Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators

Cadelis, Melissa M.; Liu, Tim; Sue, Kenneth; Rouvier, Florent; Bourguet-Kondracki, Marie-Lise; Brunel, Jean Michel; Copp, Brent R.

doi:10.3390/ph16060823

Open AccessArticle

Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators

by

Melissa M. Cadelis

^1,2

,

Tim Liu

¹,

Kenneth Sue

¹

,

Florent Rouvier

³

,

Marie-Lise Bourguet-Kondracki

⁴,

Jean Michel Brunel

³

and

Brent R. Copp

^1,*

¹

School of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

²

School of Medical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

³

UMR MD1 “Membranes et Cibles Thérapeutiques”, U1261 INSERM, Faculté de Pharmacie, Aix-Marseille Université, 27 bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France

⁴

Laboratoire Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Micro-organismes, UMR 7245 CNRS, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57 Rue Cuvier (C.P. 54), 75005 Paris, France

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(6), 823; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060823

Submission received: 4 May 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant- , Microbial- and Marine-Derived Natural Product Research in Drug Discovery: Strengths and Perspectives)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Antibiotic resistance is a growing global health threat, requiring urgent attention. One approach to overcome antibiotic resistance is to discover and develop new antibiotic enhancers, molecules that work with legacy antibiotics to enhance their efficacy against resistant bacteria. Our previous screening of a library of purified marine natural products and their synthetic analogues led to the discovery of an indolglyoxyl-spermine derivative that exhibited intrinsic antimicrobial properties and was also able to potentiate the action of doxycycline towards the difficult to treat, Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A set of analogues have now been prepared, exploring the influence of indole substitution at the 5- and 7- positions and length of the polyamine chain on biological activity. While limiting cytotoxicity and/or hemolytic activities were observed for many analogues, two 7-methyl substituted analogues (23b and 23c) were found to exhibit strong activity towards Gram-positive bacteria with no detectable cytotoxicity or hemolytic properties. Different molecular attributes were required for antibiotic enhancing properties, with one example identified, a 5-methoxy-substitiuted analogue (19a), as being a non-toxic, non-hemolytic enhancer of the action of two tetracycline antibiotics, doxycycline and minocycline, towards P. aeruginosa. These results provide further stimulation for the search for novel antimicrobials and antibiotic enhancers amongst marine natural products and related synthetic analogues.

Keywords:

indole; potentiator; antimicrobial; polyamine; antibiotics; antifungal agents; structure–activity relationships

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The global increase in microbial antibiotic resistance is a growing health threat, requiring urgent attention. With only limited numbers of new antibiotics being approved for clinical use [1,2,3] the search is on for novel strategies that can prove effective against drug-resistant pathogens. One option for treatment is to restore the antibiotic action of legacy antibiotics, requiring the discovery of antibiotic adjuvants or enhancers [4,5,6,7,8]. Marine natural products represent an excellent reservoir of small drug-like molecules from which to discover both new classes of antimicrobial agents [9,10,11] as well as antibiotic enhancers [8,12,13,14].

Our screening of a library of marine natural product-related α,ω-disubstituted spermine analogues for antimicrobial and antibiotic enhancing properties identified the 6-bromoindolglyoxyl derivative 1 (Figure 1) as a moderately active antimicrobial towards the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MIC 6.25 µM) and the fungus Cryptococcus neoformans (MIC 1.1 µM). In addition, the combination of 1 with doxycycline exhibited a strong antibiotic enhancement effect towards the Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa [15]. Interest in these activities was somewhat tempered by the observation of associated cytotoxicity (human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293, IC₅₀ 5.1 µM; rat skeletal myoblast cell line L6, IC₅₀ 7.7 µM), prompting the search for less toxic analogues. Subsequent studies identified the requirement of substitution on the indole ring for activity, with 2 being inactive as an antimicrobial or antibiotic enhancer, and that some examples of 5- and 7- substituted analogues (3–8), notably including halogen, methoxy or methyl functionality, exhibited more modest antimicrobial activities (Table 1), were moderate to excellent antibiotic enhancers (Table 2) and were generally less cytotoxic and non-hemolytic (Table 3) [16].

Taken together, these studies enabled the identification of the structural requirements for antibiotic enhancement properties amongst a limited set of indolglyoxyl-spermine conjugates, summarized in Figure 2.

A component of the structure–activity relationship yet to be addressed in this compound series is the effect, if any, of variation in the polyamine (PA) chain length on intrinsic antimicrobial, antibiotic enhancement and cytotoxicity/hemolysis biological activities. Previous studies investigating disubstituted polyamine-bearing arylacyl [17] head groups identified that changes in the chain length of the core polyamine fragment can lead to wide variation in antimicrobial and/or antibiotic enhancing properties. Herein we report details on the synthesis of a new set of indolglyoxyl-polyamine conjugates that vary in substitution at the 5- and 7- positions on the indole ring and that vary in polyamine chain length, and the abilities of these analogues to exhibit intrinsic antimicrobial properties and to potentiate the activity of doxycycline towards the Gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The Boc-protected polyamine scaffolds used in this study were the five examples 9a–e covering core chain lengths of 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 methylenes (Figure 3). The preparation of 9a–e has been previously described [18,19,20,21].

The indole-3-glyoxyl head groups used in the current study (10–16) (Figure 4) were the same set previously explored in analogues 2–8 [16]. Syntheses of 10–15, as either the glyoxylic acid or glyoxylchloride, have been previously reported [22,23,24,25].

In the case of the 7-methyl analogue 16, it was prepared using the two-step protocol shown in Scheme 1. Reaction of 7-methyl-1H-indole with excess oxalyl chloride afforded the oxalylchloride intermediate which was not isolated but hydrolyzed by heating with saturated aq. NaHCO₃ solution to afford 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) (Figure S1) in 95% yield over two steps.

The reaction of indole-3-glyoxyl chlorides 10–12 and 14 directly with Boc-protected polyamines 9a–e, or glyoxylic acids 13, 15 and 16 with 9a–e utilizing the coupling reagent PyBOP (benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate) afforded a set of intermediate products that were then deprotected with 2,2,2-trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to afford the desired compounds as their di-TFA salts (Scheme 2, Figures S2–S30).

2.2. Biological Evaluation

The antimicrobial activity of the series was evaluated against a range of bacterial strains (S. aureus, MRSA, P. aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) and the fungus Candida albicans (Table 1). Cytotoxicity towards HEK293 (human kidney epithelial cell line, IC₅₀) and hemolytic activity against human red blood cells (HC₁₀) were also determined.

Table 1. Antimicrobial (MIC), cytotoxicity (IC₅₀) and hemolytic (HC₁₀) activities (µM) of analogues 2–8, 17–23.

Compound	S. a ^a	MRSA ^b	P. a ^c	E. c ^d	C. a ^e	Cyto. ^f	Hem. ^g
2	>100 ^h	41.4	>100 ^h	>100 ^h	>41.4 ^h	>41 ^h	>41
3	3.125 ^h	4.32	50 ^h	25 ^h	>34.4 ^h	14 ^h	>34
4	100 ^h	38.4	>200 ^h	>200 ^h	>38.4 ^h	>38 ^h	>38
5	25 ^h	20.0	100 ^h	200 ^h	>40.0 ^h	>40 ^h	>40
6	25 ^h	19.8	200 ^h	200 ^h	>39.6 ^h	19 ^h	>40
7	15 ^h	38.4	>200 ^h	>200 ^h	38.4 ^h	27 ^h	>38
8	25 ^h	20.0	>200 ^h	>200 ^h	>40.0 ^h	>40 ^h	>40
17a	12.5	>40	>200	50	>40	n.d ⁱ	n.d
17b	25	39	>200	25	>39	31	>39
17c	25	39	100	12.5	>39	10	>39
17d	14.6	18.7	117	117	37	4.9	>37
17e	25	9.04	>200	>200	36	5.6	>36
18a	1.56	4.17	50	6.25	16.7	8.9	>33
18b	6.4	4.1	51	51	16	13	>33
18c	25	8.1	>200	>200	32	18	>32
18d	6.16	7.88	200	98	32	16	>32
18e	5.99	3.84	96	24	31	8.6	20
19a	29	>37	>200	>200	>37	>37	>37
19b	57	37	>200	>200	37	>37	>37
19c	>100	>36	>100	>100	36	18	26
19d	12.5	17.4	>200	50	35	6.8	>35
19e	12.5	34	>200	100	34	8.6	>34
20a	12.5	≤0.30	200	50	>39	>39	n.d.
20b	6.25	≤0.30	200	50	>38	n.d.	>38
20c	3.125	4.7	800	12.5	>37	>37	n.d.
20d	3.125	≤0.28	800	12.5	9.0	>36	n.d.
20e	3.125	n.d.	800	12.5	2.2	n.d.	2.0
21a	7.5	19.1	240	240	>38	12	>38 ^e
21b	7.3	18.8	>200	>200	38	11	>38
21c	29	18.5	>200	>200	>37	9.2	>37
21d	3.125	4.48	>200	6.25	36	4.7	>36
21e	27.2	4.34	>220	>220	35	6.4	>35
22a	50	>37	800	400	>37	>37	>37
22b	25	>37	800	200	>37	8.9	>37
22c	25	4.5	800	200	>36	n.d.	>36
22d	25	≤0.27	800	50	17	>35	8.4
22e	3.125	≤0.26	800	12.5	≤0.26	n.d.	0.93
23a	30.2	≤0.30	>240	60	>39	>39	>39
23b	14.8	≤0.30	>240	120	>38	>38	>38
23c	7.3	≤0.29	>230	29	>37	>37	>37
23d	7.1	≤0.28	>230	14.1	18	>36	n.d.
23e	6.85	≤0.27	>220	13.7	≤0.27	>35	8.4

^a S. aureus ATCC 25923 with streptomycin (MIC 21.5 µM) and chloramphenicol (MIC 1.5–3 µM) used as positive controls and values presented as the mean (n = 3); ^b MRSA ATCC 43300 with vancomycin (MIC 0.7 μM) used as a positive control and values presented as the mean (n = 2); ^c P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 with streptomycin (MIC 21.5 µM) and colistin (MIC 1 µM) used as positive controls and values presented as the mean (n = 3); ^d E. coli ATCC 25922 with streptomycin (MIC 21.5 µM) and colistin (MIC 2 µM) used as positive controls and values presented as the mean (n = 3); ^e C. albicans ATCC 90028 with fluconazole (MIC 0.4 μM) as a positive control and values presented as the mean (n = 2); ^f Concentration of compound at 50% cytotoxicity on HEK293 (human embryonic kidney cells) with tamoxifen as the positive control (IC₅₀ 24 µM) and values presented as the mean (n = 2); ^g Concentration of compound at 10% hemolytic activity on human red blood cells with melittin as the positive control (HC₁₀ 0.95 μM) and values presented as the mean (n = 2); ^h Data taken from Cadelis et al. [16]; ⁱ n.d., not determined.

In general, the compound set exhibited more pronounced activity towards the Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus ATCC 25923 and MRSA, with only poor or no activity towards Gram-negative bacteria P. aeruginosa and E. coli and the fungus C. albicans. Amongst the more active examples identified were the 5-bromo substituted analogues 18a–e with S. aureus and MRSA MIC 1.6–7.8 µM, 5-methyl analogues 20a–d (MIC ≤ 0.28–6.25 µM), 7-methoxy analogue 22e (MIC ≤ 0.26–3.125 µM), and 7-methyl substituted variants 23c–e (MIC ≤ 0.27–7.3 µM). In many cases, those analogues that exhibited good levels of antimicrobial activity also unfortunately demonstrated cytotoxicity and/or hemolytic activity. There were some examples identified, however, that were devoid of these detrimental properties including the 7-methyl substituted analogues 23b (MIC MRSA ≤ 0.30 µM, cytotoxicity IC₅₀ > 38 µM, hemolysis HC₁₀ > 38 µM) and 23c (MIC MRSA ≤ 0.29 µM, cytotoxicity IC₅₀ > 37 µM, hemolysis HC₁₀ > 37 µM). Overall, the discovery of Gram-positive antibacterial activity for 23b and 23c with low to no cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity suggests a narrow structure–activity requirement of 7-methyl substitution and polyamine mid-chain length of 7 (PA3-7-3) or 8 (PA3-8-3) carbons for optimal activity.

The set of compounds were next evaluated for the ability to potentiate the activity of the antibiotic doxycycline towards the Gram-negative bacteria P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (Table 2). In these assays, doxycycline is present at a concentration of 2 µg/mL (4.5 µM), well below the observed MIC of 20 µg/mL (50 µM) towards this drug-resistant human pathogen.

Table 2. Doxycycline potentiation activity (MIC, µM) of analogues 2–8, 17–23.

Compound	Conc (µM) for Potentiation ^a	Compound	Conc (µM) for Potentiation ^a
2	>50 ^b	20a	12.5
3	3.125 ^b	20b	12.5
4	12.5 ^b	20c	400
5	6.25 ^b	20d	400
6	3.125 ^b	20e	400
7	3.75 ^b	21a	3.7
8	6.25 ^b	21b	7.3
17a	12.5	21c	58
17b	100	21d	100
17c	50	21e	>200
17d	58	22a	100
17e	6.25	22b	100
18a	6.5	22c	200
18b	12.9	22d	400
18c	>200	22e	400
18d	25	23a	60
18e	24	23b	240
19a	7.3	23c	230
19b	114	23d	230
19c	25	23e	220
19d	>200
19e	>200

^a Concentration (µM) required to restore doxycycline activity at 2 µg/mL (4.5 µM) against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853; ^b Data taken from Cadelis et al. [16].

Strong antibiotic enhancing activities were observed for the PA3-6-3 analogues 18a (5-bromo, MIC 6.5 µM), 19a (5-methoxy, MIC 7.3 µM) and 21a (7-fluoro, MIC 3.7 µM), the 7-fluoro substituted PA3-7-3 analogue 21b (MIC 7.3 µM), and the unsubstituted indolglyoxyl-PA3-12-3 analogue 17e (MIC 6.25 µM).

A closer investigation of the ability of the 5-methoxy-indolglyoxyl-PA3-6-3 analogue 19a to enhance the action of other antibiotics towards P. aeruginosa identified it to be capable of reactivating another tetracycline antibiotic minocycline (MIC 14.5 µM), was only a weak activator of chloramphenicol (MIC 58 µM) and could not restore the activity of erythromycin or nalidixic acid (Table 3).

Table 3. Antibiotic potentiating activity of 19a.

Antibiotic	Concentration (µM) for Potentiation against P. aeruginosa ^a
No antibiotic	>200
Minocycline	14.5
Erythromycin	>200
Chloramphenicol	58
Nalidixic acid	>200

All values presented as the mean (n = 3). ^a Concentration (µM) of compound 19a required to restore antibiotic activity at 2 µg/mL concentration of antibiotic. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 against minocycline (MIC 70 µM), erythromycin (MIC >200 µM), chloramphenicol (MIC >200 µM) and nalidixic acid (MIC >200 µM).

The spectrum of antibiotic potentiating activity of the 7-fluoro analogue 21a was also investigated, evaluating its ability to enhance other antibiotics against other Gram-negative bacteria (Table 4). The polyamine-conjugate was able to restore the action of doxycycline against E. coli (MIC 1.56 µM) and to a lesser degree against Acinetobacter baumannii (MIC 12.5 µM). Of the other combinations examined, 21a was also found to weakly enhance the action of chloramphenicol and nalidixic acid towards P. aeruginosa. We have observed similar levels of drug-organism antibiotic enhancement for other examples of indolglyoxyl-polyamines [16].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry: General Remarks

Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer spectrometer 100 Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, MA, USA) equipped with a universal ATR accessory. Mass spectra were acquired on a Bruker micrOTOF Q II spectrometer. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a Bruker (Karlsruhe, Germany) AVANCE 400 spectrometer using standard pulse sequences. Proto-deutero solvent signals were used as internal references (DMSO-d₆: δ_H 2.50, δ_C 39.52). For ¹H NMR, the data are quoted as position (δ), relative integral, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, dt = doublet of triplet, tt = triplet of triplet, m = multiplet), coupling constant (J, Hz), and assignment to the atom. The ¹³C NMR data are quoted as position (δ), and assignment to the atom. Flash column chromatography was carried out using Davisil silica gel (40–60 μm) or Merck LiChroprep RP-8 (40–63 µm) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Thin-layer chromatography was conducted on Merck DC Kieselgel 60 RP-18 F254S plates. All solvents used were of analytical grade or better and/or purified according to standard procedures. Chemical reagents used were purchased from standard chemical suppliers and used as purchased. Protected polyamines di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9a), di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9b), di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9c), di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9d), and di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9e) [18,19,20,21], 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (10) [22], 2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (11) [16], 2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (12) [23], 2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (13) [24], 2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (14) [5], 2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (15) [25], and polyamine conjugates (17c/17e/19c/19e/22c/22e) [25] were synthesized using procedures from the literature.

3.1.1. General Procedure A—Coupling of 3-Indolglyoxylyl Chlorides with Boc-Protected Polyamine

To a solution of 3-indolglyoxylyl chloride (2 equiv.) in DMF (1 mL) was added DIPEA (6 equiv.) and Boc-protected polyamine 9a–e (1 equiv.) in DMF (1 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 48 h before solvent removal under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified using silica gel flash column chromatography (3% MeOH:CH₂Cl₂).

3.1.2. General Procedure B—Boc Deprotection

A solution of tert-butyl-carbamate derivative in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) and TFA (0.2 mL) was stirred at room temperature under N₂ for 2 h followed by solvent removal under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified using C₈ reversed-phase flash column chromatography (0%–50% MeOH/H₂O (+0.05% TFA)) to afford the product as a di-TFA salt.

3.1.3. General procedure C—Coupling of Indole-Oxoacetic Acids with Boc-Protected Polyamine

To a solution of indole-oxoacetic acid (2 equiv.) and PyBOP (2 equiv.) in DMF (1 mL) was added DIPEA (3.5 equiv.) and Boc-protected polyamine 9a–e (1 equiv.) in DMF (1 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h under N₂ at room temperature before the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified using silica gel flash column chromatography (1–4% MeOH:CH₂Cl₂).

3.2. Synthesis of Compounds

3.2.1. 2-(7-Methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic Acid (16)

Oxalyl chloride (0.69 mL, 8.0 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C to 7-methyl-1H-indole (0.35 g, 2.7 mmol) in anhydrous diethyl ether (10 mL) and the solution stirred for 1.5 h. Saturated aq. NaHCO₃ (10 mL) was then added, and the solution heated at reflux for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature, 10% aq. HCl was added to adjust the pH to 1. The resulting yellow precipitate was filtered, washed with cold diethyl ether (10 mL) and dried under vacuum, affording 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) as a yellow solid (0.52 g, 95%). The product was used in the next step without further purification. R_f (MeOH:10% HCl, 3:1) 0.57; m.p. 206 °C (decomp); IR ν_max (ATR) 3320, 2944, 2832, 1625, 1448, 1112, 1028 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.37 (1H, br s, NH-1), 8.37 (1H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-2), 8.01 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4), 7.16 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-5), 7.08 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, H-6), 2.51 (3H, s, Me), OH not observed; ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 180.9 (C-8), 165.3 (C-9), 137.5 (C-2), 136.1 (C-7a), 125.4 (C-3a), 124.3 (C-6), 122.9 (C-5), 122.1 (C-7), 118.7 (C-4), 112.7 (C-3), 16.7 (Me); (−)-HRESIMS [M-H]^– m/z 202.0514 (calcd for C₁₁H₈NO₃, 202.0510).

3.2.2. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17a)

Using general procedure A, 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-indoloxoacetyl chloride (10) (0.048 g, 0.24 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9a) (0.050 g, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (0.13 mL, 0.74 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow gum (0.045 g, 48%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.040 g, 0.05 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 17a as a pale-yellow oil (0.018 g, 45%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.63; IR (ATR) ν_max 3389, 2949, 2838, 1713, 1663, 1342, 1333, 1204, 1031 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.26 (2H, br s, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.76 (2H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, H-2), 8.32 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.24–8.22 (2H, m, H-4), 7.55–7.53 (2H, m, H-7), 7.28–7.25 (4H, m, H-5, H-6), 3.35–3.26 (4H, obscured, H₂-11), 2.96–2.86 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.88–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.58–1.53 (4H, m, H₂-16), 1.33–1.30 (4H, m, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 136.3 (C-7a), 126.2 (C-3a), 123.6 (C-6), 123.7 (C-5), 121.2 (C-4), 112.6 (C-7), 112.1 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.8 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 25.7, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 573.3190 (calcd for C₃₂H₄₁N₆O₄, 573.3184).

3.2.3. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17b)

Using general procedure A, 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (10) (0.072 g, 0.35 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9b) (0.078 g, 0.17 mmol) and DIPEA (0.18 mL, 1.03 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.046 g, 33%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.010 g, 0.013 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 17b as an orange oil (0.011 g, 100%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.64; IR (ATR) ν_max 3269, 2865, 1677, 1627, 1495, 1438 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.36 (2H, s, NH-1), 8.87 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.76 (2H, s, H-2), 8.65 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.24–8.22 (2H, m, H-4), 7.57–7.53 (2H, m, H-7), 7.29–7.23 (2H, m, H-5, H-6), 3.31 (4H, m, H₂-11), 2.92–2.88 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.88–1.85 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.57 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.28–1.23 (6H, m, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.8 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 136.3 (C-7a), 126.2 (C-3a), 123.5 (C-6), 122.6 (C-5), 121.3 (C-4), 112.6 (C-7), 112.1 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 587.3344 (calcd for C₃₃H₄₃N₆O_4, 587.3340).

3.2.4. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17d)

Using general procedure A, 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (10) (0.073 g, 0.36 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9d) (0.084 g, 0.17 mmol) and DIPEA (0.19 mL, 1.1 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a dark yellow oil (0.056 g, 40%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.016 g, 0.019 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 17d as a yellow oil (0.011 g, 66%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.60; IR (ATR) ν_max 3410, 2844, 2677, 1630, 1494, 1441 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.29 (2H, s, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.76 (2H, d, J = 2.6 Hz, H-2), 8.41 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.24–8.22 (2H, m, H-4), 7.55–7.53 (2H, m, H-7), 7.29–7.25 (4H, m, H-5, H-6), 3.30–3.27 (4H, obscured, H₂-11), 2.98–2.84 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.88–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.57–1.53 (4H, m, H₂-16), 1.24 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.7 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 136.2 (C-7a), 126.2 (C-3a), 123.5 (C-6), 122.6 (C-5), 121.2 (C-4), 112.6 (C-7), 112.1 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.7, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 25.9, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 629.3804 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₉N₆O₄, 629.3810).

3.2.5. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18a)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-indoloxoacetyl chloride (11) (0.067 g, 0.24 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9a) (0.050 g, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (0.13 mL, 0.74 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a pale yellow gum (0.030 g, 27%). Using general procedure B, this product (0.030 g, 0.03 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 18a as a pale-yellow oil (0.006 g, 19%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.38; IR (ATR) ν_max 3434, 1672, 1627, 1433, 1293, 1202, 1137, 1028, 721 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.48 (2H, br s, NH-1), 8.91 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.80 (2H, s, H-2), 8.45 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.35 (2H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-4), 7.53 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 3.34–3.29 (4H, obscured, H₂-11), 2.97–2.86 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.85 (4H, tt, J = 8.5, 8.5 Hz, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.31 (4H, br s, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.3 (C-9), 139.5 (C-2), 135.1 (C-7a), 128.0 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-6), 123.3 (C-4), 115.4 (C-5), 114.7 (C-7), 111.6 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 25.7, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+Na]⁺ m/z 751.1230 (calcd for C₃₂H₃₈⁷⁹Br₂N₆NaO₄, 751.1213), 753.1199 (calcd for C₃₂H₃₈⁷⁹Br⁸¹BrN₆NaO₄, 753.1196), 755.1197 (calcd for C₃₂H₃₈⁸¹Br₂N₆NaO₄, 755.1183).

3.2.6. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18b)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (11) (0.089 g, 0.31 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9b) (0.069 g, 0.15 mmol) and DIPEA (0.16 mL, 0.92 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as an orange oil (0.027 g, 17%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.010 g, 0.010 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 18b as a yellow oil (0.009 g, 80%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.35; IR (ATR) ν_max 3422, 2955, 2839, 1680, 1434 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.48 (2H, d, J = 2.8 Hz, NH-1), 8.91 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.80 (2H, d, J = 2.8, H-2), 8.44 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.35 (2H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-4), 7.53 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-7), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.4, 6.4 Hz, H₂-11), 2.93–2.89 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.88–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.29–1.23 (6H, m, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.3 (C-9), 139.5 (C-2), 135.1 (C-7a), 128.0 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-6), 123.3 (C-4), 115.4 (C-5), 114.7 (C-7), 111.6 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 743.1570 (calcd for C₃₃H₄₁⁷⁹Br₂N₆O₄, 743.1551), 745.1555 (calcd for C₃₃H₄₁⁷⁹Br⁸¹BrN₆O₄, 745.1533), 747.1544 (calcd for C₃₃H₄₁⁸¹Br₂N₆O₄, 747.1521).

3.2.7. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18c)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (11) (0.072 g, 0.25 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9c) (0.055 g, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (0.12 mL, 0.66 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a brown oil (0.035 g, 30%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.020 g, 0.021 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 18c as a brown oil (0.0048 g, 23%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.32; IR (ATR) ν_max 3056, 2163, 1978, 1711, 1677, 1433, 1360, 1265, 1203, 1141, 1058, 738, 704 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.46 (2H, s, NH-1), 8.93 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.82 (2H, br s, H-2), 8.37 (2H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-4), 8.36 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 7.55 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-7), 7.44 (2H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.8 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, obscured, H₂-11), 2.94–2.89 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.86–1.83 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.55–1.53 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.26–1.23 (8H, m, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.3 (C-9), 139.5 (C-2), 135.0 (C-7a), 128.0 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-6), 123.3 (C-4), 115.4 (C-5), 114.8 (C-7), 111.6 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.3 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+Na]⁺ m/z 779.1548 (calcd C₃₄H₄₂⁷⁹Br₂N₆NaO₄, 779.1526), 781.1513 (calcd C₃₄H₄₂⁷⁹Br⁸¹BrN₆NaO₄, 781.1509), 783.1497 (calcd C₃₄H₄₂⁸¹Br₂N₆NaO₄, 783.1497).

3.2.8. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18d)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (11) (0.083 g, 0.29 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9d) (0.068 g, 0.14 mmol) and DIPEA (0.15 mL, 0.86 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as an orange oil (0.042 g, 30%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.026 g, 0.026 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 18d as a brown oil (0.007 g, 34%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.34; IR (ATR) ν_max 3023, 1676, 1438, 1203, 1030, 721 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.46 (2H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, NH-1), 8.91 (2H, t, J = 5.9 Hz, NH-10), 8.80 (2H, s, H-2), 8.35 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.35 (2H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-4), 7.53 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 8.5, 2.1 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.84 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.84 (4H, tt, J = 7.6, 7.6 Hz, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.24 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.3 (C-9), 139.5 (C-2), 135.1 (C-7a), 128.0 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-6), 123.3 (C-4), 115.4 (C-5), 114.7 (C-7), 111.6 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.7, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 25.9, 25.6, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 785.2001 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₇⁷⁹Br₂N₆O₄, 785.2020), 787.1988 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₇⁷⁹Br⁸¹BrN₆O₄, 787.2003), 789.1973 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₇⁸¹Br₂N₆O₄, 789.1992).

3.2.9. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18e)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (11) (0.081 g, 0.28 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9e) (0.073 g, 0.14 mmol) and DIPEA (0.15 mL, 0.86 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a dark orange oil (0.047 g, 33%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.014 g, 0.014 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 18e as a yellow oil (0.011 g, 76%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.35; IR (ATR) ν_max 3402, 2981, 2036, 1681, 1654, 1385 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.50 (2H, d, J = 2.3 Hz, NH-1), 8.91 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.80 (2H, d, J = 2.4, H-2), 8.44 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.35 (2H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H-4), 7.53 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 7.41 (2H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.8 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.3, 6.3 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.84 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.86–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.27–1.23 (16H, m, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19, H₂-20); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.4 (C-9), 139.5 (C-2), 135.1 (C-7a), 128.0 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-4), 123.3 (C-6), 115.4 (C-5), 114.7 (C-7), 111.6 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.9, 28.8, 28.5 (C-18, C-19, C-20), 25.9, 25.6, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 813.2336 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₁⁷⁹Br₂N₆O₄, 813.2333), 815.2315 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₁⁷⁹Br⁸¹BrN₆O₄, 815.2317), 817.2308 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₁⁸¹Br₂N₆O₄, 817.2306).

3.2.10. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19a)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-indoloxoacetyl chloride (12) (0.057 g, 0.24 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9a) (0.050 g, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (0.13 mL, 0.74 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as an orange oil (0.025 g, 24%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.018 g, 0.022 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 19a as a pale orange oil (0.016 g, 86%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.74; IR (ATR) ν_max 3422, 1691, 1628, 1485, 1274, 1201, 1052, 1026, 1006, 823, 760, 734 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 500 MHz) δ 12.18 (2H, br s, NH-1), 8.86 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz, NH-10), 8.69 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-2), 8.44 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 7.74 (2H, d, J = 2.6 Hz, H-4), 7.44 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-7), 6.91 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, H-6), 3.79 (6H, s, OMe), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.8, 6.8 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.86 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.84 (4H, br s, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.31 (4H, br s, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 125 MHz) δ 181.5 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 156.0 (C-5), 138.4 (C-2), 131.0 (C-7a), 127.2 (C-3a), 113.3 (C-7), 112.8 (C-6), 112.0 (C-3), 103.5 (C-4), 55.3 (OMe), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 25.7, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 633.3396 (calcd for C₃₄H₄₅N₆O₆, 633.3395).

3.2.11. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19b)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (12) (0.079 g, 0.33 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9b) (0.070 g, 0.15 mmol) and DIPEA (0.16 mL, 0.92 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.004 g, 33%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.017 g, 0.02 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 19b as a yellow oil (0.014 g, 80%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.72; IR (ATR) ν_max 3318, 2981, 1678, 1621, 1486, 1438 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.22 (2H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, NH-1), 8.86 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.69 (2H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, H-2), 8.51 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 7.75 (2H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, H-4), 7.44 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-7), 6.90 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, H-6), 3.79 (6H, s, OMe), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.4, 6.4 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.89 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.89–1.88 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.29 (6H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.6 (C-8), 163.9 (C-9), 156.0 (C-5), 138.4 (C-2), 131.0 (C-7a), 127.2 (C-3a), 113.3 (C-7), 112.8 (C-6), 112.0 (C-3), 103.5 (C-4), 55.3 (OMe), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 647.3554 (calcd for C₃₅H₄₇N₆O₆, 647.3552).

3.2.12. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19d)

Using general procedure A, 2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (12) (0.081 g, 0.34 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9d) (0.076 g, 0.16 mmol) and DIPEA (0.17 mL, 0.97 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.033 g, 23%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.016 g, 0.018 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 19d as a dark orange oil (0.014 g, 85%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.76; IR (ATR) ν_max 3364, 2946, 2833, 1579, 1419 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.24 (2H, s, NH-1), 8.85 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.68 (2H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, H-2), 8.54 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 7.75 (2H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-4), 7.44 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-7), 6.90 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 1.9 Hz, H-6), 3.79 (6H, s, OMe), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.2, 6.2 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.86–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br m, H₂-16), 1.24 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.6 (C-8), 163.9 (C-9), 156.0 (C-5), 138.4 (C-2), 131.0 (C-7a), 127.2 (C-3a), 113.3 (C-7), 112.8 (C-6), 112.0 (C-3), 103.5 (C-4), 55.3 (OMe), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.7, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 25.9, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 689.4040 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₃N₆O₆, 689.4021).

3.2.13. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20a)

Using general procedure C, 2-(5-methyl -1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (13) (0.070 g, 0.34 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9a) (0.072 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.178 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.52 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido) propyl) carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.054 g, 39%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.025 g, 0.031 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 20a as a brown gum (0.021 g, 81%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.59; IR (ATR) ν_max 3325, 2945, 1678, 1448, 1113, 1021 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.20 (2H, d, J = 2.8 Hz, NH-1), 8.85 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, H-10), 8.69 (2H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, H-2), 8.49 (4H, br s, H-14), 8.03 (2H, s, H-4), 7.41 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-7), 7.09 (2H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.6, 6.6 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.42 (6H, s, Me), 1.88–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.30 (4H, br s, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 164.0 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 134.6 (C-7a), 131.6 (C-5), 126.5 (C-3a), 125.0 (C-6), 121.1 (C-4), 112.3 (C-7), 111.8 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.8 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 25.8, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 21.4 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 601.3511 (calcd for C₃₄H₄₅N₆O₄, 601.3497).

3.2.14. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20b)

Using general procedure C, 2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (13) (0.080 g, 0.39 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9b) (0.085 g, 0.19 mmol), PyBOP (0.204 g, 0.39 mmol) and DIPEA (0.1 mL, 0.57 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido) propyl) carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.079 g, 51%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.045 g, 0.055 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 20b as a brown gum (0.024 g, 52%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.53; IR (ATR) ν_max 3306, 2943, 1653, 1448, 1118, 1022, 739 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.24 (2H, d, J = 2.7 Hz, NH-1), 8.85 (2H, t, J = 6.2 Hz, NH-10), 8.70 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-2), 8.55 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.04 (2H, br s, H-4), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-7), 7.09 (2H, dd, J = 8.43 and 1.4, H-6), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.42 (6H, s, Me), 1.89–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.60–1.52 (4H, br m, H₂-16), 1.28 (6H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.9 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 134.6 (C-7a), 131.6 (C-5), 126.5 (C-3a), 124.9 (C-6), 121.1 (C-4), 112.3 (C-7), 111.8 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4, (C-12, C-16, C-17), 21.4 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 615.3664 (calcd for C₃₅H₄₇N₆O₄, 615.3653).

3.2.15. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20c)

Using general procedure C, 2-(5-methyl -1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (13) (0.080 g, 0.39 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9c) (0.088 g, 0.19 mmol), PyBOP (0.204 g, 0.39 mmol) and DIPEA (0.1 mL, 0.57 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.054 g, 34%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.030 g, 0.036 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 20c as a brown gum (0.030 g, 97%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.50; IR (ATR) ν_max 3307, 2943, 1676, 1448, 1116, 1022, 713 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.25 (2H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, NH-1), 8.85 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.70 (2H, d, J = 3.2 Hz, H-2), 8.55 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.04 (2H, br s, H-4), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-7), 7.09 (2H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.5 Hz, H-6), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.94–2.85 (8H, br s, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.42 (6H, s, Me), 1.89–1.82 (4H, br s, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.26 (6H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.9 (C-9), 138.4 (C-2), 134.6 (C-7a), 131.5 (C-5), 126.5 (C-3a), 124.9 (C-6), 121.1 (C-4), 112.3 (C-7), 111.8 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.3 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 21.4 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 629.3818 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₉N₆O₄, 629.3810).

3.2.16. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20d)

Using general procedure C, 2-(5-methyl -1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (13) (0.070 g, 0.34 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9d) (0.081 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.179 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.50 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.087 g, 60%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.043 g, 0.050 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 20d as a white gum (0.044 g, 99%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.44; IR (ATR) ν_max 3307, 2944, 1678, 1449, 1115, 1021 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.24 (2H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, NH-1), 8.85 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.70 (2H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-2), 8.52 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.04 (2H, br s, H-4), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-7), 7.09 (2H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.5 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.42 (6H, s, Me), 1.89–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.57–1.52 (4H, m, H₂-16), 1.24 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.9 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 134.6 (C-7a), 131.5 (C-5), 126.6 (C-3a), 124.9 (C-6), 121.1 (C-4), 112.3 (C-7), 111.8 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.7, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 25.9, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 21.4 (Me), (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 657.4125 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₃N₆O₄, 657.4123).

3.2.17. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20e)

Using general procedure C, 2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (13) (0.070 g, 0.34 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9e) (0.086 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.179 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.50 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.092 g, 62%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.045 g, 0.051 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 20e as a white gum (0.039 g, 84%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.41; IR (ATR) ν_max 3307, 2944, 1678, 1452, 1113, 740 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.24 (2H, d, J = 2.9 Hz, NH-1), 8.85 (2H, t, J = 6.3 Hz, NH-10), 8.70 (2H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, H-2), 8.51 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.04 (2H, br s, H-4), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-7), 7.09 (2H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.5 Hz, H-6), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.4, 6.4 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.42 (6H, s, Me), 1.89–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.57–1.52 (4H, m, H₂-16), 1.31–1.22 (16H, br m, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19, H₂-20); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.9 (C-9), 138.5 (C-2), 134.6 (C-7a), 131.5 (C-5), 126.6 (C-3a), 124.9 (C-6), 121.1 (C-4), 112.3 (C-7), 111.8 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 29.0, 28.9, 28.6 (C-18, C-19, C-20), 25.9, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 21.4 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 685.4453 (calcd for C₄₀H₅₇N₆O₄, 685.4436).

3.2.18. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21a)

Using general procedure A, 2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-indoloxoacetyl chloride (14) (0.053 g, 0.24 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9a) (0.050 g, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (0.13 mL, 0.74 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow gum (0.016 g, 16%). Using general procedure B, this product (0.016 g, 0.02 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 21a as a pale yellow oil (0.006 g, 35%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.76; IR (ATR) ν_max 3434, 1672, 1627, 1433, 1293, 1202, 1137, 1028, 721 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 500 MHz) δ 12.88 (2H, br s, NH-1), 8.95 (2H, t, J = 5.6 Hz, NH-10), 8.77 (2H, s, H-2), 8.42 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.04 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-4), 7.25 (2H, ddd, J = 8.0, 8.0, 5.0 Hz, H-5), 7.14 (2H, dd, J = 11.2, 8.0 Hz, H-6), 3.38–3.29 (4H, m, H₂-11), 2.97–2.91 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.85 (4H, tt, J = 7.3, 7.3 Hz, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.31 (4H, br s, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 125 MHz) δ 181.9 (C-8), 163.4 (C-9), 149.2 (d, ¹J_CF = 245.4 Hz, C-7), 138.8 (C-2), 129.8 (d, ³J_CF = 4.5 Hz, C-3a), 124.0 (d, ²J_CF = 13.4 Hz, C-7a), 123.4 (d, ³J_CF = 5.9 Hz, C-5), 117.4 (d, ⁴J_CF = 2.7 Hz, C-4), 112.8 (C-3), 108.7 (d, ²J_CF = 15.9 Hz, C-6), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.9 (C-11), 25.7, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 609.2987 (calcd for C₃₂H₃₉F₂N₆O₄, 609.2995).

3.2.19. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21b)

Using general procedure A, 2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (14) (0.080 g, 0.36 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9b) (0.079 g, 0.18 mmol) and DIPEA (0.19 mL, 1.1 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a dark yellow oil (0.058 g, 39%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.013 g, 0.016 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 21b as an orange oil (0.013 g, 96%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.75; IR (ATR) ν_max 3401, 2930, 1675, 1635, 1458 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.91 (2H, br d, J = 2.1 Hz, NH-1), 8.94 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.77 (2H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, H-2), 8.51 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.04 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4), 7.25 (2H, ddd, J = 8.1, 8.1, 5.0 Hz, H-5), 7.31 (2H, dd, J = 11.3, 7.3 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.86 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.89–1.82 (4H, br m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.31–1.26 (6H, m, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.9 (C-8), 163.4 (C-9), 149.2 (d, ¹J_CF = 245 Hz, C-7), 138.8 (C-2), 129.9 (d, ³J_CF = 4.4 Hz, C-3a), 123.4 (d, ³J_CF = 6.0 Hz, C-5), 124.0 (d, ²J_CF = 13.2 Hz, C-7a), 117.4 (br s, C-4), 112.8 (C-3), 108.6 (d, ²J_CF = 15.5 Hz, C-6), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.9 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 623.3161 (calcd for C₃₃H₄₁F₂N₆O₄, 623.3152).

3.2.20. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21c)

Using general procedure A, 2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (14) (0.063 g, 0.28 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9c) (0.056 g, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (0.13 mL, 0.75 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a brown oil (0.064 g, 56%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.034 g, 0.041 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 21c as a brown oil (0.030 g, 85%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.70; IR (ATR) ν_max 3430, 1689, 1656, 1050, 1023, 1002, 930, 823, 760 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.89 (2H, d, J = 2.8 Hz, NH-1), 8.94 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.77 (2H, d, J = 3.2 Hz, H-2), 8.46 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.04 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4), 7.25 (2H, ddd, J = 8.0, 8.0, 4.7 Hz, H-5), 7.14 (2H, ddd, J = 11.0, 7.9, 1.0 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.4, 6.4 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.84 (4H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.85 (4H, tt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, tt, J = 6.8, 6.8 Hz, H₂-16), 1.26 (8H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.9 (C-8), 163.4 (C-9), 149.2 (¹J_CF = 245 Hz, C-7), 138.8 (C-2), 129.8 (d, ³J_CF = 4.6 Hz, C-3a), 124.0 (d, ²J_CF = 13.3 Hz, C-7a), 123.4 (d, ³J_CF = 5.3 Hz, C-5), 117.4 (d, ³J_CF = 3.5 Hz, C-4), 112.8 (C-3), 108.7 (d, ²J_CF = 16.0 Hz, C-6), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.3 (C-18), 25.8, 25.6, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 637.3313 (calcd C₃₄H₄₃F₂N₆O₄, 637.3308).

3.2.21. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21d)

Using general procedure A, 2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (14) (0.080 g, 0.35 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9d) (0.084 g, 0.17 mmol) and DIPEA (0.19 mL, 1.1 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a dark yellow oil (0.072 g, 49%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.023 g, 0.027 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 21d as an orange oil (0.018 g, 76%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.73; IR (ATR) ν_max 3405, 2944, 2857, 1674, 1632, 1505, 1439 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.92 (2H, s, NH-1), 8.93 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.78 (2H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-2), 8.49 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.04 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4), 7.24 (2H, dd, J = 8.0, 8.0, 5.0 Hz, H-5), 7.13 (2H, dd, J = 11.2, 8.0 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.84 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.89–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.57–1.52 (4H, br m, H₂-16), 1.23 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.9 (C-8), 163.4 (C-9), 149.3 (d, ¹J_CF = 245 Hz, C-7), 138.8 (C-2), 129.8 (d, ³J_CF = 4.5 Hz, C-3a), 124.1 (d, ²J_CF = 13.2 Hz, C-7a), 123.4 (d, ³J_CF = 5.9 Hz, C-5), 117.4 (d, ³J_CF = 3.1 Hz, C-4), 112.8 (C-3), 108.7 (d, ²J_CF = 15.8 Hz, C-6), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.9 (C-11), 28.7, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 25.9, 25.6, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 665.3639 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₇F₂N₆O₄, 665.3621).

3.2.22. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21e)

Using general procedure A, 2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetyl chloride (14) (0.076 g, 0.034 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9e) (0.087 g, 0.17 mmol) and DIPEA (0.18 mL, 1.0 mmol) to afford di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a dark orange oil (0.047 g, 31%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.045 g, 0.050 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 21e as an orange oil (0.026 g, 56%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 7:3) 0.70; IR (ATR) ν_max 3342, 2929, 1676, 1632, 1506, 1459 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.94 (2H, d, J = 2.7 Hz, NH-1), 8.93 (2H, t, J = 6.9 Hz, NH-10), 8.78 (2H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-2), 8.57 (4H, br s, NH₂-14), 8.04 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-4), 7.24 (2H, ddd, J = 7.8, 7.8, 5.0 Hz, H-5), 7.13 (2H, dd, J = 11.2, 8.0 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.4, 6.4 Hz, H₂-11), 2.94–2.84 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.90–1.83 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.27–1.22 (16H, m, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19, H₂-20); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.9 (C-8), 163.4 (C-9), 149.1 (d, ¹J_CF = 241 Hz, C-7), 138.9 (C-2), 129.9 (d, ³J_CF = 4.2 Hz, C-3a), 124.1 (d, ²J_CF = 14.0 Hz, C-7a), 123.4 (d, ³J_CF = 6.1 Hz, C-5), 117.4 (d, ³J_CF = 3.1 Hz, C-4), 112.8 (C-3), 108.6 (d, ²J_CF = 16.1 Hz, C-6), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.9 (C-11), 28.9, 28.8, 28.5 (C-18, C-19, C-20), 25.9, 25.6, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+Na]⁺ m/z 715.3747 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₀F₂N₆NaO₄, 715.3754).

3.2.23. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22a)

Following general procedure C, 2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (15) (0.050 g, 0.23 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9a) (0.047 g, 0.11 mmol), PyBOP (0.119 g, 0.23 mmol) and DIPEA (0.06 mL, 0.34 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido) propyl) carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.020 g, 22%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.016 g, 0.019 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 22a as a black gum (0.013 g, 79%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.68; IR (ATR) ν_max 3317, 2944, 1622, 1449, 1115, 1022, 721 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.45 (2H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 5.5 Hz, NH-10), 8.62 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-2), 8.38 (4H, br s, NH-14), 7.80 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4), 7.19 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-5), 6.86 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-6), 3.95 (6H, s, OMe), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.92–2.88 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.87–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.31 (4H, br s, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.7 (C-9), 146.4 (C-7), 137.4 (C-2), 127.8 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-7a), 123.5 (C-5), 113.7 (C-4), 112.6 (C-3), 104.4 (C-6), 55.4 (OMe), 46.6 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 25.7, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS m/z [M+H]⁺ 633.3408 (calcd for C₃₄H₄₅N₆O₆, 633.3395).

3.2.24. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22b)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (15) (0.086 g, 0.39 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9b) (0.088 g, 0.19 mmol), PyBOP (0.213 g, 0.41 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.52 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.066 g, 41%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.030 g, 0.035 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 22b as a black gum (0.028 g, 90%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.58; IR (ATR) ν_max 3317, 2943, 1675, 1432, 1132, 1022, 721 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.45 (2H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.2 Hz, NH-10), 8.62 (2H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, H-2), 8.35 (4H, br s, NH-14), 7.80 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-4), 7.19 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-5), 6.86 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-6), 3.95 (6H, s, H₃-19), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.96–2.84 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.87–1.82 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.28 (6H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.8 (C-8), 163.7 (C-9), 146.4 (C-7), 137.4 (C-2), 127.8 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-7a), 123.6 (C-5), 113.7 (C-4), 112.6 (C-3), 104.4 (C-6), 55.4 (C-19), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 647.3550 (calcd for C₃₅H₄₇N₆O₆, 647.3552).

3.2.25. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22d)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (15) (0.070 g, 0.32 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9d) (0.078 g, 0.16 mmol), PyBOP (0.170 g, 0.32 mmol) and DIPEA (0.08 mL, 0.47 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.091 g, 65%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.022 g, 0.025 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 22d as a black gum (0.022 g, 98%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.47; IR (ATR) ν_max 3308, 2944, 1679, 1449, 1114, 1021 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.45 (2H, d, J = 3.2 Hz, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.62 (2H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-2), 8.39 (4H, br s, NH-14), 7.80 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-4), 7.19 (2H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, H-5), 6.86 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-6), 3.95 (6H, s, OMe), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.7, 6.7 Hz, H₂-11), 2.96–2.85 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 1.87–1.80 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56–1.53 (4H, m, H₂-16), 1.24 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.7 (C-9), 146.4 (C-7), 137.4 (C-2), 127.8 (C-3a), 126.1 (C-7a), 123.6 (C-5), 113.8 (C-4), 112.7 (C-3), 104.4 (C-6), 55.4 (OMe), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.7, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 25.9, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 689.4010 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₃N₆O₆, 689.4021).

3.2.26. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23a)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) (0.080 g, 0.39 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9a) (0.083 g, 0.19 mmol), PyBOP (0.204 g, 0.39 mmol) and DIPEA (0.1 mL, 0.57 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl hexane-1,6-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido) propyl) carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.019 g, 13%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.010 g, 0.013 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 23a as a brown gum (0.010 g, 97%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.34; IR (ATR) ν_max 3316, 2944, 1668, 1449, 1115, 1022, 721 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.34 (2H, d, J = 2.9 Hz, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.73 (2H, d, J = 3.6 Hz, H-2), 8.45 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4), 7.16 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.92–2.88 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.51 (6H, s, Me), 1.88–1.80 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, m, H₂-16), 1.31 (4H, br s, H₂-17); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.0 (C-2), 135.7 (C-7a), 126.0 (C-3a), 124.1 (C-6), 122.8 (C-5), 121.9 (C-7), 118.8 (C-4), 112.5 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 25.7, 25.5, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 16.6 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 601.3486 (calcd for C₃₄H₄₅N₆O₄, 601.3497).

3.2.27. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23b)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) (0.070 g, 0.34 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9b) (0.075 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.178 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.52 mmol). Purification by column afforded di-tert-butyl heptane-1,7-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido) propyl) carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.066 g, 48%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.030 g, 0.036 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 23b as a brown gum (0.022 g, 71%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.34; IR (ATR) ν_max 3326, 2944, 1678, 1449, 1114, 1022 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR, (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.35 (2H, d, J = 2.8 Hz, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.73 (2H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-2), 8.46 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-4), 7.16 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.51 (6H, s, Me), 1.88–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.28 (6H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.1 (C-2), 135.7 (C-7a), 126.0 (C-3a), 124.1 (C-6), 122.8 (C-5), 121.9 (C-7), 118.8 (C-4), 112.4 (C-3), 46.7 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.0 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.4 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 16.6 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 615.3644 (calcd for C₃₅H₄₇N₆O₄, 615.3653).

3.2.28. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23c)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) (0.070 g, 3.4 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9c) (0.077 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.178 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.52 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.102 g, 73%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.080 g, 0.097 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 23c as a yellow oil (0.036 g, 44%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.34; IR (ATR) ν_max 3325, 2944, 1678, 1448, 1116, 1021 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.35 (2H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, NH-1), 8.89 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.74 (2H, d, J = 3.3 Hz, H-2), 8.47 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4), 7.16 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.85 (8H, br m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.51 (6H, s, Me), 1.88–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56 (4H, br s, H₂-16), 1.26 (8H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.1 (C-2), 135.7 (C-7a), 126.1 (C-3a), 124.1 (C-6), 122.8 (C-5), 121.9 (C-7), 118.8 (C-4), 112.5 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.3 (C-18), 25.8, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 16.6 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 629.3812 (calcd for C₃₆H₄₉N₆O₄, 629.3810).

3.2.29. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23d)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) (0.070 g, 3.4 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-aminopropyl) carbamate) (9d) (0.081 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.179 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.52 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl decane-1,10-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a white solid (0.080 g, 55%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.030 g, 0.035 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 23d as a brown oil (0.029 g, 94%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.26; IR (ATR) ν_max 3312, 2944, 1678, 1449, 1117, 1021 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.35 (2H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, NH-1), 8.90 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz, NH-10), 8.73 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-2), 8.44 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4), 7.16 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, H-6), 3.29 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.97–2.85 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.51 (6H, s, Me), 1.87–1.81 (4H, m, H₂-12), 1.56–1.50 (4H, br m, H₂-16), 1.24 (12H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.1 (C-2), 135.7 (C-7a), 126.1 (C-3a), 124.2 (C-6), 122.9 (C-5), 122.0 (C-7), 118.9 (C-4), 112.5 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 28.8, 28.5 (C-18, C-19), 26.0, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 16.6 (Me), (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 657.4130 (calcd for C₃₈H₅₃N₆O₄, 657.4123).

3.2.30. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23e)

Using general procedure C, 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16) (0.070 g, 0.34 mmol) was reacted with di-tert-butyl octane-1,8-diylbis((3-aminopropyl)carbamate) (9e) (0.086 g, 0.17 mmol), PyBOP (0.179 g, 0.34 mmol) and DIPEA (0.09 mL, 0.52 mmol). Purification by column chromatography afforded di-tert-butyl dodecane-1,12-diylbis((3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)carbamate) as a yellow oil (0.145 g, 97%). Using general procedure B, a sub-sample of this product (0.084 g, 0.095 mmol) was reacted with TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL) to afford the di-TFA salt 23e as a brown oil (0.057 g, 66%). R_f (MeOH/10% HCl, 3:1) 0.23; IR (ATR) ν_max 3325, 2944, 1676, 1448, 1114, 1020 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) δ 12.39 (2H, d, J = 2.7 Hz, NH-1), 8.90 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, NH-10), 8.74 (2H, d, J = 3.2 Hz, H-2), 8.51 (4H, br s, NH-14), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4), 7.16 (2H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H-5), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H-6), 3.30 (4H, dt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-11), 2.98–2.85 (8H, m, H₂-13, H₂-15), 2.51 (6H, s, Me), 1.85 (4H, tt, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, H₂-12), 1.55 (4H, br m, H₂-16), 1.22 (16H, br s, H₂-17, H₂-18, H₂-19, H₂-20); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) δ 181.7 (C-8), 163.8 (C-9), 138.1 (C-2), 135.7 (C-7a), 126.1 (C-3a), 124.1 (C-6), 122.8 (C-5), 122.0 (C-7), 118.8 (C-4), 112.5 (C-3), 46.8 (C-15), 44.7 (C-13), 35.8 (C-11), 29.0, 28.9, 28.6 (C-18, C-19, C-20), 25.9, 25.7, 25.5 (C-12, C-16, C-17), 16.6 (Me); (+)-HRESIMS [M+H]⁺ m/z 685.4421 (calcd for C₄₀H₅₇N₆O₄, 685.4436).

3.3. Antimicrobial Assays

The susceptibility of bacterial strains S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli (ATCC 25922) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) to antibiotics and compounds was determined according to previously reported protocols [17]. Additional antimicrobial evaluation against MRSA (ATCC 43300) and C. albicans (ATCC 90028) was undertaken at the Community for Open Antimicrobial Drug Discovery at The University of Queensland (Australia) according to their standard protocols as reported previously [17,26].

3.4. Determination of the MICs of Antibiotics in the Presence of Synergizing Compounds

Antibiotic enhancing activities were determined according to previously reported protocols [14,17].

3.5. Cytotoxicity Assays

Cytotoxicity assays were conducted according to previously reported protocols [17,26].

3.6. Hemolytic Assay

Hemolysis assays were conducted according to previously reported protocols [17,26].

4. Conclusions

Our original screening for antimicrobial and antibiotic enhancing compounds from a library of marine natural products and their synthetic analogues identified a 6-bromoindolglyoxylamido-spermine conjugate as an active lead compound. Due to associated cytotoxicity and hemolytic properties, further efforts to explore the structure–activity relationship have investigated variation of substitution on the indole ring, and changes in the chain length of the polyamine fragment. While many analogues that were active as Gram-positive antibacterials were also associated with variable levels of cytotoxicity and/or hemolytic properties, the current study has identified two 7-methyl substituted analogues (23b and 23c) with excellent anti-MRSA activity that are non-cytotoxic and non-hemolytic. This result defines a very narrow range of structural features required for optimal antibacterial properties. From the same set of analogues, only one example (19a), a 5-methoxy-PA3-6-3 conjugate, was non-toxic while also exhibiting strong tetracycline antibiotic enhancing activity towards P. aeruginosa. Further studies will be required to refine the mechanism of antibiotic enhancement.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph16060823/s1. Figure S1. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 16; Figure S2. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 17a; Figure S3. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 17b; Figure S4. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 17d; Figure S5. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 18a; Figure S6. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 18b; Figure S7. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 18c; Figure S8. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 18d; Figure S9. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 18e; Figure S10. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 500 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 125 MHz) NMR spectra for 19a; Figure S11. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 19b; Figure S12. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 19d; Figure S13. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 20a; Figure S14. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 20b; Figure S15. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 20c; Figure S16. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 20d; Figure S17. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 20e; Figure S18. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 500 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 125 MHz) NMR spectra for 21a; Figure S19. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 21b; Figure S20. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 21c; Figure S21. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 21d; Figure S22. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 21e; Figure S23. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 22a; Figure S24. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 22b; Figure S25. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 22d; Figure S26. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 23a; Figure S27. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 23b; Figure S28. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 23c; Figure S29. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 23d; Figure S30. ¹H (DMSO-d₆, 400 MHz) and ¹³C (DMSO-d₆, 100 MHz) NMR spectra for 23e.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.R.C.; methodology, M.M.C., T.L., F.R. and K.S.; formal analysis, B.R.C. and J.M.B.; investigation, M.M.C., T.L., F.R., K.S., M.-L.B.-K., J.M.B. and B.R.C.; resources, B.R.C., M.-L.B.-K. and J.M.B.; data curation, B.R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, B.R.C. and M.M.C.; writing—review and editing, B.R.C., M.M.C., M.-L.B.-K. and J.M.B.; supervision, B.R.C., M.M.C. and J.M.B.; project administration, B.R.C. and M.M.C.; funding acquisition, B.R.C., M.M.C., M.-L.B.-K. and J.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Catalyst: Seeding Dumont d’Urville NZ-France Science and Technology Support Programme (19-UOA-057-DDU) provided by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and administered by the Royal Society Te Apārangi, and the Auckland Medical Research Foundation (1116001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Schmitz, Tony Chen and Mansa Nair for their assistance with the NMR and mass spectrometric data and Hugo Gordon for technical support. Some of the antimicrobial screening was performed by CO-ADD (The Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery), funded by the Wellcome Trust (UK) and The University of Queensland (Australia).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Singh, S.B. Confronting the Challenges of Discovery of Novel Antibacterial Agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 3683–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Payne, D.J.; Gwynn, M.N.; Holmes, D.J.; Pompliano, D.L. Drugs for Bad Bugs: Confronting the Challenges of Antibacterial Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Silver, L.L. Challenges of Antibacterial Discovery. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 71–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bernal, P.; Molina-Santiago, C.; Daddaoua, A.; Llamas, M.A. Antibiotic Adjuvants: Identification and Clinical Use: Antibiotic Adjuvants. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Farha, M.A.; Brown, E.D. Discovery of Antibiotic Adjuvants. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 120–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
González-Bello, C. Antibiotic Adjuvants—A Strategy to Unlock Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 4221–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Melander, R.J.; Melander, C. The Challenge of Overcoming Antibiotic Resistance: An Adjuvant Approach? ACS Infect. Dis. 2017, 3, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Douafer, H.; Andrieu, V.; Phanstiel, O.; Brunel, J.M. Antibiotic Adjuvants: Make Antibiotics Great Again! J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 8665–8681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, M.; El-Hossary, E.M.; Oelschlaeger, T.A.; Donia, M.S.; Quinn, R.J.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Potential of Marine Natural Products against Drug-Resistant Bacterial Infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, e237–e245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Barbosa, F.; Pinto, E.; Kijjoa, A.; Pinto, M.; Sousa, E. Targeting Antimicrobial Drug Resistance with Marine Natural Products. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Valdes-Pena, M.A.; Massaro, N.P.; Lin, Y.-C.; Pierce, J.G. Leveraging Marine Natural Products as a Platform to Tackle Bacterial Resistance and Persistence. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 1866–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Salmi, C.; Loncle, C.; Vidal, N.; Letourneux, Y.; Fantini, J.; Maresca, M.; Taïeb, N.; Pagès, J.-M.; Brunel, J.M. Squalamine: An Appropriate Strategy against the Emergence of Multidrug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria? PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lavigne, J.-P.; Brunel, J.-M.; Chevalier, J.; Pages, J.-M. Squalamine, an Original Chemosensitizer to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 799–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pieri, C.; Borselli, D.; Di Giorgio, C.; De Méo, M.; Bolla, J.-M.; Vidal, N.; Combes, S.; Brunel, J.M. New Ianthelliformisamine Derivatives as Antibiotic Enhancers against Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 4263–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, S.A.; Cadelis, M.M.; Sue, K.; Blanchet, M.; Vidal, N.; Brunel, J.M.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Copp, B.R. 6-Bromoindolglyoxylamido Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents and Antibiotic Enhancers. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 2090–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cadelis, M.M.; Pike, E.I.W.; Kang, W.; Wu, Z.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Blanchet, M.; Vidal, N.; Brunel, J.M.; Copp, B.R. Exploration of the Antibiotic Potentiating Activity of Indolglyoxylpolyamines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 111708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, D.; Cadelis, M.M.; Rouvier, F.; Troia, T.; Edmeades, L.R.; Fraser, K.; Gill, E.S.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Brunel, J.M.; Copp, B.R. α,ω-Diacyl-Substituted Analogues of Natural and Unnatural Polyamines: Identification of Potent Bactericides That Selectively Target Bacterial Membranes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Klenke, B.; Gilbert, I.H. Nitrile Reduction in the Presence of Boc-Protected Amino Groups by Catalytic Hydrogenation over Palladium-Activated Raney-Nickel. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2480–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Klenke, B.; Stewart, M.; Barrett, M.P.; Brun, R.; Gilbert, I.H. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of s -Triazine Substituted Polyamines as Potential New Anti-Trypanosomal Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3440–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Israel, M.; Rosenfield, J.S.; Modest, E.J. Analogs of Spermine and Spermidine. I. Synthesis of Polymethylenepolyamines by Reduction of Cyanoethylated α,ι-Alkylenediamines1,2. J. Med. Chem. 1964, 7, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pearce, A.N.; Kaiser, M.; Copp, B.R. Synthesis and Antimalarial Evaluation of Artesunate-Polyamine and Trioxolane-Polyamine Conjugates. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 140, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aubry, C.; Wilson, A.J.; Emmerson, D.; Murphy, E.; Chan, Y.Y.; Dickens, M.P.; García, M.D.; Jenkins, P.R.; Mahale, S.; Chaudhuri, B. Fascaplysin-Inspired Diindolyls as Selective Inhibitors of CDK4/Cyclin D1. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 6073–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liew, L.P.P.; Fleming, J.M.; Longeon, A.; Mouray, E.; Florent, I.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Copp, B.R. Synthesis of 1-Indolyl Substituted β-Carboline Natural Products and Discovery of Antimalarial and Cytotoxic Activities. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 4910–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Petit, S.; Duroc, Y.; Larue, V.; Giglione, C.; Léon, C.; Soulama, C.; Denis, A.; Dardel, F.; Meinnel, T.; Artaud, I. Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of the Peptide Deformylase Inhibitor 5-Bromo-1 H-Indole-3-Acetohydroxamic Acid. ChemMedChem 2009, 4, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, J.; Kaiser, M.; Copp, B. Investigation of Indolglyoxamide and Indolacetamide Analogues of Polyamines as Antimalarial and Antitrypanosomal Agents. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3138–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Blaskovich, M.A.T.; Zuegg, J.; Elliott, A.G.; Cooper, M.A. Helping Chemists Discover New Antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015, 1, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Structures of indolglyoxyl spermine derivatives.

Figure 2. Antibiotic enhancement structure–activity relationship for indolglyoxyl spermine derivatives.

Figure 3. Polyamine scaffolds 9a–e.

Figure 4. Indole-3-glyoxyl head groups 10–16.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic acid (16). Reagents and conditions: (a) oxalyl chloride, Et₂O, 0 °C, 1.5 h; and (b) saturated aq. NaHCO₃, reflux, 2 h (95% over two steps).

Scheme 2. Synthetic route to target indolglyoxylpolyamine conjugates 17–23. Reagents and conditions: (a) for glyoxylchlorides 10–12, 14: DMF, DIPEA, polyamine 9a–e, r.t., 48 h (16–56%); (b) for glyoxylic acids 13, 15, 16: DMF, PyBOP, DIPEA, polyamine 9a–e, r.t., N₂, 24 h (13–97%); and (c) TFA (0.2 mL) in CH₂Cl₂ (2 mL), N₂, 2 h (19–100%).

Table 4. Antibiotic potentiating activity of 21a.

Antibiotic	Concentration (µM) for Potentiation ^a
Antibiotic	P. aeruginosa ^b	E. coli ^c	K. pneumoniae ^d	A. baumannii ^e
No antibiotic	200	>200	>200	100
Doxycycline	3.125	1.56	200	12.5
Erythromycin	100	200	>200	100
Chloramphenicol	25	>200	>200	200
Nalidixic acid	25	200	>200	200

All values presented as the mean (n = 3). ^a Concentration (µM) of compound 21a required to restore antibiotic activity at 2 µg/mL concentration of antibiotic; ^b P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 against doxycycline (MIC 50 µM), erythromycin (MIC > 200 µM), chloramphenicol (MIC > 200 µM) and nalidixic acid (MIC > 200 μM); ^c E. coli ATCC 25922 against doxycycline (MIC 25 μM), erythromycin (MIC > 200 µM), chloramphenicol (MIC > 200 µM) and nalidixic acid (MIC > 200 μM); ^d Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 against doxycycline (MIC 25 μM), erythromycin (MIC > 200 µM), chloramphenicol (MIC 50 µM) and nalidixic acid (MIC 100 μM); ^e A. baumannii AYE against doxycycline (MIC 12.5 μM), erythromycin (MIC 200 µM), chloramphenicol (MIC > 200 µM) and nalidixic acid (MIC > 200 μM).

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cadelis, M.M.; Liu, T.; Sue, K.; Rouvier, F.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Brunel, J.M.; Copp, B.R. Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060823

AMA Style

Cadelis MM, Liu T, Sue K, Rouvier F, Bourguet-Kondracki M-L, Brunel JM, Copp BR. Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(6):823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060823

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cadelis, Melissa M., Tim Liu, Kenneth Sue, Florent Rouvier, Marie-Lise Bourguet-Kondracki, Jean Michel Brunel, and Brent R. Copp. 2023. "Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 6: 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060823

APA Style

Cadelis, M. M., Liu, T., Sue, K., Rouvier, F., Bourguet-Kondracki, M. -L., Brunel, J. M., & Copp, B. R. (2023). Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators. Pharmaceuticals, 16(6), 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060823

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Indolglyoxyl-Polyamine Conjugates as Antimicrobials and Antibiotic Potentiators

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

2.2. Biological Evaluation

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry: General Remarks

3.1.1. General Procedure A—Coupling of 3-Indolglyoxylyl Chlorides with Boc-Protected Polyamine

3.1.2. General Procedure B—Boc Deprotection

3.1.3. General procedure C—Coupling of Indole-Oxoacetic Acids with Boc-Protected Polyamine

3.2. Synthesis of Compounds

3.2.1. 2-(7-Methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetic Acid (16)

3.2.2. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17a)

3.2.3. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17b)

3.2.4. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17d)

3.2.5. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18a)

3.2.6. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18b)

3.2.7. N1,N8-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18c)

3.2.8. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18d)

3.2.9. N1,N12-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18e)

3.2.10. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19a)

3.2.11. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19b)

3.2.12. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19d)

3.2.13. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20a)

3.2.14. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20b)

3.2.15. N1,N8-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20c)

3.2.16. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20d)

3.2.17. N1,N12-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20e)

3.2.18. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21a)

3.2.19. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21b)

3.2.20. N1,N8-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21c)

3.2.21. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21d)

3.2.22. N1,N12-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21e)

3.2.23. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22a)

3.2.24. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22b)

3.2.25. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22d)

3.2.26. N1,N6-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23a)

3.2.27. N1,N7-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23b)

3.2.28. N1,N8-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23c)

3.2.29. N1,N10-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23d)

3.2.30. N1,N12-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23e)

3.3. Antimicrobial Assays

3.4. Determination of the MICs of Antibiotics in the Presence of Synergizing Compounds

3.5. Cytotoxicity Assays

3.6. Hemolytic Assay

4. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI

3.2.2. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17a)

3.2.3. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17b)

3.2.4. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (17d)

3.2.5. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18a)

3.2.6. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18b)

3.2.7. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18c)

3.2.8. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18d)

3.2.9. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(5-bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (18e)

3.2.10. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19a)

3.2.11. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19b)

3.2.12. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (19d)

3.2.13. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20a)

3.2.14. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20b)

3.2.15. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20c)

3.2.16. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20d)

3.2.17. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (20e)

3.2.18. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21a)

3.2.19. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21b)

3.2.20. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21c)

3.2.21. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21d)

3.2.22. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(7-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (21e)

3.2.23. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22a)

3.2.24. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22b)

3.2.25. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(7-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (22d)

3.2.26. N¹,N⁶-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)hexane-1,6-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23a)

3.2.27. N¹,N⁷-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)heptane-1,7-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23b)

3.2.28. N¹,N⁸-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)octane-1,8-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23c)

3.2.29. N¹,N¹⁰-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)decane-1,10-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23d)

3.2.30. N¹,N¹²-Bis(3-(2-(7-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-oxoacetamido)propyl)dodecane-1,12-diaminium 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate (23e)