Next Article in Journal
Development of Halogenated-Chalcones Bearing with Dimethoxy Phenyl Head as Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Unravelling Potential Health-Beneficial Properties of Corema album Phenolic Compounds: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Binding-Induced Diversity of a Human Telomeric G-Quadruplex Stability Phase Space
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Myrrh Metabolites in Cancer, Inflammation, and Wound Healing: Prospects for a Multi-Targeted Drug Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/ph15091151
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Xylan Prebiotics and the Gut Microbiome Promote Health and Wellbeing: Potential Novel Roles for Pentosan Polysulfate

by
Margaret M. Smith
1 and
James Melrose
1,2,3,*
1
Raymond Purves Laboratory of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Health and Science, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
2
Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
3
Sydney Medical School, Northern Campus, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(9), 1151; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091151
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Pharmacons: Biologically Active Plant-Based Pharmaceuticals 2022)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This narrative review highlights the complexities of the gut microbiome and health-promoting properties of prebiotic xylans metabolized by the gut microbiome. In animal husbandry, prebiotic xylans aid in the maintenance of a healthy gut microbiome. This prevents the colonization of the gut by pathogenic organisms obviating the need for dietary antibiotic supplementation, a practice which has been used to maintain animal productivity but which has led to the emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria that are passed up the food chain to humans. Seaweed xylan-based animal foodstuffs have been developed to eliminate ruminant green-house gas emissions by gut methanogens in ruminant animals, contributing to atmospheric pollution. Biotransformation of pentosan polysulfate by the gut microbiome converts this semi-synthetic sulfated disease-modifying anti-osteoarthritic heparinoid drug to a prebiotic metabolite that promotes gut health, further extending the therapeutic profile and utility of this therapeutic molecule. Xylans are prominent dietary cereal components of the human diet which travel through the gastrointestinal tract as non-digested dietary fibre since the human genome does not contain xylanolytic enzymes. The gut microbiota however digest xylans as a food source. Xylo-oligosaccharides generated in this digestive process have prebiotic health-promoting properties. Engineered commensal probiotic bacteria also have been developed which have been engineered to produce growth factors and other bioactive factors. A xylan protein induction system controls the secretion of these compounds by the commensal bacteria which can promote gut health or, if these prebiotic compounds are transported by the vagal nervous system, may also regulate the health of linked organ systems via the gut–brain, gut–lung and gut–stomach axes. Dietary xylans are thus emerging therapeutic compounds warranting further study in novel disease prevention protocols.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

This study highlights the gut microbiome and how it generates prebiotic metabolites from dietary components with beneficial effects on members of the gut microbiota and linked organ systems in health and disease [1,2,3]. Devani-Davari et al., 2019 [4], state that prebiotics are a group of nutrients that are degraded by gut microbiota, and many additional studies cited in this review show how this leads to the maintenance of the varied cell populations present in the gut microbiome and also has health-related benefits [4]. The term prebiotics should not be confused with the term probiotics. A consensus statement released by the international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics has recommended a definition for the use of the term probiotics [5] as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”. Etymologically the term probiotic is a Greek term meaning “for life”. A prebiotic is “a dietary substrate that is selectively metabolized by the host microbiome to confer a health benefit” [5,6]. Dietary supplements have been suggested to have the ability to combat COVID-19 disease and the gut dysbiosis associated with this condition [7,8] and confectionaries containing phytochemicals with anti SARS CoV-2 activity have even been developed.
Xylans and their microbiome generated metabolites are important prebiotic compounds. The human genome does not encode enzymes with xylanolytic capability, and thus, dietary xylans transit the gastrointestinal tract undegraded, acting as indigestible dietary fibre that promotes throughput of the digested gut contents. However, the intestinal microbiota utilise xylans as a nutrient source and produce xylan metabolites with prebiotic properties that promote gut health. Specific microbiota members have been engineered to produce cytokines, growth factors and other bioactive proteins, and secretion of these compounds can be induced by a xylan induction system [9,10,11]. This is an innovative approach to the treatment of specific diseases and represents a technological revolution through a new therapeutic interface that can be regulated by control of the diet. Thus, therapeutic responses can be effected not only in the gut but also in major linked organ systems such as the liver, lung and brain through the gut–liver [12,13], gut–lung [14,15] and gut–brain [16,17] axes.

2. Xylans Are Abundant Plant Carbohydrates

Xylan is the third most abundant naturally occurring carbohydrate biopolymer on Earth after cellulose and chitin [18]. Xylan is a component of the secondary cell walls of dicotyledonous plants, all cell walls of cereals and a major structural carbohydrate of seaweeds [19]. The human genome does not contain xylanolytic enzymes, and as a consequence, dietary xylans transit through the gastrointestinal tract undegraded. They are a major contributor to the fibre content of foods, serving as a bulking agent which promotes the movement of digested food components through the small and large intestine. The gut microbiota produce a range of xylanolytic enzymes that degrade xylans [20] into prebiotic metabolites that regulate the microbiome and significantly contribute to health and well-being [21]. The intestinal epithelium is important in the maintenance of T cells in the gut. Intraepithelial CD8α T cells in close contact with intestinal epithelial cells and the underlying basement membrane aid in the detection of invasive pathogens. T cell survival depends on β1 integrin interactions with type IV collagen in the basement membrane. Knock-out of β1 integrin expression in CD8α T lymphocytes decreases levels and the migratory properties of intraepithelial T cells in-vivo and the protective responses they provide against pathogenic bacteria. Type IV collagen interactions with β1 integrins on intraepithelial T cells are not only important for T cell survival but the provision of T-cell protective properties in mucosal immunity [22].
The gut microbiome contains 10–100 trillion microorganisms [23] that control the digestion of food and regulate the immune [24,25] and central nervous systems [26] and is also linked to other major organ systems like the liver [27] and lung [28]. Gut dysbiosis is associated with long COVID-19 disease [29] and with secondary antibiotic resistant bacterial infections such as Clostridium difficile that have emerged in the COVID-19 pandemic, [30] adding a further complication in the treatment of long COVID-19 disease. Some members of the microbiome digest fibre [31] and release short-chain fatty acids [32], which regulate gut health providing gut barrier properties; prevent weight gain [33] and lower cholesterol levels [34] and the incidence of diabetes [35], heart disease [36] and the risk of cancer [37,38,39]. Gut commensal bacteria produce a range of xylanolytic enzymes that allow them to utilise dietary xylans as nutrients [20,40]. Long-chain xylans are one of the most common dietary fibres in the human gastrointestinal tract that promote the growth of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum [41]. Xylo-oligosaccharides are prominently generated from xylans by B. pseudocatenulatum, and these have prebiotic properties that counter gut dysbiosis, [41,42] reducing the inflammatory response in the gut induced by obesity [43]. Methods have been developed to prepare xylans and xylo-oligosaccharides to evaluate their potential health benefits [41,44,45,46,47]. Nutraceutical supplements are being developed to combat COVID-19 disease [48,49] and are also of application in the treatment of critically ill patients [50,51,52,53].

2.1. Dietary Xylans

Xylans are complex polysaccharides classified as (i) glucuronoxylans (GXs), (ii) arabinoxylans (AXs) and (iii) glucuronoarabinoxylans (GAXs) based on their constituent monosaccharides [18,54]. Xylans are the second most abundant hemicellulose and represent ~25–35% of the carbohydrate biomass of woody tissues of dicotyledonous plants and lignin rich tissues of monocotyledons, comprising up to 50% by dry weight of grasses and cereal grains. [18,54] Xylans are complex heteropolysaccharides containing a β-(1,4)-glycosidically linked D-xylose backbone, L-arabinose (L-Ara), D-glucuronic acid (D-GlcA), D-GlcA methylated at O-4, or acetyl group [18] side chains (Figure 1a,b). These side chains can be further esterified with acetic and ferulic acids [54]. The type and frequency of these side chains and their modifications vary with the tissue source of the xylan and determine whether the xylan has gel-forming properties in situ or acts as a structural carbohydrate [55] (Figure 1a,b). Xylans in woods and cereal stems are acetylated, and they cross-link cellulose fibres, providing high mechanical support to these tissues [56]. Arabinoxylan in the cereal endosperm has water retention properties and maintains the hydration of the seed head [55]. Seaweed xylans occur as 1,3-β-D-xylans; 1,3:1,4-β-D-xylans and 1,4-β-D-linked xylans, and these are assembled into triple-helical microfibrillar structures that have similar supportive properties to the cellulose fibres found in terrestrial plants [57]. Xylans thus have a variable structure and function depending on their tissue of origin. AX is a prominent gel-forming xylan in the endosperm of cereal seed heads and its hydration properties ensure the viability of the embryo in the aleurone layer is maintained [55]. GAX in the secondary plant cell wall of the cereal stem has a mechanically supportive role and is acetylated and substituted with ferulic acid to variable degree [56]. In addition, ferulic acid esters derived from lignin are also found attached to O-5 of L-Ara in wood xylans and form a linkage group for the xylan to cellulose fibres. Stem and wood xylans also contain α1–2 or α1–3 linked D-GlcA and 4-O-methylated D-GlcA as well as α L-Ara furanose (α L-Araf) and O-acetyl groups attached to the xylan main chain. Wood xylans are more heavily substituted with acetyl and ferulic acids compared to cereal xylans [58].

2.2. Pentosan Polysulfate, a Therapeutic Semi-Synthetic Sulfated Xylan

Pentosan polysulfate (PPS) is a semi-synthetic sulfated xylan produced from beech wood xylan. PPS is heavily sulfated and is referred to as a heparinoid; however, it has a higher charge density than both heparin and heparan sulfate (HS), is less heterogeneous and is a small molecular weight drug (4–6 kDa) (Figure 1c). PPS is a potent disease modifying osteoarthritic drug (DMOAD) [59,60,61], has been used to treat cystitis and painful bowel disorder in humans and has anti-viral properties and potential anti-SARS Cov-2 activity [62,63,64,65]. Approximately one in every ten residues of PPS has a 4-O-methylated D-GlcA side chain linked O-2 to the xylan backbone, but PPS is devoid of the other xylan modifications mentioned above [66].

3. Degradation of Xylans in the Gastrointestinal Tract

The gut microbiota produce xylanolytic enzymes that generate a range of xylan prebiotic metabolites (Figure 1d). Degradation of xylan into xylo oligosaccharides (Figure 1e) and into free xylose requires the combined action of degradative enzymes such as α-L-arabinofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.55), α-D-glucuronidase (EC 3.2.1.139), acetylxylan esterase (EC 3.1.1.72) and ferulic acid esterases (EC 3.1.1.73), which release the side chains from the xylan backbone. Endo-β-1,4-xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) acts synergistically with β-xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.37) to degrade the xylan backbone with the former hydrolysing the internal β-(1,4) linkages of the xylan backbone to produce short xylo-oligosaccharides, and β-xylosidase then removes xylose units from the non-reducing termini of these xylo-oligosaccharides (Figure 1e). β-D-xylosidases are a diverse group of enzymes, and several families of xylosidases have been characterised [67]. The L-Ara, D-GlcA, O-4 Me D-GlcA side chains of xylans provide solubility to the xylan and some protection to enzymatic depolymerisation of the xylan backbone. Ferulic acid modification of L-Ara side chains provides stabilising attachment points for xylans, connecting them to cellulose fibres and providing mechanical stability in plant tissues (Figure 1a,b).
Pharmaceuticals 15 01151 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representations of the diverse features of the structural organisation of hardwood (a) and cereal xylans (b). Representative features are shown using symbol nomenclature for glycans (SNFG). The main xylan chain is β1–4 glycosidically linked. Xylose (D-Xylp) and Glucuronic acid (D-GlcAp) residues occur as pyranose and Arabinose as furanose (L-Araf) ring structures in xylans. Structure of PPS showing its β1–4 linked linear xylan backbone containing a 4-O-methyl glucuronate side chains attached O-2 to every tenth xylose residue of the main chain. R = sulphate groups (c). Xylanolytic enzymes that co-operatively degrade xylans (d) into xylo-oligosaccharides and eventually to xylobiose and then to D-xylose (e). CAZy [68] enzyme families are indicated in brackets.
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representations of the diverse features of the structural organisation of hardwood (a) and cereal xylans (b). Representative features are shown using symbol nomenclature for glycans (SNFG). The main xylan chain is β1–4 glycosidically linked. Xylose (D-Xylp) and Glucuronic acid (D-GlcAp) residues occur as pyranose and Arabinose as furanose (L-Araf) ring structures in xylans. Structure of PPS showing its β1–4 linked linear xylan backbone containing a 4-O-methyl glucuronate side chains attached O-2 to every tenth xylose residue of the main chain. R = sulphate groups (c). Xylanolytic enzymes that co-operatively degrade xylans (d) into xylo-oligosaccharides and eventually to xylobiose and then to D-xylose (e). CAZy [68] enzyme families are indicated in brackets.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01151 g001
Typical xylan side chain structures from beech wood and cereals and their side chains are shown in Figure 2. Xylans are composed of a β1,4-linked D-xylose backbone containing at O-2 and/or O-3 α-L-Araf and acetyl groups, and exclusively at O-2 with GlcA or 4-O-methyl-GlcA (MeGlcA) (Figure 2a–e). Complete enzymatic degradation of xylan requires the co-ordinated action of several enzymes (Figure 1d). The gut microbiome synthesise these xylanolytic enzymes. The xylanases are classified in the CAZy (Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes) database [68] into six different glycosidic hydrolase families, GH5, GH7, GH8, GH1O, GH11 and GH43 (Figure 1d). These differ in specificity, e.g., GH10 xylanases cleave highly substituted xylan chains whereas GH11 only cleaves xylans with at least 3 unsubstituted xylose residues. The CAZy Database (http://www.cazy.org/) is dedicated to the display and analysis of genomic, structural and biochemical information on carbohydrate degradative enzymes [68]. The glucuronidases that hydrolyse the GlcA and MeGlcA decorations on xylan chains are members of the GH67 family [69,70]. Two bacterial phyla, the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, have evolved to degrade complex polysaccharides in the gut such as xylans [71,72,73,74].
Endoxylanases generate prebiotic xylo-oligosaccharides from dietary xylans [20,47]; these promote beneficial symbiont microbes such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus sp. in the human gut and maintain mucosal health and immune function [75,76,77,78]. Xylo-oligosaccharides also inhibit colonization of the gut by pro-inflammatory bacteria, such as Salmonella sp., and promote growth of Roseburia intestinalis, an abundant butyrate-producing Firmicute which improves gut barrier properties, and plasma lipid levels attenuating pro-inflammatory effects of a high fat diet, decreasing LPS levels in blood and LPS-induced IL-1β and IL-13 [78].

3.1. The Xylan Regulon and Production of Xylanolytic Enzymes

The xylan regulon [79] is a cluster of genes in commensal bacteria that encode for a number of xylanolytic enzymes. These genes of the xylan regulon are activated by dietary xylan. Gut commensal bacteria produce a number of endo β-D-xylanase glycohydrolases (GH 30, 10, 11 and 30) which internally cleave β1–4 glycosidically linked xylopyranose residues of the xylan backbone releasing xylo-oligosaccharides. These xylo-oligosaccharides then act as substrates for a family of β-D-xylosidases which release D-xylose monosaccharide units from the non-reducing termini of xylotriose and xylobiose. Other side chain components (depending on xylan source) are released from the xylan backbone by α-L-arabinofuranosidases (GH 43, 51, 54, 62), acetyl esterases (CE 1–7, 12) and α-D-glucuronidases (GH 67,115); GH 1O endoxylanase (Xyn A1) releases arabinoxylobiose, arabinoxylotriose, xylobiose, xylotriose and methylglucuronoxylotriose from glucuronoarabinoxylans (GAXs). Gut commensal bacteria utilize the released monosaccharides as a nutritional source.

3.2. Metabolism of GAGs in the Gut Microbiome and the Essential Roles They Play in Gut Homeostasis

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are constant components in the gut and are present as proteoglycans or as free GAG forms. Some members of the gut microbiome produce GAG depolymerizing enzymes that allow GAGs to be used as nutrient sources by the gut microbiome [80]. Gut bacteria produce a range of sulfatases which are used in the degradation of GAGs including heparin and HS, sulfated neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine, and the hormones melatonin, estrone, dehydroepiandrosterone, and thyroxine [81,82,83]. GAGs have essential roles in the regulation of the colonization and proliferation of beneficial symbiont bacterial populations and the prevention of gut colonization by pathogenic bacteria [84]. Digestion of GAGs such as CS, HS, HA and dietary xylans by the microbiome generates short chain fatty acids that improve gut health [84,85,86,87]. GAGs are one of the most important host glycans that are continuously and abundantly present in the intestine through continuous shedding of proteoglycan from the gut epithelium [88]. In murine gut models, CS disaccharides alter the microbiota increasing the prevalence of Bacteroides acidifaciens [86], a bacterial strain that inhibits pathogenic colonization in the gut via induction of IgA production [89]. Oral administration of other GAGs also elicits beneficial gut responses promoting growth of Lactobacillus bacteria which ensures gut homeostasis [90,91]. Oral HS administered as enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, improves mucosal healing in a murine colitis model [92]. Dietary HS also improves recovery of renal functions in nephrectomized rats [93]. Low molecular weight HA produced by depolymerization of high molecular weight HA has also been shown to reduce membrane permeability associated with colitis [94].
The Bacteroidetes are the second-most abundant bacterial phylum capable of catabolizing a diverse range of polysaccharides, including GAGs, which is attributable to the diverse range of carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes (CAZymes) in their genomes [95,96,97]. Proteus vulgaris, a component of a healthy gut microbiome [98], produces two well-characterized chondroitinase enzymes that are not encoded in the human genome; thus, GAGs are of limited nutritive value to mammalian cells but can be utilized by members of the gut microbiome [99,100,101]. Unlike the Bacteroides, the ability to degrade GAGs is not widely prevalent in other gut phyla. Salyers et al. [102] showed 154 faecal strains of Firmicutes and Bifidobacteria (Actinobacteria) were incapable of metabolizing CS, HA and heparin. Crociani and colleagues [103] also demonstrated that 239 strains of Bifidobacterium were incapable of metabolizing heparin, CS, HA and polygalacturonate, and therefore, the abundant Bacteroidetes with GAG-degradative properties have particularly important roles to play in the maintenance of gut homeostasis.
Pathogenic bacteria can colonize gut tissues using GAGs and PGs as a site of entry to infect host cells [104]. Enteric pathogens such as Toxoplasmosis gondii, E. coli O157:H7 [104] and opportunistic pathogenic Streptococci [105] can utilise GAGs as entry points to infect intestinal cells. Antibiotics used to treat these gastrointestinal pathogens detrimentally affect beneficial gut bacteria and may cause gut dysbiosis. It is therefore essential that beneficial gut bacteria be maintained as dominant symbionts to ensure that pathogenic bacteria do not obtain a niche to colonise the gut microbiome.
Experiments with radiosulfate-labelled PPS (Elmiron) showed it was metabolised into lower molecular weight forms of lower sulfation, with ~50% of orally-administered PPS absorbed and excreted in the faeces; 11% of radiolabelled PPS was excreted by the kidneys, and ~3% of the PPS was discharged in the urine as intact 4–6 kDa PPS [106]. PPS has efficacy in the treatment of cystitis [107] and urinary tract infections, [108] indicating that sufficient bioactive levels of intact PPS were present in the urinary tract to provide a therapeutic effect in urinogenital infections. However, as already discussed, based on the known GAG degrading capability and xylanolytic enzymes produced by gut microbiota members, PPS would also be expected to be converted to prebiotic xylo-oligosaccharides, with roles in the maintenance of gut health extending the therapeutic profile of PPS.
Sodium alginate is a sulfated polymer commonly used as a food additive in Asian cuisines. An analysis of the human gut microbiota for bacteria capable of degrading alginate into its mannuronic and guluronic acid components also revealed specific members of the Bacteroides genus with this capability [109]. Additionally, the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio piger, which colonizes the gut of ∼50% of all humans, would also be expected to contribute to alginate degradation [110,111,112,113,114]. Mammalian cells also produce a number of sulfatases that degrade GAGs and sulfated cerebrosides. These include N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase, N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase, iduronate 2-sulfatase, N-acetylgalactosamine-4-sulfatase, cerebroside sulfatase and N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase [115].

4. Xylans Promote a Healthy Human Microbiome and Linked Organ Systems

Digestion of xylans by the microbiome maintains stable health promoting bacterial symbionts in the gut [116]. Carbohydrate epitopes released from dietary polysaccharides by the microbiota educate the human immune system in infancy, aiding in the provision of tolerance to food types and minimising the development of food allergies in later life [117,118,119,120,121]. The microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract have a close symbiotic relationship with the human host with roles in health maintenance, metabolism of indigestible dietary fibre and synthesis of some vitamins and neurotransmitters [122]. The prevalence of beneficial symbiont species in the gut prevents the colonization of the gut by harmful pathogenic cell populations. The human microbiota of the large intestine are dominated by the Firmicute and Bacteroidetes phyla which represent >90% of the total microbial community [123]. Roseburia intestinalis, a butyrate-producing Firmicute, is also important in gut health [116]. Metagenomic and transcriptomic studies have identified distinctive signatures in gut microbiota in neural disorders such as autism and bipolar disorders [124,125,126]. Machine learning techniques are also now being applied to the diagnosis of diseases from dynamic changes in the gut microbiome [127]. The gut microbiota produce bioactive fragments of polysaccharides that undergo fermentation in the gut, which educate the immune system in infancy [128], and immunomodulatory responses that subsequently develop in later life [129], such as development of immune tolerance to food groups and prevention of food allergies [130]. This is a rapidly evolving area of intensive investigation using powerful technologies across multiple research disciplines. The FLEXIGUT rationale is an integrated -omics data analysis framework designed to understand exposomic associations with food substances that result in chronic low-grade gut inflammation [131]. FLEXIGUT aims to characterize human life-course environmental exposures to specific substances and how they impact on gut inflammation and resultant instructive immune responses. Available evidence shows gut metabolites impact on cell populations in vivo affecting cellular responses to fat storage, hypolipidemia, hypoglycaemia, appetite and disease processes [131].
A human study comparing the impact of diet versus drugs on the control of cellular metabolism found that diet had as strong an impact as drugs on many cellular processes and diseases such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease and neurological diseases [126,132,133,134,135,136]. Diet is a powerful medicine, involving nutrient-signalling pathways effecting the gut microbiome [137]. The formation of a healthy microbiome in early childhood is important for the establishment and maintenance of human health in later life. The full impact of the gut microbiome on the attainment of tolerance to certain foods and the neurological pathways that train innate immune responses and how these impact on allergic and autoimmune disorders however is incompletely understood [117,118,119,120,121].

5. Manipulation of the Microbiome Increases Farm Animal Productivity

5.1. Use of Recombinant Xylanase as a Food Additive for Monogastric Farm Animals Improves Feedstuff Utilization and Animal Productivity

Australian ruminants have an extensive microbiome containing bacteria which produce a vast repertoire of digestive enzymes that can efficiently degrade native Australian grasses that have a high lignin and xylan content. A recombinant β-D-xylanase (Ronozyme® wx2000) has been developed as a feedstuff additive to unlock the nutritive properties of xylans in foodstuffs for monogastric farmland animals to improve the nutrient yield of corns and cereals commonly used as foodstuffs for poultry and pigs [138,139,140,141]. This results in increased performance and optimal growth of these animals, improves food efficiency, and reduces production of waste products and emissions. An increased gut health in terms of elimination of harmful bacterial populations in the gut microbiome also translates into healthier more productive animals.

5.2. Elimination of Antibiotic Supplementation in Animal Foodstuffs

The use of prebiotic-generated phytonutrients has been shown to represent an alternative to the use of antibiotics to maintain animal productivity [142]. Prebiotic-generated phytochemicals have been proposed as an ideal alternative to the use of antibiotics in the poultry industry [143]. Dietary xylo-oligosaccharide supplements and xylanase additives increase body weight gain and beneficial gut fermentation metabolites in broiler chickens fed on corn-based diets leading to improved feed utilization and gut health and a reduced need for the use of dietary antibiotics [144]. Ferulic acid (FA), a major phenolic metabolite of plant hemicelluloses, released upon degradation of these carbohydrates by gut microbiota, protects against oxidative stress and inflammation in the gut, promoting animal health and more efficient feedstuff utilization. FA also decreases serum interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels and their impact on gut inflammation, which inhibit animal growth and commercial productivity. FA also increases the growth of beneficial symbionts such as the gut Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The alleviation of inflammation and oxidative stress by FA and its ability to maintain a healthy gut microbiome results in the superior performance of farm animals on feedstuffs they would normally digest poorly without help from the gut microbiota [145]. Metagenomics has been used to examine the chicken microbiome genome to better understand how it impacts on health and weight gain efficiency. As in humans, the microbial populations in chicken gut modulate metabolic functions, feed efficiency and health due to the chicken’s ability to digest carbohydrates. This not only produces growth promoting energy-rich metabolites but also aids in the homeostasis of a healthy microbiome [146]. The bovine rumen microbial community also harbours potent carbohydrate-digestive enzyme systems that are particularly efficient in the digestion of plant biomass [147]. The intestinal microbiota are also recognized to have important roles to play in healthy piglet development through effects on intestinal maturation, education of the immune system and development of tolerance to new foodstuffs improving piglet health and growth performance [148].

5.3. Manipulation of the Gut Microbiome to Reduce Methane Emissions and Atmospheric Pollution by Ruminant Animals

Agriculture is the largest contributor to global methane emissions, and ruminants (cattle, sheep and goats) are the dominant animal contributors. Carbon emissions from agriculture contribute around 13% of the carbon footprint of Australia, and of these, 43% are from methane produced by ruminant animals. Methane emissions are estimated to increase 30% by 2050 if current agricultural practices are not amended, yet few countries have set methane reduction targets. Rumen microbiota (methanogens) produce methane from the fermentation of polysaccharides that is then belched out into the atmosphere. Seaweed-based animal feedstuffs are rich in prebiotic hemicelluloses, including xylans, which constitute 25–30% of their carbohydrate biomass. This seaweed-based feedstuff promotes the growth of beneficial symbiont gut bacterial populations and eliminates colonization of the gut microbiome by pathogenic cell populations [149,150,151] or methanogens that generate methane [152,153]. A collaboration between Meat & Livestock Australia and James Cook University has developed a cost-effective seaweed foodstuff called FutureFeed [154]. This utilizes a native Australian seaweed in a nutritious animal foodstuff product that significantly reduces methane emissions from ruminant livestock but concomitantly increases livestock productivity and the quality of meat production. Methane is the second most abundant greenhouse gas after CO2 and is present at ~20% of the levels reported for atmospheric CO2. Methane however is 25–80 times more effective than CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere. A significant reduction in methane emissions from ruminant livestock can thus make a significant positive contribution towards improvement in global atmospherics contributing to a slowing down of global climate change with no loss in agricultural productivity.

5.4. The Health Promoting Properties of Xylo-Oligosaccharide Prebiotics in the Treatment of Human Gut Dysbiosis

Xylo-oligosaccharides are an emerging prebiotic which promote gut health [155], countering the gut inflammation which occurs after antibiotic treatment and the recovery of beneficial Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Firmicutes cell populations in the gut microbiome, previously depleted by antibiotic treatment [76,156]. Re-establishing these gut bacterial populations also prevents colonization of the gut by pathogenic bacterial cell populations [156] and has been found to have beneficial properties associated with the treatment of neurological disorders of cognitive decline through the gut–brain axis [157,158].

5.5. The Use of Engineered Commensal Bacteria to Deliver Bioactive Therapeutic Compounds Controlled by a Xylan Protein Induction System

Engineered commensal food-grade bacteria have been developed for the delivery of anti-inflammatory cytokines and other biologically active molecules in the gut. Lactococcus lactis has been engineered to co-express tetanus toxin, murine IL-2 or IL-6, a novel vaccination route [159]. The L. lactis system secretes active IL-10 as a delivery system in inflammatory bowel disease models and in patients with Crohn’s disease [160]. L. lactis is not a colonizing bacterium and, combined with limited bioactive growth factor half-lives, repeat therapeutic dosing strategies are required for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [161,162]. An alternative strategy has been developed using engineered Bacteroides ovatus, a commensal anaerobic Gram-negative bacterium of the colon. Growth factor secretion is regulated by a xylan induction system [163,164,165,166,167]. Keratinocyte growth factor-2 (KGF-2) and TGF-β are epithelial growth factors with immunoregulatory properties of therapeutic value in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The use of engineered B. ovatus for focal delivery of KGF-2 and TGF-β has considerable potential in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Bacteroides spp. are prominent commensal anaerobes found in the mucin layer coating the colonic mucosa and thus ideally placed for therapeutic protein delivery to the injured epithelium. The ability of B. ovatus to utilise xylan as its sole carbon source contributes to its predominance as a representative of the colon microbiota. Desulfated PPS is also capable of acting as a xylan for induction of selected proteins by the gut microbiota. This represents a novel level of therapeutic sophistication for PPS. This aspect of the prebiotic therapeutic application of PPS warrants further evaluation.

6. Conclusions

Microbiome enzyme systems of the human gut are capable of degrading dietary xylans generating prebiotic metabolites. PPS, a semi-synthetic xylan heparinoid is an efficacious DMOAD that has also been used in the treatment of cystitis and painful bladder disorders and as an anti-arthritic. Biotransformation of PPS by the gut microbiota converts it to a health promoting xylan prebiotic extending its therapeutic profile. Xylan derived oligosaccharides produced by the gut microbiome are emerging agents in the promotion of human health. These have been examined in the treatment of a number of chronic conditions affecting the brain, liver and lung tissues through the gut–brain, gut–liver and gut–lung axes which are served by the vagus nerve which provides a regulatory two-way communication system for the autonomic and parasympathetic nervous systems. These novel prebiotic procedures display significant beneficial therapeutic potential warranting further experimental examination in what represents a new therapeutic frontier.

Author Contributions

J.M. devised the study, J.M. and M.M.S. shared in the writing and editing of the manuscript and both approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by The Melrose Personal Research Fund, Sydney.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The University of Sydney and Royal Northshore Hospital are acknowledged for the infrastructure support they provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict to report. M.M.S. and J.M. have both received consultancy fees from Sylvan Scientific Pty Ltd.; however, this company had no input into the design and interpretation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Bonaz, B.; Bazin, T.; Pellissier, S. The Vagus Nerve at the Interface of the Microbio-ta-Gut-Brain Axis. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Forsythe, P.; Bienenstock, J.; Kunze, W.A. Vagal pathways for microbiome-brain-gut axis communication. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 817, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Fülling, C.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Gut Microbe to Brain Signaling: What Happens in Vagus…. Neuron 2019, 101, 998–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, S.J.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Foods 2019, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gibson, G.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, M.; Kamal, M.M.; Rahman, M.H.; Siddiqui, M.N.; Haque, M.A.; Saha, K.K.; Rahman, M.A. Functional dairy products as a source of bioactive peptides and probiotics: Current trends and future prospectives. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 1263–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, S.; Kola, P.; Kaur, D.; Singla, G.; Mishra, V.; Panesar, P.S.; Mallikarjunan, K.; Krishania, M. Therapeutic Potential of Nutraceuticals and Dietary Supplements in the Prevention of Viral Diseases: A Review. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 679312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, J.; Tian, C.; Diamond, S.; Glass, N.L. Deciphering transcriptional regulatory mechanisms associated with hemicellulose degradation in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tauzin, A.; Laville, E.; Xiao, Y.; Nouaille, S.; Le Bourgeois, P.; Heux, S.; Portais, J.C.; Monsan, P.; Martens, E.C.; Potocki-Veronese, G.; et al. Functional characterization of a gene locus from an uncultured gut Bacteroides conferring xylo-oligosaccharides utilization to Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2016, 102, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Z.; Raza, M.F.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Dong, X.; Zhang, H. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis ZY-1-1 reveals the genetic basis for its hemicellulosic/cellulosic substrate-inducible xylanase and cellulase activities. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bruneau, A.; Hundertmark, J.; Guillot, A.; Tacke, F. Molecular and Cellular Mediators of the Gut-Liver Axis in the Progression of Liver Diseases. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 725390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zheng, Z.; Wang, B. The Gut-Liver Axis in Health and Disease: The Role of Gut Microbiota-Derived Signals in Liver Injury and Regeneration. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 775526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Aishwarya, K.G.; Anita-Margret, M. Intermodulation of gut-lung axis microbiome and the implications of biotics to combat COVID-19. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 26, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gokulan, K.; Joshi, M.; Khare, S.; Bartter, T. Lung microbiome, gut-lung axis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2022, 28, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Angoorani, P.; Ejtahed, H.S.; Siadat, S.D.; Sharifi, F.; Larijani, B. Is There Any Link between Cognitive Impairment and Gut Microbiota? A Systematic Review. Gerontology 2022, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, L.; Huh, J.R.; Shah, K. Microbiota and the gut-brain-axis: Implications for new therapeutic design in the CNS. eBioMedicine 2022, 77, 103908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Scheller, H.; Ulvskov, P. Hemicelluloses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 263–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hsieh, Y.; Harris, P.J. Xylans of Red and Green Algae: What Is Known about Their Structures and How They Are Synthesised? Polymers 2019, 11, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, M.; Chekan, J.R.; Dodd, D.; Hong, P.Y.; Radlinski, L.; Revindran, V.; Nair, S.K.; Mackie, R.I.; Cann, I. Xylan utilization in human gut commensal bacteria is orchestrated by unique modular organization of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E3708–E3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Baker, J.; Duarte, M.E.; Holanda, D.M.; Kim, S.W. Friend or Foe? Impacts of Dietary Xylans, Xylooligosaccharides, and Xylanases on Intestinal Health and Growth Performance of Monogastric Animals. Animals 2021, 11, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Seo, G.; Takahashi, D.; Wang, Q.; Mikulski, Z.; Chen, A.; Chou, T.F.; Marcovecchio, P.; McArdle, S.; Sethi, A.; Shui, J.W.; et al. Epithelial HVEM maintains intraepithelial T cell survival and contributes to host protection. Sci. Immunol. 2022, 7, eabm6931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ursell, L.; Metcalf, J.L.; Parfrey, L.W.; Knight, R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70, S38–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rooks, M.; Garrett, W.S. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Levy, M.; Kolodziejczyk, A.A.; Thaiss, C.A.; Elinav, E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cryan, J.; Dinan, T.G. Mind-altering microorganisms: The impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Park, J.; Kim, S.E.; Lee, N.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Jung, J.H.; Jang, M.K.; Park, S.H.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, D.J.; Kim, H.S.; et al. Role of Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, C.; Yu, C.H.; Yu, W.Y.; Ying, H.Z. Gut-Lung Microbiota in Chronic Pulmonary Diseases: Evolution, Pathogenesis, and Therapeutics. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 2021, 9278441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Giannos, P.; Prokopidis, K. Gut Dysbiosis and Long COVID-19: Feeling Gutted. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 2917–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Linares-García, L.; Cárdenas-Barragán, M.E.; Hernández-Ceballos, W.; Pérez-Solano, C.S.; Morales-Guzmán, A.S.; Miller, D.S.; Schmulson, M. Bacterial and Fungal Gut Dysbiosis and Clostridium difficile in COVID-19: A Review. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2022, 56, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Slavin, J. Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1417–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ríos-Covián, D.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M.; de Los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Salazar, N. Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and their Link with Diet and Human Health. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Howarth, N.; Saltzman, E.; Roberts, S.B. Dietary fiber and weight regulation. Nutr. Rev. 2001, 59, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brown, L.; Rosner, B.; Willett, W.W.; Sacks, F.M. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 69, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. InterAct-Consortium. Dietary fibre and incidence of type 2 diabetes in eight European countries: The EPIC-InterAct Study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 1394–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, H.; Chiou, J. Potential Benefits of Probiotics and Prebiotics for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Artemev, A.; Naik, S.; Pougno, A.; Honnavar, P.; Shanbhag, N.M. The Association of Microbiome Dysbiosis with Colorectal Cancer. Cureus 2022, 14, e22156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chattopadhyay, I.; Gundamaraju, R.; Jha, N.K.; Gupta, P.K.; Dey, A.; Mandal, C.C.; Ford, B.M. Interplay between Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiome, Lipid Metabolism, and Tumorigenesis: Can Gut Dysbiosis Stand as a Prognostic Marker in Cancer? Dis. Markers 2022, 2022, 2941248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kouzu, K.; Tsujimoto, H.; Kishi, Y.; Ueno, H.; Shinomiya, N. Bacterial Translocation in Gastrointestinal Cancers and Cancer Treatment. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hao, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Tu, T.; Zhang, J.; Luo, H.; Huang, H.; Su, X. PUL-Mediated Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharide Utilization in the Gut Bacteroidetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Pi, Y.; Gerrits, W.J.J.; de Vries, S.; Shang, L.; Tao, S.; Zhang, S.; Han, D.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Xylan alleviates dietary fiber deprivation-induced dysbiosis by selectively promoting Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum in pigs. Microbiome 2021, 9, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singh, E.; Banerjee, J.; Arora, T. Prebiotic potential of oligosaccharides: A focus on xylan derived oligosaccharides. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2015, 5, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moya-Pérez, A.; Neef, A.; Sanz, Y. Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum CECT 7765 Reduces Obesity-Associated Inflammation by Restoring the Lymphocyte-Macrophage Balance and Gut Microbiota Structure in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Saville, B.A.; Saville, S.H. Functional Attributes and Health Benefits of Novel Prebiotic Oligosaccharides Derived from Xylan, Arabinan, and Mannan; InTech Open: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Y.; Xie, Y.; Ajuwon, K.M.; Zhong, R.; Li, T.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Beckers, Y.; Everaert, N. Xylo-Oligosaccharides, Preparation and Application to Human and Animal Health: A Review. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 731930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kumar, R.; Sood, U.; Gupta, V.; Singh, M.; Scaria, J.; Lal, R. Recent Advancements in the Development of Modern Probiotics for Restoring Human Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis. Indian J. Microbiol. 2020, 60, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nordberg Karlsson, E.; Schmitz, E.; Linares-Pastén, J.A.; Adlercreutz, P. Endo-xylanases as tools for production of substituted xylooligosaccharides with prebiotic properties. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 9081–9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ghidoli, M.; Colombo, F.; Sangiorgio, S.; Landoni, M.; Giupponi, L.; Nielsen, E.; Pilu, R. Food Containing Bioactive Flavonoids and Other Phenolic or Sulfur Phytochemicals With Antiviral Effect: Can We Design a Promising Diet Against COVID-19? Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 661331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Subedi, L.; Tchen, S.; Gaire, B.P.; Hu, B.; Hu, K. Adjunctive Nutraceutical Therapies for COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Davison, J.; Wischmeyer, P.E. Probiotic and synbiotic therapy in the critically ill: State of the art. Nutrition 2019, 59, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Manzanares, W.; Lemieux, M.; Langlois, P.L.; Wischmeyer, P.E. Probiotic and synbiotic therapy in critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2016, 19, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Moron, R.; Galvez, J.; Colmenero, M.; Anderson, P.; Cabeza, J.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E. The Importance of the Microbiome in Critically Ill Patients: Role of Nutrition. Nutrients 2019, 11, 3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wischmeyer, P.; McDonald, D.; Knight, R. Role of the microbiome, probiotics, and ‘dysbiosis therapy’ in critical illness. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2016, 22, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Faik, A. Xylan biosynthesis: News from the grass. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jamme, F.; Rogniaux, H.; Saulnier, L.; Guillon, F. The endosperm cavity of wheat grains contains a highly hydrated gel of arabinoxylan. Plant Sci. 2021, 306, 110845. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, L.; Gao, C.; Mentink-Vigier, F.; Tang, L.; Zhang, D.; Wang, S.; Cao, S.; Xu, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, T.; et al. Arabinosyl Deacetylase Modulates the Arabinoxylan Acetylation Profile and Secondary Wall Formation? Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1113–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Viana, A.; Noseda, M.D.; Gonçalves, A.G.; Duarte, M.E.; Yokoya, N.; Matulewicz, M.C.; Cerezo, A.S. β-D-(1→4), β-D-(1→3) ‘mixed linkage’ xylans from red seaweeds of the order Nemaliales and Palmariales. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pawar, P.; Koutaniemi, S.; Tenkanen, M.; Mellerowicz, E.J. Acetylation of woody lignocellulose: Significance and regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ghosh, P. The pathobiology of osteoarthritis and the rationale for the use of pentosan polysulfate for its treatment. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 28, 211–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ghosh, P.; Edelman, J.; March, L.; Smith, M. Effects of pentosan polysulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Curr. Ther. Res. Clin. Exp. 2005, 66, 552–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kumagai, K.; Shirabe, S.; Miyata, N.; Murata, M.; Yamauchi, A.; Kataoka, Y.; Niwa, M. Sodium pentosan polysulfate resulted in cartilage improvement in knee osteoarthritis—An open clinical trial. BMC Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Anand, R.; Nayyar, S.; Galvin, T.A.; Merril, C.R.; Bigelow, L.B. Sodium pentosan polysulfate (PPS), an anti-HIV agent also exhibits synergism with AZT, lymphoproliferative activity, and virus enhancement. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 1990, 6, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Herrero, L.; Foo, S.S.; Sheng, K.C.; Chen, W.; Forwood, M.R.; Bucala, R.; Mahalingam, S. Pentosan Polysulfate: A Novel Glycosaminoglycan-Like Molecule for Effective Treatment of Alphavirus-Induced Cartilage Destruction and Inflammatory Disease. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 8063–8076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ma, G.; Yasunaga, J.I.; Ohshima, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Matsuoka, M. Pentosan Polysulfate Demonstrates Anti-human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Activities In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00413–e00419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, F.; He, P.; Rodrigues, A.L.; Jeske, W.; Tandon, R.; Bates, J.T.; Bierdeman, M.A.; Fareed, J.; Dordick, J.; Linhardt, R.J. Potential anti SARS CoV-2 activity of pentosan polysulphate and mucopolysaccharide polysulphate. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lin, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xia, K.; Zhang, X.; Linhardt, R. Bottom-up and top-down profiling of pentosan polysulfate. Analyst 2019, 144, 4781–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rohman, A.; Dijkstra, B.W.; Puspaningsih, N.N.T. β-Xylosidases: Structural Diversity, Catalytic Mechanism, and Inhibition by Monosaccharides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cantarel, B.L.; Coutinho, P.M.; Rancurel, C.; Bernard, T.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy). An expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–D238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nagy, T.; Nurizzo, D.; Davies, G.J.; Biely, P.; Lakey, J.H.; Bolam, D.N.; Gilbert, H.J. The beta-D-glucuronidase, GlcA67A, of Cellvibrio japonicas utilizes the carboxylate and methyl groups of aldobiouronic acid as important substrate recognition determinants. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 20286–20292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nurizzo, D.; Nagy, T.; Gilbert, H.J.; Davies, G.J. The structural basis for catalysis and specificity of the Pseudomonas cellulosa glucuronidase, GlcA67A. Structure 2002, 10, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Koupenova, M.; Corkrey, H.A.; Vitseva, O.; Tanriverdi, K.; Somasundaran, M.; Liu, P.; Soofi, S.; Bhandari, R.; Godwin, M.; Parsi, K.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Initiates Programmed Cell Death in Platelets. Circ. Res. 2021, 129, 631–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mendis, M.; Leclerc, E.; Simsek, S. Arabinoxylans, gut microbiota and immunity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 139, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pereira, G.; Abdel-Hamid, A.M.; Dutta, S.; D’Alessandro-Gabazza, C.N.; Wefers, D.; Farris, J.A.; Bajaj, S.; Wawrzak, Z.; Atomi, H.; Mackie, R.I.; et al. Degradation of complex arabinoxylans by human colonic Bacteroidetes. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Turnbaugh, P.; Hamady, M.; Yatsunenko, T.; Cantarel, B.L.; Duncan, A.; Ley, R.E.; Sogin, M.L.; Jones, W.J.; Roe, B.A.; Affourtit, J.P.; et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009, 457, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Childs, C.; Röytiö, H.; Alhoniemi, E.; Fekete, A.A.; Forssten, S.D.; Hudjec, N.; Lim, Y.N.; Steger, C.J.; Yaqoob, P.; Tuohy, K.M.; et al. Xylo-oligosaccharides alone or in synbiotic combination with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis induce bifidogenesis and modulate markers of immune function in healthy adults: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, factorial cross-over study. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 1945–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Christensen, E.; Licht, T.R.; Leser, T.D.; Bahl, M.I. Dietary xylo-oligosaccharide stimulates intestinal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli but has limited effect on intestinal integrity in rats. BMC Res. Notes 2014, 7, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Majumdar, S.; Bhattacharyya, D.K.; Bhowal, J. Evaluation of nutraceutical application of xylooligosaccharide enzymatically produced from cauliflower stalk for its value addition through a sustainable approach. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 5501–5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Pi, Y.; Han, D.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. Xylo-oligosaccharide alleviates Salmonella induced inflammation by stimulating Bifidobacterium animalis and inhibiting Salmonella colonization. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chow, V.; Nong, G.; St John, F.J.; Sawhney, N.; Rice, J.D.; Preston, J.F. Bacterial xylan utilization regulons: Systems for coupling depolymerization of methylglucuronoxylans with assimilation and metabolism. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 49, kuab080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kawai, K.; Kamochi, R.; Oiki, S.; Murata, K.; Hashimoto, W. Probiotics in human gut microbiota can degrade host glycosaminoglycans. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cartmell, A.; Lowe, E.C.; Baslé, A.; Firbank, S.J.; Ndeh, D.A.; Murray, H.; Terrapon, N.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B.; Turnbull, J.E.; et al. How members of the human gut microbiota overcome the sulfation problem posed by glycosaminoglycans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 7037–7042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Egan, M.; Jiang, H.; O’Connell Motherway, M.; Oscarson, S.; van Sinderen, D. Glycosulfatase-Encoding Gene Cluster in Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 6611–6623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Ervin, S.; Simpson, J.B.; Gibbs, M.E.; Creekmore, B.C.; Lim, L.; Walton, W.G.; Gharaibeh, R.Z.; Redinbo, M.R. Structural Insights into Endobiotic Reactivation by Human Gut Microbiome-Encoded Sulfatases. Biochemistry 2020, 59, 3939–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rawat, P.; Seyed Hameed, A.S.; Meng, X.; Liu, W. Utilization of glycosaminoglycans by the human gut microbiota: Participating bacteria and their enzymatic machineries. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2068367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Coker, J.; Moyne, O.; Rodionov, D.A.; Zengler, K. Carbohydrates great and small, from dietary fiber to sialic acids: How glycans influence the gut microbiome and affect human health. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1869502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liu, F.; Zhang, N.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Shi, H.; Xue, C.; Li, R.W.; Tang, Q. Chondroitin sulfate disaccharides modified the structure and function of the murine gut microbiome under healthy and stressed conditions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pan, L.; Ai, X.; Fu, T.; Ren, L.; Shang, Q.; Li, G.; Yu, G. In vitro fermentation of hyaluronan by human gut microbiota: Changes in microbiota community and potential degradation mechanism. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 269, 118313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, S.; He, Y.; Hu, Z.; Lu, S.; Yin, X.; Ma, X.; Lv, C.; Jin, G. Heparanase Mediates Intestinal Inflammation and Injury in a Mouse Model of Sepsis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2017, 65, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yanagibashi, T.; Hosono, A.; Oyama, A.; Tsuda, M.; Suzuki, A.; Hachimura, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Momose, Y.; Itoh, K.; Hirayama, K.; et al. IgA production in the large intestine is modulated by a different mechanism than in the small intestine: Bacteroides acidifaciens promotes IgA production in the large intestine by inducing germinal center formation and increasing the number of IgA + B cells. Immunobiology 2013, 218, 645–651. [Google Scholar]
  90. Duan, R.; Chen, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, T.; Ling, P. Oral administration of heparin or heparosan increases the Lactobacillus population in gut microbiota of rats. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shang, Q.; Li, Q.; Zhang, M.; Song, G.; Shi, J.; Jiang, H.; Cai, C.; Hao, J.; Li, G.; Yu, G. Dietary keratan sulfate from shark cartilage modulates gut microbiota and increases the abundance of lactobacillus spp. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Floer, M.; Götte, M.; Wild, M.K.; Heidemann, J.; Gassar, E.S.; Domschke, W.; Kiesel, L.; Luegering, A.; Kucharzik, T. Enoxaparin improves the course of dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in syndecan-1-deficient mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Barsotti, G.; Cupisti, A.; Gervasi, G.; Bartoli, C.; Barsotti, M.; Pasquariello, A.; Moriconi, L.; Giovannetti, S. Effects of oral administration of heparan sulphate in the rat remnant kidney model. Nephron 1999, 81, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kim, Y.; Kessler, S.P.; Obery, D.R.; Homer, C.R.; McDonald, C.; de la Motte, C.A. Hyaluronan 35kDa treatment protects mice from Citrobacter rodentium infection and induces epithelial tight junction protein ZO-1 in vivo. Matrix Biol. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 2017, 62, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. El Kaoutari, A.; Armougom, F.; Gordon, J.I.; Raoult, D.; Henrissat, B. The abundance and variety of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the human gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Salyers, A.; Vercellotti, J.R.; West, S.E.; Wilkins, T.D. Fermentation of mucin and plant polysaccharides by strains of Bacteroides from the human colon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 33, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sonnenburg, J.; Xu, J.; Leip, D.D.; Chen, C.-H.; Westover, B.P.; Weatherford, J.; Buhler, J.D.; Gordon, J.I. Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science 2005, 307, 1955–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hamai, A.; Hashimoto, N.; Mochizuki, H.; Kato, F.; Makiguchi, Y.; Horie, K.; Suzuki, S. Two distinct chondroitin sulfate ABC lyases: An endoeliminase yielding tetrasaccharides and an exoeliminase preferentially acting on oligosaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 9123–9130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Drzewiecka, D. Significance and roles of Proteus spp. bacteria in natural environments. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 741–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Prabhakar, V.; Capila, I.; Bosques, C.J.; Pojasek, K.; Sasisekharan, R. Chondroitinase ABC I from Proteus vulgaris: Cloning, recombinant expression and active site identification. Biochem. J. 2005, 386, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Prabhakar, V.; Capila, I.; Soundararajan, V.; Raman, R.; Sasisekharan, R. Recombinant expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of chondroitinase ABC II from Proteus vulgaris. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 974–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Salyers, A.; West, S.E.; Vercellotti, J.R.; Wilkins, T.D. Fermentation of mucins and plant polysaccharides by anaerobic bacteria from the human colon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 34, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Crociani, F.; Alessandrini, A.; Mucci, M.M.; Biavati, B. Degradation of complex carbohydrates by Bifidobacterium spp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994, 24, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kato, K.; Ishiwa, A. The role of carbohydrates in infection strategies of enteric pathogens. Trop. Med. Health 2015, 43, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Henry-Stanley, M.; Hess, D.J.; Erlandsen, S.L.; Wells, C.L. Ability of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan-1 to participate in bacterial translocation across the intestinal epithelial barrier. Shock 2005, 24, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Simon, M.; McClanahan, R.H.; Shah, J.F.; Repko, T.; Modi, N.B. Metabolism of [3H]pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) in healthy human volunteers. Xenobiotica 2005, 35, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Taneja, R. Current status of oral pentosan polysulphate in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020, 32, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tseng, C.; Chang, S.J.; Meng, E.; Chang, H.C.; Lee, Y.J. The efficacy of pentosan polysulfate monotherapy for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections in women: A multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2020, 119, 1314–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, M.; Li, G.; Shang, Q.; Chen, X.; Liu, W.; Pi, X.; Zhu, L.; Yin, Y.; Yu, G.; Wang, X. In vitro fermentation of alginate and its derivatives by human gut microbiota. Anaerobe 2016, 39, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Barbeyron, T.; Brillet-Guéguen, L.; Carré, W.; Carrière, C.; Caron, C.; Czjzek, M.; Hoebeke, M.; Michel, G. Matching the Diversity of Sulfated Biomolecules: Creation of a Classification Database for Sulfatases Reflecting Their Substrate Specificity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hansen, E.; Lozupone, C.A.; Rey, F.E.; Wu, M.; Guruge, J.L.; Narra, A.; Goodfellow, J.; Zaneveld, J.R.; McDonald, D.T.; Goodrich, J.A.; et al. Pan-genome of the dominant human gut-associated archaeon, Methanobrevibacter smithii, studied in twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. 1), 4599–4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nava, G.; Carbonero, F.; Croix, J.A.; Greenberg, E.; Gaskins, H.R. Abundance and diversity of mucosa-associated hydrogenotrophic microbes in the healthy human colon. ISME J. 2012, 6, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rey, F.; Gonzalez, M.D.; Cheng, J.; Wu, M.; Ahern, P.P.; Gordon, J.I. Metabolic niche of a prominent sulfate-reducing human gut bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13582–13587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Stewart, J.; Chadwick, V.S.; Murray, A. Carriage, quantification, and predominance of methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in faecal samples. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 43, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sardiello, M.; Annunziata, I.; Roma, G.; Ballabio, A. Sulfatases and sulfatase modifying factors: An exclusive and promiscuous relationship. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 3203–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Leth, M.; Ejby, M.; Workman, C.; Ewald, D.A.; Pedersen, S.S.; Sternberg, C.; Bahl, M.I.; Licht, T.R.; Aachmann, F.L.; Westereng, B.; et al. Differential bacterial capture and transport preferences facilitate co-growth on dietary xylan in the human gut. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Di Costanzo, M.; De Paulis, N.; Biasucci, G. Butyrate: A Link between Early Life Nutrition and Gut Microbiome in the Development of Food Allergy. Life 2021, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Méndez, C.; Bueno, S.M.; Kalergis, A.M. Contribution of Gut Microbiota to Immune Tolerance in Infants. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 7823316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Riazi-Rad, F.; Behrouzi, A.; Mazaheri, H.; Katebi, A.; Ajdary, S. Impact of gut microbiota on immune system. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2021, 68, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wagner, C.; Torow, N.; Hornef, M.W.; Lelouard, H. Spatial and temporal key steps in early-life intestinal immune system development and education. FEBS J. 2021, 289, 4731–4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yokanovich, L.; Newberry, R.D.; Knoop, K.A. Regulation of oral antigen delivery early in life: Implications for oral tolerance and food allergy. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2021, 51, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Jandhyala, S.; Talukdar, R.; Subramanyam, C.; Vuyyuru, H.; Sasikala, M.; Nageshwar Reddy, D. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 8787–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Lai, J.; Li, A.; Jiang, J.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, P.; Xi, C.; Wu, L.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Lu, J.; et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals gut bacterial signatures for diagnosis and treatment outcome prediction in bipolar depression. Psychiatry Res. 2022, 307, 114326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Levi Mortera, S.; Vernocchi, P.; Basadonne, I.; Zandonà, A.; Chierici, M.; Durighello, M.; Marzano, V.; Gardini, S.; Gasbarrini, A.; Urbani, A.; et al. A metaproteomic-based gut microbiota profiling in children affected by autism spectrum disorders. J. Proteom. 2022, 251, 104407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sorboni, S.; Moghaddam, H.S.; Jafarzadeh-Esfehani, R.; Soleimanpour, S. A Comprehensive Review on the Role of the Gut Microbiome in Human Neurological Disorders. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 35, e00338-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Curry, K.; Nute, M.G.; Treangen, T.J. It takes guts to learn: Machine learning techniques for disease detection from the gut microbiome. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2021, 5, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jain, N. The early life education of the immune system: Moms, microbes and (missed) opportunities. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1824564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gomaa, E. Human gut microbiota/microbiome in health and diseases: A review. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 2019–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Kreft, L.; Hoffmann, C.; Ohnmacht, C. Therapeutic Potential of the Intestinal Microbiota for Immunomodulation of Food Allergies. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Pero-Gascon, R.; Hemeryck, L.Y.; Poma, G.; Falony, G.; Nawrot, T.S.; Raes, J.; Vanhaecke, L.; De Boevre, M.; Covaci, A.; De Saeger, S. FLEXiGUT: Rationale for exposomics associations with chronic low-grade gut inflammation. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Berding, K.; Cryan, J.F. Microbiota-targeted interventions for mental health. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2022, 35, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Calabrese, F.; Porrelli, A.; Vacca, M.; Comte, B.; Nimptsch, K.; Pinart, M.; Pischon, T.; Pujos-Guillot, E.; De Angelis, M. Metaproteomics Approach and Pathway Modulation in Obesity and Diabetes: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021, 14, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Lefèvre-Arbogast, S.; Thomas, A.; Samieri, C. Dietary factors and brain health. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2022, 33, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Sihag, J.; Di Marzo, V. (Wh)olistic (E)ndocannabinoidome-Microbiome-Axis Modulation through (N)utrition (WHEN) to Curb Obesity and Related Disorders. Lipids Health Dis. 2022, 21, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Walker, R.; Vlamakis, H.; Lee, J.W.J.; Besse, L.A.; Xanthakis, V.; Vasan, R.S.; Shaw, S.Y.; Xavier, R.J. Population study of the gut microbiome: Associations with diet, lifestyle, and cardiometabolic disease. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wali, J.; Milner, A.J.; Luk, A.W.S.; Pulpitel, T.J.; Dodgson, T.; Facey, H.J.W.; Wahl, D.; Kebede, M.A.; Senior, A.M.; Sullivan, M.A.; et al. Impact of dietary carbohydrate type and protein-carbohydrate interaction on metabolic health. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 810–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Kouba, M.; Kos Durjava, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; et al. Safety and efficacy of RONOZYME®WX CT/L (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) as a feed additive for sows for reproduction. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05790. [Google Scholar]
  139. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Kouba, M.; Kos Durjava, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; et al. Efficacy of RONOZYME®WX (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) as a feed additive for laying hens. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05919. [Google Scholar]
  140. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Rychen, G.; Aquilina, G.; Azimonti, G.; Bampidis, V.; Bastos, M.L.; Bories, G.; Chesson, A.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Flachowsky, G.; et al. Safety and efficacy of RONOZYME®WX (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) as a feed additive for laying hens. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e05020. [Google Scholar]
  141. Woyengo, T.; Bogota, K.J.; Noll, S.L.; Wilson, J. Enhancing nutrient utilization of broiler chickens through supplemental enzymes. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1302–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Seidavi, A.; Tavakoli, M.; Asroosh, F.; Scanes, C.G.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Naiel, M.A.E.; Taha, A.E.; Aleya, L.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Swelum, A.A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of phytonutrients as antibiotic substitutes in poultry feed. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 29, 5006–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Song, X.; Lin, Z.; Yu, C.; Qiu, M.; Peng, H.; Jiang, X.; Du, H.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on growth traits, slaughter performance, serum markers and intestinal bacterial community of Daheng broilers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 106, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Singh, A.; Mishra, B.; Bedford, M.R.; Jha, R. Effects of supplemental xylanase and xylooligosaccharides on production performance and gut health variables of broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Hu, R.; Wu, S.; Li, B.; Tan, J.; Yan, J.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Liu, M.; Fu, C.; Zhang, H.; et al. Dietary ferulic acid and vanillic acid on inflammation, gut barrier function and growth performance in lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglets. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Segura-Wang, M.; Grabner, N.; Koestelbauer, A.; Klose, V.; Ghanbari, M. Genome-Resolved Metagenomics of the Chicken Gut Microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 726923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bohra, V.; Dafale, N.A.; Purohit, H.J. Understanding the alteration in rumen microbiome and CAZymes profile with diet and host through comparative metagenomic approach. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 1385–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Duarte, M.; Kim, S.W. Intestinal microbiota and its interaction to intestinal health in nursery pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Charoensiddhi, S.; Abraham, R.E.; Su, P.; Zhang, W. Seaweed and seaweed-derived metabolites as prebiotics. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2020, 91, 97–156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  150. Costa, M.; Cardoso, C.; Afonso, C.; Bandarra, N.M.; Prates, J.A.M. Current knowledge and future perspectives of the use of seaweeds for livestock production and meat quality: A systematic review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 105, 1075–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Morais, T.; Inacio, A.; Coutinho, T.; Ministro, M.; Cotas, J.; Periera, L.; Bahcevandziev, K. Seaweed Potential in the Animal Feed: A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Min, B.; Parker, D.; Brauer, D.; Waldrip, H.; Lockard, C.; Hales, K.; Akbay, A.; Augyte, S.T. he role of seaweed as a potential dietary supplementation for enteric methane mitigation in ruminants: Challenges and opportunities. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 1371–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Reisinger, A.; Clark, H.; Cowie, A.L.; Emmet-Booth, J.; Gonzalez Fischer, C.; Herrero, M.; Howden, M.; Leahy, S. How necessary and feasible are reductions of methane emissions from livestock to support stringent temperature goals? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2021, 379, 20200452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. FutureFeed. 2021. Available online: https://www.csiro.au/en/research/animals/livestock/futurefeed (accessed on 7 January 2021).
  155. Aachary, A.; Prapulla, S.G. Xylooligosaccharides (XOS) as an emerging prebiotic: Microbial synthesis, utilization, structural characterization, bioactive properties, and applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2011, 10, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Servin, A. Antagonistic activities of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 405–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sarkar, S.; Mazumder, P.M.; Banerjee, S. Oligosaccharide and Flavanoid Mediated Prebiotic Interventions to Treat Gut Dysbiosis Associated Cognitive Decline. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Savignac, H.; Tramullas, M.; Kiely, B.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Bifobacteria modulate cognitive processes in anxious mouse strain. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 287, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Steidler, L.; Robinson, K.; Chamberlain, L.; Schofield, K.M.; Remaut, E.; Le Page, R.W.; Wells, J.M. Mucosal delivery of murine interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6 by recombinant strains of Lactococcus lactis coexpressing antigen and cytokine. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 3183–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Schotte, L.; Steidler, L.; Vandekerckhove, J.; Remaut, E. Secretion of biologically active murine interleukin-10 by Lactococcus lactis. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Steidler, L.; Hans, W.; Schotte, L.; Neirynck, S.; Obermeier, F.; Falk, W.; Fiers, W.; Remaut, E. Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. Science 2000, 289, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sturm, A.; Dignass, A.U. Epithelial restitution and wound healing in inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Farrar, M.; Whitehead, T.R.; Lan, J.; Dilger, P.; Thorpe, R.; Holland, K.T.; Carding, S.R. Engineering of the gut commensal bacterium Bacteroides ovatus to produce and secrete biologically active murine interleukin-2 in response to xylan. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Hamady, Z.; Farrar, M.D.; Whitehead, T.R.; Holland, K.T.; Lodge, J.P.A.; Carding, S.R. Identification and use of the putative Bacteroides ovatus xylanase promoter for the inducible production of recombinant human proteins. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3165–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Hamady, Z.; Scott, N.; Farrar, M.D.; Lodge, J.P.; Holland, K.T.; Whitehead, T.; Carding, S.R. Xylan-regulated delivery of human keratinocyte growth factor-2 to the inflamed colon by the human anaerobic commensal bacterium Bacteroides ovatus. Gut 2010, 59, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hamady, Z.; Scott, N.; Farrar, M.D.; Wadhwa, M.; Dilger, P.; Whitehead, T.R.; Thorpe, R.; Holland, K.T.; Lodge, J.P.; Carding, S.R. Treatment of colitis with a commensal gut bacterium engineered to secrete human TGF-β1 under the control of dietary xylan 1. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2011, 17, 1925–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Hamady, Z. Novel xylan-controlled delivery of therapeutic proteins to inflamed colon by the human anaerobic commensal bacterium. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2013, 95, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 15 01151 g002 550
Figure 2. Side chain components found on xylans are attachment sites for feruloyl groups on α1,3-linked Araf, these are labelled with asterisks; Ac, O-acetyl groups; Me, O-methyl groups. The structures shown depict side chain substitution on a typical arabinoxylan (a), di-substituted L-Arabinose side chains in an arabinoxylan (b), Glucuronoxylan (c), Glucuronoarabinoxylan (d) alternative di-Arabinose substitution on an arabinoxlylan to that depicted in b (e), O-2 and O-3 acetylated xylan backbone (f).
Figure 2. Side chain components found on xylans are attachment sites for feruloyl groups on α1,3-linked Araf, these are labelled with asterisks; Ac, O-acetyl groups; Me, O-methyl groups. The structures shown depict side chain substitution on a typical arabinoxylan (a), di-substituted L-Arabinose side chains in an arabinoxylan (b), Glucuronoxylan (c), Glucuronoarabinoxylan (d) alternative di-Arabinose substitution on an arabinoxlylan to that depicted in b (e), O-2 and O-3 acetylated xylan backbone (f).
Pharmaceuticals 15 01151 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smith, M.M.; Melrose, J. Xylan Prebiotics and the Gut Microbiome Promote Health and Wellbeing: Potential Novel Roles for Pentosan Polysulfate. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091151

AMA Style

Smith MM, Melrose J. Xylan Prebiotics and the Gut Microbiome Promote Health and Wellbeing: Potential Novel Roles for Pentosan Polysulfate. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(9):1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smith, Margaret M., and James Melrose. 2022. "Xylan Prebiotics and the Gut Microbiome Promote Health and Wellbeing: Potential Novel Roles for Pentosan Polysulfate" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 9: 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091151

APA Style

Smith, M. M., & Melrose, J. (2022). Xylan Prebiotics and the Gut Microbiome Promote Health and Wellbeing: Potential Novel Roles for Pentosan Polysulfate. Pharmaceuticals, 15(9), 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop