3.1. Uranium
Due to its natural abundance and significant role in the nuclear industry, uranium is the primary actinide studied for detection using sensors. A recent review by Wu et al. highlights that fluorescent sensors are the most popular choice, owing to their superior sensitivity and selectivity for uranium over other metals [
34]. In nature, uranium is predominantly found in the +VI oxidation state, corresponding to the trans-dioxo form [UO
2]
2+, commonly known as uranyl. Uranyl ions accept ligands in their equatorial plane, typically with a coordination number ranging from 4 to 6 [
35,
36,
37].
[UO
2]
2+ ions emit intrinsic fluorescence in the range of 450–600 nm under UV excitation. This property was widely exploited during the latter half of the 20th century for detecting uranium in geological samples [
38]. The detection of trace levels of uranium requires laser excitation of the sample, typically using laser fluorimetry or, for enhanced sensitivity and speciation capability, time-resolved laser-induced fluorimetry [
39]. The intrinsic fluorescence of uranium can be significantly enhanced by stabilizing it with an appropriate ligand. Dipicolinic acid (DPA), which forms a 1:2 complex with uranyl ions in aqueous medium ([UO
2]
2+:DPA), serves this purpose effectively [
40,
41]. DPA enhances the fluorescence emission of uranyl by an approximate factor of six compared to the emission in the absence of the ligand [
42]. Trimesic acid and phosphoric acid have also been shown to enhance uranyl fluorescence in an aqueous solution [
43,
44]. Maji and Viswanathan further demonstrated a co-fluorescence effect with the addition of yttrium ions, enabling uranium detection at the ppm level [
44].
However, the detection limits of these techniques, especially for field measurements, was proven to be limited. In response, the past two decades have seen a growing interest in the development of fluorescence sensors for [UO2]2+, significantly enhancing both sensitivity and selectivity.
3.1.1. Organic Ligands
A wide variety of organic fluorescent sensors have been specifically developed for uranyl detection (
Table 3). In most cases, a fluorescent moiety is linked to a coordination site for the [UO
2]
2+ cation. Uranyl complexation enables detection through one of three mechanisms: fluorescence enhancement (turn-on), fluorescence quenching (turn-off), or a shift in fluorescence emission.
A tetraphenylethylene (TPE) moiety (
Figure 4a) linked to a uranyl-specific coordination unit has been widely utilized over the past decade for detecting uranyl ions (
Table 3). TPE-based sensors are generally fluorescent, but their fluorescence is quenched upon uranyl complexation through the ACQ effect. Wen et al. reported the design of TPE-T, where the uranyl coordination unit is 2-(4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)phenol [
45]. In this system, uranyl ions are stabilized coordination with two TPE-T moieties, leading to ACQ. TPE-T exhibits 96% fluorescence quenching in the presence of uranyl ions, enabling clear differentiation from other metal ions. Additionally, TPE-T operates effectively across a broad pH range and demonstrates strong anti-interference capabilities, making it highly suitable for environmental applications, such as determining uranyl concentrations in river water.
Table 3.
[UO2]2+ sensors. NMM: N-methyl-mesoporphyrin IX.
Table 3.
[UO2]2+ sensors. NMM: N-methyl-mesoporphyrin IX.
Type | Compound | Mechanism | / (nm) | LOD (nM) | Matrix | Refs. |
---|
TPE- | 2-(4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)phenol | ACQ | 280/494 | nd | River water (pH 2–10) | [45] |
based | Salophen | ACQ | 345/548 | 39 | Drinking water (pH 3–9) | [46] |
| Carbamoylphosphine oxide | ACQ | 330/470 | 32 | Tap water (pH 4) | [47] |
| Amidoxime | ACQ | nd/444 | 4.7 | River water (pH 4–7) | [48] |
| Amidoxime | ACQ | 340/485 | 7.9 | Drinking water (pH 3–13) | [49] |
| Carbodiimide | ACQ/PCT | 346/512 | 0.07 | Nuclear waste and seawater (pH 5–9) | [50] |
| 2-hydroxy-benzalaniline | AIE | 350/500 | 11 | Natural water (pH 4–9) | [51] |
TPA- | 2-(4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)phenol | ACQ | 350/510 | 50 | Water (pH 4.5–7)/living cells | [52] |
based | 2-(Aminophenyl)iminomethylphenol | ACQ | 380/550 | 39 | Water (pH 2–10)/living cells | [53] |
| TPA-benzoyl hydrazine | ACQ | 384/510 | 0.2 | Water (pH 2–10)/living cells | [54] |
| 4-aldehyde-4,4-bis(4-pyridyl)TPA | ACQ | 430/525 | 0.01 | Groundwater (pH 7.4) | [54] |
Salicyl | 4-pethoxycarboxyl SA | AIE | 370/540 | 0.8 | Nuclear wastewaters (pH 7–10) | [55] |
aldehyde | 3-hydroxy-flavone SA | AIE | 370/457 | 2.1 | H2O (pH 5–8.5)/living cells | [56] |
azine (SA) | SA and 5-nitro SA | AIE | 365/550 | 23 | H2O/CH3CN mixture | [57] |
Other | Calcein | Turn-off | 492/520 | 60 | H2O (pH 4) | [58] |
organic | Quinoxalinol salen | Turn-off | 450/540 | nd | H2O/DMF mixture | [59] |
ligands | Curcumin | Turn-off | 424/507 | nd | Tap water (pH 4) | [60] |
| Esculin | Turn-off | 390–455 | 6 | H2O (pH 5–7) | [61] |
| Naphthalimide | Turn-off | 403/523 | 4100 | Acetonitrile | [62] |
| Furosemide | Turn-on | 320/522 | 500 | H2O (pH 5.5) | [63] |
| Fluorophore | Quencher | | | | | |
DNAzymes | Fluorescein | Black Hole | FRET turn-on | nd/520 | 0.05 | Soil samples (pH 5.5) | [64] |
| amidite | Quencher 1 | FRET turn-on | 487/520 | 0.02 | Tap and river waters (pH 5.5) | [65] |
| (FAM) | Dabcyl | FRET turn-on | nd/520 | 0.6 | Living cells | [66] |
| | Graphene oxide | FRET turn-on | 490/nd | 0.03 | Tap and river waters (pH 5.5) | [67] |
| | AuNPs | FRET turn-on | nd | 0.01 | Natural waters (pH 5.5) | [68] |
| | AuNPs | FRET turn-on | nd/520 | 0.0001 | River water (pH 5.5) | [69] |
| | MoS2 nanosheets | FRET turn-off | 495/525 | 0.002 | River water (pH 5.5) | [70] |
| Rhodamine | Guanine bases | FRET turn-on | 399/609 | 0.09 | Natural waters (pH 5.5) | [71] |
| SYBR Green I | None | FRET turn-off | nd/525 | 0.2 | Natural waters (pH 3.5) | [72] |
Eu compound | Salophen-Eu-phosphate | PeT turn-on | no/413 | 8 | Water (pH 4–9) | [73] |
Eu compound | Eu-phosphate | PeT turn-on | 400/597 | 10 | Water (pH 7.2–8.8)/cells | [74] |
Lin et al. introduced a second TPE-based fluorophore utilizing salophen as the uranyl coordination unit [
46]. Salophen, N,N′-Bis(salicylidene)-1,2-phenylenediamine, is well known for its strong affinity for [UO
2]
2+, forming a stable complex with a 1:1 stoechiometry [
75]. Similar to TPE-T, uranyl complexation with salophen results in fluorescence quenching, enabling a limit of detection as low as 39 nM. Lin et al. also developed a self-assembled monolayer incorporating TPE in conjunction with carbamoylphosphine oxide as the uranyl coordination unit [
47]. These compounds are randomly distributed on a quartz glass substrate, enabling fluorescence quenching upon uranyl complexation. This configuration enhances detection capabilities, offering a robust platform for sensitive uranyl ion sensing.
Ding et al. and Zhan et al. developed uranyl sensors, TPE-A and TPE-ADX, respectively, based on TPE combined with amidoxime as the coordination unit [
48,
49]. Both sensors utilize fluorescence quenching upon uranyl complexation, facilitated via the interaction of two amidoxime moieties with the uranyl ion. TPE-ADX demonstrates a broader pH range (pH 3–13) compared to TPE-A (pH 4–7). Both sensors achieve low detection limits, with 4.7 nM for TPE-A and 7.9 nM for TPE-ADX. Feng et al. developed another TPE-based fluorescent sensor incorporating carbodiimide to create uranyl-specific coordination sites. This sensor achieves an ultra-low detection limit of 69 pM and demonstrates high selectivity by leveraging ACQ and PCT mechanisms. It operates effectively within a pH range of 5–9.
Lin et al. developed a distinct TPE-based sensor, in which TPE is linked to 2-hydroxy-benzalaniline, which operates through its hydrolysis induced via uranyl ions [
51]. The hydrolysis product leads to enhanced and blue-shifted fluorescence upon interaction with [UO
2]
2+, contrasting with the fluorescence quenching observed in previous TPE-based sensors.
Triphenylamine (TPA) (
Figure 4b) is widely used in the design of fluorescent sensors due to its strong electron-donating properties [
76]. TPA-based sensors generally exhibit fluorescence, which is quenched upon interaction with uranyl ions, making them effective turn-off probes (
Table 3). Zheng et al. designed a probe in which TPA is linked to a 2-(4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)phenol coordination unit [
52]. It exhibits high selectivity for uranyl ions, even in the presence of other metal ions, with interference from Cu
2+ and Ni
2+ being manageable through the use of masking agents like EDTA. Subsequently, Wu et al. developed a TPA-based probe, which incorporates a modified benzalaniline as the coordination unit for [UO
2]
2+ [
53]. This sensor demonstrated a low detection limit of 39 nM, and it showed excellent anti-interference capabilities across a pH range of 2–10. Another TPA-based sensor, 4-aldehyde-4,4-bis(4-pyridyl)TPA, achieved an ultralow detection limit of 0.01 nM for uranyl in groundwater, relying on uranyl-triggered protein cleavage that ensures high selectivity by eliminating interference from other cations [
54].
The salicylaldehyde azine (SA) moiety can also function as an AIE fluorophore (
Table 3). Chen et al. demonstrated that 4-pethoxycarboxyl SA [
55] and 3-hydroxy-flavone SA [
56] function as turn-on AIE sensors. These compounds aggregate upon interaction with [UO
2]
2+, leading to fluorescence emission (
Figure 5). Interestingly, SA and 5-nitro SA were shown to exhibit a contrasting behavior: uranyl ions quench the AIE effect in an organoaqueous solvent by disrupting aggregation, as reported by Pham et al. [
57].
Nivens et al. demonstrated that the fluorescence of calcein, a dye molecule, is quenched upon complexation with uranyl ions [
58]. Following the excitation of the complex at 425 nm, a photochemical reaction occurs, involving the decarboxylation of calcein and the dissociation of the complex. The photochemical oxidation reverses the quenching and enhances the fluorescence signal, making it a useful method for detecting uranyl ions selectively.
Various other organic ligands serve as turn-off probes, in which complexation with [UO
2]
2+ quenches fluorescence emission (
Table 3). Among these are quinoxalinol salen ligands, for which the quenching is accompanied by a blue shift in emission, whereas Cu
2+ complexation presents a red shift [
59]. Curcumin forms a 1:2 complex with uranyl ions ([UO
2]
2+:curcumin), leading to a slight red shift in fluorescence and a distinct color change from bright yellow to orange [
60]. The fluorescence quenching induced via uranyl complexation with esculin is further enhanced through the adsorption of esculin and uranyl ions onto SBA-15 resin [
61]. Additionally, Kim and Tsukahara developed a sensor that combines diaza-18-crown-6 ether as the uranyl coordination site with a naphthalimide moiety as fluorophore [
62].
On the other hand, the furosemide compound 4-chloro-2(furan-2-ylmethylamino)-5-sulfamoylbenzoic acid leads to an enhancement in the fluorescence emission by forming a 1:1 complex with uranyl ion [
63].
3.1.2. DNA
DNAzymes are DNA molecules with catalytic activity, often dependent on metal ion cofactors for their function. They are widely used in fluorescent sensors due to their ability to undergo conformational changes or catalyze specific reactions upon binding with target metal ions [
77]. Liu et al. developed a DNAzyme with a selective complexation site for uranyl ions and a fluorophore positioned at the strand’s extremity [
64]. The fluorescence emission of the fluorophore is suppressed by a quencher located opposite to it on the complementary strand, an effect attributed to FRET (
Figure 6). A ribonucleotide adenosine (rA) site is incorporated near the uranyl complexation site; upon binding to uranyl ions, the DNAzyme catalyzes the cleavage of the rA site (optimal at pH 5.5 [
70]), resulting in the release of the strand comprising the fluorophore. Once free from the quencher, fluorescence emission is recovered, enabling the detection of uranyl ions with a detection limit of 45 pM. Gold nanoparticles are integrated into this system to create biocompatible probes for detecting [UO
2]
2+ in living cells [
78]. This model, based on the rA site and the release of a fluorophore, has been taken up by several other studies (
Table 3).
Fluorescein amidite (FAM) remains one of the most commonly used fluorophores for designing turn-on probes, paired with various quenchers as detailed in
Table 3 [
64,
65,
66,
67,
68,
69]. Notable examples include a dual probe for intracellular detection of Pb
2+ and [UO
2]
2+ ions [
66], the use of graphene oxide as a free quencher to avoid quencher labeling [
67], and DNA amplification strategies to enhance sensitivity [
68,
69]. Turn-off probes can also be created, through which the quencher is not integrated into the DNAzyme. Instead, once released from the DNAzyme, FAM interacts with MoS
2 nanosheets that quench its fluorescence [
70].
Xiao et al. used tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine as the fluorophore and four guanine bases as quenchers positioned at the strand’s extremity [
79]. A PeT effect occurs between the fluorophore and the quenchers until the fluorophore is released, restoring fluorescence and functioning as a turn-on probe. N-methyl-mesoporphyrin IX is used as the fluorophore, while graphene oxide serves as a free quencher, to design a turn-on probe [
71]. Zhu et al. developed a DNAzyme that, upon rA cleavage, undergoes a conformational change to form a G-quadruplex [
72]. SYBR Green I, a fluorophore initially bound to the DNAzyme, loses its fluorescence when released, functioning as a turn-off probe.
The use of DNAzymes for [UO
2]
2+ detection via fluorescence demonstrates excellent limits of detection, with nearly all probes achieving sensitivity at the picomolar level (
Table 3). Additionally, these probes exhibit good selectivity for uranyl and are often biocompatible, enabling their use for detection in living cells.
Other oligonucleotide-based sensors have been developed, utilizing fluorophores such as tryptophan [
80] or dansyl groups [
81] incorporated into a peptidic chain. Additionally, a salophen moiety has been immobilized onto silica gel particles as a solid-phase receptor for uranyl [
82]. An oligonucleotide chain labeled with FAM subsequently interacts with the apical oxygen atom of the uranyl ion, forming a sandwich supramolecule. Following HCl elution, the fluorescence intensity is measured, allowing for uranyl detection with a LOD of 0.84 nM.
3.1.3. Others
Jiang et al. developed a surface fluorescence sensor based on a Salophen-europium(III) complex for detecting uranium without external excitation [
73]. The fluorescence mechanism is based on the cation–cation interaction (PeT process) between U(VI) and Eu(III) through a phosphate bridge, on the surface of a glass slide, leading to intense fluorescence with a LOD of 8 nM. This europium phosphate uranyl strategy has also been applied to the fluorescence imaging of [UO
2]
2+ in cells [
74].
Several studies report the development of polymer-based sensors for the detection of uranyl ions via fluorescence quenching. The amidoxime group is frequently employed as a coordination site for uranyl within the polymer, enabling detection through the PeT effect [
83,
84]. In these systems, fluorescence is achieved by incorporating the amidoxime moiety into the polymer chain. Amidoxime groups can also be linked to 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene to create fluorescent microporous polymers, which allow the simultaneous adsorption and detection of uranium [
85]. Additionally, other compounds such as porphyrin [
86], trimetazidine [
87], clopidogrel [
88], and quinoline [
89] have been incorporated into polymers to detect uranium via fluorescence quenching upon uranyl complexation.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) exhibit high adsorption capacity for uranium. The incorporation of emissive central metal atoms enables luminescent properties, facilitating the development of MOF-based fluorescent sensors. A wide variety of MOF sensors has been developed, which includes different metal atoms such as Tb(III) [
90,
91,
92,
93,
94,
95], Co(II) [
96], Zr(IV) [
97], Ni [
98], and Zn(II) [
99,
100]. These examples present limits of detection below 100 nM.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have emerged as versatile fluorescent platforms for uranium detection and extraction, combining stability, tunable functionality, and rapid response [
101,
102,
103,
104,
105,
106]. Functionalized architectures such as
sp2 carbon-conjugated amidoxime COFs [
101], hydroxyl-functionalized 3D COFs [
102], and β-keto-enamine COFs [
106] enable selective sensing with low detection limits (typically 4–100 nM) in aqueous and environmental matrices. Further refinements include olefin-linked COFs bearing amidoxime, pyridine, and hydroxyl groups with improved recovery [
103], exfoliated nanosheet COFs that mitigate aggregation quenching to achieve 10 nM sensitivity [
104], and porphyrin-based COFs with sub-nanomolar limits of detection [
105]. Collectively, these studies highlight the importance of rational functionalization and structural engineering in advancing COFs as regenerable probes for uranium monitoring in complex matrices.
Quantum dots (QDs) are extensively used as fluorescent probes, primarily in the form of carbon dots [
107] and cadmium dots [
108]. Carbon dots stand out due to their lower toxicity, which makes them particularly suitable for biological and environmental applications [
109].
3.1.4. Conclusions
The development of fluorescent sensors for uranium has made significant strides over recent decades. Researchers have designed various types of selective and sensitive probes, including organic ligands, DNAzymes, MOFs, and QDs. Advances in organic ligand design, especially in the last decade with TPE-based systems, have lowered detection limits into the nanomolar range, addressing environmental and industrial needs. Additionally, DNAzyme sensors containing the rA cleavage site have demonstrated detection limits in the picomolar range, with high sensitivity and biocompatibility, enabling applications in complex biological and environmental matrices. However, despite these promising results, key performance factors such as selectivity in real-world matrices, stability, and probe reusability are not often explored. These criteria must be addressed to ensure that fluorescent sensors can be reliably applied for the field monitoring of uranium contamination.
3.4. Technetium
99Tc, an isotope of technetium, the lightest non-stable element, is a byproduct of nuclear reactors. This isotope raises substantial environmental concerns due to its long half-life and high mobility in environmental systems, especially in the pertechnetate form (TcO
4−), which can readily migrate through soil and groundwater [
159]. The perrhenate ion, ReO
4−, is frequently employed as a non-radioactive surrogate of TcO
4− to study technetium detection through fluorescence due to its comparable physical and chemical properties. Fluorescent probes for technetium detection are presented in
Table 6.
Arrigo et al. developed phosphiniminium cations linked to anthracene moieties (
Figure 8a) that exhibit high selectivity for TcO
4−, even in the presence of competing anions such as chloride, nitrate, and phosphate [
160]. Although no significant spectral shift was detected, which limits its effectiveness as a fluorescent probe, the system demonstrated potential as a scintillation sensor for
99Tc detection due to its responsiveness to beta emissions from technetium’s radioactive decay.
Amendola et al. developed a fluorescent sensor for TcO
4− in water, using an azacryptand cage [
161]. An anthracene incorporated into the azacryptand structure (
Figure 8b) enhances the detection of TcO
4− through fluorescence quenching via the PeT effect in aqueous solutions at pH 2. This receptor is highly selective, showing no interference from environmentally prevalent anions such as chloride, nitrate, and sulfate.
The weak hydration properties of perrhenate and pertechnetate anions facilitate the formation of contact ion pairs with certain cationic fluorescent probes. Auramine O (
Figure 8c), a cationic molecular rotor dye, forms fluorescent aggregates with ReO
4−, resulting in both an emission enhancement and a red shift (AIE effect) [
162]. Thioflavin-T and pseudoisocyanine (respectively,
Figure 8d,e), other cationic fluorescent molecules, act as turn-on probes by aggregating with perrhenate anions [
163,
164]. Notably, pseudoisocyanine exhibits a particularly low limit of detection for perrhenate anions, reported at 0.2 µM, outperforming other sensors.
1-pyrenemethylamine (PMA,
Figure 8f) is used as a turn-off probe with perrhenate anion [
165]. The selectivity of the sensor is attributed to the strong hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions between a ReO
4− anion and the amino group of PMA, facilitating a photoinduced electron transfer process.
On the other hand, various macrostructures have been developed for the fluorescence detection of TcO
4− and ReO
4−. Fluorescent MOFs are one such approach, with Rapti et al., who developed two Zr-based MOFs, MOR-1 and MOR-2, demonstrating effective sorption capacities for TcO
4− and ReO
4− [
166]. Notably, MOR-2 functions as a selective luminescent sensor for ReO
4− in highly acidic conditions, where fluorescence quenching is based on a ligand-to-anion electron transfer. Xu et al. presented an example of a cationic photoactive porous aromatic framework material functionalized with an Ir(III) organometallic complex [
167]. The detection mechanism for TcO
4− involves a strong, selective interaction between the Ir(III) complex and the anion, resulting in a fluorescence turn-on response. Li et al. described the coordination polymer TJNU-302, a cationic Ag(I) coordination polymer that incorporates a fluorescent ligand, 1,2,4,5-tetra(pyridin-4-yl)benzene [
168]. TJNU-302 shows high selectivity and efficiency in capturing and sensing perrhenate ions, with fluorescence quenching attributed to hydrogen bonding between ReO
4− and the framework.
Choi and Lee developed a carbon quantum-dot-based sensor specifically designed for detecting perrhenate anions in aqueous solutions [
169]. This sensor uses cationic carbon quantum dots functionalized with quaternary ammonium groups to enhance selectivity and sensitivity for ReO
4−. The fluorescence mechanism relies on PeT process facilitated via electrostatic interactions between the cationic carbon quantum dots’ surface and the anions, resulting in fluorescence intensity reduction. Yi et al. introduced an ionic liquid-modified covalent organic framework incorporating nitrogen groups to bind ReO
4− anion [
170]. The fluorescence quenching mechanism in this framework involves intramolecular charge transfer, upon ReO
4− binding.
Tc(CO)
3+, a cationic form of
99Tc, is also present in significant amounts in nuclear waste. With the aim of monitoring Tc(CO)
3+ in nuclear waste, Branch et al. developed a method to convert Tc(CO)
3+ into a fluorescent complex using a bipyridyl ligand [
171]. This complexation induces fluorescence, enabling the detection of Tc(CO)
3+ with a limit of detection of 0.2 µM.
The fluorescence-based detection of technetium has progressed through the development of small-molecule probes and macrostructures designed to target the pertechnetate anion or its non-radioactive surrogate, the perrhenate anion in aqueous medium. These include organic ligands utilizing hydrogen bonding, MOFs, and carbon quantum dots achieving detection limits in the micromolar range.
3.5. Zirconium
Zirconium’s corrosion resistance, heat tolerance, and low neutron absorption make it ideal for cladding fuel rods in water-cooled reactors, with nearly 90% of global zirconium production dedicated to nuclear energy. Zirconium is commonly used in medical implants due to its biocompatibility and low chemical toxicity [
172]. However, detecting zirconium could serve as a safety marker around nuclear reactors. The long-lived fission product
93Zr has low specific activity and radiation energy, resulting in minimal radiological risk. Zirconium is found in the environment in stable forms such as ZrSiO
4 and ZrO
2, which are largely insoluble in water, keeping zirconium fixed in soils and sediments [
173]. Under certain conditions, zirconium can exist as Zr
4+ ions or in various hydroxo and oxo complexes. Fluorescent probes for technetium detection are presented in
Table 7.
The first published work appeared in 1951, when Alford et al. reported a fluorometric method for determining zirconium using 3-hydroxyflavone (
Figure 9a) as a fluorescent probe [
177]. This procedure involves forming a fluorescent complex between zirconium and 3-hydroxyflavone in a sulfuric acid solution, emitting blue fluorescence under ultraviolet light. The fluorescence intensity is directly proportional to zirconium concentration, enabling a quantitative analysis.
Sánchez et al. explored Ferron (8-hydroxy-7-iodo-quinoline-sulfonic acid,
Figure 9b) in
-cyclodextrin under acidic conditions to detect zirconium at trace levels [
178]. Encapsulation within cyclodextrin enhances fluorescence by shielding the excited species from quenching and nonradiative decay processes [
183]. The hydrophobic cavity of cyclodextrin favors cation complexation, with Zr
4+ complexation enhancing fluorescence, achieving a detection limit of 0.8 µM.
Mahapatra et al. introduced RhPT (
Figure 9c), a rhodamine-based chemosensor, for detecting Zr
4+ ions [
174]. Upon zirconium binding, RhPT undergoes a structural shift from a spirolactam to a ring-opened form, which activates a delocalized xanthene tautomer within the rhodamine group. This transformation greatly enhances fluorescence and changes the naked-eye color from colorless to pink. The process is reversible, as demonstrated by the disappearance of the fluorescence upon the addition of excess EDTA. RhPT shows promise for live cell imaging, making it suitable for real-time monitoring of zirconium within complex biological systems. Sutariya et al. present a calix[4]arene-based fluorescent sensor (
Figure 9d) specifically designed for the selective detection of Zr
4+ and Fe
2+ ions, thanks to its naphthalene units [
175]. This sensor shows a significant fluorescence enhancement upon complexation with Zr
4+, while complexation with Fe
2+ inhibits fluorescence. In addition, other tested ions (Nd
3+, La
3+, Fe
3+, Pr
3+, Ce
3+, Zn
2+, Cd
2+, Mn
2+, Ca
2+, Ba
2+, Co
2+, Hg
2+, Ni
2+, Pb
2+, Sr
2+, Cu
2+, Li
+, Ag
+, Na
+, K
+, As
3+) have no effect on the fluorescence. Selva-Kumar and Ashok-Kumar introduced a phenanthroline-based fluorescent probe (
Figure 9e) designed for detecting Zr
4+ in aqueous media [
179]. This probe selectively binds zirconium ions with a 1:2 stoichiometry (probe:Zr). It exhibits an increase in absorbance at 412 nm upon interaction with Zr
4+, accompanied by significant fluorescence enhancement via the PeT process.
Meng et al. developed a fluorescence turn-on probe for detecting zirconium ions using two complementary DNA strands [
176]. Each strand is modified with pyrene on one end (3
′ or 5
′) and a phosphate group on the other. Upon binding with Zr
4+, these oligonucleotides form a hairpin structure, bringing the pyrene molecules into close proximity and generating an excimer fluorescence signal. The introduction of a cyclodextrin further amplifies the fluorescence signal, enhancing the sensitivity of the probe, which achieves a detection limit of 2 ×
nM. The probe exhibits high selectivity for Zr
4+ over other metal ions, making it suitable for environmental and industrial applications.
A cobalt-based metal-organic framework was developed by Kirandeep et al. using a mixed-ligand approach that incorporates both N,N’-donor and polycarboxylate acid ligands to increase the interaction with the cations [
180]. This MOF acts as a turn-on fluorescent sensor for Zr
4+ via the absorbance-caused enhancement mechanism, demonstrating high selectivity and sensitivity with a detection limit of 67 nM. Moreover, MOF1 shows promise as a selective adsorbent for organic dyes, specifically Reactive Black 5 and Orange G. Chen et al. introduce a reusable Eu-based coordination polymer probe for Zr
4+ detection, formulated as [Eu(L)
1.5(phen)(H
2O)] [
181]. This probe is composed of 9,10-anthracenedicarboxylic acid and 1,10-phenanthroline, resulting in a complex with strong blue–violet fluorescence emission. The highly selective interaction with Zr
4+ leads to fluorescence quenching, attributed to static weak interactions. Recently, Liao et al. developed fluorescent carbon quantum dots synthesized from o-phenylenediamine and L-cysteine [
182]. These quantum dots exhibit high selectivity and sensitivity in detecting zirconium ions, with fluorescence quenching upon Zr
4+ interaction. Additionally, they show a reversible pH response, with fluorescence quenching in acidic conditions (pH 1–5) and restoration in neutral or basic environments, making them suitable for pH-sensing applications.
Despite zirconium’s low toxicity, several fluorescent probes have been developed for its detection. Early systems such as 3-hydroxyflavone and Ferron operated in strongly acidic conditions and achieved only micromolar sensitivity, whereas modern probes demonstrate nanomolar detection in more practical matrices. The calixarene–naphthalene sensor offers the best sensitivity (1.4 nM) in river water, while phenanthroline (9 nM) and Co-MOF (67 nM) also perform well in aqueous environments. Carbon quantum dots combine good sensitivity (68 nM) with a broad pH tolerance and live-cell imaging capability. Importantly, the Eu-based coordination polymer achieves 200 nM detection limits while maintaining stability across pH 1–8, making it a strong candidate for reusable sensing platforms. Collectively, these examples show that zirconium probes can combine high sensitivity with adaptability to diverse matrices, supporting their potential in environmental monitoring, industrial safety, and biological applications.
3.6. Beryllium
Recognized for its exceptional physical properties, beryllium has been widely used in electronics and aerospace since the mid-20th century, owing to its high conductivity and thermal stability, and for its low density. Moreover, beryllium finds numerous applications in the nuclear industry. Thanks to its high neutron scattering cross section, it serves as a neutron reflector in nuclear reactors, enhancing the efficiency of reactions. Additionally, beryllium oxide acts as a neutron moderator, playing a crucial role in the control and regulation of nuclear reactions within the reactor core.
It is important to note that beryllium is highly toxic, posing significant health risks [
184,
185]. Classified as a carcinogenic element, it can lead to the development of chronic beryllium disease. Consequently, stringent measures must be implemented in industries dealing with beryllium to safeguard the health of employees. The development of fluorophores to monitor beryllium started in the 1950s, as scientists suspected an impact of beryllium on human health.
Morin (2′,3,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) emits a yellow-green fluorescence when it is complexed with beryllium in an alkaline solution [
186], with the highest sensitivity at 0.2 M NaOH [
187]. But Morin seems not to be selective since zinc, calcium, and lithium interfere with beryllium [
188]. Additionally, three different complexes can form between beryllium and morin (M): BeM, Be
2M, and Be
2M
2, depending on the pH, making it a complicated system for fluorescence detection [
189].
The compound 10-hydroxybenzo[
h]quinoline (HBQ) features a strong hydrogen bond between the hydroxy group and benzoquinolinic nitrogen. Owing to its
-electron system, it displays significant fluorescence [
190,
191,
192,
193]. The excitation of the fluorophore in its enol form induces the keto form through tautomerism with proton transfer (ESIPT process) from the hydroxy oxygen to the benzoquinolinic nitrogen. Subsequently, the excited-state keto form emits fluorescence before returning to the enol form through a reverse proton transfer. HBQ can also form a six-membered chelate ring with Be(II) by replacing the proton, causing a one-hundred-nanometer shift in the fluorescence emission maxima by inhibiting the ESIPT process. As HBQ is not soluble in water, its sulfonate derivative, HBQS (10-hydroxybenzo[
h]quinoline-7-sulfonate), demonstrates good water solubility, making it a good probe for beryllium detection in solution (
Figure 10).
Matsumiya et al. first developed an urban air analysis method using the fluorescence technique with HBQS in 2001 [
194]. Following filter dissolution with nitric acid, beryllium is quantified in an alkaline solution (pH 12) through complexation with HBQS at a molar ratio of 1:1. The method achieved an LOD of 5 pg/cm
3. Another method was developed to detect beryllium on surfaces using a filter-swiping technique [
195]. Beryllium on the swipe is dissolved with ammonium bifluoride, before the addition of a detection solution, containing HBQS, EDTA as a masking agent, and L-lysine as buffer at pH 12.85. Building upon this approach, a portable fluorescence method has been established for the analysis of air and wipe samples with a limit of detection of 13.6 ng/swipe [
196].
The close proximity between the hydroxy group and the benzoquinolinic nitrogen suggests that beryllium exhibits a high formation constant compared to larger metal cations. Additionally, alkaline conditions can lead to the hydrolysis of certain metal cations. EDTA is employed as a masking agent, given its weak equilibrium constant with Be(II) (10
−3.9) compared to >10
8 for other metal ions [
197]. Consequently, no significant interference was observed from common metal cations, even with a molar excess of 10
5 [
194]. Fe and, to a lesser extent, TiO
2 are the most significant interfering species, primarily due to the presence of hydrolyzed particles in suspension. However, this interference can be avoided by filtering the solution, which may exhibit visible color [
195,
196,
198].
Matsumiya and Hoshino introduced a derivative of HBQ, (2-(2
′-hydroxyphenyl)-10-hydroxybenzo[
h]quinoline), used as a precolumn chelating reagent for beryllium in RP-HPLC [
199]. The eluate is then detected via fluorometry with a detection limit of 39 fg/cm
−3, and it does not present interferences from other metal ions.
HBQ was further functionalized onto a silicon nanopillar surface, onto which a 1 mL aliquot containing beryllium in a basic solution was applied [
200]. Fluorescence emission, observed via microscopy, undergoes a shift when Be(II) is complexed with the Si-HBQ substrate (detection limit is 0.6 pg/cm
−3). The presence of a thin layer of porous silicon oxide on the surface enhances the contact surface area, thereby amplifying fluorescence. The surface can then be rinsed with nitric acid to remove beryllium, enabling reuse of the substrate.
In addition to HBQ derivatives, a few fluorophores have been studied for beryllium detection. 4-methyl-6-acetyl-7-hydroxycoumarin forms a water-insoluble complex with beryllium, which can be extracted into benzene for measuring its fluorescence emission [
201]. The concentration range for Be(II) is 0.5 to 10 ng/mL of benzene. The selectivity of this fluorophore for beryllium is influenced by the presence of citrate, EDTA, Ti, Zr, Hf, Cr, Zn, Sn, Sb, and Bi when their ratio compared to Be exceeds 2. Chromotropic acid and beryllium form a 1:1 complex (pH 4.8–6.0) that emits fluorescence, enabling beryllium detection within the range of 0.1 to 60 ng/cm
−3 with no interferences reported among the sixty anions tested [
202]. 2,6-diphenyl-4-benzo-9-crown-3-pyrane serves as a turn-on fluorescent probe for Be(II) in a MeOH/H
2O (70:30,
v/
v) solution via the PCT process [
203]. It exhibits a low LOD of 2 nM and shows no interference from tested metal ions.
Fluorescent probes for beryllium detection have significantly advanced, starting with Morin in the 1950s, despite its lack of selectivity. More sophisticated fluorophores like HBQ and its derivatives have since emerged, offering high sensitivity, low detection limits, and minimal interference from other metals. These advancements enable reliable beryllium monitoring in diverse environments while addressing its toxicity and environmental persistence.