Next Article in Journal
Molecular Basis of BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Comment on Somnin et al. Study of Interactions Between Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents and Collagen by Taylor Dispersion Analysis and Frontal Analysis Continuous Capillary Electrophoresis. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1633
Previous Article in Special Issue
Origanum vulgare L. Essential Oil Mitigates Palmitic Acid-Induced Impairments in Insulin Signaling and Glucose Uptake in Human Adipocytes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Qin et al. Metabolites from the Dendrobium Endophyte Pseudomonas protegens CM-YJ44 Alleviate Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells via the IRS1/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/GLUT4 Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 817

1
Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Quality and Safety Control in Storage and Transport Process, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2, Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
2
National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(8), 1234; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081234
Submission received: 28 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 August 2025 / Published: 21 August 2025

Error in Table

In the original publication [1], there were some mistakes in Table 1 as published. In Table 1, the following corrections should be made: Concerning the compound Dendrobine, the values of M+H+ and M−H were mistakenly reversed; specifically, the correct M+H+ value should be 264.19581, and the correct M−H value should be 262.18125. Concerning the compound Xanthohumol, the values of M+H+ and M−H were mistakenly reversed; the correct M+H+ value should be 355.154, the correct M−H value should be 353.13945, and the correct classification should be Coumarins. Concerning the compound Rutin, the values of M+H+ and M−H were mistakenly reversed; the correct M+H+ value should be 611.16066, and the correct M−H value should be 609.14611. Concerning the compound Chrysin, the values of M+H+ and M−H were mistakenly reversed; the correct M+H+ value should be 255.06519, and the correct M−H value should be 253.05063. Concerning the compound Scopoletin, the values of M+H+ and M−H were mistakenly reversed; the correct M+H+ value should be 193.04954, the correct M−H value should be 191.03498, and the correct classification should be Flavonoids. Concerning the compound Nardosinone, the correct classification should be Miscellaneous Compounds. Concerning the compound Ginsenoside F2, the correct retention time should be 12.87. Concerning the compound Pinoresinol, the values of M+H+ and M−H were incorrectly presented; the “Molecular Formula” should be C20H26O6, and the “Molecular Weight” value should be 354.17801; the correct M+H+ value should be 355.19039, and the correct M−H value should be 353.17583. Concerning the compound Chrysin, the values of M+H+ and M−H were incorrectly presented; the correct M+H+ value should be 387.18022, and the correct M−H value should be 385.16566.
The corrected legend appears below:
Table 1. Identification of components of CM-YJ44-3.
Table 1. Identification of components of CM-YJ44-3.
ComponentsMolecular FormulaMolecular Weight[M+H]+[M−H]Retention Time (S)ClassificationKnown Sources
Embelin *C17H26O4294.18311295.19039293.1758310.19Benzoquinone derivativePlant [25]
Protopine *C20H19NO5353.12632354.1336352.1190512.25AlkaloidsPlant [26]
DendrobineC16H25NO2263.27234264.19581262.181254.72AlkaloidsFungi [27], Plant [28]
7-Hydroxycoumarin *C9H6O3162.03169163.03897161.0244220.05CoumarinsPlant [29]
Xanthohumol *C21H22O5354.42452355.154353.139458.91CoumarinsPlant [30]
RutinC27H30O16610.51842611.16066609.1461112.7FlavonoidsFungi [31], Plant [32]
ChrysinC15H10O4254.24234255.06519253.050636.72FlavonoidsFungi [33], Plant [34]
ScopoletinC10H8O4192.17255193.04954191.034988.35FlavonoidsFungi [35], Plant [36]
Nardosinone *C15H22O3250.15689249.14962251.1641711.73Miscellaneous CompoundsPlant [37]
Azelaic acidC9H16O4188.10486189.11214187.097585.9Organic AcidsFungi [38], Plant [39]
Benzoic acidC7H6O2122.03678123.04406121.029513.46Organic AcidsBacteria [40], Plant [41]
Caffeic acidC9H8O4180.04226181.04954179.034985.65Phenolic CompoundsBacteria [42], Plant [43]
Cinnamic acidC9H8O2148.05243137.05971135.0451518.84Phenolic CompoundsFungi [44], Plant [45]
20 (R)-Ginsenoside Rh1C36H62O9638.43938639.44666637.432115.5SaponinsFungi [46], Plant [47]
Ginsenoside F1C36H62O9638.43938639.44666637.432115.68SaponinsFungi [46], Plant [47]
Ginsenoside F2C42H72O13784.49729785.50457783.4900212.87 SaponinsFungi [48], Plant [47]
Ginsenoside Rg2C42H72O13784.49729785.50457783.4900210.54SaponinsFungi [48], Plant [47]
AtractylodinC13H10O182.07316183.08044181.0658911.06TerpenesFungi [49], Plant [50]
GingerolC17H26O4294.18311295.19039293.1758310.19TerpenesFungi [51], Plant [52]
Artemisinic acid *C15H22O2234.16198235.16926233.154713.08TerpenesPlant [53]
PinoresinolC20H26O6354.17801355.19039353.175839.96TerpenesFungi [54], Plant [55]
Eudesmin *C22H26O6386.17294387.18022385.165667.92TerpenesPlant [56]
CurcumeneC15H22O2234.16198235.16926233.154713.08TerpenesFungi [57], Plant [58]
Benzyl glycolate *C9H10O3166.06299167.07027165.055725.11Miscellaneous CompoundsSynthetic compound
* Metabolites detected for the first time in Pseudomonas.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Qin, L.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, B.; Zheng, J.; Diao, R.; Liu, J.; Wang, F. Metabolites from the Dendrobium Endophyte Pseudomonas protegens CM-YJ44 Alleviate Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells via the IRS1/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/GLUT4 Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qin, L.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, B.; Zheng, J.; Diao, R.; Liu, J.; Wang, F. Correction: Qin et al. Metabolites from the Dendrobium Endophyte Pseudomonas protegens CM-YJ44 Alleviate Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells via the IRS1/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/GLUT4 Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 817. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081234

AMA Style

Qin L, Zhou Y, Fan B, Zheng J, Diao R, Liu J, Wang F. Correction: Qin et al. Metabolites from the Dendrobium Endophyte Pseudomonas protegens CM-YJ44 Alleviate Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells via the IRS1/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/GLUT4 Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 817. Pharmaceuticals. 2025; 18(8):1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qin, Luqi, Yixia Zhou, Bei Fan, Jiahuan Zheng, Rao Diao, Jiameng Liu, and Fengzhong Wang. 2025. "Correction: Qin et al. Metabolites from the Dendrobium Endophyte Pseudomonas protegens CM-YJ44 Alleviate Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells via the IRS1/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/GLUT4 Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 817" Pharmaceuticals 18, no. 8: 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081234

APA Style

Qin, L., Zhou, Y., Fan, B., Zheng, J., Diao, R., Liu, J., & Wang, F. (2025). Correction: Qin et al. Metabolites from the Dendrobium Endophyte Pseudomonas protegens CM-YJ44 Alleviate Insulin Resistance in HepG2 Cells via the IRS1/PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/GLUT4 Pathway. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 817. Pharmaceuticals, 18(8), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081234

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop