Next Article in Journal
Physics-Informed CNN-BiGRU Model for Downhole Weight-on-Bit Prediction Using Surface Measurement-While-Drilling Sensor Data in Horizontal Wells
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Reliability-Calibrated Consensus–Complementarity–Conflict Modeling for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Attention-Based Quantile Regression for RUL Uncertainty Prediction

Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(15), 4748; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154748
Submission received: 6 June 2026 / Revised: 12 July 2026 / Accepted: 21 July 2026 / Published: 26 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Industrial Sensors)

Abstract

Remaining Useful Life prediction is a core challenge in the field of Prognostics and Health Management. Traditional point prediction methods only provide a single estimate and cannot quantify prediction uncertainty, limiting their application in critical decision-making. This paper proposes a probabilistic prediction model integrating an LSTM–attention mechanism and quantile regression, aiming to achieve interval prediction and uncertainty quantification for RUL. The model employs a bidirectional LSTM network to capture temporal dependencies, focuses on key degradation features through a six-head self-attention mechanism, and outputs predictions for three quantiles (10%, 50%, 90%) simultaneously based on the quantile regression framework, constructing an 80% confidence interval with clear physical meaning. Experimental validation on a public dataset shows that the proposed model performs excellently in both point prediction accuracy and interval prediction quality: RMSE reaches 11.245, NASA Score is 166.414, while the interval coverage remains at 86.7%, and the interval width is 30.398. Ablation experiments further confirm the importance of each component, where removing the attention mechanism causes a 24.4% increase in RMSE, and removing the LSTM module worsens the NASA Score by 164.8%. The research results provide an effective solution for probabilistic remaining life prediction of complex equipment.
Keywords: attention mechanism; quantile regression; RUL; uncertainty prediction attention mechanism; quantile regression; RUL; uncertainty prediction

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, L.; Hu, X.; Gong, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, S. Attention-Based Quantile Regression for RUL Uncertainty Prediction. Sensors 2026, 26, 4748. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154748

AMA Style

Huang L, Hu X, Gong L, Liu Y, Yang S. Attention-Based Quantile Regression for RUL Uncertainty Prediction. Sensors. 2026; 26(15):4748. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Lin, Xianjun Hu, Li Gong, Yajie Liu, and Songlin Yang. 2026. "Attention-Based Quantile Regression for RUL Uncertainty Prediction" Sensors 26, no. 15: 4748. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154748

APA Style

Huang, L., Hu, X., Gong, L., Liu, Y., & Yang, S. (2026). Attention-Based Quantile Regression for RUL Uncertainty Prediction. Sensors, 26(15), 4748. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop