Next Article in Journal
Dual Band MEMS Directional Acoustic Sensor for Near Resonance Operation
Previous Article in Journal
Best of Both Worlds: Detecting Application Layer Attacks through 802.11 and Non-802.11 Features
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual-Frequency Linear-to-Circular Polarization Converter for Ka-Band Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Dual-Band CPW Graphene Antenna for Smart Cities and IoT Applications

by
Nathaniel Morales-Centla
1,
Richard Torrealba-Melendez
1,*,
Edna Iliana Tamariz-Flores
2,
Mario López-López
1,
Cesar Augusto Arriaga-Arriaga
1,
Jesus M. Munoz-Pacheco
1 and
Victor R. Gonzalez-Diaz
1
1
Faculty of Electronics Sciences, Autonomous University of Puebla, Puebla 72570, Mexico
2
Faculty of Computational Sciences, Autonomous University of Puebla, Puebla 72570, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(15), 5634; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155634
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Multi-Band Antennas and Millimeter-Wave Components)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a dual-band graphene coplanar waveguide antenna is designed for smart cities and internet of things applications. A graphene film is chosen as the conductive material for the radiation patches and ground plane with a thickness of 240 μm and an electric conductivity of 3.5 × 105 S/m. The dielectric is glass with a dielectric permittivity of 6 and a thickness of 2 mm. The implementation of the antenna on glass permits the integration of the antenna in smart cities and IoT applications. This antenna is based on two trapezoidal patches that generate the dual-band behavior. The overall dimensions of the antenna are 30 mm × 30 mm × 2 mm. The reflection coefficient, gain, and radiation patterns were measured and compared with the simulations. The antenna covers two frequency bands; the lower band covers the 2.45 GHz ISM band, and the upper band range covers from 4 to 7 GHz.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, most electronic communications are wireless. Furthermore, the number of wireless links has increased in the last years due to the necessity to connect everything with everything [1]. Moreover, concepts such as the internet of things (IoT) [2,3,4], smart cities [5,6,7], and smart health [8,9], and vehicular networks such as vehicle to vehicle (V2V) or vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) [10,11,12] depend enormously on wireless sensor networks to perform. Antennas are a vital part of the wireless communications system in all these concepts. The antennas need to be placed in windows, buildings, clothing, vehicles, street infrastructure, and human bodies. These antennas must present a specific radiation and frequency operation performance. Moreover, the antennas have to be designed over novel materials that permit integration with the environment. This integration can be achieved using planar antennas fabricated over flexible and rigid materials; this material can also be opaque or transparent [13,14].
On the other hand, copper is usually the most employed in the conductor materials that conform to the antennas; however, recent research reports on using indium oxide (ITO) and graphene as a conductor in antenna design. Concerning ITO antennas, these present wideband behavior but low gain due to the low conductivity of the ITO, as reported in [15,16,17]. On the other hand, graphene presents properties such as high conductivity, flexibility, and excellent mechanical resistance [18,19]; this is ideal for it to be employed as a conductor in antennas. Due to these properties, graphene has been employed in antenna design for Terahertz communications [20,21,22] with a frequency range of 1 to 10 THz. In recent years, new technics have been developed to deposit graphene over a substrate and graphene films that have allowed the design of antennas at frequencies below 10 GHz. For example, T. Leng et al. [23] presented a dual-band graphene antenna for WiFi frequencies; this antenna was printed on a paper substrate. Furthermore, in [24] and [25], the authors showed graphene array antennas printed on paper for WiFi bands and Sub-6 GHz 5G mid-bands, respectively. Another example of printed graphene antennas was reported by K. Pan et al. [26], who designed an ultra-wideband monopole with printed graphene with a frequency range from 4 to 14 GHz.
Moreover, Lamminen et al. [27] shows a printed dipole antenna in Dupon dielectric and graphene flakes for ISM bands. An important application of graphene antennas is wearable technology [28,29,30]; Zu et al. [28] presented a design over a flexible substrate and highly conductive graphene film, and Sindhu et al. [29] employed laser-induced graphene (LIG) to print the design; both antennas operate at 5.8 GHz. Kapetanakis et al. [30] presented wearable patch antennas with graphene over a textile substrate at 2.45 GHz.
Furthermore, taking advantage of the flexibility of graphene, Zelong et al. [31] reported a dual-band flexible antenna using a graphene film over a polydimethylsiloxane substrate. Finally, it is essential to mention that designs of graphene antennas over glass as a substrate barely exist. However, an example of graphene antennas over glass is reported in [32]. This paper presents a dipole-printed antenna over glass at 2.45 GHz. Table 1 summarizes the related work and the proposed antenna concerning operation frequencies, conductivity, type of graphene, and substrate.
This paper presents the design of a multiband coplanar waveguide antenna using a graphene film over a glass substrate. The proposed antenna presents omnidirectional radiation and operates in two bands, first in the 2.45 GHz ISM band and the second band covering the frequency range from 4 to 6 GHz to generate the multiband behavior; the antenna is formed by two resonator patches, as reported in [33,34,35,36]. The antenna is fully characterized by the reflection coefficient and the radiation patterns’ measurement. The simulated and measured results are in concordance. The main contribution of the proposal is the development of a multiband antenna over glass and graphene for integration into smart cities and vehicular network applications.

2. Materials and Methods

The proposed antenna is configured by a coplanar waveguide line to feed the antenna with a characteristic impedance Z0. In addition, the antenna has two radiator patches with an isosceles trapezoidal form [30,31,32,33]; Figure 1 shows the geometry of the proposed antenna. In this geometry, w4 controls the lowest frequency band (fmin), and w2 works over the higher frequency band (fmin). The dimensions of w2 and w4 were calculated by the following equations
w 2   = c 2 f m a x ε r ,
w 4   = c 2 f m i n ε r ,
where ε r is the relative permittivity of the substrate, and c is the speed of light in the vacuum.
In this proposal, for the antenna design, graphene foil was employed (XG Leaf B, Lansing, MI, USA) with a thickness of 240 μm and electric conductivity of 3.5 × 105 S/m. The dielectric was glass with relative permittivity of 6 and a thickness of 2 mm. In order to obtain the design and optimize it, high-frequency structural simulation (Ansys HFSS, Canonsburg, PA, USA) was employed.
The dimensions of the coplanar waveguide feed line were calculated using the Advanced Design System software (ADS, Santa Rosa, CA, USA), considering a characteristic impedance of 50 Ohms, and the dimensions of the trapezoidal patches were obtained with Equations (1) and (2). Considering the central frequency at 2.45 GHz for the first band and the second band at 5.8 GHz, the starting dimensions of w2 and w4 were approximately 10 mm and 25 mm, respectively. Throughout the parametric analysis of the reflection coefficient (S11), the final dimensions of the antenna were determined; these dimensions are reported in Table 2. The parametric analysis was developed by the variation in the parameters w2, w4, and l01. From this analysis, we found and demonstrated that w4 controls the band of 2.45 GHz; this resonance band shifts to the right as w4 decreases, as seen in Figure 2.
Moreover, Figure 3 shows the effect of w2 over the upper band (5.8 GHz). Concerning this case, while w2 is reduced, S11 decreases, and the lowest frequency of this band shifts to the left. Finally, l01 affects both bands concerning the coupling, as shown in Figure 4.

3. Results and Discussion

After the final dimensions of the antenna were obtained through parametric analysis, the antenna was fabricated and fully characterized by the measurement of its reflection coefficient, radiation diagrams, and peak gain at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz.
The first step of fabricating the antenna was to record a mask of the desired geometry over the graphene foil using a laser cutter (SMTRobotic, 1390BT, China), as shown in Figure 5. Then with a double sided adhesive paper, the graphene mask of the antenna was placed over the glass substrate. In addition, to connect the antenna, an SMA connector was employed. Figure 6 shows the fabricated antenna.
In other to start the characterization of the antenna, the antenna was connected to a Vector Network Analyzer (VectorStart, Anritsu, Morgan Hill, CA, USA) to measure its reflection coefficient (S11) from 1 to 8 GHz. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients are compared and shown in Figure 7. The measurement S11 suffers a shift of 150 MHZ for the first band, and the resonance frequency is at 2.6 GHz. The second band in the measurement starts at 4.3 GHz and ends at 7.1 GHz. These frequency shifts and differences between simulation and measurement are due to the variations in the dielectric properties of the glass substrate, and in a lower proportion to fabrication flaws. However, the bandwidth increase in the second band relates to the conductivity of the graphene in antennas with radiation elements with low conductivity such as ITO [16,17], present, and UWB behavior. The simulation and measurement are in concordance with the behavior of S11. Table 3 shows the fraction bandwidth for each band.
Figure 8 shows the measured and simulated radiation patterns in H and E planes for 2.6 GHz and 5.8 GHz. In both cases, the graphene antenna presents an omnidirectional behavior in the H-plane and bidirectional radiation in the E-plane. The resolution in degrees of the measurement of radiation patterns was 10 degrees. The difference between the simulated and measured radiation patterns is related to the uncertainty caused by the fact that the measurements were not performed in a controlled environment.
Finally, Table 4 shows the simulation and measured peak gain at two frequency bands. From this Table, we appreciate that the gain is negative at the frequency of 2.45 GHz; on the other hand, at 5.8 GHz, the gain increased to positive values. The gain was measured using the three antenna method [36]. The antennas employed in this gain measurement were the fabricated antenna, a standard log periodic directional antenna (Hyper Log 7060, Aaronia, Strickscheid, Germany), and a Vivaldi antipodal antenna that operates in the UWB range. These values of gain are expected; a similar behavior was reported in [25]. However, these values are higher than the gain of antennas with ITO [17].
Finally, the current distribution for the graphene antenna was simulated at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz and is shown in Figure 9. Figure 9a shows that the current distribution at 2.45 GHz is more intense in the second trapezoidal patch that corresponds to the lower frequency band. Moreover, at 5.8 GHz, the distribution current is mainly on the smallest base of the first trapezoidal patch; as was mentioned, this base controls the upper band of the antenna.

4. Conclusions

A dual-band CPW graphene antenna was designed for applications in smart cities and IoT. This antenna was designed using a graphene film and implemented over a glass substrate. The implementation of glass enables the proposed antenna to be integrated into applications of IoT and smart cities. This design consists of a coplanar line to feed the trapezoidal patches that produce the dual-band behavior. The measurement reflection coefficient is in concordance with simulations.
The dual-band behavior of this antenna is presented in two bands. First, with regards to the lower band at 2.45 GHz, in the experimental results, this band suffers a smooth shift in frequency. The second band covers the ranges of 4 to 7 GHz. These two bands comply with several standards of communication.
Concerning the gain, these present values under 1 dB, in both frequencies, due to the conductivity of the graphene. Finally, the antenna presents an omnidirectional behavior for the H-plane.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F., M.L.-L., C.A.A.-A., J.M.M.-P. and V.R.G.-D.; methodology, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F. and M.L.-L.; software, N.M.-C. and R.T.-M.; validation, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F., M.L.-L., C.A.A.-A., J.M.M.-P. and V.R.G.-D.; formal analysis, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F. and M.L.-L.; investigation, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F., M.L.-L., C.A.A.-A., J.M.M.-P. and V.R.G.-D.; resources, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F., M.L.-L., C.A.A.-A., J.M.M.-P. and V.R.G.-D.; data curation, N.M.-C. and R.T.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M.-C. and R.T.-M.; writing—review and editing, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F. and M.L.-L.; visualization, N.M.-C., R.T.-M., E.I.T.-F. and M.L.-L.; supervision, R.T.-M.; project administration, R.T.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, S.K.; Bae, M.; Kim, H. Future of IoT Networks: A Survey. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, D.; Lan, G.; Hassan, M.; Hu, W.; Das, S.K. Sensing, Computing, and Communications for Energy Harvesting IoTs: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 1222–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vaezi, M.; Azari, A.; Khosravirad, S.R.; Shirvanimoghaddam, M.; Azari, M.M.; Chasaki, D.; Popovski, P. Cellular, Wide-Area, and Non-Terrestrial IoT: A Survey on 5G Advances and the Road Toward 6G. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 24, 1117–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jabbar, W.A.; Kian, T.K.; Ramli, R.M.; Zubir, S.N.; Zamrizaman, N.S.M.; Balfaqih, M.; Shepelev, V.; Alharbi, S. Design and Fabrication of Smart Home with Internet of Things Enabled Automation System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 144059–144074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roque-Cilia, S.; Tamariz-Flores, E.I.; Torrealba-Meléndez, R.; Covarrubias-Rosales, D.H. Transport tracking through communication in WDSN for smart cities. Measurement 2019, 139, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burlacu, M.; Boboc, R.G.; Butilă, E.V. Smart Cities and Transportation: Reviewing the Scientific Character of the Theories. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Almeida, V.A.; Doneda, D.; da Costa, E.M. Humane Smart Cities: The Need for Governance. IEEE Internet Comput. 2018, 22, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodrigues, V.F.; Righi, R.D.R.; da Costa, C.A.; Antunes, R.S. Smart Hospitals and IoT Sensors: Why Is QoS Essential Here? J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2022, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Venkatesh, J.; Aksanli, B.; Chan, C.S.; Akyurek, A.S.; Rosing, T.S. Modular and Personalized Smart Health Application Design in a Smart City Environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Zen, H.; Sabri, M.F.M.; Wang, X.; Kho, L.C. Towards Strengthening the Resilience of IoV Networks—A Trust Management Perspective. Futur. Internet 2022, 14, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tamariz-Flores, E.I.; Torrealba-Meléndez, R. Vehicular Network Systems in Smart Cities. In Handbook of Smart Cities; Augusto, J.C., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Teixeira, L.H.; Huszák, Á. Reinforcement Learning Environment for Advanced Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Communication Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bolaños-Torres, M.; Torrealba-Meléndez, R.; Muñoz-Pacheco, J.M.; Goméz-Pavón, L.D.C.; Tamariz-Flores, E.I. Multiband Flexible Antenna for Wearable Personal Communications. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2018, 100, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cai, L. An On-Glass Optically Transparent Monopole Antenna with Ultrawide Bandwidth for Solar Energy Harvesting. Electronics 2019, 8, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Harati, M.R.; Naser-Moghadasi, M.; Lotfi-Neyestanak, A.A.; Nikfarjam, A. Improving the Efficiency of Transparent Antenna Using Gold Nano Layer Deposition. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 15, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lopez-Marcos, F.; Torrealba-Melendez, R.; Vasquez-Agustin, M.A.; Muñoz-Pacheco, J.M.; Tamariz-Flores, E.I.; Lopez-Lopez, M. A MIMO Transparent Antenna for FR1-5G Communications. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 123, 3645–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trujillo-Flores, J.I.; Torrealba-Meléndez, R.; Muñoz-Pacheco, J.M.; Vásquez-Agustín, M.A.; Tamariz-Flores, E.I.; Colín-Beltrán, E.; López-López, M. CPW-Fed Transparent Antenna for Vehicle Communications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ye, N.; Liang, T.; Zhan, L.; Kong, Y.; Xie, S.; Ma, X.; Chen, H.; Su, H.; Xu, M. High-Performance Bendable Organic Solar Cells With Silver Nanowire-Graphene Hybrid Electrode. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2019, 9, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, B.; Fan, C.; Feng, X.; Zhao, Y.-T.; Ning, J.; Wang, D.; Su, T. Dynamically Tunable Filtering Attenuator Based on Graphene Integrated Microstrip Resonators. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 5270–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dmitriev, V.; Rodrigues, N.R.N.M.; de Oliveira, R.M.S.; Paiva, R.R. Graphene Rectangular Loop Antenna for Terahertz Communications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 69, 3063–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, Y.; Liu, P.; Yu, D.; Li, G.; Tao, F. Dual-Band Reconfigurable Terahertz Patch Antenna with Graphene-Stack-Based Backing Cavity. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1541–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alharbi, A.G.; Sorathiya, V. Ultra-Wideband Graphene-Based Micro-Sized Circular Patch-Shaped Yagi-like MIMO Antenna for Terahertz Wireless Communication. Electronics 2022, 11, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leng, T.; Pan, K.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Ouslimani, H.; Abdalla, M.A. Dual Band Graphene Nanoflakes Printed Compact Monopole Antenna for Low Cost WIFI Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–12 July 2019; pp. 1287–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, X.; Leng, T.; Pan, K.; Abdalla, M.A.; Hu, Z. Graphene Printed Flexible and Conformal Array Antenna on Paper Substrate for 5.8 GHz Wireless Communications. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–20 March 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, X.; Leng, T.; Pan, K.; Hu, Z.; Abdalla, M. Graphene Printed Antenna Array for Wireless Communication Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (APS/URSI), Singapore, 4–10 December 2021; pp. 1621–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pan, K.; Leng, T.; Jiang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Abdalla, M.A.; Ouslimani, H.; Hu, Z. Graphene Printed UWB Monopole Antenna for Wireless communication applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–12 July 2019; pp. 1739–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lamminen, A.; Arapov, K.; de With, G.; Haque, S.; Sandberg, H.G.O.; Friedrich, H.; Ermolov, V. Graphene-Flakes Printed Wideband Elliptical Dipole Antenna for Low-Cost Wireless Communications Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 1883–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zu, H.-R.; Wu, B.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Zhao, Y.-T.; Song, R.-G.; He, D.-P. Circularly Polarized Wearable Antenna With Low Profile and Low Specific Absorption Rate Using Highly Conductive Graphene Film. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 2354–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sindhu, B.; Kothuru, A.; Sahatiya, P.; Goel, S.; Nandi, S. Laser-Induced Graphene Printed Wearable Flexible Antenna-Based Strain Sensor for Wireless Human Motion Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 3189–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kapetanakis, T.N.; Nikolopoulos, C.D.; Petridis, K.; Vardiambasis, I.O. Wearable Textile Antenna with a Graphene Sheet or Conductive Fabric Patch for the 2.45 GHz Band. Electronics 2021, 10, 2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Jiang, S.; Song, R.; He, D. A Dual-Band Conformal Antenna Based on Highly Conductive Graphene-Assembled Films for 5G WLAN Applications. Materials 2021, 14, 5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weijia, W.; Chao, M.; Xingtang, Z.; Jiajia, S.; Nobutaka, H.; Jiangtao, H.; Mingsheng, X. High-performance printable 2.4 GHz graphene-based antenna using water-transferring technology. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Song, X. Small CPW-fed triple band microstrip monopole antenna for WLAN applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2013, 51, 747–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bag, B.; Biswas, S.; Sarkar, P.P. A wide circularly polarized dual-band isosceles trapezoidal monopole antenna with modified ground plane. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2022, 35, e5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Yin, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, T. Trapezoid UWB antenna with dual band-notched characteristics for WiMAX/WLAN bands. Electron. Lett. 2013, 49, 685–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Balanis, C.-A. Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 1030–1031. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The geometry of the proposed antenna.
Figure 1. The geometry of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 22 05634 g001
Figure 2. Simulated reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna for w4 variations.
Figure 2. Simulated reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna for w4 variations.
Sensors 22 05634 g002
Figure 3. Simulated reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna for w2 variations.
Figure 3. Simulated reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna for w2 variations.
Sensors 22 05634 g003
Figure 4. Simulated reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna for l1 variations.
Figure 4. Simulated reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna for l1 variations.
Sensors 22 05634 g004
Figure 5. The process of recording the geometry of the antenna on the graphene film.
Figure 5. The process of recording the geometry of the antenna on the graphene film.
Sensors 22 05634 g005
Figure 6. Fabricated dual-band graphene antenna.
Figure 6. Fabricated dual-band graphene antenna.
Sensors 22 05634 g006
Figure 7. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna.
Figure 7. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the dual-band graphene antenna.
Sensors 22 05634 g007
Figure 8. Simulated and measured radiation patterns: (a) H-plane 2.6 GHz, (b) E-plane 2.6 GHz, (c) H-plane 5.8 GHz, and (d) E-plane 5.8 GHz.
Figure 8. Simulated and measured radiation patterns: (a) H-plane 2.6 GHz, (b) E-plane 2.6 GHz, (c) H-plane 5.8 GHz, and (d) E-plane 5.8 GHz.
Sensors 22 05634 g008
Figure 9. Simulated current distribution at (a) 2.45 GHz and (b) 5.8 GHz.
Figure 9. Simulated current distribution at (a) 2.45 GHz and (b) 5.8 GHz.
Sensors 22 05634 g009
Table 1. Comparison between reporter works.
Table 1. Comparison between reporter works.
ReferenceFrequenciesGraphene Type/Conductivity or Sheet ResistanceDielectric
[23]2.45 GHz/5.8 GHzFlakes/3 Ω/sqPaper
[24]2.45 GHz/5.8 GHzFlakes/3.5 × 104 S/mPaper
[25]2.45 GHz/5.8 GHzFlakes/3.5 × 104 S/mPaper
[26]4 to 14 GHzFlakes/7.13 × 104 S/mPaper
[27]2.45 GHz/5.8 GHzFlakes/4 Ω/sqKapton HN
[28]5.8 GHzFilm/1.13 × 106 S/mPolydimethylsiloxane
[29]5.8 GHzLIG/7.18 × 102 S/mPolymide
[30]2.45 GHzFilm/0.06 Ω/sqTextile
[31]2.45 GHz/5–7 GHzFilm/1.13 × 105 S/mPolydimethylsiloxane
[32]2.45 GHzFlakes/2.6 Ω/sqGlass
This work2.45 GHz/4–6 GHzFilm/3.7 × 105 S/mGlass
Table 2. Final dimensions of the proposed graphene antenna.
Table 2. Final dimensions of the proposed graphene antenna.
ParameterDimension (mm)ParameterDimension (mm)
L30l17
W30l25
w417.5l0114.1
w29w521
wf2.91w33.1
S01S11
S21
Table 3. Frequency ranges and fractional bandwidth of the dual-band graphene antenna.
Table 3. Frequency ranges and fractional bandwidth of the dual-band graphene antenna.
Frequency RangeFractional Bandwidth
Simulated2.45 GHz4%
Measured2.6 GHz4%
Simulated4.5 to 7.8 GHz53%
Measured4 to 7 GHz54%
Table 4. Measured and simulated gain.
Table 4. Measured and simulated gain.
Frequency (GHz)Gain (dB)
Simulated2.450.38
Measured2.6−0.2
Simulated5.80.765
Measured5.81
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morales-Centla, N.; Torrealba-Melendez, R.; Tamariz-Flores, E.I.; López-López, M.; Arriaga-Arriaga, C.A.; Munoz-Pacheco, J.M.; Gonzalez-Diaz, V.R. Dual-Band CPW Graphene Antenna for Smart Cities and IoT Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 5634. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155634

AMA Style

Morales-Centla N, Torrealba-Melendez R, Tamariz-Flores EI, López-López M, Arriaga-Arriaga CA, Munoz-Pacheco JM, Gonzalez-Diaz VR. Dual-Band CPW Graphene Antenna for Smart Cities and IoT Applications. Sensors. 2022; 22(15):5634. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morales-Centla, Nathaniel, Richard Torrealba-Melendez, Edna Iliana Tamariz-Flores, Mario López-López, Cesar Augusto Arriaga-Arriaga, Jesus M. Munoz-Pacheco, and Victor R. Gonzalez-Diaz. 2022. "Dual-Band CPW Graphene Antenna for Smart Cities and IoT Applications" Sensors 22, no. 15: 5634. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop