Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Instance Segmentation in Agriculture: An Optimized YOLOv8 Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Colorimetric Detection of Nitrosamines in Human Serum Albumin Using Cysteine-Capped Gold Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Off-Grid Sparse Bayesian Learning for Channel Estimation and Localization in RIS-Assisted MIMO-OFDM Under NLoS
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

On the Role of Artificial Intelligent Technology for Millimetre-Wave and Terahertz Applications

by
Lida Kouhalvandi
1 and
Ladislau Matekovits
2,3,4,*
1
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Dogus University, 34775 Istanbul, Türkiye
2
Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
3
Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni, National Research Council of Italy, 10129 Turin, Italy
4
Department of Measurements and Optical Electronics, Politehnica University Timişoara, 300006 Timişoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(17), 5502; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175502
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 6 August 2025 / Accepted: 8 August 2025 / Published: 4 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Communication, Sensing and Localization in 6G Systems)

Abstract

Next-generation wireless communication networks are developing across the world day by day; this requires high data rate transportation over the systems. Millimeter-wave (mm-wave) spectrum with terahertz (THz) bands is a promising solution for next-generation systems that are able to meet these requirements effectively. For such networks, designing new waveforms, providing high-quality service, reliability, energy efficiency, and many other specifications are taking on important roles in adapting to high-performance communication systems. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods have proved their effectiveness in predicting. and optimizing nonlinear characteristics of high-dimensional systems with enhanced capability along with rich convergence outcomes. Thus, there is a strong need for the use of these intelligence-based methods to achieve higher bandwidths along with the targeted outcomes in comparison with the traditional designs. In this work, we provide an overview of the recently published works on the utilization of mm-wave and THz frequencies for designing and implementing various designs to carry out the targeted key specifications. Moreover, by considering various newly published works, some open challenges are identified. Hence, we provide our view about these concepts, which will pave the way for readers to get a general overview and ideas around the various mm-wave and THz-based designs with the use of AI methods.

1. Introduction

The need for a new wireless communication technology has been raised due to the widespread use of mobile devices and industrial applications [1,2]. The millimeter-wave (mm-wave) and terahertz (THz) frequencies, which are a subset of electromagnetic (EM) waves [3], are identified as the solution for the next generation in high-end applications such as remodeling telecommunications, imaging, and sensing [4,5]. One of the benefits of these high frequencies is enabling localization performance in an accurate and precise way [6] and they can offer high data rates and low latency [7,8]. At various frequency domains, there are diverse applications (Figure 1 represents the various frequency domains). The mm-wave band frequency ranges from 30 GHz to 300 GHz, and the THz band frequency is from 0.1 to 30 THz [9,10]. As is clear from the depicted figure, the THz bandwidth is large enough for transmitting huge data rates and also appropriate for short-range indoor situations [11].
Recently, various studies have been completed in mm-wave and THz frequency bands, especially combined with their effectiveness in various domains such as analyzing large amounts of data, predicting and deciding on channels, self-organization, and so on [13]. It is anticipated to support high data transmission along with high-bandwidth wireless communications, which need advanced methodologies to support advanced wireless applications. To overcome these challenges, the artificial intelligence (AI) method proves its effectiveness in solving problems with big data [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Hence, this methodology is appropriate enough for optimizing high-dimensional and complex designs and networks with resource management [20]. Thus, recently, various studies have been reported in the domain of mm-wave and THz with the help of AI methodologies. In the following, a short list is reported focusing on the used methods by the different authors. For some of these methods, more detailed presentations are provided in the rest of the paper.
In [21], a multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) radar system operating at mm-wave is introduced, leading to recognition of a gesture. Here, a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on long short-term memory (LSTM) layers is employed. In another study [22], CNN-based bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) is employed as a solution for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, leading to an effective beam alignment. For vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) scenarios, deep learning (DL) becomes a solution for beam selection in [23]. The reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) is one of the successful sixth-generation (6G) technologies for enhancing the overall performance. For this case, in [24], RIS development, along with the utilization of machine learning (ML), is introduced. Federated learning (FL) is also employed in [25] and allows the mm-wave systems to obtain efficient link configuration. As another application of neural network (NN), in [26], this method is employed for predicting the beam signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from channel state information (CSI) achieved at the base station (BS). In [6], DL-based regression models are executed for predicting range and the angle of arrival (AoA).
In [7], the weighted minimum mean square error manifold optimization algorithm is employed for the MIMO orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) transceiver system. This method leads to achieving acceptable spectral efficiency. The mm-wave channel is modeled as a two-state Markov channel in [27], resulting in minimizing the average delay by over 70%. A low-complexity physics-based simulation tool is presented in [28], leading to the training and construction of a network with the mm-wave signal data. In [29], an mm-wave-based unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is presented, which operates beyond the fifth generation (5G). Here, a cost-subsidized multiarmed bandit with double-deep Q-network has introduced results in some solutions in terms of the dynamic UAV path design, power splitting, and device pairing. From another point of view for wireless communication systems, path loss modeling is executed through ML in [30]. The implementation of federated learning is presented in [31] for vehicular mobility scenarios, leading to speeding up the sector selection. The graph neural network (GNN) is used in [32] as a beam selection for ultra-dense device-to-device mm-wave networks. Another use of ML is executed in [33] for the purpose of handover reduction in 5G networks.
As presented, there are various types of NNs with diverse utilization targets. Hence, the implementation of AI methods is growing gradually, and it is expected to have technology such as the ’AI internet of everything’ in 2030 [34]. Due to this importance, this work is devoted to firstly summarizing the various reported works based on AI methods that are executed at mm-wave and THz frequencies. Afterward, the authors discuss a future direction regarding this concept. This work will be useful enough for researchers who desire to consider the practical designs, optimizations, and methodologies operating at mm-wave and THz band frequencies.
The remaining part of this work is as follows. The motivation of this work is presented in Section 2Section 3 and Section 4 present the general definitions of optimization and AI methods, respectively. Section 5 is devoted to summarizing the practical implementation of AI at mm-wave and THz frequencies. Future directions and suggestions of the authors regarding the determined topic are discussed in Section 6. Finally, Section 7 concludes this work.

2. Motivation and Scope of This Work

The new radio concept is developing exponentially and attracting the attention of researchers across the world from industry and academia due to its ability to transfer data at a high rate. Hereby, 5G and 6G technologies operating at mm-wave and THz bandwidths have become a hot topic; they are used for various applications. In this case, in recent years, diverse works with comprehensive surveys have been carried out, and Table 1 at the end of this section presents the reported survey works in which the application of AI at higher bandwidths is reported. By reviewing the table, it is recognized that the current presented work, as opposed to the previously published works, focuses on presenting various employed AI-based methods at high frequencies along with enlightening the presented circuit-level/system-level topologies. The benefits of ML techniques lead to improving the overall performance of various designs in diverse applications, as reported as well. Finally, a comprehensive overview of the future directions that can be pursued in this field is presented in detail.

3. Definition of Optimization

The optimization method is the collection of mathematical principles leading to solving quantitative problems and finding optimal solutions for various conditions. The optimization process can be executed as either single-objective or multi-objective optimizations as defined in (1):
minimize g ( x ) ; g ( x ) R m subject to h ( x ) 0 ; h ( x ) R k x Ω
in which:
  • g ( x ) : Vector with m objective functions;
  • h ( x ) : Vector with k constraints;
  • x: Vector with n design variables within the design space Ω .
The representation for either a single-objective or multi-objective function can be determined by the m factor that, if m = 1, the function is single, else the generated function is multi-objective.
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a common algorithm used in the AI method and can be defined as either a single-objective or a multi-objective method. By constructing the Gaussian process (GP) regression, any given input data defined as x is inserted into the optimization method, and the output parameter defined as f ( x ) is predicted (see Figure 2). The GP presents a Bayesian posterior probability distribution and aims to estimate the new value by paying attention to the current posterior distribution.
For training any kind of NN, firstly, a suitable amount of data is prepared, and after that, the GP model is generated using the maximum a posteriori (MAP) metric as (2),
ω M A P = a r g m a x i = 1 n ρ ( y i f ( x i ; ω ) ) ρ ( ω )
where ρ ( ω ) represents the prior probability with the weighting vector: ω = ( ω 1 , ω 2 , , ω m ) . Also, x and y parameters are defined as input data and predicted output response, respectively. After obtaining the required MAP, the x t = a r g m a x [ E I ( x ) P I ( x ) ] is chosen, where EI is the expected improvement and PI is the probability of improvement.
For the newly inserted input, the new output is estimated through the Gaussian distribution, as presented in (3) and (4), with a kernel function of K ( x , x ) , a mean m ( x ) , and a standard deviation σ ( x ) . In case of not achieving the targeted output, the GP model is updated to achieve the required specifications. Figure 3 presents the performance of GP for estimating the new outputs.
m ( x n + 1 ) = K T [ K + σ n 2 I ] 1 Y
σ 2 ( x n + 1 ) = K ( x n + 1 , x n + 1 ) K T [ K + σ n 2 I ] 1 K

4. Definition of Artificial Intelligence

The AI method aims to mimic human intelligence, which involves ML, NN, and DL subsections. For this method, the BO algorithm is employed to estimate the output specifications for any given input data by reducing the error function (i.e., loss function). As Figure 4 shows, the ML is divided into three subsections: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning (RL). More descriptions regarding each of the learning methods are presented in [47,48].
The structure of any NN can be either a shallow neural network (SNN) or a deep neural network (DNN), including the input layer, hidden layers(s), and output layer. The number of hidden layers will cause the construction of either the SNN or DNN structures. Figure 5 presents the general configuration of DNN, including the input layer, hidden layers, and output layer. Any network can be trained by firstly achieving a suitable amount of data (i.e., training, validation, and testing data), and then by determining the specification(s)/parameter(s) for input and output layers, respectively. The training procedure for networks is described more in [49]. The intelligence-based networks are able to both handle uncertainty and analyze a large amount of data for estimating outcomes [50]. For any reported problems, selecting the appropriate specifications for the input layer, output layer, and the topology of hidden layers can result in accurate predictions and optimizations.

5. Application of AI at mm-Wave and THz Band Frequencies

The AI methods are applicable for analyzing and estimating communication data for various systems and wireless environments. Some of the various AI-based algorithms that can be employed for the systems at mm-wave and THz bandwidths are supervised learning, unsupervised learning, DL, and RL [51]. For this case, this section is devoted to summarizing the various methodologies employed for the various designs at mm-wave and THz frequencies. Table 2 at the end of this section summarizes various types of NNs used in high frequencies.

5.1. Application of AI at mm-Wave

In modern wireless communications, wireless network planning, along with optimizations, is substantial for finding the optimal network deployment. High frequencies, such as the mm-wave frequency bands, are subject to reflections and diffraction effects. The mm-wave frequencies result in increasing bandwidth with the need for highly directional antennas [52]. Recently, ML algorithms have been employed that offer significant advantages for various concerns [53]. This section is devoted to presenting the employed diverse AI-based algorithms at mm-wave frequencies for designing and optimizing networks.
In [54], a methodology for adversarial attacks against the proposed 6G ML is presented that helps in mm-wave beam prediction. Figure 6 presents the diagram for the adversarial training process that is based on DL modeling. Adversarial inputs are generated after the model is constructed, and the model becomes stable when the training is finalized. After this process, the trained model will estimate the radio frequency (RF) beamforming codeword for appropriate users.
In another study [55], the ML method is combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) for finding the network deployment, suitable for 5G wireless systems. The presented method leads to providing at least 95% of the receiver (Rx) point that will be useful enough in the combination of massive MIMO and beam-forming for exposure-aware network planning. For 6G mobile networks [56], the internet of vehicles is an important target, also dealing with green communication. For this case, in [57], the ML method is employed, aiming to improve the energy-efficient concept. Here, the mm-wave channel is modeled by using the 3D ray tracing, which results in reflecting the RF-domain digital twin matching. The presented method, based on the ML method, leads to present connections between the twin network and physical network and helps to improve efficiency and consistency. The ML method is employed in [58] for accelerating the spatial-domain beam prediction, allowing for minimizing the power consumption and the reference signaling overhead. The presented NN includes input specifications as reference signal received powers (RSRPs) and output specifications as P ^ that are the predicted output probability vector of all the beams. The presented network is fully connected, including F nodes.
For calibrating mm-wave on-chip circuits, a methodology, namely a thru-reflect-line NN, is employed in [59], allowing more accuracy and flexibility in comparison with conventional thru-reflect-line methods. This ML-based method estimates the S-parameters of the device under test. This method is validated for calibrating the transmission lines for the whole D-band of 110–170 GHz. In [60], a 5G mm-wave dipole antenna is designed and fabricated, allowing a high gain of 6.7 dBi at 28 GHz. Additionally, a 5G filter with a gain insertion loss lower than 0.6 dB is presented. For the designed phased-array structure, ML with the collaboration of BO is executed in the hybrid beamforming, leading to achieving suitable gains in analog and hybrid beamforming. The general configuration of the antenna with filter is presented in Figure 7.
The DL method is presented as a solution in [61] for achieving the channel state information of mmWave massive MIMO systems. The presented method leads to selecting the appropriate beam from the base station to the user. The type of employed NN is long short-term memory, which allows for selecting the suitable beam. For detecting the mm-wave channel states and scenarios, in [62], a DNN-based approach is presented in which the identification is improved effectively by using the cluster-based features. The effectiveness of the method is verified in both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-LoS (NLoS), which are channel states.
Achieving training data for modeling the mm-wave channel predictors with NN, and also generating an accurate model, faces limitations. For tackling these drawbacks, in [63] an automatic hyperparameter tuning method is employed, which leads to optimizing the training process of the presented CNN method. The ML-based beamforming method is employed in [64], which is executed with the k-nearest neighbors approximation. The approach allows for generating suitable beamforming configurations with respect to the spatial distribution. With this method, a direct mapping is performed, and the beamforming complexity is minimized effectively. The general structure of the presented antenna array is presented in Figure 8.
The supervised learning method is employed in [69] to execute beam sweeping in a low implementation and to perform a binary classification. Here, model training is performed by extracting the features from raw data. Unsupervised learning is executed in [65], leading to the estimation of the beamspace channel for mm-wave MIMOs. This methodology improves the compressive sensing technique successfully.
In RF-based user authentication, there is an important problem of behavior privacy leakage. For this case, a DNN, namely BPCloak, is presented in [66], leading to the erasing of behavioral privacy. This technique has been verified in mm-wave systems. In another study [67], reconfigurable intelligent meta-surfaces (RIMs) are designed to improve the beam steering functionality suitable for 5G communications. Here, the computed vision (CV) system runs the ML method to calculate in real time the coding schemes, which results in achieving the targeted reconfigurable radiation pattern. Additionally, the effectiveness of the GA in achieving the most appropriate radiation pattern for beam steering application is presented. In [68], a new method for sideline-assisted multiple-mode mm-wave scheduling is presented. Forming the multicast clusters would help in reducing the complexity, and the unsupervised learning algorithm helps improve transmit power and bandwidth specifications.
For estimating the future dynamic line of sight link blockages, in [70], DNN is employed, which results in 85% accuracy. In this study, the link blockage status is estimated by the recurrent neural network (RNN), and also the link status with the type and moving direction of the blockage through CNN. The structure of RNN and CNN is depicted in Figure 9, respectively.
Based on the mm-wave radar and ML, in [71], a noncontact carry object detection methodology is presented. Here, a tree-based feature selection method is executed to minimize the complexity and enhance reliability. In another study [72], the DL method is employed, resulting in presenting a solution for precise 5G positioning. The problem is modeled as the combination of non-line-of-sight identification and position estimation. The Markov decision process problem is solved in [73] by learning from the environment along with re-optimizing the caching policy. Here, the RL is employed and trained to generate a change point detection-assisted reinforcement learning algorithm. It is verified that the presented method has a higher convergence speed in comparison with a conventional Q-learning algorithm.
A link adaptation framework for the orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing systems with compressed-sensing-assisted index modulation is presented in [74], in which the methodology is based on the DL. In this work, multi-layer sparse Bayesian learning algorithms with DNN-assisted adaptive modulation algorithms are executed, leading to the accurate optimization of channel knowledge and transmission mode. The mm-wave MIMO system is presented in [75], in which the presented method is based on the DL results in hybrid precoding. The constructed network is CNN, which estimates and optimizes the hybrid precoder and combiner. In another study [76], a new receiver structure, implementing DL at the receiver side, presented results in detecting mm-wave radio-over-fiber signals. This framework outperforms the bit error rate from 10 1 to 10 5 in comparison with the conventional self-homodyning-based approach. The beam training concept is studied in [77] for the MIMO systems. In this work, the DNN is employed for estimating the strongest channel path based on the probability vector, and also, this NN is used for executing beam training tests. The outcomes demonstrate that enhanced signal coverage can be achieved.
In [78], a pre-activated residual NN-based multi-user detection is presented (see Figure 10). The presented network leads to solving the sparse signal recovery problem in massive machine-type communications. The beam prediction NN is presented in [79] for beam management in non-cooperative mm-wave systems. The novelty of this work relies on the execution of fewer training samples in comparison with the conventional methods, in which deep regularized waveform learning is employed. In [80], a deep reinforcement learning method is performed based on the deep deterministic policy gradient methodology. This method is able to comply with channel variations, resulting in improved secrecy capacity of the authorized receiver. Figure 11 presents communication channels with the presented model, leading to outperforming the overall performances, in which the intended recipient refers to BOB and the eavesdropper refers to EVE.
In [81], a CNN classifier method is employed for solving problems such as sensing and localization challenges in indoor scenarios. The general configuration of NN is presented in Figure 12, which includes three CNNs, and batch normalization is executed for all of the convolutional layers. The presented network results in training accuracy of 97.65% and testing accuracy of 96.47%.
The mm-wave radar sensors are also used for gesture recognition. In [82], finger-level gesture recognition with the help of mm-wave radar is presented. In this study, the ML technique is employed, and with this method, the activity detection module and gesture classifier are constructed, resulting in an accuracy of 95%. The detailed description for the configuration of executed CNN is presented in Figure 13.
As previously presented, the RIS system is generally used for mm-wave positioning systems. In [83], a residual convolution network regression is employed for predicting the three-dimensional locations of the mobile users in MIMO systems. The simulation results show an acceptable training accuracy of more than 90%. With the help of mm-wave radar, dynamic gesture recognition is executed in [84], leading to reduced model complexity. Based on the mm-wave radar, a posture classification system through the AI solution is introduced in [85], which uses two types of data: an image dataset along with a spatial coordinate dataset. ϵ -Fuzzy Pareto active learning is employed in [86] for mm-wave MIMO systems, resulting in low complexity with low iteration convergence. Here, hybrid precoding, fully connected with partially connected structures, is taken into account. In another study [87], instead of implementing DNN results in limited training data along with real-time models, broad learning is executed for the problems of beam alignment used for mm-wave cell-free MIMO downlink systems. Mobility management is also another important issue for which, in [88], computer vision is employed for estimating the blockages, leading to the timely performance of the handover. With this method, a 40% improvement is achieved in comparison with the conventional ones. For the mm-wave mobile system, the benefit of GNN is presented in [89], which leads to learning end-to-end hybrid precoding through a parallel proactive optimization network. This type of network includes several graph neural networks that can be generalized across diverse system configurations. In [90], the ML method is executed for estimating the future beams through light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors. This LiDAR-aided beam prediction is able to estimate the optimal beam with 95% accuracy.
In [91], a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based method is executed for estimating the best-performing beam in terms of magnitude for both analog and digital beamforming structures. Due to the recent importance of beam codebooks [92], in [93], NN is trained for translating a codebook into a consistent beamspace. An ML-based cross-entropy (CE) method is employed in [94] for optimizing active and passive beamforming. For network planning with 5G, a highly accurate pass loss estimation is required, and in [95], the ML-based urban canyon is presented. The mm-wave indoor multi-user communications through an ML-based vision-aided beam selection are presented in [96], leading to the selection of an optimal beam.

5.2. Application of AI at THz

The prospective 6G communications need a large bandwidth with massive data rate support. The use of AI and ML methods at THz band frequencies has been reported in various works in recent years, leading to tackling problems in aspects such as channel estimation, beam control, spectrum management, and so on. This section is devoted to presenting the very recently published studies on this issue.
In the telecommunication industry, there are various studies on the development of 6G, especially from the view of the 6G ecosystem [97]. This 6G technology can be executed in various domains, as depicted in Figure 14. The utilization of the THz frequency band for 6G communication has become popular recently due to its high data rate transportation, which is also important for AI science. This new frequency band could be developed for quantum communications as well as predicted in [98]. In [99], the intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) is presented, which operates in the THz frequency band and is able to generate a controllable propagation environment. In this work, the DL-based channel estimation method is introduced by providing a solution for the sparse recovery problem. In another study [100], a framework based on AI is presented, leading to operation at THz bandwidth. This methodology helps in improving base stations and LoS communication. The simulation results demonstrate the 61% improved results in comparison with conventional channel state information. With the help of the DL method, in [101], a methodology for following the IRS reflection coefficients is presented that is useful for THz communication systems. Here, a liquid state machine with an ensemble learning technique for achieving the targeted specification is employed. The THz signal identification is studied in [102], which results in specifying the glass fiber-reinforced polymer, which solves problems in THz nondestructive testing. In this work, various THz signals are classified.
The THz metasurface structures are presented in [103] to link the reflection spectra from low to high frequencies. For this case, a DL method is employed with which inaccessible spectra are predicted with an accuracy of 98.77%. The general configuration of the presented network is depicted in Figure 15. The NN structure involves a generation network and an elimination network, where the first network is used as a generator to manufacture various candidates and the second network is used as an inspector to select the optimum solution.

6. Future Directions About This Concept

As previously introduced, the mm-wave and THz band frequencies are essential for 5G and next-generation networks. These technologies need large antenna arrays at both the transmitter and receiver sides. For this large number of antennas, achieving optimal beams is one of the important challenges. From another point of view, data rates, latency, energy consumption, reliability with security, and scalability are other issues that must be considered in these bandwidth ranges. Based on the summarized works in this manuscript, some of the nominated drawbacks are considered, and solutions are presented. However, what is missing is the use of intelligence-based networks of various types, along with the implementation of multi-objective optimization methods. Implementation of optimization methods can help in achieving the optimal parameters, resulting in the best matching targets [104].
From another point of view, the AI-based network must be trained by paying attention to the hardware constraints, for which a suitable execution environment in terms of power and memory must be provided. Additionally, the appropriate set of data in terms of quality, privacy, and ethical considerations must be satisfied in order to train an accurate network.

6.1. Multi-Objective Optimization

Optimization methods are employed for minimizing and/or maximizing targeted functions. By reviewing recent publications, it can be observed that system-level and circuit-level designs are benefiting greatly from multi-modal optimizations, leading to compact, low-cost, and high-performance structures and specifications. Hence, optimizations can be useful in terms of speeding up the process, improving targeted performances, minimizing errors by employing programming constructs, and arranging collaboration of device-to-device communications. The various optimization methods can also be employed at the output layer section for optimizing the various executed output specifications.
The optimization methods can be divided into three subsections:
  • Algorithms based on animals, plants or insect behaviors (bio-inspired) include:
    • Particle swarm optimization (PSO) [105];
    • Ant colony optimization (ACO) [106];
    • Artificial bee colony (ABC) [107];
    • Artificial fish swarm algorithm (AFSA) [108];
    • Artificial plant optimization algorithm (APOA) [109];
    • Chicken swarm optimization algorithm (CSO) [110];
    • Bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) [111];
    • Firefly algorithm (FA) [112];
    • Fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA) [113];
    • Wolf pack algorithm (WPA) [114];
    • Shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) [115];
    • Cuckoo search algorithm (CSA) [116];
    • Bat algorithm (BA) [117].
  • Algorithms based on human treatments:
    • Harmony search algorithm (HS) [118];
    • Social emotion optimization algorithm (SEOA) [119];
    • Teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) [120].
  • Algorithms based on evolution processes:
    • Genetic algorithm (GA) [121];
    • Gene expression programming (GEP) [122];
    • Evolutionary programming algorithm (EPA) [123];
    • Genetic programming algorithm (GPA) [124];
    • Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) [125];
    • Memetic algorithm (MA) [126];
    • Differential evolution algorithm (DEA) [127].

6.2. Type of NNs

An evolutionary algorithm is an evolutionary AI-based computer application that aims to predict future responses after accurate training [128]. There are various types of networks, as listed below; hence, with respect to the applicability of each one, they can be employed for targeted specifications.
  • Recurrent neural network (RNN) [129];
  • Long short-term memory (LSTM) [130];
  • Gated recurrent unit (GRU) [131];
  • Auto encoder (AE) [132];
  • Denoising AE [133];
  • Markov chain (MC) [134];
  • Deep convolutional network (DCN) [135];
  • Generative adversarial network (GAN) [136];
  • Deep residual convolutional network (DRCN) [137];
  • Support vector machine (SVM) [138];
  • Recurrent neural network (RNN) [139];
  • Transfer learning neural network (TLNN) [140];
  • Reinforcement learning (RL) [141].

6.3. Implementation of Quantum Computing (QC)

Quantum computing (QC) is able to solve complex optimization algorithms in which a large amount of data is processed. As previously disclosed, 6G communication systems require suitable and sufficient data; hence, the QC can be an advanced solution for large band frequency [142]. From another point of view, the implementation of QC will lead to speeding up the training process of ANN, as illustrated in [143,144,145,146].

7. Conclusions

Wireless communication systems can be used in various domains, such as healthcare, finance, transportation, and so on, due to the high data rates and lower latency specifications. The mm-wave and THz bands are promising solutions for 5G and 6G network technologies. Hence, the need for high frequencies in the range of mm-wave and THz bands is increasing exponentially for tackling the problems of increased traffic demands and network capacity. One of the promising methods for overcoming these drawbacks is the implementation of AI methods for developing new communication protocols and designing appropriate circuits for this range of frequencies. In this work, after explaining the definition of AI, various reported studies in the range of mm-wave and THz band frequencies in which AI methods are being used are presented. Additionally, a roadmap for improving concepts related to these high-frequency bands through AI methods is introduced by the authors. Any researcher who reads this work will get a general view about the implementation of networks for various designs at mm-wave and THz frequencies and will be able to select the right one more easily.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.K. and L.M.; methodology, L.K. and L.M.; software, L.K.; validation, L.K. and L.M.; formal analysis, L.M.; investigation, L.M.; resources, L.K.; data curation, L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K.; writing—review and editing, L.M.; visualization, L.K. and L.M.; supervision L.M.; project administration, L.K.; funding acquisition, L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, S.; Zhang, J.; Nauman, A.; Khan, A.; Abbas, K.; Hayat, B. Deep-EERA: DRL-Based Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation in UAV-Empowered Beyond 5G Networks. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2025, 30, 418–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Al-Jumaily, A.; Sali, A.; Riyadh, M.; Wali, S.Q.; Li, L.; Osman, A.F. Machine Learning Modeling for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) Signals From mmWave 5G Signals. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 79648–79658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Cai, R.; Chen, H.; Ma, B.; Wu, Q.; Li, M. Deep neural network-enabled multifunctional switchable terahertz metamaterial devices. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 19868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lambrechts, J.W.; Sinha, S.; Sengupta, K.; Bimana, A.; Kadam, S.; Bhandari, S.; Preez, J.D.; Shao, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, Z.; et al. Intelligent Integrated Circuits and Systems for 5G/6G Telecommunications. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 21402–21419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, M.; Wu, L.; Tao, J. Recent Progress and Comment on Metasurface Devices based on Two-photon 3D Printing. Study Opt. Commun. 2024, 18, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amjad, B.; Ahmed, Q.Z.; Lazaridis, P.I.; Khan, F.A.; Hafeez, M.; Zaharis, Z.D. Deep Learning Approach for Optimal Localization Using an mm-Wave Sensor. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2023, 72, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, K.M.; Chang, H.Y.; Chang, R.Y.; Chung, W.H. Deep Unfolded Hybrid Beamforming in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Aided mmWave MIMO-OFDM Systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2024, 13, 1118–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Na, W.; Kim, N.; Dao, N.N.; Cho, S. Machine Learning-Based Communication Failure Identification Scheme for Directional Industrial IoT Networks. IEEE Syst. J. 2023, 17, 1559–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, J.; Chen, W.; Gong, Y.; Wu, Q.; Lu, G.; Gao, W.; Wang, L.; Li, M.; Wang, H. Highly Efficient Automatic Synthesis of a Millimeter-Wave On-Chip Deformable Spiral Inductor Using a Hybrid Knowledge-Guided and Data-Driven Technique. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023, 42, 4413–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lim, B.; Yun, W.J.; Kim, J.; Ko, Y.C. Joint User Clustering, Beamforming, and Power Allocation for mmWave-NOMA with Imperfect SIC. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 2025–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shafique, K.; Alhassoun, M. Going Beyond a Simple RIS: Trends and Techniques Paving the Path of Future RIS. IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 2024, 5, 256–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lawrence, N.P.; Ng, B.W.H.; Hansen, H.J.; Abbott, D. 5G Terrestrial Networks: Mobility and Coverage—Solution in Three Dimensions. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 8064–8093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abd, R.I.; Findley, D.J.; Kim, K.S. Hydra-RAN Perceptual Networks Architecture: Dual-Functional Communications and Sensing Networks for 6G and Beyond. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 2162–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kibria, M.G.; Nguyen, K.; Villardi, G.P.; Zhao, O.; Ishizu, K.; Kojima, F. Big Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Wireless Networks. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 32328–32338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Q.; Zheng, B.; You, C.; Zhu, L.; Shen, K.; Shao, X.; Mei, W.; Di, B.; Zhang, H.; Basar, E.; et al. Intelligent Surfaces Empowered Wireless Network: Recent Advances and the Road to 6G. Proc. IEEE 2024, 112, 724–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, N.; Jia, Y.; Qian, C.; Chen, H. Pushing the Limits of Metasurface Cloak Using Global Inverse Design. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2202130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qiu, H.; Fang, L.; Xi, R.; Mu, Y.; Xia, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Han, J.; Feng, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Wideband High Gain Lens Antenna Based on Deep Learning Assisted Near-zero Refractive Index Metamaterial. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2025, 182, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, S.k.; Zheng, Z.h.; Meng, W.; Chang, S.s.; Tan, Y.; Chen, L.J.; Fang, X.; Gu, M.; Chen, J.h. Harnessing disordered photonics via multi-task learning towards intelligent four-dimensional light field sensors. PhotoniX 2023, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, O.; Qian, C.; Fan, Z.; Zhu, X.; Chen, H. General Characterization of Intelligent Metasurfaces with Graph Coupling Network. Laser Photonics Rev. 2025, 19, 2400979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Wu, Y.C.; Xia, M.; Wang, R.; Poor, H.V. Machine Intelligence at the Edge with Learning Centric Power Allocation. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 7293–7308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, J.T.; Tseng, Y.H.; Tseng, P.H. A mmWave MIMO Radar-Based Gesture Recognition Using Fusion of Range, Velocity, and Angular Information. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 9124–9134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Benelmir, R.; Bitam, S.; Fowler, S.; Mellouk, A. A Novel mmWave Beam Alignment Approach for Beyond 5G Autonomous Vehicle Networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 1597–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tian, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, Q.; Yang, L. A Personalized Solution for Deep Learning-Based mmWave Beam Selection. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2023, 12, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shen, L.H.; Feng, K.T.; Lee, T.S.; Lin, Y.C.; Lin, S.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chang, S.F. AI-Enabled Unmanned Vehicle-Assisted Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Deployment, Prototyping, Experiments, and Opportunities. IEEE Netw. 2024, 38, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Yang, R.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Huang, Y.; Yang, L. Backdoor Federated Learning-Based mmWave Beam Selection. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2022, 70, 6563–6578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kazemi, P.; Al-Tous, H.; Ponnada, T.; Studer, C.; Tirkkonen, O. Beam SNR Prediction Using Channel Charting. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 13130–13145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yao, G.; Hashemi, M.; Singh, R.; Shroff, N.B. Delay-Optimal Scheduling for Integrated mmWave—Sub-6 GHz Systems with Markovian Blockage Model. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023, 22, 5124–5139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fallah Dizche, A.; Duel-Hallen, A.; Hallen, H. Early Warning of mmWave Signal Blockage Using Diffraction Properties and Machine Learning. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2022, 26, 2944–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gendia, A.; Muta, O.; Hashima, S.; Hatano, K. Energy-Efficient Trajectory Planning with Joint Device Selection and Power Splitting for mmWaves-Enabled UAV-NOMA Networks. IEEE Trans. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw. 2024, 2, 617–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. López-Ramírez, G.A.; Aragón-Zavala, A.; Vargas-Rosales, C. Exploratory Data Analysis for Path Loss Measurements: Unveiling Patterns and Insights Before Machine Learning. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 62279–62295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Salehi, B.; Roy, D.; Gu, J.; Dick, C.; Chowdhury, K. FLASH-and-Prune: Federated Learning for Automated Selection of High-Band mmWave Sectors using Model Pruning. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024, 23, 11655–11669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. He, S.; Xiong, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y.; Ren, J.; Huang, Y. GBLinks: GNN-Based Beam Selection and Link Activation for Ultra-Dense D2D mmWave Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2022, 70, 3451–3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raeisi, M.; Sesay, A.B. Handover Reduction in 5G High-Speed Network Using ML-Assisted User-Centric Channel Allocation. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 84113–84133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything. Available online: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/artificial-intelligence-for-the-internet-of-everything/lawless/978-0-12-817636-8 (accessed on 18 November 2024).
  35. Alsabah, M.; Naser, M.A.; Mahmmod, B.M.; Abdulhussain, S.H.; Eissa, M.R.; Al-Baidhani, A.; Noordin, N.K.; Sait, S.M.; Al-Utaibi, K.A.; Hashim, F. 6G Wireless Communications Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 148191–148243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nor, A.M.; Halunga, S.; Fratu, O. Survey on positioning information assisted mmWave beamforming training. Ad Hoc Netw. 2022, 135, 102947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, Y.; Li, G.; Ge, H.; Wang, F.; Li, L.; Chen, X.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Y. Machine Learning and Application in Terahertz Technology: A Review on Achievements and Future Challenges. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 53761–53776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khan, M.M.; Hossain, S.; Mozumdar, P.; Akter, S.; Ashique, R.H. A review on machine learning and deep learning for various antenna design applications. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pathak, V.; Pandya, R.J.; Bhatia, V.; Lopez, O.A. Qualitative Survey on Artificial Intelligence Integrated Blockchain Approach for 6G and Beyond. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 105935–105981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roy, D.; Salehi, B.; Banou, S.; Mohanti, S.; Reus-Muns, G.; Belgiovine, M.; Ganesh, P.; Dick, C.; Chowdhury, K. Going beyond RF: A survey on how AI-enabled multimodal beamforming will shape the NextG standard. Comput. Netw. 2023, 228, 109729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thillaigovindhan, S.K.; Roslee, M.; Mitani, S.M.I.; Osman, A.F.; Ali, F.Z. A Comprehensive Survey on Machine Learning Methods for Handover Optimization in 5G Networks. Electronics 2024, 13, 3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Drampalou, S.F.; Uzunidis, D.; Vetsos, A.; Miridakis, N.I.; Karkazis, P. A User-Centric Perspective of 6G Networks: A Survey. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 190255–190294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chukhno, N.; Chukhno, O.; Moltchanov, D.; Pizzi, S.; Gaydamaka, A.; Samuylov, A.; Molinaro, A.; Koucheryavy, Y.; Iera, A.; Araniti, G. Models, Methods, and Solutions for Multicasting in 5G/6G mmWave and Sub-THz Systems. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 26, 119–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khoshafa, M.H.; Maraqa, O.; Moualeu, J.M.; Aboagye, S.; Ngatched, T.M.N.; Ahmed, M.H.; Gadallah, Y.; Renzo, M.D. RIS-Assisted Physical Layer Security in Emerging RF and Optical Wireless Communication Systems: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 27, 2156–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kong, H.; Huang, C.; Yu, J.; Shen, X. A Survey of mmWave Radar-Based Sensing in Autonomous Vehicles, Smart Homes and Industry. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2025, 27, 463–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kouhalvandi, L.; Karamzadeh, S. Advances in Non-Contact Human Vital Sign Detection: A Detailed Survey of Radar and Wireless Solutions. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 27833–27851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohri, M.; Rostamizadeh, A.; Talwalkar, A. Foundations of Machine Learning; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  48. Berry, M.W.; Mohamed, A.; Yap, B.W. Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science, 1st ed.; Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  49. Aggarwal, C. Convolutional Neural Networks. In Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 305–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Scholes, M.S. Artificial intelligence and uncertainty. Risk Sci. 2025, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Du, J.; Jiang, C.; Wang, J.; Ren, Y.; Debbah, M. Machine Learning for 6G Wireless Networks: Carrying Forward Enhanced Bandwidth, Massive Access, and Ultrareliable/Low-Latency Service. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2020, 15, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cousik, T.S.; Shah, V.K.; Erpek, T.; Sagduyu, Y.E.; Reed, J.H. Deep Learning for Fast and Reliable Initial Access in AI-Driven 6G mm Wave Networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2022, 11, 5668–5680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pihlajasalo, J.; Korpi, D.; Honkala, M.; Huttunen, J.M.J.; Riihonen, T.; Talvitie, J.; Brihuega, A.; Uusitalo, M.A.; Valkama, M. Deep Learning OFDM Receivers for Improved Power Efficiency and Coverage. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2023, 22, 5518–5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Catak, F.O.; Kuzlu, M.; Catak, E.; Cali, U.; Unal, D. Security concerns on machine learning solutions for 6G networks in mmWave beam prediction. Phys. Commun. 2022, 52, 101626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Santana, Y.H.; Martinez Alonso, R.; Guillen Nieto, G.; Martens, L.; Joseph, W.; Plets, D. 5G mmWave Network Planning Using Machine Learning for Path Loss Estimation. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 3451–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rasti, M.; Taskou, S.K.; Tabassum, H.; Hossain, E. Evolution Toward 6G Multi-Band Wireless Networks: A Resource Management Perspective. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 29, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Z.; Sun, H.; Marine, G.; Wu, H. 6G IoV Networks Driven by RF Digital Twin Modeling. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024, 25, 2976–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khan, M.Q.; Gaber, A.; Parvini, M.; Schulz, P.; Fettweis, G. A Low-Complexity Machine Learning Design for mmWave Beam Prediction. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2024, 13, 1551–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cai, H.; Hu, S.; Huang, X.; Shen, Y. 110–170 GHz On-Chip Calibration Using Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2024, 71, 2057–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nouri, M.; Jafarieh, A.; Behroozi, H.; Mallat, N.K.; Iqbal, A.; Piran, M.J.; Lee, D. A Compact Filter and Dipole Antenna with Its Phased Array Filtenna and ADMM-BO Learning for Use-Case Analog/Hybrid Beamforming in 5G mmWave Communications. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 55990–56007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, K.K. A Deep Learning Framework for Beam Selection and Power Control in Massive MIMO-Millimeter-Wave Communications. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023, 22, 4374–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Geng, S. A DNN-Based Channel State and Scenario Identifications for Millimeter-Wave Communications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 8088–8093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yue, C.; Tang, H.; Yang, J.; Chai, L. A generalized CNN model with automatic hyperparameter tuning for millimeter wave channel prediction. J. Commun. Netw. 2023, 25, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lavdas, S.; Gkonis, P.K.; Zinonos, Z.; Trakadas, P.; Sarakis, L.; Papadopoulos, K. A Machine Learning Adaptive Beamforming Framework for 5G Millimeter Wave Massive MIMO Multicellular Networks. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 91597–91609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. He, H.; Wang, R.; Jin, W.; Jin, S.; Wen, C.K.; Li, G.Y. Beamspace Channel Estimation for Wideband Millimeter-Wave MIMO: A Model-Driven Unsupervised Learning Approach. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2023, 22, 1808–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, J.; Xiao, C.; Cui, K.; Han, J.; Xu, X.; Ren, K. Behavior Privacy Preserving in RF Sensing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023, 20, 784–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Loscrí, V.; Rizza, C.; Benslimane, A.; Vegni, A.M.; Innocenti, E.; Giuliano, R. BEST-RIM: A mmWave Beam Steering Approach Based on Computer Vision-Enhanced Reconfigurable Intelligent Metasurfaces. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 7613–7626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chukhno, N.; Chukhno, O.; Pizzi, S.; Molinaro, A.; Iera, A.; Araniti, G. Beyond Complexity Limits: Machine Learning for Sidelink-Assisted mmWave Multicasting in 6G. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 2024, 70, 1076–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lei, W.; Lu, C.; Huang, Y.; Rao, J.; Xiao, M.; Skoglund, M. Adaptive Beam Sweeping with Supervised Learning. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2022, 11, 2650–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, S.; Alrabeiah, M.; Chakrabarti, C.; Alkhateeb, A. Blockage Prediction Using Wireless Signatures: Deep Learning Enables Real-World Demonstration. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 776–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sonny, A.; Kumar, A.; Cenkeramaddi, L.R. Carry Object Detection Utilizing mmWave Radar Sensors and Ensemble-Based Extra Tree Classifiers on the Edge Computing Systems. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 20137–20149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tedeschini, B.C.; Nicoli, M. Cooperative Deep-Learning Positioning in mmWave 5G-Advanced Networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2023, 41, 3799–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rostampoor, J.; Adve, R.S.; Afana, A.; Ahmed, Y.A.E. CPRL: Change Point Detection and Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Cache Placement Strategies. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024, 72, 2339–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; El-Hajjar, M.; Yang, L.L. Deep Learning Assisted Adaptive Index Modulation for mmWave Communications with Channel Estimation. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 9186–9201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, F.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Shi, H.; Shi, B.; Du, R. Deep Learning Based Joint Hybrid Precoding and Combining Design for mmWave MIMO Systems. IEEE Syst. J. 2024, 18, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Thng, G.H.; Jaward, M.H.; Bakaul, M. Deep Learning Based Phase Noise Tolerant Radio-Over-Fiber Receiver. J. Light. Technol. 2022, 40, 7727–7737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Qi, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.Y. Deep Learning for Beam Training in Millimeter Wave Massive MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Thushan, S.; Ali, S.; Mahmood, N.H.; Rajatheva, N.; Latva-Aho, M. Deep Learning-Based Blind Multiple User Detection for Grant-Free SCMA and MUSA Systems. IEEE Trans. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw. 2023, 1, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Huang, H.; Gui, G.; Gacanin, H.; Yuen, C.; Sari, H.; Adachi, F. Deep Regularized Waveform Learning for Beam Prediction with Limited Samples in Non-Cooperative mmWave Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 9614–9619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Saifaldeen, D.A.; Al-Baseer, A.M.; Ciftler, B.S.; Abdallah, M.M.; Qaraqe, K.A. DRL-Based IRS-Assisted Secure Hybrid Visible Light and mmWave Communications. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 3007–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sonny, A.; Kumar, A.; Cenkeramaddi, L.R. Dynamic Targets Occupancy Status Detection Utilizing mmWave Radar Sensor and Ensemble Machine Learning. IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc. 2024, 5, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ali, A.; Parida, P.; Va, V.; Ni, S.; Nguyen, K.N.; Ng, B.L.; Zhang, J.C. End-to-End Dynamic Gesture Recognition Using MmWave Radar. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 88692–88706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, T.; Pan, C.; Pan, Y.; Ren, H.; Elkashlan, M.; Wang, C.X. Fingerprint-Based mmWave Positioning System Aided by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2023, 12, 1379–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jin, B.; Ma, X.; Hu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Lian, Z.; Wang, B. Gesture-mmWAVE: Compact and Accurate Millimeter-Wave Radar-Based Dynamic Gesture Recognition for Embedded Devices. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 2024, 54, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pratap Singh, Y.; Gupta, A.; Chaudhary, D.; Wajid, M.; Srivastava, A.; Mahajan, P. Hardware Deployable Edge AI Solution for Posture Classification Using mmWave Radar and Low- Computational Machine Learning Model. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 26836–26844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nouri, M.; Behroozi, H.; Bastami, H.; Moradikia, M.; Jafarieh, A.; Abdelhadi, A.; Han, Z. Hybrid Precoding Based on Active Learning for mmWave Massive MIMO Communication Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023, 71, 3043–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W. Incremental Collaborative Beam Alignment for Millimeter Wave Cell-Free MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023, 71, 6377–6390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Al-Quraan, M.M.; Khan, A.R.; Mohjazi, L.; Centeno, A.; Zoha, A.; Imran, M.A. Intelligent Beam Blockage Prediction for Seamless Connectivity in Vision-Aided Next-Generation Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2023, 20, 1937–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, R.; Yang, C.; Han, S.; Wu, J.; Han, S.; Wang, X. Learning End-to-End Hybrid Precoding for Multi-User mmWave Mobile System with GNNs. IEEE Trans. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw. 2024, 2, 978–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jiang, S.; Charan, G.; Alkhateeb, A. LiDAR Aided Future Beam Prediction in Real-World Millimeter Wave V2I Communications. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2023, 12, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shah, S.H.A.; Rangan, S. LSTM-Aided Selective Beam Tracking in Multi-Cell Scenario for mmWave Wireless Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 890–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, B.J.; Tsai, Y.T.; Yang, S.Y.; Liao, S.M.; Hsu, C.M.; Huang, C.C.; Liao, K.C.; Chen, S.Y. Dynamic Programming-Based Beam Codebook Design for mmWave Multi-antenna Module in Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Glasgow, UK, 17–22 March 2024; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dreifuerst, R.M.; Heath, R.W. Machine Learning Codebook Design for Initial Access and CSI Type-II Feedback in Sub-6-GHz 5G NR. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 6411–6424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yan, W.; Sun, G.; Hao, W.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, Z.; Xiao, P. Machine Learning-Based Beamforming Design for Millimeter Wave IRS Communications with Discrete Phase Shifters. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2022, 11, 2467–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gupta, A.; Du, J.; Chizhik, D.; Valenzuela, R.A.; Sellathurai, M. Machine Learning-Based Urban Canyon Path Loss Prediction Using 28 GHz Manhattan Measurements. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 4096–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ahn, H.; Orikumhi, I.; Kang, J.; Park, H.; Jwa, H.; Na, J.; Kim, S. Machine Learning-Based Vision-Aided Beam Selection for mmWave Multiuser MISO System. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2022, 11, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bhat, J.R.; Alqahtani, S.A. 6G Ecosystem: Current Status and Future Perspective. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 43134–43167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khan, L.U.; Yaqoob, I.; Imran, M.; Han, Z.; Hong, C.S. 6G Wireless Systems: A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 147029–147044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, Z.; Chen, Z.; Ma, X.; Chen, W. Channel Estimation for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Enabled Terahertz MIMO Systems: A Deep Learning Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops), Online, 9–11 August 2020; pp. 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chaccour, C.; Saad, W.; Debbah, M.; Poor, H.V. Joint Sensing, Communication, and AI: A Trifecta for Resilient THz User Experiences. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 11444–11460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zarini, H.; Gholipoor, N.; Mili, M.R.; Rasti, M.; Tabassum, H.; Hossain, E. Liquid State Machine-Empowered Reflection Tracking in RIS-Aided THz Communications. In Proceedings of the GLOBECOM 2022—2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 4–8 December 2022; pp. 5273–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L. THz Signal Identification for Intelligent Characterization Under High-Resolution Mode based on RFECNet. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD), Xi’an, China, 2–4 November 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chen, J.; Qian, C.; Zhang, J.; Jia, Y.; Chen, H. Correlating metasurface spectra with a generation-elimination framework. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, K.; Xue, Q.; Zhao, D.; Feng, J. Intelligent Forward-Wave Amplifier Design with Deep Learning and Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 3568–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kishore, K.K.; Suman, J.V.; Mallam, M.; Hema, M.; Guntreddi, V. Scrambled UFMC and OFDM Techniques with APSK Modulation in 5G Networks Using Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 104091–104101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhu, W.; Yang, X.; Wu, T.; Qiu, Y. A Routing Algorithm for Underwater Acoustic– Optical Hybrid Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Intelligent Ant Colony Optimization and Energy-Flexible Global Optimal Path Selection. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 17116–17126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ye, B.; Hu, J.; Zha, W.; Wang, B.; Gao, Q.; Fang, G.; Dwivedi, A.K.; Liu, S. A Novel Magnetic Spiral Capsule Endoscope Localization Method Based on an Improved Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 1740–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, T.; Yang, F.; Zhang, D.; Zhai, L. Computation Scheduling of Multi-Access Edge Networks Based on the Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 74674–74683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cai, Z.; Jiang, S.; Dong, J.; Tang, S. An Artificial Plant Community Algorithm for the Accurate Range-Free Positioning of Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2023, 23, 2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Osamy, W.; El-Sawy, A.A.; Salim, A. CSOCA: Chicken Swarm Optimization Based Clustering Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 60676–60688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, F.; Ji, W.; Tan, S.; Xie, Y.; Guo, X.; Liu, H.; Yao, Y. Quantum Bacterial Foraging Optimization: From Theory to MIMO System Designs. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2020, 1, 1632–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Le, T.A.; Yang, X.S. Generalized Firefly Algorithm for Optimal Transmit Beamforming. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 5863–5877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bhatt, R.; Maheshwary, P.; Shukla, P.; Shukla, P.; Shrivastava, M.; Changlani, S. Implementation of Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm (FFOA) to escalate the attacking efficiency of node capture attack in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). Comput. Commun. 2020, 149, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Sun, M.; Song, Z.; Tian, H. Wide Stopband and High Isolation Balanced Diplexer Using Asymmetric Hairpin Ring Resonator Aided by Grey Wolf Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2024, 71, 2931–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Edla, D.R.; Lipare, A.; Cheruku, R.; Kuppili, V. An Efficient Load Balancing of Gateways Using Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm and Novel Fitness Function for WSNs. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 6724–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yang, J.; Xia, Y. Coverage and Routing Optimization of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Improved Cuckoo Algorithm. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 39564–39577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shao, Z.; Qiu, L.F.; Zhang, Y.P. Design of Wideband Differentially Fed Multilayer Stacked Patch Antennas Based on Bat Algorithm. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 1172–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Omari, M.; Kaddi, M.; Salameh, K.; Alnoman, A.; Elfatmi, K.; Baarab, F. Enhancing Node Localization Accuracy in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Hybrid Approach Leveraging Bounding Box and Harmony Search. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 86752–86781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ram, G.; Pal, P.S.; Mandal, D.; Kar, R.; Ghosal, S.P. Social emotional optimization algorithm for beamforming of linear antenna arrays. In Proceedings of the TENCON 2014—2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 22–25 October 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tamilarasan, N.; Lenin, S.B.; Mukunthan, P.; Sendhilkumar, N.C. Stochastic ranking improved teaching-learning and adaptive grasshopper optimization algorithm-based clustering scheme for augmenting network lifetime in WSNs. China Commun. 2024, 21, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kam, G.; Chung, K. Guided-Mutation Genetic Algorithm for Mobile IoT Network Relay. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 103720–103734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tijani, I.; Zayed, T. Gene expression programming based mathematical modeling for leak detection of water distribution networks. Measurement 2022, 188, 110611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gonzaga Ferreira, M.V.; Teles Vieira, F.H.; Felix, J.P.; de Souza, D.F.; Pereira Franco, R.A. Application of Evolutionary Algorithm to Allocate Resources in Wireless Networks with Carrier Aggregation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 8–13 July 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jang, J.Y.; Seo, B.; Hwang, Y.J. Optimal Design Method of a Wireless Charging System for HTS Magnets Using a Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2024, 34, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gan, X.; Sun, J.; Gong, D.; Jia, D.; Dai, H.; Zhong, Z. An Adaptive Reference Vector-Based Interval Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2023, 27, 1235–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. de Brito, J.A.G.; Totte, D.R.M.; Silva, F.O.; Junior, J.R.d.P.; Henriques, F.d.R.; Tarrataca, L.; Haddad, D.B.; de Assis, L.S. Memetic algorithm applied to topology control optimization of a wireless sensor network. Wirel. Netw. 2022, 28, 3677–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, Y.; Chen, C.R.; Huang, P.Q.; Wang, K. A new differential evolution algorithm for joint mining decision and resource allocation in a MEC-enabled wireless blockchain network. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 155, 107186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. de Lacy, N.; Ramshaw, M.J.; Kutz, J.N. Integrated Evolutionary Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Joint Learning of Features and Hyperparameters for Optimized, Explainable Machine Learning. Front. Artif. Intell. 2022, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Alsaleh, S.S.; El Bachir Menai, M.; Al-Ahmadi, S. Federated Learning-Based Model to Lightweight IDSs for Heterogeneous IoT Networks: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Future Directions. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 134256–134272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kouhalvandi, L.; Matekovits, L. Hyperparameter Optimization of Long Short-Term Memory-Based Forecasting DNN for Antenna Modeling Through Stochastic Methods. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2022, 21, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nguyen, D.T.A.; Joung, J.; Kang, X. Deep Gated Recurrent Unit-Based 3D Localization for UWB Systems. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 68798–68813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, L. Recognizing Polyps in Wireless Endoscopy Images Using Deep Stacked Auto Encoder with Constraint Image Model in Flexible Medical Sensor Platform. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 60653–60663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, H.; Hu, B.; Xu, S.; Chen, B.; Li, M.; Jiang, B. Feature Fusion Using Stacked Denoising Auto-Encoder and GBDT for Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 114741–114751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Surekha, S.; Rahman, M.Z.U. Spectrum Sensing and Allocation Strategy for IoT Devices Using Continuous-Time Markov Chain-Based Game Theory Model. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2022, 6, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yao, C.; Yang, Y.; Yin, K.; Yang, J. Traffic Anomaly Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Principal Component Analysis and Deep Convolution Neural Network. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 103136–103149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kouhalvandi, L.; Aygun, S.; Matekovits, L.; Najafi, M.H. Radiation Pattern Extrapolation through Generative Adversarial Network. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and INC/USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (AP-S/INC-USNC-URSI), Florence, Italy, 14–19 July 2024; pp. 679–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yao, H.M.; Zhang, H.H.; Jiang, L.; Ng, M. Enhanced Deep Learning Approach for Electromagnetic Forward Modeling of Dielectric Target Within the Wide Frequency Band Using Deep Residual Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2024, 23, 1884–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tarkowski, M.; Kulas, L. RSS-Based DoA Estimation for ESPAR Antennas Using Support Vector Machine. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, Y.; Cai, K.; Meng, D. Probabilistic Approximation of Stochastic Time Series Using Bayesian Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2025, 36, 11664–11671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Huang, L.; Mao, S.; Zheng, W.; Tang, B.; Wang, H.; Wu, Q.; Tang, M.; Xu, Y. A Scalable ANN-Based Large-Signal Model for GaN HEMTs Using Transfer Learning. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Technol. Lett. 2025, 35, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, W.; Wu, H.; Yang, S.; Mei, X.; Han, D.; Marino, M.D.; Li, K.C. LNPP: Logical Neural Path Planning of Mobile Beacon for Ocean Sensor Networks in Uncertain Environments using Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2025, 12, 2606–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Duong, T.Q.; Nguyen, L.D.; Narottama, B.; Ansere, J.A.; Huynh, D.V.; Shin, H. Quantum-Inspired Real-Time Optimization for 6G Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Road Ahead. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 1347–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Duong, T.Q.; Ansere, J.A.; Narottama, B.; Sharma, V.; Dobre, O.A.; Shin, H. Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning for 6G: Fundamentals, Security, Resource Allocations, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2022, 3, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Nguyen, D.H.; Nguyen, X.T.; Jeong, S.G.; Van Chien, T.; Hanzo, L.; Hwang, W.J. Hybrid Quantum Convolutional Neural Network-Aided Pilot Assignment in Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2025, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Innan, N.; Behera, B.K.; Al-Kuwari, S.; Farouk, A. QNN-VRCS: A Quantum Neural Network for Vehicle Road Cooperation Systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2025, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Behera, B.K.; Al-Kuwari, S.; Farouk, A. QSVM-QNN: Quantum Support Vector Machine Based Quantum Neural Network Learning Algorithm for Brain-Computer Interfacing Systems. IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell. 2025, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Demonstration of microwave, mm-wave, and THz wave range frequencies presented in [12].
Figure 1. Demonstration of microwave, mm-wave, and THz wave range frequencies presented in [12].
Sensors 25 05502 g001
Figure 2. BO method that is employed for ANN training [46].
Figure 2. BO method that is employed for ANN training [46].
Sensors 25 05502 g002
Figure 3. The representation of GP model leading to predicting the new outputs for the given input data.
Figure 3. The representation of GP model leading to predicting the new outputs for the given input data.
Sensors 25 05502 g003
Figure 4. Subsections of the ML.
Figure 4. Subsections of the ML.
Sensors 25 05502 g004
Figure 5. General structure description for DNN.
Figure 5. General structure description for DNN.
Sensors 25 05502 g005
Figure 6. A configuration for beamforming codeword adversarial training presented in [54].
Figure 6. A configuration for beamforming codeword adversarial training presented in [54].
Sensors 25 05502 g006
Figure 7. Presented (a) front side and (b) back side of antenna, (c) filter configurations presented in [60].
Figure 7. Presented (a) front side and (b) back side of antenna, (c) filter configurations presented in [60].
Sensors 25 05502 g007
Figure 8. MIMO antenna configuration presented in [64].
Figure 8. MIMO antenna configuration presented in [64].
Sensors 25 05502 g008
Figure 9. (a) RNN and (b) CNN structures presented in [70].
Figure 9. (a) RNN and (b) CNN structures presented in [70].
Sensors 25 05502 g009
Figure 10. A general structure of neural network presented in [78].
Figure 10. A general structure of neural network presented in [78].
Sensors 25 05502 g010
Figure 11. A general view of mm-wave system, modeled by intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRS)-assisted visible light communication (VLC) presented in [80].
Figure 11. A general view of mm-wave system, modeled by intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRS)-assisted visible light communication (VLC) presented in [80].
Sensors 25 05502 g011
Figure 12. CNN-based methodology presented in [81].
Figure 12. CNN-based methodology presented in [81].
Sensors 25 05502 g012
Figure 13. Gesture classification with CNN employed in [82].
Figure 13. Gesture classification with CNN employed in [82].
Sensors 25 05502 g013
Figure 14. Diverse domains of applicability of 6G technology presented in [97].
Figure 14. Diverse domains of applicability of 6G technology presented in [97].
Sensors 25 05502 g014
Figure 15. DL-based network architecture presented in [103]: (a) general network architecture, (b) a process of bidirectional mapping between low-frequency and high-frequency spaces, (c) a detailed description of various constructed layers.
Figure 15. DL-based network architecture presented in [103]: (a) general network architecture, (b) a process of bidirectional mapping between low-frequency and high-frequency spaces, (c) a detailed description of various constructed layers.
Sensors 25 05502 g015
Table 1. Summary of recently published surveys related to AI methods along with optimizations used in mm-wave and THz bandwidths.
Table 1. Summary of recently published surveys related to AI methods along with optimizations used in mm-wave and THz bandwidths.
RefYearContent Description of Each Survey
[35]2021Describing technologies for 6G wireless communications networks with focus on implementing AI methods at mm-wave and THz bandwidths
[36]2022Summarizing mm-wave beamforming training schemes through the ML approaches
[37]2022Summarizing THz detection, imaging techniques and ML methods
[38]2022Explaining ML methods for antenna designs at mm-wave and THz bandwidths
[39]2023Describing the AI-based methods used in blockchain approach at 6G and beyond
[40]2023Presenting the beamforming techniques based on AI methods for mm-wave communications
[41]2024Presenting the ML methods employed for handover optimizations in 5G networks
[42]2024Providing blockchain-based method for dynamic spectrum sharing that can be applied at THz bandwidth by ML approaches
[43]2024Describing optimizations for multicasting in mm-wave and sub-THz networks
[44]2024Summarizing reconfigurable intelligent surface concept for optical systems
[45]2025Providing a summary for mm-wave radar-based sensing approaches and applications in autonomous vehicles, smart homes, and industry
This work2025(1) Summarizing AI-methods applied in mm-wave and THz bandwidths; (2) introducing types of ML methods for various applications; (3) describing the applications of AI technology at circuit level and/or system level; (4) presenting a future direction for the mm-wave- and THz-based systems with the help of various ML approaches.
Table 2. Summary of various types of NNs in recently published works.
Table 2. Summary of various types of NNs in recently published works.
Ref.Target(s)Type of NN
[52]Estimating the best beam for 6G networks in the fastest wayDNN
[53]Improving the network coverage in terms of furthest uplink distancesML-based physical-layer receiver
[54]Presenting a mitigation approach for adversarial attacks in 6G networksAdversarial learning with AI methods
[55]Predicting the path loss at 28 GHz for 5G networksML with GA methods
[56]Selecting network with subchannel allocationDeep reinforcement learning
[57]Presenting energy-efficient method for 6G mobile networkML-based method
[58]Estimating beam at mm-waveML-based method
[59]Presenting high-accuracy on-chip calibration methodThru-reflect-line neural network
[60]Designing high-gain dipole antenna with its array filter-antenna at mm-wave frequenciesAlternating direction method of multipliers and Bayesian optimization
[61]Selecting the suitable beamLong short-term memory (LSTM)-based DNN
[62]Identifying mm-wave channel states and scenariosDNN
[63]Estimating mm-wave channelCNN
[64]Generating suitable beamforming configurations with respect to spatial distribution of throughput demandML based on the k-nearest neighbors
[65]Predicting beam-space channelDNN
[66]Erasing the behavior privacy in radio frequency signalsDNN
[67]Providing an effective beam steering functionality with the help of reconfigurable intelligent meta-surfacesML with GA
[68]A method for side link-assisted multiple-mode mmWave schedulingML
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kouhalvandi, L.; Matekovits, L. On the Role of Artificial Intelligent Technology for Millimetre-Wave and Terahertz Applications. Sensors 2025, 25, 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175502

AMA Style

Kouhalvandi L, Matekovits L. On the Role of Artificial Intelligent Technology for Millimetre-Wave and Terahertz Applications. Sensors. 2025; 25(17):5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175502

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kouhalvandi, Lida, and Ladislau Matekovits. 2025. "On the Role of Artificial Intelligent Technology for Millimetre-Wave and Terahertz Applications" Sensors 25, no. 17: 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175502

APA Style

Kouhalvandi, L., & Matekovits, L. (2025). On the Role of Artificial Intelligent Technology for Millimetre-Wave and Terahertz Applications. Sensors, 25(17), 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175502

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop