This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Adaptive Reliability-Calibrated Consensus–Complementarity–Conflict Modeling for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion
School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(15), 4745; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154745 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 June 2026
/
Revised: 24 July 2026
/
Accepted: 24 July 2026
/
Published: 26 July 2026
Abstract
Infrared and visible image fusion needs to preserve visible texture details and infrared thermal saliency, yet emphasizing one modality may suppress or distort useful information from the other, while cross-modal differences may also contain noise, pseudo-textures, or locally incompatible boundaries. We propose ARCFusion, which reformulates image fusion as a reliability-calibrated consensus–complementarity–conflict process to achieve a more effective balance between visible texture detail and infrared target saliency. A progressive shared encoder and a modality-specific residual adapter first produce comparable yet modality-aware features. Cross-Modal Explainable Residual Decomposition then estimates jointly supported consensus and represents the information unexplained by the opposite modality as candidate residuals. Trustworthy Complementarity Verification evaluates infrared residuals using source intensity and edge evidence, while visible residuals are examined using source cues and learnable frequency-pattern evidence. Cross-Modal Conflict Estimation further characterizes local incompatibility through co-activation, reliability, amplitude imbalance, edge-strength mismatch, and orientation mismatch. Conflict-Aware Routing finally coordinates consensus and verified residuals according to these relation cues. Unlike conventional shared–private decomposition that directly preserves private features, ARCFusion treats modality-specific residuals as candidates that must be verified and conflict-coordinated before fusion. Experiments on LLVIP, MSRS, and TNO demonstrate consistent fusion performance. On LLVIP, ARCFusion achieves the best EN, SF, AG, VIF, and SCD values of 7.158, 14.467, 4.331, 1.136, and 1.229, respectively. These results indicate that verifying modality-specific residuals and coordinating local conflicts improves the joint preservation of visible texture details and infrared thermal saliency.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Tian, B.; Luo, J.; Lin, K.; Zhang, C.; Qin, T.
Adaptive Reliability-Calibrated Consensus–Complementarity–Conflict Modeling for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion. Sensors 2026, 26, 4745.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154745
AMA Style
Tian B, Luo J, Lin K, Zhang C, Qin T.
Adaptive Reliability-Calibrated Consensus–Complementarity–Conflict Modeling for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion. Sensors. 2026; 26(15):4745.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154745
Chicago/Turabian Style
Tian, Bowen, Jihao Luo, Ke Lin, Changqing Zhang, and Tong Qin.
2026. "Adaptive Reliability-Calibrated Consensus–Complementarity–Conflict Modeling for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion" Sensors 26, no. 15: 4745.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154745
APA Style
Tian, B., Luo, J., Lin, K., Zhang, C., & Qin, T.
(2026). Adaptive Reliability-Calibrated Consensus–Complementarity–Conflict Modeling for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion. Sensors, 26(15), 4745.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154745
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.