Next Article in Journal
Cyclocreatine Phosphate: A Novel Bioenergetic/Anti-Inflammatory Drug That Resuscitates Poorly Functioning Hearts and Protects against Development of Heart Failure
Next Article in Special Issue
Cannabidiol and Minor Phytocannabinoids: A Preliminary Study to Assess Their Anti-Melanoma, Anti-Melanogenic, and Anti-Tyrosinase Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting Inflammation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through Drug Repurposing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spiroleiferthione A and Oleiferthione A: Two Unusual Isothiocyanate-Derived Thioketone Alkaloids from Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds

1
Department of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
2
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Institute for Rational and Safe Medication Practices, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
3
College of Pharmacy, Dali University, Dali 671000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(3), 452; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16030452
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023

Abstract

:
Spiroleiferthione A (1), with a 2-thiohydantoin a heterocyclic spiro skeleton, and oleiferthione A (2), an imidazole-2-thione derivative, were isolated from the aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera Lam. seeds. The unprecedented structures of 1 and 2 were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic data, X-ray diffraction, and gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) NMR calculation, as well as electronic circular dichroism (ECD) calculation. The structures of 1 and 2 were determined to be (5R,7R,8S)-8-hydroxy-3-(4′-hydroxybenzyl)-7-methyl-2-thioxo-6-oxa-1, 3-diazaspiro [4.4] nonan-4-one, and 1-(4′-hydroxybenzyl)-4,5-dimethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-imidazole-2-thione, respectively. Biosynthetic pathways for 1 and 2 have been proposed. Compounds 1 and 2 are considered to have originated from isothiocyanate and then undergone a series of oxidation and cyclization reactions to form 1 and 2. Compounds 1 and 2 demonstrated weak inhibition rates of NO production, 42.81 ± 1.56% and 33.53 ± 2.34%, respectively, at a concentration of 50 μM. Additionally, Spiroleiferthione A demonstrated moderate inhibitory activity against high glucose-induced human renal mesangial cell proliferation in a dosage-dependent manner. A wider range of biological activities, and the diabetic nephropathy protective activity of Compound 1 in vivo and its mechanism of action, need further investigation after the sufficient enrichment of Compound 1 or total synthesis.

1. Introduction

Thiohydantoins, imidazole-2-thione derivatives, and isosteric analogues of hydantoin exhibit numerous biological activities, such as anticancer, anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, and antimicrobial properties [1]. To date, no more than 50 naturally occurring thiohydantoin derivatives have been reported in the literature [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. They have mainly been discovered in plants of the Brassicaceae (syn. Cruciferae) family, such as Lepidium meyenii Walp., Armoracia rusticana P.G. Gaertn, and Pugionium cornutum (L.) Gaertn [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Only two imidazole-2-thione derivatives derived from ergothioneine have been isolated from a plant extract, although all previously reported ergothioneine-derived natural products are from fungal and animal sources [11]. These derivatives possess biological activities such as antioxidant, hepatoprotective, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition inhibition [12,13,14].
Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae), a perennial plant of the Moringaceae family, is widely distributed in Africa and South Asia and is consumed as a folk medicine for the treatment of diabetes, paralysis, helminthiasis, sores, and skin infections, or as food [15,16,17]. M. oleifera seeds are an important part of M. oleifera and are rich in bioactive compounds and functional ingredients, which makes them a rich source of nutrition with potent therapeutic properties. Pharmacological studies have shown that the extracts of M. oleifera seeds, or compounds that were isolated from M. oleifera seeds, have a variety of pharmacological activities, namely anti-inflammatory [15,16,18], antiproliferation [15,16,18], hepatoprotective [16,18,19], antiatherosclerotic [16,18,20], antinociceptive [16,18], antidiabetic [18,19,20], antiperoxidative [15,16,18,20], neurodegenerative [18], and cardioprotective properties [15,16,18,20]. Moreover, various chemical constituents have been isolated from the extracts of M. oleifera seeds, such as glucosinolates [15,18], flavonoids [15,16,18], carbamates [18], steroids [15,16,18], fatty acids [16,18], phenolics [15,16,18], and polysaccharides [16]. However, the investigation of bioactive compounds and their bioactivities is still inadequate. In order to enrich the structural diversity and in-depth development of M. oleifera seeds, it is necessary to continuously determine the active ingredients in M. oleifera seeds, especially the sulfur-containing compounds. In our previous studies, the extracts and pyrrole-2-carbaldehydes from the seeds of M. oleifera showed strong diabetic-nephropathy-protective and potential neuroprotective activities [21,22]. In order to enrich the scope of active compounds for further pharmacological research, the chemical composition of M. oleifera seeds was further investigated, with the identification and isolation of two novel thioketone compounds: Spiroleiferthione A (1) and Oleiferthione A (2) (Figure 1). Spiroleiferthione A is a rare 2-thiohydantoin with an unprecedented heterocyclic spiro skeleton. Oleiferthione A is a novel, naturally occurring imidazole-2-thione derivative. Notably, Spiroleiferthione A demonstrated moderate inhibitory activity against high glucose-induced human renal mesangial cell (HRMC) proliferation in a dosage-dependent manner. Herein, details of the isolation, structural elucidation, proposed biosynthesis, and bioactivity of the two compounds are described.

2. Results

2.1. Structural Elucidation

Spiroleiferthione A (1) was obtained as a yellowish, amorphous powder with [α ] D 25 +187 ( 0.03, MeOH). Its molecular formula, C14H16N2SO4, established by HRESIMS as m/z 309.0908 [M + H]+, combined with NMR spectral data (Table 1), indicates eight degrees of unsaturation. Its IR spectrum shows absorption bands for hydroxy (3415 cm−1) and aromatic (1645 and 1563 cm−1) functionalities. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 has peaks indicating an aromatic ring AA′BB′ system [δH 7.04 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2′, 6′) and δH 6.62 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-3′, 5′)], one nitrogen-bearing methylene [δH 4.72 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-7′a) and 4.61(1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-1′b)], one saturated methylene [δH 2.41 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 13.2 Hz, H-9a) and 1.95 (1H, dd, J = 7.2, 13.2 Hz, H-9b)], two nonequivalent methines [δH 3.85 (1H, dq, J = 6.0, 6.0 Hz, H-7) and 3.83 (1H, ddd, J = 7.2, 6.0, 6.0 Hz, H-8)], and one methyl [δH 1.09 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H3-10)]. The 13C NMR and DEPT spectra display signals corresponding to the above proton-bearing units include two additional quaternary carbonyls assigned as carboxylic (δC 172.9, C-4), and thiourea carbonyl (δC 182.6, C-2) groups [3,8,9], and three quaternary carbon resonances that were assigned as two aromatic carbons, including an oxygen-bearing carbon (δC 126.9 and 157.3, respectively) and one nitrogen/oxygen-bearing carbon (δC 90.7) (Table 1). These spectroscopic data, and those of the reported thiohydantoin derivatives (Lee et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2017) indicate that 1 is a thiohydantoin derivative, as confirmed by 2D NMR data analysis (Figure 2). The HSQC and 1H–1H COSY spectra of 1 provide the unambiguous assignment of proton and carbon signals in the NMR spectra. In the HMBC spectrum of 1, correlations from H-2′/6′ to C-1′, C-4′, and C-3′/5′; from H-3′/5′ to C-1′, C-4′, and C-2′/6′; and from H2-7′ to C-2, C-4, C-2′/6′, and C-1′ in combination with the chemical shift of H2-7′, demonstrate that C-7′ of the 1,4-disubstituted benzyl group is connected to the N-3 atom of the thiohydantoin ring (ring A, Figure 1). Additionally, the thiohydantoin ring (Ring A) is connected to Ring B via C-5, supported by the HMBC correlations of H2-9/C-4, C-5, C-7, C-8; H-8/ C-5, C-7, C-9, C-10; H-7/C-5, C-8, C-9, C-10; and H3-10/C-7, C-8, in combination with the chemical shift of C-5 (90.7). Hence, the planar structure of 1 was determined to be 8-hydroxy-3-(4′-hydroxybenzyl)-7-methyl-2-thioxo-6-oxa-1, 3-diazaspiro [4.4] nonan-4-one.
The relative configurations of C-7 and C-8 in 1 were determined by the ROESY correlation observed between H-8 and H3-10, which suggested that H-8 and CH3-10 were on the same side. However, determining the stereochemistry of C-5 was a challenge due to the unprecedented carbon skeleton and the absence of NOEs. To solve this, the 13C NMR chemical shifts for the two possible isomers, namely, 1a [(5R,7R,8S)1] and 1b [(5S,7R,8S) −1], were calculated at the ωB97x-D/6-31G*/B3LYP-D3(BJ)/TZVP level [23]. Isomer 1a yielded a better linear correlation coefficient (R2) value (0.9993 vs. 0.9986) (Figure S1), a lower mean absolute error (MAE, 1.01 vs. 1.57), and a lower root mean square (RMS, 1.29 vs. 1.82) than those of Isomer 1b, suggesting the 5R,7R,8S relative configuration of 1 (Figure 3). Further supporting this conclusion, the experimental and calculated chemical shifts were statistically analyzed using the sorted training set (STS) protocol [23], indicating a striking predominance (99.99% probability) of the (5R,7R,8S) −1 isomer (Figure 3).
ECD calculations were carried out to define the absolute configuration of 1. As shown in Figure 4, the calculated ECD curve matched well with the experimental data, enabling a confident assignment of the absolute configuration of (5R,7R,8S) −1.
Oleiferthione A (2), a yellowish, amorphous powder, has the molecular formula C12H14N2OS with seven degrees of unsaturation, as indicated by HRESIMS m/z 235.0906 [M + H]+ (calcd for C12H15N2OS, 235.0905). In the 1H NMR spectrum, typical resonance values were observed for two singlet methyls [δH 2.04 (3H, s) and 1.93 (3H, s)], a 1,4-disubstituted benzene ring with four aromatic protons [δH 7.09 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz) and 6.71 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz)], and one nitrogen-bearing methylene [δH 5.19 (2H, s)] (Table 2). A p-hydroxyphenyl group [δC 128.8 (C-1′), 129.6 (C-2′, 6′), 116.3 (C-3′, 5′), and 158.1 (C-4′)], two methyls [δC 8.8 (C-6) and 9.1 (C-7)], one nitrogen-bearing aliphatic methylene (δC 48.3, C-7′), one nitrogen-bearing olefin [δC 123.6 (C-4) and 121.5 (C-5)], and one thiourea carbonyl, or one sulfhydryl substituted olefinic carbon (δC 159.3, C-2), were identified from the 13C NMR, DEPT, and HSQC data (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure S5). These data account for the seven degrees of unsaturation, a pentacyclic ring system satisfying one of these.
From the 2D NMR data, the 1H–1H COSY correlations of H-2′/H-3′ and H-5′/H-6′ indicated the 1,4-disubstituted benzene ring (Figure 1). The key HMBC correlations from CH3-6 to C-4 and C-5; from CH3-7 to C-4 and C-5; from H2-7′ to C-2, C-4, C-1′, C-2 ′, and C-6′; from H-2′/H-6′ to C-3′/C-5′, C-4′, and C-1′; and from H-3′/H-5′ to C-2′/C-6′, C-1′, and C-4′, in combination with the chemical shift of C-7′, demonstrate that C-7′, in the 1,4-disubstituted benzyl group, is connected to the N-3 atom of the 4,5-dimethyl-1H-2-thioimidazole or 4,5-dimethyl-1H-imidazole-2-thiol ring. Fortunately, after many attempts, a small crystal of 2 was generated in methanol through the solvent evaporation method. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography using Mo–Kα radiation confirmed the 4,5-dimethyl-1H-2-thioimidazole ring in 2 (CCDC: 2168388, Figure 5). Accordingly, the structure of 2, oleiferthione A, was elucidated as 1-(4′-hydroxybenzyl)-4, 5-dimethyl-1, and 3-dihydro-2H-imidazole-2-thione.

2.2. Proposed Biosynthetic Pathway of 1 and 2

Biosynthetic pathways for 1 and 2 are proposed in Scheme 1. The typical isothiocyanate derived from phenylalanine was considered to be the starting unit [24]. The initial head-to-tail cyclization of isothiocyanate (A) with methyl alanine would produce B with the removal of a methoxy moiety [25]. The oxidation of B would yield key intermediate C. SAM-dependent methyltransferase would catalyze the conversion of C into E, which would dehydrate to afford 2. The oxidation of key intermediate C would give D. Finally, the cyclization of D with methyl lactate would produce 1 in a transformation similar to that producing B.

2.3. Biological Activity Evaluation of 1 and 2

In bioassay experiments, Compounds 1 and 2 were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity and their inhibitory activities against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW 264.7 cells and high glucose-induced human renal mesangial cell (HRMC) proliferation. Compounds 1 and 2 displayed no antimicrobial activity against four bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus subsp. Aureus, Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at a concentration of 100 μM. In the antimicrobial assay, the positive control group (Ceftazidime) displayed inhibition rates of 99.853 ± 0.129% and 100.04 ± 0.069% against E. coli and P. aeruginosa, respectively. Penicillin G sodium salt displayed inhibition rates of 100.232 ± 0.201% and 99.942 ± 0.084% against S. aureus and S. enterica, respectively. Compounds 1 and 2 showed a weak inhibition of NO production with 42.81 ± 1.56% and 33.53 ± 2.34%, respectively, at a concentration of 50 μM. The positive control (L-NG-monomethylarginine) demonstrated an inhibition of NO production with 59.31 ± 2.19%. However, as shown in Figure 6, Compound 1 showed the moderate inhibition of high glucose-induced HRMC proliferation in a dosage-dependent manner. This result suggests that Compound 1 can potentially exert protective effects against the progression of diabetic nephropathy.

3. Discussion

To date, no more than 50 naturally occurring thiohydantoin derivatives have been reported in the literature [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Spiroleiferthione A is a rare 2-thiohydantoin with an unprecedented heterocyclic spiro skeleton that differs from these reported thiohydantoin derivatives. Thus far, only two imidazole-2-thione derivatives derived from ergothioneine have been isolated from a plant extract, although all previously reported ergothioneine-derived natural products are from fungal and animal sources [11]. Oleiferthione A is a novel naturally occurring imidazole-2-thione derivative, which is the third identified plant origin of imidazole-2-thione derivatives. Spiroleiferthione A showed moderate inhibitory activity against high glucose-induced human renal mesangial cell proliferation in a dosage-dependent manner. However, on account of the limitations, the diabetic-nephropathy-protective activity of Compound 1 in vivo and its mechanism of action were not further investigated. Although it has been reported that natural imidazole-2-thione derivatives possess biological activities, such as antioxidant, hepatoprotective, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition inhibition properties [12,13,14], and natural 2-thiohydantoin derivatives showed anti-neuroinflammatory [3,4,8], antibacterial [9], anticancer [8,26], hypolipidemic [2], anticarcinogenic [2], antimutagenic [2], and antithyroidal [2] activities, a wider range of biological effects was not further evaluated due to the limitations of the two compounds. Although various bioactivities of 2-thiohydantoin derivatives have been reported, the antidiabetic nephropathy activity was investigated in this study for the first time. In order to comprehensively investigate its bioactivities and mechanisms of action, the total synthesis of 2-thiohydantoin derivatives may be an effective approach to produce sufficient yields.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured using an INESA SGW-3 automatic polarimeter (Shanghai INESA Physico Optiacal Instrument, Shanghai, China). UV data were recorded using a Cary 300 spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). CD data were measured using a JASCO J-815 CD spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). IR data were recorded using a Nicolet IS50 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). NMR spectra were obtained at 500 MHz or 600 MHz for 1H, and 125 MHz or 150 MHz for 13C on Bruker 500 MHz or 600 MHz spectrometers (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in CD3OD or DMSO-d6, respectively, with the tetramethyl silane (TMS) peak used as a reference. HR-ESIMS data were measured using an Agilent Q-TOF 6545 spectrometer (Agilent Technologies). Column chromatography (CC) was performed using silica gel (200−300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical, Qingdao, China), MCI gel (CHP20P) (Mitsubishi Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), and macroporous adsorbent resin (HPD-300) (Ainuo chemical technology Co., LTD, Zhengzhou, China). HPLC separation was performed using a system consisting of an Agilent 1260, an Agilent 1260 pump, and an Agilent 1260 wavelength absorbance detector with an Agilent (250 × 9.4 mm) semipreparative column packed with C18 (5 μm) (Agilent Technologies). TLC separations were carried out on precoated silica gel GF254 plates (Qingdao Marine Chemical). Spots were visualized under UV light (254 or 356 nm), or by spraying with 10% H2SO4 in 90% EtOH followed by heating.

4.2. Plant Material

M. oleifera (Moringaceae) seeds were collected in September 2019 from Kunming city, Yunnan Province, China (Latitude: 24° 88′ N; Longitude:102° 88′ E). The seeds were dried at 50 °C in an oven. Plant identity was verified by Professor Shao Liu (Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China). A voucher specimen (no. 2019001) was deposited at the Department of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.

4.3. Extraction and Isolation

Dry ground M. oleifera seeds (10 kg) were extracted with water using ultrasonic apparatus (solvent ratio: 1:8 (g seeds: mL H2O), 3 × 1 h). The aqueous extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure and lyophilized to yield a dark brown residue (2.65 kg). The residue was dissolved in H2O (20 L), loaded on a macroporous adsorbent resin (HPD-300) column (10 × 80 cm), and successively eluted with H2O (80 L), EtOH-H2O (1:1) (80 L) and EtOH-H2O (9:1) (50 L) to yield three corresponding fractions: A, B, and C. After removing the solvent under reduced pressure, Fraction A (1.5 kg) was separated by CC over MCI gel CHP 20P (5 L), with successive elution using H2O (20 L), EtOH-H2O (1:1) (20 L), and EtOH-H2O (9:1) (20 L) to yield fractions A1−A3. Fraction A2 (104 g) was subjected to CC over RP silica gel (1 L), with successive elution using EtOH-H2O (3:7) (5L), EtOH-H2O (1:1) (5 L), and MeOH (5 L) to give fractions A2-1−A2-3. Fraction A2-2 (12 g) was subjected to CC over silica gel, with elution by a gradient of increasing MeOH concentration (0−100%) in CH2Cl2 to yield fractions A2-2-1−A2-2-12 based on TLC analysis. A2-2-7 (~100 mg) was purified by RP HPLC (C18 column, 2.0 mL/min), using 23% MeCN in H2O containing 1 ‰ formic acid (v/v) as the mobile phase to yield 1 (1.5 mg, tR = 36.5 min). A2-2-6 (~150 mg) was purified by RP HPLC (C18 column, 2.0 mL/min), using 20% MeCN in H2O containing 1‰ formic acid (v/v) as the mobile phase for the former to yield 2 (2.0 mg, tR = 27.5 min).

4.4. Physicochemical Properties of Compounds 1 and 2

Spiroleiferthione A (1): yellowish, amorphous powder; UV (MeOH) λmax 280 nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3415, 2930, 2856, 1645, 1563, 1439, 1384, 1259, 1152, 1101, 800, 649, 600, 466 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz and DMSO-d6, 600MHz) data, see Table 1; 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz and DMSO-d6, 150MHz) data, see Table 1; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 309.0905 [M + H]+ (calcd for C14H16N2O4S, 309.0904).
Oleiferthione A (2): yellowish, amorphous powder; UV (MeOH) λmax 270 nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3448, 2925, 2850, 1633, 1514, 1456, 1399, 1242, 1168, 1114, 787, 665, 544 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) data, see Table 1; 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125MHz) data, see Table 1; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 235.0901 [M + H]+ (calcd for C12H14N2OS, 235.0900).
Crystallographic and structure refinement for Compound 2: C12H14N2OS, M=235.02, a = 12.2627(6) Å, b = 6.2696(3) Å, c = 16.1773(7) Å, α = 90°, β = 106.647°(3), γ = 90°, V = 1191.62(10) Å3, T = 296.15 K, Space Group Pn, Z = 4, μ(MoKα) = 0.253/mm−1, 6212 reflections collected, 3840 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0282). The final R1 value was 0.0535 (I > 2σ(I). The final wR (F2) values were 0.1217 (I > 2σ(I). The final R1 value was 0.0993 (all data). The final wR (F2) value was 0.1502 (all data). The goodness of fit value on F2 was 1.018.

4.5. Antimicrobial Assay

The microorganisms used in antibacterial assays were obtained from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) (Escherichia coli ATCC25922, Staphylococcus aureus subsp. Aureus ATCC29213, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica ATCC14028, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853. Lysogeny broth (LB, Huankai Microbial, Guangzhou, China) culture media were used for culturing bacteria, while Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB, Huankai Microbial, Guangzhou, China) was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration. The inocula of bacteria was prepared from 24 h-old agar cultures and incubated to logarithmic phase. Ceftazidime (Yuanye biotechnology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China) was used as a positive reference substance. We measured the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Compounds 1 and 2 using the broth microdilution method in 96-well microtiter plates, as described in the literature [27]. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration without any colony growth after incubating the fungus at 28 °C for 16 h. All tests were performed in triplicates.

4.6. Anti-Inflammatory Assay

Murine RAW 264.7 cells were purchased from the Shanghai cell bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). These cells were incubated in RPMI1640 medium plus 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. The cells were treated with LPS (1 µL/mL) and the test compounds for 48 h. L-NMMA was used as a positive control. Accumulated nitrite in the culture supernatants, an indicator of NO synthase activity, was measured by the Griess reaction [28]. Cell viability was examined by MTS assay (Beyotime Inst. Biotech. Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance was examined at 570 nm using a Spectra Max microplate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). All tests were performed in triplicates. The results were expressed as a percentage of the response of the related LPS-treated groups that were designated as 100%.

4.7. Inhibitory Assay of High Glucose-Induced HRMC Proliferation

HRMCs were cultured in DMEM (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, CA, USA) and 1% double antibiotic (penicillin–streptomycin, Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 37 °C in a humidified environment containing 5% CO2. Next, 20 μL of L-DMEM was added to the blank and control wells, and 10 μL each of L-DMEM and 250 mM glucose (0.26 g of D-(+)-glucose dissolved in 8 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and filtered using a 0.22 μm membrane) was added to the other wells to a final glucose concentration of 30 mM, which were then incubated for 24 h [22]. Different concentrations of Compounds 1 and 2 (10, 20, and 50 μM) were added to the designated wells, and the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8, Dojindo, Kyushu Island, Japan) assay was used to detect optical density after 24 h of incubation. We used L-DMEM containing only HRMCs and no intervention drugs as a control group.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVAs and LSD t-tests were used to analyze the groups of samples using SPSS 19.0. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (standard deviation). All the data shown are representative of at least three independent experiments. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

4.9. Computational Section

Crest software was used to search the conformers of (5R,7R,8S)-1 and (5S, 7R, 8S)-1 on the GFNFF level of theory [29,30], following the optimization of GFN2-XTB level with a 4 kcal/mol energy window to remove high-energy conformers [31]. Optimization and frequency calculations of each conformer were performed on B3LYP-D3(BJ)/TZVP (IEFPCM, CH3OH) level of theory. DFT GIAO 13C NMR calculations were performed on the ωB97xD/6-31G * (IEFPCM, CH3OH) level, and data processing followed the reported STS protocol [23]. The calculated shielding tensors of conformers were Boltzmann averages based on the Gibbs free energy. Theoretical ECD was calculated by time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) at the mPW1PW91/6-311g(d) level with the IEF–PCM solvent model (MeOH). SpecDis v1.71 was used to simulate the ECD for (5R,7R,8S)-1 curve with Gaussian band shape at 0.28 eV. The calculated ECD curve of each conformer was Boltzmann-averaged based on its Gibbs free energy. All the DFT calculations were performed using the Gaussian 16 software package.

5. Conclusions

Two isothiocyanate-derived thioketone alkaloids, Spiroleiferthione A and Oleiferthione A, were isolated from the aqueous extract of M. oleifera seeds. The novel structures of 1 and 2 were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic data, gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) NMR calculation, ECD, and X-ray diffraction. Spiroleiferthione A is a rare 2-thiohydantoin with an unprecedented heterocyclic spiro skeleton. Oleiferthione A is a novel, naturally occurring imidazole-2-thione derivative. Spiroleiferthione A demonstrated moderate inhibitory activity against high glucose-induced human renal mesangial cell proliferation in a dosage-dependent manner. This study has enriched the structural diversity of M. oleifera seeds, especially the isothiocyanate-derived, sulfur-containing compounds. It provides clues for the subsequent study of thioketone derivatives and their activities.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph16030452/s1, Figure S1: The linear correlation plots of predicted versus experimental 13C NMR chemical shifts. (Left (5R, 7R, 8S)-1, Right (5S, 7R, 8S)-1). Figures S2–S8: NMR, IR, UV, and MS spectra; Table S1: Geometry data of conformers of isomer 1a and isomer 1b; Figure S2. (+)-HRESIMS spectrum of compound 1; Figure S3. (+)-HRESIMS spectrum of compound 1; Figure S4. The UV spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH; Figure S5. The IR spectrum of compound 1; Figure S6. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz); Figure S7. The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH-d4 (125 MHz); Figure S8. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz); Figure S9. The HSQC spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz for 1H); Figure S10. The HMBC spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz for 1H); Figure S11. The ROESY spectrum and enlarged ROESY spectrum of compound 1 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz); Figure S12. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (600 MHz); Figure S13. The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (150 MHz); Figure S14. The DEPT spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (150 MHz); Figure S15. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (600 MHz); Figure S16. The HSQC spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (600 MHz for 1H); Figure S17. The HMBC spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (600 MHz for 1H); Figure S18. The NOESY spectrum and enlarged NOESY spectrum of compound 1 in DMSO-d6 (600 MHz); Figure S19. (+)-HRESIMS spectrum of compound 2 (page 1); Figure S20. (+)-HRESIMS spectrum of compound 2 (page 2); Figure S21. The UV spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH; Figure S22. The IR spectrum of compound 2; Figure S23. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz); Figure S24. The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH-d4 (125 MHz); Figure S25. The DEPT spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH-d4 (125 MHz); Figure S26. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz); Figure S27. The HSQC spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz for 1H); Figure S28. The HMBC spectrum of compound 2 in MeOH-d4 (500 MHz for 1H); Table S1. Geometry data of conformers of isomer 1a and isomer 1b.

Author Contributions

Y.J. and S.L. designed the experiments. Y.J., R.L., M.L. and J.L. performed the experiments. L.H., Q.H. and R.L. analyzed the data. J.L. and S.L. supervised the study. Y.J. and J.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province in China (Grant No. 2021JJ80084).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks the Analytical and Measuring Center, Central South University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cho, S.; Kim, S.; Shin, D. Recent applications of hydantoin and thiohydantoin in medicinal chemistry. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 164, 517–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huang, Y.; Peng, X.; Qiu, M. Progress on the Chemical Constituents Derived from Glucosinolates in Maca (Lepidium meyenii). Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2018, 8, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lee, T.; Khan, Z.; Kim, S.; Lee, K. Thiohydantoin and hydantoin derivatives from the roots of Armoracia rusticana and their neurotrophic and anti-neuroinflammatory activities. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 3020–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Yan, H.; Peng, X.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, M. Macathiohydantoin L, a novel thiohydantoin bearing a thioxohexahydroimidazo [1,5-a] pyridine moiety from Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.). Molecules 2021, 26, 4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shi, W.; Ruan, J.; Guo, Y.; Ding, Z.; Yan, J.; Qu, L.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T. Bioactive constituents study of Pugionium cornutum L. Gaertn on intestinal motility. Fitoterapia 2019, 138, 104291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Geng, H.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Qiu, S.; Fang, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, M. Macathiohydantoins P–R, three new thiohydantoin derivatives from Maca (Lepidium meyenii). Phytochem. Lett. 2022, 51, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Geng, H.; Yang, D.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Zhou, M.; Mei, W. Meyeniihydantoins A–C, three novel hydantoin derivatives from the roots of Lepidium meyenii Walp. Phytochem. Lett. 2018, 26, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Li, Z.; Zhou, L.; Qiu, M. Lepithiohydimerins A–D: Four pairs of neuroprotective thiohydantoin dimers bearing a disulfide bond from Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.). Chin. J. Chem. 2021, 39, 2738–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, M.; Qin, X.; Shao, L.; Peng, X.; Li, L.; Yang, H.; Qiu, M. Macahydantoins A and B, two new thiohydantoin derivatives from Maca (Lepidium meyenii): Structural elucidation and concise synthesis of macahydantoin A. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2017, 58, 1684–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, M.; Qin, X.; Peng, X.; Wang, X.; Tian, X.; Li, Z.; Qiu, M. Macathiohydantoins B–K, novel thiohydantoin derivatives from Lepidium meyenii. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 4392–4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, Q.; Lin, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Xu, C.; Shi, J. Gastrolatathioneine, an unusual ergothioneine derivative from an aqueous extract of ‘‘tian ma’’: A natural product co-produced by plant and symbiotic fungus. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2016, 27, 1577–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miyano, R.; Matsuo, H.; Mokudai, T.; Noguchi, Y.; Higo, M.; Nonaka, K.; Niwano, Y.; Sunazuka, T.; Shiomi, K.; Takahashi, Y.; et al. Trichothioneic acid, a new antioxidant compound produced by the fungal strain Trichoderma virens FKI-7573. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2020, 129, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kimura, C.; Nukina, M.; Igarashi, K.; Sugawara, Y. β-hydroxyergothioneine, a new ergothioneine derivative from the mushroom Lyophyllum connatum, and its protective activity against carbon tetrachloride-induced injury in primary culture hepatocytes. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matsuo, H.; Nakanishi, J.; Noguchi, Y.; Kitagawa, K.; Shigemura, K.; Sunazuka, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Ōmura, S.; Nakashima, T.; Nanaomycin, K. A new epithelial-mesenchymal transition inhibitor produced by the actinomycete “Streptomyces rosa subsp. notoensis” OS-3966. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2020, 129, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dzuvor, C.; Pan, S.; Amanze, C.; Amuzu, P.; Asakiya, C.; Kubi, F. Bioactive components from Moringa oleifera seeds: Production, functionalities and applications—A critical review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 271–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saini, R.; Sivanesan, I.; Keum, Y. Phytochemicals of Moringa oleifera: A review of their nutritional, therapeutic and industrial significance. 3 Biotech. 2016, 6, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arora, S.; Arora, S. Nutritional significance and therapeutic potential of Moringa oleifera: The wonder plant. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, R.; Liu, J.; Huang, Q.; Liu, S.; Jiang, Y. Moringa oleifera Lam: A systematic review of its botany, ethnomedical uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicity. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2022, 74, 296–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghimire, S.; Subedi, L.; Acharya, N.; Gaire, B. Moringa oleifera: A tree of life as a promising medicinal plant for neurodegenerative diseases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14358–14371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stohs, S.; Hartman, M. Review of the safety and efficacy of Moringa oleifera. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, Y.; Liu, R.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Liu, S.; He, J. Pyrrole-2-carbaldehydes with neuroprotective activities from Moringa oleifera seeds. Phytochemistry 2022, 204, 113451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Liu, R.; Liu, J.; Zhang, F.; Liu, S.; Jiang, Y. Moringa oleifera Lam. seed extract protects kidney function in rats with diabetic nephropathy by increasing GSK-3β activity and activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Phytomedicine 2022, 95, 153856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, W. GIAO 13C NMR calculation with sorted training sets improves accuracy and reliability for structural assignation. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 11350–11358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fahey, J.; Zalcmann, A.; Talalay, P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 5–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jha, S.; Silversides, J.; Boyle, R.; Stephen, J.; Archibald, S. Hydrogen bonded dimers vs. one-dimensional chains in 2-thiooxoimidazolidin-4-one (thiohydantoin) drug derivatives. CrystEngComm 2010, 12, 1730–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bassetto, M.; Ferla, S.; Pertusati, F.; Kandil, S.; Westwell, A.D.; Brancale, A.; Mcguigan, C. Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 118, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yu, H.; Ding, C.; Zhang, L.; Wei, X.; Cheng, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Luo, X. Alstoscholarisine K, an antimicrobial indole from gall-induced leaves of Alstonia scholaris. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5782–5786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barger, S.; Harmon, A. Microglial activation by alzhelmer amyloid precursor protein and modulation by apolipoprotein E. Nature 1997, 388, 878–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pracht, P.; Bohle, F.; Grimme, S. Automated exploration of the low-energy chemical space with fast quantum chemical methods. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 7169–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spicher, S.; Grimme, S. Robust atomistic modeling of materials, organometallic, and biochemical systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 15665–15673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bannwarth, C.; Ehlert, S.; Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB an accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 1652–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Structures of Compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 1. Structures of Compounds 1 and 2.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 g001
Figure 2. Key 2D NMR correlations of 1 and 2.
Figure 2. Key 2D NMR correlations of 1 and 2.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 g002
Figure 3. The 13C NMR chemical shift calculation results of a pair of C-5 epimers of (5R, 7R, 8S) −1 (1a) and (5S, 7R, 8S) −1 (1b).
Figure 3. The 13C NMR chemical shift calculation results of a pair of C-5 epimers of (5R, 7R, 8S) −1 (1a) and (5S, 7R, 8S) −1 (1b).
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 g003
Figure 4. Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 1.
Figure 4. Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 1.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 g004
Figure 5. ORTEP diagram of Compound 2.
Figure 5. ORTEP diagram of Compound 2.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 g005
Scheme 1. Proposed biosynthetic pathways for 1 and 2.
Scheme 1. Proposed biosynthetic pathways for 1 and 2.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 sch001
Figure 6. Effects of Compound 1 on the proliferation of glucose-induced HRMCs (* p < 0.05, vs. the 30 mM glucose group; *** p < 0.001, vs. the 30 mM glucose group; ## p < 0.01, vs. the control group).
Figure 6. Effects of Compound 1 on the proliferation of glucose-induced HRMCs (* p < 0.05, vs. the 30 mM glucose group; *** p < 0.001, vs. the 30 mM glucose group; ## p < 0.01, vs. the control group).
Pharmaceuticals 16 00452 g006
Table 1. 1H and 13C NMR data of Compound 1.
Table 1. 1H and 13C NMR data of Compound 1.
no.δH (J in Hz) aδC a δH (J in Hz) bδCb
2 184.3 182.6
4 174.3 172.9
5 92.5 90.7
74.13 m85.03.85 dq (6.0, 6.0)82.1
84.14 m76.83.83 ddd (7.2, 6.0, 6.0)75.4
9a2.53 dd (13.5, 5.5)42.02.41 dd (13.2, 6.0)41.2
9b2.06 dd (13.5, 5.0) 1.95 dd (13.2, 7.2)
101.22 d (6.0)19.21.09 d (6.0)18.8
1′ 128.5 126.9
2′7.22 d (8.5)130.97.04 d (8.4)129.7
3′6.69 d (8.5)116.16.62 d (8.4)115.6
4′ 158.1 157.3
5′6.69 d (8.5)116.16.62 d (8.4)115.6
6′7.22 d (8.5)130.97.04 d (8.4)129.7
7′a4.86 overlapped44.54.72 d (15.0)43.3
7′b 4.61 d (15.0)
a 500 MHz for 1H NMR, 125 MHz for 13C NMR, in CD3OD; b 600 MHz for 1H NMR, 150 MHz for 13C NMR, in DMSO-d6. Assignments were determined through a combination of 1D and 2D NMR experiments.
Table 2. 1H and 13C NMR data of compound 2 in CD3OD.
Table 2. 1H and 13C NMR data of compound 2 in CD3OD.
No.δH (J in Hz) aδC a
2 159.3
4 123.6
5 121.5
62.04 s8.8
71.93 s9.1
1′ 128.8
2′7.09 d (8.5)129.6
3′6.71 d (8.5)116.3
4′ 158.1
5′6.71 d (8.5)116.3
6′7.09 d (8.5)129.6
7′5.19 s48.3
a 500 MHz for 1H NMR, 125 MHz for 13C NMR, in CD3OD.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, Y.; Liu, R.; Huang, L.; Huang, Q.; Liu, M.; Liu, S.; Li, J. Spiroleiferthione A and Oleiferthione A: Two Unusual Isothiocyanate-Derived Thioketone Alkaloids from Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16030452

AMA Style

Jiang Y, Liu R, Huang L, Huang Q, Liu M, Liu S, Li J. Spiroleiferthione A and Oleiferthione A: Two Unusual Isothiocyanate-Derived Thioketone Alkaloids from Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(3):452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16030452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Yueping, Rong Liu, Ling Huang, Qi Huang, Min Liu, Shao Liu, and Jing Li. 2023. "Spiroleiferthione A and Oleiferthione A: Two Unusual Isothiocyanate-Derived Thioketone Alkaloids from Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 3: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16030452

APA Style

Jiang, Y., Liu, R., Huang, L., Huang, Q., Liu, M., Liu, S., & Li, J. (2023). Spiroleiferthione A and Oleiferthione A: Two Unusual Isothiocyanate-Derived Thioketone Alkaloids from Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds. Pharmaceuticals, 16(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16030452

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop