Next Article in Journal
A Focus on Abuse/Misuse and Withdrawal Issues with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Analysis of Both the European EMA and the US FAERS Pharmacovigilance Databases
Previous Article in Journal
Functionalized Nitroimidazole Scaffold Construction and Their Pharmaceutical Applications: A 1950–2021 Comprehensive Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Thiazolidines: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Mycosidine Congeners

by
Igor B. Levshin
1,
Alexander Y. Simonov
1,
Sergey N. Lavrenov
1,
Alexey A. Panov
1,*,
Natalia E. Grammatikova
1,
Alexander A. Alexandrov
2,
Eslam S. M. O. Ghazy
2,3,4,
Nikita A. Savin
5,
Peter V. Gorelkin
5,
Alexander S. Erofeev
5 and
Vladimir I. Polshakov
6
1
Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, 11 B. Pirogovskaya Street, 119021 Moscow, Russia
2
Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the RAS, 119071 Moscow, Russia
3
Institute of Biochemical Technology and Nanotechnology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198 Moscow, Russia
4
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31111, Egypt
5
Research Laboratory of Biophysics, National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”, 4 Leninsky Ave., 119049 Moscow, Russia
6
Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 27/1 Lomonosovsky Ave., 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(5), 563; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050563
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 28 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 1 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Compounds with Medicinal Value)

Abstract

:
Novel derivatives of Mycosidine (3,5-substituted thiazolidine-2,4-diones) are synthesized by Knoevenagel condensation and reactions of thiazolidines with chloroformates or halo-acetic acid esters. Furthermore, 5-Arylidene-2,4-thiazolidinediones and their 2-thioxo analogs containing halogen and hydroxy groups or di(benzyloxy) substituents in 5-benzylidene moiety are tested for antifungal activity in vitro. Some of the synthesized compounds exhibit high antifungal activity, both fungistatic and fungicidal, and lead to morphological changes in the Candida yeast cell wall. Based on the use of limited proteomic screening and toxicity analysis in mutants, we show that Mycosidine activity is associated with glucose transport. This suggests that this first-in-class antifungal drug has a novel mechanism of action that deserves further study.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A limited number of chemical classes of compounds can be used against fungal pathogens at this time. In particular, the treatment of topical and systemic fungal diseases in humans and animals uses drugs belonging to the following classes: azoles, polyenes, nucleobase analogues, and echinocandins. Azole drugs inhibit the synthesis of ergosterol, which is a component of lipid membranes, via inactivation of the intracellular enzyme lanosterol demethylase. Polyenes bind to ergosterol on the cell surface, thereby disrupting the membrane structure. Flucytosine inhibits DNA and possibly RNA synthesis. Echinocandins disrupt the structure of the fungal cell wall by inhibiting 1,3-beta-glucan synthase [1,2,3]. Thus, these drugs target only a few molecular targets, which is why the problem of resistant forms of fungal pathogens arises more and more often in recent years. In addition, some of these drugs have significant side effects. Notably, during the past 30 years, only one new antifungal drug—Ibrexafungerp, selectively acting on the cell wall of pathogenic fungi, has entered clinical practice [4].
The search for new antifungal drugs and new targets is an extremely urgent task. One of the promising directions in the search for new antifungal drugs is the detection of chemical compounds acting on the cell wall of the fungus [5,6,7,8,9].
Although the exact structure of the fungal cell wall is not fully understood, it consists of a complex mixture of proteins and polysaccharides, including glucan, mannans, and chitin. Most of the major cell wall components of fungal pathogens are not represented in humans. For these reasons, enzymes that assemble components of the fungal cell wall are excellent targets for antifungal chemotherapies and fungicides [10,11].
At the beginning of the 21st century, the first inhibitors of the mannosyl transferase—derivatives of 2-(4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid—were described (Figure 1, structure I) [12,13].
It was shown [12,13] that transposition of the benzyloxy group to the adjacent 3-position on the central aromatic ring had little effect on the PMT1 inhibitory activity. However, 3,4-bis(benzyloxy) substitution resulted in a significant increase in activity, both against the enzyme and C. albicans cells (IC50: 2.3 and 3.01 µM). Several compounds have been identified which inhibit C. albicans PMT1 with an IC50 in the range 0.2–0.5 µM (R=H, Me) [13].
Thiazolidine and its derivatives, such as thiazolidine-2,4-dione (TZD) (Figure 1, structure II), are important heterocyclic systems with a range of biological activities [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. According to the literature, TZD is one of the most important derivatives, due to a wide range of therapeutic effects and the possibility of modifications producing additional biological activities. These include antiarthritic [28], antimicrobial [29,30,31], antifungal [32], anti-inflammatory [33,34], anticonvulsant, and antioxidant [35] activity, among others. The ability of TZDs to contribute to cancer therapy has been shown in numerous in vitro and in vivo studies [36].
The initial impulse for intensive study of the chemistry and biology of thiazolidines was initiated by the launch of hypoglycemic drugs—glitazones—containing various substituents in the 5-benzyl substituent of the thiazolidine core (Figure 2) [37]. While these TZD derivatives are known to stimulate the PPAR-γ receptor, they also have multiple PPAR-γ independent effects and the specific role of PPAR-γ activation in the anticancer effects of TZDs is still under investigation [38,39].
TZDs have exhibited anti-tumor activity in a wide variety of experimental cancer models via effects on the cell cycle and induction of cell differentiation and apoptosis as well as by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis [40,41]. A study reported by Shah [40] showed that TZD derivative ciglitazone significantly decreased the production of VEGF in human granulosa cells in an in vitro model [42]. Mechanisms of anticancer activity of thiazolidin-4-ones and related heterocycles may be associated with their affinity to anticancer biological targets, such as non-membrane protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP2), JNK-stimulating phosphatase-1 (JSP-1), tumor necrosis factor TNF-α, antiapoptotic biocomplex Bcl-XL-BH3, and integrin αvβ3 [43].
Epalrestat, a derivative of TZD, is also used in medical practice as a non-competitive and reversible aldose reductase inhibitor for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy [44] (Figure 3).
Our group is interested in the antimicrobial activity of thiazolidine-2,4-diones, and in particular, their antifungal effects. A systematic study of a series of various 3- and 5-substituted thiazolidines leads to the creation of a novel topical antifungal drug—Mycosidine (Figure 3) [45,46,47,48].
Mycosidine®, chemically known as (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-3-methoxycarbonyl-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione, was approved by the Russian Ministry of Health in 2008 for the topical treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis caused by dermatophytes (Microsporum canis, Trichophyton gyrseum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum) and yeasts (Candida spp.). This compound belongs to a new class of topical antifungal drugs with an uncharacterized mechanism of action; however, it was shown to cause disruption of the fungal cell wall [49].
Thus, this study aims to create novel, more efficient derivatives of TZD and to characterize the mechanisms responsible for their antifungal effects.

2. Results

2.1. Ethyl 2,4-Dioxothiazolidine-3-Carboxylate and Other Thiazolidine-3-Carboxylates

The interactions of chloroformates with TZD derivatives containing hydroxyl groups in the arylidene fragment have recently been described in the literature [50,51]. The reactions were carried out in dry acetone in the presence of potassium carbonate. With an equimolecular ratio of reagents, the substitution on only the phenolic hydroxyl group is described [50], and with the double equivalent of the chloroformate and potassium carbonate, two reaction centers were involved at once with substitution at the ring nitrogen atom and the hydroxyl group of the arylidene radical [51]. The only N-ethoxycarbonyl derivative, obtained from the potassium salt of 5-nitrofurfurilidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione with ethyl chloroformate in DMF, was described in a French patent [52]. However, other than the melting point, no data confirming the structure of the products was given.
We developed another method for obtaining new similar alkoxycarbonyl derivatives of TZD, on which the synthesis of Mycosidine is based: namely, reacting 5-arylidene TZD in a nonpolar solvent (e.g., toluene) with methyl chloroformate and triethylamine as a base at room temperature [45]. Using this technique from TZD (1) and ethyl chloroformate, ethyl 2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (3) unsubstituted at position five was obtained.
The structure of compound 3 was confirmed using NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. In the 1H NMR spectrum of 3, there is a singlet of the methylene group at position five of the ring in the region of 4.00 ppm and signals of the ethyl group in the region of 4.38 ppm (2H, q, J = 7.16) and 1.34 ppm (3H, t, J = 6.82). In the 13C NMR spectrum (in CDCl3), signals of three carbonyl groups are observed at 147.49 (COOH), 167.55 (C4=O), and 167.65 (C2=O) ppm, the methylene group of the thiazolidine ring at 65.88 ppm, and the signals of the ethyl group of the ester CO-CH2CH3 at δ 33.93 (CH2) ppm and 13.81 (CH3) ppm.
However, it was not possible to carry out the Knoevenagel reaction of 3 with aromatic aldehydes by direct condensation under typical conditions. Under milder conditions (heating in ethanol with piperazine), decomposition products and unreacted compounds were isolated. In acetic acid with the catalysts (methylamine, piperidine), upon heating, the alkoxycarbonyl group was completely removed with the release of TZD as the main product. We managed to obtain the target 5-arylidene-3-carboxylates using an alternative method starting from 5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) with various chloroformates (Scheme 1).
Numerous ways of obtaining 5-arylidene derivatives of TZD using the Knoevenagel reaction are described in the literature. Various conditions are described, e.g., for base catalysts, such as KOH or NaOH: Et3N, AcONa or AcONH4 in AcOH, or toluene at 110 °C with addition of MeNH2; in AcOH, ethanol or toluene with piperidine; and in the presence of AcOH, PEG-400, as well as pyrrolidine and morpholine [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Compound 4a was obtained by the method described by us earlier [53] from compound 1 and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde in the acetic acid medium with 33% aqueous solution of methylamine as a catalyst. Condensation of 4a with various chloroformates under conditions similar to the preparation of 3 proceeded successfully with the production of target crystalline derivatives with good yields (68–85%). Structures were confirmed by 1D and 2D NMR and HRMS.
An example of the structure of 5a as a prototype of a series of compounds 5ae is shown in Figure 4. The values of chemical shifts of 1H and 13C are shown in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
The carbonyl group C(4) signal in the 13C monoresonance spectrum is observed as a doublet with a coupling constant of 6.9 Hz. This information unambiguously confirms the attribution of this signal, because splitting on the proton H(6) can be observed only for C(4) but not for C(2). This measurement also clearly indicates the Z-configuration of the molecule, in which the nuclei C(4) and H(6), separated by three chemical bonds, are in a cis position to each other. For an alternative E-configuration in which these nuclei are in a trans position to each other, the spin-spin interaction constant between them should reach a value of 13–15 Hz. Thus, 5a, like the entire 5ae series, exists exclusively in the form of a Z-conformer.
The description of NMR and mass spectra confirming the structure of the remaining alkoxycarbonyl derivatives 5ae is given in the experimental section. In the IR spectra, there are three intense bands of valence vibrations of the CO group in the region: 1784–1789 (COOR), 1742–1747 (C4=O), and 1690–1700 cm−1 (C2=O). Valence vibrations are CH=C and the aromatic ring is in the region of 1606 and 1586 cm−1.

2.2. 5-Arylidene-3-Benzoylthiazolidine-2,4-Dione Derivatives

Several articles have described 3-Benzoyl derivatives of 5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione as potential herbicidal and antimicrobial agents. Their synthesis was based on 5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione and the corresponding benzoyl chloride and it had a good yield in anhydrous acetone in the presence of K2CO3 with heating [54] or in pyridine at 70 °C [55].
A more detailed study of the benzoylation reaction of TZD unsubstituted at position 5 was carried out by us earlier [56]. It was found that, depending on the synthesis conditions, there is a possibility of the formation of a 3-benzoyl derivative of TZD (6a) and thiazole-2,4-diyldibenzoate (6b) in addition to the main reaction product (Scheme 2).
In this work, we tested the possibility of condensation of 3-benzoyl-TZD (6a) with aromatic aldehydes using the Knoevenagel reaction. The goal in this case was to obtain compounds with an unsubstituted hydroxyl group in the benzylidene fragment, because the acylation of the phenolic group of the arylidene residue may cause formation of unwanted O-acylated byproducts [57]. However, we were not able to obtain 5-arylidene derivatives 7a,b by direct condensation of 6a with aromatic aldehydes under any conditions. Then, a well-known alternative method for obtaining 7a,b by benzoylation of 5-arylidene TZD 4a,b was used (Scheme 3). In addition, some derivatives of 7a,b were obtained that did not contain free hydroxyl groups in the phenyl ring. The reaction was carried out according to a published procedure using acetone with K2CO3 under heating [54].
When analyzing the structure of 3-benzoyl derivatives by NMR (6a, 7a), it was noticed that upon storage in a DMSO-d6 solution, the benzoyl group undergoes decomposition with the formation of benzoic acid. This process occurs for both the unsubstituted TZD 6a (see Supplementary Figure S1) and the 5-arylidene derivative 7a (see Supplementary Figures S2 and S3). With no substituents in position 5 of the thiazolidinedione ring, the 3-benzoyl derivative TZD 6a hydrolyses in a solution of DMSO-d6 with a half-life of 5 h at 25 °C. The half-life of 5-substituted 3-benzoyl-TZD 7a in identical conditions was 11 h. A similar hydrolysis reaction also occurs in other solvents containing water. In the methanol solution, more complex reactions, involving the solvent, can occur (see Supplementary Figure S3).
Stability is a highly important parameter for the active substance of a perspective drug. Thus, due to the instability of 3-benzoyl-substituted derivatives of TZD, we did not continue the study of this series of compounds containing a benzoyl group at the nitrogen atom of the thiazolidine ring.

2.3. 2-(2,4-Dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)Acetic Acid and Its Derivatives

Being derivatives of thiazolidines, 2-(2,4-Dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acids and their thioxo analogs are widely represented in the literature. Most of the works on the synthesis of these compounds are devoted to the search for new hypoglycemic drugs—aldose reductase inhibitors [58,59,60,61,62,63]—or anticancer [64] and antimicrobial drugs [65]. Recently, an article was published showing that several TZD derivatives specifically inhibit the initiation of hyphal growth in C. albicans without affecting cell viability or budded growth [66].
To obtain acetic acid derivatives, we used well-known methods of synthesis, with slight changes and optimizations at some stages. We also prepared dioxothiazolidine derivatives and a new 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone analogue, previously described in the literature, for comparative activity studies. Both dioxothiazolidine and 2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone derivatives were prepared and assayed to fully investigate this series.
Synthesis of the target 2-(2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives 12ae and their 2-thioxo analogs 17a,e is possible via two paths: either through 5-arylidene derivatives of TZD 4ae or through 3-substituted TZD 9 or its 2-thioxo derivative 15. Condensation of commercially available 1, 14, and 15 with aromatic aldehydes was carried out according to a previously developed method in boiling acetic acid with a 33% methylamine as a catalyst (method A) [56]. Some of the 5-arylidene derivatives 4, 10, and 12 were obtained and described before: 4a [53,67,68,69,70,71,72]; 4c [69,70]; 4d [70]; 10a [57]; 12b, 17b [12]). The alkylation reaction for the compounds 4ae and 15b with chloroacetic or bromoacetic acid esters was carried out in a DMF solution in the presence of K2CO3. Then, acidic hydrolysis of the ester group of the thioxo derivative 16 and dioxo derivatives 1011a,b was performed. The action of a mixture of acetic and hydrochloric acids upon heating led to partial hydrolysis of benzyloxy groups and low yield of 12b. Under mild conditions of tert-butyl ester hydrolysis by trifluoroacetic acid in methylene chloride at room temperature, benzyloxy groups are not affected and thereby the yield of 12b increases. According to a published method [12], refluxing 2-(2,4-dioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid with 3,4-di(benzyloxy)benzaldehyde in an acetic acid with sodium acetate gave the product 12b in a very small yield.
When changing the synthesis conditions (Scheme 4) to using tert-butyl esters 11b (obtained by a Knoevenagel reaction with 3,4-dibenzyloxybenzaldehyde) instead of strong acid hydrolysis of ethyl esters, 10b, by refluxing in HCl/AcOH (method C), and after mild acidic hydrolysis by trifluoroacetic acid at room temperature (method D), the yield of (5-(3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (12b) increased dramatically from 5% [12] to 58%.
Condensation of 9 and 3,4-di(benzyloxy)benzaldehyde at different Knoevenagel conditions in ethanol with piperidine as a catalyst (method B), instead of acetic acid, with CH3COONa [12] increased the yield of 12b only to 14% after 28 h of reflux.
Sulfur-containing counterparts 17b,e were obtained in a similar manner (Scheme 5). The compounds containing a hydroxyl group with two chlorine atoms on the phenyl ring (12d,e and 17e) were obtained by Knoevenagel condensation of (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid or commercially available 13 and 14 with corresponding aromatic aldehyde under conditions previously described for other derivatives of TZD: acetic acid as a solvent with 33% methylamine as a catalyst.
In the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 4ae, 1012ae, 16b, and 17b,e, the singlet of the CH=C proton of the benzylidene fragment is observed at 7.8–8.0 ppm. The proton of the imide nitrogen of compounds 4ae is observed in the range from 11 to 12.40 ppm, depending on the arylidene radical. The protons of the methylene group of acetic acid derivatives are observed at 4.52–4.31 ppm.
The 13C spectra of all target compounds of groups 4, 12, and 14 contain signals of carbonyl groups of the thiazolidine ring at two and four positions located at 168 and 167 ppm and carbonyl of acetic acid at 165 ppm. In the spectra of 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-ones 1517, the peak of C2=S is shifted to the weaker field region compared to the carbonyl group in position four and is observed at 195–193 ppm. The signals of C=O of the benzoyl carbonyl group in compounds 7a,b are at 164 ppm.
During the acquisition of the 1H NMR spectra in DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 solutions, a partial decomposition of compounds containing bis-benzyloxy substituents in the phenyl ring was observed, both for 12b and 4b. For the thioxo-containing analog 15b, the hydrolysis process begins in 10–15 min after dissolution in CDCl3 (see Supplementary Material: the process of partial decomposition of 15b in CDCl3).

2.4. Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Synthesized Compounds

In vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of all target compounds was determined using the method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the serial dilution method in 96-well plates [73,74]. All of the target compounds were evaluated for their antifungal activity against five important fungal pathogens. Fluconazole (FLC) was used as a reference drug. The in vitro antifungal activity results are summarized in Table 3.
As shown in Table 3, the substitution of the nitrogen atom of the thiazolidine ring with an alkoxycarbonyl or benzoyl radical led to a significant increase in antifungal activity compared to unsubstituted derivatives of TZD 4ae, with respect to all types of yeast and filamentous fungi. The substitution of alkyl groups of alkoxycarbonyl derivatives with phenyl (5d) or benzyl (5e) radicals negatively affected antimicrobial activity. A similar result was observed with substituted acetic acid esters 1011a,b.
Dibenzyloxy derivatives of TZD 4b and its thioxo analog 15b did not show high antifungal activity. Furthermore, the 2,4-dichloro derivative 12c exhibited high activity against A. fumigatus ATCC 46645 (2 mg/L) and moderate activity against other types of filamentous fungi (16–32 mg/L).
Other acetic acid derivatives 12de containing chloro and hydroxy groups in the benzylidene radical showed moderate antifungal activity against filamentous fungi (MIC = 16 µg/mL) and the 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one derivative 17e showed higher activity (MIC = 2–8 mg/L) against M. canis B-200 and T. rubrum 2002 than the oxy analogue 12e (MIC = 16 mg/L).
The bis-benzyloxy derivative of TZD 12b and its thioxo analog 17b did not show good MIC values, despite the high inhibitory activity of 17b toward mannosyltransferase reported in some articles [12,13]. This fact indicates that the effect of thiazolidine derivatives on the fungal cell wall may not be associated with the inhibition of PMT1; it also extends to other targets that have yet to be clarified. When the 2-hydroxy group was combined with 3,5-dichloro substituents, the antifungal activity became more pronounced on C. albicans yeasts, so an additional experiment on clinical isolates of Candida spp. was conducted.
On clinical strains of Candida spp. in comparison with Fluconazole and Mycosidine, 3-substituted TZD derivatives 5a and 7a showed moderate activity similar to Mycosidine with MIC ranging from 8 to 64 mg/L (Table 4). High activity of 2-hydroxy-3,5-dichloro derivative 12e was demonstrated on yeasts C. albicans ATCC 24433 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (MIC 0.125–0.5 mg/L), whereas activity on other Candida spp. was much lower.

2.5. Cellular Response to Mycosidine

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the effects of TZD derivatives on fungal cells, we assayed the response of a model fungal organism—Saccharomyces cerevisiae—to Mycosidine, which was available in the highest quantities. To do this, we initially determined the MIC (15.6 mg/L) and assayed the number of cells with permeabilized membranes using propidium iodide (PI). Notably, at MIC and below it, the population of dead cells was ~20% after 6 h of treatment, which suggests that the breakdown of the cell wall is not the primary mechanism that stops cell division. We also tested whether Mycosidine had a fungicidal effect on the cells by semi-quantitatively assaying the number of CFU using a spotting assay. This test showed that Mycosidine had a noticeable fungicidal effect, but only after 24 h, with no massive cell death observed after 2, 4, or 6 h of incubation, i.e., cell death in response to the drug is rather slow (Figure 5A).
Then, we tested whether cells treated with this drug at sublethal concentrations experience some specific changes of protein levels. This was done by monitoring the levels of a select number of proteins tagged with GFP using flow cytometry. The proteins we tested were mainly selected from those considered as “sentinel-proteins” [75] as well as several additional proteins (65 proteins and autofluorescence control—see Supplementary Material). We used different concentrations of the drug—MIC and 0.5×MIC for screening all of the proteins—and then at 0.5–4×MIC for the confirmation tests. Notably, all of the experiments were performed with simultaneous staining for cells with membranes, and the presented data are for living cells only.
Our results show that Mycosidine caused specific increases in the levels of at least two proteins—Pdr5 and Hxt3 (Figure 5B)—when compared to multiple other drugs that were tested in a similar manner (manuscript in preparation). Notably, this increase was only observed at 0.5×MIC and disappeared at higher concentrations. Pdr5 is an ABC-transporter, involved in the efflux of multiple compounds, including antifungal drugs such as azoles. Hxt3 is a low-affinity glucose transporter, which has not, to our knowledge, been previously implicated in responses to antifungal drugs.
Having identified that these proteins are induced by drug treatment, we tested whether these proteins played a role in the sensitivity of cells to this drug by using strains containing deletions of the corresponding genes [76]. Deletion of Pdr5 had no effect (Figure 5C), which shows that Mycosidine might not be a substrate of the Pdr5 transporter and that its induction might be a non-specific response of the cell to stress caused by the drug. A similar effect was recently shown for the protonophore pentachlorophenol [77].
Interestingly, the deletion of Hxt3 increased the sensitivity of the yeast to the drug (Figure 5C), which suggests that the response of glucose transporters may be necessary for adaptation to the drug. Because yeast has numerous glucose transporters, it might be that one or several of them are targets for Mycosidine or that glucose transport is a resistance mechanism; this requires further study.
Lastly, monitoring of the amount of the GFP-tagged histone Htb2 allows us to monitor the dynamics of the cell cycle of drug treated cells (Figure 5D). This analysis shows that Mycosidine at 0.5×MIC reduces the share of cells with a 2C complement of DNA (because Htb2 levels and DNA levels are usually well correlated) and increases the height of the area between the 1C and 2C peaks, suggesting that progression of the S-phase of the cell cycle is impaired. The MIC concentration of Mycosidine causes most cells to exhibit a 1C distribution, while also causing emergence of an additional population of cells with lower fluorescence, which might suggest apoptotic cell death. This suggests impaired cell cycle progression prior to the initiation of replication as well as, possibly, apoptosis-like cell death.

2.6. Effects on the Cell Wall

SICM is a non-contact type of scanning probe microscopy applicable for the investigation of live biological samples in liquid [78,79,80,81]. This method was used to study the influence of antifungal thiazolidines on the topography of living Candida cells. It is reasonable to use effective concentrations to see any changes in topography induced by the drugs in question and for this reason concentration equal to MIC and 10×MIC for both Mycosidine and 17b were chosen. The MIC for Mycosidine is two times lower than the same one for 17b, but 17b was still used as it is reported to be a highly active inhibitor of mannosyltransferase. Spikes that were 100–200 nm in diameter were observed after treatment of the Candida cells with Mycosidine and 17b compounds. The appearance of such spikes on the Candida cell surface is most probably related to the disruption of the cell wall. Only cells attached to the substrate can be investigated with SCIM and probably for this reason we can easily find some resistant cells without any spikes. The obtained results clearly demonstrate that the action of both Mycosidine and 17b causes disruption of the cell wall but Mycosidine achieves the same effect with much lower concentration (Figure 6).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

3.1.1. Materials and General Methods

All the reagents were obtained commercially and used without further purification. Thiazolidine-2,4-dione 1 and (4-oxo-2-thioxo-3-thiazolidinyl)acetic acid 3 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Purity of the compounds was checked by thin layer chromatography using silica-gel 60 F254-coated Al plates (Merck) and spots were observed under UV light. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance spectrometer (600 and 150 MHz, respectively) and Varian VXR-400 spectrometer at 400 MHz and 101 MHz, respectively, at 298 K in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 at a concentration of samples of 5–15 mmol, with TMS as internal reference for 1H and 13C NMR spectra. The signal assignments of compound 11, 12, 15, and 17 were performed using 2D spectra (DQF-COSY, 13C–1H HSQC, and 13C–1H HMBC); the chemical shifts are expressed in ppm (δ scale) using DMSO and CDCl3 as an internal standard, and the coupling constants are expressed in Hz. The mass-spectral measurements were carried out by ESI method on micrOTOF-QII (Brucker Daltonics GmbH). Analytical HPLC was performed on a Shimadzu LC-20AD system using Kromasil-100-5-C18 (Akzo-Nobel) column, 4.6 × 250 mm, temperature 20 °C, UV detection, mobile phase A—0.2% HCOONH4), mobile phase B-MeCN, (pH 7.4), and fl-1ml/min.

3.1.2. Synthesis of the Starting Materials

The synthetic routes used to synthesize starting materials are outlined in Scheme 1, Scheme 2 and Scheme 3. The detailed description of the method and physico-chemical properties of 6a, 8, and 9 were described elsewhere [56,60].
Ethyl 2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (3). To a solution of thiazolidine-2,4-dione, (1) (11.7 g, 0.1 mol) and Et3N (28.0 mL, 0.2 mol) in dry toluene (100 mL), ethyl chloroformate (10.5 mL, 0.11 mol) was added in small portions, keeping the temperature at 3–5 °C. After stirring at room temperature for 3 h, water (250 mL) was added; then, the mixture was filtrated, the filtrate was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL), the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous part was re-extracted with EtOAc (100 mL). Organic extracts were combined, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (100 g of silica gel) using CHCl3-hexane mixtures (10:1 to 1:0) as an eluent. The product was dried in vacuo at room temperature to give 3 (18.1 g, 96%) as colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.38 (2H, q, J = 7.16), 4.00 (2H, s), 1.34 (3H, t, J = 6.82). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.65, 167.55, 147.49, 65.88, 33.93, 13.81. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C6H7NO4S [M + H]+ 190.0169. Found: m/z 190.0135.
(Z)-5-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) [53,67,68,69,70,71,72]. A solution of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (147.5 g. 1.05 mol), 2,4-thiazolidinedione (1) (117.2 g, 1.0 mol), 33% aqueous solution of methylamine (0.2 mL, 1.6 mmol) in acetic acid (500 mL) was refluxed for 6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was diluted with water (100 mL), and the resulted precipitate was filtered off, washed with cold water (100 mL), and dried under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in CHCl3 (200 mL), filtered, and then i-PrOH (200 mL) was added, the resulting suspension filtered, washed with cold i-PrOH (50 mL), and dried in vacuo to give 4a (179.7 g, 75%) as colorless crystals. Filtrates were combined and evaporated in vacuo and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (100 g of silica gel) using CHCl3-hexane mixtures (10:1 to 1:0) as an eluent, to give 4a (50.3 g, 21%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.63 (1H, s, NH), 7.71 (1H, s, CH=C), 7.53 (4H, t, J = 9.62,Ar), 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.99, 167.59, 135.42, 132.30, 132.00(2C), 130.82, 129.74(2C), 124.66. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C10H5NO4S [M + H]+ 238.0169. Found: m/z 238.0135.
(Z)-5-(3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4b). The same procedure as described for 4a was carried out using 3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzaldehyde (31.8 g, 0.1 mol) and 2,4-thiazolidinedione (1) (11.1 g, 0.095 mol) to give 4b (37.8 g, 91%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.20 (1H, s), 7.68 (1H, s), 7.43 (4H, t, J = 7.9), 7.36 (4H, t, J = 7.5), 7.30 (2H, t, J = 7.4), 7.03 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.1), 6.99 (1H d, J = 2.1), 6.96 (1H, d, J = 8.4), 5.21 (2H, s), 5.19 (2H, s). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.39, 166.89, 151.19, 148.77, 136.38, 136.24, 134.31, 128.63, 128.61, 128.10, 128.08, 127.23, 127.18, 126.06, 125.32, 119.64, 115.76, 114.08, 71.20, 70.88. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C24H19NO4S [M + H]+ 418.1035. Found: m/z 418.1085.
(Z)-5-(2,4-Dichlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4c) [69,70]. The same procedure as described for 4a was carried out using 2,4-dichlorobenzaldehyde (7.8 g, 50 mmol) and 2,4-thiazolidinedione 1 (5.2 g, 45 mmol) to give 4c (1.6 g, 85%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.73 (1H, s, NH), 7.81 (1H, s, C=CH), 7.76 (1H, s, Ar), 7.55–7,52 (2H, m, Ar). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-6)δ: 167.72 (C2=O), 167.97 (C4=O), 135.88, 135.79, 130.52, 130.40, 128.72, 128.34, 125.97. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C10H4Cl2NO2S [M + H]+ 274.1233. Found: m/z 274.1199.
(Z)-5-(2-Hydroxy-5-chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4d) [70]. The same procedure as described for 4a was carried out using 2-hydroxy-5-chlorobenzaldehyde (8.8 g, 50 mmol) and 2,4-thiazolidinedione 1 (5.2 g, 45 mmol) to give 4d (10.7 g, 84%) as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.40 (1H, s, NH), 10.78 (1H, s, OH), 7.68 (1H, s, C=CH), 7.29 (1H, dd, J = 8.50, 1.97, Ar), 7.21 (1H, d, J = 1.83, Ar), 6.94 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.1, Ar). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 168.17, 167.81, 156.40, 131.91, 127.74, 125.95, 124.22, 123.49, 122.06, 118.20. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C10H6ClNO3S [M + H]+ 255.9830. Found: m/z 255.9867.
(Z)-5-(2-Hydroxy-3,5-dichlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4e). The same procedure as described for 4a was carried out using 2-hydroxy-3,5-dichlorobenzaldehyde (9.5 g, 50 mmol) and 2,4-thiazolidinedione (1) (5.2 g, 45 mmol) to give 4e (12.3 g, 87%) as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 12.50 (1H, s. NH), 10.73 (1H, s, OH), 7.86 (1H, s, C=CH), 7.57 (1H, d, J = 2.24, Ar), 7.18 (1H, d, J = 2.1, Ar). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.49, 167.06, 151.37, 130.69, 126.23, 125.88, 125.34, 124.52, 123.86, 123.18. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C10H5Cl2NO3S [M + H]+ 289.9440. Found: m/z 289.9457.
Ethyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5a) [45]. To a solution of (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) and Et3N (28.0 mL, 0.2 mol) in dry toluene (200 mL), ethyl chloroformate (10.5 mL, 0.11 mol) was added in small portions, keeping the temperature at 3–5 °C. After stirring at room temperature for 3 h, water (250 mL) was added; then, the mixture was filtrated, the filtrate diluted with EtOAc (100 mL), the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous part was re-extracted with EtOAc (100 mL). Organic extracts were combined, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (100 g of silica gel) using CHCl3-hexane mixtures (10:1 to 1:0) as an eluent, to give 5a (3.4g, 11%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.43 (3H, t, J = 7.70), 4.50 (2H, q, J = 7.15), 7.43 (4H, q, J = 6.89), 7.85 (1H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz CDCl3): δ 13.9, 66.0, 120.4, 129.6, 131.2, 131.4, 134.0, 137.2, 147.3, 162.4, 163.3. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C13H10ClNO4S [M + H]+ 312.0092. Found: m/z 312.0104.

3.1.3. Synthesis of the Target Compounds

Isobutyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5b). The same procedure as described for 5a was carried out using (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) and isobutyl chloroformate (14.2 mL, 0.11 mol) to give 5b (29.2 g, 86%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 1.02 (6H, d, J = 6.72), 2.04–2.14 (1H, m), 4.22 (2H, d, J = 6.38), 7.43 (4H, q, J = 7.15), 7.87 (1H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 18.76 (2C), 27.66, 75.60, 120.41, 129.66(2C), 131.27, 131.43(2C), 133.93, 137.18, 147.47, 162.44, 163.32. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C15H14ClNO4S [M + H]+ 340.0405. Found: m/z 340.0376.
Allyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5c). The same procedure as described for 5a was carried out using (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) and allyl chloroformate (11.6 mL, 0.11 mol) to give 5c (27.1 g, 84%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.91 (2H, d, J = 5.57), 5.37 (1H, d, J = 10.52), 5.15 (1H, d, J = 17.29), 5.94–6.04 (1H, m), 7.43 (1H, q, J = 7.06), 7.85 (1H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 65.07. 115.48, 115.79, 124.92(2C), 125.06, 126.47, 126.71(2C), 129.33, 132.48, 142.42, 157.56, 158.51. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C14H10ClNO4S [M + H]+ 324.0092. Found: m/z 324.0062.
Phenyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5d). The same procedure as described for 5a was carried out using (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene) thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) and phenyl chloroformate (13.8 mL, 0.11 mol) to give 5d (28.1 g, 78%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31–7.35 (3H, m), 7.43–7.50 (6H, m), 7.94 (1H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 120.05. 120.85(2C), 127.15, 129.73(2C), 129.77(2C), 131.17, 131.51(2C), 134.48, 137.40, 145.94, 150.18, 162.18, 163.17. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C17H10ClNO4S [M + H]+ 360.0092. Found: m/z 360.0105.
Benzyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5e). The same procedure as described for 5a was carried out using of (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene) thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) and benzyl chloroformate (15.7 mL, 0.11 mol) to give 5e (26.8 g, 72%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.90 (2H, s), 7.29–7.35 (3H, m), 7.39–7.45 (6H, m), 7.83 (1H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 45.36, 122.08, 128.32, 128.76(2C), 128.89(2C), 129.54(2C), 131.28(2C), 131.65, 132.47, 135.02, 136.64, 165.92, 167.28. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C18H12ClNO4S [M + H]+ 374.0248. Found: m/z 374.0288.
5-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)-3-benzoythiazolidine-2,4-dione (7a). 5-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione potassium salt72 (27.7 g, 0.1 mol) was suspended in dry acetone (200 mL) and benzoyl chloride (12.7 mL, 0.11 mol) was added at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 2 h and cooled to room temperature and filtered; then, acetone was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was diluted with water and CHCl3 (200 + 200 mL). Then, the organic layer was separated, dried by Na2SO4, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was recrystallized from absolute EtOH to give 7a (29.5 g, 86%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (2H, d, J = 7.8), 7.87 (1H, s), 7.69 (1H, t, J = 7.5), 7.52 (2H, t, J = 7.8), 7.49–7.42 (4H, m). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.12, 164.96, 164.33, 137.22, 135.60, 133.94, 131.44, 131.27, 130.78, 130.74, 129.68, 129.16, 121.20. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C17H10ClNO3S [M + H]+ 344.0143. Found: m/z 344.0188.
(3,4-Dibenzyloxibenzylidene)-3-benzoythiazolidine-2,4-dione (7b). The same procedure as described for 7a was carried out using (Z)-5-(3,4-dibenzyloxibenzylidene) thiazolidine-2,4-dione 4b (41.7 g, 0.1 mol) and benzoyl chloride (12.7 mL, 0.11 mol). to give 7b (40.6 g, 78%) as colourless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.90 (2H, d, J = 7.7), 7.78 (1H, s), 7.67 (1H, t, J = 7.4), 7.50 (2H, t, J = 7.7), 7.47–7.29 (10H, m), 7.07 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.1), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 2.1), 7.00 (1H, d, J = 8.3), 5.24 (2H, s), 5.22 (2H, s). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.46, 165.53, 164.59, 151.54, 148.87, 136.41, 136.24, 135.47, 135.43, 130.93, 130.76, 129.09, 128.67, 128.65, 128.12, 128.10, 127.13, 127.12, 125.95, 125.61, 117.75, 115.96, 114.16, 71.27, 70.89. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C31H23ClNO5S [M + H]+ 522.370. Found: m/z 522.1402.
Ethyl 2-(2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (8) [60]. To a solution of 2,4-thiazolidinedione (1 g, 8.5 mmol) and ethyl bromoacetate (3.2 g, 17 mmol) in THF (25 mL) was added potassium carbonate (2.35 g, 17 mmol). The suspension was refluxed for 5 h; then, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was washed with methanol to provide (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid ethyl ester (1.62 g, 93%) as white oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 4.32 (2H, s), 4.20 (2H, s), 4.29 (2H, s), 4.15–4.10 (2H, q, J = 7.1), 1.18 (3H, t, J = 7.1). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.20, 171.77, 167.14, 61.93, 42.16, 42.34, 34.43, 14.36. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C7H9NO4S [M + H]+ 204.0325. Found: m/z 204.0355.
2-(2,4-Dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (9) [60]. A solution of 8 (1.0 g, 5 mmol) in glacial acetic acid (25 mL) with addition of 2 mL 2N HCl was refluxed for 2 h. After evaporation to dryness in vacuo, the crude oil was washed with water and ethanol to provide pure (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (0.82 g, 94%) as a white oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.30 (1H, s), 4.32 (2H, s), 4.20 (2H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.90, 171.48, 168.11, 42.06, 34.04.
(Z)-tert-Butyl-2-(5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (10a). The same procedure as described for 8 was carried out using (Z)-5-(4-Chlorobenzylidene) thiazolidine-2,4-dione 4a (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) and tert-butyl bromoacetate (17.8 mL, 0.11 mol) to give 10a (41.4 g, 78%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (1H, s), 7.43 (4H, t, J = 7.7), 7.36 (5H, t, J = 7.8), 7.30 (2H, dt, J = 7.8, 1.8), 7.00–6.95 (2H, m), 5.20 (4H, d, J = 7.1), 4.34 (2H, s), 1.45 (9H, s).13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.04, 165.98, 165.29, 135.97, 133.16, 132.32(2C), 132.07, 129.92(2C), 121.70, 82.98, 43.35, 27.98(3C). HRMS (EI): Calcd for C16H16ClNO4S [M + H]+ 354.0561. Found: m/z 354.0578.
(Z)-tert-Butyl-2-(5-(3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (10b). The same procedure as described for 8 was carried out. (Z)-5-(3,4-dibenzyloxibenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4b) (41.7 g, 0.1 mol) and tert-butyl bromoacetate (17.8 mL, 0.11 mol) were used to give 10b (41.4 g, 78%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.76 (1H, s), 7.43 (4H, t, J = 7.7), 7.36 (5H, t, J = 7.8), 7.30 (2H, dt, J = 7.8, 1.8), 7.00–6.95 (2H, m), 5.20 (4H, d, J = 7.1), 4.34 (2H, s), 1.45 (9H, s). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.55, 165.69, 165.22, 136.47, 136.45, 134.34, 128.63(2C), 128.60(2C), 128.04(2C), 127.13(3C), 127.09(2C), 126.25, 125.25, 118.46, 115.83, 114.15, 83.13, 71.20, 70.85, 42.77, 27.94(3C). HRMS (EI): Calcd for C30H29NO6S [M + H]+ 532.1788. Found: m/z 532.1774.
Ethyl (Z)-2-(5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (11a) [57]. To a solution of (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4a) (23.9 g, 0.1 mol) in THF (250 mL), ethyl bromoacetate (12.1 mL, 0.11 mol) and K2CO3 (27.5 g, 0.2 mol) were added. The mixture was refluxed for 5 h, and then cooled to room temperature, filtrated, and the filtrate evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CHCl3/water (100 + 100 mL), the organic layer was separated, it was dried by Na2SO4, and it was evaporated in vacuo. The product was recrystallized from dry EtOH to give 11a (25.3 g, 78%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.90 (1H, s), 7.46 (2H, d, J = 8.4), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.4), 4.68 (2H, s), 4.22 (2H, q, J = 7.1), 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.1). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.67, 164.34, 163.23, 137.60, 134.95, 131.55, 129.77, 119.39, 113.90, 44.82 42.07, 14.08. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C14H12ClNO4S [M + H]+ 326.0248. Found: m/z 326.0259.
Ethyl-2-(5-(3,4-bisbenzyloxybenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (11b). The procedure for 8 was carried out using (Z)-5-(3,4-dibenzyloxibenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (4b) (41.7 g, 0.1 mol) and ethyl bromoacetate (12.1 mL, 0.11 mol) to give 11b (34.7 g, 69%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (1H, s), 7.46–7.29 (10H, m), 7.05 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.1), 7.02 (1H, d, J = 2.1), 6.97 (1H, d, J = 8.4), 5.22 (2H, s), 5.21 (2H, s), 4.43 (2H, s), 4.22 (2H, q, J = 7.1), 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.1). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.55, 166.27, 165.63, 151.25, 148.84, 136.47, 136.35, 134.61, 128.66, 128.09, 127.16, 127.12, 126.23, 125.35, 118.36, 115.88, 114.20, 71.26, 70.91, 62.10, 42.07, 14.08. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C28H25NO6S [M + H]+ 504.1475. Found: m/z 504.1501.
(Z)-2-(5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (12a) [82].
Method 1. (From 10a) A solution of ethyl (Z)-2-(5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (10a) (16.2 g, 50 mmol) in AcOH (150 mL) with addition of 2 N HCl (50 mL) was refluxed for 4 h. After evaporation to dryness in vacuo, the crude oil was washed with water and then ethanol to provide pure 12a (12.7 g, 86%) as colorless crystals.
Method 2. (From 11a) To the solution of tert-butyl (Z)-2-(5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate (11a) (17.6 g, 50 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (250 mL), was added TFA (25 mL, 0.3 mol); then, reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 8 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dried under vacuum overnight to obtain 12a (14.4 g, 97%) as colorless crystals.
1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.90 (1H, s), 7.46 (2H, d, J = 8.4), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.4), 4.68 (2H, s). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.67, 164.34, 163.23, 137.60, 134.95, 131.55, 129.77, 119.39, 113.90, 44.82. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C12H8ClNO4S [M + H]+ 297.9935. Found: m/z 297.9991.
(Z)-2-(5-(3,4-Bis(phenylmethoxy)phenyl]methylene]-)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (12b) [12].
(From 10b) The same procedure as for 12a (Method 1) was carried out. (Z)-tert-Butyl 2-(5-(3,4-bisbenzyloxybenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetate 10b (26.5 g, 50 mmol) was used in the synthesis to give 12b (13.7 g, 58%) as colorless crystals.
(From 11b) The same procedure as for 12a (Method 2) was carried out using 11b (5.4 g, 10 mmol) and glacial acetic acid (17 mL) with 2 N HCl (4.2 mL) to give 1.6 g of 12b (34% yield).
(From 9) According to the method described for 4a, 3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzaldehyde (33.4 g, 0.105 mol) and (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (9) (17.5 g, 0.1 mol) were used to give 12b (32.8g, 69%), as colorless crystals.
1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.20 (1H, s), 7.68 (1H, s), 7.43 (4H, t, J = 7.9), 7.36 (4H, t, J = 7.5), 7.30 (2H, t, J = 7.4), 7.03 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.1), 6.99 (1H, d, J = 2.1), 6.96 (1H, d, J = 8.4), 5.21 (2H, s), 5.19 (2H, s). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.39, 166.89, 151.19, 148.77, 136.38, 136.24, 134.31, 128.63, 128.61, 128.10, 128.08, 127.23, 127.18, 126.06, 125.32, 119.64, 115.76, 114.08, 71.20, 70.88. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C26H21NO6S [M + H]+ 476.162. Found: m/z 476.1145.
(Z)-2-(5-(2,4-Dichlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid(12c). According to the method described for 4a, 2,4-dichlorobenzaldehyde (17.5 g, 0.105 mol) and (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (9) (17.5 g, 0.1 mol) were used to give 12c (28.8 g, 87%) as colorless crystals. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 13.46 (1H, br. s), 8.03 (1H, s), 7.88 (1H, s), 7.65 (2H, s), 4.41 (2H, s). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 168.26, 166.85, 164.97, 136.38, 135.91, 130.67, 130.43, 128.84, 128.29, 125.49, 42.88. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C12H7Cl2NO4S [M + H]+ 333.1585. Found: m/z 333.1608.
(Z)-2-(5-(2-Hydroxy-5-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid(12d). According to the method described for 4a, 2-hydroxy-5-chlorobenzaldehyde(13.3 g, 0.105 mol) and (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (9) (17.5 g, 0.1 mol) were used to give 12d (21.6 g, 69%) as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.30 (1H, s), 10.97 (1H, s), 8.01 (1H, s), 7.35 (1H, dd, J = 8.81, 2.35), 7.30 (1H, d, J = 1.97), 6.97 (1H, d, J = 8.81), 4.35 (2H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 168.41, 167.26, 165.46, 156.47, 132.51, 128.51, 128.32, 123.58, 121.75, 121.51, 118.36, 42.72. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C12H8ClNO5S [M + H]+ 313.9884. Found: m/z 313.9906.
(Z)-2-(5-(2-Hydroxy-3,5-dichlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (12e). According to the method described for 4a, 2-hydroxy-3,5-dichlorobenzaldehyde (20.0 g, 0.105 mol) and (2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (9) (17.5 g, 0.1 mol) were used to give 12e (24.7 g, 71%), as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.00 (1H, s), 7.61 (1H, d, J = 2.22), 7.28 (1H, d, J = 2.14), 4.35 (2H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 168.35, 167.10, 165.25, 152.24, 131.57, 128.42, 127.19, 124.60, 123.95, 123.82, 123.37, 42.83. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C12H7Cl2NO5S [M + H]+ 347.9495. Found: m/z 347.9496.
(Z)-5-(3,4-Bis(benzyloxy)benzylidene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (15b). According to the method described for 4a, 3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzaldehyde (31.8 g, 0.1 mol) and 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (13) (12.6 g, 0.095 mol) were used to give 15b (38.2 g, 93%), as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.45 (1H, s), 7.51 (1H, s), 7.46–7.43 (4H, m), 7.42 (2H, s), 7.37 (6H, td, J = 7.5, 4.1), 7.31 (3H, t, J = 7.3), 7.03 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.1), 6.98–6.96 (2H, m), 5.23 (3H, s), 5.21 (3H, s). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.39, 166.89, 151.19, 148.77, 136.38, 136.24, 134.31, 128.63, 128.61, 128.10, 128.08, 127.23, 127.18, 126.06, 125.32, 119.64, 115.76, 114.08, 71.20, 70.88. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C26H21NO5S2 [M + H]+ 492.0934. Found: m/z 492.0958.
(Z)-2-(5-(3,4-Bis(benzyloxy)benzylidene)-4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (17b) [12].
Method 1. (From 14) To a solution of 2-(4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (19 g, 0.1 mol) in AcOH (250 mL) were added 3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzaldehyde (33.4 g, 0.105 mol) and 33% aqueous methylamine (0.2 mL, 1.6 mmol). Reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h then poured into H2O to obtain a crude solid. The suspension was filtered and the precipitate recrystallized from i-PrOH to give 17b (35.4 g, 72%), as yellow crystals.
Method 2. (From 15b) To a solution of (Z)-5-(3,4-bis(benzyloxy)benzylidene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (15b) (4.17 g, 0.01 mol) in THF (50 mL), tert-butyl bromoacetate (1.78 mL, 0.011 mol) and K2CO3 (2.75 g, 0.02 mol) were added. The mixture was refluxed for 5 h, cooled to room temperature, filtrated, and then the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was redissolved in a mixture of CHCl3 (50 mL) and water (50 mL); organic layer was separated, dried by Na2SO4, and evaporated in vacuo and the residue used without additional purification for the hydrolysis with trifluoroacetic acid (25 mL) in CH2Cl2 (100 mL). The product was recrystallized in dry EtOH to give 17b (3.2 g, 65%) as colorless crystals.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d) δ: 13.7 (1H, br. s., OH), 7.52–7.44 (11H, m), 7.37–7.32 (3H, m), 5.19 (2H, s), 5.18 (2H, s). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d) δ 195.89 (C=S), 169.80 (C=O), 151.05, 148.66, 137.20, 132.41, 128.90, 128.40, 128.36, 128.04, 127.97, 126.28, 125.46, 123.05, 114.57, 70.46, 70.34. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C26H21NO5S2 [M + H]+ 492.5835. Found: m/z 492.5887.
(Z)-5-(2-Hydroxy-3,5-dichlorobenzylidene)-4-oxo-2-thioxo-3- thiazolidine acetic acid (17e). The same procedure as described for 17b (Method 1) was carried out using 2-(4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid (19 g, 0.1 mol) and 2-hydroxy-3,5-dichlorobenzaldehyde (20.0 g, 0.105 mol) to give 17e (20.7 g, 57%), as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.45 (1H, s), 10.97 (1H, s), 7.90 (1H, s), 7.69 (1H, d, J = 2.5), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 2.5), 4.73 (2H, s). 13C NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 193.28 (C2=S), 167.21(C4=O), 166.19, 131.57, 128.05, 127.79, 124.15, 124.05, 123.29, 45.01. HRMS (EI): Calcd for C12H7Cl2NO3S [M + H]+ 347.9317. Found: m/z 347.9474.

3.2. Biochemistry and Microbiology

3.2.1. MIC Determination

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the compounds obtained were determined using the microdilution method in RPMI 1640 medium buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS [74]. The test compounds were evaluated against human pathogens Candida spp and dermatophytes. Fluconazole was used as the reference antifungal drug. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO and serially diluted in nutrient medium (concentration range 0.125–128 mg/L). The inoculum suspension was added to each well and incubated at 35 °C. Microdilution plates were visually inspected after 24–48 h and 96 h of incubation for growth of yeast and filamentous fungi, respectively. MIC was defined as the minimum inhibitory concentration of the test compound which resulted in total inhibition of the fungal growth. All susceptibility testing was performed in triplicate. Clinical and reference strains of Candida spp. were: C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, C. albicans ATCC 24433, C. tropicalis 3019, C. kefyr 77, C. famata 312, C. guilliermondii 355, C. parapsilosis 58N, C. krusei 432M, and C. glabrata 61L. Clinical and reference strains of filamentous fungi were: A. niger 37a, Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC 46645, Microsporum canis B-200, and Trichophyton rubrum 2002.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, strain BY4741 (MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0) was inoculated into YPD medium (1% Yeast extract (w/v), 2% Peptone (w/v), 2% Glucose (w/v)) supplemented with 2-fold differing concentrations of Mycosidine (stock solution 20 mg/mL) in DMSO) and a constant concentration (0.05% v/v) of dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma) in 96 well plates (200 µL final volume), at an initial OD600 of 0.05. Cell growth was judged after 24 h of growth at 30 °C, with the MIC being the lowest concentration of drug where no growth was observed. Statistical processing of the data obtained, shown in the tables, was carried out by traditional methods of mathematical statistics using standard software for IBM PC: Microsoft Office Excel 2013. Differences in mean values and between groups were assessed using Student’s t-test, set at the level of p < 0.05.

3.2.2. Growth Assays and Cell Death Detection

S. cerevisiae, strain BY4742 (MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 ura3Δ0), and its derivative deletion strains, lacking the PDR5 and HXT3 genes (obtained from the Yeast Genome Deletion Collection) were grown in YPD medium to logarithmic phase (OD600 = 0.2–0.7). They were then either spotted onto solid YPD medium with different concentrations of Mycosidine at a starting OD600 of 1 with 10-fold serial dilutions (growth assays) or incubated in distilled water supplemented with different concentrations of Mycosidine for different periods of time (OD600 = 0.05), after which the treated cells were spotted onto YPD medium in stepwise 10-fold serial dilutions.

3.2.3. Flow Cytometric Analysis of Changes in GFP-Tagged Protein Abundance

Derivatives of the BY4741 strain obtained in [75], harboring C-terminal GFP tags on proteins of interest, were used to detect changes of protein level in response to drug treatment. Genes encoding these proteins were modified in the genome at their 3′-terminus, which corresponds to the C-terminus of the protein [75], i.e., the regulatory regions of the genes were identical to those of the wild-type proteins. In general, this type of tagging rarely interferes with protein function or regulation [77]. Cells bearing specific GFP fusions were pinned onto solid YPD medium (2% agar) (w/v), grown overnight to form small colonies, and then inoculated into liquid medium containing either the vehicle (DMSO) or Mycosidine and incubated for 6 h. One hour prior to the end of incubation, propidium iodide was added to the incubating cells at a concentration of (1 mcg/mL). After this, the control sample and drug-treated sample were analyzed on a Cytoflex S flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) equipped with a 96-well sampler. GFP fluorescence was assayed using the 488 nm laser and FITC filter, whereas propidium iodide staining was assayed with the 532 nm laser and the PE filter.
Raw data were analyzed using CytExpert software (Beckman Coulter), and graphs were obtained by exporting data to MS Excel. Heatmaps were obtained using MS Excel and they depict the log2 transformed ratio between the GFP fluorescence in the experimental sample divided by the control sample.

3.2.4. Sample Preparation for Cell Wall Investigation

C. parapsilosis 22,019 cells and C. albicans 10,231 cells were used for experiments. The topography of yeast cells was obtained in physiological saline at room temperature. A daily exposition of Candida suspension (103 CFU/mL) with drugs was performed in 5 mL petri dishes (GBO, Kremsmünster, Austria) modified with a layer of SYLGARD™ 527 A&B Silicone Dielectric Gel (Dow Chemical, Midland, MI, USA) to increase cell-surface adhesion and prevent sample drifting and reattachment. The surface of a petri dish was covered with the silicone gel with a ratio of components A and B in 1: 1 (by mass fraction) and kept in a laboratory drying cabinet Ulab UT-4686 (ULAB, Dhaka, Bangladesh) for an hour at 60 °C; then, the dishes were washed with distilled water. Concentration of cells in the suspension in physiological saline (PanEco, RF) was determined using hemocytometer (MiniMed, RF) and added to the modified petri dish. Dry drugs were dissolved in DMSO 99.7% (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and added to cells in physiological saline with final concentrations 16, 160 µg/mL of Mycosidine and 32, 320 µg/mL of 17. After incubation of cells for 24 h, the dishes were washed and filled with saline.

3.2.5. Scanning Ion-Conductance Microscopy (SICM)

SICM experiments were performed at room temperature by using SICM by ICAPPIC (ICAPPIC Ltd., London, UK) and borosilicate glass capillaries (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA). Nanopipettes were made from capillaries with an external diameter of 1.2 mm and an internal diameter of 0.69 mm on a P-2000 puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA). Topography was measured in saline [78] on cells immobilized on a layer of silicone dielectric gel. SICM measurements were performed using hopping mode protocol [79]. Set-point parameter of ion current feedback control was 0.2%, providing a minimal influence of nanopipette probe on the sample. The nanopipette radius ranged from 20 to 35 nm to achieve a nanoscale resolution of topography imaging. The radius of the nanopipette and the mechanical characteristics were calculated using formulas reported in previous studies [80]. Cell images were recorded on areas of 10 × 10 µm at 74 nm resolution and on areas of 1.5 × 1.5 µm for 21 nm resolution. The image dimensions were 256 × 256 pixels. For each concentration point, three to five large images were obtained for a total of 5 to 10 cells. Image processing was performed using the “SICMImageViewer” software.

4. Conclusions

Novel derivatives of Mycosidine—3,5-substituted thiazolidine-2,4-diones were synthesized in excellent yield using Knoevenagel synthesis and alkylation or acylation of the imide nitrogen. Furthermore, 5-Arylidene-2,4-thiazolidinediones and 2-thioxo analogs containing halogen and hydroxy groups or a di(benzyloxy) group in the 5-benzylidene moiety were evaluated for their in vitro antifungal activity. Some of them exhibited strong activity against filamentous fungi (Trichophyton rubrum and Microsporum canis) and Candida spp. yeasts. The compounds were characterized by chromatographic and spectrometric methods. The compounds exhibited both fungistatic and fungicidal activity and resulted in the emergence of morphological changes in the cell wall of the Candida yeast. Using limited proteomic screening and the analysis of toxicity in mutants, we show that Mycosidine activity is dependent on glucose transport. This suggests that this first-in-class antifungal and its derivatives have a novel mechanism of action, which deserves further study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph15050563/s1, Figure S1: Fragments of 1H NMR spectra of solution of 6a in DMSO-d6, recorded at 25 °C and 600 MHz at various time intervals after sample dissolution. Labeled are representative signals of initial compound and product of hydrolysis; Figure S2: Fragments of 1H NMR spectra of a solution of 7a in DMSO-d6, recorded at 25 °C at 600 MHz at various time intervals after sample dissolution. Figure S3: Fragments of 1H NMR spectra of a solution of 7a in CD3OH, recorded at 25 °C at 600 MHz at various time intervals after sample dissolution. Figure S4: Hydrolysis of 6a and 7a to 1,4a and benzoic acid in DMSO-d6 and CD3OD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.L., A.Y.S. and A.A.P.; methodology, A.A.A.; validation, E.S.M.O.G. and N.A.S.; investigation, A.Y.S., N.E.G., E.S.M.O.G., P.V.G., A.S.E., N.A.S. and V.I.P.; data curation, I.B.L., A.Y.S. and V.I.P.; writing—original draft preparation, I.B.L. and S.N.L.; writing—review and editing, I.B.L., A.A.P. and A.A.A.; visualization, P.V.G., A.S.E., N.A.S. and V.I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

1. This research was partially funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (#22-23-00160); 2. This research was partially funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (#21-74-10115) (study of changes in GFP-fusion protein levels in S. cerevisiae and sensitivity of mutant strains to Mycosidine) and the Ministry of Science and Higher education (determination of MICs and death assays in S. cerevisiae). ESMOG was partially funded by a joint scholarship (Executive Program) from the Arab Republic of Egypt and the Russian Federation; 3. NMR studies were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant #19-14-00115); 4. Scanning ion conductance microscopy experiments were carried out within the framework of the Implementation Program Priority 2030.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Files.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Moscow State University (Russia) for the opportunity to use the NMR facilities and to Oleg Saveliev for the expert technical assistance in the NMR measurements. V.I.P. acknowledges the support of the Interdisciplinary Scientific and Educational School of Moscow University (Molecular Technologies of the Living Systems and Synthetic Biology).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Tripathi, K.D. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, 3rd ed.; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1994; pp. 707–716. [Google Scholar]
  2. Denyer, S.P.; Hodges, N.; Gorman, S.P.; Gilmore, B.F. Hugo and Russell’s Pharmaceutical Microbiology, 8th ed.; A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Publication: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 191–193. [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, M.A.; Finkel, R.; Rey, J.A.; Whalen, K. Lippincott’s Illustrated Reviews: Pharmacology, 5th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012; pp. 429–440. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghannoum, M.; Arendrup, M.C.; Chaturvedi, V.P.; Lockhart, S.R.; McCormick, T.S.; Chaturvedi, S.; Berkow, E.L.; Juneja, D.; Tarai, B.; Azie, N.; et al. Ibrexafungerp: A Novel Oral Triterpenoid Antifungal in Development for the Treatment of Candida Auris Infections. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Georgopapadakou, N.H.; Tkacz, J.S. The Fungal Cell Wall as a Drug Target. Trends Microbiol. 1995, 3, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Georgopapadakou, N.H. Update on Antifungals Targeted to the Cell Wall: Focus on Β-1,3-Glucan Synthase Inhibitors. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2001, 10, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cortes, J.C.G.; Curto, M.Á.; Carvalho, V.S.; Perez, P.; Ribas, J.C. The Fungal Cell Wall as a Target for the Development of New Antifungal Therapies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Perlin, D.S. Cell Wall-Modifying Antifungal Drugs. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 425, 255–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ibe, C.; Munro, C.A. Fungal cell wall: An Underexploited Target for Antifungal Therapies. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gow, N.A.R.; Latge, J.P.; Munro, C.A. The Fungal Cell Wall: Structure, Biosynthesis and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. LeBlanc, E.V.; Polvi, E.J.; Veri, A.O.; Prive, G.G.; Cowen, L.E. Structure-guided Approaches to Targeting Stress Responses in Human Fungal Pathogens. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 14458–14472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Galley, C.M.S.; Neuss, J.C.; Orchard, M.G. Benzylidene thiazolidinediones and their use as antimycotic agents. Patent WO2002017915 A1, 7 March 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Orchard, M.G.; Neuss, J.C.; Galley, C.M.S.; Carr, A.; Porter, D.W.; Smith, P.; Scopes, D.I.C.; Haydon, D.; Vousden, K.; Stubberfield, C.R.; et al. Rhodanine-3-acetic acid Derivatives as Inhibitors of Fungal Protein Mannosyl Transferase 1 (PMT1). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3975–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brown, F.C. 4-Thiazolidinones. Chem. Rev. 1961, 61, 463–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, S.P.; Parimar, S.S.; Stenberg, V.I. Chemistry and biological activity of thiazolidinones. Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 175–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lesik, R.B.; Zimenkovsky, B.S. 4-Thiazolidones: Centenarian History, Current Status and Perspectives for Modern Organic and Medicinal Chemistry. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 1547–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jain, A.K.; Vaidya, A.; Ravichandran, V.; Kashaw, S.K.; Agrawal, R.K. Recent Developments and Biological Activities of Thiazolidinone Derivatives: A Review. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 3378–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jain, V.S.; Vora, D.K.; Ramaa, C.S. Thiazolidine-2,4-Diones: Progress Towards Multifarious Applications. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 1599–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Desai, N.C.; Pandit, U.P.; Dodiya, A. Thiazolidinedione Compounds: A Patent Review (2010 present). ExpertOpin. Ther. Pat. 2015, 25, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chadha, N.; Bahia, M.S.; Kaur, M.; Silakari, O. Thiazolidine-2,4-Dione Derivatives: Programmed Chemical Weapons for Key Protein Targets of Various Pathological Conditions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 2953–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manjal, S.K.; Kaur, R.; Bhatia, R.; Kumar, K.; Singh, V.; Shanka, R.; Kaur, R.; Rawal, R.K. Synthetic and Medicinal Perspective of Thiazolidinones: A Review. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 75, 406–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mounika, P.; Aishwarya, M.N.L.; Sikdar, P.; Prathima, S.; Babu, M.N. A Review on Thiazolidinedione. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 7, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tahlan, S.S.; Verma, P.K. Biological Potential of Thiazolidinedione Derivatives of Synthetic Origin. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Naim, M.J.; Alam, M.J.; Ahmad, S.; Nawaz, F.; Shrivastava, N.; Sahu, M.; Alam, O. Therapeutic Journey of 2,4-Thiazolidinediones as a Versatile Scaffold: An Insight Into Structure Activity Relationship. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 129, 218–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sethi, N.S.; Prasad, D.N.; Singh, R.K. An Insight into the Synthesis and SAR of 2,4-Thiazolidinediones (2,4-TZD) as Multifunctional Scaffold: A Review. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 308–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bireddy, S.R.; Konkala, V.S.; Godugu, C.; Dubey, P.K. A Review on the Synthesis and Biological Studies of 2,4-Thiazolidinedione Derivatives. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2020, 17, 958–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Agrawal, N. Synthetic and Therapeutic Potential of 4-Thiazolidinone and its Analogs. Curr. Chem. Lett. 2021, 10, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wiesenberg, I.; Chiesi, M.; Missbach, M.; Spanka, C.; Pignat, W.; Carlberg, C. Specific activation of the nuclear receptors PPARgamma and RORA by the antidiabetic thiazolidinedione BRL 49653 and the antiarthritic thiazolidinedione derivative CGP 52608. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998, 53, 1131. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tomašic, T.; Zidar, N.; Mueller-Premru, M.; Kikelj, D.L.; Peterlin, M.L. Discovery of Novel 5-Benzylidenerhodanine and 5-Benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione Inhibitors of MurD Ligase. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6584–6594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zidar, N.; Tomašić, T.; Šink, R.; Kovač, A.; Patin, D.; Blanot, D.; Contreras-Martel, C.; Dessen, A.; Premru, M.; Zega, A.; et al. New 5-Benzylidenethiazolidin-4-one Inhibitors of Bacterial Murd Ligase: Design, Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Biological Evaluation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 5512–5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zvarec, O.; Polyak, S.W.; Tieu, W.; Kuan, K.; Dai, H.; Pedersen, D.S.; Morona, R.; Zhang, L.; Booker, G.W.; Abell, A.D. 5-Benzylidenerhodanine and 5-Benzylidene-2,4-thiazolidinedione Based Antibacterials. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sortino, M.; Delgado, P.; Juarez, S.; Quiroga, J.; Abonia, R.; Insuasty, B.; Nogueras, M.; Rodero, L.; Garibotto, F.M.; Enriz, R.D.; et al. Synthesis and antifungal activity of (Z)-5-arylidenerhodanines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, L.A.; Xie, C.F.; Ma, Y.H.; Liu, J.A.; Xiang, M.L.; Ye, X.; Zheng, H.; Chen, Z.Z.; Xu, Q.Y.; Chen, T.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 5-Benzylidenethiazolidine-Derivatives 2,4-Dione Derivatives for the Treatment of Infammatory Diseases. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2060–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rekha, S.; Shanthram, U.; Vineet, C. Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Thiazolidinedionesforanti Inflammatory Activity. IRJP 2011, 2, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  35. Azam, F.; Prasad, M.V.; Thangavel, V. Targeting Oxidative Stress Component in the Therapeutics of Epilepsy. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 994–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Salamone, S.; Colin, C.; Grillier-Vuissoz, I.; Kuntz, S.; Mazerbourg, S.; Flament, S.; Martin, H.; Richert, L.; Chapleur, Y.; Boisbrun, M. Synthesis of New Troglitazone Derivatives: Anti-Proliferative Activity in Breast Cancer Cell Lines and Preliminary Toxicological Study. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 51, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Long, N.; Le Gresley, A.; Wren, S.P. Thiazolidinediones: An In–Depth Study of Their Synthesis and Application to Medicinal Chemistry in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 1717–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Besstina, E.L.; Tunde, O.A.; Moss, P.E.; Stewart, L.V. Thiazolidinediones Regulate Expression of Cell Cycle Proteins in Human Prostate Cancer Cells via Pparγ-Dependent and Pparγ-Independent Pathways. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wei, S.; Yang, J.; Lee, S.L.; Kulp, S.K.; Chen, C.S. PPARgamma-Independent Antitumor Effects of Thiazolidinediones. Cancer Lett. 2009, 276, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bhanushali, U.; Rajendran, S.; Sarma, K.; Kulkarni, P.; Chatti, K.; Chatterjee, S.; Ramaa, C.S. 5-Benzylidene-2,4-thiazolidenedione Derivatives: Design, Synthesis and Evaluation as Inhibitors of Angiogenesis Targeting VEGR-2. Bioorg. Chem. 2016, 67, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Joshi, H.; Pal, T.; Ramaa, C.S. A New Dawn for the Use of Thiazolidinediones in Cancer Therapy. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2014, 23, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shah, D.K.; Menon, K.M.J.; Cabrera, L.M.; Vahratian, A.; Kavoussi, S.K.; Lebovic, D.I. Thiazolidinediones Decrease Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Production b Human Luteinized Granulosa Cells In Vitro. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 93, 2042–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Joseph, A.; Shah, C.S.; Kumar, S.S.; Alex, A.T.; Maliyakkal, N.; Moorkoth, S.; Mathew, J.E. Synthesis, In Vitro Anticancer and Antioxidant Activity of Thiadiazole Substituted Thiazolidin-4-Ones. Acta Pharm. 2013, 63, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ramirez, M.A.; Borja, N.L. Epalrestat: An Aldose Reductase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathy. Pharmacotherapy 2008, 28, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Levshin, I.B.; Glushkov, R.G.; Silin, V.A.; Padejskaja, E.N. Benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-Diones Showing Antimicrobial Activity. SU1417436A1, 10 December 1986. [Google Scholar]
  46. Glushkov, R.G.; Levchuk, T.A.; Shilova, I.B.; Gus’kova, T.A. Pharmaceutical Composition For Treatment of Fungal Disease and Method For Its Preparing. RU Patent 2295958 C1, 27 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
  47. Puchkina, T.V.; Shilova, I.B.; Sharova, S.A.; Chistykov, V.V.; Stepanova, E.V.; Novoselov, A.U.; Koshichkina, N.V.; Kozukova, O.A. Experimental and Clinical Study of A New Thiazolidine-2,4-Dione-Mycosidine Derivative Ointment in Treatment of Smooth Skin Dermatomycoses. Adv. Med. Mycol. 2007, 10, 94–95. [Google Scholar]
  48. Levshin, I.B.; Stovbun, S.V.; Gomberg, M.A.; Bibikova, M.V. Study of the Mechanism of Action of an Original Domestic Drug From A New Class of Antimycotics-Thiazolidin-2,4-dione Derivatives. Adv. Med. Mycol. 2014, 12, 415–417. [Google Scholar]
  49. Shilova, I.B. Study of a Thiazolidine-2,4-Dione Derivative (Mycosidine) as a Potential Antifungal Agent. Ph.D. Thesis, TsHLS-VNIHFI, Moscow, Russia, 30 May 2007. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  50. Nawale, S.L.; Dhake, A.S. Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Thiazolidinedione Derivatives for Antibacterial Activity. Der Pharma Chem. 2012, 4, 2270–2277. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tran, H.Q.; Nguyen, H.C.; Van Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Vo, T.N.; Nguyend, C.T. Synthesis and Evaluation of Cytotoxic Activity on Mcf-7 Cell Line of Some Diesters Derived from 5-(Hydroxybenzylidene)Thiazolidine-2,4-Diones. Acta Chemica IASI 2018, 26, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mousseron, M. 5-substituted thiazolidine-4-one and process for production thereof. Patent CA897687A, 11 April 1972. [Google Scholar]
  53. Levshin, I.B.; Tsurkan, A.A.; V’yunov, K.A.; Ginak, A.I. Preparation Method of 5-Arylideneselena- and Thiazolidine-2,4-Diones. Chem. Inf. 1983, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Popov-Pergal, K.M.; Poleti, D.; Rančić, M.P.; Meden, A.; Pergal, M.V. Synthesis and Structure of New 5-(Arylidene)-3-(4-methylbenzoyl)thiazolidine-2,4-diones. J. Het. Chem. 2010, 47, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shaikh, F.M.; Navin, B.; Patel, B.; Rajani, D. Synthesis of New Thiazolidine Derivatives and Their Antimicrobial and Antitubercular Activity. Ind. J. Res. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2013, 1, 496–503. [Google Scholar]
  56. Levshin, I.B.; Rastorgueva, N.A.; Kiselev, A.V.; Vedenkin, A.S.; Stovbun, S.V.; Churakov, A.V.; Saveliev, O.Y.; Polshakov, V.I. Thiazolidine-2,4-dione in Benzoylation Reaction. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2019, 55, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhat, B.A.; Ponnala, S.; Sahu, D.P.; Tiwari, P.; Tripathi, B.K.; Srivastava, A.K. Synthesis and Antihyperglycemic Activity Profiles of Novel Thiazolidinedione Derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5857–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bruno, G.; Costantino, L.; Curinga, C.; Maccari, R.; Monforte, F.; Nicolo, F.; Ottana, R.; Vigorita, M.G. Synthesis and Aldose Reductase Inhibitory Activity of 5-Arylidene-2,4-thiazolidinediones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sambasivarao, S.V.; Soni, L.K.; Arun, K.; Gupta, A.K.; Hanumantharao, P.; Kaskhedikar, S.G. Quantitative Structure–Activity Analysis of 5-Arylidene-2,4-Thiazolidinediones as Aldose Reductase Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maccari, R.; Ottana, R.; Curinga, C.; Vigorita, M.G.; Rakowitz, D.; Steindl, T.; Langer, T. Structure–Activity Relationships and Molecular Modelling of 5-Arylidene-2,4-Thiazolidinediones Active as Aldose Reductase Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 2809–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maccari, R.; Ottana, R.; Ciurleo, R.; Vigorita, M.G.; Rakowitz, D.; Steind, T.; Langer, T. Evaluation of In Vitro Aldose Redutase Inhibitory Activity of 5-Arylidene-2,4-Thiazolidinediones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3886–3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Maccari, R.; Vitale, R.M.; Ottanà, R.; Rocchiccioli, M.; Marrazzo, A.; Venera, C.V.; Graziano, A.C.E.; Amodeo, P.; Mura, U.; Del Corso, A. Structure-Activity Relationships and Molecular Modelling of New 5-Arylidene-4-Thiazolidinone Derivatives As Aldose Reductase Inhibitors and Potential Anti-Inflammatory Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 81, 316082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Datar, P.A.; Aher, S.B. Design and Synthesis of Novel Thiazolidine-2,4-diones As Hypoglycemic Agents. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2012, 12, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. El-Adl, K.; El-Helby, A.-G.A.; Sakr, H.; Eissa, I.H.; El-Hddad, S.S.A.; Shoman, F.M.I.A. Design, Synthesis, Molecular Docking and Anticancer Evaluations of 5-Benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-Dione Derivatives Targeting VEGFR-2 Enzyme. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 102, 104059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alegaon, S.G.; Alagawadi, K.R.; Pawar, S.M.; Vinod, D.; Rajput, U. Synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation of thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives. Med. Chem. Res. 2014, 23, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Froes, T.Q.; Chaves, B.T.; Mendes, M.S.; Ximenes, R.M.; da Silva, I.M.; da Silva, P.B.G.; de Albuquerque, J.F.C.; Castilho, M.S. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Thiazolidinedione Derivatives with High Ligand Efficiency to P. Aeruginosa PhzS. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021, 36, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kumar, B.R.P.; Karvekar, M.D.; Adhikary, L.; Nanjan, M.J.; Suresh, D. Microwave Induced Synthesis of the Thiazolidine-2,4-dione Motif and the Efficient Solvent Free-Solid Phase Parallel Syntheses of 5-Benzylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione and 5-Benzylidene-2-thioxo-thiazolidine-4-one Compounds. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 43, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xia, Z.; Knaak, C.; Ma, J.; Beharry, Z.M.; McInnes, C.; Wang, W.; Kraft, A.; Smith, C.D. Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Inhibitors of Pim-1 and Pim-2 Protein Kinases. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. da Silva, I.M.; da Silva Filho, J.; Santiago, P.B.; do Egito, M.S.; de Souza, C.A.; Gouveia, F.L.; Ximenes, R.M.; de Sena, K.X.; de Faria, A.R.; Brondani, D.J.; et al. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activities of 5-Arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione Derivatives. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 316082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Leite, F.; Santiago, P.; Froes, T.Q.; da Silva Filho, J.; da Silva, S.G.; Ximenes, R.M.; de Faria, A.R.; Brondani, D.J.; de Albuquerque, J.; Castilho, M.S. Structure-guided discovery of thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives as a novel class of Leishmania major pteridine reductase 1 inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 123, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Naeem, F.; Nadeem, H.; Muhammad, A.; Muhammad, Z.M.A.; Saeed, A. Synthesis, α-Amylase Inhibitory Activity and Molecular Docking Studies of 2,4-Thiazolidinedione Derivatives. Open Chem. J. 2018, 5, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tiekat, K.; Upadhyay, N.; Schweipert, M.; Hess, J.D.; Macias, L.H.; Mrowka, P.; Meyer-Almes, F.-J.; Aguilera, R.J.; Iancu, C.V.; Choe, J.-Y.; et al. Permuted 2,4-Thiazolidinedione (TZD) Analogs As GLUT Inhibitors and Their In-Vitro Evaluation in Leukemic Cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 154, 105512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing for Yeasts, 4th ed.; CLSI Standard M27; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  74. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi, 2nd ed.; Approved Standard. Document M-38A2; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  75. Soste, M.; Hrabakova, R.; Wanka, S.; Melnik, A.; Boersema, P.; Maiolica, A.; Wernas, T.; Tognetti, M.; von Mering, C.; Picotti, P.A. Sentinel Protein Assay for Simultaneously Quantifying Cellular Processes. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 1045–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Giaever, G.; Chu, A.M.; Ni, L.; Connelly, C.; Riles, L.; Véronneau, S.; Dow, S.; Lucau-Danila, A.; Anderson, K.; André, B. Functional Profiling of the Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Genome. Nature 2002, 418, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Galkina, K.V.; Finkelberg, J.M.; Markova, O.V.; Azbarova, A.V.; Banerjee, A.; Kumari, S.; Sokolov, S.S.; Severin, F.F.; Prasad, R.; Knorre, D.A. Protonophore FCCP Provides Fitness Advantage To PDR-Deficient Yeast Cells. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2020, 52, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ho, B.; Baryshnikova, A.; Brown, G.W. Unification of Protein Abundance Datasets Yields a Quantitative Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteome. Cell Syst. 2018, 6, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Novak, P.; Li, C.; Shevchuk, A.I.; Stepanyan, R.; Caldwell, M.; Hughes, S.; Smart, T.G.; Gorelik, J.; Ostanin, V.P.; Lab, M.J.; et al. Nanoscale Live-Cell Imaging Using Hopping Probe Ion Conductance Microscopy. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Kolmogorov, V.S.; Erofeev, A.S.; Woodcock, E.; Efremov, Y.M.; Iakovlev, A.P.; Savin, N.A.; Alova, A.V.; Lavrushkina, S.V.; Kireev, I.I.; Prelovskaya, A.O.; et al. Mapping Mechanical Properties of Living Cells At Nanoscale Using Intrinsic Nanopipette–Sample Force Interactions. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 6558–6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Clarke, R.W.; Novak, P.; Zhukov, A.; Tyler, E.J.; Cano-Jaimez, M.; Drews, A.; Richards, O.; Volynski, K.; Bishop, C.; Klenerman, D. Low Stress Ion Conductance Microscopy of Sub-Cellular Stiffness. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 7953–7958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Abd Alhameed, R.; Almarhoon, Z.B.S.I.; El-Faham, A.; de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Series of Thiazolidine-2,4-diones Carboxamide and Amino Acid Derivatives. Molecules 2020, 25, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (I) General structure of 2-(4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives, PMT1 inhibitors; (II) Structure of thiazolidine-2,4-dione (TZD).
Figure 1. (I) General structure of 2-(4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives, PMT1 inhibitors; (II) Structure of thiazolidine-2,4-dione (TZD).
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 g001
Figure 2. Structure of glitazones.
Figure 2. Structure of glitazones.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 g002
Figure 3. Epalrestat (I) (aldose reductase inhibitor); Mycosidine (II) (topical antifungal).
Figure 3. Epalrestat (I) (aldose reductase inhibitor); Mycosidine (II) (topical antifungal).
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 g003
Scheme 1. General synthesis of 3-alkoxycarbonyl derivatives of TZD 5ae. Reagents and conditions: (i) toluene, NEt3, rt; (ii) AcOH, MeNH2, reflux; (iii) EtOH, piperidine, reflux.
Scheme 1. General synthesis of 3-alkoxycarbonyl derivatives of TZD 5ae. Reagents and conditions: (i) toluene, NEt3, rt; (ii) AcOH, MeNH2, reflux; (iii) EtOH, piperidine, reflux.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 sch001
Figure 4. Chemical structure of ethyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5a).
Figure 4. Chemical structure of ethyl (Z)-5-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidine-3-carboxylate (5a).
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 g004
Scheme 2. Benzoylation of TZD.
Scheme 2. Benzoylation of TZD.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the target 3-benzoyl-5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione 7a,b. Reagents and conditions: (iv) dry acetone, K2CO3, 60 °C.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the target 3-benzoyl-5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione 7a,b. Reagents and conditions: (iv) dry acetone, K2CO3, 60 °C.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 2-(5-arylidene-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives. Reagents and conditions: (v) DMF, K2CO3, 80 °C; (vi) CH3COOH/HCl reflux; (vii) CF3COOH/CH2Cl2, r.t.; (ii) AcOH, MeNH2, reflux; (iii) EtOH, piperidine, reflux.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 2-(5-arylidene-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives. Reagents and conditions: (v) DMF, K2CO3, 80 °C; (vi) CH3COOH/HCl reflux; (vii) CF3COOH/CH2Cl2, r.t.; (ii) AcOH, MeNH2, reflux; (iii) EtOH, piperidine, reflux.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of 2-(2-thioxo-5-arylidene-4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives. Reagents and conditions: (v) DMF, K2CO3, 80 °C; (ii) AcOH, MeNH2, reflux; (vii) CF3COOH/CH2Cl2, r.t.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of 2-(2-thioxo-5-arylidene-4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetic acid derivatives. Reagents and conditions: (v) DMF, K2CO3, 80 °C; (ii) AcOH, MeNH2, reflux; (vii) CF3COOH/CH2Cl2, r.t.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 sch005
Figure 5. Effects of Mycosidine on cell growth and death and levels of several GFP-tagged proteins in S. cerevisiae yeast. (A) Spotting of BY4741 yeast treated with Mycosidine onto YPD shows that the drug efficiently kills yeast cells but only after a 24-h incubation; (B) Flow-cytometric analysis of GFP-fusion protein fluorescence in yeast cells shows that Pdr5 and Hxt3 are induced after 0.5×MIC (7.8 mg/L) treatment of S. cerevisiae cells by Mycosidine. Presented data are median fluorescence values for living cells (negative for PI staining); (C) Yeast strains (BY4742) with deletions of the noted genes were spotted onto YPD plates containing the noted concentrations of Mycosidine. Deletion of the Pdr5 gene did not cause increased sensitivity to Mycosidine, whereas deletion of HXT3 did; (D) Distributions of Htb2-GFP fluorescence in live cells treated with different concentrations of Mycosidine. Sub1C (orange), 1C (green), and 2C (grey) denote the putative amount of DNA in the cells. The percentage of cells in each population is noted.
Figure 5. Effects of Mycosidine on cell growth and death and levels of several GFP-tagged proteins in S. cerevisiae yeast. (A) Spotting of BY4741 yeast treated with Mycosidine onto YPD shows that the drug efficiently kills yeast cells but only after a 24-h incubation; (B) Flow-cytometric analysis of GFP-fusion protein fluorescence in yeast cells shows that Pdr5 and Hxt3 are induced after 0.5×MIC (7.8 mg/L) treatment of S. cerevisiae cells by Mycosidine. Presented data are median fluorescence values for living cells (negative for PI staining); (C) Yeast strains (BY4742) with deletions of the noted genes were spotted onto YPD plates containing the noted concentrations of Mycosidine. Deletion of the Pdr5 gene did not cause increased sensitivity to Mycosidine, whereas deletion of HXT3 did; (D) Distributions of Htb2-GFP fluorescence in live cells treated with different concentrations of Mycosidine. Sub1C (orange), 1C (green), and 2C (grey) denote the putative amount of DNA in the cells. The percentage of cells in each population is noted.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 g005
Figure 6. SICM images of topography of Candida cells (C. parapsilosis and C. albicans) before and after treatment with Mycosidine and 17b at MIC and 10×MIC.
Figure 6. SICM images of topography of Candida cells (C. parapsilosis and C. albicans) before and after treatment with Mycosidine and 17b at MIC and 10×MIC.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 g006
Table 1. 1H Chemical shifts of 5a in DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 at 400 MHz.
Table 1. 1H Chemical shifts of 5a in DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 at 400 MHz.
SolventChemical Shift, ppm
CH (6)Har (2′,3′,5′,6′)CH2 (9)CH3 (10)
DMSO-d67.907.59–7.674.421.32
CDCl37.857.41–7.464.501.43
Table 2. 13C Chemical shifts of 5a in CDCl3 (100 MHz).
Table 2. 13C Chemical shifts of 5a in CDCl3 (100 MHz).
AtomC(2)C(4)C(5)C(6)C(7)C(9)C(10)C(1′)C(2′)
C(6′)
C(3′)
C(5′)
C(4′)
δ (13C) ppm163.3162.4120.4134.0147.366.013.9137.2131.4129.6131.2
Table 3. Antifungal activity of synthesized compounds (MIC in mg/L). Experiments were performed at least 3 times.
Table 3. Antifungal activity of synthesized compounds (MIC in mg/L). Experiments were performed at least 3 times.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00563 i001
R1R2C. albicans ATCC 24433
24h   48h
A. niger 37aA. fumigatus ATCC 46645M. canis B-200T. rubrum
2002
4a4-ClH>128>12864>641632
4b3,4-(OBn)2H>128>128>64>64>32>32
4c2,4-di-ClH>128>12864>6464128
4d2-OH-5-ClH646416326416
4e2-OH-3,5-di-ClH83216323216
15b3,4-(OBn)2H32>64>64>64>64>64
5a4-ClCOOEt8–16161488
5b4-ClCOOi-Bu488–16164–88
5c4-ClCOOAll8881684
5d4-ClCOOPh16643264432
5e4-ClCOOBn>64>6464>641632
7a4-ClCOPh832326448–16
7b3,4-(OBn)2COPh>128>12532>64>64>64
10a4-ClCH2COOt-Bu32–6464>64>64>64>64
10b3,4-(OBn)2CH2COOt-Bu>32>64>64>64>64>64
11a4-ClCH2COOEt32–64>64>64>64>64>64
11b3,4-(OBn)2CH2COOEt>64>64>64>64>64>64
12a4-ClCH2COOH32>6464>6432–6432
12b3,4-(OBn)2CH2COOH64>64>64>64>64>64
12c2,4-Cl2CH2COOH32>3216216–3232
12d2-OH-5-ClCH2COOH32>644–8161616
12e2-OH-3,5-di-ClCH2COOH0.1250.58161616
17b3,4-(OBn)2CH2COOH64>64>64>64>64>64
17e2-OH-3,5-di-ClCH2COOH81681628
Mycosidine (R1 = 4-Cl, R2 = COOMe)16324844
Fluconazole432>64>641664
Table 4. Microbiological activity of some TZD derivatives on clinical strains of Candida spp fungi; n.d.—no data. Flc = fluconazole.
Table 4. Microbiological activity of some TZD derivatives on clinical strains of Candida spp fungi; n.d.—no data. Flc = fluconazole.
MicroorganismMIC (µg/mL)
Flc25a7a12e
24 h48 h24 h48 h24 h48 h24 h48 h
C. parapsilosis ATCC 220194163216323264<0.1250.5
C. albicans ATCC 2443348168168320.1250.25
C. tropicalis 301923264323264646464
C. kefyr 77n.d.81681616326464
C. famata 312n.d.3264323264>64>64>64
C. guilliermondii 355n.d.6464n.d.n.d.64646464
C. parapsilosis 58Nn.d.6464n.d.n.d.6464>64>64
C. krusei 432M>321632161632646464
C. glabrata 61L3281681616326464
C. albicans 604M>32326432326464>64>64
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Levshin, I.B.; Simonov, A.Y.; Lavrenov, S.N.; Panov, A.A.; Grammatikova, N.E.; Alexandrov, A.A.; Ghazy, E.S.M.O.; Savin, N.A.; Gorelkin, P.V.; Erofeev, A.S.; et al. Antifungal Thiazolidines: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Mycosidine Congeners. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050563

AMA Style

Levshin IB, Simonov AY, Lavrenov SN, Panov AA, Grammatikova NE, Alexandrov AA, Ghazy ESMO, Savin NA, Gorelkin PV, Erofeev AS, et al. Antifungal Thiazolidines: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Mycosidine Congeners. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(5):563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Levshin, Igor B., Alexander Y. Simonov, Sergey N. Lavrenov, Alexey A. Panov, Natalia E. Grammatikova, Alexander A. Alexandrov, Eslam S. M. O. Ghazy, Nikita A. Savin, Peter V. Gorelkin, Alexander S. Erofeev, and et al. 2022. "Antifungal Thiazolidines: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Mycosidine Congeners" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 5: 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050563

APA Style

Levshin, I. B., Simonov, A. Y., Lavrenov, S. N., Panov, A. A., Grammatikova, N. E., Alexandrov, A. A., Ghazy, E. S. M. O., Savin, N. A., Gorelkin, P. V., Erofeev, A. S., & Polshakov, V. I. (2022). Antifungal Thiazolidines: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Mycosidine Congeners. Pharmaceuticals, 15(5), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15050563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop