Next Article in Journal
A Multilayer Decision-Making Method for UAV Formation Cooperative Flight in Complex Urban Environments
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Sound Intensity Method for Measuring the Increase in Sound Insulation of Small Acoustic Metamaterial Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Brief Report

The Validity of Stryd Leg Stiffness Against the Morin (2005) Sine-Wave Method: A Level-1 Assessment of Flat and Uphill Treadmill Running

by
Diego Jaén-Carrillo
1 and
Antonio Cartón-Llorente
2,*
1
Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, 50830 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(10), 3244; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26103244
Submission received: 26 April 2026 / Revised: 15 May 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Sensing Technologies in Sports Biomechanics)

Abstract

This study evaluated the validity of the leg stiffness metric provided by the Stryd running power meter against the Morin (2005) sine-wave spring–mass model. Twenty-three highly trained trail runners (11 women) completed a 12 min uphill time trial at +12% grade and one hour of submaximal level running. Leg stiffness was calculated from contact time, flight time, running speed, and leg length using Morin’s method, and compared with Stryd values. Agreement was assessed following the Dhahbi and Chamari Level-1 analytical framework, including intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), Bland–Altman analysis, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and paired t-tests. Stryd and Morin estimates showed excellent agreement in both conditions: uphill running: ICC2,1 = 0.96 (95%CI: 0.91–0.98), bias = −0.02 kN·m−1, limits of agreement (LoAs) = [−0.61, 0.58] kN·m−1, MAPE = 2.5% (p = 0.803); and level running: ICC2,1 = 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93–0.99), bias = −0.04 kN·m−1, LoAs = [−0.62, 0.54] kN·m−1, MAPE = 2.6% (p = 0.505). The Stryd sensor provides valid leg stiffness estimates in highly trained trail runners on both level and inclined terrain. The negligible systematic bias and narrow limits of agreement support the use of Stryd for leg stiffness monitoring in field and laboratory settings.
Keywords: spring–mass model; trail running; validation; wearable technology spring–mass model; trail running; validation; wearable technology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaén-Carrillo, D.; Cartón-Llorente, A. The Validity of Stryd Leg Stiffness Against the Morin (2005) Sine-Wave Method: A Level-1 Assessment of Flat and Uphill Treadmill Running. Sensors 2026, 26, 3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26103244

AMA Style

Jaén-Carrillo D, Cartón-Llorente A. The Validity of Stryd Leg Stiffness Against the Morin (2005) Sine-Wave Method: A Level-1 Assessment of Flat and Uphill Treadmill Running. Sensors. 2026; 26(10):3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26103244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaén-Carrillo, Diego, and Antonio Cartón-Llorente. 2026. "The Validity of Stryd Leg Stiffness Against the Morin (2005) Sine-Wave Method: A Level-1 Assessment of Flat and Uphill Treadmill Running" Sensors 26, no. 10: 3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26103244

APA Style

Jaén-Carrillo, D., & Cartón-Llorente, A. (2026). The Validity of Stryd Leg Stiffness Against the Morin (2005) Sine-Wave Method: A Level-1 Assessment of Flat and Uphill Treadmill Running. Sensors, 26(10), 3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26103244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop