Next Article in Journal
A Robust Automated Analog Circuits Classification Involving a Graph Neural Network and a Novel Data Augmentation Strategy
Next Article in Special Issue
SIMUNEO: Control and Monitoring System for Lung Ultrasound Examination and Treatment of Neonatal Pneumothorax and Thoracic Effusion
Previous Article in Journal
Acoustoelectric Effect of Rayleigh and Sezawa Waves in ZnO/Fused Silica Produced by an Inhomogeneous In-Depth Electrical Conductivity Profile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Technologies to Promote Exercise in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 6
10.3390/s23062987
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Rehabilitation Is the Main Topic in Virtual and Augmented Reality and Physical Activity Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

by
Angel Denche-Zamorano
1,
Yeray Rodriguez-Redondo
2,*,
Sabina Barrios-Fernandez
3,
María Mendoza-Muñoz
4,5,
Antonio Castillo-Paredes
6,*,
Jorge Rojo-Ramos
7,
Miguel Angel Garcia-Gordillo
8 and
Jose Carmelo Adsuar
1
1
Promoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain
2
Social Impact and Innovation in Health (InHEALTH), University of Extremadura, 06810 Mérida, Spain
3
Occupation, Participation, Sustainability and Quality of Life (Ability Research Group), Nursing and Occupational Therapy College, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain
4
Research Group on Physical and Health Literacy and Health-Related Quality of Life (PHYQOL), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain
5
Departamento de Desporto e Sauúde, Escola de Sauúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Eúvora, 7004-516 Eúvora, Portugal
6
Grupo AFySE, Investigación en Actividad Física y Salud Escolar, Escuela de Pedagogía en Educación Física, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago 8370040, Chile
7
Physical Activity for Education, Performance and Health, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain
8
Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3467987, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(6), 2987; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062987
Submission received: 8 February 2023 / Revised: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 28 February 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Virtual and Augmented Reality Systems for Health and Clinical Assessment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Researchers’ interest in finding practical applications for virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies has increased as new devices have become cheaper and more accessible, being used in entertainment, healthcare, and rehabilitation fields, among others. This study aims to provide an overview of the current state of scientific literature related to VR, AR, and physical activity (PA). A bibliometric analysis of studies published between 1994 and 2022 was conducted using The Web of Science (WoS), applying the traditional bibliometric laws and using the VOSviewer software for data and metadata processing. The results revealed an exponential increase in scientific production between 2009 and 2021 (R2 = 94%). The United States (USA) was the country/region with the most relevant co-authorship networks (72 papers); the most prolific author was Kerstin Witte, and the most prominent was Richard Kulpa. The most productive journal’s core was composed of high-impact and open access journals. A great thematic diversity was found according to the most used keywords by the co-authors, highlighting concepts such as rehabilitation, cognition, training, and obesity. Then, the research related to this topic is in an exponential development phase, with great interest in the rehabilitation and sports sciences fields.

1. Introduction

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies engage a trillion-dollar industry, expected to keep growing in future years [1], attracting companies and investors worldwide [2]. The number of mobile AR device users has increased in recent years, from an estimated 200 million in 2015 to almost one billion users by 2022 [3]. On the one hand, VR enables the user to explore and manipulate real or artificial computer-generated three-dimensional multimedia sensory environments in real time [4]. VR is classified as non-immersive VR, which creates computer-generated virtual environments, with users being aware and controlling their physical environment; these systems are experienced on a screen or videogame console, with keyboards, mice, and/or controllers being used as input devices [5]. Semi-immersive VR generates partially virtual environments where users perceive who is in a different reality focusing on the digital image, while maintaining the link with its physical environment; the immersion is achieved using sensors, displaying powerful graphics, although sometimes, digital media are combined with replicas or physical environments to enhance the immersion [3]. Lastly, immersive VR offers a more realistic simulation experience with image and sound; it requires VR glasses that often split the screen, creating a stereoscopic 3D effect, combined with an input track to establish a believable experience [6]. On the other hand, AR [7] offers an experience which allows for the application of virtual elements in the real world [8].
Both VR and AR are becoming increasingly popular and accessible to users and practitioners, and new forms of utilities are emerging [9]. In addition to the entertainment area, VR and AR applications are transforming healthcare [10], medicine [11], rehabilitation [12,13,14,15], and patient education [16] by providing new and innovative solutions to long-standing challenges. VR is being used in medical education to simulate surgeries and other procedures in a safe and controlled environment, allowing students to gain hands-on experience and build confidence before working on real patients [17]. AR is being used to help patients with physical rehabilitation, allowing them to perform virtual exercises and track their progress in real-time [18]. For instance, a study found that AR-assisted therapy can improve upper limb function in stroke survivors, leading to faster recovery and a reduction in rehabilitation time [19]. VR and AR are also being used to manage pain and anxiety in patients, including dental phobia [20] or helping to manage pain and anxiety levels in patients undergoing medical procedures [21]. Moreover, immersive environments provide instant feedback on users’ actions, generating propitious settings for motor learning achievements [22,23,24,25,26]. VR-based games generate controlled environments that are not easily controllable and quantifiable in the real world, offering the possibility to assess and enhance cognitive and motor rehabilitation [22]. These technologies are also useful in behavioural treatments, users’ education, or follow-up [27]. Moreover, VR has shown some benefits in pathologies such as Parkinson’s disease [12,28,29,30], dementia [31,32], and stroke [33]. VR has also been used in the ageing processes [34,35], providing a balanced interaction between sensorimotor function and cognitive demands [22], being used for balance, fall prevention [36], and kinesiophobia, as it provides gradual exposure to physical challenges [37]. Thus, stroke survivors experienced benefits related to enjoyment and engagement, compared to the treadmill as well as in psychiatric symptomatology [38]. Patients attending cardiac rehabilitation services [39,40,41] and with pulmonary diseases [42,43] reached more positive outcomes, together with other treatments, with these technologies being complementary tools for physical training that improve motivation.
Furthermore, these technologies promote physical activity (PA), increasing their popularity during the COVID-19 confinement, when PA could not be performed collectively or outdoors [44]. VR and AR play an important role in healthy habits behaviour promotion [45,46], with physical inactivity being a risk factor for non-communicable diseases worldwide [47,48,49]. Then, outdoor PA practice may be affected by environmental and social factors [50], so indoor or home-based alternatives could be provided [51], with VR and AR technologies offering the opportunity and motivation to engage in physical exercise [48,52,53]. Some AR and VR applications have demonstrated positive outcomes regarding the PA level [54,55]. For this purpose, VR has been used in healthy individuals [48] and in those with pathologies [39,56,57,58,59], as well as with different age groups [54,60], as active video games produce an energy expenditure equivalent to mild to moderate intensity PA [46].
Although bibliometric studies on RV- and RA-related publications exist in the scientific literature [10,61,62,63], to our knowledge, no scientific mapping of the scientific literature related to VR, VA, and PA has been performed. This study is the first to analyse research trends and new topics of interest to researchers in this field, considering the annual publications trend, the most prolific and cited journals, the most productive and prominent authors, the most cited articles, and the most used keywords by authors, with these being the objectives of this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Data

A descriptive bibliometric analysis was conducted to map the scientific research published on VR, AR, and PA in journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS), the most widely used source for bibliometric analysis, given the large number of journals indexed and the complete information provided on the publications: co-authors, titles, abstracts, keywords, sources, publishers, affiliations, citations, etc. [64,65,66,67]. Thus, a search was carried out on 5 September 2022 in the WoS Core Collection database, with the following search vector: (ti = (“virtual reality”) or ti = (“augmented reality”)) and (ti = (sport) or ti = (sports) or ti = (“physical exercise”) or ti = (“physical training”) or ti = (“physical fitness”) or ti = (“physical activit*”) or ab = (sport) or ab = (sports) or ab = (“physical exercise”) or ab = (“physical training”) or ab = (“physical fitness”) or ab = (“physical activit*”) or ak = (sport) or ak = (sports) or ak = (“physical exercise”) or ak = (“physical training”) or ak = (“physical fitness”) or ak = (“physical activit*”)); restricted to: (1) The Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded), The Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), and The Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) editions; and (2) to primary research and reviews. The tags used for the searches were TI (title searches), AB (abstract searches), and AK (author keywords search). Data were extracted from The WoS in .xslx and plain text formats and analysed using Microsoft® Excel® for Microsoft 365 MSO version 2206 and the VoSViewer software.

2.2. Data Analysis

A descriptive analysis of the annual publications was performed, checking their trend and whether they were in an exponential growth phase analysed with the coefficient of determination (R2), using DeSolla Price’s law of Exponential Growth of Science [68,69]. The WoS analyse reports tool was used to conduct a descriptive analysis of the subject categories in which the papers were included. Bradford’s law of science concentration was applied to highlight the most productive journals and those accumulating the highest number of citations [70,71,72]. Lotka’s law was applied to identify the most productive co-authors [73]. The Hirsch index (h-index) was used to identify the most prominent co-authors, with the most productive being those with the highest number of citations among the analysed papers [74,75]. The most relevant contributions were considered to be those with h or the highest number of citations, based on the h-index [75,76]. The most relevant author keywords for co-authors were highlighted by applying Zipf’s law to the keywords used in the whole set of studies [77]. Finally, the VoSViewer software was used to generate visualization graphs on the associations between journals, co-authors, countries/regions, papers, and keywords.

3. Results

3.1. Annual Publications Trend

A total of 341 documents (308 primary studies and 33 reviews), published between 1994 and 2022, were found. From 1994 to 2008, there was no continuity in the number of annual publications. Among those years, 2009 was the first with two or more annual publications with exponential growth until 2021 (Figure 1). During 2020 and 2021 (150 papers), the number of publications exceeded all previous years’ publications (120 documents).

3.2. WoS Categories

Documents were categorised into 90 thematic categories in the WoS. It was found that rehabilitation was the category with the most publications (44 documents), followed by sport sciences (40 documents), public environmental occupational health (39 documents), engineering electrical electronic (32 documents), and computer science software engineering (28 documents). Table 1 shows the top five thematic categories and the journals and publishers with the most publications. Other important categories were computer science information systems (19 documents), computer science interdisciplinary applications (19 documents), health care sciences services (19 documents), neurosciences (18 documents), and medical informatics (17 documents).

3.3. Publications Titles

The analysed publications were published in 205 journals, with a publication range between 1 and 12 studies. Bradford’s core was composed of 17 journals, all with four or more publications and accumulating 31.4% of the total number of publications. Table S1 shows the journals with the most publications in every subject area. The most prolific journals were games for health journal, in quartile 1 in the WoS rehabilitation category (12 papers), the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (10 documents), and virtual reality (10 documents). The distribution followed by Bradford’s core (17 journals), Zone I (35 journals), and Zone II (153 journals) conformed to Bradford’s theoretical series, with a −20.7% error ratio, can be consulted in Table S2. According to the number of citations, Bradford’s core was composed of three journals, with 31.3% of the total citations, being the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (4 documents, 943 citations), located in quartile 1 in computer science, cybernetics, and ergonomics; presence-teleoperators and virtual environments (2 documents, 505 citations); and frontiers in robotics and AI (2 documents, 424 citations), indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index in the Robotics-SCI category. Table 2 displays Bradford’s core and Zone I for journals, according to the number of citations. The distribution followed by Bradford’s core (3 journals), Bradford’s zone I (17 journals), and Zone II (185 journals), according to the citations accumulated, was adjusted to Bradford’s theoretical series, with a -13.8% error ratio.

3.4. Most Prolific and Influential Co-Authors

A total of 1356 co-authors were identified, 88.9% with one paper (1205 co-authors), 8.9% with two (110 co-authors), and 3% with three or more (40 co-authors). Applying Lotka’s law, the number of most prolific co-authors was estimated as the 37 co-authors publishing most of the papers. Then, 25 co-authors with four or more papers and 40 co-authors with three or more papers were found, and these were considered the most prolific. Figure 2 displays the 40 most prolific co-authors on the topic, as well as the interactions between them in the publications. The most prolific co-author was Kerstin Witte (7 documents) from Otto von Guericke University (Germany), followed by Richard Kulpa (6 documents) from the University of Rennes (France), Marios Avraamides (5 documents) from the University of Cyprus (Cyprus), and Zan Gao (5 documents) from the University of Minnesota (USA).
After applying the h-index to the 40 most prolific co-authors, 25 co-authors with 27 or more co-citations were considered. Table 3 shows the 25 prominent co-authors, their affiliations, countries/regions, and the number of papers and citations. The most cited were Kiran Ijaz (936 citations) from Macquarie University (Australia) and Mel Slater (401 citations) from the University of Barcelona (Spain).
Figure 3 shows the most prominent co-authors and their relations in the publications, highlighting the co-authors with the highest document number and those with the highest citation number. Figure S1 shows the most prominent co-authors and their interrelations, highlighting the groups of co-authors with more publications.

3.5. Countries/Regions

Publications were co-authored by 53 different countries/regions. The USA was the top country, with the highest number of co-authored papers (72 documents), followed by China (39 documents), Spain (29 documents), England (24 documents), and Germany (24 documents). England (1596 citations) was the country with the highest number of citations, followed by Australia (1360), the USA (1298), Republic of Korea (790), and Spain (648). The USA (17 links), England (14 links), France, Brazil, and Spain (10 links) had the highest number of co-authored links, with other countries/regions. Figure 4 shows the co-authored countries/regions, as well as the links and the clusters between them. A total of four main clusters were found: the red one, formed by 18 countries/regions, led by the USA, together with China, Switzerland, and Australia; the green, formed by 16 countries/regions, led by England, with France, Brazil, and Spain; the blue, formed by six countries/regions, led by Italy, with Germany and Poland; and the yellow one was composed of four countries/regions, led by Canada, with Luxembourg, Scotland, and Slovenia.

3.6. Author Keywords

According to the search terms used in the search, the following were the most used: virtual reality (154 occurrences), physical activity (37 occurrences), augmented reality (30 occurrences), exercise (21 occurrences), or sport/sports (25 occurrences), as well as other terms, such as rehabilitation (19 occurrences), training (16 occurrences), obesity (11 occurrences), and cognition (10 occurrences), were the most frequently used terms. Figure 5 illustrates the most prominent author keywords and how they were interrelated in the analysed papers, revealing three clusters: the red one (13 keywords, including concepts such as dementia, cognition, and attention, together with virtual reality or physical activity), the green (9 keywords, including terms related to rehabilitation, therapy, and obesity), and the blue one (3 keywords: physical fitness, exergame, and head-mounted display). Figure S2 shows the same graph, with colours representing the average publication year and showing the most current keywords.

3.7. Documents

The most relevant documents were the 33 documents with at least 33 citations within the analysed set of contributions (Table S3). The most cited article was “Player Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS) in an Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Platform Describes Motivation and Enjoyment” by Karin Ijaz et al., published in the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction in 2020, with 915 citations, with the following keywords: self-determination theory; active video game; physical-activity; intrinsic motivation; exergames; dance; determinants; information; children; and feedback. Other prominent publications were “A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy” by Albert Rizzo et al. (479 citations) and “Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality” by Mel Slater et al. (401 citations). Figure 6 shows the interrelations between the most relevant publications.

4. Discussion

4.1. Main Findings

To our best knowledge, this is the first study conducting a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on VR, AR, and AP, revealing that the number of annual publications on this topic follows an exponential growth trend, consistent with other bibliometrics with VR as a subject of study [61,63,78]. This proves the great interest in this subject among researchers, institutions, journals, etc., in line with the increase of users, companies, and investors involved with these technologies. The most productive and prolific journals and authors in the field, the most referenced papers, and the most used keywords were also identified.
The first publication on the topic appeared in 1994 [79], but no annual continuity was found until 2009. Subsequently, publications have continued an exponential growth trend, with a high increase from 2020 to 2021. A possible reason for this high growth may be related to the COVID-19 pandemic modifications in people’s lifestyle habits, with an increase in PA studies performed in isolated environments or with less social interaction to increase PA levels, to treat or prevent mental disorders, or to treat pathologies or injuries. The use of these technologies in rehabilitation has been identified in different studies [12,13,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In this line, the WoS category with the highest number of papers was rehabilitation, also including the most productive journal, Games for Health Journal, with the keywords VR, exposure therapy, and obesity. This category included papers such as “The Potential of Virtual Reality and Gaming to Assist Successful Aging with Disability” [80] or “Virtual reality using games for improving physical functioning in older adults: a systematic review” [81], both with more than 100 citations. The second thematic category with the most publications was sport sciences, with the most cited contribution being “Use of Active Video Games to Increase Physical Activity in Children: A (Virtual) Reality?” [46], which analyses the use of video games to promote PA in children. The contributions covered different areas, such as sports, training, visual perception, decision-making in sports, recovery from sports injuries, increasing PA, and motor skills, all related to the most frequent keywords: exercise, PA, training, sports, and physical fitness.
The interest in the topic’s publications was also demonstrated through the high impact factor of the top-producing journals. The three most productive journals were Games for Health Journal, The International Journal of Environmental Research, and Public Health and Virtual Reality, all ranked in the first quartile of their subject categories. Among the 17 journals in Bradford’s Core, 11 had an open access percentage (95%). Therefore, open access seems to be of great importance in the choice of researchers, as the number of publishers was very varied (JMIR Publications, Frontiers Media, Public Library, or Nature Portfolio). In contrast, the most prolific journal presented a very low percentage of open access (1.4%). Thus, researchers have a wide range of prestigious journals to publish in this area. In contrast, the Bradford’s core of the journals by the number of citations was much smaller, including only three journals with the highest number of citations: The International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Presence-teleoperators and Virtual Environments, and Frontiers in Robotics and AI. However, the high volume of citations accumulated by these journals was affected by the publication of the three most cited papers in them. First, “The Player Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS) in an Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Platform Describes Motivation and Enjoyment” [53] aimed to understand why immersive VR was more interesting than a platform with a static user interface. Even though it was recently published (2020), this paper has become one of the most important on VR, being cited in the WoS thematic categories: psychology multidisciplinary (91 papers), educational research (79), psychiatry (78), environmental sciences (74), and public environmental occupational health (66). The study “A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Therapy” [13] tried to provide an overview of the key issues for the understanding of the therapeutic use of VR, being a reference work in the WoS thematic category of rehabilitation (116 papers). Finally, the paper “Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality” [11] examined VR applications, with some evidence being cited in fifty articles from the WoS thematic categories of computer science cybernetics, software engineering, and interdisciplinary applications.
As in previous bibliometric studies on these technologies [10,62,82], the USA was the country with the highest number of publications. However, the most productive author was Kerstin Witte from Germany, with seven papers, although with a low number of citations (36), as her studies have been recently published (2019–2022). The second most prolific co-author, Richard Kulpa (France), who has published on VR and sports performance, accumulated a high number of papers (6) and citations (188), as a reference in this subject, along with another recent co-author, Benoit Bideau, with “Using Virtual Reality to Analyze Sports Performance” being his most cited study [83]. Another group of prolific co-authors (4 papers), Enrico Molinari, Guiseppe Riva, and Monica Baccetta, have published on VR and therapies for the treatment of body image disorders in people with obesity [84,85,86,87], with an average of 60 citations per paper. Despite finding research groups with a high number of publications and connections between researchers from different countries, large groups are not formed yet, and collaboration between groups, institutions, and countries could increase the productivity and effectiveness of the research.

4.2. Practical Applications

VR and AR applications in healthcare, medicine, and rehabilitation are revolutionising the way professionals approach patient care; with their ability to provide immersive, interactive, and engaging experiences, these technologies hold the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs, making them an important area for further research and investment. Moreover, they are becoming essential tools in Biomedicine and Bioengineering because of their ability to provide accurate, interactive, and immersive simulations of biological systems [88]. Thus, these technologies make it possible to deliver home-based assessments and interventions or telehealth, potentially offering cost-effective alternatives in several areas [59,89]. Furthermore, multiple practical applications are also emerging in sports sciences to increase the population’s PA levels through exergames, performance enhancement programs with technical or tactical training applications, and sports injuries recovery. Then, some of the practical implications of this study include that it may enable publishers, journals, and editors to understand the growing state of interest in VR-, AR-, and AP-related research, and the large pool of researchers behind the development of this topic of study. Additionally, it may provide valuable information to researchers on research trends in the field, as well as meeting other researchers and research groups, favouring the identification of relevant authors in different areas, and facilitating opportunities for collaboration and new partnerships and networks.

4.3. Limitations and Future Lines

This research has limitations, which include the fact that, despite using one of the most complete databases and widely used in bibliometric studies (The Web of Science), a publication bias may have occurred (of which, the consequences may include inaccurate analysis of research trends, biased citation analysis, difficulties replicating studies, or misleading indicators of research impact), excluding documents published in journals with lower impact factor or with characteristics different from those indexed in the WoS database. Future research should extend this analysis by including manuscripts from other databases, such as PubMed or Scopus, among others.

5. Conclusions

VR, AR, and PA annual publications showed an exponential growth trend in recent years, including large numbers of researchers, journals, and publishers interested in the topic. The use of VR in rehabilitation was the topic of most interest among researchers. The most productive core of journals consisted of high-impact journals, with most of them published with open access. Games for Health was the most productive journal. The most prolific author was Kerstin Witte, with Richard Kulpa being one of the most prominent. The USA was the most productive country, while England was the country with the highest number of citations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s23062987/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B.-F., Y.R.-R. and A.C.-P.; methodology, A.D.-Z. and J.C.A.; formal analysis, A.D.-Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.-M., Y.R.-R. and J.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, S.B.-F., J.R.-R. and J.C.A.; visualization, A.C.-P. and M.A.G.-G.; supervision, A.D.-Z.; funding acquisition, M.M.-M. and M.A.G.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Open Access Program of Universidad de Las Américas.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Datasets are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The author A.D.-Z. (FPU20/04201) was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport. Grants FPU20/04201 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and, as appropriate, by “European Social Found Investing in your future” or by “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR”. The author M.M.-M. was supported by a grant from the Universities Ministry and the European Union (Next Generation UE) (MS-12). We also thank the Universidad de Las Américas for their support of the open access initiative.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lupinek, J.M.; Yoo, J.; Ohu, E.A.; Bownlee, E. Congruity of Virtual Reality In-Game Advertising. Front. Sports Act. Living 2021, 3, 728749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cipresso, P.; Giglioli, I.A.C.; Raya, M.A.; Riva, G. The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Saeed, A.; Foaud, L.; Fattouh, L. Environments and System Types of Virtual Reality Technology in STEM: A Survey. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kyaw, B.M.; Saxena, N.; Posadzki, P.; Vseteckova, J.; Nikolaou, C.K.; George, P.P.; Divakar, U.; Masiello, I.; Kononowicz, A.A.; Zary, N.; et al. Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e12959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yang, X.; Cheng, P.-Y.; Yang, X. The Impact of Three Types of Virtual Reality Scene on Learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Osaka, Japan, 7–9 December 2017; pp. 322–324. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tatnell, P.; Atorkey, P.; Tzelepis, F. The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Interventions on Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol, Physical Activity and/or Obesity Risk Factors: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Azuma, R.T. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1997, 6, 355–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eckert, M.; Volmerg, J.S.; Friedrich, C.M. Augmented Reality in Medicine: Systematic and Bibliographic Review. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2019, 7, e10967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lemle, E.; Bomkamp, K.; Williams, M.K.; Cutbirth, E. Virtual Reality and the Future of Entertainment. In Two Bit Circus and the Future of Entertainment; SpringerBriefs in Computer Science; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 25–37. ISBN 978-3-319-25791-4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pawassar, C.M.; Tiberius, V. Virtual Reality in Health Care: Bibliometric Analysis. JMIR Serious Games 2021, 9, e32721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Slater, M.; Sanchez-Vives, M.V. Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality. Front. Robot. Ai 2016, 3, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Campo-Prieto, P.; Cancela-Carral, J.M.; Rodriguez-Fuentes, G. Wearable Immersive Virtual Reality Device for Promoting Physical Activity in Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Sensors 2022, 22, 3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rizzo, A.; Kim, G.J. A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Therapy. Presence-Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2005, 14, 119–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thunström, A.O.; Sarajlic Vukovic, I.; Ali, L.; Larson, T.; Steingrimsson, S. Prevalence of Virtual Reality (VR) Games Found through Mental Health Categories on STEAM: A First Look at VR on Commercial Platforms as Tools for Therapy. Nord. J. Psychiatry 2022, 76, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, Z.; Lee, J.E.; McDonough, D.J.; Albers, C. Virtual Reality Exercise as a Coping Strategy for Health and Wellness Promotion in Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pandrangi, V.C.; Gaston, B.; Appelbaum, N.P.; Albuquerque, F.C.; Levy, M.M.; Larson, R.A. The Application of Virtual Reality in Patient Education. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2019, 59, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, K.S.; Cheng, D.L.; Mi, E.; Greenberg, P.B. Augmented Reality in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Can. Med. Educ. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Phan, H.L.; Le, T.H.; Lim, J.M.; Hwang, C.H.; Koo, K. Effectiveness of Augmented Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bui, J.; Luauté, J.; Farnè, A. Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients with Virtual Reality: A Mini Review. Front. Virtual Real. 2021, 2, 595771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gujjar, K.R.; van Wijk, A.; Sharma, R.; de Jongh, A. Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Dental Phobia: A Controlled Feasibility Study. Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 2018, 46, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Indovina, P.; Barone, D.; Gallo, L.; Chirico, A.; De Pietro, G.; Giordano, A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress during Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin. J. Pain 2018, 34, 858–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lange, B.S.; Requejo, P.; Flynn, S.M.; Rizzo, A.; Valero-Cuevas, F.J.; Baker, L.; Winstein, C. The Potential of Virtual Reality and Gaming to Assist Successful Aging with Disability. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 21, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Laver, K.E.; George, S.; Thomas, S.; Deutsch, J.E.; Crotty, M. Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD008349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Miller, K.J.; Adair, B.S.; Pearce, A.J.; Said, C.M.; Ozanne, E.; Morris, M.M. Effectiveness and Feasibility of Virtual Reality and Gaming System Use at Home by Older Adults for Enabling Physical Activity to Improve Health-Related Domains: A Systematic Review. Age Ageing 2014, 43, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Peng, W.; Crouse, J.C.; Lin, J.-H. Using Active Video Games for Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review of the Current State of Research. Health Educ. Behav. Off. Publ. Soc. Public Health Educ. 2013, 40, 171–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Taylor, M.J.D.; McCormick, D.; Shawis, T.; Impson, R.; Griffin, M. Activity-Promoting Gaming Systems in Exercise and Rehabilitation. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2011, 48, 1171–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, L.; Yu, F.; Shi, D.; Shi, J.; Tian, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Q. Application of Virtual Reality Technology in Clinical Medicine. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 3867–3880. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Tunur, T.; DeBlois, A.; Yates-Horton, E.; Rickford, K.; Columna, L.A. Augmented Reality-Based Dance Intervention for Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot Study. Disabil. Health J. 2020, 13, 100848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Tella, S.; Isernia, S.; Pagliari, C.; Jonsdottir, J.; Castiglioni, C.; Gindri, P.; Gramigna, C.; Canobbio, S.; Salza, M.; Molteni, F.; et al. A Multidimensional Virtual Reality Neurorehabilitation Approach to Improve Functional Memory: Who Is the Ideal Candidate? Front. Neurol. 2021, 11, 618330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cornejo Thumm, P.; Giladi, N.; Hausdorff, J.M.; Mirelman, A. Tele-Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality A Case Report on the Simultaneous, Remote Training of Two Patients with Parkinson Disease. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2021, 100, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McEwen, D.; Taillon-Hobson, A.; Bilodeau, M.; Sveistrup, H.; Finestone, H. Two-Week Virtual Reality Training for Dementia: Single-Case Feasibility Study. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2014, 51, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Eisapour, M.; Cao, S.; Boger, J. Participatory Design and Evaluation of Virtual Reality Games to Promote Engagement in Physical Activity for People Living with Dementia. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 2020, 7, 2055668320913770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vinas-Diz, S.; Sobrido-Prieto, M. Virtual reality for therapeutic purposes in stroke: A systematic review. Neurologia 2016, 31, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Campo-Prieto, P.; Cancela, J.M.; Rodriguez-Fuentes, G. Immersive Virtual Reality as Physical Therapy in Older Adults: Present or Future (Systematic Review). Virtual Real. 2021, 25, 801–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ku, J.; Kim, Y.J.; Cho, S.; Lim, T.; Lee, H.S.; Kang, Y.J. Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality System for Balance and Mobility Rehabilitation in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2019, 22, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Campo-Prieto, P.; Cancela-Carral, J.M.; Alsina-Rey, B.; Rodriguez-Fuentes, G. Immersive Virtual Reality as a Novel Physical Therapy Approach for Nonagenarians: Usability and Effects on Balance Outcomes of a Game-Based Exercise Program. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hennessy, R.W.; Rumble, D.; Christian, M.; Brown, D.A.; Trost, Z. A Graded Exposure, Locomotion-Enabled Virtual Reality App During Walking and Reaching for Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cohort Gaming Design. Jmir Serious Games 2020, 8, e17799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, R.-G.; Tien, S.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-Y. Development Of An Augmented Reality-Oriented Game System For Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment. Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis Commun. 2012, 24, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garcia-Bravo, S.; Cuesta-Gomez, A.; Campuzano-Ruiz, R.; Jesus Lopez-Navas, M.; Dominguez-Paniagua, J.; Araujo-Narvaez, A.; Barrenada-Copete, E.; Garcia-Bravo, C.; Florez-Garcia, M.; Botas-Rodriguez, J.; et al. Virtual Reality and Video Games in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. A Systematic Review. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021, 43, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garcia-Bravo, S.; Cano-de-la-Cuerda, R.; Dominguez-Paniagua, J.; Campuzano-Ruiz, R.; Barrenada-Copete, E.; Jesus Lopez-Navas, M.; Araujo-Narvaez, A.; Garcia-Bravo, C.; Florez-Garcia, M.; Botas-Rodriguez, J.; et al. Effects of Virtual Reality on Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs for Ischemic Heart Disease: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vieira, A.; Melo, C.; Machado, J.; Gabriel, J. Virtual Reality Exercise on a Home-Based Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, Effect on Executive Function, Quality of Life and Depression, Anxiety and Stress: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2018, 13, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rutkowski, S.; Rutkowska, A.; Kiper, P.; Jastrzebski, D.; Racheniuk, H.; Turolla, A.; Szczegielniak, J.; Casaburi, R. Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2020, 15, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rutkowski, S.; Rutkowska, A.; Jastrzebski, D.; Racheniuk, H.; Pawelczyk, W.; Szczegielniak, J. Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation on Physical Fitness in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J. Hum. Kinet. 2019, 69, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Demers, M.; Martinie, O.; Winstein, C.; Robert, M.T. Active Video Games and Low-Cost Virtual Reality: An Ideal Therapeutic Modality for Children With Physical Disabilities During a Global Pandemic. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 601898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ahn, S.J.; Fox, J. Immersive Virtual Environments, Avatars, and Agents for Health. Available online: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-325 (accessed on 23 September 2022).
  46. Foley, L.; Maddison, R. Use of Active Video Games to Increase Physical Activity in Children: A (Virtual) Reality? Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2010, 22, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, I.-M.; Shiroma, E.J.; Lobelo, F.; Puska, P.; Blair, S.N.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Effect of Physical Inactivity on Major Non-Communicable Diseases Worldwide: An Analysis of Burden of Disease and Life Expectancy. Lancet 2012, 380, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ng, Y.-L.; Ma, F.; Ho, F.K.; Ip, P.; Fu, K. Effectiveness of Virtual and Augmented Reality-Enhanced Exercise on Physical Activity, Psychological Outcomes, and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 99, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Physical Activity. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity (accessed on 23 September 2022).
  50. Salmon, J.; Owen, N.; Crawford, D.; Bauman, A.; Sallis, J.F. Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: A Population-Based Study of Barriers, Enjoyment, and Preference. Health Psychol. 2003, 22, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Parker, K.; Uddin, R.; Ridgers, N.D.; Brown, H.; Veitch, J.; Salmon, J.; Timperio, A.; Sahlqvist, S.; Cassar, S.; Toffoletti, K.; et al. The Use of Digital Platforms for Adults’ and Adolescents’ Physical Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Our Life at Home): Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e23389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Plante, T.G.; Aldridge, A.; Su, D.; Bogdan, R.; Belo, M.; Kahn, K. Does Virtual Reality Enhance the Management of Stress When Paired With Exercise? An Exploratory Study. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2003, 10, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ijaz, K.; Ahmadpour, N.; Wang, Y.; Calvo, R.A. Player Experience of Needs Satisfaction (PENS) in an Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Platform Describes Motivation and Enjoyment. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ni, M.Y.; Hui, R.W.H.; Li, T.K.; Tam, A.H.M.; Choy, L.L.Y.; Ma, K.K.W.; Cheung, F.; Leung, G.M. Augmented Reality Games as a New Class of Physical Activity Interventions? The Impact of Pokemon Go Use and Gaming Intensity on Physical Activity. Games Health J. 2019, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Evans, E.; Naugle, K.E.; Kaleth, A.S.; Arnold, B.; Naugle, K.M. Physical Activity Intensity, Perceived Exertion, and Enjoyment During Head-Mounted Display Virtual Reality Games. Games Health J. 2021, 10, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Moreno, A.; Wall, K.J.; Thangavelu, K.; Craven, L.; Ward, E.; Dissanayaka, N.N. A Systematic Review of the Use of Virtual Reality and Its Effects on Cognition in Individuals with Neurocognitive Disorders. Alzheimers Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 2019, 5, 834–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Brea-Gómez, B.; Torres-Sánchez, I.; Ortiz-Rubio, A.; Calvache-Mateo, A.; Cabrera-Martos, I.; López-López, L.; Valenza, M.C. Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, J.; Loprinzi, P.D.; Ren, Z. The Rehabilitative Effects of Virtual Reality Games on Balance Performance among Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pepera, G.; Karanasiou, E.; Blioumpa, C.; Antoniou, V.; Kalatzis, K.; Lanaras, L.; Batalik, L. Tele-Assessment of Functional Capacity through the Six-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: Validity and Reliability of Repeated Measurements. Sensors 2023, 23, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dermody, G.; Whitehead, L.; Wilson, G.; Glass, C. The Role of Virtual Reality in Improving Health Outcomes for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e17331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Peng, C.; Zhao, M.; He, Q. A Bibliometric Analysis of Virtual Reality in Anatomy Teaching between 1999 and 2022. Front. Educ. 2022, 7, 874406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ali, Q.; Heldal, I.; Helgesen, C.G. A Bibliometric Analysis of Virtual Reality-Aided Vision Therapy. Adv. Inform. Manag. Technol. Healthc. 2022, 295, 526–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rojas-Sánchez, M.A.; Palos-Sánchez, P.R.; Folgado-Fernández, J.A. Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis on Virtual Reality and Education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022, 28, 155–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huang, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; Fan, J.; Zhang, H.; Xu, R.; Li, X.; Yu, S.; Long, L.; et al. A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Web of Science: Current Perspectives and Potential Trends of SMAD7 in Oncology. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 9, 712732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shi, J.; Gao, Y.; Ming, L.; Yang, K.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Shi, S.; Geng, J.; Li, L.; Wu, J.; et al. A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Output on Network Meta-Analysis. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2021, 21, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Gu, Z.; Zhong, H.; Zha, Q.; Yang, L.; Zhu, C.; Chen, E. A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer of Publications on COVID-19. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Price, D.D.S. A General Theory of Bibliometric and Other Cumulative Advantage Processes. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1976, 27, 292–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dobrov, G.M.; Randolph, R.H.; Rauch, W.D. New Options for Team Research via International Computer Networks. Scientometrics 1979, 1, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. DeShazo, J.P.; LaVallie, D.L.; Wolf, F.M. Publication Trends in the Medical Informatics Literature: 20 Years of “Medical Informatics” in MeSH. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2009, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Goffman, W.; Warren, K.S. Dispersion of Papers among Journals Based on a Mathematical Analysis of Two Diverse Medical Literatures. Nature 1969, 221, 1205–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nash-Stewart, C.E.; Kruesi, L.M.; Del Mar, C.B. Does Bradford’s Law of Scattering Predict the Size of the Literature in Cochrane Reviews? J. Med. Libr. Assoc. JMLA 2012, 100, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Kushairi, N.; Ahmi, A. Flipped Classroom in the Second Decade of the Millenia: A Bibliometrics Analysis with Lotka’s Law. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 4401–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yie, K.-Y.; Chien, T.-W.; Chen, C.-H.; Yeh, Y.-T.; Lin, J.-C.J.; Lai, F.-J. Suitability of H- and x-Indices for Evaluating Authors’ Individual Research Achievements in a given Short Period of Years: A Bibliometric Analysis. Medicine 2021, 100, e25016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hirsch, J.E. An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16569–16572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Rodrigues-Santana, L.; Adsuar, J.C.; Denche-Zamorano, Á.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Salazar-Sepúlveda, G.; Contreras-Barraza, N.; Galán-Arroyo, C.; Louro, H. Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Whole Body Electromyostimulation. Biology 2022, 11, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zipf, G.K. Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-0-674-43492-9. [Google Scholar]
  78. Găină, M.-A.; Szalontay, A.S.; Ștefănescu, G.; Bălan, G.G.; Ghiciuc, C.M.; Boloș, A.; Găină, A.-M.; Ștefănescu, C. State-of-the-Art Review on Immersive Virtual Reality Interventions for Colonoscopy-Induced Anxiety and Pain. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Medved, V. Towards a Virtual Reality-Assisted Movement Diagnostics—An Outline. Robotica 1994, 12, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pasco, D. The Potential of Using Virtual Reality Technology in Physical Activity Settings. Quest 2013, 65, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Molina, K.I.; Ricci, N.A.; de Moraes, S.A.; Perracini, M.R. Virtual Reality Using Games for Improving Physical Functioning in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2014, 11, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zhao, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, F.; Mao, R.; Fei, F. Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends on the Application of Virtual Reality in Nursing. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 906715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bideau, B.; Kulpa, R.; Vignais, N.; Brault, S.; Multon, F.; Craig, C. Using Virtual Reality to Analyze Sports Performance. Ieee Comput. Graph. Appl. 2010, 30, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cesa, G.L.; Manzoni, G.M.; Bacchetta, M.; Castelnuovo, G.; Conti, S.; Gaggioli, A.; Mantovani, F.; Molinari, E.; Cardenas-Lopez, G.; Riva, G. Virtual Reality for Enhancing the Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Obesity With Binge Eating Disorder: Randomized Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013, 15, e113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Riva, G.; Bacchetta, M.; Baruffi, M.; Molinari, E. Virtual Reality-Based Multidimensional Therapy for the Treatment of Body Image Disturbances in Obesity: A Controlled Study. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2001, 4, 511–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Riva, G.; Bacchetta, M.; Baruffi, M.; Molinari, E. Virtual-Reality-Based Multidimensional Therapy for the Treatment of Body Image Disturbances in Binge Eating Disorders: A Preliminary Controlled Study. Ieee Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2002, 6, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Manzoni, G.M.; Cesa, G.L.; Bacchetta, M.; Castelnuovo, G.; Conti, S.; Gaggioli, A.; Mantovani, F.; Molinari, E.; Cardenas-Lopez, G.; Riva, G. Virtual Reality-Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Morbid Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Study with 1 Year Follow-Up. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2016, 19, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Beams, R.; Brown, E.; Cheng, W.-C.; Joyner, J.S.; Kim, A.S.; Kontson, K.; Amiras, D.; Baeuerle, T.; Greenleaf, W.; Grossmann, R.J.; et al. Evaluation Challenges for the Application of Extended Reality Devices in Medicine. J. Digit. Imaging 2022, 35, 1409–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Batalik, L.; Filakova, K.; Sladeckova, M.; Dosbaba, F.; Su, J.J.; Pepera, G. The Cost-Effectiveness of Exercise-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Intervention: A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 23 02987 g001 550
Figure 1. Annual publications trend on virtual reality and physical activity. R2: exponential growth rate.
Figure 1. Annual publications trend on virtual reality and physical activity. R2: exponential growth rate.
Sensors 23 02987 g001
Sensors 23 02987 g002 550
Figure 2. Most prolific co-authors and co-authoring connections. Analysis: fractionalization, attraction: 10, repulsion: −2.
Figure 2. Most prolific co-authors and co-authoring connections. Analysis: fractionalization, attraction: 10, repulsion: −2.
Sensors 23 02987 g002
Sensors 23 02987 g003 550
Figure 3. Prominent co-authors. Analysis: fractionalization, attraction: 10, repulsion: −2, node size: document number, and colour: average citation number.
Figure 3. Prominent co-authors. Analysis: fractionalization, attraction: 10, repulsion: −2, node size: document number, and colour: average citation number.
Sensors 23 02987 g003
Sensors 23 02987 g004 550
Figure 4. Co-authored countries/regions. Analysis: fractionalization, attraction: 7, repulsion: 0, clustering: resolution (0.5), minimum cluster size: 3, node side: documents, colour: cluster.
Figure 4. Co-authored countries/regions. Analysis: fractionalization, attraction: 7, repulsion: 0, clustering: resolution (0.5), minimum cluster size: 3, node side: documents, colour: cluster.
Sensors 23 02987 g004
Sensors 23 02987 g005 550
Figure 5. Most used author keywords. Analysis: association strength; attraction: 6, repulsion: −2, clustering: resolution (0.5) and minimum cluster size: -2, node size: occurrences, colour: cluster.
Figure 5. Most used author keywords. Analysis: association strength; attraction: 6, repulsion: −2, clustering: resolution (0.5) and minimum cluster size: -2, node size: occurrences, colour: cluster.
Sensors 23 02987 g005
Sensors 23 02987 g006 550
Figure 6. Most cited documents and their connections. Analysis: association strength, attraction: 6; repulsion: −2, node size: citations, colour: cluster.
Figure 6. Most cited documents and their connections. Analysis: association strength, attraction: 6; repulsion: −2, node size: citations, colour: cluster.
Sensors 23 02987 g006
Table
Table 1. Top five thematic categories in the Web of Science, according to the number of documents in which publications were indexed.
Table 1. Top five thematic categories in the Web of Science, according to the number of documents in which publications were indexed.
WoS CategoriesDocs.Journals (Publishers)Docs.PublishersDocs.
Rehabilitation44Games for Health Journal (Mary Ann Liebert)12Mary Ann Liebert Inc.12
Sport Sciences40Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (Frontiers)5Taylor and Francis8
Public Environmental Occupational Health39Games for Health Journal (Mary Ann Liebert)12Mary Ann Liebert Inc.12
Engineering Electrical Electronic32Sensors (MDPI)8MDPI9
Computer Science Software Engineering28Virtual Reality (Springer)10Springer Nature14
Docs: Documents number.
Table
Table 2. Bradford’s Core and Zone I journals according to the number of citations.
Table 2. Bradford’s Core and Zone I journals according to the number of citations.
Bradford’s ZoneJournals (Publishers)Docs.% Cit.Cit.JIFQ.% O.A.
CoreInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (Taylor & Francis Inc.)494315.7%4.920Q18.7%
Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments (MIT Press)25058.4%N/AN/An.a.
Frontiers in Robotics and AI (Frontiers Media SA)24247.1%N/AN/A99.3%
Zone IScience Advances (American Association for the Advancement of Science)22494.2%14.972Q190.1%
Virtual Reality (Springer London Ltd.)101382.3%4.697Q128.4%
Games for Health Journal (Mary Ann Liebert Inc.)121352.3%4.070Q11.4%
Research in Developmental Disabilities (Pergamon-Elsevier)31342.2%3.000Q111.5%
Computers In Human Behaviour (Pergamon-Elsevier)31322.2%8.957Q111.3%
Pediatric Exercise Science (Human Kinetics Inc.)11222.0%2.395Q30.0%
Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation (BMC)21192.0%5.208Q199.6%
Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR Publications Inc.)71172.0%7.093Q199.2%
Age and Ageing (Oxford University Press)21151.9%12.782Q131.7%
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America (Saunders-Elsevier)11141.9%2.391Q21.3%
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (IEEE Computer Society)11131.9%1.909Q33.6%
Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie (Springer Heidelberg)11071.8%1.292Q429.9%
Computers and Education (Pergamon-Elsevier)21021.7%11.182Q111.4%
Cyberpsychology Behaviour and Social Networking (Mary Ann Liebert Inc.)3991.7%6.135Q15.8%
Physiotherapy (Elsevier Science)2861.4%3.704Q117.5%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (MDPI)10821.4%4.614Q195.0%
Interactive Learning Environments (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd.)2701.2%4.965Q14.4%
Docs.: number of documents; Cit: number of citations; % cit.: percentage of citations; JIF: Journal Impact Factor; % O.A.: Open Access percentage; Q.: quartile; N/A: not applicable.
Table
Table 3. Prominent co-authors on Virtual and Augmented Reality and Physical Activity.
Table 3. Prominent co-authors on Virtual and Augmented Reality and Physical Activity.
Co-AuthorsAffiliation/Countries-RegionsDocumentsCitations
Witte, KerstinOtto von Guericke University/Germany736
Kulpa, RichardUniversity of Rennes/France6188
Avraamides, MariosUniversity of Cyprus/Cyprus527
Gao, ZanUniversity of Minnesota/USA592
Bacchetta, MonicaIRCCS Italian Auxological Institute/Italy4221
Bideau, BenoitUniversity of Rennes/France4183
Fisher, AbiUniversity College London/England445
Hon, AdrianSix Start/England445
Mcdonough, DanielUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities/USA454
Molinari, EnricoIRCCS Italian Auxological Institute/Italy4221
Newby, KatieUniversity of Hertfordshire/England445
Petri, KatharinaOtto von Guericke University/Germany435
Polechonski, JacekAcademy of Physical Education in Katowice/Poland439
Pope, ZacharyWell Living Lab/USA462
Potts, HenryUniversity College London/England445
Riva, GiuseppeCatholic University of the Sacred Heart/Italy4221
Rutkowski, SebastianOpole University of Technology/Poland463
Smith, LeeAnglia Ruskin University/University445
Steptoe, AndrewUniversity College London/England445
Zeng, NanUniversity of New Mexico/USA462
Faric, NusaUniversity College London/England329
Hsiao, Kuei-FangUniversity of Sharjah/United Arab Emirates382
Ijaz, KiranMacquarie University/Australia3936
Slater, MelUniversity of Barcelona/Spain3401
Wodarski, PiotrSilesian University of Technology/Poland340
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Denche-Zamorano, A.; Rodriguez-Redondo, Y.; Barrios-Fernandez, S.; Mendoza-Muñoz, M.; Castillo-Paredes, A.; Rojo-Ramos, J.; Garcia-Gordillo, M.A.; Adsuar, J.C. Rehabilitation Is the Main Topic in Virtual and Augmented Reality and Physical Activity Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sensors 2023, 23, 2987. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062987

AMA Style

Denche-Zamorano A, Rodriguez-Redondo Y, Barrios-Fernandez S, Mendoza-Muñoz M, Castillo-Paredes A, Rojo-Ramos J, Garcia-Gordillo MA, Adsuar JC. Rehabilitation Is the Main Topic in Virtual and Augmented Reality and Physical Activity Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sensors. 2023; 23(6):2987. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062987

Chicago/Turabian Style

Denche-Zamorano, Angel, Yeray Rodriguez-Redondo, Sabina Barrios-Fernandez, María Mendoza-Muñoz, Antonio Castillo-Paredes, Jorge Rojo-Ramos, Miguel Angel Garcia-Gordillo, and Jose Carmelo Adsuar. 2023. "Rehabilitation Is the Main Topic in Virtual and Augmented Reality and Physical Activity Research: A Bibliometric Analysis" Sensors 23, no. 6: 2987. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062987

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop