Next Article in Journal
Formulation and Characterization of Metformin-Loaded Ethosomes for Topical Application to Experimentally Induced Skin Cancer in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Imaging of Aortic Valve Stenosis with Positron Emission Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Photoremovable Linkers as a Novel Strategy to Improve the Pharmacokinetics of Drug Conjugates and Their Potential Application in Antibody–Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nuclear Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in Heart Failure

by
Derk O. Verschure
1,2,*,
Kenichi Nakajima
3 and
Hein J. Verberne
1
1
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Department of Cardiology, Zaans Medical Center, Koningin Julianaplein 58, 1502 DV Zaandam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Functional Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(6), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15060656
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 5 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022

Abstract

:
Cardiac sympathetic upregulation is one of the neurohormonal compensation mechanisms that play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic heart failure (CHF). In the past decades, cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy has been established as a feasible technique to evaluate the global and regional cardiac sympathetic innervation. Although cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging has been studied in many cardiac and neurological diseases, it has extensively been studied in ischemic and non-ischemic CHF. Therefore, this review will focus on the role of 123I-mIBG imaging in CHF. This non-invasive, widely available technique has been established to evaluate the prognosis in CHF. Standardization, especially among various combinations of gamma camera and collimator, is important for identifying appropriate thresholds for adequate risk stratification. Interestingly, in contrast to the linear relationship between 123I-mIBG-derived parameters and overall prognosis, there seems to be a “bell-shape” curve for 123I-mIBG-derived parameters in relation to ventricular arrhythmia or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with ischemic CHF. In addition, there is a potential clinical role for cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in optimizing patient selection for implantation of expensive devices such as ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Based on cardiac 123I-mIBG data risk models and machine learning, models have been developed for appropriate risk assessment in CHF.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a clinical syndrome with a growing incidence and prevalence. In addition to the activated renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and natriuretic peptides, myocardial sympathetic innervation is increased in patients with CHF. Initially, these neurohormonal systems are able to compensate for the impaired myocardial function. However, the long-term activation of these compensation mechanisms has detrimental effects on myocardial structure and function resulting in heart failure (HF) progression.
Cardiac sympathetic innervation has several cardiovascular actions including heart rate acceleration (positive chronotropic effect) and increase in myocardial contractility (positive inotropic effect). Norepinephrine (NE) is the neurotransmitter of myocardial sympathetic innervation and is stored in vesicles in the presynaptic nerve terminals. Via exocytosis, NE is released into the synaptic cleft. Most of the released NE undergoes re-uptake into the presynaptic sympathetic terminal nerve axons via the uptake-1 mechanism. This transport system, the so-called norepinephrine transporter (NET), is responsible for approximately 70–90% of the NE re-uptake from the myocardial sympathetic synaptic cleft. As a consequence, only a small amount of the released NE will be available to stimulate the post-synaptic β-adrenergic receptors (β-AR) of the myocytes (Figure 1).
In CHF, the increased cardiac sympathetic activity is caused by an increased release of NE into the synaptic cleft. In addition, NE re-uptake via the NET is decreased resulting in elevated synaptic levels of NE. These elevated NE levels result in a spillover into the plasma with consequently increased plasma levels of NE concomitant with the severity of left ventricular dysfunction [2,3]. Initially, increased post-synaptic β-AR stimulation by increased NE levels helps to compensate for impaired myocardial function, but long-term NE excess has detrimental effects on myocardial structure and eventually leads to downregulation and decrease in sensitivity of post-synaptic β-AR with downstream effects on second messenger signaling (adenylate cyclase) [4,5]. This down regulation of post-synaptic β-AR causes left ventricular remodeling with further decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and consequently increased morbidity and mortality.
Clinical assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation can be performed by measuring NE plasma levels. Although increased NE plasma levels are associated with mortality in CHF [3], these levels do not specifically reflect the sympathetic activity at the cardiac level. Furthermore, these measurements of NE plasma levels are time consuming and there is a high variability in measurements. Other methods to measure cardiac sympathetic innervation are heart rate variability (HRV) using spectral analysis, muscle sympathetic nerve activity using microneurography and cardiac NE spill over using radiolabeled techniques. However, these techniques have limitations in qualitatively and quantitatively measuring selective cardiac sympathetic activation [6,7].
To date, cardiac sympathetic innervation can easily be visualized by non-invasive nuclear techniques. The most commonly used tracers are 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG) for planar and SPECT imaging and 11C-hydroxyephedrine (HED) for PET imaging. Both tracers are NE analogs resistant to metabolic enzymes and show high affinity for NET allowing the visualization of presynaptic sympathetic nerve function. Other presynaptic PET tracers include 11C-epinephrine, 11C-phenylephrine, and 18F-flubrobenguana [8,9]. Therefore, it is important to know that these PET tracers differ in their affinity to the NET, vesicular storage and metabolism, with consequently differences in their kinetics and specificity (Table 1). For clinical practice, the availability of tracers, is essential. Compared to 11C-HED which is labeled with a short–half-life isotope (20 min), 123I-mIBG can be centrally manufactured and then distributed. To overcome the issue of availability and distribution of PET tracers, an 18F-labeled compound for cardiac sympathetic innervation PET imaging has been developed [10]. Recently, a study demonstrated that the novel PET tracer 18F-Flubrobenguane (FBBG) yield equivalent global and regional distributions in both patients with and without ischemic CHF [11]. In addition, comparative studies between different imaging techniques for the assessment of cardiac sympathetic activity are currently lacking.
So, although the development of a 18F isotope for PET imaging is ongoing, for the near future 123I-mIBG scintigraphy will remain the most widely available planar/SPECT imaging method for assessing global and regional cardiac sympathetic innervation. Therefore, the focus of this review will be on cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging only.

2. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging

Since its introduction, cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy has been established as a highly reproducible and feasible technique to evaluate the global and regional cardiac sympathetic innervation [19,20,21]. Parameters of 123I-mIBG myocardial uptake and 123I-mIBG washout (WO) have been shown to be of clinical value, especially for the assessment of prognosis, in many cardiac and neurological diseases [22,23,24,25,26].

2.1. Patient Preparation

It has been known that some drugs may interfere with 123I-mIBG uptake [27]. However, many cardiac 123I-mIBG studies have conducted in CHF patients on optimal medical therapy (OMT), including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) [28,29]. Despite OMT, cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging is able to estimate the residual risk in these patients. So, there is no need to withdraw such medication prior to cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging. To prevent increase in thyroid activity over time because of uptake of free 123I subjects are pre-treated with 250 mg oral potassium iodide. However, in most subjects, there is still a low-level 123I-mIBG thyroid activity that probably represents specific uptake in the sympathetic nerve terminal in the thyroid [30].

2.2. Planar 123I-mIBG Acquisition and Analysis

Subjects will be injected with 123I-mIBG intravenously (111–370 MBq, depending on local use, regulations and gamma camera sensitivity). Fifteen minutes (early acquisition) and 4 h (late acquisition) after administration of 123I-mIBG, 10 min planar images are acquired with using a gamma camera equipped with a low energy high resolution (LEHR) or medium (ME) collimator. Recommended imaging acquisition conditions for cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging are shown in Table 2 The most widely semi-quantitative parameters in cardiological and neurological applications are the early and late heart-to-mediastinal ratio (H/M) and 123I-mIBG WO. A region-of-interest (ROI) is set as a cardiac contour, ellipsoid or circle over the heart (Figure 2). Standardized background correction is derived from a fixed rectangular mediastinal ROI (7 × 7 pixels) placed on the upper part of the mediastinum [27]. The location of the mediastinal ROI is determined in relation to the lung apex, the lower boundary of the upper part of the mediastinum, and the midline between the lungs. The H/M is determined by dividing the average counts (count/pixel) of the heart by the average count (count/pixel) of the mediastinum [27]. Figure 3 shows several formulas to calculate 123I-mIBG WO. The most commonly used calculation of 123I-mIBG WO is formula A using early and late H/M only. The early H/M offers predominantly information about the integrity of sympathetic nerve terminals (i.e., number of functioning nerve terminals and intact NET), while the late H/M offers information about the neuronal function resulting from uptake, storage and release. The 123I-mIBG WO reflects predominantly neuronal integrity of sympathetic tone/adrenergic drive [31].

2.3. SPECT 123I-mIBG Acquisition and Analysis

Compared with the H/M derived from two-dimensional planar images, three-dimensional imaging using single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) provides a more complete understanding of regional cardiac sympathetic innervation [32]. Although an officially established method for scoring 123I-mIBG SPECT images is lacking, analysis can be performed similar to conventional 17-segment/5-point model used for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) [33]. An example of SPECT 123I-mIBG images is shown in Figure 4. Furthermore, comparison of cardiac SPECT 123I-mIBG images with MPI can also be useful in specific cardiac pathologies such as ischemic heart disease. More recently, the introduction of dedicated cardiac cameras, equipped with solid-state Cadmium–Zinc–Telluride (CZT) detectors characterized by a higher photon sensitivity and spatial resolution compared to standard gamma cameras allow repeated assessment of cardiac innervation with lower radiation exposure [34]. Furthermore, these CZT detectors allow evaluating myocardial innervation and perfusion in a single session, i.e., dual isotope single acquisition imaging.

2.4. Standardization

Essential for large scale implementation of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging is adequate reproducibility, standardization and validation. Therefore, based on scientific data a proposal for standardization of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging has been published by Flotats et al. [27]. Table 1 summarized typical acquisition conditions for both planar and SPECT cardiac imaging. Furthermore, most cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging data is acquired from single center experiences and do not necessarily allow extrapolation to other institutions. One of the most contributing factors of variation of H/M outcome is difference in collimator and gamma camera combination. 123I high-energy photons (i.e.,1.4% 529 keV) causes scatter and collimator septal penetration. This degrades not only the image quality, but has also a significant effect on the H/M and 123I-mIBG WO calculation [35]. Therefore, a phantom-based correction method for different collimator and gamma camera use has been developed by Nakajima et al. [36,37]. This cross-calibration of H/M not only enables a better comparison between institutions, but also unifies H/M among various institutions in multicentre studies, which is important for identifying appropriate thresholds of H/M for differentiating high- and low-risk patients.

2.5. Challenges

Although cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging is feasible in many cardiac diseases, it can be challenging in subjects with severe impaired cardiac sympathetic innervation. Due to (very) low myocardial 123I-mIBG uptake, the anatomic borders of LV are difficult to recognize. In addition, in subjects with severe HF the LV is often dilated. Combined, this may hamper correct placement of the myocardial ROI and may therefore have an impact on the calculated H/M ratio. 123I-mIBG SPECT combined with CT (e.g., low dose CT for attenuation correction purposes only) may overcome these issues.

3. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in CHF

Increased cardiac sympathetic innervation is reflected by a decreased late H/M and increased WO. Both parameters have been shown to be important predictors of events in many cardiac diseases including atrial fibrillation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and chemotherapy induced cardiac toxicity [38,39,40]. However, since its introduction cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging has extensively been studied in ischemic and non-ischemic HF with reduced left ventricular function (HFREF). To date, there is limited information regarding cardiac sympathetic innervation in HF with preserved LVF (HFPEF) [40]. Therefore, the following paragraphs will discuss the role of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in CHF with HFREF only. At the end, we will discuss the role of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in a special type of HF, takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM).

3.1. Alteration of Cardiac Sympathetic Activity by Medical Heart Failure Therapy

In the past decades, the cornerstone of medical heart failure therapy is treatment with β-blockers and ACE-I/ARB. Although this medical therapy has a favorable effect on the LVEF and prognosis, it may also have an impact on cardiac sympathetic activity. β-blockers are thought to reduce the detrimental effects of NE stimulation in CHF [41]. A small randomized, multicenter study by Cohen-Solal et al. evaluated the effect of carvedilol on cardiac sympathetic activity in 64 CHF patients [42]. The authors concluded that benefits of carvedilol on resting hemodynamics appear to be associated with a partial recovery of cardiac sympathetic activity. Furthermore, it has been shown that ACE-I improves neuronal function with increased cardiac 123I-mIBG uptake [43,44]. This may be the result of direct improvement of NE uptake by reducing angiotensin II concentration. It has been reported that angiotensin II prevents re-uptake of NE via the NET [44]. This may lead to increased NE levels in the synaptic cleft and consequently increased stimulation of the post-synaptic β-AR of the myocytes. However, as described previously, long-term NE excess has detrimental effects with down-regulation of post-synaptic β-AR. Furthermore ACE-I is known to improve the hemodynamics. This systemic effect may indirectly result in reduced NE release and normalization of NE uptake by NET. Recently, angiotensin-receptor neprilysine-inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been added to the medical treatment for CHF with impressive effects on both morbidity and mortality [45,46,47]. However, the effect of ARNI and SGLT-2 inhibition on cardiac sympathetic activity in CHF is still unknown and needs further investigation. Although heart failure therapy may alter the prognosis of HF there is still a residual risk of HF progression, ventricular arrhythmia and SCD. In the next paragraphs we will discuss the use of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging to access this residual risk despite optimal medical HF therapy.

3.2. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging as a Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality in CHF

Since the first study of 123I-mIBG assessed cardiac sympathetic innervation in CHF by Merlet et al. [47], a large number of small prospective and retrospective studies have examined the relevance of cardiac sympathetic innervation assessed with cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging as a predictor of cardiac events including HF progression, fatal arrhythmia and cardiac death [31,48,49,50]. CHF patients with increased cardiac sympathetic innervation (i.e., reduced late H/M and increased 123I-mIBG WO) had a worse prognosis compared with those with relatively preserved cardiac sympathetic innervation. These findings were confirmed in the multicentre ADMIRE-HF (ADreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study, that prospectively evaluated the prognostic significance of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in 961 stable CHF patients on OMT with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III and a LVEF ≤ 35% [22]. A predefined late H/M cut-off value of 1.6 using a LEHR collimator was, independent from commonly used markers (i.e., BNP and LVEF), a predictor of the composite endpoint and of each individual component of the composite endpoint: occurrence of HF progression, lethal ventricular tachycardia (VT), or cardiac death. The risk of a cardiac event was significantly higher in patients with a late H/M < 1.6 compared to patients with late H/M > 1.6, with a 2-year event rate of 37% vs. 15% (p < 0.001). The 2-year risk of death was significantly higher in patients with late H/M < 1.6 compared to patients with late H/M > 1.6 with an all-cause mortality rate of 16.1% vs. 3.0% (p < 0.001) and with cardiac mortality rate of 11.2% vs. 1.8% (p = 0.001). In addition, when late H/M treated as a continuous variable, there was a progressive decline in both all-cause and cardiac mortality from 20% for late H/M < 1.1 to none for late H/M ≥ 1.8. Recently the long-term follow-up data of the ADMIRE-HF study with a median follow-up of 62.7 months showed similar results with a significantly higher risk of death in patients with late H/M < 1.6 compared to patients with late H/M > 1.6 with an all-cause mortality rate of 38.4% vs. 20.9% (p < 0.001) and with cardiac mortality rate of 16.8% vs. 4.5% (p < 0.001) [51]. Since the ADMIRE-HF study a late H/M cut-off value of 1.6 became accepted to discriminate low and high-risk patients. However, this cut-off point is based on LEHR collimator use only. For institutions using other collimator types than LEHR, this cut-off value should be corrected using the previous described cross-calibration phantom [36,37]. For example, for intuitions using medium energy general purpose (MEGP) collimator a H/M should be interpreted as 1.96.
A pooled analyses of independent studies using original individual patient and image data, confirmed the results of the ADMIRE-HF study that cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging has long-term prognostic value in CHF [52,53]. Interestingly, a meta-analysis of 6 studies including 636 CHF patients showed that late H/M is not only useful as a dichotomous predictor of prognosis (i.e., high vs. low risk), but also has prognostic implication over the full range of the outcome value for all event categories except ventricular arrhythmias [52]. This finding showed a clear linear relationship between the amount of myocardial dysinnervation and overall prognosis in CHF with HFREF.

3.3. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging as a Predictor for Arrhythmia and ICD Therapy in CHF

Despite medical therapeutic improvements in recent decades, the prognosis of CHF remains inauspicious partly due to fatal arrhythmias and SCD [54]. However, since the introduction of ICDs the overall survival of CHF patients has improved significant [55,56,57]. ICD implantation is indicated in survivors of sustained VT of ventricular fibrillation (VF) (i.e., secondary prevention), but also in selected patients without prior ventricular arrhythmia (i.e., primary prevention) ICD implantation is indicated. Based on large randomized studies, current ESC guidelines recommend ICD implantation for primary prevention in symptomatic stable CHF subjects with NYHA class ≥ 2, LVEF ≤ 35% and under OMT [46].
However, despite the selection criteria for ICD implantation (primary or secondary prevention) it has been reported that 65% of the patients never received appropriate ICD therapy in the first 3 years after implantation [58]. Furthermore, the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial) study showed that 1 year after implantation the annual number of appropriate ICD therapy was only 5.1% rising to 21% 5 years after implantation [57]. Therefore, more precise patient tailored risk-stratification is needed in order to achieve a more (cost)effective management of CHF.
Although the exact pathophysiology of ventricular arrhythmias is multifactorial, it has been recognized that increased myocardial sympathetic innervation is an important factor in the origin of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFREF, especially in ischemic HF [59]. In these patients ventricular arrhythmias develop in myocardial areas with slow conduction in relation to enhanced automaticity, triggered automaticity, and re-entrant mechanisms [60]. In addition, non-uniform denervated myocardium in infarct zone can be hypersensitive to released NE in the synaptic cleft. Especially the border zone of infarct areas with viable myocardium is predisposed to develop re-entrant circuits. This mechanism is most likely triggered by the fact that sympathetic nerve fibres are more susceptible to ischemia than myocytes, thereby causing a disbalance between still viable but partly denervated and normal myocardium [61].
Unlike the clear linear relation between overall prognosis and cardiac sympathetic innervation in CHF with HFREF [52], the exact relation between fatal arrhythmia (i.e., sustained VT or VF) and cardiac sympathetic innervation remains unclear. Some smaller single center studies suggested an association between increased cardiac sympathetic innervation and ventricular arrhythmia or appropriate ICD therapy [62,63,64]. For example, a prospective study by Boogers et al. including 116 CHF patients, eligible for ICD implantation for both primary and secondary prevention of SCD, 123I-mIBG SPECT, as a dichotomous variable, was shown to be an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy (i.e., anti-tachypacing or shock) and cardiac death [63]. A prospectively selected median summed defect score (SDS) cut-off of 26 was used. The cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapy during 3-year follow-up was significantly higher in patients with a relatively large 123I-mIBG SPECT defect (SDS > 26) compared to patients with a small 123I-mIBG SPECT defect (SDS ≤ 26) (52% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). Another small study including 27 CHF patients referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD only, showed that patients with fatal arrhythmia and SCD had lower late H/M (1.54 vs. 1.96, p < 0.001) and higher 123I-mIBG SPECT SDS (37.0 vs. 25.5, p = 0.002) compared to those without fatal arrhythmia and SCD [62]. The PAREPET (Prediction of ARrhythmic Events with Positron Emission Tomography) study showed similar result for PET imaging. In patients with ischemic HF eligible for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of SCD the extent of 11C-HED assesses impaired cardiac sympathetic innervation was a predictor of SCD independently of LVEF, infarct volume, cardiac symptoms, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) plasma levels [65]. Interestingly, a recent study including 94 patients with ischemic HF referred for ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention of SCD showed that 123I-mIBG-derived parameters could not predict appropriate ICD therapy in patients with an ICD for primary prevention of SCD [66]. Although patients with appropriate ICD therapy (i.e., anti-tachypacing or shock) for secondary prevention of SCD had a larger innervation/perfusion mismatch, but no significant difference in early and late H/M. So, except from some small studies, a linear relation between 123I-mIBG scintigraphy findings (i.e., late H/M, 123I-mIBG WO and 123I-mIBG SPECT SDS) and the occurrence of potentially fatal arrhythmia or appropriate ICD therapy is lacking [52]. An explanation could be the heterogeneity of the study population including ICD implantation for primary vs. secondary prevention of SCD and ischemic vs. non-ischemic HF.
Recently, a multicentre study including 135 stable CHF subjects (age 64.5 ± 9.3 years, 79% male, LVEF 25 ± 6%) referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention only, showed a “bell-shape” relation between 123I-mIBG scintigraphy findings (using standardized H/M) and the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy (i.e., anti-tachypacing or shock) [67]. Patients with intermediate late H/M (range 1.40–2.10) were more likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy compared to patients with low and high late H/M (Figure 5A). These findings are in line with previous findings by Agostini et al. [31]. Arrhythmia occurred in CHF patients with an intermediate late H/M between 1.46 and 2.17. Similar results were shown for 123I-mIBG SPECT imaging [68]. In 471 ischemic CHF patients, those with intermediate defects on 123I-mIBG SPECT SDS appeared to be at the highest risk for arrhythmic events (i.e., sustained VT, resuscitated cardiac arrest, appropriate ICD therapy). Therefore, the authors concluded that the presumption of a linear increase in risk of an arrhythmic event with increasing 123I-mIBG SPECT defects may not be correct. More recently, a new wall-level based scoring method was suggested for analyzing innervation/perfusion mismatch in ischemic HF [69]. This visual wall-level based scoring method identified highest risk for fatal arrhythmia (i.e., sustained VT, resuscitated cardiac arrest, appropriate ICD therapy or SCD) in ischemic HF patient with intermediate levels of innervation/perfusion mismatches. The results of the previous studies [31,68,69,70] with a ‘‘bell-shaped’’ curve for 123I-mIBG-derived parameters (i.e., late H/M or 123I-mIBG SPECT SDS) in relation to ventricular arrhythmia or appropriated ICD therapy underline the previous described hypothesis of the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic HF patients. More importantly, these studies suggest that cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging could play a role in patient selection for an expensive device therapy such as ICD implantation.
Finally, cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy-guided selection of candidates for ICD implantation seems to be cost-effective [72]. In a cost-effectiveness model, cardiac 123I-mIBG screening in CHF patients was associated with a reduction in ICD implantation by 21%, resulting in a number needed to screen to prevent 1 ICD implantation of 5. Consequently, compared to no cardiac 123I-mIBG screening costs per patient were reduced by USD5500 and USD13,431 over 2 and 10 years, respectively. Screening with cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging resulted in losses of 0.001 and 0.040 life years over 2 and 10 years, respectively. Although larger studies are necessary to define the exact role of cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in patient selection for ICD implantation, these findings are encouraging in better discriminating those patients who may benefit from those who do not benefit from ICD implantation.

3.4. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging as Predictor of CRT Response

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a disease modifying therapy. In selected CHF patients (left bundle branch block (LBBB), QRS duration ≥ 150 msec, LVEF ≤ 35% and NYHA class ≥ 2) CRT reduces morbidity and mortality as a result of reverse remodeling (i.e., improvement of LVEF) [46,73]. Despite these guidelines recommended selection criteria, only one-third of these CHF patients does not benefit from this invasive and expensive therapy. A recent review, including 9 studies with a total of 225 CHF patients, evaluated CRT and 123I-mIBG assessed cardiac sympathetic innervation [74]. As a uniform definition of response criteria for CRT is lacking, most studies used different criteria for CRT response. However, all available studies showed positive changes in cardiac sympathetic innervation in the responders to CRT. Furthermore, cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging seems to be promising in identifying CHF patients who do not benefit from CRT. This was confirmed by the BETTER-HF study including 121 CHF patients. This study showed that baseline late H/M was an independent predictor of CRT response defined as LV remodelling with 15% reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) (regression coefficient 2.906, [0.293–3.903], p = 0.029) [75]. Furthermore, cardiac sympathetic innervation was improved only in those patients who responded to CRT and these positive changes were correlated with improvement in functional capacity. Although these data are promising, extrapolation to other institutions is hampered by the lack of uniform CRT response criteria and differences in collimator use. To overcome issues of different collimator use, recently a multicentre study evaluated 123I-mIBG assessed cardiac innervation in relation to response to CRT by using standardized H/M [76]. In total 78 stable CHF subjects (LBBB, QRS duration ≥ 150 msec, LVEF ≤ 35% and NYHA class ≥ 2) referred for CRT implantation were enrolled. The results showed that early and late H/M were independent predictors of CRT response (i.e., improvement of LVEF). Therefore, cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging could be used as a tool to select subjects that might benefit from CRT.

4. Risk Stratification Using Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging

To enhance the utility of risk markers for CHF, a large number of multivariate risk models have been developed in the past decades [77,78,79,80]. Although these models often use readily clinical available data (i.e., age, gender, NT-proBNP, NYHA class, LVEF), the use of these risk models in clinical practice remains limited. In Japan, where cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging is already recommended in the national heart failure guidelines [81], a risk model was developed for predicting 5-year cardiac mortality in CHF patients using a pooled database [82]. Parameters used for this model included age, gender, NYHA class and LVEF. Interestingly, by adding late H/M to the model the net reclassification improvement analysis for all subjects was 13.8% (p < 0.0001). This addition was most effective in the downward reclassification of low-risk patients. Furthermore, mortality risk charts for CHF patients have been developed using the following parameters: age, NYHA class, LVEF, and late H/M. These risk charts are based on 2- and 5-year risk models using a pooled database including 1388 CHF patients [83].
Recently, Nakajima et al. have developed a machine learning risk model for predicting 2 years risk of fatal arrhythmia and HF death in CHF patients [71]. In total 13 parameters were used including age, gender, NYHA class, LVEF and late H/M. The probability of HF death is inversely proportional to late H/M with a significantly increase in probability of HF death as late H/M decreased. However, for fatal arrhythmia the probability was maximal when late H/M was intermediate, especially in NYHA class II and III (Figure 5B). This is in line with observations in previously described studies showing a so called ‘‘bell-shaped’’ curve of fatal arrhythmia in relation to 123I-mIBG-derived parameters [67,68,69,70].

5. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM), a special type of HF, is characterized by acute chest pain and is associated with electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, elevated troponins and transient LV dysfunction with apical and mid ventricular dyskinesia in the absence of coronary artery disease which mimics an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [84]. The onset of TCM is commonly triggered by exposure to acute emotional of physical stress. Although the precise pathophysiology of this syndrome has not been completely elucidated, considerable evidence points to epinephrine as an important factor in the pathophysiology. Exposure to high levels of epinephrine may change the intracellular signalling in the myocytes with shifts from positively inotropic G2 coupling to negative inotropic G-inhibitor (Gi) coupling of the β2 adenoreceptors (β2AR) [85]. The mechanism of regional wall motion difference between apex and base is probable due to a greater proportion of β2AR relative to β1AR in the apex compared to the base [86]. Paur et al. showed that this higher β2AR:β1AR ratio in the apex makes this part of the LV more vulnerable to excessive epinephrine stimulation [85]. This could explain the decreased apical and preserved basal wall motion in the acute phase of TCM.
Although TCM is associated with increase epinephrine levels, cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging shows decrease apical 123I-mIBG uptake in the sub-acute phase of TCM (Figure 2) [87]. This is also seen in cardiac 123I-mIBG SPECT imaging (Figure 6) [88]. It has been demonstrated that high levels of epinephrine inhibit the NE uptake by NET [89]. Therefore, the reduced 123I-mIBG uptake (i.e., NE) via NET could be explained as an indirect effect of high epinephrine levels. It seems that the reduced uptake of 123I-mIBG correlates with the impaired LV segments. Recently, Matsuura et al. evaluated the relationship between 123I-mIBG assessed cardiac sympathetic innervation and LVF improvement and the correlation with clinical outcomes in TCM [90]. In total 90 patients with TCM were enrolled and were divided into 2 groups of LVF improvement: <1 month (E) and >1 month (L) The L group was characterized by high catecholamine plasma levels and lower late H/M (2.09 ± 0.45 vs. 2.45 ± 0.44, p = 0.01) with higher 123I-mIBG WO (33.9% ± 13.8% vs. 26.4% ± 10.2%, p = 0.02) compared to the E group. The in-hospital complications were higher in the L group compared to the E group (56% vs. 33%, p = 0.03) including HF (45% vs. 23%, p = 0.03) and in-hospital death (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). The authors concluded that in TCM, increased cardiac sympathetic activity was observed in patients with delayed LVF recovery, which was associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes. Akashi et al. evaluated 8 patients with TCM using both planar and SPECT cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging [91]. After 3 months of follow-up the impaired late H/M was increased compared to baseline (1.89 ± 0.25 vs. 2.13 ± 0.24, p < 0.05). In addition, the 123I-mIBG WO significantly improved compared to baseline (39.1% ± 10.3% vs. 25.4% ± 6.3%, p < 0.05). The authors concluded that this transient regional impaired cardiac sympathetic innervation may causes transient neurogenic myocardial stunning in TCM. Although the late H/M did not completely recover after 3 months, it has been demonstrated by Owa et al. that 1 year after the onset of TCM late H/M completely recovers [92]. Of interest is that despite normalization of LVF and epinephrine plasma levels after a few weeks of onset of TCM, cardiac sympathetic activity takes longer to recover in some patients. The mechanism of this prolonged impaired 123I-mIBG uptake has not been elucidated yet. It has been suggested that the relatively high density and increased sensitivity of apical of β2AR to epinephrine causes a prolonged effect of downregulation of β2AR and impaired re-uptake by NET [93]. This leads to relatively high levels of epinephrine and NE in the synaptic cleft. As a consequence, the high levels cause a slow recovery of apical β2AR and NET compared to the basal located β2AR and NET. In addition, this slow recovery of cardiac sympathetic innervation may identify those patients that are more at risk for a recurrent episode of TCM.

6. Clinical Acceptation of Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging

Despite the numerous studies showing changes of 123I-mIBG assessed cardiac sympathetic activity as a measure of response to pharmaceutical or device therapy [35,37,38,59,67] and the enormous number of outcome studies demonstrating the prognostic significance of 123I-mIBG assessed cardiac sympathetic activity in HF [14,45,86] most cardiologists are not convinced of the additional value and relevance of this non-invasive imaging technique in routine clinical practice. Although the difference between a predicted 2% and 10% annual mortality risk may be statistically significant, if this reflects the already treated underlying, the information of annual mortality risk will unlikely change how the cardiologist treats this patient. Even for the risk for SCD in a CHF subject eligible for an ICD, almost all cardiologists would adhere to the guidelines [46] even if cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging suggested the patient’s true arrhythmic event risk was extremely low [94].
Currently, there are no randomized clinical trials that have evaluated cardiac 123I-mIBG-guided therapy improves outcomes in CHF subject. Without such data, cardiologists have little incentive to order cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy for clinical decision making, Eventual approval of a cardiac PET agent capable of quantifying sympathetic innervation will probably make the challenge of convincing the cardiologist to use cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy for clinical decision making even more daunting. In contrast to locations where 123I-mIBG is relatively inexpensive and can be used as a binary diagnostic test agent, it seems unlikely there will be significant growth in cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in the foreseeable future. However, given the increasing medical costs associated with CHF, a better selection of subjects for expensive device therapy, such as ICD and CRT, is mandatory. The current selection criteria fail to make a proper selection of patients that benefit from these devices [46]. If there is a potential clinical role for cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging in CHF, it will be in guiding the selection of these CHF subjects. Although currently available data show promising result for cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging, none of these studies was designed to demonstrate that 123I-mIBG-guided findings can be used to improve patient outcomes.

7. Conclusions

Cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging is a non-invasively, widely available imaging technique and has been established to evaluate the prognosis in CHF. Standardization, especially among various gamma camera–collimator combinations is important for identifying appropriate thresholds for adequate risk stratification and extrapolation of data to other institutions. Most importantly, in contrast to the linear relationship between 123I-mIBG-derived parameters and the overall prognosis in CHF, there seems a “bell-shape” curve for 123I-mIBG-derived parameters in relation to fatal arrhythmias. These new insights could be helpful, especially in the optimization of patient selection for expensive device implantation such as ICD and CRT.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

D.O. Verschure reports personal fees from SANOFI and a speaker fee from Astra Zeneca and Novartis. H.J. Verberne declares that he has no conflict of interest. K. Nakajima has collaborative research and funds from FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical and Spectrum Dynamics Medical.

Abbreviations

123I-mIBG123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine
ACE-Iangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
ACSacute coronary syndrome
ARBangiotensin receptor blockers
ARNIangiotensin-receptor neprilysine-inhibitor
BNPbrain natriuretic peptide
β-ARβ-adrenergic receptors
CHFchronic heart failure
CZTCadmium–Zinc–Telluride
FBBGFlubrobenguane
ICDimplantable cardioverter defibrillator
HEDhydroxyephedrine
HFPEFheart failure with preserved ejection fraction
HFREFheart failure with reduced ejection fraction
HRVheart rate variability
H/Mheart-to-mediastinum ratio
LBBBleft bundle branch block
LVEFleft ventricular ejection fraction
LVESVleft ventricular end systolic volume
MAOmonoamine oxidase
MPImyocardial perfusion imaging
NEnorepinephrine
NETnorepinephrine transporter
NYHANew York heart association
OMToptimal medical therapy
ROIregion-of-interest
SCDsudden cardiac death
SDSsummed defect score
SGLT2 inhibitorsodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor
SPECTsingle-photon emission tomography
TCMtakotsubo cardiomyopathy
WOwashout

References

  1. Verschure, D.O.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.F.; Somsen, G.A.; Knol, R.J.J.; Verberne, H.J. Cardiac sympathetic activity in chronic heart failure: Cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy to improve patient selection for ICD implantation. Neth. Heart J. 2016, 24, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hasking, G.J.; Esler, M.D.; Jennings, G.L.; Burton, D.; Johns, J.A.; Korner, P.I. Norepinephrine spillover to plasma in patients with congestive heart failure: Evidence of increased overall and cardiorenal sympathetic nervous activity. Circulation 1986, 73, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cohn, J.N.; Levine, T.B.; Olivari, M.T.; Garberg, V.; Lura, D.; Francis, G.S.; Simon, A.B.; Rector, T. Plasma Norepinephrine as a Guide to Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 1984, 311, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Merlet, P.; Delforge, J.; Syrota, A.; Angevin, E.; Mazière, B.; Crouzel, C.; Valette, H.; Loisance, D.; Castaigne, A.; Randé, J.L. Positron emission tomography with 11C CGP-12177 to assess beta-adrenergic receptor concentration in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1993, 87, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bristow, M.R.; Ginsburg, R.; Minobe, W.; Cubicciotti, R.S.; Sageman, W.S.; Lurie, K.; Billingham, M.E.; Harrison, D.C.; Stinson, E.B. Decreased Catecholamine Sensitivity and β-Adrenergic-Receptor Density in Failing Human Hearts. N. Engl. J. Med. 1982, 307, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Esler, M.; Kaye, D.; Lambert, G.; Esler, D.; Jennings, G. Adrenergic Nervous System in Heart Failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 1997, 80 (Suppl. 1), 7L–14L. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lahiri, M.K.; Kannankeril, P.J.; Goldberger, J.J. Assessment of Autonomic Function in Cardiovascular Disease: Physiological Basis and Prognostic Implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 1725–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Werner, R.A.; Rischpler, C.; Onthank, D.; Lapa, C.; Robinson, S.; Samnick, S.; Javadi, M.; Schwaiger, M.; Nekolla, S.G.; Higuchi, T. Retention Kinetics of the 18F-Labeled Sympathetic Nerve PET Tracer LMI1195: Comparison with 11C-Hydroxyephedrine and 123I-MIBG. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Thackeray, J.T.; Bengel, F.M. Assessment of cardiac autonomic neuronal function using PET imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2013, 20, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, M.; Bozek, J.; Lamoy, M.; Guaraldi, M.; Silva, P.; Kagan, M.; Yalamanchili, P.; Onthank, D.; Mistry, M.; Lazewatsky, J.; et al. Evaluation of LMI1195, a novel 18F-labeled cardiac neuronal PET imaging agent, in cells and animal models. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2011, 4, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zelt, J.G.E.; Britt, D.; Mair, B.A.; Rotstein, B.H.; Quigley, S.; Walter, O.; Garrard, L.; Robinson, S.; Mielniczuk, L.M.; deKemp, R.A.; et al. Regional Distribution of Fluorine-18-Flubrobenguane and Carbon-11-Hydroxyephedrine for Cardiac PET Imaging of Sympathetic Innervation. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Higuchi, T.; Yousefi, B.H.; Kaiser, F.; Gärtner, F.; Rischpler, C.; Reder, S.; Yu, M.; Robinson, S.; Schwaiger, M.; Nekolla, S.G. Assessment of the 18F-Labeled PET Tracer LMI1195 for Imaging Norepinephrine Handling in Rat Hearts. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1142–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. DeGrado, T.R.; Hutchins, G.D.; Toorongian, S.A.; Wieland, D.M.; Schwaiger, M. Myocardial kinetics of carbon-11-meta-hydroxyephedrine: Retention mechanisms and effects of norepinephrine. J. Nucl. Med. 1993, 34, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tipre, D.N.; Fox, J.J.; Holt, D.P.; Green, G.; Yu, J.; Pomper, M.; Dannals, R.F.; Bengel, F.M. In Vivo PET Imaging of Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathoneuronal Mechanisms in the Rat. J. Nucl. Med. 2008, 49, 1189–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mack, F.; Bönisch, H. Dissociation constants and lipophilicity of catecholamines and related compounds. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1979, 310, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Raffel, D.M.; Wieland, D.M. Assessment of cardiac sympathetic nerve integrity with positron emission tomography. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2001, 28, 541–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Münch, G.; Nguyen, N.T.B.; Nekolla, S.; Ziegler, S.; Muzik, O.; Chakraborty, P.; Wieland, D.M.; Schwaiger, M. Evaluation of sympathetic nerve terminals with [11C]epinephrine and [11C]hydroxyephedrine and positron emission tomography. Circulation 2000, 101, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zelt, J.G.E.; deKemp, R.A.; Rotstein, B.H.; Nair, G.M.; Narula, J.; Ahmadi, A.; Beanlands, R.S.; Mielniczuk, L.M. Nuclear Imaging of the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System: A Disease-Specific Interpretation in Heart Failure. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1036–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Verschure, D.O.; Bongers, V.; Hagen, P.; Somsen, G.A.; van Eck-Smit, B.F.; Verberne, H. Impact of a predefined mediastinal ROI on inter-observer variability of planar 123I-MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pellegrino, T.; Petretta, M.; De Luca, S.; Paolillo, S.; Boemio, A.; Carotenuto, R.; Petretta, M.P.; di Nuzzo, C.; Perrone-Filardi, P.; Cuocolo, A. Observer reproducibility of results from a low-dose 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine cardiac imaging protocol in patients with heart failure. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2013, 40, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bateman, T.M.; Ananthasubramaniam, K.; Berman, D.S.; Gerson, M.; Gropler, R.; Henzlova, M.; Mendoza, F.; Miyamoto, M.; Shah, M.; Weiland, F. Reliability of the 123I-mIBG heart/mediastinum ratio: Results of a multicenter test–retest reproducibility study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019, 26, 1555–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jacobson, A.F.; Senior, R.; Cerqueira, M.D.; Wong, N.D.; Thomas, G.S.; Lopez, V.A.; Agostini, D.; Weiland, F.; Chandna, H.; Narula, J. Myocardial iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure. Results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2212–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Schäfers, M.; Dutka, D.; Rhodes, C.G.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Hermansen, F.; Schober, O.; Camici, P.G. Myocardial presynaptic and postsynaptic autonomic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 1998, 82, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Shimizu, M.; Sugihara, N.; Kita, Y.; Shimizu, K.; Horita, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Taki, J.; Takeda, R. Long-term course and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Br. Heart J. 1992, 67, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nakajima, K.; Yamada, M. (123)I-Meta-iodobenzylguanidine Sympathetic Imaging: Standardization and Application to Neurological Diseases. Chonnam Med. J. 2016, 52, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. McKeith, I.G.; Boeve, B.F.; Dickson, D.W.; Halliday, G.; Taylor, J.P.; Weintraub, D.; Aarsland, D.; Galvin, J.; Attems, J.; Ballard, C.G.; et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 2017, 89, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Flotats, A.; Carrió, I.; Agostini, D.; Le Guludec, D.; Marcassa, C.; Schaffers, M.; Somsen, G.A.; Unlu, M.; Verberne, H. Proposal for standardization of 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac sympathetic imaging by the EANM Cardiovascular Committee and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 37, 1802–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Agostini, D.; Carrio, I.; Verberne, H.J. How to use myocardial 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in chronic heart failure. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 36, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Carrió, I.; Cowie, M.R.; Yamazaki, J.; Udelson, J.; Camici, P.G. Cardiac sympathetic imaging with mIBG in heart failure. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 3, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Friedman, N.C.; Hassan, A.; Grady, E.; Matsuoka, D.T.; Jacobson, A.F. Efficacy of thyroid blockade on thyroid radioiodine uptake in 123I-mIBG imaging. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Agostini, D.; Verberne, H.J.; Burchert, W.; Knuuti, J.; Povinec, P.; Sambuceti, G.; Unlu, M.; Estorch, M.; Banerjee, G.; Jacobson, A.F. I-123-mIBG myocardial imaging for assessment of risk for a major cardiac event in heart failure patients: Insights from a retrospective European multicenter study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, J.; Garcia, E.V.; Galt, J.R.; Folks, R.D.; Carrio, I. Optimized acquisition and processing protocols for I-123 cardiac SPECT imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2006, 13, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Holly, T.A.; Abbott, B.G.; Al-Mallah, M.; Calnon, D.A.; Cohen, M.C.; DiFilippo, F.P.; Ficaro, E.P.; Freeman, M.R.; Hendel, R.C.; Jain, D.; et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2010, 17, 941–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gimelli, A.; Liga, R.; Giorgetti, A.; Genovesi, D.; Marzullo, P. Assessment of myocardial adrenergic innervation with a solid-state dedicated cardiac cadmium-zinc-telluride camera: First clinical experience. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 15, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Verschure, D.O.; de Wit, T.C.; Bongers, V.; Hagen, P.J.; Sonneck-Koenne, C.; D’Aron, J.; Huber, K.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.; Knoll, P.; Somsen, G.A.; et al. ¹²³I-MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio is influenced by high-energy photon penetration of collimator septa from liver and lung activity. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2015, 36, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nakajima, K.; Okuda, K.; Yoshimura, M.; Matsuo, S.; Wakabayashi, H.; Imanishi, Y.; Kinuya, S. Multicenter cross-calibration of I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine heart-to-mediastinum ratios to overcome camera-collimator variations. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 970–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Verschure, D.O.; Poel, E.; Nakajima, K.; Okuda, K.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.F.; Somsen, G.A.; Verberne, H.J. A European myocardial (123)I-mIBG cross-calibration phantom study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018, 25, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Akutsu, Y.; Kaneko, K.; Kodama, Y.; Li, H.-L.; Suyama, J.; Shinozuka, A.; Gokan, T.; Hamazaki, Y.; Tanno, K.; Kobayashi, Y. Iodine-123 mIBG Imaging for Predicting the Development of Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2011, 4, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hiasa, G.; Hamada, M.; Saeki, H.; Ogimoto, A.; Ohtsuka, T.; Hara, Y.; Shigematsu, Y. Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity can detect congestive heart failure sensitively in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Chest 2004, 126, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dos Santos, M.J.; da Rocha, E.T.; Verberne, H.J.; da Silva, E.T.; Aragon, D.C.; Junior, J.S. Assessment of late anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity by (123)I-mIBG cardiac scintigraphy in patients treated during childhood and adolescence. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2017, 24, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kasama, S.; Toyama, T.; Hatori, T.; Sumino, H.; Kumakura, H.; Takayama, Y.; Ichikawa, S.; Suzuki, T.; Kurabayashi, M. Evaluation of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and left ventricular remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy on the treatment containing carvedilol. Eur. Heart J. 2007, 28, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cohen-Solal, A.; Rouzet, F.; Berdeaux, A.; Le Guludec, D.; Abergel, E.; Syrota, A.; Merlet, P. Effects of carvedilol on myocardial sympathetic innervation in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2005, 46, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar]
  43. Somsen, G.A.; van Vlies, B.; de Milliano, P.A.; Borm, J.J.; van Royen, E.A.; Endert, E.; Lie, K.I. Increased myocardial [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake after enalapril treatment in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart 1996, 76, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kasama, S.; Toyama, T.; Kumakura, H.; Takayama, Y.; Ichikawa, S.; Suzuki, T.; Kurabayashi, M. Effects of perindopril on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with congestive heart failure: Comparison with enalapril. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2005, 32, 964–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Packer, M.; Anker, S.D.; Butler, J.; Filippatos, G.; Pocock, S.J.; Carson, P.; Januzzi, J.; Verma, S.; Tsutsui, H.; Brueckmann, M.; et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1413–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McDonagh, T.A.; Metra, M.; Adamo, M.; Gardner, R.S.; Baumbach, A.; Böhm, M.; Burri, H.; Butler, J.; Čelutkienė, J.; Chioncel, O.; et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 3599–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Merlet, P.; Valette, H.; Dubois-Randé, J.L.; Moyse, D.; Duboc, D.; Dove, P.; Bourguignon, M.H.; Benvenuti, C.; Duval, A.M.; Agostini, D.; et al. Prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging in patients with heart failure. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 1992, 33, 471–477. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nakata, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Doi, A.; Sasao, H.; Wakabayashi, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Tsuchihashi, K.; Shimamoto, K. Cardiac death prediction and impaired cardiac sympathetic innervation assessed by MIBG in patients with failing and nonfailing hearts. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 1998, 5, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cohen-Solal, A.; Esanu, Y.; Logeart, D.; Pessione, F.; Dubois, C.; Dreyfus, G.; Gourgon, R.; Merlet, P. Cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake in patients with moderate chronic heart failure: Relationship with peak oxygen uptake and prognosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1999, 33, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wakabayashi, T.; Nakata, T.; Hashimoto, A.; Yuda, S.; Tsuchihashi, K.; Travin, M.I.; Shimamoto, K. Assessment of underlying etiology and cardiac sympathetic innervation to identify patients at high risk of cardiac death. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 1757–1767. [Google Scholar]
  51. Agostini, D.; Ananthasubramaniam, K.; Chandna, H.; Friberg, L.; Hudnut, A.; Koren, M.; Miyamoto, M.I.; Senior, R.; Shah, M.; Travin, M.I.; et al. Prognostic usefulness of planar (123)I-MIBG scintigraphic images of myocardial sympathetic innervation in congestive heart failure: Follow-Up data from ADMIRE-HF. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 1490–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Verschure, D.O.; Veltman, C.E.; Manrique, A.; Somsen, G.A.; Koutelou, M.; Katsikis, A.; Agostini, D.; Gerson, M.C.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.; Scholte, A.J.; et al. For what endpoint does myocardial 123I-MIBG scintigraphy have the greatest prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure? Results of a pooled individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 15, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Nakata, T.; Nakajima, K.; Yamashina, S.; Yamada, T.; Momose, M.; Kasama, S.; Matsui, T.; Matsuo, S.; Travin, M.I.; Jacobson, A.F. A pooled analysis of multicenter cohort studies of (123)I-mIBG imaging of sympathetic innervation for assessment of long-term prognosis in heart failure. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 772–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Maggioni, A.P.; Dahlström, U.; Filippatos, G.; Chioncel, O.; Crespo Leiro, M.; Drozdz, J.; Fruhwald, F.; Gullestad, L.; Logeart, D.; Fabbri, G.; et al. EURObservational Research Programme: Regional differences and 1-year follow-up results of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot). Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2013, 15, 808–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Moss, A.J.; Zareba, W.; Hall, W.J.; Klein, H.; Wilber, D.J.; Cannom, D.S.; Daubert, J.P.; Higgins, S.L.; Brown, M.W.; Andrews, M.L. Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Connolly, S.J.; Hallstrom, A.P.; Cappato, R.; Schron, E.B.; Kuck, K.H.; Zipes, D.P.; Greene, H.L.; Boczor, S.; Domanski, M.; Follmann, D.; et al. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg. Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur. Heart J. 2000, 21, 2071–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bardy, G.H.; Lee, K.L.; Mark, D.B.; Poole, J.E.; Packer, D.L.; Boineau, R.; Domanski, M.; Troutman, C.; Anderson, J.; Johnson, G.; et al. Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moss, A.J.; Greenberg, H.; Case, R.B.; Zareba, W.; Hall, W.J.; Brown, M.W.; Daubert, J.P.; McNitt, S.; Andrews, M.L.; Elkin, A.D. Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator. Circulation 2004, 110, 3760–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Podrid, P.; Fuchs, T.; Candinas, R. Role of the sympathetic nervous system in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation 1990, 82 (Suppl. 2), I103–I113. [Google Scholar]
  60. de Bakker, J.M.; van Capelle, F.J.; Janse, M.J.; Tasseron, S.; Vermeulen, J.T.; de Jonge, N.; Lahpor, J.R. Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. ‘Zigzag’ course of activation. Circulation 1993, 88, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zipes, D.P. Influence of myocardial ischemia and infarction on autonomic innervation of heart. Circulation 1990, 82, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Marshall, A.; Cheetham, A.; George, R.S.; Mason, M.; Kelion, A.D. Cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging predicts ventricular arrhythmia in heart failure patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention. Heart 2012, 98, 1359–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Boogers, M.J.; Borleffs, C.J.W.; Henneman, M.M.; van Bommel, R.J.; van Ramshorst, J.; Boersma, E.; Dibbets-Schneider, P.; Stokkel, M.P.; van der Wall, E.E.; Schalij, M.J.; et al. Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation Assessed With 123-Iodine Metaiodobenzylguanidine Imaging Predicts Ventricular Arrhythmias in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2769–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Yamamoto, H.; Yamada, T.; Tamaki, S.; Morita, T.; Furukawa, Y.; Iwasaki, Y.; Kawasaki, M.; Kikuchi, A.; Kondo, T.; Ozaki, T.; et al. Prediction of sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure by regional washout rate in cardiac MIBG SPECT imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019, 26, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fallavollita, J.A.; Heavey, B.M.; Luisi, A.J., Jr.; Michalek, S.M.; Baldwa, S.; Mashtare, T.L., Jr.; Hutson, A.D.; Dekemp, R.A.; Haka, M.S.; Sajjad, M.; et al. Regional myocardial sympathetic denervation predicts the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sazonova, S.I.; Atabekov, T.A.; Batalov, R.E.; Mishkina, A.I.; Varlamova, J.V.; Zavadovsky, K.V.; Popov, S.V. Prediction of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2020, 29, 680–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verschure, D.O.; de Groot, J.R.; Mirzaei, S.; Gheysens, O.; Nakajima, K.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.F.; Aernout Somsen, G.; Verberne, H.J. Cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy is associated with freedom of appropriate ICD therapy in stable chronic heart failure patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 248, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Travin, M.I.; Henzlova, M.J.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.F.; Jain, D.; Carrio, I.; Folks, R.D.; Garcia, E.V.; Jacobson, A.F.; Verberne, H.J. Assessment of (123)I-mIBG and (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomographic images for the prediction of arrhythmic events in patients with ischemic heart failure: Intermediate severity innervation defects are associated with higher arrhythmic risk. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2017, 24, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Verschure, D.O.; Poel, E.; Travin, M.I.; Henzlova, M.J.; Jain, D.; Jacobson, A.F.; Verberne, H.J. A simplified wall-based model for regional innervation/perfusion mismatch assessed by cardiac 123I-mIBG and rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT to predict arrhythmic events in ischaemic heart failure. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, jeab132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. De Vincentis, G.; Frantellizzi, V.; Fedele, F.; Farcomeni, A.; Scarparo, P.; Salvi, N.; Fegatelli, D.A.; Mancone, M.; Verschure, D.O.; Verberne, H.J. Role of cardiac (123)I-mIBG imaging in predicting arrhythmic events in stable chronic heart failure patients with an ICD. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018, 6, 1188–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nakajima, K.; Nakata, T.; Doi, T.; Tada, H.; Maruyama, K. Machine learning-based risk model using (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine to differentially predict modes of cardiac death in heart failure. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2022, 29, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. O’Day, K.; Levy, W.C.; Johnson, M.; Jacobson, A.F. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Iodine-123 Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine Imaging for Screening Heart Failure Patients Eligible for an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in the USA. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 2016, 14, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Glikson, M.; Nielsen, J.C.; Kronborg, M.B.; Michowitz, Y.; Auricchio, A.; Barbash, I.M.; Barrabés, J.A.; Boriani, G.; Braunschweig, F.; Brignole, M.; et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 3427–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Scholtens, A.M.; Braat, A.J.; Tuinenburg, A.; Meine, M.; Verberne, H.J. Cardiac sympathetic innervation and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Fail. Rev. 2014, 19, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Moreira, R.I.; Abreu, A.; Portugal, G.; Oliveira, L.; Oliveira, M.; Rodrigues, I.; Cruz, M.C.; Cunha, P.S.; Santos, V.; Clara, H.S.; et al. Prognostic effect and modulation of cardiac sympathetic function in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018, 27, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Verschure, D.O.; Poel, E.; De Vincentis, G.; Frantellizzi, V.; Nakajima, K.; Gheysens, O.; de Groot, J.R.; Verberne, H.J. The relation between cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy and functional response 1 year after CRT implantation. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 22, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Pocock, S.J.; Ariti, C.A.; McMurray, J.J.; Maggioni, A.; Køber, L.; Squire, I.B.; Swedberg, K.; Dobson, J.; Poppe, K.K.; Whalley, G.A.; et al. Predicting survival in heart failure: A risk score based on 39 372 patients from 30 studies. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 1404–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Levy, W.C.; Mozaffarian, D.; Linker, D.T.; Sutradhar, S.C.; Anker, S.D.; Cropp, A.B.; Anand, I.; Maggioni, A.; Burton, P.; Sullivan, M.D.; et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: Prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 2006, 113, 1424–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sartipy, U.; Dahlström, U.; Edner, M.; Lund, L.H. Predicting survival in heart failure: Validation of the MAGGIC heart failure risk score in 51,043 patients from the Swedish heart failure registry. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2014, 16, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. O’Connor, C.M.; Whellan, D.J.; Wojdyla, D.; Leifer, E.; Clare, R.M.; Ellis, S.J.; Fine, L.J.; Fleg, J.L.; Zannad, F.; Keteyian, S.J.; et al. Factors related to morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure with systolic dysfunction: The HF-ACTION predictive risk score model. Circ. Heart Fail. 2012, 5, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Tsutsui, H.; Isobe, M.; Ito, H.; Ito, H.; Okumura, K.; Ono, M.; Kitakaze, M.; Kinugawa, K.; Kihara, Y.; Goto, Y.; et al. JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure—Digest Version. Circ. J. Off. J. Jpn. Circ. Soc. 2019, 83, 2084–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Nakajima, K.; Nakata, T.; Yamada, T.; Yamashina, S.; Momose, M.; Kasama, S.; Matsui, T.; Matsuo, S.; Travin, M.I.; Jacobson, A.F. A prediction model for 5-year cardiac mortality in patients with chronic heart failure using (1)(2)(3)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 41, 1673–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Nakajima, K.; Nakata, T.; Matsuo, S.; Jacobson, A.F. Creation of mortality risk charts using 123I meta-iodobenzylguanidine heart-to-mediastinum ratio in patients with heart failure: 2- and 5-year risk models. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 1138–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Bielecka-Dabrowa, A.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Hannam, S.; Rysz, J.; Michalska, M.; Akashi, Y.J.; Banach, M. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy--the current state of knowledge. Int. J. Cardiol. 2010, 142, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Paur, H.; Wright, P.T.; Sikkel, M.B.; Tranter, M.H.; Mansfield, C.; O’Gara, P.; Stuckey, D.J.; Nikolaev, V.O.; Diakonov, I.; Pannell, L.; et al. High levels of circulating epinephrine trigger apical cardiodepression in a β2-adrenergic receptor/Gi-dependent manner: A new model of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2012, 126, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Lyon, A.R.; Rees, P.S.; Prasad, S.; Poole-Wilson, P.A.; Harding, S.E. Stress (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy--a novel pathophysiological hypothesis to explain catecholamine-induced acute myocardial stunning. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 5, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Verberne, H.J.; van der Heijden, D.J.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.; Somsen, G.A. Persisting myocardial sympathetic dysfunction in takotsubo cardiomyopathy. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2009, 16, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Akashi, Y.J.; Takano, M.; Miyake, F. Scintigraphic imaging in Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy. Herz 2010, 35, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Iversen, L.L. The uptake of catechol amines at high perfusion concentrations in the rat isolated heart: A novel catechol amine uptake process. Br. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 1965, 25, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Matsuura, T.; Ueno, M.; Iwanaga, Y.; Miyazaki, S. Importance of sympathetic nervous system activity during left ventricular functional recovery and its association with in-hospital complications in Takotsubo syndrome. Heart Vessels 2019, 34, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Akashi, Y.J.; Nakazawa, K.; Sakakibara, M.; Miyake, F.; Musha, H.; Sasaka, K. 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy in patients with “takotsubo” cardiomyopathy. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar]
  92. Owa, M.; Aizawa, K.; Urasawa, N.; Ichinose, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Karasawa, K.; Kagoshima, M.; Koyama, J.; Ikeda, S. Emotional stress-induced ‘ampulla cardiomyopathy’: Discrepancy between the metabolic and sympathetic innervation imaging performed during the recovery course. Jpn. Circ. J. 2001, 65, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Verschure, D.O.; Somsen, G.A.; van Eck-Smit, B.L.; Knol, R.J.; Booij, J.; Verberne, H.J. Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy: How to understand possible pathophysiological mechanism and the role of (123)I-MIBG imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Nucl. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Narula, J.; Gerson, M.; Thomas, G.S.; Cerqueira, M.D.; Jacobson, A.F. (1)(2)(3)I-MIBG Imaging for Prediction of Mortality and Potentially Fatal Events in Heart Failure: The ADMIRE-HFX Study. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the sympathetic synapse. Norepinephrine is synthesized within neurons by an enzymatic cascade. Dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) is generated from tyrosine and subsequently converted to dopamine by DOPA decarboxylase. Dopamine is transported into storage vesicles by the energy-requiring vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT). Norepinephrine is synthesized by dopamine β-hydroxylase within these vesicles. Neuronal stimulation leads to norepinephrine release through fusion of vesicles with the neuronal membrane (exocytosis). Apart from neuronal stimulation, release is also regulated by a number of presynaptic receptor systems, including α2–adrenergic receptors, which provide negative feedback for exocytosis. Most norepinephrine undergoes re-uptake into nerve terminals by the presynaptic norepinephrine transporter (NET) and is re-stored in vesicles (following uptake by vesicular amine transporter 2 (VMAT2)) or is metabolized in cytosol dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) by monoamine oxidase (MAO). (Adapted from Verschure et al. [1].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the sympathetic synapse. Norepinephrine is synthesized within neurons by an enzymatic cascade. Dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) is generated from tyrosine and subsequently converted to dopamine by DOPA decarboxylase. Dopamine is transported into storage vesicles by the energy-requiring vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT). Norepinephrine is synthesized by dopamine β-hydroxylase within these vesicles. Neuronal stimulation leads to norepinephrine release through fusion of vesicles with the neuronal membrane (exocytosis). Apart from neuronal stimulation, release is also regulated by a number of presynaptic receptor systems, including α2–adrenergic receptors, which provide negative feedback for exocytosis. Most norepinephrine undergoes re-uptake into nerve terminals by the presynaptic norepinephrine transporter (NET) and is re-stored in vesicles (following uptake by vesicular amine transporter 2 (VMAT2)) or is metabolized in cytosol dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) by monoamine oxidase (MAO). (Adapted from Verschure et al. [1].
Pharmaceuticals 15 00656 g001
Figure 2. Example of placing a circular or elliptical region of interest (ROI) over the heart (H) and fixed rectangular mediastinal ROI placed on the upper part of the mediastinum (M) for calculating heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M). The same ROIs are placed on early and late images to calculate H/M and washout. The H/M outcomes are standardized to the ME-collimator condition.
Figure 2. Example of placing a circular or elliptical region of interest (ROI) over the heart (H) and fixed rectangular mediastinal ROI placed on the upper part of the mediastinum (M) for calculating heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M). The same ROIs are placed on early and late images to calculate H/M and washout. The H/M outcomes are standardized to the ME-collimator condition.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00656 g002
Figure 3. Variations of 123I-mIBG washout (WO) calculation using the myocardial count densities requiring a time decay correction factor (DCF) without (B) or with background correction (C). Calculating the DCF value by the formula of 1/0.5(time/13) for 3.0, 3.5 or 4.0 h, the DCF are 1.17, 1.21 and 1.24, respectively.
Figure 3. Variations of 123I-mIBG washout (WO) calculation using the myocardial count densities requiring a time decay correction factor (DCF) without (B) or with background correction (C). Calculating the DCF value by the formula of 1/0.5(time/13) for 3.0, 3.5 or 4.0 h, the DCF are 1.17, 1.21 and 1.24, respectively.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00656 g003
Figure 4. Examples of late 123I-mIBG CZT SPECT (D-SPECT, Spectrum Dynamics) imaging in a near-normal patient (A) and a patient with after an inferolateral myocardial infarction (B). Conventional short-axis, vertical and horizontal axis slices (left panel), and the corresponding 17-segment model polar map (right panel).
Figure 4. Examples of late 123I-mIBG CZT SPECT (D-SPECT, Spectrum Dynamics) imaging in a near-normal patient (A) and a patient with after an inferolateral myocardial infarction (B). Conventional short-axis, vertical and horizontal axis slices (left panel), and the corresponding 17-segment model polar map (right panel).
Pharmaceuticals 15 00656 g004
Figure 5. 123I-mIBG H/M and breakdown of serious events (A); death from terminal heart failure (HF), progression of HF, sudden cardiac death, and appropriate ICD therapy [67]. The right panel (B) shows machine-learning-based simulation of probability of fatal arrhythmic death. In this simulation a model was created based on patients with documented 2-year outcomes of CHF using 13 variables including age, gender, NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction and planar 123I-mIBG late H/M ratio [71]. The bell-shape appearance of serious arrhythmic events as observed in clinical studies is replicated by simulation models as well.
Figure 5. 123I-mIBG H/M and breakdown of serious events (A); death from terminal heart failure (HF), progression of HF, sudden cardiac death, and appropriate ICD therapy [67]. The right panel (B) shows machine-learning-based simulation of probability of fatal arrhythmic death. In this simulation a model was created based on patients with documented 2-year outcomes of CHF using 13 variables including age, gender, NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction and planar 123I-mIBG late H/M ratio [71]. The bell-shape appearance of serious arrhythmic events as observed in clinical studies is replicated by simulation models as well.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00656 g005
Figure 6. A 60-year-old Japanese woman diagnosed with Takotsubo syndrome. The 123I-mIBG early SPECT show a clear defect in the apical region, and the late image also showed a similar defect (figure not shown). The early and late planar H/M ratio of this patient are shown in Figure 2, showing preserved 123I-mIBG uptake globally despite the severe apical defect.
Figure 6. A 60-year-old Japanese woman diagnosed with Takotsubo syndrome. The 123I-mIBG early SPECT show a clear defect in the apical region, and the late image also showed a similar defect (figure not shown). The early and late planar H/M ratio of this patient are shown in Figure 2, showing preserved 123I-mIBG uptake globally despite the severe apical defect.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00656 g006
Table 1. Comparison of the neuronal handling of radiotracers for imaging cardiac sympathetic innervation.
Table 1. Comparison of the neuronal handling of radiotracers for imaging cardiac sympathetic innervation.
TracerImagingAffinity for NETVesicular StorageVesicular
Leakage
Sensitivity to MAO/COMTNeuronal Membrane LeakageCause of Imaging Defect/Uptake reduction
123I-mIBGPlanar and SPECT++++++Minimal+↓ Nerve density
↓ NET
↑ Sympathetic activity
↑ NE (competitive inhibiton for NET)
11C-EPIPET+++++Minimal+Minimal↓ Nerve density
↓ NET
↑ Sympathetic activity
↑ NE (competitive inhibiton for NET)
↑ MAO activity
↓ VMAT2
↓ Vesicular storage
11C-PHENPET++++++++↓ Nerve density
↓ NET
↑ Sympathetic activity
↑ NE (competitive inhibiton for NET)
↑ MAO activity
↓ VMAT2
↓ Vesicular storage
18F-FlubrobenguanePET++++++Minimal+↓ Nerve density
↓ NET
↑ Sympathetic activity
↑ NE (competitive inhibiton for NET)
Data presented in this table are relative. NET affinity data from [12,13,14],vesicular transport data from [12,13], vesicle leakage data from [15,16], neuronal membrane leakage data from [8,13,14,16,17]. Adapted with permission from Zelt et al. [18]. COMT: catecholamine-O-methyl-transferase; 11C-EPI: epinephrine, F-Flubrobenguane: N-[3-Bromo-4-(3-18F-fluoro-propoxy)-benzyl]-guanidine, 11C-HED: meta-hydroxyephedrine, MAO: monoamine oxidase, 123I-mIBG: meta-idobenzylguanidine, NE: norepinephrine, PET: positron emission tomography, 11C-PHEN: phenylephrine, SPECT: single-photon emission computed tomography, VMAT2: vesicular monamine transporter 2.
Table 2. Recommended cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging acquisition conditions. * standard dose of 123I-mIBG varies among countries; 111 MBq in Japan, 185 MBq in Europe, and 370 MBq in the USA. ** Total acquisition time 20–30 min with anger camera and 10 min with cardiac CZT camera.
Table 2. Recommended cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging acquisition conditions. * standard dose of 123I-mIBG varies among countries; 111 MBq in Japan, 185 MBq in Europe, and 370 MBq in the USA. ** Total acquisition time 20–30 min with anger camera and 10 min with cardiac CZT camera.
Cardiac 123I-mIBG imaging
Administration dosis of 123I-mIBG111–370 MBq *
Timing of acquisition p.i.15–30 min (early)
3–4 h (late)
Planar imaging128 × 128 of 256 × 256 matrix
5–10 min
LE of ME collimators (standarization recommended)
SPECT imaging 64 × 64 matrix
3–6 degree step, 30 s per projection **
180 or 360 degree rotation
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verschure, D.O.; Nakajima, K.; Verberne, H.J. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in Heart Failure. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15060656

AMA Style

Verschure DO, Nakajima K, Verberne HJ. Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in Heart Failure. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(6):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15060656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verschure, Derk O., Kenichi Nakajima, and Hein J. Verberne. 2022. "Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in Heart Failure" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 6: 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15060656

APA Style

Verschure, D. O., Nakajima, K., & Verberne, H. J. (2022). Cardiac 123I-mIBG Imaging in Heart Failure. Pharmaceuticals, 15(6), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15060656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop