Next Article in Journal
Acoustic Comfort Prediction: Integrating Sound Event Detection and Noise Levels from a Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of the Playing Surface on Workload Response in Spanish Professional Male Soccer Players
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Arousal and Valence Values of Emotional States Using Learned, Predesigned, and Deep Visual Features
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multibody Model with Foot-Deformation Approach for Estimating Ground Reaction Forces and Moments and Joint Torques during Level Walking through Optical Motion Capture without Optimization Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impacts of Wearable Resistance Placement on Running Efficiency Assessed by Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study

by
Arunee Promsri
1,2,*,
Siriyakorn Deedphimai
1,
Petradda Promthep
1 and
Chonthicha Champamuang
1
1
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, Thailand
2
Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(13), 4399; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134399
Submission received: 19 June 2024 / Revised: 3 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 July 2024 / Published: 7 July 2024

Abstract

Wearable resistance training is widely applied to enhance running performance, but how different placements of wearable resistance across various body parts influence running efficiency remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the impacts of wearable resistance placement on running efficiency by comparing five running conditions: no load, and an additional 10% load of individual body mass on the trunk, forearms, lower legs, and a combination of these areas. Running efficiency was assessed through biomechanical (spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic) variables using acceleration-based wearable sensors placed on the shoes of 15 recreational male runners (20.3 ± 1.23 years) during treadmill running in a randomized order. The main findings indicate distinct effects of different load distributions on specific spatiotemporal variables (contact time, flight time, and flight ratio, p ≤ 0.001) and kinematic variables (footstrike type, p < 0.001). Specifically, adding loads to the lower legs produces effects similar to running with no load: shorter contact time, longer flight time, and a higher flight ratio compared to other load conditions. Moreover, lower leg loads result in a forefoot strike, unlike the midfoot strike seen in other conditions. These findings suggest that lower leg loads enhance running efficiency more than loads on other parts of the body.
Keywords: wearable resistance training; weight vest; running performance; running gait; RunScribe™ wearable resistance training; weight vest; running performance; running gait; RunScribe™

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Promsri, A.; Deedphimai, S.; Promthep, P.; Champamuang, C. Impacts of Wearable Resistance Placement on Running Efficiency Assessed by Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study. Sensors 2024, 24, 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134399

AMA Style

Promsri A, Deedphimai S, Promthep P, Champamuang C. Impacts of Wearable Resistance Placement on Running Efficiency Assessed by Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study. Sensors. 2024; 24(13):4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Promsri, Arunee, Siriyakorn Deedphimai, Petradda Promthep, and Chonthicha Champamuang. 2024. "Impacts of Wearable Resistance Placement on Running Efficiency Assessed by Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study" Sensors 24, no. 13: 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134399

APA Style

Promsri, A., Deedphimai, S., Promthep, P., & Champamuang, C. (2024). Impacts of Wearable Resistance Placement on Running Efficiency Assessed by Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study. Sensors, 24(13), 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop