Flatland Metasurfaces for Optical Gas Sensing
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Physical Framework of Gas MS Interaction
3. Absorption and Spectroscopy-Based MS Gas Sensing
4. Refractive Index and Resonance Shift Sensing Mechanisms
5. Loss Damping and Amplitude Modulation-Based Detection
6. Material-Mediated and Chemo-Optical Flatland Sensors
7. Polarization Wavefront and Visual Readout Sensors
8. Spectral Regimes and Operational Wavelengths
9. MS Architectures and Design Strategies
10. System-Level Integration and Applications
11. Challenges Outlook and Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Butt, M.A.; Voronkov, G.S.; Grakhova, E.P.; Kutluyarov, R.V.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N. Environmental Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review on Optical Waveguide and Fiber-Based Sensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dell’Olio, F.; Angulo Barrios, C. On-Chip Biosensing and Gas Sensing by Photonic Slot Waveguides: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2025, 25, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kidanemariam, A.; Cho, S. Advanced Metal–Organic Framework-Based Sensor Systems for Gas and Environmental Monitoring: From Material Design to Embedded Applications. Sensors 2025, 25, 6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alberti, S.; Datta, A.; Jágerská, J. Integrated Nanophotonic Waveguide-Based Devices for IR and Raman Gas Spectroscopy. Sensors 2021, 21, 7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awad, H.; Hasan, I.; Mnaymneh, K.; Hall, T.J.; Andonovic, I. Gas Sensing Using Slow Light in Photonic Crystal Waveguides. In Proceedings of the 2011 7th International Workshop on Fibre and Optical Passive Components; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Bamiedakis, N.; Hutter, T.; Penty, R.V.; White, I.H.; Elliott, S.R. PCB-Integrated Optical Waveguide Sensors: An Ammonia Gas Sensor. J. Light. Technol. 2013, 31, 1628–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Butt, M.A.; Kaźmierczak, A.; Piramidowicz, R. Plasmonic Sensor Based on Metal-Insulator-Metal Waveguide Square Ring Cavity Filled with Functional Material for the Detection of CO2 Gas. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 16584–16594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Q. Multi-Component Gas Sensing Based on Slotted Photonic Crystal Waveguide with Liquid Infiltration. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 184, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Sun, H.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Ma, Y. Highly Sensitive CH4-TDLAS Sensor Based on 3D-Printed Multi-Pass Cell. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2024, 141, 105484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijesinghe, D.R.; Zobair, M.A.; Esmaeelpour, M. A Review on Photoacoustic Spectroscopy Techniques for Gas Sensing. Sensors 2024, 24, 6577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranwal, J.; Barse, B.; Gatto, G.; Broncova, G.; Kumar, A. Electrochemical Sensors and Their Applications: A Review. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafi, P.; Ghaemi, A. Chemiresistor Gas Sensors: Design, Challenges, and Strategies: A Comprehensive Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 498, 154999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tierney, M.J.; Kim, H.O.L. Electrochemical Gas Sensor with Extremely Fast Response Times. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 3435–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, G.; Xiao, S. A Review on H2 Sensors Based on FET. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2024, 52, 100401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Guo, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Xia, Y.; Duan, Z.; Hou, M.; Yang, L.; Gao, L.; Tai, H. Advances in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Sensors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2026, 546, 217087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stehrer, B.P.; Schwödiauer, R.; Bauer, S.; Graz, I.M.; Pollheimer, P.D.; Gruber, H.J. High Frequency QCM Based Sensor System for Sensitive Detection of Dissolved Analytes. Procedia Eng. 2010, 5, 835–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaraj, S.G.; Alrebh, A.; Elamaran, D.; Zhou, H.; Huang, K.; Almansoori, M.; Yamahara, H.; Tabata, H. Surface Acoustic Wave Gas Sensors: Recent Developments and Their Role in Sensing Technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2025, 317, 118157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N. Metasurfaces and Several Well-Studied Applications. In Photonics Elements for Sensing and Optical Conversions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Agrahari, R.; Dwivedi, S.; Jain, P.K.; Mahto, M. High Sensitive Metasurface Absorber for Refractive Index Sensing. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2023, 22, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, M.A. Ultra-Sensitive Refractive Index Sensing Enabled by High-Q Hybrid Plasmonic Metasurface Absorbers. Opt. Laser Technol. 2025, 192, 113743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, H. Temperature Tunable Narrow-Band Terahertz Metasurface Absorber Based on InSb Micro-Cylinder Arrays for Enhanced Sensing Application. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 82981–82988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdollahramezani, S.; Hemmatyar, O.; Taghinejad, M.; Taghinejad, H.; Kiarashinejad, Y.; Zandehshahvar, M.; Fan, T.; Deshmukh, S.; Eftekhar, A.A.; Cai, W.; et al. Dynamic Hybrid Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 1238–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, C.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Qin, Y.; Zhou, Y. Phase and Amplitude Simultaneously Coding Metasurface with Multi-Frequency and Multifunctional Electromagnetic Modulations. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-T.; Taylor, A.J.; Yu, N. A Review of Metasurfaces: Physics and Applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 076401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khonina, S.N.; Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L. A Review on Reconfigurable Metalenses Revolutionizing Flat Optics. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2302794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Gu, J.; Li, Y.; Tian, Z.; Singh, R.; Zhang, S.; Han, J.; Zhang, W. Broadband Metasurface Holograms: Toward Complete Phase and Amplitude Engineering. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, C.; Sun, P.; Gao, P.; Li, W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, Q.; Yun, M. High Q All-Dielectric Metasurface Sensor for Seawater Salinity and Temperature Simultaneous Measurements. Opt. Commun. 2024, 555, 130236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azimi, A.; Barrier, J.; Barreda, A.; Bauer, T.; Bouzari, F.; Brokkelkamp, A.; Buatier de Mongeot, F.; Parsons, T.; Christianen, P.; Conesa-Boj, S.; et al. Photonics in Flatland: Challenges and Opportunities for Nanophotonics with 2D Semiconductors. npj Nanophoton. 2025, 2, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, W. Molecules in Flatland. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 448–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lohmann, A.W.; Pe’er, A.; Wang, D.; Friesem, A.A. Flatland Optics: Fundamentals. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2000, 17, 1755–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez-Diaz, J.S.; Alù, A. Flatland Optics with Hyperbolic Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 2211–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moccia, M.; Castaldi, G.; Alù, A.; Galdi, V. Exploring Interface Effects in Flatland Optics. In Proceedings of the 2023 Seventeenth International Congress on Artificial Materials for Novel Wave Phenomena (Metamaterials); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. X-114–X-116. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, J.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, J. Near-Field Optics on Flatland: From Noble Metals to van Der Waals Materials. Adv. Phys. X 2019, 4, 1593051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar Sharma, P.; Ruotolo, A.; Khan, R.; Mishra, Y.K.; Kumar Kaushik, N.; Kim, N.-Y.; Kumar Kaushik, A. Perspectives on 2D-Borophene Flatland for Smart Bio-Sensing. Mater. Lett. 2022, 308, 131089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.-Y.; Argyropoulos, C.; Farhat, M.; Gomez-Diaz, J.S. Flatland Plasmonics and Nanophotonics Based on Graphene and Beyond. Nanophotonics 2017, 6, 1239–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Yang, X.; Guo, X.; Khaliji, K.; Biswas, S.R.; García de Abajo, F.J.; Low, T.; Sun, Z.; Dai, Q. Gas Identification with Graphene Plasmons. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Singh, H.K.; Kumar, B.; Kumar, S. First-Principles Investigation of Stanene-Based Toxic Gas Sensors: Coupled Electrical and Optical Sensitivities. Solid State Commun. 2025, 404, 116079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N.; Voronkov, G.S.; Grakhova, E.P.; Kutluyarov, R.V. A Review on Photonic Sensing Technologies: Status and Outlook. Biosensors 2023, 13, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, Y.; Zhong, H.; Long, Z.; Cao, H.; Jin, X. From Performance to Structure: A Comprehensive Survey of Advanced Metasurface Design for next-Generation Imaging. npj Nanophoton. 2025, 2, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhowmik, T.; Chowdhary, A.K.; Sikdar, D. Polarization- and Angle-Insensitive Tunable Metasurface for Electro-Optic Modulation. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2023, 35, 879–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Song, P.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Gong, Z. Dynamic Control of Bidirectional Terahertz Wavefront Based on Thermally Active Metasurfaces. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2025, 191, 108992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Balendhran, S.; Sabri, Y.; Bhargava, S.K.; Crozier, K.B. Smart Mid-Infrared Metasurface Microspectrometer Gas Sensing System. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2024, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Sanchis, J.A.; Vidal, B.; Díaz-Rubio, A. Huygens Metasurface Supporting Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum for Terahertz Gas Sensing. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 14504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, W.; Zhou, R.; Du, Z.; Ling, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Shao, J.; Luo, S.; Chen, D. A Dual-Band Carbon Dioxide Sensor Based on Metal–TiO2–Metal Metasurface Covered by Functional Material. Photonics 2022, 9, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazanskiy, N.L.; Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N. Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensor Based on Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Polymer Deposited on Silicon Nano-Cylinders Metasurface. Sensors 2021, 21, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fite, G.M.; Maremi, F.T.; Gemta, A.B.; Beyene, G.; Birara, M. Highly Selective and Efficient Gas Sensor Based on a Narrow-Band IR Metamaterial Absorber Using Numerical Simulation. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwanaga, M. Rapid Detection of Attomolar SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acids in All-Dielectric Metasurface Biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tashiro, M.; Ide, K.; Asano, K.; Ishii, S.; Sugiura, Y.; Uchiyama, A.; Wakatsuchi, H. Metasurface-Enabled Multifunctional Single-Frequency Sensors without External Power. NPG Asia Mater. 2024, 16, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, J.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, X.; Li, B.; Shi, Y.; Tsai, D.P.; Liu, A.Q.; Huang, W.; Zhu, W. Metasurface Micro/Nano-Optical Sensors: Principles and Applications. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 11598–11618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, F.; Zhuang, M.; Yan, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Dong, Z.; Ma, W.; Zhu, J. Meta-Attention Deep Learning for Smart Development of Metasurface Sensors. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2405750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N.; Butt, M.A. Recent Development in Metasurfaces: A Focus on Sensing Applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Singh, H.; Singh, D.K. Metasurfaces in Optical Biosensing: Revolutionizing Detection Techniques and Shaping the Future. Photonics 2025, 12, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y. Low-Loss Metasurfaces Based on Discretized Meta-Atoms. Commun. Phys. 2024, 7, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, W.; Chen, J.; Wu, R. A Generative Meta-Atom Model for Metasurface-Based Absorber Designs. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2201959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Li, B.; Zeng, L.; Zhong, G.; Ma, Z.; Fan, Y.; Xu, H.; Shao, Z. Dynamically Tunable Bound States in the Continuum Metasurfaces with Simultaneous Ultrahigh-Q and Multi-Resonance Tunability. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025, 27, 20934–20943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, F.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, K. High-Sensitivity Multi-Gas Detection Using Dual-Ridge Metasurface Emitters with Polarization-Distinguishable Emission Spectra. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 41244–41254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, K.; Ma, T. Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensor Based on Terahertz Metasurface with Asymmetric Cross-Shaped Holes Empowered by Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum. Sensors 2025, 25, 4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, C.; Liu, H. Design of Tunable Dual-Gas Sensor Based on Phase Transition of VO2 in Metasurface. In Proceedings of the 13th International Photonics and OptoElectronics Meetings (POEM 2021); SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2022; Volume 12154, pp. 231–235. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, P.; Li, T.; He, Q. Bidirectional UV Metasurface: Achieving Switchable Perfect Absorption for Gas/Biosensing and Optical Shielding. Opt. Commun. 2025, 596, 132475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, S.; Suh, W.; Joannopoulos, J.D. Temporal Coupled-Mode Theory for the Fano Resonance in Optical Resonators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2003, 20, 569–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miroshnichenko, A.E.; Flach, S.; Kivshar, Y.S. Fano Resonances in Nanoscale Structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 2257–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, R.; Needham, J.A.; Lesanovsky, I.; Intravaia, F.; Olmos, B. Modified Dipole-Dipole Interaction and Dissipation in an Atomic Ensemble near Surfaces. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 053841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homola, J. Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Detection of Chemical and Biological Species. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 462–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Carlo, M.; De Leonardis, F.; Soref, R.A.; Colatorti, L.; Passaro, V.M.N. Non-Hermitian Sensing in Photonics and Electronics: A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 3977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Yuan, X.; Huang, Y.; Xiong, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.-X. Dual-Polarization and Dual-Band Quasi-BIC Metasurface for Tunable Absorption and High-Sensitivity Sensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2025, 14, 2501–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, E.; Mansouri-Birjandi, M.A.; Tavousi, A. High-Performance Plasmonic Metasurface Sensor by Triangular Nano-Structures. Opt. Contin. 2024, 3, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, M.A. A Perspective on Plasmonic Metasurfaces: Unlocking New Horizons for Sensing Applications. Nanotechnology 2025, 36, 182501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qin, F.; Ding, L.; Zhang, L.; Monticone, F.; Chum, C.C.; Deng, J.; Mei, S.; Li, Y.; Teng, J.; Hong, M.; et al. Hybrid Bilayer Plasmonic Metasurface Efficiently Manipulates Visible Light. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Hao, Z.; DiMarco, C.; Maturavongsadit, P.; Hao, Y.; Lu, M.; Stein, A.; Wang, Q.; Hone, J.; et al. Optical Conductivity-Based Ultrasensitive Mid-Infrared Biosensing on a Hybrid Metasurface. Light. Sci. Appl. 2018, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abujetas, D.R.; Sáenz, J.J.; Sánchez-Gil, J.A. Narrow Fano Resonances in Si Nanocylinder Metasurfaces: Refractive Index Sensing. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 183103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, B.; Wu, B.; Zhang, H.; Tang, S. Simultaneous Measurements of Refractive Index and Methane Concentration through Electromagnetic Fano Resonance Coupling in All-Dielectric Metasurface. Sensors 2021, 21, 3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conteduca, D.; Arruda, G.S.; Barth, I.; Wang, Y.; Krauss, T.F.; Martins, E.R. Beyond Q: The Importance of the Resonance Amplitude for Photonic Sensors. ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 1757–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.; Kim, W.-S.; Kim, K.; Ansari, M.A.; Mehmood, M.Q.; Badloe, T.; Kim, Y.; Gwak, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, Y.-K.; et al. Holographic Metasurface Gas Sensors for Instantaneous Visual Alarms. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabe9943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Seong, J.; Choi, M.; Park, J.; Kim, G.; Kim, H.; Jeong, J.; Jung, C.; Kim, J.; Jeon, G.; et al. Integrated Metasurfaces for Re-Envisioning a near-Future Disruptive Optical Platform. Light. Sci. Appl. 2023, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rifat, A.A.; Rahmani, M.; Xu, L.; Miroshnichenko, A.E. Hybrid Metasurface Based Tunable Near-Perfect Absorber and Plasmonic Sensor. Materials 2018, 11, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Francescantonio, A.; Sabatti, A.; Weigand, H.; Bailly-Rioufreyt, E.; Vincenti, M.A.; Carletti, L.; Kellner, J.; Zilli, A.; Finazzi, M.; Celebrano, M.; et al. Efficient GHz Electro-Optical Modulation with a Nonlocal Lithium Niobate Metasurface in the Linear and Nonlinear Regime. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 7000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, W.; Fröch, J.E.; Cheng, K.; Pi, D.; Li, B.; Majumdar, A.; Maier, S.A.; Ren, H.; Gu, M.; Fang, X. Ultranarrow-Linewidth Wavelength-Vortex Metasurface Holography. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadt9159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bosomtwi, D.; Babicheva, V.E. Beyond Conventional Sensing: Hybrid Plasmonic Metasurfaces and Bound States in the Continuum. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Butt, M.A.; Kazansky, N.L. Narrowband Perfect Metasurface Absorber Based on Impedance Matching. Photonics Lett. Pol. 2020, 12, 88–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Pietila, J.; Singh, H.J.; Caglayan, H. Phase-Shifting Structured Illumination with a Polarization-Encoded Metasurface. Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 11696–11702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholipour, B.; Karvounis, A.; Yin, J.; Soci, C.; MacDonald, K.F.; Zheludev, N.I. Phase-Change-Driven Dielectric-Plasmonic Transitions in Chalcogenide Metasurfaces. NPG Asia Mater. 2018, 10, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allayarov, I.; Evlyukhin, A.B.; Roth, D.J.; Chichkov, B.; Zayats, A.V.; Calà Lesina, A. Dynamic Nonlocal Dielectric Metasurfaces: Tuning Collective Lattice Resonances via Substrate–Superstrate Permittivity Contrast. Adv. Photonics Res. 2024, 5, 2300268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allayarov, I.; Aita, V.; Roth, D.J.; van Casteren, B.; Bykov, A.Y.; Evlyukhin, A.B.; Zayats, A.V.; Calà Lesina, A. Strong Coupling of Collective Optical Resonances in Dielectric Metasurfaces. Light. Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, A.; Williams, C.; Wilkinson, T.D. High Transmission Efficiency Hybrid Metal-Dielectric Metasurfaces for Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabassum, S.; Nayemuzzaman, S.K.; Kala, M.; Kumar Mishra, A.; Mishra, S.K. Metasurfaces for Sensing Applications: Gas, Bio and Chemical. Sensors 2022, 22, 6896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochbaum, A.; Dorodnyy, A.; Koch, U.; Koepfli, S.M.; Volk, S.; Fedoryshyn, Y.; Wood, V.; Leuthold, J. Compact Mid-Infrared Gas Sensing Enabled by an All-Metamaterial Design. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 4169–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, D.; Xu, C.; Xie, J.; Lee, C. Research Progress in Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy: From Performance Optimization, Sensing Applications, to System Integration. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, W.; Xin, R.; Yang, D.; Wang, G.; Gao, J.; Cao, H.; Tang, S. Nanoporous-Structured Metasurface Refractive Index Sensor Employing Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 36245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, P.; Qu, S.; Zeng, X.; Su, N.; Chen, M.; Yu, Y. High-Q Refractive Index Sensors Based on All-Dielectric Metasurfaces. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 21264–21269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramadhati, S.; Mallavarapu, A.; Kagan, C.R. State-of-Polarization-Based Refractive Index Sensing Using Dielectric Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 16532–16537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, S.; Tuersun, P.; Li, S.; Wang, M.; Pu, B. Refractive Index Sensing Properties of Metal–Dielectric Yurt Tetramer Metasurface. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Loon, T.; Liang, M.; Delplace, T.; Maes, B.; Murai, S.; Zijlstra, P.; Rivas, J.G. Refractive Index Sensing Using Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum in Silicon Metasurfaces. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 14289–14299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y. Dual-Resonance Sensing for Environmental Refractive Index Based on Quasi-BIC States in All-Dielectric Metasurface. Nanophotonics 2023, 12, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; Liu, Y.; Han, T. Ultra-Broadband Infrared Metasurface Absorber. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 20586–20592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avraham, M.; Nemirovsky, Y. Multiphysics Optical–Thermal and Mechanical Modeling of a CMOS-SOI-MEMS Infrared Sensor with Metasurface Absorber. Sensors 2025, 25, 6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosas, S.; Adi, W.; Beisenova, A.; Biswas, S.K.; Kuruoglu, F.; Mei, H.; Kats, M.A.; Czaplewski, D.A.; Kivshar, Y.S.; Yesilkoy, F. Enhanced Biochemical Sensing with High-Q Transmission Resonances in Free-Standing Membrane Metasurfaces. Optica 2025, 12, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schulz, S.A.; Oulton, R.F.; Kenney, M.; Alù, A.; Staude, I.; Bashiri, A.; Fedorova, Z.; Kolkowski, R.; Koenderink, A.F.; Xiao, X.; et al. Roadmap on Photonic Metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024, 124, 260701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, S.; Devinder, S.; Sahoo, P.K.; Joseph, J. Exploring Tunable Single-Wavelength Detection Schemes for Guided-Mode Resonance Sensors. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024, 177, 111107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamim, S.; Mohsin, A.S.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Hossain Bhuian, M.B. Recent Advances in the Metamaterial and Metasurface-Based Biosensor in the Gigahertz, Terahertz, and Optical Frequency Domains. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aigner, A.; Ligmajer, F.; Rovenská, K.; Holobrádek, J.; Idesová, B.; Maier, S.A.; Tittl, A.; de S. Menezes, L. Engineering of Active and Passive Loss in High-Quality-Factor Vanadium Dioxide-Based BIC Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 10742–10749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeshina, M.A.; Ogunleye, A.M.; Lee, H.; Mareddi, B.; Kim, H.; Park, J. Graphene–Liquid Crystal Synergy: Advancing Sensor Technologies across Multiple Domains. Materials 2024, 17, 4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, C.; Yadav, A.K.; Sharma, M.; Singh, V.K.; Dixit, A. Recent Developments on 2D-Materials for Gas Sensing Application. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2025, 37, 193004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.W.; Eom, T.H.; Cho, S.H.; Jang, H.W. Chemical Sensors Based on Graphene and 2D Graphene Analogs. Adv. Sens. Res. 2023, 2, 2200057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milka, I.A.; Ahadito, B.R.; Desnelli; Hidayati, N.; Said, M. A Review of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Applications: Multifunctional Nanomaterials for Sustainable Environmental and Energy Devices. C 2026, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortés, E.; Wendisch, F.J.; Sortino, L.; Mancini, A.; Ezendam, S.; Saris, S.; de S. Menezes, L.; Tittl, A.; Ren, H.; Maier, S.A. Optical Metasurfaces for Energy Conversion. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 15082–15176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambeck, P.V. Chemo-Optical Microsensing Systems. In Proceedings of the Fiber Optic Sensors: Engineering and Applications; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1991; Volume 1511, pp. 100–113. [Google Scholar]
- Caldararu, F.; Ionescu, C.; Vasile, A.; Caldararu, M. Chemo-Optical Sensor for Toxic Gases Detection. In Proceedings of the 28th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology: Meeting the Challenges of Electronics Technology Progress, 2005; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 71–75. [Google Scholar]
- Veldhuis, G.J.; Berends, J.H.; Heideman, R.G.; Lambeck, P.V. An Integrated Optical Bragg-Reflector Used as a Chemo-Optical Sensor. Pure Appl. Opt. 1998, 7, L23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, X.; Kamin, S.; Liu, N. Dynamic Plasmonic Colour Display. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, G.; Zhou, J.; Bopp, S.E.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z. Visible and Near-Infrared Dual Band Switchable Metasurface Edge Imaging. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 4040–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Li, K.; Lin, Y.-S.; Chen, J. Tunable Visible Metasurface for Color Sensor Application. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 43, 111685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishijima, Y. Mid Infrared Plasmon Metasurfaces for Sensing Applications. In Proceedings of the JSAP-OSA Joint Symposia 2018; paper 19p_211B_13; Optica Publishing Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Ru, Y.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Y.; Li, J.; Hu, H.; Chen, S.; Zhao, X. Flexible Tunable Terahertz Metasurface Sensor Based on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Opt. Lett. 2025, 50, 7111–7114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Y.-S. Tunable MEMS-Based Meta-Absorbers for Nondispersive Infrared Gas Sensing Applications. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2025, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekiguchi, M.; Matsuda, R.; Ogawa, Y.; Matsushita, K.; Ikezawa, S.; Iwami, K. Design, Fabrication and Evaluation of the Metasurface Optical Gas Sensor Using Deep Ultraviolet Plasmon Resonance. In Proceedings of the JSAP-Optica Joint Symposia 2023 Abstracts; paper 19p_A602_7; Optica Publishing Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Piramidowicz, R. Hybrid Metasurface Perfect Absorbers for Temperature and Biosensing Applications. Opt. Mater. 2022, 123, 111906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, J.H.; Li, Z.; Liang, Y.; Tang, T.; Hu, X.Y.; Ou, R.; Ma, Q.J.; Zhang, B.Y.; Cheng, Y.F.; Feng, W.L.; et al. Recent Progress in Two-Dimensional Materials: From Emerging Structures and Synthesis Approaches to Electronic and Sensing Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 520, 166133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, J.-K.; Park, I.-H.; Hong, K.; Kwon, K.C. Recent Advances in Chemoresistive Gas Sensors Using Two-Dimensional Materials. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinayak, R.; Sharma, K. Bridging Porosity and Performance: Design Rules for Industrially Viable Metal Organic Frameworks in CO2 Capture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2026, 390, 137007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fauvel, V.; Gaillard, Y.; Guillemet, R.; Garabédian, P.; Richard, F. Numerical and Experimental Crossed Analysis of Coated Nanostructures through Nanoindentation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2023, 245, 108091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishijima, Y.; Sudo, T.; Matsuo, Y.; Juodkazis, S. A Noble Metal High-Entropy Alloy for Mid-Infrared Metasurfaces. Engineering 2025, 49, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, J.; Chen, Y.; He, Q.; Zhou, L. Metasurface-Assisted Optical Transparency of a Continuous Metal Film. Small Struct. 2025, 6, 2500204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Jin, R.; He, H.; Huang, J.; Li, G.; Huang, L. Robust Ultrahigh-Q Resonances in Tetramer Metasurfaces through Centroid Symmetry Protection and Area Conservation. Light Sci. Appl. 2026, 15, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmoudeh, E.; Farazi, S.; Ahmadi, H.; Zhang, Y. Highly Doped InSb-Based Semiconductor Hyperbolic Metamaterials with Tunable Plasma Wavelength for Mid-Infrared Photonics. Opt. Commun. 2025, 596, 132538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayed, M.; Maher, A.; Ghanim, A.M.; Yahia, A.; Presto, A.A.; Mohamed, A.S. Highly Sensitive All-Silicon Plasmonic Metasurface for CO2 Detection Applications. Opt. Express 2025, 33, 34783–34799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.; Yoon, G.; Kim, J.; Jeong, H.; Kim, Y.; Choi, H.; Badloe, T.; Rho, J.; Lee, H. Thermally-Curable Nanocomposite Printing for the Scalable Manufacturing of Dielectric Metasurfaces. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2022, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iyer, R.B.; Park, S.H.; Bangari, R.; Vaghefi Esfidani, S.M.; Low, T.; Folland, T.G. Dispersion-Engineered Surface Phonon Polariton Metasurfaces for Tunable and Efficient Polarization Conversion. Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 12554–12561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sortino, L.; Gale, A.; Kühner, L.; Li, C.; Biechteler, J.; Wendisch, F.J.; Kianinia, M.; Ren, H.; Toth, M.; Maier, S.A.; et al. Optically Addressable Spin Defects Coupled to Bound States in the Continuum Metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Lin, H.; Lin, S.; Wu, J.; Li, W.; Meng, F.; Yang, Y.; Huang, X.; Jia, B.; Kivshar, Y. Hybrid Anisotropic Plasmonic Metasurfaces with Multiple Resonances of Focused Light Beams. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 8917–8923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.; Jiao, Y.; Liang, J.; Lou, J.; Zhang, J.; Lv, J.; Du, X.; Shen, L.; Zheng, B.; Cai, T. Multifield-Controlled Terahertz Hybrid Metasurface for Switches and Logic Operations. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hou, J.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, R.-Z.; Guo, M. Design of Electromagnetic Metasurface Using Two Dimensional Crystal Nets. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Liu, M.; Cheng, S.; Wang, J.; Yi, Y.; Li, B.; Tang, C.; Gao, F. Bilayer Graphene Metasurface with Dynamically Reconfigurable Terahertz Perfect Absorption. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2025, 80, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagpal, A.; Zhou, M.; Ilic, O.; Yu, Z.; Atwater, H.A. Thermal Metasurface with Tunable Narrowband Absorption from a Hybrid Graphene/Silicon Photonic Crystal Resonance. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 11227–11238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, B.; Huang, Z.; Singh, A.; Yao, Y.; Azad, A.K.; Mohite, A.D.; Taylor, A.J.; Smith, D.R.; Chen, H.-T. Hybrid Graphene Metasurfaces for High-Speed Mid-Infrared Light Modulation and Single-Pixel Imaging. Light Sci. Appl. 2018, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amyar, H.; Ceratti, D.R.; Benisty, H.; Cattoni, A.; Besbes, M.; Faustini, M. Self-Regulating and Self-Oscillating Metal-Organic Framework Hybrid Plasmonic Metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 10392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meinzer, N.; Barnes, W.L.; Hooper, I.R. Plasmonic Meta-Atoms and Metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Liang, Z.; Shi, X.; Li, J.; Guo, S.; Wu, Z.; Sun, W.; Chen, X.; Wei, X.; Dai, R.; et al. Ultraviolet Narrowband All-Dielectric Metasurface Absorber with an Ultra-Thin Absorption Layer. Opt. Lett. 2025, 50, 2049–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, H.; Qiu, S.; Zhou, Z.-K. Hybrid Metasurface Based on Si3N4 Nanopillar for Optical Sensing with Dual Channels. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2025, 8, 2965–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, W.; Abbasi, S.A.; Li, X.; Ho, H.-P.; Yuan, W. Dynamic Tunable and Switchable Broadband Near-Infrared Absorption Modulator Based on Graphene-Hybrid Metasurface. Opt. Laser Technol. 2025, 180, 111460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nugroho, F.A.A.; Bai, P.; Darmadi, I.; Castellanos, G.W.; Fritzsche, J.; Langhammer, C.; Gómez Rivas, J.; Baldi, A. Inverse Designed Plasmonic Metasurface with Parts per Billion Optical Hydrogen Detection. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kühne, J.; Weber, T.; Kühner, L.; Wang, J.; Maier, S.A.; Tittl, A. Fabrication Tolerance Impact on BIC Metasurface Resonances. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Fruncillo, S.; Su, X.; Liu, H.; Wong, L.S. Lithographic Processes for the Scalable Fabrication of Micro- and Nanostructures for Biochips and Biosensors. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 2002–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.-C.; Achouri, K.; Martin, O.J.F. Robustness Analysis of Metasurfaces: Perfect Structures Are Not Always the Best. ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 2438–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, S.Z.; Singh, D.; Nandi, S.; Lewi, T. Temperature Invariant Metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 2023, 12, 3217–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagpal, R.; Ababii, N.; Lupan, O. Comprehensive Advances in Gas Sensing: Mechanisms, Material Innovations, and Applications in Environmental and Health Monitoring. Mater. Today Electron. 2026, 15, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houghton, R.; Martinetti, A.; Majumdar, A. A Framework for Selecting and Assessing Wearable Sensors Deployed in Safety Critical Scenarios. Sensors 2024, 24, 4589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Wu, G.; Wu, W.; Li, S.; Su, C.; Li, L.; Lv, Q. Biomaterials for Biomarker Imaging and Detection. J. Adv. Res. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, X.; Roels, J.; Baets, R.; Roelkens, G. A Miniaturised, Fully Integrated NDIR CO2 Sensor On-Chip. Sensors 2021, 21, 5347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Sensing Mechanism | Primary Physical Perturbation | MS Resonance Type | Dominant Optical Observable | Key Design Parameters | Spectral Regime | Strengths | Limitations/Trade-offs | Representative Gas Sensing Performance Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resonantly enhanced molecular absorption [42,69] | Gas-induced absorption loss (Im{ε}, κ) | Plasmonic or hybrid perfect absorber modes | Intensity attenuation/emissivity change | Mode overlap with gas, resonance linewidth, field enhancement factor | Mid-IR, THz | High chemical selectivity via vibrational fingerprints; ultracompact footprint | Material loss and thermal background; requires spectral alignment | Typically ppm to sub-ppm detection when aligned with molecular absorption bands; high selectivity; response time governed by gas diffusion and optical acquisition speed |
| Refractive index–induced resonance shift [19,75] | Δneff from gas density, adsorption, or infiltration | Mie resonances, guided-mode resonances, quasi-BIC modes | Spectral shift (Δλ or Δω) | Quality factor Q, mode volume Veff, field–gas overlap Γ | Visible–IR | Quantitative sensing; compatible with mature detector technologies | Thermal drift; high-Q modes sensitive to fabrication imperfections | Typically ppm detection limits; sub-ppm achievable in high-Q architectures; sensitivity commonly tens to hundreds nm/RIU; response depends on adsorption kinetics |
| Loss damping/linewidth modulation [76,77,78] | Additional non-radiative decay channels | Hybrid plasmonic resonances | Amplitude modulation/linewidth broadening | Radiative vs. non-radiative loss balance; intrinsic absorption | Visible–IR | Simple fixed-wavelength readout; fast temporal response | Poor intrinsic chemical specificity; baseline drift | ppm to % concentration detection depending on baseline stability; fast response possible; often used for threshold detection applications |
| Material-mediated chemo-optical modulation [22,71,79] | Gas-induced change in ε, birefringence, or conductivity of functional layer | Dielectric or hybrid MSs | Polarization change/intensity modulation | Functional layer thickness; diffusion kinetics; MS polarization sensitivity | Visible–IR | High sensitivity; tunable selectivity via functional material choice | Stability, aging, and response time limited by material chemistry | ppm to sub-ppm possible depending on functional layer; response/recovery dominated by diffusion and adsorption–desorption kinetics |
| Polarization-encoded wavefront modulation [80] | Gas-triggered polarization conversion | Anisotropic dielectric MSs | Holographic image switching/polarization state change | Jones matrix engineering; material birefringence control | Visible | Instrument-free visual readout; intuitive alarm systems | Limited quantitative capability; threshold-type response | Typically threshold or qualitative detection; suitable for safety or wearable alarm applications rather than quantitative sensing |
| Phase-transition-driven plasmonic switching [81] | Gas-induced metal–dielectric phase transition (e.g., Mg ↔ MgH2) | Localized and lattice plasmon modes | Reflectance or color change | Nanoparticle geometry; catalytic layer; diffusion length | Visible | Large visually observable signal; reversible switching | Material fatigue; gas-specific chemistry | ppm-level detection demonstrated for specific gases (e.g., H2); response time governed by phase-transition kinetics |
| Collective lattice resonance sensing [82,83] | Gas-induced perturbation of surface lattice resonances | Surface lattice resonances (SLRs) | Narrow spectral shift/extinction modulation | Array periodicity; particle size; dielectric environment | Visible–NIR | Narrow linewidth vs. isolated nanoparticles | Still limited by metallic ohmic loss | ppm detection achievable; improved spectral resolution vs. single-particle plasmon sensors |
| Hybrid metal–dielectric resonant sensing [20,22,69,75,84] | Environmental perturbation of dielectric-dominated modes | Hybrid Mie–plasmon resonances | Spectral shift with reduced loss | Energy distribution between metal and dielectric regions | Mid-IR | Higher Q with retained field confinement | Increased fabrication complexity | ppm to sub-ppm possible depending on Q-factor and functionalization strategy |
| Material Platform | Representative Systems | Governing Electromagnetic Response | Supported Resonant/Polaritonic Modes | Dominant Spectral Regime | Functional Role in Flatland Gas Sensing | Fundamental Advantage | Intrinsic Physical Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noble metals [121,122,123] | Au, Ag, Al | Drude-like free-electron response with large Im{ε} | Localized surface plasmons, lattice plasmons | Visible–NIR | Extreme near-field confinement and absorption enhancement | Very high local field intensity | Ohmic loss fundamentally limits Q and SNR |
| Heavily doped semiconductors [124,125] | InAs, InSb, ITO | Tunable plasma frequency with reduced damping | Plasmon-like resonances | Mid-IR–THz | Spectral alignment with molecular vibrational bands | Lower loss than noble metals | Strong temperature dependence of carrier density |
| High-index dielectrics [27,126] | Si, Si3N4, TiO2 | Low-loss displacement current response | Mie resonances, guided-mode resonances | Visible–IR | Resonance-shift-based refractive index sensing | High-Q, thermal stability | Limited intrinsic field enhancement |
| Polar dielectrics [127,128] | SiC, hBN | Strong optical phonon resonances (Reststrahlen band) | Surface phonon polaritons | Mid-IR | Low-loss confinement at molecular fingerprint frequencies | Orders-of-magnitude lower loss than metals | Narrow operational bandwidth |
| Hybrid metal–dielectric systems [116,129,130] | Au–Si, Al–Si3N4 | Energy redistribution between lossy and low-loss media | Hybrid plasmon–Mie modes, quasi-BICs | IR | Optimized trade-off between confinement and Q | Enhanced sensitivity with reduced loss | Increased fabrication and design complexity |
| Two-dimensional materials [131,132,133,134] | Graphene, TMDs | Tunable surface conductivity (σ(ω)) | Graphene plasmons, exciton–polaritons | THz–Mid-IR | Electrically tunable gas–plasmon coupling | Extreme field confinement and tunability | Environmental sensitivity and stability |
| Functional material overlays [44,135] | Liquid crystals, MOFs, metal oxides | Gas-induced change in ε, birefringence, or conductivity | Indirectly coupled MS resonances | Visible–IR | Chemical amplification and selectivity layer | High sensitivity and programmability | Diffusion-limited response and aging |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Butt, M.A. Flatland Metasurfaces for Optical Gas Sensing. Sensors 2026, 26, 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041293
Butt MA. Flatland Metasurfaces for Optical Gas Sensing. Sensors. 2026; 26(4):1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041293
Chicago/Turabian StyleButt, Muhammad A. 2026. "Flatland Metasurfaces for Optical Gas Sensing" Sensors 26, no. 4: 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041293
APA StyleButt, M. A. (2026). Flatland Metasurfaces for Optical Gas Sensing. Sensors, 26(4), 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041293
