Next Article in Journal
Langmuir-Blodgett Films of Arachidic and Stearic Acids as Sensitive Coatings for Chloroform HF SAW Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Design, Fabrication and Characterisation of Multi-Parameter Optical Sensors Dedicated to E-Skin Applications
Previous Article in Journal
EMS: Efficient Monitoring System to Detect Non-Cooperative Nodes in IoT-Based Vehicular Delay Tolerant Networks (VDTNs)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Responsiveness of Daily Life Gait Quality Characteristics over One Year in Older Adults Who Experienced a Fall or Engaged in Balance Exercise

Sensors 2023, 23(1), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010101
by Sabine Schootemeijer 1,2,*, Roel H. A. Weijer 1,3, Marco J. M. Hoozemans 1, Kim Delbaere 4,5, Mirjam Pijnappels 1,† and Kimberley S. van Schooten 4,5,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010101
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Wearables 2022)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have reviewed the manuscript and I don't have any comments on the presented calculation methods, however I suggest authors to provide more information with references regarding the relevance of their study to both clinicians and general population. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This study aimed to test whether accelerometer-based characteristics of daily life gait quality are reliable and responsive to changes over a year in older adults who have experienced falls or exercise interventions. This is an interesting topic. Here are a few issues in the manuscript that require attention/clarification/justification.

 

1. Statistics require more detailed analysis.

 

2. Does disease and lifestyle affect the experiment?

 

3. The content of the conclusion part is too small, and the research results of this paper need to be introduced.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop