteric site, followed by alotaketal C analogue 19 (−7.0 kcal/mol). Compound 2 showed stronger binding (−6.1 kcal/mol) than compound 1 (−5.1 kcal/mol), supported by a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate consistent binding trends across the three binding regions, with GC376 and the reference analogue exhibiting the highest affinities and linoleic acid 2 showing comparatively stronger engagement at the cryptic allosteric site.

2.11. Predicted Multi-Site Binding of Other Fatty Acids and Monoglycerides to SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro

The analysis of molecular docking showed that the lipid compounds displayed varying binding interactions within the catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic regions of the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro, as detailed in Tables S11–S13. In the study of 13 lipid compounds present in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T extract, several lipids showed the ability to interact with residues found in multiple functional sites of the 3CLpro.
We also observed that at the catalytic site, all compound interacted with at least three key residues. Compounds 3 and 5 demonstrated the most significant interaction with 12 amino acid residues, including Cys145, His163, His164, Met165, and Glu166, which are crucial for the enzyme’s activity. In a similar manner, compound 9 engaged with eleven catalytic residues. In contrast, compounds 4, 6, 11, and 12 consistently established hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions with both polar residues, such as Glu166 and His163, as well as hydrophobic ones like Met165, indicating stable binding within the active site (Figures S36–S38).
The binding at the dimeric site, which influences dimerization and activation of proteases, was relatively weak. Most compounds only interacted with one or two residues. Despite this, compound 8 showed good interactions with Met6, Ser10, and Arg298, suggesting that they might help disrupt the stability of the dimer interface.
At the cryptic site, several compounds interacted with residues like Arg131, Tyr239, Leu272, Leu287, Glu288, and Asp289, which have been linked to allosteric modulation. Compounds 5 and 6 displayed the most interactions at the cryptic sites. Each compound interacts with up to eight amino acid residues, including hydrogen bonding with Glu288 and hydrophobic interactions or alkyl interactions with Tyr239, Leu271, and Leu272. These interactions could either make inactive forms of the protease more stable or make it less flexible in terms of its shape.
In addition, a closer look at the GB8 scores showed that compounds 5 and 10 had strong predicted binding at the catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic sites. Their scores were similar to those of the positive control, alotaketal C analogue 19, suggesting a good binding profile. On the other hand, compounds 9 and 11 had moderate GB8 values and were less likely to bind to the dimeric and cryptic pockets. The positive controls, lipid-based positive control alotaketal C analogue 19 and peptide-based positive control GC376, consistently exhibited elevated GB8 values at all three target sites, thereby reinforcing the dependability of the scoring methodology. It is important to note that only 6 out of the 13 compounds were successfully evaluated for GB8 values due to technical issues encountered with the fastDRH platform [51]. At the time this study was conducted, the fastDRH server was inaccessible online, which prevented further analysis. Consequently, the remaining compounds were marked as Not Determined (ND) (Figure 9B).

2.12. Predicted Physicochemical, Pharmacokinetic, and Toxicological Properties of Fatty Acids and Monoacylglycerides

All thirteen lipid-derived compounds complied with Lipinski’s Rule of Five, indicating favorable oral drug-likeness (Table 2). The topological polar surface area (TPSA) values calculated were 37.30 Å2 for free fatty acids, 57.53 Å2 for hydroxylinoleic acid, and 66.76 Å2 for monoacylglycerides and similar glyceride analogues.
The predicted Caco-2 permeability values were between −5.156 and −5.044 log units, which means that most compounds had very good permeability. Compounds 3 and 5 were different because they had lower permeability (−5.156 to −5.155 log units) (Table 2). The predicted oral bioavailability (F20) was highest for fatty acids 1, 2, and 11 (0.148–0.222), and with moderate bioavailability scores for F30 and F50. The other compounds, on the other hand, exhibited moderate to poor F20 bioavailability (0.440–0.897), F30 (0.604–0.971), and F50 (0.628–0.967) bioavailability. Plasma protein binding (PPB) was high for all compounds (96.8–99.1%), which means that they bind well to serum proteins.
Predictions of cytochrome P450 (CYP) interactions showed that compounds 2 and 4 were most likely to inhibit CYP2C9. Most free fatty acids had a substrate probability close to 1.000, but compounds 3, 5, 8, 10, and 13 had a very high predicted substrate affinity. Several monoacylglycerides (compounds 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13; 0.814–1.000) were likely to inhibit CYP3A4, while all of the compounds were likely to be good CYP3A4 substrates. The likelihood of inhibiting CYP2C8 was also consistently high (0.737–1.000) for all compounds. It was predicted that fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) metabolism would be more effective for compounds 1 and 4 (0.480 and 0.662) (Table 2).
The predicted half-lives were usually short (0.354–0.950), and the clearance rates were between excellent and moderate. For free fatty acids, the rates were between 3.371 and 4.648 mL/min/kg, and for glyceride derivatives, they were up to 5.535 mL/min/kg (Table 2).
Toxicological predictions suggested low to moderate risk profiles. For most compounds, the Ames mutagenicity probabilities were less than or equal to 0.20. For linolenic acid 11 (0.551) and some monoacylglycerides (0.401–0.424), they were higher. Compound 4 (0.678) and some monoacylglycerides (0.554–0.584) had the highest chances of being toxic to humans’ livers (Table 2). The chances of hERG inhibition were low (≤0.201). The predicted rat oral acute toxicity (LD50) values for all 13 compounds were low, which means that these compounds are not very toxic.

3. Discussion

3.1. Morphological and Phylogenetic Characterization of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T

The marine-derived actinobacterial isolate Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, which shows complete 16S rRNA sequence similarity with S. enissocaesilis [48], displayed unique morphological traits characteristic of the Streptomyces genus. When Streptomyces sp. DSD454T is cultivated on MM1 agar, it produces a colony with concentric zones and a rough, wrinkled surface. This observation highlights the distinct life cycles of Streptomyces and suggests a complex process of mycelial development and morphogenesis [52]. The formation of a diffusible brown pigment and the existence of gray aerial mycelia and yellowish-brown substrate mycelia are consistent with pigmentation patterns associated with Streptomyces species’ production of secondary metabolites [53,54,55].
The use of scanning electron microscopy provided additional confirmation of the complex structure of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, revealing a complex network of elongated, cylindrical hyphae. The observations suggest a complex sporulation system, likely influenced by known developmental gene clusters such as whi and bld [56,57,58]. This cellular differentiation is required for their survival in environments where nutrients can vary, which is often associated with the initiation of secondary metabolite production [57].
To determine the position of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T within the phylogenetic tree, we constructed a maximum-likelihood tree using concatenated sequences from the housekeeping genes atpD, recA, and trpB. This approach is often employed to differentiate between closely related species in the genus Streptomyces, as single-gene phylogenies frequently lack the resolution required for precise identification. The analysis revealed that Streptomyces sp. DSD454T and S. ennisocaesilis DSD012T clustered closely together in a robust clade, which is supported by a bootstrap value of 90%. This positioning indicates a close evolutionary relationship between the two strains. Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, in contrast, did not group with other closely related species, including S. rochei and S. vinaceusdrappus. This indicates that it occupies a distinctive position within the genus.
The strong bootstrap value reinforces the distinction between DSD454T and S. ennisocaesilis DSD012T, providing us with assurance that this separation is reliable. While these two strains share many similarities, the phylogenetic differences indicate that DSD454T may represent a distinct taxon. To determine whether DSD454T is a new species, further studies are needed, including whole-genome comparisons (such as ANI and dDDH) and an examination of its characteristics. The current MLSA data clearly show that Streptomyces sp. DSD454T holds a unique place compared to known type strains, highlighting the need for further taxonomic evaluation.

3.2. Physiological and Biochemical Traits Suggest Ecological Adaptation

The differences in pigmentation observed in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T across various culture media indicates that the nutrient composition and environmental stimuli closely influence the process of pigment formation [59,60,61]. The strain’s physiological tolerance, as demonstrated in this study, highlights its ecological flexibility and its ability to flourish in harsh environments such as marine sediments. These observed physiological tolerances include salinity levels as high as 7% NaCl, pH levels ranging from 4 to 10, and temperatures between 28 and 45 °C, with an optimal temperature of 37 °C. These characteristics, influenced by its habitat in marine sediment, highlight how well-suited it is as a flexible microbial system for producing compounds under a range of fermentation conditions. The enzymatic profile also highlights the unique adaptations to specific ecological niches. The positive activity of alkaline phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase suggest their significant involvement in the recycling of nutrients, particularly through processes like phosphorus turnover, proteolysis, and the breakdown of chitin [62,63,64]. Moreover, activities of valine arylamidase, α-mannosidase, and esterase (C4), alongside the absence of α-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, and α-fucosidase activities, indicate a metabolism that has been specially adapted to thrive in nutrient-poor marine sediments. This array of enzymes reflects the strategies used by marine sediment-derived actinobacteria, which depend on the gradual breakdown of organic matter, hydrocarbons, and chitin-based materials to obtain nutrients continuously [62,63,64].

3.3. Extraction and Fractionation Reveal Abundant Lipid Compounds

The crude extract from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T exhibited fractions that significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro after being fractionated by HPLC. The majority of these fractions occurred in the late-eluting regions of the chromatographic profile. The fractions that eluted at high concentrations of organic solvent, almost 100% acetonitrile, showed the highest levels of inhibitory activity, indicating the presence of hydrophobic compounds with limited solubility in water. This elution pattern reveals a major difference compared to traditional polar or peptide-based viral protease inhibitors, such as the positive control GC376 [15]. Hence, the chromatographic behavior observed indicates a unique category of non-polar, lipid-like secondary metabolites with inhibitory effects against 3CLpro. The increase in activity observed in this specific hydrophobic region suggests a related set of compounds, which may include long-chain fatty acid amides, glycerol-like lipids, or alkylated small molecules. Many of these compounds are recognized for their interactions with membrane-associated or hydrophobic targets, including viral proteases [65,66,67,68].
The assay protocol was modified to accurately assess the inhibitory activity of the hydrophobic and poorly soluble fractions, as outlined in Section 4.9. By employing this adjusted approach, we successfully reduced variability caused by solubility differences and attained accurate measurements of 3CLpro inhibition. Linking specific inhibitory profiles to their corresponding retention times allowed for a more reliable comparison of the bioactivity of the chromatographic fractions, thereby facilitating the dereplication process. The data obtained from this testing provide a valuable basis for annotating putative compounds present in the DSD454T extract and prioritizing candidates for further compound characterization.

3.4. Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Diverse Lipids and Fatty Acid Derivatives

Dereplication of 3CLpro bioactive HPLC fractions (H15–H24) from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T has identified a cluster of compounds with characteristics consistent with those of lipid-derived secondary metabolites. The two major groups included unsaturated fatty acids and monoacylglycerols. These compound classes are often linked to microbial lipid metabolism and ecological interactions between microorganisms [47,69,70,71]. Actinomycetes frequently biosynthesize these compound classes via Type II fatty acid synthase (FAS II) systems, which utilize various enzymes to accelerate specific steps in the elongation and modification of fatty acids. This provides the system with more flexibility and regulatory control than the eukaryotic Type I system, and it often yields complex, lipophilic structures with a wide range of bioactivities [69,72,73,74,75]. These compounds have been increasingly acknowledged in bacteria not only for their antimicrobial and cytotoxic attributes but also for their ecological functions in chemical defense and interspecies signaling [69,76,77,78]. The possible discovery of lipid-tail-modified compounds in these fractions highlights an unexplored chemical domain with potential for the development of antiviral drugs [79,80].
Important unsaturated fatty acids found include palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, linolenic acid 11, and 9-heptadecenoic acid 4. This suggests that Streptomyces sp. DSD454T may have specialized its metabolism to better handle external stress and a lack of nutrients during experimental fermentation. Across fractions H17–H24, several monoacylglycerols were found next to their free fatty acids. There were 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoate 13, and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate 6, as well as aggrecerides A 10, B 3, and C 5, which are structurally similar [81,82]. These compounds likely originate from the acylation of glycerol by bifunctional acyltransferases attached to membranes [83]. Reports documented that these esterification reactions are often observed in Streptomyces during morphological differentiation or the stationary phase [52,84,85]. Monoacylglycerols and their free acid precursors are consistently identified, suggesting a controlled lipid biosynthesis network that could promote membrane fluidity in stressful situations [69,70,84,86]. In addition to standard fatty acids and monoacylglycerols, structurally altered lipids, such as oxidized derivatives like 9-HODE 12, were also identified. These compounds likely originate from enzymatic tailoring reactions, including oxidation, hydroxylation, and N-acylation. These are biosynthetic strategies that are often encoded in gene clusters or operons that modify lipids [46,87,88].

3.5. BODIPYTM 493/503 Staining Reveals Lipid Accumulation Within Mycelia of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T

We visualized the buildup of intracellular lipids in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T using BODIPYTM 493/503 staining. The green fluorescence signals were observed throughout the mycelial network, with varying intensity spots indicating the existence of lipid-rich areas scattered within the hyphae. These distinct spatial distributions resemble lipid droplets or comparable storage structures in filamentous bacteria, where lipid reserves are utilized for growth, development, and metabolic adjustments [47,70,71,85,89].
The lipid accumulation in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, as shown by BODIPYTM 493/503 staining, corroborates our chemical and quantitative analyses. Approximately 63% of the total crude extract comprises oily and lipid-based components, including fatty acids and monoacylglycerols, as confirmed by HPLC, LCMS, and NMR profiling. The exact biosynthetic pathways for these compounds are still not fully understood; however, the lipid enrichment observed suggests that intracellular lipid reservoirs in Streptomyces may have roles that extend beyond mere passive storage. Rather, they could signify metabolically active centers that aid in the synthesis of specific lipids related to secondary metabolism and chemical defense. This corresponds with new perspectives that connect the arrangement within cells and the division of space with metabolic flow and the production of natural products in filamentous actinomycetes.

3.6. Comparative Lipidomics Across Bioactive Streptomyces Strains

In this work, we also investigated the chemical profiles of five bioactive Streptomyces strains with inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro to determine whether lipophilic compounds identified in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T are consistently produced and whether specific chromatographic features correlate with compound potency.
Lipophilic compounds were detected in the hexane fractions of all strains, and six shared peaks were observed across chromatograms recorded at 190 nm. These peaks matched the retention times of active lipophilic compounds from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. The similarity in chromatographic profiles between DSD454T and DSD149T, especially in peak pattern and relative intensity, corresponded with their nearly identical IC50 values (2.43 µg/mL and 2.47 µg/mL, respectively). This observation suggests a link between lipid content and antiviral activity. Although Streptomyces spp. DSD735T, DSD2893T, and DSD2604T also displayed the same six lipid peaks, their lower intensities in the key retention window (7.0–8.5 min) coincided with higher IC50 values. Hence, this indicates a possible relationship between the abundance and potency of lipids in the extract.
A correlation analysis was performed between chromatographic peak areas and IC50 values to further investigate these observations. Although none of the correlations were statistically significant (p < 0.05), likely due to the small sample size (n = 5), some trends were observed. Palmitoleic acid 1 showed the strongest positive linear correlation with IC50 and a moderate monotonic association, which means it may be linked to lower bioactivity. Aggreceride B 3 exhibited a moderate linear correlation and the most robust rank-based correlation, suggesting a possible nonlinear or threshold-based relationship. 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9 exhibited moderate Pearson correlations and weak Spearman coefficients, indicating inconsistencies in its association with bioactivity. In both analyses, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8, linoleic acid 2, 9-heptadecenoic acid 4, and aggreceride C 5 were weak or not at all correlated.
Although the results lack statistical significance, the observed patterns, particularly for palmitoleic acid 1 and aggreceride B 3, suggest that specific lipophilic components may influence 3CLpro inhibitory activity. The presence of lipid peaks in all strains suggests that they represent a shared chemical characteristic among 3CLpro-active Streptomyces spp. However, the variance in intensity indicates that the efficacy of 3CLpro inhibition may be influenced by variations in lipid content or structural analogs. These results establish a foundation for subsequent study utilizing targeted isolation and extensive strain libraries to investigate the influence of lipophilic compounds on antiviral activity.

3.7. Confirmation of Palmitoleic Acid 1 and Linoleic Acid 2 and Their Inhibitory Activity Against 3CLpro

The metabolomic profiling of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T exhibited many lipid-like compounds, as identified using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (TQMS). Among the various mass spectrometry signals associated with fatty acids and other hydrophobic compounds, only compounds 1 and 2 were unambiguously identified. Their structures were further validated using tandem MS/MS, NMR, and direct comparison with authentic reference standards.
The dereplication technique facilitated the first annotation of more lipid-like compounds; nevertheless, these identifications were solely dependent on mass-based spectrum matching and lacked independent validation. Consequently, the confidence in these proposed annotations was insufficient to justify their incorporation into subsequent in vitro biological experiments. Furthermore, our attempts to extract these compounds were unsuccessful, primarily due to their high lipophilicity and limited chromatographic resolution, as evidenced by the co-elution of lipid compounds. These technical restrictions made it hard to validate their structure and test their biological activity.
Consequently, only compounds 1 and 2, whose identities were clearly verified, proceeded to in vitro biological testing. In these assays, we employed authentic standards, since the extraction of the native compounds from the sample was unreliable under our laboratory conditions, as previously outlined. Of the two compounds tested, compound 1 showed greater activity with an IC50 of 1.59 µg/mL (6.25 µM), while compound 2 had an IC50 of 5.29 µg/mL (18.88 µM). Although these findings are promising, additional validation in appropriate in vivo models is crucial to verify the antiviral effectiveness and pharmacodynamic properties of palmitoleic and linoleic acids.
The enhanced inhibitory activity of compound 1 against 3CLpro was somewhat surprising, considering that compound 2 (C18:2, ω-6), a well-known polyunsaturated fatty acid, has been thoroughly investigated for its anti-inflammatory and broad-spectrum antiviral effects [90,91,92,93]. Research has increasingly demonstrated that compound 2 interacts with a specific hydrophobic pocket in the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. This interaction stabilizes the protein in a “locked,” non-infectious state, thereby inhibiting its ability to engage with the ACE2 receptor [90,91,94]. Interestingly, molecular docking studies of long-chain fatty acids revealed that those with extended carbon chains (C20-C24) in contrast to shorter-chain analogs like compound 2 (C18:2), show a consistently higher binding affinity for the fatty acid pocket in the “locked” conformation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [95]. Reports also documented that compound 2 exhibits a strong interaction with SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) through hydrophobic interactions with various residues. This interaction disrupts viral RNA synthesis and replication in both in vitro and in vivo models [96,97].
While earlier research has mainly concentrated on the interactions of fatty acids with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [90,91] and the RdRp protein [96], there are no existing reports detailing the direct inhibition of the 3CLpro through allosteric binding by fatty acids. Although compound 1 has been less explored compared to compound 2, their structural resemblance indicates a possible common mechanism of action, likely involving allosteric modulation. The initial findings offer insights into the structure-activity relationships (SARs) of microbial-derived fatty acids, specifically regarding the impact of mono-versus polyunsaturation on binding affinity at the cryptic and dimeric regions of 3CLpro.
To better interpret the biochemical activity of the two fatty acids in the context of their predicted binding preferences, we integrated the experimental inhibition data with the computational docking results. Our findings enabled us to evaluate the experimentally observed inhibition of compounds 1 and 2 in relation to their predicted binding characteristics with 3CLpro. This comparison was carried out by examining the relationship between their biochemical inhibition and the binding affinities obtained through docking, supported by statistical cross-validation. Compound 1 exhibited markedly stronger biochemical inhibition, showing approximately three-fold greater potency than compound 2 (IC50 = 6.25 µM vs. 18.88 µM). In contrast, docking analysis showed that compound 2 consistently displayed higher predicted binding affinity across the catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic sites of 3CLpro. This difference is expected, as docking evaluates static ligand–protein interactions within defined pockets, whereas IC50 values reflect inhibition under assay conditions influenced by solvation, molecular flexibility, and hydrophobic interactions. Statistical cross-validation further confirmed that the experimental and computational datasets were internally consistent, showing low variance across docking replicates and stable IC50 estimates across assay replicates. Taken together, these findings show that compound 1 demonstrates greater functional inhibition in vitro, whereas compound 2 exhibits stronger predicted affinity for non-catalytic pockets, highlighting the complementary nature of their interaction with 3CLpro.

3.8. Predicted Multi-Site Interactions of Natural Lipids from Marine Streptomyces with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro

Molecular docking studies were conducted to examine the interaction between compounds 1 and 2 with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and to determine their binding properties, gaining insight into how molecular differences may influence their biological activity. While much of current inhibitor design focuses on the catalytic site [6,11,15], growing evidence suggests that dimerization and cryptic pockets could serve as effective and potentially superior targets [24,25,27,28,29]. The dimerization site is essential for the assembly of the catalytically active 3CLpro dimer. This is governed by key amino acid residues such as Arg4, Met6, Ser10, Gly11, Glu14, Asn28, Ser139, Phe140, Ser147, Glu166, Glu290, and Arg298 [27,29]. Perturbation of the dimeric junction significantly compromises 3CLpro activity, as indicated by previous studies [27,29]. Meanwhile, the cryptic site, often hidden in the apo state, can be uncovered or activated upon ligand binding, offering a way to disrupt protease structure or limit substrate access [28,98]. Important residues at these sites include Lys5, Met6, Pro108, Gly109, Arg131, Trp218, Phe219, Tyr239, Glu240, Leu271, Leu272, Leu287, Glu88, Asp289, Glu290, Arg298, Gln299, and Val303 [25]. Molecular docking analysis shows that both 1 and 2 interact with key residues.
The results of molecular docking experiments, which include catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic sites, along with binding affinity, IC50 values, and GB8 energy scores, indicate a multi-site inhibition mechanism for compounds 1 and 2. Compound 2 binds to the catalytic site by forming a hydrogen bond with Cys145, a residue crucial for the protease’s nucleophilic cleavage process. This specific interaction may disrupt the enzyme’s ability to catalyze reactions effectively. In contrast, compound 1 binds to the catalytic site by interacting with a wider range of residues, including His41, Ser144, and Glu166, mainly through van der Waals, hydrogen bonding, and alkyl interactions. Notably, compound 2 does not directly interact with Ser144 at the 3CLpro catalytic site. This absence of interaction suggests that compound 2 may be less effective at interfering with catalysis, which aligns with its higher IC50 value, as directly observed.
Both compounds exhibited a comparatively weak dimeric interface interaction, which is necessary for the enzymatic dimer of 3CLpro to function. Compound 1 interacted with Met6 and Glu290 through van der Waals forces, whereas compound 2 interacted with both Met6 (through alkyl forces) and Arg298 (through van der Waals forces). A lower GB8 score at the dimeric area for 1 (−29.54 compared to −27.24 for 2) indicates that these connections are weak, although they might make the dimer less stable.
At the cryptic site, both fatty acids interact with hydrophobic residues, such as Leu272 and Leu287. Interestingly, compound 1 interacts with Arg131 through a hydrogen bond, which may contribute to a stabilizing effect that promotes an inactive state of the enzyme. Meanwhile, compound 2 interacts with Tyr239 and Leu287 through alkyl contacts, as well as with other hydrophobic residues Arg131 and Asp289 through van der Waals interactions. This indicates a chemically distinct but functionally similar approach to allosteric modulation. Both compounds exhibit comparable GB8 values at this site (−29.18 for compound 2 compared to −29.90 for compound 1), indicating that the cryptic site plays a crucial role in the overall binding energy and could serve as a secondary inhibitory hotspot.
We further gain insights into how compounds 1 and 2 interact with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro by utilizing the fastDRH webserver. This platform integrates conventional molecular docking with MM/PB(GB)SA-based rescoring and per-residue energy analysis [51]. Instead of relying solely on docking scores, we focused on GB8 rescoring values to more accurately reflect actual binding affinities. GB8 stands out from traditional docking functions by integrating solvation effects, entropy, and the flexibility of both ligands and receptors. This makes it particularly effective for assessing interactions at non-classical or dynamic binding sites, including dimerization and cryptic pockets [51].
Fatty acids exhibit structural flexibility and hydrophobic characteristics, and their interactions with proteins often engage adaptable or allosteric surfaces. Consequently, the GB8 rescoring proved to be particularly useful in revealing the greater inhibitory activity of compound 1 (IC50 = 6.25 µM) compared to compound 2 (IC50 = 18.88 µM), despite compound 1 showing somewhat lower or similar binding affinities across sites (ranging from −4.5 to −6.5 kcal/mol) compared to compound 2 (−4.7 to −6.7 kcal/mol). The observed difference becomes clear when examining the GB8 scores, which provide a broader assessment of binding stability by considering solvation and conformational changes. Notably, compound 1 had higher GB8 scores at the cryptic site (−29.90) and the dimeric site (−29.54). These scores show that the binding site is more stable in terms of its shape. This observation may facilitate enhanced inhibition of 3CLpro. Moreover, these results suggest that the dimerization and cryptic sites may serve as more accessible and energetically favorable targets for lipophilic inhibitors compared to the highly conserved active site.
The fact that other lipid compounds, including monoacylglycerols and aggrecerides, can bind to three different sites, suggests that they could be useful for a wide range of therapeutic uses. Because of their amphipathic property, they can interact with both the enzyme’s polar and hydrophobic regions. This property may facilitate various types of inhibition, including competitive and non-competitive interactions. This twofold approach enhances their effectiveness against viruses and may reduce the chances of mutations related to resistance developing at a single binding site.

3.9. The Safety and Pharmacokinetic Effects of Predicted ADMET Profiles

The fatty acids and monoacylglycerides derived from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T lipids showed good drug-likeness because they all followed Lipinski’s Rule of Five. Additionally, all had TPSA values suitable for passive absorption. For most compounds, the predicted Caco-2 permeability was very good. However, compounds 3 and 5 had slightly lower values. Some fatty acids (compounds 1, 2, and 11) exhibited the highest oral bioavailability, whereas monoacylglycerides typically required higher predicted exposure thresholds.
The high plasma protein binding (96.8–99.1%) of the compounds indicates prolonged systemic retention; however, it constrains the free drug fraction, thereby increasing the likelihood of displacement interactions. Moreover, the predicted CYP inhibition profiles indicate a risk of metabolic interactions, particularly with CYP2C9 (compounds 2 and 4) and CYP2C8 (all compounds). There is also significant CYP3A4 metabolism. FAAH metabolism of compounds 1 and 4 may yield supplementary bioactive compounds.
The short-predicted half-lives and moderate to high clearance values suggest that strategies for formulation or structure are needed to increase exposure. Toxicological predictions were generally positive, indicating low mutagenicity, hERG inhibition, and acute toxicity. However, certain compounds have shown increased possibilities for hepatotoxicity and mutagenicity, requiring further safety assessment.

3.10. Limitations of the Study and Future Directions

Despite the promising results of this study, it is essential to consider the specific limitations when interpreting them. Initially, this research did not evaluate viral inhibition within a SARS-CoV-2 context; rather, we established our IC50 values through an in vitro FRET bioassay model instead of a specific viral infection assay. Secondly, although our in vitro findings indicated distinct inhibitory patterns, we did not conduct direct target validation on SARS-CoV-2 to verify interaction with 3CLpro, and the possibility of off-target effects remains unexcluded. Third, traditional docking and scoring techniques are fundamentally constrained, as they frequently overlook protein flexibility, ligand-induced conformational changes, and solvent-mediated interactions that significantly affect binding affinity. To capture these dynamic characteristics, complementary in silico methodologies, such as molecular dynamics simulations, are essential. Lastly, our study was confined to fatty acids and monoacylglycerols due to purifying challenges that hindered a thorough profile of the lipidome of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T.
These results offer several avenues for future research. Initially, it is reasonable to confirm docking predictions using surface plasmon resonance or isothermal titration calorimetry. Moreover, enhancing lipid purification methods, such as chemical modification, is needed to retrieve the more difficult-to-isolate lipid elements from the extract. Further investigation is needed to functionally evaluate the additional lipid compounds in this study. Cell-based in vitro and in vivo testing of these compounds is important for validating the biological significance of docking predictions and establishing structure-activity relationships. On the other hand, ADMET profiles indicate that these natural lipids have development potential, provided that metabolic stability and the risks of CYP-mediated interactions are considered in future optimization and validation studies. Ultimately, evaluating palmitoleic and linoleic acids in live SARS-CoV-2 assays, whether individually or in combination with antivirals like remdesivir, may yield direct insights into their therapeutic potential.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Morphological and Biochemical Characterization of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T

The morphological features of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T was observed based on growth rate, substrate, and mycelial features on enriched marine medium 1 agar (MM1) [99,100,101,102]. The mycelia and aerial spores were visualized using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JCM-7000 NeoScope, Tokyo, Japan). The cells were centrifuged and pelleted, then fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 h and subsequently incubated at 4 °C. They were washed twice with PBS and sequentially dehydrated using 30%, 50%, 85%, 95%, and absolute ethanol. The dehydrated cells were air-dried before mounting on a carbon tape, and then placed in an aluminum stub. Both mycelia and spores were then sputter-coated with gold for 30 s. The morphology was observed at 5000× magnification in high-vacuum mode with standard resolution.
The physiological characterization of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T was carried out by examining growth at various temperatures, pH levels, and salt concentrations. The Streptomyces sp. DSD454T was investigated for its temperature tolerance by incubating at 4 °C, 28 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C for 7 days. Tolerance to pH was determined at levels ranging from pH 4.0 to 10.0, at 1 pH unit intervals. Additionally, salt tolerance was assessed using the previously described method [99]. The utilization of carbon sources was determined using glucose (1% w/v), sucrose (1% w/v), starch (1% w/v), and trehalose (1% w/v) as well as nitrogen sources such as peptone (0.2% w/v), yeast extract (0.2% w/v), and casein (0.2% w/v), for organic nitrogen sources, and ammonium sulfate (0.2% w/v) and urea (0.2% w/v) for inorganic nitrogen sources. Furthermore, its physiological characteristics were evaluated by cultivating the cells in International Streptomyces Project (ISP) media (ISP2, ISP3, ISP4, and ISP9) and incubating them at 28 °C for 7 days. Additionally, the enzymatic and biochemical characteristics of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T was analyzed using API ZYM kit (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) using previously established method [103].

4.2. Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA) and Phylogenetic Tree Construction

Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) was performed following established methodologies [101,103]. Three conserved housekeeping genes were selected for amplification: atpD (ATP synthase F1 β-subunit) using primers atpDF (5′-GTCGGCGACTTCACCAAGGGCAAGGTGTTCAACACC-3′) and atpDR (5′-GTGAACTGCTTGGCGACGTGGGTGTTCTGGGACAGGAA-3′); recA (recombinase A) using primers recAF (5′-CCGCRCTCGCACAGATTGAACGSCAATTC-3′) and recAR (5′-GCSAGGTCGGGGTTGTCCTTSAGGAAGTTGCG-3′); and trpB (tryptophan synthase β-subunit) using primers trpBF (5′-GCGCGAGGACCTGAACCACACCGGCTCACACAAGATCAACA-3′) and trpBR (5′-TCGATGGCCGGGATGATGCCCTCGGTGCGCGACAGCAGGC-3′), following the primer sets described by Sabido et al. [101]. PCR amplifications were carried out in 20 µL reaction volumes containing 10 µL SYBR® SuperMix, 2 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 mM), 2 µL nuclease-free water, and 4 µL DNA template (20 ng/µL). The thermocycling program consisted of an initial denaturation at 98 °C for 3 min; 40 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 60 s; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min, conducted on a BIOER LineGene 9600 Real-Time Thermal Cycler (Hangzhou, China). PCR products were purified using the QIAquick® PCR Cleanup Kit (Qiagen Ltd., Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed by 1st BASE (Apical Scientific Sdn. Bhd., Seri Kembangan, Malaysia). Resulting sequences were concatenated to generate composite MLSA sequences. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted using MUSCLE in MEGA v11.0 (Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA) [104]. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using the Kimura two-parameter model [105], with nodal support assessed through 1000 bootstrap replicates. All gene sequences generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers PV771072, PV771073, and PV771074.

4.3. Large-Scale Cultivation and Crude Extraction of Secondary Metabolites from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T

The large-scale cultivation of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T as a source of bioactive 3CLpro secondary metabolites was followed using the previously described method [101,103].

4.4. Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) via Flash Column Chromatography

To remove highly polar media components from the crude extract of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T, a large-scale SPE was conducted using flash column chromatography (Biotage Isolera One, Uppsala, Sweden). A total of 1.5 g of crude extract was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol (MeOH) and applied to a C18 SPE sample disc. The sample disc was dried under vacuum and subsequently inserted into a 30 g C18 flash chromatography cartridge (Biotage® Sfär, 100 Å, 30 µm) for further processing. H2O and MeOH served as the mobile phases, which were pumped at a rate of 25 mL/min. The cartridge was preconditioned with 3 column volumes (CV) of MeOH followed by 3 CVs of H2O. Elution with H2O was performed for 3 CVs, followed by elution with 3 CVs of MeOH. The MeOH eluate was dried in vacuo at 35 °C and was coded as DSD454I. A total of 3.08 g of DSD454I (77% yield) was obtained from 4.0 g of crude extract.

4.5. Purification of DSD454I via Preparatory High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (Prep-HPLC)

To isolate the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors, the compounds obtained from DSD454I were purified using reversed-phase HPLC. A Waters® preparatory HPLC system (Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK) equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array (PDA), Waters® Acquity QDa, quaternary chromatographic pump (Waters® 2535 Quaternary pump), manual injector, a make-up pump (Waters® 515 make-up pump), and a splitter that divides the outlet flow from the column to the detectors and fraction collector (Waters® Fraction Collector III) at a ratio of 1:1000 was utilized. The QDa is supplied with a constant flow of N2 gas at 100 psi. Data were acquired at 190–700 nm in the PDA and 100–1200 m/z in the QDa. Purification was conducted on a Waters® Xbridge Prep C18 column (5 μm, 19 × 150 mm) using H2O/MeCN as the mobile phase, pumped as follows: 80:20 H2O/MeCN (0 to 4.24 min), linear gradient elution to 100% MeCN (4.24 to 43.24 min), 100% MeCN (43.24 to 51.66 min), reverting to 80:20 H2O/MeCN (51.66 to 54.66 min), and equilibration at 80:20 H2O/MeCN (54.66 to 60.00 min). The DSD454I sample was dissolved in MeOH to create a 762 mg/mL solution. The sample was then injected at 90 µL/injection, and fraction collection was performed every min. The fractions were pooled based on the PDA signal to obtain 25 DSD454I HPLC fractions.

4.6. High-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

The chemical profile of the HPLC fractions was investigated using high resolution mass spectrometry. MSE data acquisition (low energy, 0 eV; high energy, ramp 25 to 75 eV) in centroid mode was performed on a Waters Synapt® XS QToF mass spectrometer, coupled with a Waters Acquity® UPLC Class I and an electrospray ionization (ESI) source (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The mass spectrometer was calibrated in both positive and negative polarity in resolution mode using sodium formate (NaHCOO) as calibrant. MSE data were acquired over a mass ion range of 100 to 1500 Da, with a scan time set at 0.15 s. Separation of compounds was conducted in a C18 column (Waters Acquity® UPLC BEH, 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm) held at 30 °C. The mobile phase consisted of H2O/MeCN (Solvent A/Solvent B) with 0.1% HCOOH pumped at 0.3 mL/min as follows: 20% B (0 to 0.5 min), 20% to 100% B (0.5 to 5.5 min), 100% B (5.5 to 7.5 min), 100% to 20% B (7.5 to 8.0 min), and 20% B (8.0 to 8.5 min). Compounds eluting at different retention times were subjected to a capillary voltage of 3 kV (positive) or 1.5 kV (negative), with a 100 °C source temperature, a 500 L/h desolvation gas (N2) flow, and a 250 °C desolvation temperature. A lockspray mass correction was performed using leucine-enkephalin (m/z 556.2771 [M+H]+, m/z 554.2615 [M-H]). Acquired MSE data were processed using MassLynx® software version 4.2 (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Dereplication using accurate mass measurements and MS/MS spectral matches from databases such as Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking (GNPS) [106], PubChem [107], StreptomeDB [108], and CFM-ID [109] was performed.

4.7. LCMS-TQ Chemical Profiling of HPLC Fractions

HPLC fractions that showed >80% SARS-CoV-2 3CLPro inhibition were investigated using LCMS-TQ. Samples were dissolved in MeOH to create a 2 mg/mL stock solution and then diluted 20-fold with MeOH to create a 100 ng/µL solution. The working solutions were injected into the LCMS system (Shimadzu LCMS 8045®, Kyoto, Japan) at 3 µL (300 ng). A Phenomenex Synergi® (Torrance, CA, USA) C18 column (4 µm, 80 Å, 100 × 2 mm) held at 40 °C was used as the stationary phase, and H2O and MeCN with 0.1% HCOOH served as the mobile phase. The mobile phase was pumped at 0.25 mL/min as follows: 1.5 min at 65% MeCN, 1.5 min to 14.0 min gradient elution from 65% to 100% MeCN, 14.0 min to 17.0 min at 100% MeCN, 17.0 min to 19.0 min from 100% to 65%, and 19.0 min to 20.0 min at 65% MeCN. Data were acquired at UV 254 and 190 nm. The optimized MS parameters were used in the experiment: 2 L/min nebulizing gas, 10 L/min heating gas, 10 L/min drying gas, 300 °C interface temperature, 250 °C desolvation line temperature, and 400 °C heating block temperature. MS data were acquired over a mass-to-charge (m/z) range of 100–1500 and were visualized using LabSolutions® software version 5.114 (Shimadzu). MS/MS analyses of precursor m/z were performed at 15–40 eV. Dereplication of MS/MS data and spectral matches was carried out using the GNPS [106] and CFM-ID [109].

4.8. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

The 1H NMR spectral data of HPLC fractions were recorded in CDCl3 (99.8%) at 298 K and 600 MHz on Bruker Avance® NMR (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) spectrometer equipped with 5 mm triple resonance cryoprobe with 1H/19F, 13C, and 15N direct detection. The operating frequency for 1H nuclei was at 600 MHz, and a standard Bruker pulse program was used for all the performed 1H NMR experiments. The 1D- NMR spectra were calibrated based on chloroform residual peak (i.e., 1H at 7.26 ppm). TopSpin® Software version 4.1.4 was used to acquire the 1D- and 2D-NMR data, while both TopSpin® Software version 4.1.4 and MestreNova® software version 14.2.2 were used to perform post-processing on the spectral data.

4.9. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Assay for SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Inhibition and IC50 Determination

SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro assay kits containing the 3CLpro assay buffer, GC376 (a well-established 3CLpro inhibitor used as the positive control) [15,110,111], dithiothreitol (DTT), and the fluorogenic 3CLpro substrate were employed in this experiment. The substrate was an internally quenched 14-mer peptide (KTSAVLQSGFRKME) labeled with DABCYL at the N-terminus and EDANS at the C-terminus. Inhibition of protease activity results in a measurable fluorescence signal, which was quantified using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based detection system [10]. For assay setup, 30 µL of diluted 3CLpro was dispensed into wells designated for the positive control, negative control, and test inhibitors. This was followed by the addition of 10 µL of the appropriate vehicles, GC376, or sample solutions. For blank controls, 30 µL of 1 mM DTT was added to blank well, while 10 µL of inhibitor buffers were added to blank wells. Plates were incubated at room temperature with gentle agitation for 30 min. The reaction was initiated by adding 10 µL of the fluorogenic substrate to each well under dark conditions. Final assay conditions consisted of 10 µg/mL sample, 0.1% DMSO, and 100 µM GC376. The 96-well plates were maintained in the dark at room temperature for 8 h. All experiments were performed in duplicate. Fluorescence intensity was recorded using a BMG Labtech CLARIOstar (BMG LabTech, Ortenberg, Germany) microplate reader at 360 nm excitation and 460 nm emission. Readings from blank were subtracted from GC376 and vehicle values, while readings from blank were subtracted from sample and vehicle values. The 3CLpro inhibitory activity of the HPLC fractions was determined following the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modifications, as previously reported. IC50 values were calculated using the same workflow, in which percent inhibition (mean ± SEM) was analyzed through nonlinear regression of dose–response curves using GraphPad Prism v9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) [48].

4.10. Assessment of Lipophilic Compounds in 3CLpro Active Streptomyces Strains

To assess the distribution of these lipophilic compounds across other bioactive Streptomyces strains, crude extracts from Streptomyces spp. DSD149T, DSD735T, DSD2893T, and DSD2604T were prepared in the same manner as strain DSD454T and partitioned using methanol and hexane (1:1, v/v) to separate polar and lipid-soluble components. The hexane and methanol fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure and stored at −20 °C until use. In vitro screening of the hexane and methanol fractions was conducted to assess the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Each fraction was tested at a final concentration of 10 µg/mL using a fluorometric substrate-based enzymatic assay as described in Section 4.9. Inhibition percentages were calculated relative to untreated control wells.
Chemical profiling of bioactive fractions was performed by LCMS-TQ using the analytical method established for DSD454IH17–H24 (see Section 4.7). Comparative analysis focused on the retention window of 5.0–11.0 min, corresponding to the lipid-rich region identified in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T.
To evaluate the relationship between chromatographic peak areas and extract potency against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro, Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses were performed using IC50 values and the corresponding LC-UV peak intensities for each Streptomyces strain. Peak areas were derived from LC chromatograms recorded at 190 nm, and IC50 values of extracts were obtained from in vitro 3CLpro inhibition assays conducted at 10 µg/mL [48].
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to assess the strength and direction of linear relationships between IC50 values and individual peak areas. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was employed to evaluate monotonic relationships by comparing the ranked values of IC50 and peak intensities. Correlation coefficients and their associated two-tailed p-values were computed in Excel. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. Both correlation metrics were applied to the same set of five strains and seven chromatographic peaks. The correlation results were tabulated and ranked by the magnitude of their coefficients.

4.11. BODIPYTM 493/503 Staining of Streptomyces for Intracellular Lipid Visualization

Intracellular triacylglycerol lipids were visualized using the fluorescent dye BODIPYTM 493/503 (4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene), obtained from Invitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following a modified protocol of Aprilliana et al. [71]. Streptomyces sp. DSD454T were initially cultured in MM1 dextrose broth consisting of 10 g of dextrose monohydrate, 4 g of yeast extract, and 2 g of peptone dissolved in 1 L of artificial seawater and incubated for 3 days at room temperature using a shaking incubator. Post-incubation, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The resulting cell pellets were washed twice with 1 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.0). The washed cell pellets were transferred into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and resuspended in 100 µL of 2 µM BODIPYTM 493/503 staining solution in DMSO. The cell suspension was incubated for 30 min on ice in the dark. After staining, the cells were washed twice with PBS. The supernatant was discarded, and the stained cells were finally resuspended in 50 µL of PBS. An 8 µL aliquot of the cell suspension was dispensed onto a glass microscope slide. Fluorescent imaging was performed using Olympus IX-83 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) under the green channel and fluorophore specific for BODIPYTM 493/503, allowing visualization of lipid bodies within the cells.

4.12. Molecular Docking Experiment

The ligand used in this study was optimized and uploaded into AutoDock Tools for molecular docking. The optimized ligand structure was saved in PDBQT format. The protein structure was prepared using AutoDock Tools v1.5.7. Initial preparation involved deleting water molecules from the protein structure. Hydrogen atoms (polar only) were added to the protein structure. Kollman charges were assigned to the protein and the protein structure was saved as a PDBQT file. Regions of interest for ligand binding were determined based on the study by Jiménez-Avalos et al. [25] with minor modifications. Three binding sites were defined: Catalytic/Active (AS) site with grid dimensions set to 35 × 35 × 35 Å and coordinates at −15.117, 14.564, and 67.870; Dimeric Site (DS) with grid dimensions set at 35 × 35 × 35 Å and 1.738, −3.380, 4.457 as coordinates; and Cryptic Site (CS) with grid dimensions set to 35 × 35 × 35 Å and coordinates at 9.104, 12.126, −6.685.
These coordinates were selected to comprehensively cover the active and cryptic regions within the protein’s structure that are most likely to participate in ligand binding. To ensure chemically accurate protonation of the protein target prior to molecular docking, the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro structure (PDB ID: 6YB7) was processed using H++ web-based platform [112], that predicts the pKa values of ionizable residues and assigns their corresponding protonation states at the specified pH. In this study, the pH was set to 7.4 to reflect the physiological conditions under which the protease is active. Under these parameters, H++ automatically adds missing hydrogen atoms and optimizes the hydrogen-bonding network, including appropriate amino acid tautomers, thereby generating a structurally consistent protein model suitable for reliable docking analysis.
The grid spacing was set to 0.5 Å. Molecular docking calculations were performed using AutoDock Vina v.1.5.7 via Microsoft Windows 10 command prompt. The ligand pose with root-mean square deviation (RMSD) of <2.0 Å was then subjected for post-docking analysis to further evaluate the receptor-ligand interactions using BIOVIA Discovery Studio v.2024.
To refine docking results and improve binding affinity estimation, we employed an integrated structure-truncated Molecular Mechanics/Poisson–Boltzmann or Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/PB(GB)SA) rescoring approach, as implemented in the fastDRH webserver [51]. Using the protein-ligand complexes generated via molecular docking using AutoDock Vina v.1.5.7, the top-ranked pose was selected for subsequent rescoring. To improve computational efficiency, the protein structure was truncated to retain only residues within a 12 Å radius of the ligand, preserving the key interactions within the binding site while significantly reducing system size. Molecular mechanics energies were calculated using the AMBER ff14SB force field for proteins. Ligand parameters were assigned using the General AMBER Force Field (GAFF), with partial charges derived via the AM1-BCC method. Binding free energy calculations were performed using the MM/PB(GB)SA method [51], which includes gas-phase molecular mechanics energy and solvation free energy. The latter was calculated using either the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) or Generalized Born (GB) model for the polar component, and the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) model for the non-polar component. Entropic contributions were not included. Ligands were rescored based on their computed binding free energies. A known peptide-based SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitor, peptide-based GC376, and lipid-based alotaketal C analogue 19, was used as the positive control in all docking experiments.

4.13. ADMET Prediction Using ADMETlab 3.0

The absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profiles of selected natural lipids were predicted using ADMETlab version 3.0 (https://admetlab3.scbdd.com/) [113]. The chemical structures of 13 lipid compounds including fatty acids and monoglycerides were drawn or imported as SMILES strings and uploaded to the platform. The Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) probability score was predicted by SwissTarget Prediction [114]. Toxicity predictions encompassed AMES mutagenicity, hepatotoxicity, hERG channel inhibition, and rat oral acute toxicity (LD50). All predictions were conducted under default settings, and results were used to inform the prioritization of lipid compounds for in vitro and in vivo validation.

5. Conclusions

This research emphasizes the promise of sediment-derived Streptomyces as a valuable source of natural lipids that exhibit antiviral properties. Palmitoleic and linoleic acids were clearly identified and showed strong inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro in their purified states. Additional compounds, such as 9-heptadecenoic acid, linolenic acid, 9-HODE, and various monoacylglycerols including aggrecerides A-C, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate, and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate, were tentatively identified using HRMS, tandem MS, NMR, and dereplication analyses.
Molecular docking and MM/GBSA-based rescoring demonstrated that these lipid compounds engage with both the catalytic site of 3CLpro and the dimerization interface, as well as a hidden allosteric pocket. The observed multi-site binding behavior indicates a potential non-competitive or allosteric inhibition mechanism, presenting a viable approach to address the challenges linked to traditional active-site inhibitors.
Our findings indicate that naturally occurring lipids, especially those from marine Streptomyces, could be promising candidates for the development of a new class of 3CLpro inhibitors. Future research will concentrate on confirming the antiviral effectiveness of these compounds using appropriate in vivo cell and animal models. Additionally, it will investigate their formulation potential to enhance pharmacokinetic properties, improve bioavailability, and facilitate therapeutic use. The studies conducted are crucial for converting lipids derived from microbes into potential antiviral drug candidates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph19020294/s1, Table S1. Growth of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T on ISP media. Table S2. Carbon source utilization profile of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Table S3. Nitrogen source utilization profile of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Table S4. Temperature-dependent growth of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Table S5. pH-dependent growth of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Table S6. Salt tolerance of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Table S7. Enzymatic activity profile of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Table S8. Yield distribution of HPLC fractions from DSD454I extract. Table S9. Comparative lipid metabolite profiling of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitory Streptomyces strains. Table S10. Correlation analysis between UV peak areas and 3CLpro inhibitory activity. Table S11. Summary of interacting atoms of lipid metabolites with critical amino acids in the catalytic site of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro as described in the study of Goyal (2020) [24]. Table S12. Summary of interacting atoms of lipid metabolites with amino acids in the dimeric site of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro as described in the study of Goyal (2020) [24] and Jimenez-Avalos et al. (2021) [25]. Table S13. Summary of interacting atoms of lipid metabolites with amino acids in the cryptic site of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro as described in the study of Jimenez-Avalos et al. (2021) [25]. Table S14. Summary of the interaction of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, lipid-based positive control Alotaketal C analogue 19, and peptide-based GC376 against the important interacting amino acid residues. Table S15. Summary of binding affinity (kcal/mol) and GB8 value of 13 fatty acids against the catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic site of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Figure S1. Phylogenetic placement of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. Figure S2. PDA chromatogram of DSD454I fractions (H1–H25). Figure S3. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H17 showing 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9, 9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acid 12, and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoate 13 resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S4. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H18 showing monoacylglycerol profile with palmitoleic acid side chain resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S5. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H19 showing signatures of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9, aggreceride A 10, and linolenic acid 11 resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S6. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H20 showing 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8 and palmitoleic acid resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S7. 1H NMR spectra of bioactive HPLC fraction H21 showing palmitoleic acid 1 and linoleic acid 2 resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S8. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H22 showing aggreceride B 3 and 9-heptadecenoic acid 4 resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S9. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H23 showing aggreceride C 5 and 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate 6 resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S10. 1H NMR spectrum of bioactive HPLC fraction H24 showing hydroxylated fatty acid esters resonance signals (600 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K). Figure S11. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of Palmitoleic acid 1 at m/z 253.2175 [M-H] in DSD454IH20. Figure S12. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of Linoleic acid 2 at m/z 279.2327 [M-H] in DSD454IH21. Figure S13. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of Aggreceride B 3 at m/z 313.2736 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH22. Figure S14. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 9-Heptadecenoic acid 4 at m/z 267.2329 [M-H] in DSD454IH22. Figure S15. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of Aggreceride C 5 at m/z 327.2888 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH23. Figure S16. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate 6 at m/z 355.2831 [M+H]+ in DSD454IH23. Figure S17. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl nonadeca-9,12-dienoate 7 at m/z 369.2999 [M+H]+ in DSD454IH24. Figure S18. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8 at m/z 325.2739 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH20. Figure S19. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9 at m/z 311.2588 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH17. Figure S20. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of Aggreceride A 10 at m/z 299.2581 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH19. Figure S21. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of Linolenic acid 11 at m/z 277.2168 [M-H] in DSD454IH19. Figure S22. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 9-HODE 12 at m/z 279.2330 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH17. Figure S23. High Resolution Mass Spectrum (HRMS) of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoate 13 at m/z 297.2434 [M+H-H2O]+ in DSD454IH17. Figure S24. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of aggreceride B 3 at m/z 331.30 [M+H]+. Figure S25. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 9-heptadecenoic acid 4 at m/z 269.30 [M+H]+. Figure S26. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of aggreceride C 5 at m/z 345.35 [M+H]+. Figure S27. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate 6 at m/z 355.35 [M+H]+. Figure S28. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl nonadeca-9,12-dienoate 7 at m/z 369.30 [M+H]+. Figure S29. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate 8 at m/z 343.25 [M+H]+. Figure S30. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate 9 at m/z 329.25 [M+H]+. Figure S31. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of aggreceride A 10 at m/z 317.30 [M+H]+. Figure S32. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of linolenic acid 11 at m/z 279.25 [M+H]+. Figure S33. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 9-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acid 12 at m/z 297.25 [M+H]+. Figure S34. MS/MS fragmentation spectrum with proposed fragment structure of 2,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoate 13 at m/z 315.25 [M+H]+. Figure S35. SARS-CoV-2 CLpro inhibition of hexane-soluble metabolites from DSD149T, DSD735T, DSD2893T, and DSD2604T. Figure S36. Binding Interactions of lipid metabolites on SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro catalytic site. Figure S37. Binding Interactions of lipid metabolites on SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro dimeric site. Figure S38. Binding Interactions of lipid metabolites on SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro cryptic site.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.D.; methodology, D.S.D., J.C.M., J.J.R.T. and L.S.d.G.; software, N.B.J.M.M.; validation, D.S.D., J.C.M., J.J.R.T. and L.S.d.G.; formal analysis, J.C.M., J.J.R.T., L.S.d.G. and N.B.J.M.M.; investigation, J.C.M., J.J.R.T., L.S.d.G., D.P.C.C. and L.A.P.B.; resources, D.S.D.; data curation, J.C.M., J.J.R.T. and L.S.d.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.M., J.J.R.T., L.S.d.G. and N.B.J.M.M.; writing—review and editing, D.S.D., J.C.M., J.J.R.T., L.S.d.G., N.B.J.M.M., D.P.C.C., L.A.P.B. and J.A.J.; visualization, J.C.M., J.J.R.T., L.S.d.G., N.B.J.M.M. and D.P.C.C.; supervision, D.S.D. and J.A.J.; project administration, D.S.D.; funding acquisition, D.S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project is supported by a grant from the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) to DS Dalisay and monitored by the DOST National Research Council of the Philippines (NRCP). The instruments utilized in this study were procured through a grant from the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (DOST-PCHRD) under the Tuklas Lunas Program. DS Dalisay’s graduate scholarship is supported by the DOST Science Education Institute (DOST-SEI) through the STRAND Program and the University of San Agustin HRD Program.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. The gene sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database and are publicly accessible under the following accession numbers: PV771072, PV771073, and PV771074. (accessible date: 17 June 2025).

Acknowledgments

The Tubbataha Protected Area Management Board (TPAMB Resolution 18-01) and Palawan Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD) are acknowledged for the permit to collect in Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park. The Tubbataha Management Office (TMO), headed by Angelique Songco, and the local government of Cagayancillo, Palawan, Philippines, are also acknowledged for their support during sample collection. We thank David Choy and the crew of M/Y Palausport Philippines for the expedition vessel in Tubbataha. Also, the Local Government Unit of Anini-y, Antique is acknowledged for the permit to collect samples in Nogas Island. We also thank the SCUBATECH diving team of Julius Tagomata, Francis Jose, and Keane Landoy for their technical assistance. Mary Grace Clemente and Benjie Velado are gratefully acknowledged for their administrative support during the implementation of the project. Finally, we extend our sincere thanks to the University of San Agustin Center for Advanced New Materials, Engineering, and Emerging Technologies (CANMEET) for access to the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) facility. We sincerely thank Rainphil Inc. for generously allowing us to use the Bioer Line Gene 9600 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Hangzhou, China) for our 16S rRNA gene amplification. ChatGPT-4.0 was used during the preparation of this manuscript to help improve clarity, coherence, and readability. The author(s) carefully reviewed and edited all AI-assisted content to ensure accuracy and integrity, and they take full responsibility for the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

3CLpro3-Chymotrypsin-like protease (main protease of SARS-CoV-2)
ADMETAbsorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity
BODIPYTM 493/503Boron-dipyrromethene (fluorescent dye)
COVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019
CYPCytochrome P450
FRETFörster Resonance Energy Transfer
GBSAGeneralized Born Surface Area
HRMSHigh-Resolution Mass Spectrometry
IC50Half-maximal inhibitory concentration
LC–MSLiquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
LC–MS/MSLiquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
MM/GBSAMolecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area
NMRNuclear Magnetic Resonance
PDBProtein Data Bank
RdRpRNA-dependent RNA polymerase
TPSATopological Polar Surface Area

References

  1. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Romano, M.; Ruggiero, A.; Squeglia, F.; Maga, G.; Berisio, R. A Structural View of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Replication Machinery: RNA Synthesis, Proofreading and Final Capping. Cells 2020, 9, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Guo, D. Emerging Coronaviruses: Genome Structure, Replication, and Pathogenesis. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jahirul Islam, M.; Nawal Islam, N.; Siddik Alom, M.; Kabir, M.; Halim, M.A. A review on structural, non-structural, and accessory proteins of SARS-CoV-2: Highlighting drug target sites. Immunobiology 2023, 228, 152302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perlman, S.; Netland, J. Coronaviruses Post-SARS: Update on Replication and Pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Al Adem, K.; Ferreira, J.C.; Villanueva, A.J.; Fadl, S.; El-Sadaany, F.; Masmoudi, I.; Gidiya, Y.; Gurudza, T.; Cardoso, T.H.S.; Saksena, N.K.; et al. 3-chymotrypsin-lik protease in SARS-CoV-2. Biosci. Rep. 2024, 44, BSR20231395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krichel, B.; Falke, S.; Hilgenfeld, R.; Redecke, L.; Uetrecht, C. Processing of the SARS-CoV pp1a/ab nsp7-10 region. Biochem. J. 2020, 477, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shin, D.; Mukherjee, R.; Grewe, D.; Bojkova, D.; Baek, K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Schulz, L.; Widera, M.; Mehdipour, A.R.; Tascher, G.; et al. Papain-like protease regulates SARS-CoV-2 viral spread and innate immunity. Nature 2020, 587, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Osipiuk, J.; Azizi, S.A.; Dvorkin, S.; Endres, M.; Jedrzejczak, R.; Jones, K.A.; Kang, S.; Kathayat, R.S.; Kim, Y.; Lisnyak, V.G.; et al. Structure of papain-like protease from SARS-CoV-2 and its complexes with non-covalent inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, W.; Xu, M.; Chen, C.Z.; Guo, H.; Shen, M.; Hu, X.; Shinn, P.; Klumpp-Thomas, C.; Michael, S.G.; Zheng, W. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease Inhibitors by a Quantitative High-Throughput Screening. bioRxiv 2020, 7, 207019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, G.H.; Zhang, Y.N.; Zhang, Y.W.; Huang, P.; Ge, G.B. The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro): Structure, function, and emerging therapies for COVID-19. MedComm 2022, 3, e151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, S.; Wu, G. Spatial and temporal roles of SARS-CoV PLpro-A snapshot. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yuan, S.; Gao, X.; Tang, K.; Cai, J.P.; Hu, M.; Luo, P.; Wen, L.; Ye, Z.W.; Luo, C.; Tsang, J.O.; et al. Targeting papain-like protease for broad-spectrum coronavirus inhibition. Protein Cell 2022, 13, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Amin, S.A.; Banerjee, S.; Ghosh, K.; Gayen, S.; Jha, T. Protease targeted COVID-19 drug discovery and its challenges: Insight into viral main protease (Mpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2021, 29, 115860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, C.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Zou, X.; Zeng, X.; Wang, J.; Zeng, P.; Li, W.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; et al. Structural Basis for Coronaviral Main Proteases Inhibition by the 3CLpro Inhibitor GC376. J. Mol. Biol. 2024, 436, 168474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuang, Y.; Ma, X.; Shen, W.; Rao, Q.; Yang, S. Discovery of 3CLpro inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Future Sci. OA 2023, 9, FSO853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhong, N.; Zhang, S.; Xue, F.; Kang, X.; Zou, P.; Chen, J.; Liang, C.; Rao, Z.; Jin, C.; Lou, Z.; et al. C-terminal domain of SARS-CoV main protease can form a 3D domain-swapped dimer. Protein Sci. 2009, 18, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.; Yang, M.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lou, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, L.; Mo, L.; Ye, S.; Pang, H.; et al. The crystal structures of severe acute respiratory syndrome virus main protease and its complex with an inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13190–13195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amorim, V.M.F.; Soares, E.P.; Ferrari, A.S.A.; Merighi, D.G.S.; de Souza, R.F.; Guzzo, C.R.; Souza, A.S. 3-Chymotrypsin-like Protease (3CLpro) of SARS-CoV-2: Validation as a Molecular Target, Proposal of a Novel Catalytic Mechanism, and Inhibitors in Preclinical and Clinical Trials. Viruses 2024, 16, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhong, N.; Zhang, S.; Zou, P.; Chen, J.; Kang, X.; Li, Z.; Liang, C.; Jin, C.; Xia, B. Without its N-finger, the main protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus can form a novel dimer through its C-terminal domain. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 4227–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, S.C.; Chang, G.G.; Chou, C.Y. Mutation of Glu-166 blocks the substrate-induced dimerization of SARS coronavirus main protease. Biophys. J. 2010, 98, 1327–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shi, J.; Wei, Z.; Song, J. Dissection study on the severe acute respiratory syndrome 3C-like protease reveals the critical role of the extra domain in dimerization of the enzyme: Defining the extra domain as a new target for design of highly specific protease inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 24765–24773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jin, Z.; Du, X.; Xu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, C.; et al. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 2020, 582, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Goyal, B.; Goyal, D. Targeting the Dimerization of the Main Protease of Coronaviruses: A Potential Broad-Spectrum Therapeutic Strategy. ACS Comb. Sci. 2020, 22, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiménez-Avalos, G.; Vargas-Ruiz, A.P.; Delgado-Pease, N.E.; Olivos-Ramirez, G.E.; Sheen, P.; Fernández-Díaz, M.; Quiliano, M.; Zimic, M. COVID-19 Working Group in Perú. Comprehensive virtual screening of 4.8 k flavonoids reveals novel insights into allosteric inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 MPRO. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silva, J.R.A.; Kruger, H.G.; Molfetta, F.A. Drug repurposing and computational modeling for discovery of inhibitors of the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 23450–23458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ElSawy, K.M. Competitive Interaction of the SGFRKMAF Peptide with 3CLpro Dimerization Intermediates: A Brownian Dynamics Investigation. J. Phys. Chem. 2024, 128, 7313–7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sztain, T.; Amaro, R.; McCammon, J.A. Elucidation of Cryptic and Allosteric Pockets within the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 61, 3495–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferreira, J.C.; Fadl, S.; Rabeh, W.M. Key dimer interface residues impact the catalytic activity of 3CLpro, the main protease of SARS-CoV-2. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhat, Z.A.; Chitara, D.; Iqbal, J.; Sanjeev, B.S.; Madhumalar, A. Targeting allosteric pockets of SARS-CoV-2 main protease Mpro. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 6603–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Günther, S.; Reinke, P.Y.A.; Fernández-García, Y.; Lieske, J.; Lane, T.J.; Ginn, H.M.; Koua, F.H.M.; Ehrt, C.; Ewert, W.; Oberthuer, D.; et al. X-ray screening identifies active site and allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Science 2021, 372, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mercorelli, B.; Bazzacco, A.; Eleuteri, M.; Di Cristofano, S.; Desantis, J.; Paciaroni, A.; Ortore, M.G.; Tuci, S.; Spinozzi, F.; Raimondo, D.; et al. Novel SARS-CoV-2 allosteric inhibitors that destabilize the Main Protease Mpro dimer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 319, 145162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Singh, A.; Jangid, K.; Nehul, S.; Dhaka, P.; Rani, R.; Pareek, A.; Sharma, G.K.; Kumar, P.; Tomar, S. Structural and Mechanistic Insights into the Main Protease (Mpro) Dimer Interface Destabilization Inhibitor: Unveiling New Therapeutic Avenues against SARS-CoV-2. Biochemistry 2025, 64, 1589–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bono, A.; Lauria, A.; La Monica, G.; Alamia, F.; Mingoia, F.; Martorana, A. In Silico Design of New Dual Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 MPRO through Ligand- and Structure-Based Methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silvestrini, L.; Belhaj, N.; Comez, L.; Gerelli, Y.; Lauria, A.; Libera, V.; Mariani, P.; Marzullo, P.; Ortore, M.G.; Palumbo Piccionello, A.; et al. The dimer-monomer equilibrium of SARS-CoV-2 main protease is affected by small molecule inhibitors. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, F.; Liu, D.; Gao, D.; Yuan, J.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Cen, Y.; Lin, G.Q.; Zhao, J.; Tian, P. Discovery of natural catechol derivatives as covalent SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pennisi, R.; Gentile, D.; Rescifina, A.; Napoli, E.; Trischitta, P.; Piperno, A.; Sciortino, M.T. An Integrated In Silico and In Vitro Approach for the Identification of Natural Products Active against SARS-CoV-2. Biomolecules 2023, 14, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shamim, S.; Akhtar, M.; Gul, S. Novel designed analogues of quercetin against SARS-CoV2:an in-silico pharmacokinetic evaluation, molecular modeling, MD simulations based study. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2024, 42, 11773–11791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Omar, R.; Abd El-Salam, M.; Elsbaey, M.; Hassan, M. Fourteen immunomodulatory alkaloids and two prenylated phenylpropanoids with dual therapeutic approach for COVID-19: Molecular docking and dynamics studies. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2024, 42, 2298–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Akter, Y.; Barua, R.; Nasir Uddin, M.; Muhammad Sanaullah, A.F.; Marzan, L.W. Bioactive potentiality of secondary metabolites from endophytic bacteria against SARS-CoV-2: An in-silico approach. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0269962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Namiranian, P.; Sadatpour, O.; Azimzadeh Jamalkandi, S.; Hossein Ayati, M.; Karimi, M. Antiviral Activity of Medicinal Plants against Human Coronavirus: A systematic scoping review of and experimentations. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2022, 42, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Melinda, Y.N.; Widada, J.; Wahyuningsih, T.D.; Febriansah, R.; Damayanti, E.; Mustofa, M. Metabologenomics approach to the discovery of novel compounds from Streptomyces sp. GMR22 as anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Al-Bustany, H.A.; Ercan, S.; Ince, E.; Pirinccioglu, N. Investigation of angucycline compounds as potential drug candidates against SARS-CoV-2 main protease using docking and molecular dynamic approaches. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tarasova, E.V.; Luchnikova, N.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Actinomycetes as Producers of Biologically Active Terpenoids: Current Trends and Patents. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Lu, Q.; Cryle, M.J.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, F. Structural diversity, biosynthesis, and biological functions of lipopeptides from Streptomyces. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2023, 40, 557–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barbuto Ferraiuolo, S.; Cammarota, M.; Schiraldi, C.; Restaino, O.F. Streptomycetes as platform for biotechnological production processes of drugs. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 551–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alvarez, H.; Steinbüchel, A. Triacylglycerols in prokaryotic microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 60, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dalisay, D.S.; Mateo, J.C.; Teodosio, J.J.R.; Jusa, L.M.S.; Baladjay, D.M.S.; de Guzman, L.S.; Balida, L.A.P.; Jamal, J.A. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Inhibitors from Marine Actinomycetes through Integrated Phylogeny-Based Metabolomics with Functional Screening and Bioinformatic Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 41503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koulgi, S.; Jani, V.; Uppuladinne, M.; Sonavane, U.; Nath, A.K.; Darbari, H.; Joshi, R. Drug repurposing studies targeting SARS-CoV-2: An ensemble docking approach on drug target 3C-like protease (3CLpro). J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 5735–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Blagojevic, P.; Perez-Vargas, J.; Jian, K.; Williams, D.E.; Villanueva, I.; Thompson, C.A.H.; Ennis, S.; Niikura, M.; Tietjen, I.; Jean, F.; et al. Synthetic Analogs of the Sponge Sesterterpenoid Alotaketal C are Potent Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 Infections of Human Lung Cells. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 4825–4829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Z.; Pan, H.; Sun, H.; Kang, Y.; Liu, H.; Cao, D.; Hou, T. fastDRH: A webserver to predict and analyze protein–ligand complexes based on molecular docking and MM/PB (GB) SA computation. Brief. Bioinform. 2022, 23, bbac201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Barka, E.A.; Vatsa, P.; Sanchez, L.; Gaveau-Vaillant, N.; Jacquard, C.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Klenk, H.P.; Clément, C.; Ouhdouch, Y.; van Wezel, G.P. Taxonomy, Physiology, and Natural Products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2015, 80, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Suryawanshi, R.K.; Koujah, L.; Patil, C.D.; Ames, J.M.; Agelidis, A.; Yadavalli, T.; Patil, S.V.; Shukla, D. Bacterial Pigment Prodigiosin Demonstrates a Unique Antiherpesvirus Activity That Is Mediated Through Inhibition of Prosurvival Signal Transducers. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00251-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stankovic, N.; Radulovic, V.; Petkovic, M.; Vuckovic, I.; Jadranin, M.; Vasiljevic, B.; Nikodinovic-Runic, J. Streptomyces sp. JS520 produces exceptionally high quantities of undecylprodigiosin with antibacterial, antioxidative, and UV-protective properties. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 1217–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kordjazi, T.; Mariniello, L.; Giosafatto, C.V.L.; Porta, R.; Restaino, O.F. Streptomycetes as Microbial Cell Factories for the Biotechnological Production of Melanin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bush, M.J.; Tschowri, N.; Schlimpert, S.; Flärdh, K.; Buttner, M.J. c-di-GMP signalling and the regulation of developmental transitions in streptomycetes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bush, M.J.; Casu, B.; Schlimpert, S. Dividing lines: Compartmentalisation and division in Streptomyces. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2025, 85, 102611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jakimowicz, D.; van Wezel, G.P. Cell division and DNA segregation in Streptomyces: How to build a septum in the middle of nowhere? Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 85, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hemeda, N.A.; Hegazy, G.E.; Abdelgalil, S.A.; Soliman, N.A.; Abdel-Meguid, D.I.; El-Assar, S.A. Maximization of red pigment production from Streptomyces sp. LS1 structure elucidation and application as antimicrobial/antifouling against human pathogens and marine microbes. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sayed, G.H.E.; Fadel, M.; Fouad, R.; Ahmed, H.M.; Hamed, A.A. Improving natural red pigment production by Streptomyces phaeolivaceus strain GH27 for functionalization of textiles with in silico ADME prediction. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Finger, M.; Sentek, F.; Hartmann, L.; Palacio-Barrera, A.M.; Schlembach, I.; Rosenbaum, M.A.; Büchs, J. Insights into Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) growth and pigment formation with high-throughput online monitoring. Eng. Life Sci. 2022, 23, e2100151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Miller, J.I.; Techtmann, S.; Joyner, D.; Mahmoudi, N.; Fortney, J.; Fordyce, J.A.; GaraJayeva, N.; Askerov, F.S.; Cravid, C.; Kuijper, M.; et al. Microbial Communities across Global Marine Basins Show Important Compositional Similarities by Depth. mBio 2020, 11, e01448-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Prins, A.; Dyani, S.S.; Vreulink, J.M.; Maldonado, L.A.; Le Roes-Hill, M. Actinobacteria diversity associated with marine sediments and a wetland system, Agulhas-South Africa. Ann. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Das, S.; Lyla, P.S.; Ajmal Khan, S. Distribution and generic composition of culturable marine actinomycetes from the sediments of Indian continental slope of Bay of Bengal. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2008, 26, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Librán-Pérez, M.; Pereiro, P.; Figueras, A.; Novoa, B. Antiviral activity of palmitic acid via autophagic flux inhibition in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2019, 95, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Feng, Y.; Qiu, S.; Zou, S.; Li, R.; Chen, H.; Chen, K.; Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Lai, X.; Liu, S.; et al. Antiviral activity of eicosapentaenoic acid against zika virus and other enveloped viruses. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1564504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Matos-Hernández, M.L.; Samples, R.; Dyer, G.; Casimir Montán, V.M.; Morales-Colón, C.A.; Salvino, J.M.; Montaner, L.J.; Cassel, J.A.; Messick, T.E.; Tietjen, I.; et al. Metabolomic Analysis and Antiviral Screening of a Marine Algae Library Yield Jobosic Acid (2,5-Dimethyltetradecanoic Acid) as a Selective Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2. J. Nat. Prod. 2024, 87, 1513–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. McGill, A.R.; Markoutsa, E.; Mayilsamy, K.; Green, R.; Sivakumar, K.; Mohapatra, S.; Mohapatra, S.S. Acetate-Encapsulated Linolenic Acid Liposomes Reduce SARS-CoV-2 and RSV Infection. Viruses 2023, 15, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gago, G.; Diacovich, L.; Arabolaza, A.; Tsai, S.C.; Gramajo, H. Fatty acid biosynthesis in actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 475–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gago, G.; Arabolaza, A.; Gramajo, H. Components and Key Regulatory Steps of Lipid Biosynthesis in Actinomycetes. In Biogenesis of Fatty Acids, Lipids and Membranes; Geiger, O., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 409–433. [Google Scholar]
  71. Apriliana, P.; Kahar, P.; Rachmadona, N.; Restu, W.K.; Kondo, A.; Ogino, C. Lipid production in Streptomyces jeddahensis is enhanced by glucose and fatty acid derivatives, with temperature variations influencing gene expression and biosynthesis. Fermentation 2025, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Han, L.; Lobo, S.; Reynolds, K.A. Characterization of beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III from Streptomyces glaucescens and its role in initiation of fatty acid biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 4481–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ma, J.R.; Lin, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.B.; Ni, X.P.; Yu, Y.H. SCO6564, a novel 3-ketoacyl acyl carrier protein synthase III, contributes in fatty acid synthesis in Streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0318258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cronan, J.E.; Thomas, J. Bacterial fatty acid synthesis and its relationships with polyketide synthetic pathways. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 459, 395–433. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Garay, L.A.; Boundy-Mills, K.L.; German, J.B. Accumulation of high-value lipids in single-cell microorganisms: A mechanistic approach and future perspectives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 2709–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kwon, H.J.; Hwang, S.E.; Han, J.T.; Kim, C.J.; Rho, J.R.; Shin, J. Production of oleamide, a functional lipid, by Streptomyces sp. KK90378. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 11, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tanvir, R.; Sajid, I.; Rehman, Y.; Hasnain, S. Fatty acid based antimicrobials from Streptomyces sp. SORS-24, an endophyte isolated from Sonchus oleraceus. Lett Appl Microbiol 2023, 76, ovad080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schneider, O.; Ilic-Tomic, T.; Rückert, C.; Kalinowski, J.; Genčić, M.S.; Živković, M.Z.; Stankovic, N.; Radulović, N.S.; Vasiljevic, B.; Nikodinovic-Runic, J.; et al. Genomics-Based Insights into the Biosynthesis and Unusually High Accumulation of Free Fatty Acids by Streptomyces sp. NP10. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Martín, J.F.; Sola-Landa, A.; Santos-Beneit, F.; Fernández-Martínez, L.T.; Prieto, C.; Rodríguez-García, A. Cross-talk of global nutritional regulators in the control of primary and secondary metabolism in Streptomyces. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011, 4, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Heredia-Arroyo, T.; Wei, W.; Hu, B. Oil accumulation via heterotrophic/mixotrophic Chlorella protothecoides. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 1978–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kitahara, T.; Aono, S.; Mori, K. Synthesis of both the enantiomers of aseanostatin P5 (sarcinic acid), an inhibitor of myeloperoxidase release, and four diastereomers of aggreceride A, a platelet aggregation inhibitor. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1995, 59, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Omura, S.; Nakagawa, A.; Fukamachi, N.; Otoguro, K.; Kobayashi, B. Aggreceride, a new platelet aggregation inhibitor from Streptomyces. J. Antibiot. 1986, 39, 1180–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kalscheuer, R.; Steinbüchel, A. A novel bifunctional wax ester synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase mediates wax ester and triacylglycerol biosynthesis in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus ADP1. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 8075–8082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. van Meer, G.; Voelker, D.R.; Feigenson, G.W. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sandoval-Calderón, M.; Guan, Z.; Sohlenkamp, C. Knowns and unknowns of membrane lipid synthesis in streptomycetes. Biochim. 2017, 141, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Nomura, D.K.; Long, J.Z.; Niessen, S.; Hoover, H.S.; Ng, S.W.; Cravatt, B.F. Monoacylglycerol lipase regulates a fatty acid network that promotes cancer pathogenesis. Cell 2010, 140, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Menendez-Bravo, S.; Paganini, J.; Avignone-Rossa, C.; Gramajo, H.; Arabolaza, A. Identification of FadAB Complexes Involved in Fatty Acid β-Oxidation in Streptomyces coelicolor and Construction of a Triacylglycerol Overproducing strain. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhandari, S.; Bisht, K.S.; Merkler, D.J. The Biosynthesis and Metabolism of the N-Acylated Aromatic Amino Acids: N-Acylphenylalanine, N-Acyltyrosine, N-Acyltryptophan, and N-Acylhistidine. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 8, 801749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Celler, K.; Koning, R.I.; Willemse, J.; Koster, A.J.; van Wezel, G.P. Cross-membranes orchestrate compartmentalization and morphogenesis in Streptomyces. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Toelzer, C.; Gupta, K.; Berger, I.; Schaffitzel, C. Cryo-EM reveals binding of linoleic acid to SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, suggesting an antiviral treatment strategy. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2023, 79, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Toelzer, C.; Gupta, K.; Yadav, S.K.N.; Borucu, U.; Davidson, A.D.; Kavanagh Williamson, M.; Shoemark, D.K.; Garzoni, F.; Staufer, O.; Milligan, R.; et al. Free fatty acid binding pocket in the locked structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 2020, 370, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xu, R.; Molenaar, A.J.; Chen, Z.; Yuan, Y. Mode and Mechanism of Action of Omega-3 and Omega-6 Unsaturated Fatty Acids in Chronic Diseases. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vieira, C.P.; Lelis, C.A.; Ochioni, A.C.; Rosário, D.K.A.; Rosario, I.L.S.; Vieira, I.R.S.; Carvalho, A.P.A.; Janeiro, J.M.; da Costa, M.P.; Lima, F.R.S.; et al. Estimating the therapeutic potential of NSAIDs and linoleic acid-isomers supplementation against neuroinflammation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 177, 116884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Muenks, A.; Zepeda, S.; Zhou, G.; Veesler, D.; DiMaio, F. Automatic and accurate ligand structure determination guided by cryo-electron microscopy maps. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Vivar-Sierra, A.; Araiza-Macías, M.J.; Hernández-Contreras, J.P.; Vergara-Castañeda, A.; Ramírez-Vélez, G.; Pinto-Almazán, R.; Salazar, J.R.; Loza-Mejía, M.A. In Silico Study of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids as Potential SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Closed Conformation Stabilizers: Epidemiological and Computational Approaches. Molecules 2021, 26, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Goc, A.; Sumera, W.; Rath, M.; Niedzwiecki, A. Linoleic acid binds to SARS-CoV-2 RdRp and represses replication of seasonal human coronavirus OC43. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Goc, A.; Niedzwiecki, A.; Rath, M. Polyunsaturated ω-3 fatty acids inhibit ACE2-controlled SARS-CoV-2 binding and cellular entry. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kuzmanic, A.; Bowman, G.R.; Juarez-Jimenez, J.; Michel, J.; Gervasio, F.L. Investigating Cryptic Binding Sites by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sabido, E.M.; Tenebro, C.P.; Trono, D.J.V.L.; Vicera, C.V.B.; Leonida, S.F.L.; Maybay, J.J.W.B.; Reyes-Salarda, R.; Amago, D.S.; Aguadera, A.M.V.; Octaviano, M.C.; et al. Insights into the Variation in Bioactivities of Closely Related Streptomyces Strains from Marine Sediments of the Visayan Sea Against ESKAPE and Ovarian Cancer. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tenebro, C.P.; Trono, D.J.V.L.; Vicera, C.V.B.; Sabido, E.M.; Ysulat, J.A., Jr.; Macaspac, A.J.M.; Tampus, K.A.; Fabrigar, T.A.P.; Saludes, J.P.; Dalisay, D.S. Multiple strain analysis of Streptomyces species from Philippine marine sediments reveals intraspecies heterogeneity in antibiotic activities. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sabido, E.M.; Tenebro, C.P.; Suarez, A.F.L.; Ong, S.D.C.; Trono, D.J.V.L.; Amago, D.S.; Evangelista, J.E., Jr.; Reynoso, A.M.Q.; Villalobos, I.G.M.; Alit, L.D.D.; et al. Marine Sediment-Derived Streptomyces Strain Produces Angucycline Antibiotics Against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Harboring SCCmec Type 1 Gene. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Paderog, M.J.V.; Suarez, A.F.L.; Sabido, E.M.; Low, Z.J.; Saludes, J.P.; Dalisay, D.S. Anthracycline Shunt Metabolites from Philippine Marine Sediment-Derived Streptomyces Destroy Cell Membrane Integrity of Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tenebro, C.P.; Trono, D.J.V.L.; Balida, L.A.P.; Bayog, L.K.A.; Bruna, J.R.; Sabido, E.M.; Caspe, D.P.C.; de Los Santos, E.L.C.; Saludes, J.P.; Dalisay, D.S. Synergy Between Genome Mining, Metabolomics, and Bioinformatics Uncovers Antibacterial Chlorinated Carbazole Alkaloids and Their Biosynthetic Gene Cluster from Streptomyces tubbatahanensis sp. nov., a Novel Actinomycete Isolated from Sulu Sea, Philippines. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e03661-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kimura, M.A. Simple Method for Estimating Evolutionary Rates of Base Substitutions Through Comparative Studies of Nucleotide Sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, M.; Carver, J.J.; Phelan, V.V.; Sanchez, L.M.; Garg, N.; Peng, Y.; Nguyen, D.D.; Watrous, J.; Kapono, C.A.; Luzzatto-Knaan, T.; et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, S.; Chen, J.; Cheng, T.; Gindulyte, A.; He, J.; He, S.; Li, Q.; Shoemaker, B.A.; Thiessen, P.A.; Yu, B.; et al. PubChem in 2021: New data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D1388–D1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Feng, Y.; Qaseem, A.; Moumbock, A.F.A.; Pan, S.; Kirchner, P.A.; Simoben, C.V.; Malange, Y.I.; Babiaka, S.B.; Gao, M.; Günther, S. StreptomeDB 4.0: A comprehensive database of streptomycetes natural products enriched with protein interactions and interactive spectral visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D724–D729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, F.; Allen, D.; Tian, S.; Oler, E.; Gautam, V.; Greiner, R.; Metz, T.O.; Wishart, D.S. CFM-ID 4.0—A web server for accurate MS-based metabolite identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W165–W174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lu, J.; Chen, X.; Huang, P.; Xu, H.; Yu, Z.; Yao, X. Crystallization of Feline Coronavirus Mpro with GC376 Reveals Mechanism of Inhibition. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 852210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dey-Rao, R.; Sinha, S.; Paul, S.; Mitra, D.; Banerjee, A.K. A Fluorescence-Based, Gain-of-Signal, Live Cell System to Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibition. Antivir. Res. 2021, 195, 105183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gordon, J.C.; Myers, J.B.; Folta, T.; Shoja, V.; Heath, L.S.; Onufriev, A. H++: A server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W368–W371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Xiong, G.; Wu, Z.; Yi, J.; Fu, L.; Yang, Z.; Hsieh, C.; Yin, M.; Zeng, X.; Wu, C.; Lu, A.; et al. ADMETlab 2.0: An Integrated Online Platform for Accurate and Comprehensive Predictions of ADMET Properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W5–W14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissTargetPrediction: Updated Data and New Features for Efficient Prediction of Protein Targets of Small Molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W357–W364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural classes of non-catalytic SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors grouped according to binding site and mechanistic effect. Peptidomimetic carboxamides (blue panel) interact with an allosteric pocket located between Domains II and III and shift the protease equilibrium toward the inactive monomeric state (1, 11). Repurposed drugs such as minocycline, bexarotene, WIN-62577, and KT-185 (green panel), bind an allosteric site at the dimer interface, displacing the Lys236-Tyr239 α-helix and weakening dimer stability. Benzo[b]thiophene and benzo[b]furan derivatives (pink panel; compounds 1b, 1c, and 2i) exhibit dual-site affinity for the catalytic vicinity and the Domain II-III dimerization pocket. Fluorinated 1,2,4-oxadiazoles (peach panel; compounds 3, 5, and 7) act as interface modulators that alter the monomer-dimer equilibrium and impact 3CLpro proteolytic function. Note: All compound names and numbers in the figure are presented exactly as reported in the original papers cited [32,33,34,35].
Figure 1. Structural classes of non-catalytic SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors grouped according to binding site and mechanistic effect. Peptidomimetic carboxamides (blue panel) interact with an allosteric pocket located between Domains II and III and shift the protease equilibrium toward the inactive monomeric state (1, 11). Repurposed drugs such as minocycline, bexarotene, WIN-62577, and KT-185 (green panel), bind an allosteric site at the dimer interface, displacing the Lys236-Tyr239 α-helix and weakening dimer stability. Benzo[b]thiophene and benzo[b]furan derivatives (pink panel; compounds 1b, 1c, and 2i) exhibit dual-site affinity for the catalytic vicinity and the Domain II-III dimerization pocket. Fluorinated 1,2,4-oxadiazoles (peach panel; compounds 3, 5, and 7) act as interface modulators that alter the monomer-dimer equilibrium and impact 3CLpro proteolytic function. Note: All compound names and numbers in the figure are presented exactly as reported in the original papers cited [32,33,34,35].
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g001
Figure 2. Morphological and physiological characterization of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. (AC) Colony morphology and ultrastructure of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T grown on MM1 agar and visualized by scanning electron microscopy (magnification = 5000× and 10,000×). (DI) Growth of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T under varying nutritional and environmental conditions, including different media (D), carbon sources (E), nitrogen sources (F), temperatures (G), pH levels (H), and NaCl concentrations (I).
Figure 2. Morphological and physiological characterization of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T. (AC) Colony morphology and ultrastructure of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T grown on MM1 agar and visualized by scanning electron microscopy (magnification = 5000× and 10,000×). (DI) Growth of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T under varying nutritional and environmental conditions, including different media (D), carbon sources (E), nitrogen sources (F), temperatures (G), pH levels (H), and NaCl concentrations (I).
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g002
Figure 3. Inhibitory activity of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T HPLC fractions against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Fractions H1B–H25 obtained from HPLC fractionation of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T extract were evaluated for their ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro using a FRET-based enzymatic assay. A positive control GC376 (green) and a negative control H2O (red) were included, alongside the crude extract DSD454I (dark blue). Fractions were color-coded by activity group for visualization. Error bars represent standard deviation across three independent experiments performed in triplicate. HPLC fractions with >50% and 90% inhibition (red broken line) of 3CLpro activity were identified as hits.
Figure 3. Inhibitory activity of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T HPLC fractions against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Fractions H1B–H25 obtained from HPLC fractionation of Streptomyces sp. DSD454T extract were evaluated for their ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro using a FRET-based enzymatic assay. A positive control GC376 (green) and a negative control H2O (red) were included, alongside the crude extract DSD454I (dark blue). Fractions were color-coded by activity group for visualization. Error bars represent standard deviation across three independent experiments performed in triplicate. HPLC fractions with >50% and 90% inhibition (red broken line) of 3CLpro activity were identified as hits.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g003
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectral analysis of bioactive HPLC fractions DSD454 H17–H24. Stacked 1H NMR spectra of HPLC-purified fractions DSD454 H17–H24 acquired in CDCl3 at 298 K and 600 MHz on a Bruker Avance® NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a 5 mm triple resonance cryoprobe. Spectra were analyzed for resonance features indicative of lipidic structures in fractions exhibiting SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitory activity.
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectral analysis of bioactive HPLC fractions DSD454 H17–H24. Stacked 1H NMR spectra of HPLC-purified fractions DSD454 H17–H24 acquired in CDCl3 at 298 K and 600 MHz on a Bruker Avance® NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a 5 mm triple resonance cryoprobe. Spectra were analyzed for resonance features indicative of lipidic structures in fractions exhibiting SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitory activity.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g004
Figure 5. Chromatographic, mass spectrometric, and quantitative validation of palmitoleic acid 1 and linoleic acid 2 in bioactive Fraction H21. (A) Overlay of UV absorbance and chromatographic retention profiles of Fraction H21 with analytical standards of palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid. (B) MS of palmitoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. (C) MS/MS spectra of palmitoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. The fragmentation is color-coded according to their corresponding m/z peaks. (D) MS of linoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. (E) MS/MS spectra of linoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. The fragmentation is color-coded according to their corresponding m/z peaks. (F) Quantitative analysis of the UV chromatogram for Fraction H21 showing integrated peak areas corresponding to palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid based on relative abundance. (G) IC50 inhibition of palmitoleic acid against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. (H) IC50 inhibition of linoleic acid against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro.
Figure 5. Chromatographic, mass spectrometric, and quantitative validation of palmitoleic acid 1 and linoleic acid 2 in bioactive Fraction H21. (A) Overlay of UV absorbance and chromatographic retention profiles of Fraction H21 with analytical standards of palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid. (B) MS of palmitoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. (C) MS/MS spectra of palmitoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. The fragmentation is color-coded according to their corresponding m/z peaks. (D) MS of linoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. (E) MS/MS spectra of linoleic acid from Fraction H21 and reference standard. The fragmentation is color-coded according to their corresponding m/z peaks. (F) Quantitative analysis of the UV chromatogram for Fraction H21 showing integrated peak areas corresponding to palmitoleic acid and linoleic acid based on relative abundance. (G) IC50 inhibition of palmitoleic acid against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. (H) IC50 inhibition of linoleic acid against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g005
Figure 6. Lipidic compounds from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T associated with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibition. A combined dereplication workflow integrating LCMS and MS/MS with triple quadrupole (LC-MS-TQ), high-resolution LC-MS-QTOF, and 1H NMR spectroscopy was employed to identify compounds and prioritize structurally distinct lipidic compounds for further characterization.
Figure 6. Lipidic compounds from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T associated with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibition. A combined dereplication workflow integrating LCMS and MS/MS with triple quadrupole (LC-MS-TQ), high-resolution LC-MS-QTOF, and 1H NMR spectroscopy was employed to identify compounds and prioritize structurally distinct lipidic compounds for further characterization.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g006
Figure 7. BODIPYTM 493/503 Staining Reveals Intracellular Lipid Localization in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T Mycelia. Representative microscopy images showing lipid distribution in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T mycelia stained with the lipophilic dye BODIPYTM 493/503. (A) Brightfield image showing the filamentous morphology and dense hyphal network characteristic of Streptomyces species. (B) Fluorescence image revealing intense green BODIPYTM 493/503 signal along the hyphae, indicating the presence of intracellular lipid-enriched regions in the mycelia. (C) Merged image of the brightfield and fluorescence channels, confirming the colocalization of lipid signal within the mycelial structures. Note: Scale bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 7. BODIPYTM 493/503 Staining Reveals Intracellular Lipid Localization in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T Mycelia. Representative microscopy images showing lipid distribution in Streptomyces sp. DSD454T mycelia stained with the lipophilic dye BODIPYTM 493/503. (A) Brightfield image showing the filamentous morphology and dense hyphal network characteristic of Streptomyces species. (B) Fluorescence image revealing intense green BODIPYTM 493/503 signal along the hyphae, indicating the presence of intracellular lipid-enriched regions in the mycelia. (C) Merged image of the brightfield and fluorescence channels, confirming the colocalization of lipid signal within the mycelial structures. Note: Scale bar represents 10 µm.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g007
Figure 8. Comparative lipid metabolite profiling of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitory Streptomyces strains. (A) LC-UV chromatogram overlay (190 nm) of the hexane fraction from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T and its corresponding bioactive HPLC fractions (H17–H24). Chromatograms were acquired using the DSD454IH17–H24 method optimized for the detection of lipid compounds associated with 3CLpro inhibition. (B) LC-UV chromatogram overlays (190 nm) of hexane fractions from Streptomyces spp. DSD454T, DSD149T, DSD735T, DSD2893T, and DSD2604T. All strains exhibited six conserved lipid-associated peaks, with DSD454T and DSD149T displaying nearly identical retention times and relative peak intensities.
Figure 8. Comparative lipid metabolite profiling of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitory Streptomyces strains. (A) LC-UV chromatogram overlay (190 nm) of the hexane fraction from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T and its corresponding bioactive HPLC fractions (H17–H24). Chromatograms were acquired using the DSD454IH17–H24 method optimized for the detection of lipid compounds associated with 3CLpro inhibition. (B) LC-UV chromatogram overlays (190 nm) of hexane fractions from Streptomyces spp. DSD454T, DSD149T, DSD735T, DSD2893T, and DSD2604T. All strains exhibited six conserved lipid-associated peaks, with DSD454T and DSD149T displaying nearly identical retention times and relative peak intensities.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g008
Figure 9. Molecular docking of lipid-based control Alotaketal C analogue 19, peptide-based GC376, palmitoleic acid 1, and linoleic acid 2 with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. (A) Circos plot illustrating the predicted molecular interactions of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, alotaketal C analogue 19 (lipid-based positive control), and GC376 (peptide-based positive control), with key residues located at the catalytic, dimerization, and cryptic binding sites of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Interacting residues are color-coded by interaction type (e.g., hydrogen bonds, van der Waals, π-alkyl), and domains are highlighted to distinguish site-specific binding patterns. (B) Heatmap showing the predicted binding affinities (kcal/mol) and GB8 values of the 13 lipid compounds across catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic sites. GB8 scores indicate binding site strength and selectivity. Compounds marked with ND* (Not Determined) were excluded from GB8 analysis due to technical limitations of the fastDRH platform. (C) Molecular docking poses of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, lipid-based positive control alotaketal C analogue 19, and peptide-based positive control GC376 at the cryptic site of 3CLpro, highlighting key interactions with conserved residues such as Arg131, Tyr239, Leu272, Leu287, and Asp289. Interactions are visualized as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, alkyl, and π-alkyl contacts. (D) Statistical comparisons of the binding affinity of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, lipid-based positive control alotaketal C analogue 19, and peptide-based positive control GC376. Note that (***) signifies that p value is <0.05 and considered as statistically significant. ns: no significance.
Figure 9. Molecular docking of lipid-based control Alotaketal C analogue 19, peptide-based GC376, palmitoleic acid 1, and linoleic acid 2 with SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. (A) Circos plot illustrating the predicted molecular interactions of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, alotaketal C analogue 19 (lipid-based positive control), and GC376 (peptide-based positive control), with key residues located at the catalytic, dimerization, and cryptic binding sites of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. Interacting residues are color-coded by interaction type (e.g., hydrogen bonds, van der Waals, π-alkyl), and domains are highlighted to distinguish site-specific binding patterns. (B) Heatmap showing the predicted binding affinities (kcal/mol) and GB8 values of the 13 lipid compounds across catalytic, dimeric, and cryptic sites. GB8 scores indicate binding site strength and selectivity. Compounds marked with ND* (Not Determined) were excluded from GB8 analysis due to technical limitations of the fastDRH platform. (C) Molecular docking poses of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, lipid-based positive control alotaketal C analogue 19, and peptide-based positive control GC376 at the cryptic site of 3CLpro, highlighting key interactions with conserved residues such as Arg131, Tyr239, Leu272, Leu287, and Asp289. Interactions are visualized as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, alkyl, and π-alkyl contacts. (D) Statistical comparisons of the binding affinity of palmitoleic acid 1, linoleic acid 2, lipid-based positive control alotaketal C analogue 19, and peptide-based positive control GC376. Note that (***) signifies that p value is <0.05 and considered as statistically significant. ns: no significance.
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 g009
Table 1. Chemical Profiling of HPLC Fractions from Streptomyces sp. DSD454I sample: HRMS and MS/MS-Based Dereplication via LCMS-QTOF and LCMS-TQ Using Fragmentation Pattern Analysis and Database-Assisted Structural Annotation.
Table 1. Chemical Profiling of HPLC Fractions from Streptomyces sp. DSD454I sample: HRMS and MS/MS-Based Dereplication via LCMS-QTOF and LCMS-TQ Using Fragmentation Pattern Analysis and Database-Assisted Structural Annotation.
Compound No.Compound
Name
FractionHRMS
m/z
Predicted
Chemical
Formula
∆ ppm
Error
DBETQ-MS
MS/MS Fragments
1palmitoleic acidH20, H21253.2175 [M-H]C16H30O22.02.0237.15, 219.20, 163.05, 135.05
2linoleic acidH21279.2327 [M-H]C18H32O21.13.0263.20, 245.25, 133.10
3aggreceride BH22313.2736 [M+H-H2O]+C19H38O4−2.11.0313.25, 257.25, 239.20, 109.10
49-heptadecenoic acidH22267.2329 [M-H]C17H32O23.02.0251.25, 233.20, 209.15, 181.05, 135.10
5aggreceride CH23, H24327.2888 [M+H-H2O]+C20H40O4−3.11.0327.30, 271.20, 253.25, 109.10
62,3-dihydroxypropyl
octadeca-9,12-dienoate
H23355.2831 [M+H]+C21H38O4−4.83.0337.40, 293.50, 263.20
72,3-dihydroxypropyl nonadeca-9,12-dienoateH24369.2999 [M+H]+C22H40O4−1.63.0277.20, 253.40, 151.00, 137.00, 123.05, 109.10
82,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoateH20325.2739 [M+H-H2O]+C20H38O4−1.22.0325.25, 269.20, 251.25, 233.20, 135.10, 121.10, 109.10
92,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoateH17, H18,
H19
311.2588 [M+H-H2O]+C19H36O4−1.32.0311.25, 255.25, 237.20, 219.20, 135.10, 121.10, 109.10
10aggreceride AH19299.2581 [M+H-H2O]+C18H36O4−1.71.0299.25, 243.20, 137.15, 123.10, 111.10
11linolenic acidH19277.2168 [M-H]C18H30O20.04.0261.20, 223.10, 209.10, 187.15, 173.10, 149.15, 137.20, 123.15, 109.10
129-hydroxy-10,12-octadecadienoic acidH17279.2330 [M+H-H2O]+C18H32O32.13.0279.20, 261.20, 223.20, 149.10
132,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoateH17297.2434 [M+H-H2O]+C18H34O41.32.0297.20, 241.20, 223.20, 205.20, 149.10, 135.10, 121.10
Table 2. Predicted Physicochemical, Pharmacokinetic, and Toxicological Properties of Fatty Acids and Monoacylglycerols from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T.
Table 2. Predicted Physicochemical, Pharmacokinetic, and Toxicological Properties of Fatty Acids and Monoacylglycerols from Streptomyces sp. DSD454T.
Compound No.Compound NamePhysicochemical PropertyMedicinal ChemistryAbsorptionDistributionMetabolismExcretionToxicity
TPSA aLipinski RuleCaco-2
Permeability
Bioavailability Score bPPB cCYP2C9 dCYP3A4 dCYP2C8 dFAAH e,*Half-Life (T1/2)Clearance (CLplasma)AMES fHuman HepatoxicityhERG g Channel InhibitionRat Oral Acute
Toxicity (LD50)
F20%F30%F50%InhibitorSubstrateInhibitorSubstrateInhibitor
1Palmitoleic acid37.30Accepted−5.0850.1830.6360.38198.30%0.6931.0000.0000.0001.0000.4800.7643.3710.0950.2320.1320.083
2Linoleic acid37.30Accepted−5.0510.1480.3880.60897.50%0.7131.0000.0010.0001.0000.2560.5023.9640.1070.1380.1590.033
3Aggreceride B66.76Accepted−5.1560.5230.8280.92097.30%0.0180.1780.8140.2020.7860.1020.5565.4100.3940.3590.1060.019
49-Heptadecenoic acid37.30Accepted−5.0750.5350.9270.69399.10%0.8550.9990.0030.0001.0000.6620.8693.3800.0170.6780.0710.043
5Aggreceride C66.76Accepted−5.1550.5980.8820.93597.50%0.0180.1900.8140.1920.8030.1050.5905.3440.3590.3620.1220.018
62,3-dihydroxypropyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate66.76Accepted−5.0730.6130.6040.95997.50%0.0201.0000.9990.0001.0000.2480.4495.5350.4240.0860.1850.005
72,3-dihydroxypropyl nonadeca-9,12-dienoate66.76Accepted−5.0440.8090.8740.96797.60%0.0310.9990.9980.0001.0000.2310.4585.4030.4010.1040.2010.005
82,3-dihydroxypropyl heptadec-9-enoate66.76Accepted−5.0930.8970.9710.95598.40%0.1100.0301.0000.0001.0000.1050.6604.8430.0950.5540.0840.007
92,3-dihydroxypropyl hexadec-9-enoate66.76Accepted−5.0610.7040.8120.87897.80%0.0200.9250.9980.0001.0000.1600.6054.9170.3930.1510.1550.014
10Aggreceride A66.76Accepted−5.1230.8370.9040.90996.80%0.0250.1360.7770.0670.7370.1120.5995.1340.3650.3190.0860.017
11Linolenic acid37.30Accepted−5.0540.2220.4970.44198.20%0.0251.0000.0020.0001.0000.1740.3544.6480.5510.0160.1770.036
12Hydroxylinoleic acid (9-HODE)57.53Accepted−5.1250.4400.9630.62897.10%0.3221.0000.0000.0000.9990.0980.9503.9050.2020.5670.0940.104
132,3-dihydroxypropyl pentadec-9-enoate66.76Accepted−5.0750.5850.7810.95298.10%0.3710.0450.9990.0001.0000.1270.6734.8840.1360.5840.0700.007
Pharmaceuticals 19 00294 i001
a TPSA = Topological Polar Surface Area; b Bioavailability score F20%/F30%/F50% = Oral bioavailability at 20%, 30%, or 50%, respectively; c PPB = Plasma Protein Binding; d CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C8 = Major cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in hepatic metabolism; e FAAH = Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase; f AMES = Ames test for mutagenicity; g hERG = Human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene. * FAAH probability score predicted by SwissTarget Prediction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dalisay, D.S.; Mateo, J.C.; Teodosio, J.J.R.; de Guzman, L.S.; Marcial, N.B.J.M.; Caspe, D.P.C.; Balida, L.A.P.; Jamal, J.A. Marine Streptomyces-Derived Lipids Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Through In Vitro and Predicted Multi-Site Binding Mechanisms. Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19, 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020294

AMA Style

Dalisay DS, Mateo JC, Teodosio JJR, de Guzman LS, Marcial NBJM, Caspe DPC, Balida LAP, Jamal JA. Marine Streptomyces-Derived Lipids Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Through In Vitro and Predicted Multi-Site Binding Mechanisms. Pharmaceuticals. 2026; 19(2):294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dalisay, Doralyn S., Jomari C. Mateo, Jade Joshua R. Teodosio, Leighiara S. de Guzman, Neaven Bon Joy M. Marcial, Dion Paul C. Caspe, Lex Aliko P. Balida, and Jamia Azdina Jamal. 2026. "Marine Streptomyces-Derived Lipids Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Through In Vitro and Predicted Multi-Site Binding Mechanisms" Pharmaceuticals 19, no. 2: 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020294

APA Style

Dalisay, D. S., Mateo, J. C., Teodosio, J. J. R., de Guzman, L. S., Marcial, N. B. J. M., Caspe, D. P. C., Balida, L. A. P., & Jamal, J. A. (2026). Marine Streptomyces-Derived Lipids Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Through In Vitro and Predicted Multi-Site Binding Mechanisms. Pharmaceuticals, 19(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020294

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop