Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1) In introduction, introduce the problem, motivate the problem, and summarize the contributions

2) Related work: There are many published works and authors are suggested to do a detailed literature survey and in addition mention the disadvatages of the exsisting works and how the proposed work overcomes these limitations. Some works to include in related works are

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-76216-2_14  
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-76216-2_3
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8985278
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9377310

3) Performance of the proposed method should be comapred with the exsisting 3 related works

4) Include the proposed approach advatages and limitations

5) Robustness of the proposed study can be included

Author Response

Thank you for valuable comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The proposal is appealing and interesting, and the method deserves some consideration. Moreover, the paper is almost well written and well organized.


- The text, in general, reads well, but a grammatical revision could improve it further.

- The paper adequately puts the progress it reports in the context of previous work, representative referencing and first discussion.

Author Response

Thanks for valuable comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for valuable comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Present form is publishable