Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of Stretchable Piezoelectric Sensor with a Kirigami Design for Heart Sound Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
A Derivative-Based Framework for Real-Time Signal Processing and Event Detection in Impedance Flow Cytometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Wide Dynamic Range Current Sensor Based on Torque-Mode Magnetoelectric Coupling Effect

by
Fuchao Li
1,2,*,
Zihuan Huang
1,
Yuan Meng
1,
Yifei Zhou
1,
Jiefu Zhang
1,
Sujie Liu
1,
Qiang Shi
1,
Ziyang Ye
1 and
Lin Huang
1
1
State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Company, Chengdu 610041, China
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(23), 7236; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25237236
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 21 November 2025 / Accepted: 24 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

The load current of the new power system has significant characteristics on a wide dynamic range, which poses challenges to current sensing technologies. This paper proposes a magnetic-sensitive element based on NdFeB/Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) magnetoelectric composite materials, and further develops a magnetoelectric coupling current sensor. The sensor operates in torque mode, enabling the detection of both wide dynamic range alternating currents and weak alternating currents. Experimental studies show that the sensor achieved a power-frequency current detection sensitivity of 15.56 mV/A, a linear range of (0–120) A, and a detection limit of 153 μA. The results indicate that the sensor exhibits high sensitivity in alternating current (AC) current detection, and at power frequency, possesses both a wide dynamic range and the capability to detect weak currents. Therefore, it shows great application potential in scenarios such as wide dynamic range AC current measurement and weak current detection in power systems.

1. Introduction

The distribution transformer area is the terminal segment of the distribution network and represents the “last mile” of electric energy delivery from generation and transmission to the user side. It carries the crucial responsibility of providing comprehensive power supply services to residential, industrial, and commercial users within the area [1,2]. Its operational status directly affects the quality and standard of the power supply service provided by grid companies. In distribution transformer areas, various types of current parameters with different characteristics exist, such as load current, zero-sequence current, capacitive current, leakage current, and residual current. The perception and measurement of various current parameters using current transformers or current sensors form the foundation for the intelligent upgrading of low-voltage transformer areas and are essential for enhancing operation and maintenance efficiency as well as improving the quality of power supply services. With the transformation of the energy structure and the evolving demands of new-type power systems, the current parameters to be measured have also given rise to sensing requirements for various unconventional current parameters. Consequently, there is a pressing need for novel current sensors capable of delivering high performance across a wide dynamic range spectrum to address these emerging challenges.
At present, various types of current sensors based on different principles have been practically applied in power systems, such as electromagnetic current transformers, shunt resistors, Hall-effect current sensors, Rogowski coils, giant magnetoresistance (GMR) current sensors, and fluxgate current sensors [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Among them, current transformer (CT) technology is the most mature and widely used. Its measurement range is limited because the core material tends to saturate under high currents [9]. Shunt resistors convert current into voltage based on Ohm’s law to enable AC current detection [10], demonstrating superior performance in low-frequency, low-current measurements. However, in high-current measurements, shunt resistors are susceptible to the effects of resistive heating. Their application scenarios are limited since they are invasive measurement methods. Hall-effect current sensors, based on the Hall effect, can detect AC currents and offer a wide measurement range in terms of amplitude and frequency [7]. However, their accuracy in detecting weak currents is relatively poor. Compared to current transformers (CTs), Rogowski coils avoid the problem of core material saturation [11], making them more suitable for wide dynamic range AC current detection. Due to their low sensitivity, they are not suitable for detecting weak currents. Fiber optic current sensors based on the Faraday magneto-optic effect offer advantages such as a wide frequency response and a large dynamic range. Nonetheless, they exhibit poor accuracy in detecting weak currents and have high costs, making them unsuitable for large-scale deployment [12]. Giant magnetoresistance (GMR) current sensors, based on the GMR effect, offer advantages such as high sensitivity, low cost, and a wide frequency range, enabling the detection of both AC and DC currents. However, when exposed to strong magnetic fields, they may suffer permanent damage and have strict requirements on operating temperature, which limits their practical applications [6,13]. Fluxgate current sensors offer advantages such as high accuracy, wide linear range, and high stability. However, due to their high production costs and stringent operating environment requirements, they are mainly used in laboratory precision instruments and are less commonly applied in field environments [8,14]. In summary, while mature technologies and products are currently available for detecting steady-state high currents at power frequency, ongoing research is necessary to address the detection of weak currents and non-steady-state currents.
Against this background, it remains necessary to continuously develop current sensors based on new materials and novel principles to meet the demands of specialized applications. In recent years, novel sensor devices based on the magnetoelectric coupling effect have attracted widespread attention. The magnetoelectric coupling effect refers to the mutual coupling between magnetization and polarization, achieved by fabricating magnetostrictive materials and piezoelectric materials into magnetoelectric composites. When a sensing element based on magnetoelectric composite materials is placed in an alternating magnetic field, it can generate a voltage signal output. Therefore, this principle can be utilized to detect magnetic fields and currents. In 2005, Dong et al. developed a current sensor based on a circular trilayer PZT/Terfenol-D/PZT magnetoelectric composite, capable of detecting currents in the range of 1 Hz to 100 kHz, with a measurement range of (2–10.8) A [15]. In 2013, Zhang et al. developed a ring-shaped current sensor with a Terfenol-D/PZT/NdFeB structure, capable of detecting currents in the range of 10 Hz to 40 kHz, with a sensitivity of 10 mV/A [16]. However, this kind of magnetoelectric coupling sensor, which uses Terfenol-D as the magnetic material layer, invariably requires the application of a DC bias magnetic field of several hundred to several thousand Oersteds. Overall, most existing magnetoelectric sensors face significant limitations in distribution transformer area applications. Their typical requirement for an additional DC bias magnetic field increases system complexity and infrastructure overhead, while their inherently narrow dynamic range and low sensitivity are inadequate for monitoring the widely fluctuating currents encountered in distribution networks. These shortcomings collectively undermine measurement accuracy and operational practicality in this specific scenario, highlighting the critical need for the alternative approach developed in this work.
In response to the limitations of conventional magnetoelectric sensors, this paper proposes a novel current sensor based on an NdFeB/PZT composite. Unlike previous Terfenol-D-based designs that require a substantial DC bias, our sensor operates on a magneto–mechanical–electrical coupling principle in torque mode, thereby eliminating the need for an external bias magnet. This novel design simultaneously provides high sensitivity across a wide dynamic range, including exceptional capability for weak current detection. These combined attributes demonstrate its distinct potential for accurate load and leakage current detection in distribution transformer areas.

2. Design and Fabrication of the Sensing Element

In this study, the magnetoelectric sensing element was fabricated using NdFeB/PZT magnetoelectric composite materials, where the NdFeB serves as the permanent magnet material with a remanent magnetization of 1.01 T, and the PZT is the piezoelectric material of type PZT-5H. The main parameters of the PZT material are the piezoelectric coefficients d33 = 593 pC/N and d31 = −274 pC/N, and the elastic compliance S11E = 16.5 × 10−12 m2/N. The sensitive element is designed with a cantilever beam structure, as shown in Figure 1a. In this structure, the piezoelectric component is sandwiched by an elastic layer, while the other end of the elastic layer is clamped by a pair of NdFeB permanent magnets. Upon exposure to an external AC magnetic field, the permanent magnet material experiences a torque, which in turn induces compressive stress in the piezoelectric material. The piezoelectric material then generates an electrical signal output, thereby enabling passive sensing of the external AC magnetic field. The piezoelectric component, elastic layer, and permanent magnets are bonded together using epoxy resin, which is cured at room temperature for 24 h. The fabricated sensing element is shown in Figure 1b. Its total length is less than 15 mm, which facilitates installation within the air gap of a magnetic concentrator ring.
According to the torque principle, the sensing element experiences a torque under an applied magnetic field, and the magnitude of the torque can be calculated by Equation (1) [17]:
M 0 = μ × B B r · V × B ,
where M0 represents the torque, μ is the magnetic moment, B is the external magnetic flux density, Br is the remanent flux density of the permanent magnet, and V is the total volume of the magnet. As can be seen from Equation (1), all parameters except B are constants; therefore, the magnitude of M0 is determined solely by B, and the two exhibit a linear relationship.
Based on the analysis of the magneto–mechanical–electrical coupling relationship of the sensing element, the correlation between the sensor output voltage V3 and the torque M0 can be further derived, as expressed in Equation (2) [18]:
V 3 = M 0 ω 2 l 2 m d 33 6 E ¯ I C 0 ,
where V3 is the ME voltage of piezoelectric layer. ω is the angular velocity, which is calculated as ω = 2πf. f is the frequency of AC magnetic field. l is the length of the cantilever structure. m is the mass of cantilever structure, including the tip mass. d33 is the piezoelectric coefficient. E ¯ is the equivalent elastic modulus of the cantilever. I is the inertia moment, and C0 is the capacitance of the piezoelectric layer. Therefore, it can be inferred that the output voltage V3 exhibits a linear correlation with the magnetic flux density B. Accordingly, the magnetic flux density B of an external magnetic field can be determined by measuring the output voltage V3 of the sensing element.
In this study, the designed sensing element was simulated using the COMSOL finite element simulation software (v. 5.5.) to investigate the variation pattern of its output signal under changes in the external magnetic field. The simulation results are presented in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2a, when subjected to an external magnetic field excitation, the sensing element undergoes a bending deformation, which induces stress in the piezoelectric material and consequently generates an output signal via the piezoelectric effect. When the frequency of the applied magnetic field matches the resonant frequency of the sensing element, the maximum tip displacement of the element can reach 2.8189 mm. Figure 2b illustrates the output signals of the sensing element under sinusoidal alternating magnetic fields with root mean square (RMS) values of 0.2 Oe, 0.4 Oe, 0.6 Oe, 0.8 Oe, and 1 Oe. The simulation results indicate that the sensing element can effectively track the waveform of the alternating magnetic field, and the amplitude of the output voltage V3 exhibits a linear correlation with the amplitude of the applied magnetic field B. The simulation outcomes are in good agreement with the theoretical derivations given in Equations (1) and (2), demonstrating the high feasibility of employing the sensing element in this magnetic torque mode for magnetic field detection.
The experimental setup, as illustrated in Figure 3, was established to validate the capability of the designed sensing element in detecting alternating magnetic fields. In the experiments, a magnetic field generation device composed of a power amplifier and a Helmholtz coil was employed to produce alternating magnetic fields with frequencies of 1 Hz, 10 Hz, and 50 Hz, and amplitudes ranging from 0.01 Oe to 1 Oe. The fabricated sensing element was placed within the generated magnetic field, and its output voltage was measured using an SR865A lock-in amplifier (Stanford Corporation, Stamford, CT, USA). During the measurements, the lock-in amplifier was configured with a time constant of 1 s and a slope of 24 dB/oct, corresponding to an equivalent noise bandwidth (ENBW) of 78.125 mHz. The device output voltage was normalized by the square root of the ENBW. The experimental results, shown in Figure 4, indicate that the output voltage of the device exhibited a linear correlation with the applied alternating magnetic field, in agreement with both the theoretical analysis and simulation results. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that the detection limit of the sensing element for alternating magnetic fields is 0.01 Oe.
The above experimental results are consistent with the theoretical analysis and simulation results, indicating that the sensitive element designed in this work can be used for detecting alternating magnetic fields and can be further developed into a current sensor for AC current measurement.

3. Design and Development of a Magnetoelectric Coupling Current Sensor

In current sensor design, a magnetic concentrator ring with an air gap is commonly used to concentrate the magnetic field, with the sensitive element placed in the air gap for magnetic field detection, thereby enabling overall current measurement. In this study, the structure of the magnetic concentrator ring was modeled and analyzed using COMSOL finite element simulation software to investigate its structural optimization, as illustrated in Figure 5. Figure 5a shows that the magnetic field generated by the current under test in the conductor is concentrated by the magnetic concentrator ring and transformed into a relatively uniform magnetic field in the air gap. The center point of the air gap in the magnetic concentrator ring was taken as the reference point for magnetic field calculation, from which the relationship between the magnetic flux density and the current amplitude was obtained. As shown in Figure 5b, the magnetic flux density in the air gap exhibited a linear relationship with the current amplitude. By continuously optimizing the parameters of the simulation model, the optimal design of the magnetic concentrator ring was determined, resulting in a rectangular structure with dimensions of 64 mm × 47 mm × 20 mm, an air gap width of 32 mm, and made of 1J85 permalloy.
In this study, a magnetoelectric coupling current sensor was further designed by placing the previously described magnetoelectric coupling sensitive element in the air gap of a magnetic concentrator ring, as shown in Figure 6a. The fabricated prototype of the sensor, based on this design, is shown in Figure 6b, where the magnetic concentrator ring and the sensitive element are mounted on a plastic base. The sensor has two sets of signal ports: one for the sensor output voltage and the other for the excitation signal.

4. Performance Study of Magnetoelectric Coupled Current Sensors

In this work, the performance of the developed magnetoelectric coupled current sensor was experimentally investigated using a current sensor test platform. The schematic diagram and the actual experimental setup are shown in Figure 7a and Figure 7b, respectively. The test platform was equipped with both a high-current test circuit and a low-current test circuit, capable of providing alternating currents up to 600 A and 1 A, respectively. It was also furnished with a current calibrator and a measuring instrument with an accuracy class of 0.05.
The output voltage was measured at 39 points across the 0–120 A range, and a fitting curve was plotted. The test results of the magnetoelectric coupled current sensor for the power-frequency currents are shown in Figure 8. When the RMS value of the measured power-frequency current varied from 0 A to 120 A, the sensor output voltage exhibited a linear response with respect to the current. Based on the slope of the fitted curve, the power-frequency current sensitivity of the sensor was calculated to be approximately 15.56 mV/A. The inset in Figure 8 shows the measurement results under small currents, from which the detection limit of the sensor for power-frequency currents was estimated to be approximately 153 μA.

5. Conclusions

In this work, a magnetoelectric (ME) sensitive element was designed and fabricated based on the magneto–mechanical–electric coupling effect of the NdFeB/PZT composite material in torsion mode. A magnetoelectric coupled current sensor was then developed, and its performance was evaluated using a current sensor test platform. The experimental results show that the developed ME coupled current sensor exhibited a power-frequency current sensitivity of 15.56 mV/A, a linear range of 0–120 A, and a detection limit of 153 μA. The results indicate that the sensor possesses both high sensitivity and a wide dynamic range, enabling it to detect large currents at the hundred-ampere level while maintaining a detection limit down to the hundred-microampere level.
In conclusion, this study lays the groundwork for a new class of magnetoelectric current sensors based on the torque-mode coupling mechanism. To advance this technology toward practical implementation, subsequent work will systematically investigate the sensor’s frequency response, operational bandwidth, and resilience to external magnetic interference, exploring its applicability in diverse scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L.; methodology, F.L. and Z.H.; validation, F.L., Z.H. and Y.M.; formal analysis, J.Z., S.L. and L.H.; investigation, S.L., Q.S. and Z.Y.; resources, Y.M. and Y.Z.; data curation, Z.Y. and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L.; writing—review and editing, F.L. and Z.H.; visualization, Z.H., J.Z. and Q.S.; supervision, Y.M. and Y.Z.; project administration, F.L., Y.M. and Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.M. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Grid Sichuan Electric Power Company Science and Technology Project (Project No. 52199723000U).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the technical support and donations in magnetoelectric materials from Electronic Materials Research Laboratory, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
GMRGiant Magneto Resistance
CTCurrent Transformer
ACAlternating Current
RMSRoot Mean Square
MEMagnetoelectric
ENBWEquivalent Noise Bandwidth

References

  1. An, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Zu, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, D. High-Precision, Self-Powered Current Online Monitoring System Based on TMR Sensors Array for Distribution Networks. Sensors 2025, 25, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fu, Y.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Jiang, X.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, P.; Yu, C.; Wang, J. Research on Field Source Characteristics of Leakage Current of Arrester Based on TMR Sensor. Sensors 2023, 23, 3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ying, D.; Hall, D. Current sensing front-ends: A review and design guidance. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 22329–22346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Budovsky, I.; Marais, L.; Beveren, L. Precision characterisation of current transformers and shunts in the audio frequency range. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2018), Paris, France, 8–13 July 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nassisi, V.; Delle Side, D. Linear rogowski coil. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2017, 88, 024701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gawade, T.; Borole, U.; Behera, B.; Khan, J.; Barshilia, H.; Chowdhury, P. Giant magnetoresistance (GMR) spin-valve based magnetic sensor with linear and bipolar characteristics for low current detection. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2023, 573, 170679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Crescentini, M.; Syeda, S.; Gibiino, G. Hall-effect current sensors: Principles of operation and implementation techniques. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 10137–10151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koch, R.; Rozen, J. Low-noise flux-gate magnetic-field sensors using ring- and rod-core geometries. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 1897–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ripka, P.; Draxler, K.; Styblíková, R. DC-compensated current transformer. Sensors 2016, 16, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kaczmarek, M.; Kaczmarek, P.; Stano, E. Evaluation of the current shunt influence on the determined wideband accuracy of inductive current transformers. Energies 2022, 15, 6840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grim, V.; Ripka, P. Rogowski coil with ferromagnetic powder core. IEEE Magn. Lett. 2022, 13, 8102304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, B. Review of the present status of optical fiber sensors. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2003, 9, 57–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Z.; Dixon, S. A closed-loop operation to improve GMR sensor accuracy. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 6003–6007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Narod, B.; Russell, R. Steady-state characteristics of the capacitively loaded flux gate sensor. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1984, 20, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dong, S.; Bai, J.; Zhai, J.; Li, J.; Lu, G.; Viehland, D.; Zhang, S.; Shrout, T. Circumferential-mode, quasi-ring-type, magnetoelectric laminate composite-a highly sensitive electric current and/or vortex magnetic field sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 182506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, S.; Leung, C.; Kuang, W.; Wing Or, S.; Ho, S. Concurrent operational modes and enhanced current sensitivity in heterostructure of magnetoelectric ring and piezoelectric transformer. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 17C733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, B.; He, Y.; Jiang, C.; Stamenov, P.; Coey, J.M.D. Torque in Open-access Permanent Magnet Variable Flux Sources. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 500, 166430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, J.; Hu, Z.; Cheng, M.; Zhao, X.; Guan, M.; Su, W.; Xian, D.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Peng, B.; et al. Highly sensitive magneto-mechano-electric magnetic field sensor based on torque effect. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. NdFeB/PZT sensing element: (a) structural schematic; (b) photograph of the element.
Figure 1. NdFeB/PZT sensing element: (a) structural schematic; (b) photograph of the element.
Sensors 25 07236 g001
Figure 2. Finite element simulation results: (a) deformation of the sensing element under an external magnetic field; (b) variation of the output voltage of the sensing element with respect to the external magnetic field strength.
Figure 2. Finite element simulation results: (a) deformation of the sensing element under an external magnetic field; (b) variation of the output voltage of the sensing element with respect to the external magnetic field strength.
Sensors 25 07236 g002
Figure 3. Test environment for evaluating the detection capability of sensitive elements to alternating and static magnetic fields.
Figure 3. Test environment for evaluating the detection capability of sensitive elements to alternating and static magnetic fields.
Sensors 25 07236 g003
Figure 4. Output of sensitive elements under alternating magnetic fields.
Figure 4. Output of sensitive elements under alternating magnetic fields.
Sensors 25 07236 g004
Figure 5. Simulation of the magnetic concentrator ring structure: (a) magnetic field distribution under the test current; (b) relationship between the magnetic flux density in the air gap and the amplitude of the test current.
Figure 5. Simulation of the magnetic concentrator ring structure: (a) magnetic field distribution under the test current; (b) relationship between the magnetic flux density in the air gap and the amplitude of the test current.
Sensors 25 07236 g005
Figure 6. Magnetoelectric current sensor: (a) structural diagram; (b) physical sensor.
Figure 6. Magnetoelectric current sensor: (a) structural diagram; (b) physical sensor.
Sensors 25 07236 g006
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram of the testing platform for the AC/DC current sensor. (b) Photo of the experimental setup.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram of the testing platform for the AC/DC current sensor. (b) Photo of the experimental setup.
Sensors 25 07236 g007
Figure 8. The testing results for 50 Hz AC current in the range of 0–120 A.
Figure 8. The testing results for 50 Hz AC current in the range of 0–120 A.
Sensors 25 07236 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, F.; Huang, Z.; Meng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Shi, Q.; Ye, Z.; Huang, L. A Wide Dynamic Range Current Sensor Based on Torque-Mode Magnetoelectric Coupling Effect. Sensors 2025, 25, 7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25237236

AMA Style

Li F, Huang Z, Meng Y, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Liu S, Shi Q, Ye Z, Huang L. A Wide Dynamic Range Current Sensor Based on Torque-Mode Magnetoelectric Coupling Effect. Sensors. 2025; 25(23):7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25237236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Fuchao, Zihuan Huang, Yuan Meng, Yifei Zhou, Jiefu Zhang, Sujie Liu, Qiang Shi, Ziyang Ye, and Lin Huang. 2025. "A Wide Dynamic Range Current Sensor Based on Torque-Mode Magnetoelectric Coupling Effect" Sensors 25, no. 23: 7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25237236

APA Style

Li, F., Huang, Z., Meng, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Shi, Q., Ye, Z., & Huang, L. (2025). A Wide Dynamic Range Current Sensor Based on Torque-Mode Magnetoelectric Coupling Effect. Sensors, 25(23), 7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25237236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop