Next Article in Journal
Kidney-on-a-Chip: Mechanical Stimulation and Sensor Integration
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Biocomposites and Glass Fiber Epoxy Composites Based on Acoustic Emission Signals, Deep Feature Extraction, and Machine Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Dual-Wavelength Fiber Laser Sensor with Temperature and Strain Discrimination

by
Arturo Sanchez-Gonzalez
1,2,
Rosa Ana Perez-Herrera
1,2,*,
Pablo Roldan-Varona
3,4,5,
Miguel Duran-Escudero
1,
Luis Rodriguez-Cobo
4,
Jose Miguel Lopez-Higuera
3,4,5 and
Manuel Lopez-Amo
1,2
1
Department of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Public University of Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
2
Institute of Smart Cities (ISC), Public University of Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
3
Photonics Engineering Group, University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain
4
CIBER-BBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
5
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39005 Cantabria, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(18), 6888; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186888
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 4 September 2022 / Accepted: 11 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)

Abstract

:
This work presents a dual-wavelength C-band erbium-doped fiber laser assisted by an artificial backscatter reflector. This fiber-based reflector, inscribed by femtosecond laser direct writing, was fabricated into a single mode fiber with a length of 32 mm. The dual-wavelength laser obtained, centered at 1527.7 nm and 1530.81 nm, showed an optical signal-to-noise ratio over 46 dB when pumped at 150 mW. Another feature of this laser was that the power difference between the two channels was just 0.02 dB, regardless of the pump power, resulting in a dual emission laser with high equalization. On the other hand, an output power level and a central wavelength instability as low as 0.3 dB and 0.01 nm were measured, in this order for both channels. Moreover, the threshold pump power was 40 mW. Finally, the performance of this dual-wavelength fiber laser enhanced with a random reflector for sensing applications was studied, achieving the simultaneous measurement of strain and temperature with sensitivities around 1 pm/με and 9.29 pm/°C, respectively.

1. Introduction

Multiwavelength fiber lasers are of great interest for telecommunications, terahertz wave generation, sensing, fiber-optic tests and measurement applications [1]. Erbium doped fibers are the main efficient and usual amplification medium in this kind of laser. However, Erbium-doped fiber is a homogeneous gain medium at room temperature, which leads to some secondary problems, such as a strong mode competition. This competition can cause power fluctuations higher than 1.5 dB [2], power flatness worse than 16 dB and, sometimes, the need for liquid nitrogen cooling to reduce the homogeneous gain broadening [3,4].
Among previous applications, the need for equalization in the emitted wavelengths of a fiber laser is especially important for telecommunications and sensing [5]. This equalization can be achieved by using complicated cavities and non-lineal effects [6], by using a wavelength-flat amplification media [7] or by using special gain flattening filters [8]. These methods complicate the laser structure, or increase the cost of the laser.
Raman amplification-based fiber lasers are a good alternative to achieve stable and equalized laser emissions, due to the inhomogeneous behavior. Furthermore, Raman-based random distributed fiber lasers, based on amplified Rayleigh backscattering, show outstanding stabilities, in single or multiwavelength configurations [9]. However, these lasers need high pump power of watts and cavities of some kilometers in length [10,11]. Therefore, they are not well suited to develop compact or low-cost equipment.
Femtosecond (fs) laser direct-write optical fiber structures have proven to be of great interest for a wide range of applications. In particular, the development of fiber-optic microstructures, based on refractive index modification under fs-laser irradiation, has resulted in different implementations in the field of optical fiber sensors: surrounding refractive index sensors [12], strain sensors [13], curvature sensors [14], or multiparameter sensors [15], among others. With this new fabrication technique, it is possible to desing optical fiber reflectors, with a tailored wavelength response, to achieve a flat and stable wavelength emission.
For instance, recently, a dual-wavelength fiber laser, based on an fs-laser direct-write random Bragg grating array, which showed the properties of the fs written reflector, has been reported [16]. That laser improved power stability over that of previous dual-wavelength single mode Er-doped fiber-based lasers [17].
Here, a new single-mode fiber (SMF) artificial backscatter reflector (ABR), especially designed to improve previously reported dual-wavelength lasers, is presented. With this reflector we have demonstrated a compact and simple structure. More important, this new reflector allows high-power stability, low threshold pump power and remarkable equalization with respect to previous Er-doped fiber dual-wavelength lasers, achieving, simultaneously, a high optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR). In terms of sensing capabilities, this newly designed fiber structure ensures simultaneous measurement of strain and temperature with sensitivities comparable to those of other classical reflectors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Inscription Process

This SMF-based structure was inscribed following a process similar to the one presented in [18]. The random reflector was manufactured using a femtosecond commercial Fiber Laser Chirped Pulse Amplifier from CALMAR lasers, operating at 1030 nm wavelength, with 370 fs of pulse duration, and a variable pulse repetition rate available up to 120 kHz. Femtosecond laser processing provided an increase in the inhomogeneity of the fiber’s refractive index [19], resulting in an enhancement of the distributed dispersion. The SMF, located over a nano-resolution Aerotech stage motor, was placed on a slide and covered with a coverslip. Between them, an index-matching oil was deposited to limit fiber-induced aberrations [20]. Then, the laser pulses were tightly focused through a 100×/NA = 0.5 objective lens from Mitutoyo Corporation. Regarding the inscription parameters, a fast-changing pulse energy of 0.19 to 0.9 μJ, and a spatial period of 1 to 8, were selected for this ABR.

2.2. Reflector Characterization

Firstly, the reflectance of this random reflector was characterized by means of a broadband light source and an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA; model MS9740A, from Anritsu). The results are shown in Figure 1, where it can be seen that the measured reflection spectrum presented a fairly flat response, so the emission wavelength of the generated lasers would be determined mainly by the gain shape of the erbium-doped fiber (EDF) employed, with its peak core absorption at 1531 nm. The combination of this slight return loss, associated with selected wavelength, and the EDF non-uniform gain, led to a two-wavelength stable emission, as seen below.
Secondly, an ultra-high spatial resolution optical backscattered reflectometer (OBR 4600, from LUNA), commonly used for fiber testing and sensing [21], was employed to retrieve the backscattered optical power, measured as a function of the length of this fiber-based random reflector inscribed into a single mode fiber. To avoid undesired reflections, free termination of the fiber-based reflector was immersed into index–matching oil. This measurement was performed in the time-domain acquisition mode, with a spatial resolution of 0.1 nm. As Figure 2 shows, the length of the inscription was around 34 mm and this fiber sample was located at 2.39 m from the OBR connector.

2.3. Experimental Setup

Figure 3 depicts the schematic diagram of the experimental setup carried out to evaluate the laser generation and sensor properties when using this single mode fiber random reflector (SMF–RR) within the resonator acting as a quasi-distributed mirror.
In this configuration, the light injected into the cavity ends at a fiber loop mirror (FLM) after passing through ports 1 and 2 of the 4-port optical circulator. The FLM includes a 3-port optical circulator, in which ports 1 and 3 are connected to a variable optical attenuator (VOA) to control the amount of light reflected into the rest of the cavity. After recirculating this signal, it reaches an optical coupler (OC). At this point, 5% of this signal is then extracted to be monitored by means of an optical spectrum analyzer, while the remaining 95% travels through a polarization controller (PC) to the random reflector, located at the right end of the cavity. This PC is also used to adjust the lasing stability. The reflected light from the random reflector finally recirculates via the PC, the OC, and ports 3 and 4 of the 4-port circulator, reaching the EDFA at its entry port and completing the round-trip through the cavity. The gain medium was 2.5 m of highly EDF I25 (980/125, Fibercore Inc., Las Vegas, NV, USA), suitable for C-band amplifiers with a core composition optimized for EDFAs in dense-WDM (DWDM) networks and a peak core absorption range from 7.7 to 9.4 dB/m at 1531 nm.

3. Results

3.1. Laser Performance

The output spectrum of this erbium-doped fiber laser when pumped by a 976-nm source at 150 mW is shown in Figure 4. A dual-wavelength laser emission centered at 1527.7 nm and 1530.81 nm with an OSNR of 47.3 dB and 46.0 dB were measured, in that order. In addition, output power levels of −10.17 dBm and −10.15 dBm were achieved for each channel, respectively, showing a difference between them as low as 0.02 dB. This power difference between the two channels was kept reduced for all pumping power values, as Figure 5 illustrates, which makes this EDFL a highly equalized dual wavelength laser.
In order to evaluate the output spectra of this laser, the EDFL was pumped with powers ranging from 0 to 400 mW. Figure 6 depicts the relationship between the output power levels as a function of the 976-nm pump power for this SMF–RR–based fiber laser. This figure shows that both laser emission lines presented a threshold pump power of around 40 mW. A very high-power equalization for both emission channels could once again be observed in this new figure.
The longitudinal-modal behavior of this EDFL was also evaluated by means of a high-performance optical spectrum analyzer (Aragon Photonics BOSA–C). This device is capable of providing a spectral resolution of 0.08 pm with a dynamic range greater than 80 dB. Due to the fact that the total length of the cavity was short enough to fit the spectral resolution of the instrument, it was suitable to discriminate between longitudinal modes, thereby avoiding the need to analyze the electric beat with a tunable laser source (TLS). The result of this characterization is presented in Figure 7a where, taking into account the previous consideration, single-longitudinal mode (SLM) behavior can be verified. Detailed views of the output spectra of the 1527.7 nm and 1530.81 nm emission lines are shown in Figure 7b,c, respectively.
To investigate the response of each emission line in the absence of the remaining one, a narrowband (1.5 nm) bandpass tunable optical filter was introduced between OC and PC from Figure 3, centering its transmission band on each lasing wavelength one at a time. SLM operation persisted in both cases, discarding any notions that this behavior was due to mode competition and mode hopping annihilation by means of inter-channel seed light interaction [22]. Instead, the SLM lasing seemed to be exclusively due to the random nature of the reflector, as suggested by previous studies [23].
The output power stability over time was analyzed. The peak powers of the 1527.7 nm and 1530.81 nm emission lines were tracked for different levels of pump power up to 400 mW, and for 1 h in each case. In every case, the power instability was found to be below 0.5 dB. Figure 8 shows the results achieved when pumped at 400 mW, reaching output power instabilities of 0.29 dB (blue lines) and 0.34 dB (red lines) for these two emission lines, with a confidence level (CL) of 95%. Due to the SLM behavior of the laser, these achieved stabilities were better than those reported for stable lasers in the introduction. Furthermore, we achieved SLM operation without the utilization of saturable absorbers, as needed in [24].

3.2. Sensor Performance

Finally, the performance of this reflector as a temperature and strain sensor was experimentally evaluated. For this purpose, the random reflector was first placed into a climatic chamber while the resonance wavelength shift was measured, by means of the above mentioned OSA from Anritsu, as the temperature was steadily increased from room temperature to 75 °C. The results are presented in Figure 9 and, as can be seen, both emission lines presented the same strong linear trend, with an identical temperature sensitivity of 9.29 pm/°C. Secondly, the reflector was introduced into a custom-built motorized translation stage designed for strain measurement with a resolution of 0.09 με. As in the previous case, an OSA tracked the shift of both emission lines as strain was applied up to a value of 400 με, this time while temperature remained fixed. As a result, Figure 10 shows a strong linear dependency of the wavelength shift on the applied strain, reaching sensitivities of 0.95 and 1.01 pm/με for the 1527.70 and 1530.81 nm emission lines, respectively. These results remain comparable with those of commercial fiber Bragg Gratings (FBGs), with values around 13 pm/°C for temperature and 1.2 pm/με for strain [25].
The obtained strain sensitivities, although apparently similar, could be tested to be statistically different with a CL of over 99.99% by applying the hypothesis test for the slope of two regression lines [26]. By contrast, temperature sensitivities were to be considered equal at the same confidence level. Therefore, if the shift in wavelength for each emission line ( Δ λ 1 , Δ λ 2 ) was expressed as a function of the temperature variation ( Δ T ) and strain applied ( Δ ε ) in the usual way [27], the result obtained was a linearly independent system, which, in matrix form, could be written as follows:
Δ λ 1 Δ λ 2 = k T k ε 1 k T k ε 2 Δ T Δ ε ,
where k T , k ε 1 and k ε 2 correspond to the temperature and strain sensitivities of 1527.70 and 1530.81 nm emission lines, respectively.
Accordingly, inverting the previous expression, the temperature variation and strain applied are given by:
Δ T Δ ε = k T k ε 1 k T k ε 2 1 Δ λ 1 Δ λ 2 = 1 k ε 2 k ε 1 k ε 2 k T k ε 1 k T 1 1 Δ λ 1 Δ λ 2 .
For the particular SMF-RR designed, using the previously measured sensitivities, temperature and strain applied simultaneously to the sensors could be deducted from the shift in laser emission lines wavelength as follows:
Δ T Δ ε = 1.873 1.765 17.24 17.24 Δ λ 1 Δ λ 2 ,
where wavelength shift is expressed in picometers, the temperature variation in Celsius degrees, and applied strain in micro-strain units.
These results underline the feasibility of employing random reflectors not only as mirrors, but also as substitutes for other classical temperature and strain sensors, as the necessity of temperature compensation in strain sensing applications is overridden by exploiting the different sensitivities of each emission line, while remaining comparable in magnitude to commercial FBGs.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a highly equalized dual-wavelength C-band fiber laser enhanced with a fiber random reflector was experimentally demonstrated. This random reflector was inscribed into a single mode fiber by femtosecond laser direct writing with a total length of 32 mm. Dual-wavelength, centered at 1527.7 nm and 1530.81 nm, with an optical signal-to-noise ratio of up to 47 dB, were obtained when pumped at 150 mW. These two laser emission lines had a very high level of equalization, as the difference between them was as low as 0.02 dB, independently of the pump power. In addition, both emission lines were shown to exhibit single-mode longitudinal behavior. These factors resulted in high stability in both output power levels and emission wavelength, varying by only 0.3 dB and 0.01 nm, respectively, over 1 h, and with a confidence level of 95%, when pumped at 400 mW. In addition to the above, the feasibility of these random reflectors not only as mirrors, but also as sensors, was experimentally demonstrated, reaching sensitivities of 9.29 pm/°C for temperature and around 1 pm/με for strain. In this regard, a laser capable of simultaneously measuring strain and temperature with sensitivities comparable with those of FBGs, while using a single quasi-point sensing element, was developed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.-A.; Methodology, R.A.P.-H.; Software, A.S.-G.; Validation, R.A.P.-H. and L.R.-C.; Formal Analysis, A.S.-G.; Investigation, A.S.-G., M.D.-E. and P.R.-V.; Resources, P.R.-V. and L.R.-C.; Data Curation, A.S.-G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.S.-G., P.R.-V. and R.A.P.-H.; Writing—Review & Editing, R.A.P.-H., M.L.-A. and J.M.L.-H.; Visualization, R.A.P.-H.; Supervision, M.L.-A. and J.M.L.-H.; Project Administration, M.L.-A. and J.M.L.-H.; Funding Acquisition, M.L.-A. and J.M.L.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is part of the projects PID2019-107270RB, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER “A way to make Europe”, and PDC2021-121172 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and European Union “Next generationEU”/PTR, the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte of Spain (PhD grant FPU2018/02797).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perez-Herrera, R.A.; Lopez-Amo, M. Multi-Wavelength Fiber Lasers. In Current Developments in Optical Fiber Technology, 1st ed.; Harun, S.W., Arof, H., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bing, F.; Xuefang, Z.; Zengyang, L.; Yu, Z.; Tianshu, W. Experimental Research on an L-Band Multi-Wavelength Erbium-Doped Fiber Laser based on a Cascaded Sagnac Loop and M–Z Filters. Laser Phys. 2019, 29, 065102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, X.; Li, T.; Yang, J. Stabilize and Flatten Multi-Wavelength Erbium-Doped Fiber Laser through Accurate Hybrid Dual-Ring-Configuration Control. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bellemare, A. Continuous-Wave Silica-based Erbium-Doped Fibre Lasers. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2003, 27, 211–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Multiwavelength Lasers Simplify WDM Networks and Applications. Available online: https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Multiwavelength_Lasers_Simplify_WDM_Networks_and/a15319 (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  6. Shao, Z.; Qiao, X.; Rong, Q.; Su, D. Generation of Dual-Wavelength Square Pulse in a Figure-Eight Erbium-Doped Fiber Laser with Ultra-Large Net-Anomalous Dispersion. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 6711–6716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Azzawi, A.A.; Almukhtar, A.A.; Reddy, P.H.; Dutta, D.; Das, S.; Dhar, A.; Paul, M.C.; Ahmad, H.; Harun, S.W. Wide-Band Flat-Gain Optical Amplifier using Hafnia and Zirconia Erbium Co-Doped Fibres in Double-Pass Parallel Configuration. J. Mod. Opt. 2019, 66, 1711–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shah, A.; Mankodi, P. Analysis and Simulation on Gain Flattening Filter of an Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier for Multi-Channel WDM System. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), Chennai, India, 22–24 March 2017; pp. 458–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pinto, A.M.R.; Frazão, O.; Santos, J.L.; Lopez-Amo, M. Multiwavelength Fiber Laser based on a Photonic Crystal Fiber Loop Mirror with Cooperative Rayleigh Scattering. Appl. Phys. B 2010, 99, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Turitsynet, S.K.; Babin, S.A.; Churkin, D.V.; Vatnik, I.D.; Nikulin, M.; Podivilov, E.V. Random Distributed Feedback Fibre Lasers. Phys. Rep. 2014, 542, 133–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.; Gao, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, L.; Wang, T.; Gao, F.; Hu, X.; Li, S.; Zhu, Y. Advances in Random Fiber Lasers and Their Sensing Application. Sensors 2020, 20, 6122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, P.C.; Shu, X.W.; Cao, H.Y.; Sugden, K. Ultra-Sensitive Refractive Index Sensor based on Extremely Simple Femtosecond-Laser-Induced Structure. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 1157–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deng, J.; Wang, D.N. Ultra-Sensitive Strain Sensor based on Femtosecond Laser Inscribed in-Fiber Reflection Mirrors and Vernier Effect. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 4935–4939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yakushina, S.S.; Wolf, A.A.; Dostovalov, A.V.; Skvortsov, M.I.; Wabnitz, S.; Babin, S.A. A Study of Bending Effect on the Femtosecond-Pulse Inscribed Fiber Bragg Gratings in a Dual-Core Fiber. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2018, 43, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leal-Junior, A.G.; Theodosiou, A.; Díaz, C.R.; Marques, C.; Pontes, M.J.; Kalli, K.; Frizera, A. Simultaneous Measurement of Axial Strain, Bending and Torsion with a Single Fiber Bragg Grating in CYTOP Fiber. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lv, B.; Zhang, W.; Huang, W.; Li, F. Switchable and Compact Dual-Wavelength Random Fiber Laser based on Random Bragg Grating Array. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2022, 70, 102858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Quintela, M.A.; Perez-Herrera, R.A.; Canales, I.; Fernandez-Vallejo, M.; Lopez-Amo, M.; Lopez-Higuera, J.M. Stabilization of Dual-Wavelength Erbium-Doped Fiber Ring Lasers by Single-Mode Operation. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2010, 22, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perez-Herrera, R.A.; Bravo, M.; Roldan-Varona, P.; Leandro, D.; Rodriguez-Cobo, L.; Lopez-Higuera, J.M.; Lopez-Amo, M. Microdrilled Tapers to Enhance Optical Fiber Lasers for Sensing. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, K.; Shen, F.; Yin, G.; Zhang, L. Optical Fiber Micro-Devices made with Femtosecond Laser. In Advanced Photonics 2016 (IPR, NOMA, Sensors, Networks, SPPCom, SOF); OSA Technical Digest: Online, 2016; p. SeW3D.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gattass, R.; Mazur, E. Femtosecond Laser Micromachining in Transparent Materials. Nat. Photon. 2008, 2, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mariñelarena, J.; Mompó, J.J.; Zurita, J.; Urricelqui, J.; Judez, A.; López Amo, M.; Jiménez, S.; Achaerandio, A.; Loayssa, A. Structural Health Monitoring of Solar Trackers using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensors. In Proceedings of the SPIE 10970, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, Denver, CO, USA, 4–7 March 2019; p. 109701V. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Dragic, P.D. Analytical Model for Injection-Seeded Erbium-Doped Fiber Ring Lasers. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 1629–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Perez-Herrera, R.A.; Roldan-Varona, P.; Rodriguez-Cobo, L.; Lopez-Higuera, J.M.; Lopez-Amo, M. High Performance Fiber Laser Resonator for Dual Band (C and L) Sensing. J. Light. Technol. 2022, 40, 5273–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Perez-Herrera, R.A.; Roldán-Varona, P.; Rodriguez-Cobo, L.; López-Higuera, J.M.; Lopez-Amo, M. Single Longitudinal Mode Lasers by Using Artificially Controlled Backscattering Erbium Doped Fibers. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 27428–27433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Campanella, C.E.; Cuccovillo, A.; Campanella, C.; Yurt, A.; Passaro, V.M.N. Fibre Bragg Grating Based Strain Sensors: Review of Technology and Applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sachs, L. Applied Statistics: A Handbook of Techniques, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 440–442. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cui, J.; Hu, Y.; Feng, K.; Li, J.; Tan, J. FBG Interrogation Method with High Resolution and Response Speed Based on a Reflective-Matched FBG Scheme. Sensors 2015, 15, 16516–16535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Return loss of the SMF–random reflector as a function of the wavelength measured by an OSA.
Figure 1. Return loss of the SMF–random reflector as a function of the wavelength measured by an OSA.
Sensors 22 06888 g001
Figure 2. Backscattered optical power as a function of fiber length.
Figure 2. Backscattered optical power as a function of fiber length.
Sensors 22 06888 g002
Figure 3. Experimental setup of the fiber laser resonator. SMF-RR: single mode fiber random reflector; PC: polarization controller; 95:5 optical coupler; EDFA: Erbium doped fiber optical amplifier; VOA: variable optical attenuator.
Figure 3. Experimental setup of the fiber laser resonator. SMF-RR: single mode fiber random reflector; PC: polarization controller; 95:5 optical coupler; EDFA: Erbium doped fiber optical amplifier; VOA: variable optical attenuator.
Sensors 22 06888 g003
Figure 4. Output spectra of the highly equalized dual-wavelength C–band fiber laser assisted by a random reflector pumped at 150 mW and measured by an OSA.
Figure 4. Output spectra of the highly equalized dual-wavelength C–band fiber laser assisted by a random reflector pumped at 150 mW and measured by an OSA.
Sensors 22 06888 g004
Figure 5. Output spectra of the highly equalized dual-wavelength C–band fiber laser assisted by a random reflector pumped from 40 to 400 mW and measured by an OSA.
Figure 5. Output spectra of the highly equalized dual-wavelength C–band fiber laser assisted by a random reflector pumped from 40 to 400 mW and measured by an OSA.
Sensors 22 06888 g005
Figure 6. Relationship between the output power levels versus 976-nm pump power for the 1527.7 nm (blue line) and 1530.81 nm (red line) emission lines.
Figure 6. Relationship between the output power levels versus 976-nm pump power for the 1527.7 nm (blue line) and 1530.81 nm (red line) emission lines.
Sensors 22 06888 g006
Figure 7. Output spectrum of the fiber laser when pumped at 150 mW and measured by a BOSA–C (a), with a detailed view of the 1527.7 nm (b) and 1530.81 nm (c) emission lines.
Figure 7. Output spectrum of the fiber laser when pumped at 150 mW and measured by a BOSA–C (a), with a detailed view of the 1527.7 nm (b) and 1530.81 nm (c) emission lines.
Sensors 22 06888 g007
Figure 8. Output power stability of the 1527.70 nm (blue) and 1530.81 nm (red) emission lines when pumped at 400 mW, measured over 1 h with a CL of 95%.
Figure 8. Output power stability of the 1527.70 nm (blue) and 1530.81 nm (red) emission lines when pumped at 400 mW, measured over 1 h with a CL of 95%.
Sensors 22 06888 g008
Figure 9. Wavelength shift as function of temperature when using the SMF−RR for the 1527.7 nm (blue) and 1530.81 nm (red) emission lines.
Figure 9. Wavelength shift as function of temperature when using the SMF−RR for the 1527.7 nm (blue) and 1530.81 nm (red) emission lines.
Sensors 22 06888 g009
Figure 10. Wavelength shift as function of strain when using the SMF−RR for the 1527.7 nm (blue) and 1530.81 nm (red) emission lines.
Figure 10. Wavelength shift as function of strain when using the SMF−RR for the 1527.7 nm (blue) and 1530.81 nm (red) emission lines.
Sensors 22 06888 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Perez-Herrera, R.A.; Roldan-Varona, P.; Duran-Escudero, M.; Rodriguez-Cobo, L.; Lopez-Higuera, J.M.; Lopez-Amo, M. A Dual-Wavelength Fiber Laser Sensor with Temperature and Strain Discrimination. Sensors 2022, 22, 6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186888

AMA Style

Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Perez-Herrera RA, Roldan-Varona P, Duran-Escudero M, Rodriguez-Cobo L, Lopez-Higuera JM, Lopez-Amo M. A Dual-Wavelength Fiber Laser Sensor with Temperature and Strain Discrimination. Sensors. 2022; 22(18):6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186888

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanchez-Gonzalez, Arturo, Rosa Ana Perez-Herrera, Pablo Roldan-Varona, Miguel Duran-Escudero, Luis Rodriguez-Cobo, Jose Miguel Lopez-Higuera, and Manuel Lopez-Amo. 2022. "A Dual-Wavelength Fiber Laser Sensor with Temperature and Strain Discrimination" Sensors 22, no. 18: 6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186888

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop