Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Occlusion–Predictive Neural Network for Robust Roadside Multi-Vehicle Tracking
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid ISSA-XGBoost Model for Predicting Wellbore Leakage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles: Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges

1
Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary
2
Institute of Safety Science and Cybersecurity, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary
3
Department of Computer Science, J. Selye University, 945 01 Komarno, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(11), 3528; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113528
Submission received: 2 March 2026 / Revised: 14 May 2026 / Accepted: 18 May 2026 / Published: 2 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Vehicular Sensing)

Abstract

The rapid progress of sensing technologies, artificial intelligence, and embedded computing has significantly accelerated the development of autonomous vehicles. Among the core challenges of higher-level driving automation, reliable environmental perception remains one of the most critical. This review presents a systematic PRISMA-based analysis of multimodal sensor technologies and fusion architectures applied in autonomous driving, based on 66 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025. The study examines the operational characteristics, advantages, and limitations of major sensing modalities, including cameras, LiDAR, radar, ultrasonic sensors, and GNSS/IMU-based localization systems. Particular attention is given to multimodal fusion strategies, covering early, mid-level, high-level, and transformer-based architectures that combine complementary sensor information to improve perception robustness and decision reliability. The review further synthesizes current evidence on performance under adverse environmental conditions, benchmark validation practices, real-time computational constraints, and the growing role of functional safety frameworks such as ISO 26262 and SOTIF. Emerging research directions, including 4D radar, self-supervised long-range fusion, foundation models, and cooperative V2X perception, are also discussed. The findings indicate that multimodal sensor fusion is a highly effective architectural strategy for improving scalability, fail-operational robustness, and certifiable safety in autonomous driving systems, particularly in higher-level automation scenarios. Future research should focus on uncertainty-aware fusion, explainable cross-modal reasoning, large-scale real-world validation, and efficient hardware–software co-design to support robust Level 4–5 vehicle autonomy.
Keywords: autonomous vehicles; multimodal sensor fusion; LiDAR; radar; transformer-based fusion; Bird’s Eye View (BEV); functional safety; uncertainty-aware perception; edge AI autonomous vehicles; multimodal sensor fusion; LiDAR; radar; transformer-based fusion; Bird’s Eye View (BEV); functional safety; uncertainty-aware perception; edge AI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Viktor, P.; Kiss, G. Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles: Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges. Sensors 2026, 26, 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113528

AMA Style

Viktor P, Kiss G. Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles: Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges. Sensors. 2026; 26(11):3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Viktor, Patrik, and Gabor Kiss. 2026. "Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles: Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges" Sensors 26, no. 11: 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113528

APA Style

Viktor, P., & Kiss, G. (2026). Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles: Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges. Sensors, 26(11), 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop