Next Article in Journal
Organic Electronics—Microfluidics/Lab on a Chip Integration in Analytical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Small-Footprint 50 MHz Linear Array: Fabrication and Micro-Ultrasound Imaging Demonstration
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of 3D-Printed Beams and Slabs Using Self-Sensing Cementitious Composites and DIC Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Evaluation of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties after SMILE and FLEx Surgery by Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantitative Thermal Stimulation Using Therapeutic Ultrasound to Improve Cerebral Blood Flow and Reduce Vascular Stiffness

Sensors 2023, 23(20), 8487; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208487
by Kyung-Kwon Yi 1,†, Chansol Park 2,†, Jiwon Yang 3, Yeong-Bae Lee 3,4,* and Chang-Ki Kang 1,2,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(20), 8487; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208487
Submission received: 31 August 2023 / Revised: 7 October 2023 / Accepted: 11 October 2023 / Published: 16 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Ultrasonic Transducers: Imaging, Therapeutics and Sensing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study proposes the ultrasound therapy as an innovative intervention in order to increase cerebral blood flow and to prevent cerebrovascular diseases. It is a very interesting subject, apparently a promising future therapeutical method. The study is well designed, the discussions are clearly argumented.

Nevertheless, as limits of the study I would mention the lack of a control group (sham therapy) and the small sample size.

I would also propose some minor corrections:

-          Line 47: it should be „the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease has...” instead of „the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease occurs has...”

-          Line 61: it should be „transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation” instead of „translucent electrical nerve stimulation”

The Quality of English Language is quite good, but it could be improved if the paper were reviewed by a professional or native English speaker.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I have reviewed the article that the authors have written and I found it to be very well done, written, designed and laid out. I suggest its publication, the studies have important statistical reliability and their procedure is effective.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The experimental process of this article is complete and the main content is clearly expressed. It is a qualified scientific research article.

Back to TopTop