Next Article in Journal
SApneaNet: Adaptive Squeeze-and-Excitation-Based CNN–Transformer Network with AGFF for Sleep Apnea Event Detection Using ECG Images Under IoMT
Previous Article in Journal
Ionospheric Response to the Severe Geomagnetic Storm of 19–21 January 2026 over Almaty (Kazakhstan) According to the Digisonde and GPS Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

I-GraphECG: Observability-Based Lead Selection and Interpretable Disease Prediction from the 12-Lead ECG Using a Gray-Box Graph Electrophysiology Surrogate

by
Limin Zhao
*,
Hongtao Xu
,
Pengjian Wang
,
Weicheng Fu
and
Ningning Zhang
School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(18), 5933; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185933 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 August 2026 / Revised: 9 September 2026 / Accepted: 18 September 2026 / Published: 19 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)

Abstract

Wearable ECG increasingly records fewer than the standard 12 leads, so a model must be accurate, interpretable, and explicit about the information lost under lead reduction. I-GraphECG is a gray-box graph electrophysiology surrogate: an encoder maps a 12-lead median beat to a bounded vector of 47 equivalent electrophysiological descriptors, a constrained eight-node conduction-graph decoder reconstructs the signal, and disease prediction uses the descriptors rather than the waveform. On a clean PTB-XL four-class subset, median beats are reconstructed at median correlation 0.91, and macro-AUROC reaches ≈0.90, near the black-box references (0.920–0.924). Myocardial infarction is under-detected (recall ≈0.49), consistent with the ST-source’s low observability, so the model must not be used as a stand-alone rule-out for infarction. Observability-based sensor selection makes explicit what each lead set can resolve: lead removal provably cannot lower any Cramér–Rao bound; under the data-derived noise models, every optimal three-lead set retains one of the precordial leads V2–V5, and the conventional reduced set is never observability-optimal across seven noise models, though the exact montage is noise-model-dependent. Reconstruction and the observability analysis of the fixed model transfer zero-shot to US and Chinese cohorts; parameter-only disease prediction degrades externally, and infarction, untestable in those cohorts, remains internally demonstrated.
Keywords: electrocardiogram; wearable ECG; interpretable machine learning; graph electrophysiology; observability; optimal sensor selection electrocardiogram; wearable ECG; interpretable machine learning; graph electrophysiology; observability; optimal sensor selection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, L.; Xu, H.; Wang, P.; Fu, W.; Zhang, N. I-GraphECG: Observability-Based Lead Selection and Interpretable Disease Prediction from the 12-Lead ECG Using a Gray-Box Graph Electrophysiology Surrogate. Sensors 2026, 26, 5933. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185933

AMA Style

Zhao L, Xu H, Wang P, Fu W, Zhang N. I-GraphECG: Observability-Based Lead Selection and Interpretable Disease Prediction from the 12-Lead ECG Using a Gray-Box Graph Electrophysiology Surrogate. Sensors. 2026; 26(18):5933. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Limin, Hongtao Xu, Pengjian Wang, Weicheng Fu, and Ningning Zhang. 2026. "I-GraphECG: Observability-Based Lead Selection and Interpretable Disease Prediction from the 12-Lead ECG Using a Gray-Box Graph Electrophysiology Surrogate" Sensors 26, no. 18: 5933. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185933

APA Style

Zhao, L., Xu, H., Wang, P., Fu, W., & Zhang, N. (2026). I-GraphECG: Observability-Based Lead Selection and Interpretable Disease Prediction from the 12-Lead ECG Using a Gray-Box Graph Electrophysiology Surrogate. Sensors, 26(18), 5933. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop