Functional Materials for ICE and IVUS Piezoelectric Transducers: A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. ICE and IVUS Transducers
2.1. ICE/IVUS Piezoelectric Transducers: Typical Structure and Development Trends
2.2. The Piezoelectric Materials Applied in ICE and IVUS Transducers
2.2.1. Achieving Moderate Frequencies with Reliable Performance: PZT Ceramics in ICE Applications
2.2.2. Pursuing High-Frequency Operation and Wide Bandwidth: PMN-PT Single Crystals for IVUS
2.2.3. Maximizing Bandwidth Through Composite Architectures
2.2.4. Lead-Free Alternatives: Balancing Environmental Requirements with Performance Gaps
2.2.5. Comparative Framework for Material Selection
2.2.6. Fundamental Trade-Offs in Miniature Transducer Design
2.3. Lens/Catheter Sheath Materials
- Temperature Dependence: Polyurethane materials exhibit a negative temperature coefficient of sound velocity (unlike water, blood, and muscle, which show positive coefficients). For RP 6400, Bacon 430, and Santoprene, the velocity decreases by approximately 60–124 m/s when temperature increases from 25 °C to 37 °C.
- Measurement Methods: Data from Guess and Campbell [49] were obtained using a Fourier transform pulse-echo method with temperature controlled at 37 °C ± 0.05 °C. Data from Stephens et al. [51] were derived from array transmission measurements; specific methodology was not detailed, and direct quantitative comparison with pulse-echo data should be made with caution.
- Acoustic Impedance Calculation: Z = ρ × Vl, calculated from measured density and sound velocity values. Minor discrepancies with original publications may reflect rounding or measurement uncertainties.
- Hardness Designation: Shore hardness values: D = Shore D scale (harder materials), A = Shore A scale (softer materials).
2.4. The Matching Layers
2.5. The Backing Layer Materials
2.6. The Connection and Isolation in ICE and IVUS Transducer, Acoustically and Electrically
3. Conclusions and Perspectives
3.1. Functional Materials, Design Principles and Recent Advances in ICE/IVUS Micro-Transducers
3.2. Potential Optimization Directions for 4D ICE Real-Time 3D Reconstruction
3.3. Integrated IVUS and OCT Catheter
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alqahtani, F.; Bhirud, A.; Aljohani, S.; Mills, J.; Kawsara, A.; Runkana, A.; Alkhouli, M. Intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography to guide transcatheter closure of interatrial communications: Nationwide trend and comparative analysis. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2017, 30, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojadidi, M.K.; Gevorgyan, R.; Tobis, J.M. A Comparison of Methods to Detect and Quantitate PFO: TCD, TTE, ICE and TEE. In Patent Foramen Ovale; Amin, Z., Tobis, J.M., Sievert, H., Carroll, J.D., Eds.; Springer London: London, UK, 2015; pp. 55–65. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.H.; Oh, S.; Ko, Y.G.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, S.J.; Hong, S.J.; Ahn, C.M.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, B.K.; Ko, K.Y.; et al. Comparison of intracardiac echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography for guidance during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Korean Circ. J. 2024, 54, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mathur, S.K.; Singh, P. Transoesophageal echocardiography related complications. Indian. J. Anaesth. 2009, 53, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jongbloed, M.R.; Schalij, M.J.; Zeppenfeld, K.; Oemrawsingh, P.V.; van der Wall, E.E.; Bax, J.J. Clinical applications of intracardiac echocardiography in interventional procedures. Heart 2005, 91, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freitas-Ferraz, A.B.; Bernier, M.; Vaillancourt, R.; Ugalde, P.A.; Nicodème, F.; Paradis, J.-M.; Champagne, J.; O’Hara, G.; Junquera, L.; Val, D.d.; et al. Safety of Transesophageal Echocardiography to Guide Structural Cardiac Interventions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 3164–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Fujii, K.; Sonoda, S.; Tsujita, K.; Hibi, K.; Morino, Y.; Okura, H.; Ikari, Y.; Kozuma, K.; et al. CVIT 2025 clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther. 2025, 40, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Räber, L.; Mintz, G.S.; Koskinas, K.C.; Johnson, T.W.; Holm, N.R.; Onuma, Y.; Radu, M.D.; Joner, M.; Yu, B.; Jia, H.; et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: Guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3281–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeger, R.V.; Eccleshall, S.; Wan Ahmad, W.A.; Ge, J.; Poerner, T.C.; Shin, E.S.; Alfonso, F.; Latib, A.; Ong, P.J.; Rissanen, T.T.; et al. Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020, 13, 1391–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.F.; Ge, Z.; Kong, X.Q.; Chen, X.; Han, L.; Qian, X.S.; Zuo, G.F.; Wang, Z.M.; Wang, J.; Song, J.X.; et al. Intravascular Ultrasound vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty: The ULTIMATE III Trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2024, 17, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, C.; Wu, H.; Kim, S.; Dai, X.; Jiang, X. Recent Advances in Transducers for Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging. Sensors 2021, 21, 3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, J.-H.; Chang, J.-H. Mechanically rotating intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) transducer: A review. Sensors 2021, 21, 3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leuzzi, F.; Formisano, C.; Cerrato, E.; Maione, A.; Attisano, T.; Meucci, F.; Ciccarelli, M.; Vecchione, C.; Galasso, G.; Di Muro, F.M. Intracardiac Echocardiography in Structural Heart Interventions: A Comprehensive Overview. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, W.; Griffin, W.; Wildes, D.; Buckley, D.; Topka, T.; Chodakauskas, T.; Langer, M.; Calisti, S.; Bergstøl, S.; Malacrida, J.P.; et al. A 10-Fr ultrasound catheter with integrated micromotor for 4-D intracardiac echocardiography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2011, 58, 1478–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wildes, D.; Lee, W.; Haider, B.; Cogan, S.; Sundaresan, K.; Mills, D.M.; Yetter, C.; Hart, P.H.; Haun, C.R.; Concepcion, M.; et al. 4-D ICE: A 2-D Array Transducer With Integrated ASIC in a 10-Fr Catheter for Real-Time 3-D Intracardiac Echocardiography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2016, 63, 2159–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, G.H.L.; Zaid, S.; Hahn, R.T.; Aggarwal, V.; Alkhouli, M.; Aman, E.; Berti, S.; Chandrashekhar, Y.S.; Chadderdon, S.M.; D’Agostino, A.; et al. Structural Heart Imaging Using 3-Dimensional Intracardiac Echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2025, 18, 93–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalili, H.; Patton, M.; Taii, H.A.; Bansal, P.; Brady, M.; Taylor, J.; Gurung, A.; Maini, B. 4D Volume Intracardiac Echocardiography for Intraprocedural Guidance of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure. J. Atr. Fibrillation 2019, 12, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pommier, T.; Guenancia, C.; Sagnard, A.; Ferrand, B.; Didier, R.; Fichot, M.; Laurent, G.; Morgant, M.C.; Bouchot, O.; Lorgis, L. Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Guided by Intracardiac Echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 14, 1620–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhardwaj, B.; Lantz, G.; Golwala, H.; Chadderdon, S.; Song, H.K.; Zahr, F. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Mitral Valve Replacement Using 4D Intracardiac Echocardiogram and Conscious Sedation. Struct. Heart 2022, 6, 100046, Erratum in Struct. Heart 2023, 7, 100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2023.100158. [Google Scholar]
- Bartel, T.; Bonaros, N.; Müller, L.; Friedrich, G.; Grimm, M.; Velik-Salchner, C.; Feuchtner, G.; Pedross, F.; Müller, S. Intracardiac echocardiography: A new guiding tool for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2011, 24, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ussia, G.P.; Barbanti, M.; Sarkar, K.; Cumbo, M.; Aruta, P.; Scarabelli, M.; Cammalleri, V.; Immè, S.; Pistritto, A.M.; Gulino, S.; et al. Accuracy of intracardiac echocardiography for aortic root assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am. Heart J. 2012, 163, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen-Kudsk, J.E.; Berti, S.; Caprioglio, F.; Ronco, F.; Arzamendi, D.; Betts, T.; Tondo, C.; Christen, T.; Allocco, J. Intracardiac echocardiography to guide Watchman FLX implantation: The ICE LAA study. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023, 16, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabrera-Munoz, N.E.; Eliahoo, P.; Wodnicki, R.; Jung, H.; Chiu, C.T.; Williams, J.A.; Kim, H.H.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, G.Z.; Shung, K.K. Fabrication and Characterization of a Miniaturized 15-MHz Side-Looking Phased-Array Transducer Catheter. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2019, 66, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shlofmitz, E.; Kerndt, C.C.; Parekh, A.; Khalid, N. Intravascular ultrasound. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Munding, C.E.; Chérin, E.; Jourard, I.; Weyers, J.J.; Goertz, D.E.; Courtney, B.K.; Foster, F.S. Development of a 3 French dual-frequency intravascular ultrasound catheter. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2018, 44, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, T.; Yu, M.; Li, J.; Munding, C.E.; Chen, Z.; Fei, C.; Shung, K.K.; Zhou, Q. Multi-frequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2015, 62, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ono, M.; Kawashima, H.; Hara, H.; Gao, C.; Wang, R.; Kogame, N.; Takahashi, K.; Chichareon, P.; Modolo, R.; Tomaniak, M. Advances in IVUS/OCT and future clinical perspective of novel hybrid catheter system in coronary imaging. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Martin, K.; Dayton, P.A.; Jiang, X. A preliminary engineering design of intravascular dual-frequency transducers for contrast-enhanced acoustic angiography and molecular imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2014, 61, 870–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ma, J.; Martin, K.H.; Li, Y.; Dayton, P.A.; Shung, K.K.; Zhou, Q.; Jiang, X. Design factors of intravascular dual frequency transducers for super-harmonic contrast imaging and acoustic angiography. Phys. Med. Biol. 2015, 60, 3441–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Heath Martin, K.; Huang, W.; Dayton, P.A.; Jiang, X. Contrast Enhanced Superharmonic Imaging for Acoustic Angiography Using Reduced Form-Factor Lateral Mode Transmitters for Intravascular and Intracavity Applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2017, 64, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maresca, D.; Renaud, G.; Soest, G.; Li, X.; Zhou, Q.F.; Shung, K.K.; Jong, N.; Steen, A.F.W. Contrast-enhanced intravascular ultrasound pulse sequences for bandwidth-limited transducers. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013, 39, 706–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Martin, K.H.; Yu, M.; Ma, T.; Dayton, P.A.; Jiang, X.; Shung, K.K.; Zhou, Q. An Integrated System for Superharmonic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: Design and Intravascular Phantom Imaging Study. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 63, 1933–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wu, W.; Chung, Y.; Shih, W.Y.; Shih, W.H.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K. 80-MHz intravascular ultrasound transducer using PMN-PT free-standing film. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2011, 58, 2281–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoon, S.; Williams, J.; Kang, B.J.; Yoon, C.; Cabrera-Munoz, N.; Jeong, J.S.; Lee, S.G.; Shung, K.K.; Kim, H.H. Angled-focused 45 MHz PMN-PT single element transducer for intravascular ultrasound imaging. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 228, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, X.; Cao, W. Single-Crystal High-Frequency Intravascular Ultrasound Transducer With 40-μm Axial Resolution. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2020, 67, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, J.; Jiang, X.; Snook, K.; Rehrig, P.; Shrout, T.; Hackenberger, W.S.; Cheng, A.; Cao, P.; Lavalelle, G.; Geng, X. 5I-1 Microfabrication of piezoelectric composite ultrasound transducers (PC-MUT). In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 922–925. [Google Scholar]
- Shung, K.K. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Imaging and Blood Flow Measurements; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Steinhausen, R.; Pientschke, C.; Kern, S.; Beige, H. A8. 4-Modelling and Characterization of Piezoelectric 1–3 Fiber Composites. Proc. Sens. 2011, 2011, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Z.; Wang, N.; Li, Z.; Zhu, X.; Chen, Y.; Jian, X.; Cui, Y. Phased-array transducer for intracardiac echocardiography based on 1–3 piezocomposite. Front. Mater. 2021, 8, 663926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Ma, T.; Tian, J.; Han, P.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K. Micromachined PIN-PMN-PT crystal composite transducer for high-frequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2014, 61, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, J.R.; Jiang, X.; Cao, P.J.; Sadaka, A.; Bautista, R.; Snook, K.; Rehrig, P.W. 5C-5 High Frequency Piezo Composites Microfabricated Ultrasound Transducers for Intravascular Imaging (Invited). In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2–6 October 2006; pp. 264–268. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, X.; Lam, K.H.; Li, X.; Chen, R.; Ren, W.; Ren, X.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K. Lead-free intravascular ultrasound transducer using BZT-50BCT ceramics. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2013, 60, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Ren, X. Large piezoelectric effect in Pb-free ceramics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 257602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, T.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Shung, K.K.; Zhou, Q. (100)-Textured KNN-based thick film with enhanced piezoelectric property for intravascular ultrasound imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 173504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Lv, J.; Zhu, X.; Cui, Y.; Jian, X. Development of high frequency piezocomposite with hexagonal pillars via cold ablation process. Ultrasonics 2021, 114, 106404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, J.H.; Jeong, J.S. Development of High-Frequency (>60 MHz) Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Transducer by Using Asymmetric Electrodes for Improved Beam Profile. Sensors 2018, 18, 4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caronti, A.; Caliano, G.; Carotenuto, R.; Savoia, A.; Pappalardo, M.; Cianci, E.; Foglietti, V. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) arrays for medical imaging. Microelectron. J. 2006, 37, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabo, T.L. Chapter 5—Transducers. In Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out, 2nd ed.; Szabo, T.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 121–165. [Google Scholar]
- Guess, J.F.; Campbell, J.S. Acoustic properties of some biocompatible polymers at body temperature. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1995, 21, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Donnell, M.; Mimbs, J.; Miller, J. The relationship between collagen and ultrasonic attenuation in myocardial tissue. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1979, 65, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stephens, D.N.; Cannata, J.; Liu, R.; Zhao, J.Z.; Shung, K.K.; Nguyen, H.; Chia, R.; Dentinger, A.; Wildes, D.; Thomenius, K.E. The acoustic lens design and in vivo use of a multifunctional catheter combining intracardiac ultrasound imaging and electrophysiology sensing. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2008, 55, 602–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloomfield, P.E.; Lo, W.-J.; Lewin, P.A. Experimental study of the acoustical properties of polymers utilized to construct PVDF ultrasonic transducers and the acousto-electric properties of PVDF and P (VDF/TrFE) films. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2000, 47, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nimoh, D.; Acquah, I.; Wordui, E. Rational Design of Alternative Natural-Based Coupling Media for Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: A Review. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2025, 11, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruining, N.; Hamers, R.; Teo, T.-J.; de Feijter, P.J.; Serruys, P.W.; Roelandt, J.R. Adjustment method for mechanical Boston scientific corporation 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound catheters connected to a Clearview® console. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2004, 20, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corl, P.D. Device and System for Imaging and Blood Flow Velocity Measurement. U.S. Patent Application 13/892,108, 14 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, B.; Chan, N.Y.; Dai, J.; Shung, K.K.; Takeuchi, S.; Zhou, Q. New fabrication of high-frequency (100-MHz) ultrasound PZT film kerfless linear array [Correspondence]. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2013, 60, 854–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannata, J.M.; Williams, J.A.; Qifa, Z.; Ritter, T.A.; Shung, K.K. Development of a 35-MHz piezo-composite ultrasound array for medical imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2006, 53, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jian, X.; Han, Z.; Liu, P.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Shao, W.; Cui, Y. A High Frequency Geometric Focusing Transducer Based on 1-3 Piezocomposite for Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9327270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangaraju, P.; Varthya, S.B. ISO 10993: Biological evaluation of medical devices. In Medical Device Guidelines and Regulations Handbook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 163–187. [Google Scholar]
- Busch, J.D.; Schröder, H.; Sellenschloh, K.; Adam, G.; Ittrich, H.; Huber, G. Test method for mechanical properties of implantable catheters according to DIN 10555-3. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 82, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gulino, M.-S.; Bruzzi, M.; Vangi, D. Gas-coupled laser acoustic detection technique for NDT of mechanical components. Ultrasonics 2021, 114, 106415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basaeri, H.; Christensen, D.B.; Roundy, S. A review of acoustic power transfer for bio-medical implants. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran-Huu-Hue, L.; Desmare, R.; Lavassort, F.; Lethiecq, M. KLM circuit-based method for modeling multilayer piezoelectric structures. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No. 97CH36118); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 995–998. [Google Scholar]
- Desilets, C.S.; Fraser, J.D.; Kino, G.S. The design of efficient broad-band piezoelectric transducers. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 2005, 25, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inoue, T.; Ohta, M.; Takahashi, S. Design of ultrasonic transducers with multiple acoustic matching layers for medical application. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1987, 34, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, G.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, J.; Xi, S. Design of a Cylindrical Megahertz Miniature Ultrasonic Welding Oscillator. Sensors 2025, 18, 5922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henneberg, J.; Gerlach, A.; Storck, H.; Cebulla, H.; Marburg, S. Reducing mechanical cross-coupling in phased array transducers using stop band material as backing. J. Sound Vib. 2018, 424, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayter, S. Transmission line modelling for array transducer elements. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 791–794. [Google Scholar]
- Arakawa, T.; Tateishi, Y. Ceramic-Based Acoustic Matching Layer Material, Production Method Therefor, and Use Therefor. Available online: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=&ND=5&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20231005&CC=JP&NR=WO2023190097A1&KC=A1 (accessed on 23 March 2026).
- Zhou, Q.; Cha, J.H.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Cao, W.; Shung, K.K. Alumina/epoxy nanocomposite matching layers for high-frequency ultrasound transducer application. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2009, 56, 213–219. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; An, X.; Guo, S.; Gong, X.; Ke, Q. Design and Fabrication of Annular-Array Ultrasound Transducer Based (K, Na) NbO 3 Lead-Free 1–3 Piezoelectric Composite. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2023, 71, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Jang, J.; Chang, J.H. Oblong-shaped-focused transducers for intravascular ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 64, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quan, Y.; Yang, X.; Fei, C.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Sun, X.; Chen, Q.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y. PZN-PT single crystal based high-frequency intravascular ultrasound transducers. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 51820–51825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, J.A.; Sharma, S.; Leadbetter, J.; Cochran, S.; Adamson, R. Mass-spring matching layers for high-frequency ultrasound transducers: A new technique using vacuum deposition. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2014, 61, 1911–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, T.; Jung, J.; Lee, S.-M.; Park, J.; Park, J.-H.; Paik, K.-W.; Lee, H.J. FPCB as an acoustic matching layer for 1D linear ultrasound transducer arrays. Sensors 2022, 22, 5557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, C.; Li, Z.; Fei, C.; Wei, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Quan, Y.; Yang, Y. Optimal design of ultrasonic transducer based on multi-layer backing with adjustable impedance. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 51693–51700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, J.N., Jr. A Study of Ultrasonic Attenuation and Wave Propagation in Solids; The Pennsylvania State University: University Park, PA, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Grewe, M.G.; Gururaja, T.; Shrout, T.R.; Newnham, R.E. Acoustic properties of particle/polymer composites for ultrasonic transducer backing applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2002, 37, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Yoo, J.; Heo, D.; Seo, Y.-S.; Lim, H.G.; Kim, H.H. High-attenuation backing layer for miniaturized ultrasound imaging transducer. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2022, 69, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, W.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Yu, Y.; Cheng, W.F.; Tsang, F.K.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K.; Dai, J.; Sun, L. An open system for intravascular ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2012, 59, 2201–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Moon, J.Y.; Chang, J.H. A 35 MHz/105 MHz Dual-Element Focused Transducer for Intravascular Ultrasound Tissue Imaging Using the Third Harmonic. Sensors 2018, 18, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Peng, C. A Backing-Layer-Shared Miniature Dual-Frequency Ultrasound Probe for Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Validations. Biosensors 2023, 13, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.C.; Yin, J.; Hu, C.; Cannata, J.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Shung, K.K. A dual-modality probe utilizing intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography for intravascular imaging applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2010, 57, 2839–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Chang, J.H. A 40-MHz Ultrasound Transducer with an Angled Aperture for Guiding Percutaneous Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusion: A Feasibility Study. Sensors 2018, 18, 4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Qin, H.; Peng, C. High-Frequency 64-Element Ring-Annular Array Transducer: Development and Preclinical Validation for Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging. Biosensors 2025, 15, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kilroy, J.P.; Patil, A.V.; Rychak, J.J.; Hossack, J.A. An IVUS transducer for microbubble therapies. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2014, 61, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cabrera-Munoz, N.E.; Eliahoo, P.; Wodnicki, R.; Jung, H.; Chiu, C.T.; Williams, J.A.; Kim, H.H.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K. Forward-looking 30-MHz phased-array transducer for peripheral intravascular imaging. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 2018, 280, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Santos, D.S.; Ossenkoppele, B.; Hopf, Y.M.; Soozande, M.; Noothout, E.; Vos, H.J.; Bosch, J.G.; Pertijs, M.A.; Verweij, M.D.; de Jong, N. An ultrasound matrix transducer for high-frame-rate 3-D intra-cardiac echocardiography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2024, 50, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shung, K.K.; Zippuro, M. Ultrasonic transducers and arrays. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 1996, 15, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Raghunathan, S.B.; Yu, Z.; Shabanimotlagh, M.; Chen, Z.; Chang, Z.-y.; Blaak, S.; Prins, C.; Ponte, J.; Noothout, E. A prototype PZT matrix transducer with low-power integrated receive ASIC for 3-D transesophageal echocardiography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2015, 63, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, E.; Ding, Q.; Shabanimotlagh, M.; Kruizinga, P.; Chang, Z.-Y.; Noothout, E.; Vos, H.J.; Bosch, J.G.; Verweij, M.D.; de Jong, N. A Reconfigurable Ultrasound Transceiver ASIC With $24\times40 $ Elements for 3-D Carotid Artery Imaging. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2018, 53, 2065–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Chen, Z.; Bera, D.; Raghunathan, S.B.; Shabanimotlagh, M.; Noothout, E.; Chang, Z.-Y.; Ponte, J.; Prins, C.; Vos, H.J. A front-end ASIC with receive sub-array beamforming integrated with a 32 × 32 PZT matrix transducer for 3-D transesophageal echocardiography. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2017, 52, 994–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKeighen, R. Design guidelines for medical ultrasonic arrays. In Medical Imaging 1998: Ultrasonic Transducer Engineering; SPIE Int.: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, R.; Cabrera-Munoz, N.E.; Lam, K.H.; Hsu, H.S.; Zheng, F.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K. PMN-PT single-crystal high-frequency kerfless phased array. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2014, 61, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannata, J.; Williams, J.; Shung, K. A kerfless 30 MHz linear ultrasonic array. In Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 109–112. [Google Scholar]
- Démoré, C.E.; Brown, J.A.; Lockwood, G.R. Investigation of cross talk in kerfless annular arrays for high-frequency imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2006, 53, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huff, M. Recent advances in reactive ion etching and applications of high-aspect-ratio microfabrication. Micromachines 2021, 12, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Ma, L.; Li, X.; Tang, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, S. A novel synchronous micro motor for intravascular ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 66, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newnham, R.E.; Skinner, D.P.; Cross, L.E. Connectivity and piezoelectric-pyroelectric composites. Mater. Res. Bull. 1978, 13, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, W.A.; Auld, B.A. Modeling 1-3 composite piezoelectrics: Thickness-mode oscillations. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1991, 38, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boujenoui, A.; El Atlas, N.; Bybi, A.; Reskal, H.; Elmaimouni, L. Advances in Crosstalk Reduction Techniques for Ultrasonic Transducer Arrays. Sensors 2025, 25, 7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Djuth, F.T.; Zhou, Q.; Shung, K.K. Micromachining techniques in developing high-frequency piezoelectric composite ultrasonic array transducers. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2013, 60, 2615–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Li, S. Micromachined Piezoelectric Material and Dual-Layer Transducers for Ultrasound Imaging; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bartel, T.; Müller, S.; Biviano, A.; Hahn, R.T. Why is intracardiac echocardiography helpful? Benefits, costs, and how to learn. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baruś, P.; Modrzewski, J.; Gumiężna, K.; Dunaj, P.; Głód, M.; Bednarek, A.; Wańha, W.; Roleder, T.; Kochman, J.; Tomaniak, M. Comparative Appraisal of Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography in Invasive Coronary Imaging: 2022 Update. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, D.Y.; An, S.; Jolly, N.; Attanasio, S.; Yadav, N.; Gutierrez, J.A.; Nanna, M.G.; Rao, S.V.; Vij, A. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023, 102, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X. CMOS Multimodal Sensor Based Lab-on-a-Chip System for Personalized Bio-Imaging Diagnosis. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Wan, H.; Jiang, X.; Peng, C. Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer Technology: Recent Advances and Applications. Biosensors 2023, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abaravičius, B. Development of Electronics for Microultrasound Capsule Endoscopy. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hahn, R.T.; Mahmood, F.; Kodali, S.; Lang, R.; Monaghan, M.; Gillam, L.D.; Swaminathan, M.; Bonow, R.O.; Bardeleben, R.S.; Bax, J.J.; et al. Core Competencies in Echocardiography for Imaging Structural Heart Disease Interventions: An Expert Consensus Statement. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 12, 2560–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kodeboina, M.; Piayda, K.; Jenniskens, I.; Vyas, P.; Chen, S.; Pesigan, R.J.; Ferko, N.; Patel, B.P.; Dobrin, A.; Habib, J.; et al. Challenges and Burdens in the Coronary Artery Disease Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5633. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Wiegers, S.E.; Ryan, T.; Arrighi, J.A.; Brown, S.M.; Canaday, B.; Damp, J.B.; Diaz-Gomez, J.L.; Figueredo, V.M.; Garcia, M.J.; Gillam, L.D. 2019 ACC/AHA/ASE Advanced Training Statement on Echocardiography (Revision of the 2003 ACC/AHA Clinical Competence Statement on Echocardiography): A Report of the ACC Competency Management Committee. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 12, e000026. [Google Scholar]
- Alberti, A.; Giudice, P.; Gelera, A.; Stefanini, L.; Priest, V.; Simmonds, M.; Lee, C.; Wasserman, M. Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Eur. J. Health Econ. 2016, 17, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLoughlin, D. Development of an Automated Catheter Production Line with SCADA Integration for the Medical Device Industry. Bachelor’s Thesis, Technological Uninersity of The Shannon, Athlone, Ireland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, Z.Y. Research on the Financial Impact of Centralized Procurement of Medical Consumables on Public Hospitals. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2025, 13, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrescu, A.; D’HOoge, J.; Voigt, J. Concepts and applications of ultrafast cardiac ultrasound imaging. Echocardiography 2021, 38, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathod, K.S.; Hamshere, S.M.; A Jones, D.; Mathur, A. Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging—Apples and Oranges? Interv. Cardiol. 2015, 10, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Han, W.; Wang, S.; Jia, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, B. Advantages of hybrid intravascular ultrasound-optical coherence tomography system in clinical practice. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2025, 12, 1595889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, H.; Feng, X.X.; Guo, Q.Y.; Zhou, Y.J. Updates of developments in interventional therapy for elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2024, 21, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsigkas, G.; Nastouli, K.M.; Apostolos, A.; Spyropoulou, P.; Bozika, M.; Papafaklis, M.; Rouzi, S.; Tsimara, E.; Karanasos, A.; Mplani, V.; et al. When Functional Assessment Meets Intravascular Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zheng, Z.; Chan, J.; Yeow, J.T.W. Capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers for intravascular ultrasound imaging. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2020, 6, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Ref. | Material Class | Center Frequency (MHz) | Bandwidth (%) | Axial Resolution (μm) | Lateral Resolution (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [14] | PZT Ceramic | 6.2 | 61 | Not reported | Not reported |
| [15] | PZT Ceramic | 5.6 | 60 | Not reported | Not reported |
| [33] | PMN-PT Single crystal | 82 | 65 | 35 | 176 |
| [34] | PMN-PT Single crystal | 47 | 72 | 25 | 120 |
| [35] | PMN-PT Single crystal | 46.8 | 67.2 | 40 | 210 |
| [39] | 1–3 Composite | 9 | 55 | 108.5 | 317 |
| [40] | 1–3 PIN-PMN-PT | 41 | 86 | 43 | 226 |
| [45] | 1–3 PZT Composite | 51.2 | 68.8 | 22 | Not reported |
| [41] | 1–3 PMN-PT | 41 | 77 | Not reported | Not reported |
| [42] | BZT-50BCT Lead-free | 30.5 | 53 | Not reported | Not reported |
| [44] | KNN Lead-free | 52 | 61.5 | Not reported | Not reported |
| [29] | PMN-PT Single crystal | 35 | 47.7 | 46.0 | 231.5 |
| [29] | PMN-PT Single crystal | 90 | 42.0 | 21.5 | 123.5 |
| [29] | LiNbO3 Single crystal | 120 | 24.1 | 25.7 | 105.3 |
| [29] | LiNbO3 Single crystal | 150 | 28.1 | 17.2 | 87.3 |
| [46] | PMN-32%PT | 60.2 | 57.2 | 24.8 | 156.1 |
| Ref. | Materials | Density ρ (g/cm3) | Longitudinal Velocity Vl (m/s) | Acoustic Impedance Z (MRayl) | Attenuation Coefficient α (dB/cm@1 MHz) | Frequency Exponent β | Test Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological Tissues | |||||||
| [50] | Cardiac Muscle | 1.06 | 1595 | 1.69 | 0.52 | — | 37 °C |
| [50] | Blood | 1.06 | 1590 | 1.68 | 0.16 | — | 37 °C |
| Polyether Block Amide (PEBA) Copolymers | |||||||
| [49] | Pebax 2533 (25D) | 1.01 | 1520 | 1.54 | 1.12 | 1.40 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pebax 3533 (35D) | 1.01 | 1529 | 1.55 | 1.54 | 1.28 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pebax 4033 (40D) | 1.01 | 1657 | 1.67 | 2.67 | 1.21 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pebax 5533 (55D) | 1.01 | 1751 | 1.77 | 3.41 | 1.24 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pebax 6333 (63D) | 1.01 | 1881 | 1.90 | 3.35 | 1.27 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pebax 7033 (70D) | 1.01 | 1993 | 2.01 | 2.39 | 1.25 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| Aromatic Polyurethanes | |||||||
| [49] | Pellethane 2363 (80A) | 1.13 | 1648 | 1.86 | 6.23 | 1.19 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pellethane 2363 (90A) | 1.14 | 1779 | 2.03 | 8.60 | 1.05 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Pellethane 2363 (75D) | 1.21 | 1955 | 2.37 | 4.36 | 1.15 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| Aliphatic Polyurethanes | |||||||
| [49] | Tecoflex (80A) | 1.04 | 1524 | 1.59 | 1.73 | 1.47 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| [49] | Tecoflex (65D) | 1.10 | 1951 | 2.15 | 4.58 | 1.17 | 37 °C, pulse-echo |
| Two-Part Thermoset Polyurethanes | |||||||
| [51] | RP 6400 | 1.04 | 1480 (37 °C)/1540 (25 °C) | 1.54 | 10 | ~1.0 † | 37 °C or 25 °C, method not specified |
| [51] | Bacon 430 | 1.10 | 1746 (37 °C)/1870 (25 °C) | 1.92 | 7.7 | ~1.0 † | 37 °C or 25 °C, method not specified |
| [51] | Santoprene | 0.97 | 1474 (37 °C)/1535 (25 °C) | 1.43 | 5 | ~1.0 † | 37 °C or 25 °C, method not specified |
| Other Polymers | |||||||
| [52] | TPX (Polymethylpentene) | 0.83 | 2190 | 1.82 | 1.2 | — | Temperature not specified |
| Ref. | Matching Strategy | 1st Layer Z (MRayl) | 2nd Layer Z (MRayl) | Center Frequency (MHz) | Insertion Loss (dB) | −6 dB Bandwidth (%) | Fabrication Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [42] | Ag-epoxy + Parylene | ~7.33 | ~2.59 | 30.5 | 18.7 (measured) | 53 | Low |
| [14,15] | Metal-filled Graphite + ABS | ~6.6 | ~2.2 | ~6 | Not reported | 60–61 | Low |
| [71] | Ag-epoxy + Parylene | 7.33 | 2.59 | 50.84 | Not reported | 68.48% | Medium |
| [72] | Single-layer E-solder | 5.9 | None | 43.5 | Not reported | 62.3 | Low |
| [73] | Parylene only (>100 MHz) | 2.59 | None | 120 | Not reported | 24.1 | Low |
| [26] | Mass-Spring +Parylene C | Variable | Variable | 47 | −21.9 | 46 | Very High |
| [75] | FPC-based | Variable (Cu/PI) | Variable | Variable | Not reported | — | Medium |
| Device Type | Catheter OD (Fr) | Channel Count | Cable Strategy | Center Frequency (MHz) | Cable Loss @ Freq | Key Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4D ICE Motor-Driven [14] | 10 | N/A (Motor) | Motor/Coaxial | 5–10 | Not critical (low frequency) | Motor reliability/Hermeticity |
| 4D ICE Phased Array [15] | 10 | 64–128 | ASIC-integrated | 5–10 | Eliminated (on-chip) | ASIC heat dissipation (37 °C limit) |
| Standard ICE (Commercial) | 6–10 | 32–64 | Standard micro-coax | 5–10 | Low (<0.5 dB) | Standard design |
| IVUS Mechanical [23] | 3–6 | N/A (Motor) | Motor/Coaxial | 20–60 | ~0.61 dB/m @ 35 MHz | NURD/Off-axis errors |
| IVUS Phased Array [11] | 3.5–9 | 32–64 | Micro-coax bundle | 20–60 | Critical (>1 dB @ 60 MHz) | Element isolation/Crosstalk |
| IVUS Dual Frequency [29] | 3–6 | 2 (Back-to-back) | Shared backing | 35/90 | Critical (impedance mismatch) | Signal isolation between frequencies |
| IVUS Forward-Looking [87] | 8 | 32 | Micro-coax bundle | 30 | Moderate | Fabrication complexity |
| IVUS Phased Array [56] | 3.5–9 | 32–64 | Micro-coax | 35 | 0.61 dB/m @ 35 MHz | Cable loading at high frequency |
| 4D ICE Phased Array [88] | 10 | 1024 (32 × 32) | ASIC-integrated | 5–10 | Eliminated (ASIC) | ASIC thermal management |
| IVUS Dual Frequency [25] | 3 | 2 (Dual-freq) | Shared backing | 35/90 | Minimized (short distance) | Miniaturization limit |
| The Dimension of Comparison | Imaging Scenario | Resolution Ratio | Real-Time | Operating Risk | Core Clinical Value | Limitations | Single Operation Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICE | Intracardiac structures (atrium, valves, endocardium) | High (intracardiac structure, 10–50 μm) | Real-time (30–60 frames/s, 4D ICE supports dynamic reconstruction) | Low (via vascular intervention, no radiation, no general anesthesia required) | Real-time intracardiac intervention positioning (e.g., release of a stent) | Field of view is limited (only in the cardiac cavity) | Higher (the catheter is disposable, about 10,000–20,000 CNY) |
| IVUS | Intravascular structures (coronary wall, plaque, stent) | Extremely high (microstructure of blood vessel wall, 5–20 μm) | Real-time (15–30 frames/s, pullback imaging) | Low (via coronary intervention, no radiation) | Coronary intervention plaque/stent assessment | Field of view limitation (only in the vascular lumen, near field blind area) | Higher (the catheter is disposable, about 8000–15,000 CNY) |
| TTE/TEE | Whole heart structure (trans-thoracic/trans-esophageal) | Central overall structure (100–500 μm) | Real-time (20–30 frames/s) | TEE requires general anesthesia (risk of esophageal injury) | Preoperative structure evaluation and postoperative efficacy follow-up | TTE is interfered by lung gas/obesity, and TEE cannot be used in operation | Low (device reuse, about 10,000–30,000 CNY) |
| CT/MRI | Preoperative anatomical evaluation (vascular and cardiac morphology | High (three-dimensional anatomy, 50–200 μm) | Non-real-time (needs to be reconstructed later) | Exposure to radiation (CT), requires contrast agent (kidney injury risk) | Preoperative complex structural anatomy planning | Unable to guide intervention in real time | Medium (CT about 3000–5000 CNY, MRI about 8000 CNY) |
| CAG | Assessment of lumen stenosis | Low (shows the filling range of contrast agent) | Real-time (contrast flow observation) | Radiation/contrast agent allergy | Preliminary judgment of coronary stenosis | It is impossible to assess the nature of the vascular wall and plaque | Medium (about 5000–8000 CNY) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
He, D.; Ye, B. Functional Materials for ICE and IVUS Piezoelectric Transducers: A Review. Sensors 2026, 26, 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072143
He D, Ye B. Functional Materials for ICE and IVUS Piezoelectric Transducers: A Review. Sensors. 2026; 26(7):2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072143
Chicago/Turabian StyleHe, Dayong, and Baihezi Ye. 2026. "Functional Materials for ICE and IVUS Piezoelectric Transducers: A Review" Sensors 26, no. 7: 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072143
APA StyleHe, D., & Ye, B. (2026). Functional Materials for ICE and IVUS Piezoelectric Transducers: A Review. Sensors, 26(7), 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072143

