A Modified Dot-Pattern Moiré Fringe Topography Technique for Efficient Human Body Surface Analysis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Raster-Stereography and Modification in Construction
4. Conventional Moiré Fringe Topography Technique
5. Modified Moiré Fringe Topography Technique
- Improved Accuracy: Curvature estimation was more precise, as discrete circular dots provided clear reference points compared to continuous fringes that often merged or overlapped Figure 5c,d,g,h.
- Enhanced Robustness: The use of circular dots minimized sensitivity to illumination variations, which are a common source of error in conventional moiré fringe topography Figure 5h.
- Reduced Computational Complexity: Required computational complexity was lower due to the discrete point detection in the modified case, as compared with that required for the curve extraction and line tracing steps in the conventional case.
6. Experimental Results: Conventional and Modified Moiré Fringe Topography Technique
6.1. Conventional Moiré Technique
6.2. Modified Circular-Dotted Moiré Technique
6.2.1. Quantitative Error Analysis
6.2.2. Generated Images
6.2.3. Accuracy, Precision and Specificity
- Screening-Oriented Application: The proposed method is intended as a preliminary surface profiling or screening tool, where higher sensitivity and precision are prioritized to avoid missing true structural deviations. In such contexts, false positives are preferable to false negatives and can be resolved through secondary clinical evaluation.
- High Precision and Accuracy Preservation: Despite the reduction in specificity, the method achieves significantly higher precision () and accuracy (), indicating that detected positives are spatially consistent and geometrically accurate, which is critical for surface reconstruction reliability.
- False Positives Are Non-Critical and Controllable: The false positives arise mainly from localized noise and texture-induced artifacts, not from systematic measurement errors. These can be effectively reduced through the following:
- –
- Adaptive thresholding;
- –
- Spatial filtering;
- –
- Morphological post-processing.
6.2.4. Computational Complexity
- Image resolution: ;
- Number of phase-shifted fringe images: K (typically 3–5);
- Phase unwrapping iterations: I;
- Number of detected dots in CDMT: D, where
- Project K phase-shifted fringe patterns;
- Capture K images;
- Image preprocessing (noise removal, normalization);
- Pixel-wise phase calculation using phase-shifting equations;
- Phase unwrapping (spatial/temporal);
- Height/curvature reconstruction.
- Global pixel-wise processing;
- High sensitivity to fringe breaks;
- Iterative phase unwrapping increases time;
- Computational load grows linearly with resolution and iterations.
- Project single circular-dotted pattern;
- Capture a single image;
- Thresholding and dot segmentation;
- Centroid detection for each dot;
- Dot displacement analysis;
- Surface reconstruction.
6.2.5. Specifications of the Experimental Setup
- Projector Specification:
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Full HD).
- Type: DLP or LED projector.
- Brightness: ≥2500 lumens.
- Pattern color: Green ( nm).
- Camera Specification:
- Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (minimum) Preferred: 2592 × 1944 (5 MP).
- Sensor: CMOS.
- Frame rate: ≥30 fps.
- Lens: 25–35 mm (fixed focus recommended).
- Projection Distance:
- Projector–Object distance: 1.0–1.5 m; Optimal: m.
- Camera–Object distance: 1.2–1.8 m.
- Camera–Projector Angle: – (off-axis).
- Dot size (∼1 mm on surface).
- Minimal perspective distortion.
- Comfortable subject positioning.
- Adequate depth sensitivity for facial curvature.
7. Conclusions and Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tabard-Fougère, A.; Bonnefoy-Mazure, A.; Gavira, N.; Arm, S.; Dayer, R. Monitoring curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, assessment of the diagnostic performance of rasterstereography in brace-treated and untreated patients. Eur. Spine J. 2025, 34, 5251–5261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junaid Ahmed, Z. Applications of computer-aided rasterstereography in spinal deformity detection. Image Vis. Comput. 2002, 20, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasim, M.; Kamal, S.A.; Shaikh, A.B. A security system employing edge-based rasterstereography. Int. J. Biol. Biotechnol. 2013, 10, 483–501. [Google Scholar]
- Labecka, M.K.; Plandowska, M. Moiré topography as a screening and diagnostic tool—A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, E0260858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mehta, B.; Chockalingam, N. Non-Invasive Assessment of Back Surface Topography: Technologies, Techniques and Clinical Utility. Sensors 2023, 23, 8485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, N.; Ruiz, J.M.; Hassan, M.; Costa, O.A.; Burke, T.N.; Mei, Q.; Westover, L. Three-dimensional markerless surface topography approach with convolutional neural networks for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis screening. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 8728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Zhang, C.; Shi, W.; Xie, H. 3D sampling moiré measurement for shape and deformation based on the binocular vision. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 167, 109666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Cao, Y.; Li, H.; An, H.; Wu, H. Spatial computer-generated Moiré profilometry. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2024, 367, 115054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyashita, L.; Tabata, S.; Ishikawa, M. High-Speed 3D Vision Based on Structured Light Methods. Metrology 2025, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Z.; Ni, Y.; Yang, Y. Baseline-free structured light 3D imaging using a metasurface double-helix dot projector. Nanophotonics 2025, 14, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohde, M.S.; Albarran, M.; Catanzano, A.A., Jr.; Sachs, E.J.; Naz, H.; Jobanputra, A.; Ribet, J.; Tileston, K.; Vorhies, J.S. Smartphone-based surface topography app accurately detects clinically significant scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2025, 13, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groisser, B.N.; Hillstrom, H.J.; Thakur, A.; Morse, K.W.; Cunningham, M.; Hresko, M.T.; Kimmel, R.; Wolf, A.; Widmann, R.F. Reliability of automated topographic measurements for spine deformity. Spine Deform. 2022, 10, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bassani, T.; Negrini, A.; Rampi, M.; Parzini, M.; Negrini, S. Association between trunk aesthetics and underling scoliosis severity and curve type in adolescents: Evaluation of traditional clinical scores and novel automated indices from rasterstereographic imaging. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2025, 61, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Żurawski, A.Ł.; Friebe, D.; Zaleska, S.; Wojtas, K.; Gawlik, M.; Wilczyński, J. Assessing Trunk Cross-Section Geometry and Spinal Postures with Noninvasive 3D Surface Topography: A Study of 108 Healthy Young Adults. Sensors 2025, 25, 6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alosily, O.A.; Nassif, N.S.; Elborady, A.A.; Abdelmonem, A.F.; Hamada, H.A. Different foot types and spinopelvic mechanics: A cross-sectional study. Fizjoterapia Pol. 2025, 3, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva Filho, J.N.; Batista, L.A.; Gurgel, J.L.; Porto, F. Shadow Moiré technique for postural assessment: Qualitative assessment protocol by intra- and inter-rater evaluation. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2017, 29, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gould, N.; Fontes, M.; Thessin, T.R. Redotopography Apparatus and Method Using MoirÉ Fringe Analysis to Measure Foot Shapes. U.S. Patent No. 5,025,476, 18 June 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Morino, T.; Murakami, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Hino, M.; Misaki, H.; Yamaoka, S.; Kutsuna, T.; Takao, M. Trends in the Prevalence of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in a Japanese Prefecture: A 25-year population-based school screening study using Moiré Topography. Glob. Spine J. 2025, 21925682261417283, online ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Applebaum, A.; Ference, R.; Cho, W. Evaluating the role of surface topography in the surveillance of scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020, 8, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csaba, B. A Research Framework Concept Adapted to Moiré Imaging in Scoliosis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hustinawaty, H.; Rumambi, T.; Hermita, M. Human Shoulder Posture Anthropometry System for Detecting Scoliosis Using Mediapipe Library. J. Appl. Data Sci. 2025, 6, 2144–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akoramurthy, B.; Surendiran, B. QuMo: Benchmarking a Quantum Moiré-Based Classifier for Brain Tumor Diagnosis. 2025. Available online: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7738607/v1?utm_source=sciety_labs_article_page (accessed on 28 January 2026).
- Takasaki, H. Moiré topography. Appl. Opt. 1970, 9, 1467–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, N.; Gang, R.; Ma, S. Learning Moiré pattern elimination in both frequency and spatial domains for image demoiréing. Sensors 2022, 22, 8322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Aspect | Conventional (Line-Based) | Modified (Dot-Based) |
|---|---|---|
| Projection Pattern | Continuous horizontal and vertical lines forming a grid | Dots at grid intersections |
| Contrast Sensitivity | High—lines break on textured/low-contrast surfaces | Low—dots remain visible even under poor contrast |
| Feature Detection | Requires curve tracing and line-following algorithm | Simplified centroid detection of dots |
| Accuracy in Curvature | Moderate—errors introduced by broken or overlapping lines | High—each dot provides an independent reference point |
| Computational Complexity | Higher due to curve extraction and line tracing steps | Lower due to discrete point detection |
| Parameters | Descriptions |
|---|---|
| x | Distance between camera and screen |
| y | Distance between light source and camera |
| p | Pitch of the moiré screen |
| n | Number of fringes |
| Object | Conventional Moiré RMSE (mm) | Modified Dotted Moiré RMSE (mm) | Improvement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sphere | 2.15 | 0.92 | 57.2 |
| Cylinder | 1.84 | 0.76 | 58.7 |
| Capsule | 2.03 | 0.88 | 56.7 |
| Human Face | 2.95 | 0.98 | 66.8 |
| S. No | Wooden Objects | Image of Objects | Objects (with Old Moiré Fringe) | Objects (with New Moiré Fringe) | No. of Patterns (Old Moiré) | Decision Parameter (Old Moiré) | No. of Patterns (New Moiré) | Decision Parameter (New Moiré) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (cm) () | (cm) () | |||||||||
| 1 | Sphere | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 0.5040739 | 0.5035458 | 71.249642 | 0.5041427 | 0.5034216 | 71.2455731 |
| 2 | Square | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 0.6224518 | 0.6341740 | 88.860728 | 0.6173421 | 0.6242615 | 87.7959959 |
| 3 | Cylinder | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 0.3312167 | 0.3452125 | 47.841004 | 0.3452389 | 0.3624790 | 50.0580586 |
| 4 | Capsule | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 0.2120129 | 0.2103260 | 29.864108 | 0.2091368 | 0.2082881 | 29.5164588 |
| 5 | Human Face | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 0.8122553 | 0.8211021 | 95.552102 | 0.8005412 | 0.8010246 | 94.857452 |
| Total (cm) | 333.36758 | 333.473538 | ||||||||
| Parameters | New Moiré (Dotted-Based) | Conventional Moiré (Line-Based) |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 90.50 | 82.30 |
| Precision | 96.70 | 88.00 |
| Specificity | 35.30 | 52.00 |
| Step | Complexity |
|---|---|
| Image preprocessing | |
| Phase calculation (arctangent per pixel) and labeling | |
| Phase unwrapping (iterative, neighborhood-based) | |
| Surface reconstruction |
| Step | Complexity |
|---|---|
| Image preprocessing | |
| Dot detection and labeling | |
| Centroid computation | |
| Displacement and geometry | |
| Surface reconstruction |
| 1. Coefficient of variation in coordinate values of human faces with respect to x-deviations |
| After solving the parameters, we have |
| 2. Coefficient of variation in coordinate values of a sphere with respect to x-deviations |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wasim, M.; Ahsan, S.T.; Ahmed, L.; Sagar, S. A Modified Dot-Pattern Moiré Fringe Topography Technique for Efficient Human Body Surface Analysis. Sensors 2026, 26, 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031063
Wasim M, Ahsan ST, Ahmed L, Sagar S. A Modified Dot-Pattern Moiré Fringe Topography Technique for Efficient Human Body Surface Analysis. Sensors. 2026; 26(3):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031063
Chicago/Turabian StyleWasim, Muhammad, Syed Talha Ahsan, Lubaid Ahmed, and Subhash Sagar. 2026. "A Modified Dot-Pattern Moiré Fringe Topography Technique for Efficient Human Body Surface Analysis" Sensors 26, no. 3: 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031063
APA StyleWasim, M., Ahsan, S. T., Ahmed, L., & Sagar, S. (2026). A Modified Dot-Pattern Moiré Fringe Topography Technique for Efficient Human Body Surface Analysis. Sensors, 26(3), 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031063















