A Review of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures and Graphene-Based Sensors for Advanced Corrosion Monitoring
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Forms of Corrosion Commonly Found on Aircrafts
3. Cost of Corrosion and Corrosion Management
4. Corrosion Environments, By-Products and Corrosion Matrix
5. State-of-the-Art Corrosion Sensors
6. Current Field and On-Board Corrosion Monitoring Approaches
7. Implementation of Organic Thin Film Materials in Corrosion Sensing
8. Fiber Optic Based Sensors
8.1. Point-Wise and Quasi-Distributed Fiber Optic Sensors
8.1.1. Backscattering Optical Fiber-Based Sensors
8.1.2. Fiber Grating Optical Fiber-Based Sensors
8.2. Optical Fiber Based Colorimetric Sensors—Phototransistors as a Detection Method
9. Thin Film Chemical Sensors
9.1. Ion Selective Field Effect Transistor
9.2. Ion Selective Probes
9.3. Capacitive Sensors
9.4. pH Sensors
10. Wireless Sensors
10.1. Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors
10.2. Radio Frequency Identification Sensors
10.3. Sensor Nodes
11. Conclusions and Outlook
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Federal Aviation Agency. AC 43-4B. Corrosion Control for Aircraft; Federal Aviation Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
- Czaban, M. Aircraft Corrosion—Review of Corrosion Processes and its Effects in Selected Cases. Fatigue Aircr. Struct. 2018, 2018, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demo, J.; Friedersdorf, F. Aircraft corrosion monitoring and data visualization techniques for condition based maintenance. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 14 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Aviation Safety Network. Available online: https://aviationsafety.net/database/record.php?id=19880428-0 (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Roberge, P. Handbook of Corrosion Engineering; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Branzoi, V.; Golgovici, F.; Branzoi, F. Aluminum corrosion in hydrochloric acid solutions and the effect of some organic inhibitors. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2003, 78, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, M.; Bellinger, N.; Komorowski, J.P.; Rutledge, B.; Hiscocks, R. Corrosion fatigue prediction using holistic life assessment methodology. In Proceedings of the 8th International Fatigue Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, 3–7 June 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, M. Corrosion Damage Atlas for Aircraft Corrosion Management and Structural Integrity Assessment. In Proceedings of the NATO RTO STO-MP-AVT-303 Corrosion Management, Athens, Greece, 10–14 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Craig, B.; Lane, R.; Rose, D. Corrosion Prevention and Control: A Program Management Guide for Selecting Materials; NSN-7540-01-280-5500; Advanced Materials, Manufacturing, and Testing Information Analysis Center (AMMTIAC), Alion Science & Technology: McLean, VA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Logistics Management Institute (LMI). Estimated Impact of Corrosion on Cost and Availability of DoD Weapon Systems—FY18 Update; Logistics Management Institute (LMI): Tysons, VA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Logistics Management Institute (LMI). Estimated Impact of Corrosion on Cost and Availability of DoD Weapon Systems—FY17 Update; Logistics Management Institute (LMI): Tysons, VA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Herzberg, E.; Stroh, R. The Impact of Corrosion on Cost and Availability of U.S. Department of Defense Weapon Systems. In Proceedings of the NATO RTO STO-MP-AVT-303 Corrosion Management, Athens, Greece, 10–14 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wright, R.F.; Lu, P.; Devkota, J.; Lu, F.; Ziomek-Moroz, M.; Ohodnicki, P.R. Corrosion Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Oil and Natural Gas Infrastructure: A Review. Sensors 2019, 19, 3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Es, J.J.H.M.; ’t Hoen-Velterop, L. Lessons Learned from Operating a Composite Helicopter in Maritime Environment. In Proceedings of the NATO RTO STO-MP-AVT-303 Corrosion Management, Athens, Greece, 10–14 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Vautey, P. Corrosion Management at Dassault-Aviation Challenges & Perspectives. In Proceedings of the NATO RTO STO-MP-AVT-303 Corrosion Management, Athens, Greece, 10–14 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Wu, F.; Zhao, W.; Ghaffari, M.; Liao, L.; Siegel, D. Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2014, 42, 314–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Fan, W. A method of atmospheric corrosion prediction for aircraft structure. Mater. Corros. 2018, 70, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Molent, L.; Barter, S.; Wanhill, R. The decoupling of corrosion and fatigue for aircraft service life management. In Proceedings of the 34th ICAF Conference and 28th ICAF Symposium, ICAF 2015, Helsinki, Finland, 1–5 June 2015; pp. 1062–1073. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, B.; Wright, R.J.; Agnew, L.; Friedersdorf, F. Measurement and prediction of aerospace corrosion rate using real-time sensor measurements and machine learning approaches. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2020, June 2020. physical event cancelled. [Google Scholar]
- Summitt, R.; Fink, F.T. PACER LIME: An Environmental Corrosion Severity Classification System. AFWAL-TR-80-4102 Part I; DTIC Doc.: AD-A100496; Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, N.; Clark, B.; Kramer, P.; Co, N.E.; Friedersdorf, F.; Burns, J. Corrosion modified fatigue analysis for next-generation damage-tolerant management. Corros. Rev. 2019, 37, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, W.; Hoeppner, D.W.; Kandachar, P.V. AGARD Corrosion Handbook. Volume 1, Aircraft Corrosion: Causes and Case Histories; AGARD-AG-278 Vol 1; DTIC Doc.: AD-A160 638; Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Specialized Printing Services Limited: Essex, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9223:2012. Corrosion of Metals and Alloys—Corrosivity of Atmospheres—Classification, Determination and Estimation; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Corrosion Fatigue and Environmentally Assisted Cracking in Aging Military Vehicles; AG-AVT-140, NATO-RTO report; North Atlantic Treaty Organisation: Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France, 2011; ISBN 978-92-837-0125-5. [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik, Y.; Jawalkar, C.S.; Kant, S. A Review on use of Aluminium Alloys in Aircraft Components. i-Manager’s J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 3, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
- Noel, J.J. The Electrochemistry of Titanium Corrosion. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Knight, S.; Neil, W.; Du Plessis, A.; Davenport, A.; Trueman, A. Understanding the effect of wet and dry cycles on the atmospheric corrosion of aluminium alloys. In Proceedings of the 18th International Corrosion Congress, Perth, Australia, 20–24 November 2011; pp. 525–536. [Google Scholar]
- Tullmin, M.; Roberge, P.R.; Klassen, R.D.; Little, M.A. Prediction of aircraft corrosion damage—Atmospheric parameters and corrosivity sensors. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 98, San Diego, CA, USA, 22–27 March 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, N.; Trueman, A. Synergistic prognostic modeling of atmospheric corrosion for condition-based maintenance. In Proceedings of the Australasian Corrosion Association’s Annual Conference: Corrosion and Prevention 2019, Melbourne, Australia, 24–27 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gale, W.F.; Totemeier, T.C. Intergranular Corrosion. In Smithells Metals Reference Book; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Papavinasam, S. Mechanisms. In Corrosion Control in the Oil and Gas Industry; Elsevier Science & Technology: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 249–300. [Google Scholar]
- Graig, B.D.; Lane, R.A.; Rose, D.H. Corrosion Prevention and Control: A Program Management Guide for Material Selection; AMMTIAC: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Speight, J.G. Corrosion Monitoring. In Handbook of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; p. 241. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.G. Corrosion Potential and Corrosion Current. In Corrosion and Electrochemistry of Zinc; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 125–156. [Google Scholar]
- Yoo, Y.-H.; Nam, T.-H.; Choi, Y.-S.; Kim, J.-G.; Chung, L. A galvanic sensor system for detecting the corrosion damage of the steel embedded in concrete structures: Laboratory tests to determine the cathodic protection and stray-current. Met. Mater. Int. 2011, 17, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, S.J.; Hebbron, M.; Mishon, M. Corrosion Sensors to Reduce Aircraft Maintenance. In Proceedings of the NATO RTO-STO-MP-AVT-144, Vilnius, Lithuania, 3–5 October 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Makhlouf, A.S.H.; Botello, M.A. Failure of the metallic structures due to microbiologically induced corrosion and the techniques for protection. In Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, D.-H.; Song, S.; Qin, Z.; Hu, W.; Behnamian, Y. Review—Electrochemical Probes and Sensors Designed for Time-Dependent Atmospheric Corrosion Monitoring: Fundamentals, Progress, and Challenges. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wandelt, K. Biocorrosion-Steel. In Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry: Surface Science and Electrochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 7, pp. 28–42. [Google Scholar]
- Rivadeneyra, A.; López-Villanueva, J.A. Recent Advances in Printed Capacitive Sensors. Micromachines 2020, 11, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mendoza, E.A.; Khalil, A.N.; Sun, Z.; Robinson, D.P.; Syracuse, S.J.; Egalon, C.O.; Gunther, M.F.; Lieberman, R.A. Embeddable Distributed Moisture and pH Sensors for Nondestructive Inspection of Aircraft LAP Joints. In Proceedings of the Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Infrastructure, Oakland, CA, USA, 6–7 June 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Basic of RFID System—Types and Working Example of RFID Application. ElProCus, 3 June 2020. Available online: http://www.elprocus.com/rfid-basic-introduction-simple-application/ (accessed on 18 January 2021).
- Speight, J.G. Corrosion Monitoring and Control. In Oil and Gas Corrosion Prevention: From Surface Facilities to Refineries; Elsevier Science & Technology: Watham, MA, USA, 18 March 2014; pp. 142–185. [Google Scholar]
- Salvo, P.; Melai, B.; Calisi, N.; Paoletti, C.; Bellagambi, F.; Kirchhain, A.; Trivella, M.; Fuoco, R.; Francesco, F.D. Graphene-based devices for measuring pH. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 976–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Hintze, P.; Calle, L.M.; Buhrow, J.; Curran, J.; Muehlberg, A.J.; Gelling, V.J.; Webster, D.C.; Croll, S.G.; Contu, F.; et al. Smart coating for corrosion indication and prevention: Recent progress. In Proceedings of the NACE—International Corrosion Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 22–26 March 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Aircraft Structures NDT with ET Arrays. Resource Center—JENTEK Sensors, Inc. 2019. Available online: https://www.jenteksensors.com/resourcecenter-presentations.php (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- System for Real-Time Monitoring of Outdoor Corrosivity and Air Quality. AirCorr O, Institut de la Corrosion. Available online: https://www.institut-corrosion.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AirCorr-O-Technical-sheet-v2016.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- Gloria, N.; Areiza, M.; Miranda, I.; Rebello, J. Development of a magnetic sensor for detection and sizing of internal pipeline corrosion defects. NDT E Int. 2009, 42, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corrosion Management and Monitoring Systems. Luna. Available online: https://lunainc.com/lunalabs/corrosion-management-and-monitoring-systems (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- Sensing and Non-Destructive Test Products. Luna. Available online: https://lunainc.com/product-category/sensing-and-non-destructive-test-products?family=80#category-13. (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- Humidity and Temperature Sensor, SHT1x (SHT10, SHT11, SHT15). Senserion, The Sensor Company, 2010. Available online: https://datasheet.octopart.com/SHT15-Sensirion-datasheet-17593114.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- Wang, B.B.; Wang, Z.Y.; Han, W.; Ke, W. Atmospheric corrosion of aluminium alloy 2024-T3 exposed to salt lake environment in Western China. Corros. Sci. 2012, 59, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamarreño, C.R.; Rivero, P.J.; Hernaez, M.; Goicoechea, J.; Matías, I.R.; Arregui, F.J. Optical Sensors for Corrosion Monitoring. In Intelligent Coatings for Corrosion Control; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 603–640. [Google Scholar]
- Rinaldi, G.; Huber, T.; Mcintosh, H.; Lebrun, L.; Ding, H.; Weber, J. Corrosion Sensor Development for Condition-Based Maintenance of Aircraft. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2012, 2012, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prosa, M.; Bolognesi, M.; Fornasari, L.; Grasso, G.; Lopez-Sanchez, L.; Marabelli, F.; Toffanin, S. Nanostructured Organic/Hybrid Materials and Components in Miniaturized Optical and Chemical Sensors. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, M.; Hou, S.; Yu, X.; Yu, J. Recent progress in chemical gas sensors based on organic thin film transistors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13482–13500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.-H.; Bao, D.-D.; Liu, H.; Zhang, D.-Q.; Wang, N.; Li, H.-T. Functionalization of Graphene and Applications of the Derivatives. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2017, 27, 1129–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coroş, M.; Pruneanu, S.; Stefan-van Staden, R.-I. Review—Recent Progress in the Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nag, A.; Mitra, A.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C. Graphene and its sensor-based applications: A review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 270, 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, X.J.; Hiew, B.Y.; Lai, K.C.; Lee, L.Y.; Gan, S.; Thangalazhy-Gopakumar, S.; Rigby, S. Review on graphene and its derivatives: Synthesis methods and potential industrial implementation. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 98, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bleu, Y.; Bourquard, F.; Tite, T.; Loir, A.-S.; Maddi, C.; Donnet, C.; Garrelie, F. Review of Graphene Growth From a Solid Carbon Source by Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD). Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zaaba, N.I.; Foo, K.L.; Hashim, U.; Tan, S.J.; Liu, W.-W.; Voon, C.H. Synthesis of graphene OXIDE using MODIFIED Hummers METHOD: Solvent Influence. Procedia Eng. 2017, 184, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Yin, Z.; Wu, S.; Qi, X.; He, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, Q.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene-Based Materials: Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, and Applications. Small 2011, 7, 1876–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavinkumar, T.; Sastikumar, D.; Manivannan, S. Effect of functional groups on dielectric, optical gas sensing properties of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 10816–10825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, S.; Cheng, H.-M. The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 2012, 50, 3210–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.-S.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, Y.-S. NH 3 gas sensing properties of a gas sensor based on fluorinated graphene oxide. Colloids Surf. A Phys. Eng. Asp. 2016, 490, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chronopoulos, D.D.; Bakandritsos, A.; Pykal, M.; Zbořil, R.; Otyepka, M. Chemistry, properties, and applications of fluorographene. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 9, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F.-G.; Zhao, G.; Liu, X.-H.; Ge, C.-W.; Wang, J.-T.; Li, B.-L.; Wang, Q.-G.; Li, W.-S.; Chen, Q.-Y. Fluorinated graphene: Facile solution preparation and tailorable properties by fluorine-content tuning. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 8782–8789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlický, F.; Kumara Ramanatha Datta, K.; Otyepka, M.; Zbořil, R. Halogenated Graphenes: Rapidly Growing Family of Graphene Derivatives. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6434–6464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbanová, V.; Karlický, F.; Matěj, A.; Šembera, F.; Janoušek, Z.; Perman, J.A.; Ranc, V.; Čépe, K.; Michl, J.; Otyepka, M.; et al. Fluorinated graphenes as advanced biosensors—effect of fluorine coverage on electron transfer properties and adsorption of biomolecules. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 12134–12142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, G.; Ocola, L.E.; Chen, J. Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 445502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, W.; Wu, C.; Chang, Y.; Cheng, H.; Yu, C. Solvent-free preparation of hydrophilic fluorinated graphene oxide modified with amino-groups. Mater. Lett. 2019, 237, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alrammouz, R.; Podlecki, J.; Vena, A.; Garcia, R.; Abboud, P.; Habchi, R.; Sorli, B. Highly porous and flexible capacitive humidity sensor based on self-assembled graphene oxide sheets on a paper substrate. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 298, 126892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, X.; Liu, Y.; Peng, L.; Pang, J.; Xu, Z.; Gao, C.; Xie, J. Surface acoustic wave humidity sensors based on uniform and thickness controllable graphene oxide thin films formed by surface tension. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2019, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, X.; Leng, T.; Georgiou, T.; Abraham, J.; Nair, R.R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Hu, Z. Graphene Oxide Dielectric Permittivity at GHz and Its Applications for Wireless Humidity Sensing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, G.; Tan, Q.; Kou, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Lv, W.; Dong, H.; Xiong, J. A Flexible Temperature Sensor Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide for Robot Skin Used in Internet of Things. Sensors 2018, 18, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alves, A.P.; Meireles, L.M.; Ferrari, G.A.; Cunha, T.H.R.; Paraense, M.O.; Campos, L.C.; Lacerda, R.G. Highly sensitive and reusable ion-sensor based on functionalized graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 033105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagliazucchi, M.; Szleifer, I. Transport mechanisms in nanopores and nanochannels: Can we mimic nature? Mater. Today 2015, 18, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, Z.; Qiu, H.; Guo, W. Electrically Tunable Ion Selectivity of Charged Nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 29380–29385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, P.; Lalam, N.; Badar, M.; Liu, B.; Chorpening, B.T.; Buric, M.P.; Ohodnicki, P.R. Distributed optical fiber sensing: Review and perspective. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019, 6, 041302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Liao, G.; Jin, S.; Cao, D.; Wei, Q.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Cai, X.; Tan, S.; Xiao, Y.; et al. All-fiber-optic temperature sensor based on reduced graphene oxide. Laser Phys. Lett. 2014, 11, 035901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, K.; Elster, J.; Jones, M.; Kelly, R. Optical fiber-based corrosion sensor systems for health monitoring of aging aircraft. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Autotestcon Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37237), Valley Forge, PA, USA, 20–23 August 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, M.-J.; Gu, B.; An, Q.-F.; Yang, C.; Guan, Y.L.; Yong, K.-T. Recent development of fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors: Mechanisms, materials, micro/nano-fabrications and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 376, 348–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, A.; Wu, Y.; Yao, B.; Gong, Y. Optimization study on graphene-coated microfiber Bragg grating structures for ammonia gas sensing. Photonic Sens. 2014, 5, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Im, H.; Hong, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, H.; Kim, S. Colorimetric Sensing Systems: A Colorimetric Multifunctional Sensing Method for Structural-Durability-Health Monitoring Systems. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1970163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Priere, A. Printed Organic Thin Film Transistors, Photodiodes, and Phototransistors for Sensing and Imaging; Department of Elecetrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- De Sanctis, A.; Mehew, J.; Craciun, M.; Russo, S. Graphene-Based Light Sensing: Fabrication, Characterisation, Physical Properties and Performance. Materials 2018, 1, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Norris, T.B.; Zhong, Z. Graphene photodetectors with ultra-broadband and high responsivity at room temperature. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Georgiou, T.; Jalil, R.; Belle, B.D.; Britnell, L.; Gorbachev, R.V.; Morozov, S.V.; Kim, Y.-J.; Gholinia, A.; Haigh, S.J.; Makarovsky, O.; et al. Vertical field-effect transistor based on graphene–WS2 heterostructures for flexible and transparent electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 8, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakih, I.; Durnan, O.; Mahvash, F.; Napal, I.; Centeno, A.; Zurutuza, A.; Yargeau, V.; Szkopek, T. Selective ion sensing with high resolution large area graphene field effect transistor arrays. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbari, E.; Moradi, R.; Afroozeh, A.; Alizadeh, A.; Nilashi, M. A new approach for prediction of graphene based ISFET using regression tree and neural network. Superlattices Microstruct. 2019, 130, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, J.R. pH Electrodes, Ion-Selective Electrodes, and Oxygen Sensors: Electrochemical Sensors Used in the Medical Field. Lab. Med. 2003, 34, 544–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, R.; Qiu, S.; Tong, L.; Qian, Y. Review of progresses on clinical applications of ion selective electrodes for electrolytic ion tests: From conventional ISEs to graphene-based ISEs. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 2016, 28, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, C.-Y.; Lee, G.-B. Humidity Sensors: A Review. Sens. Lett. 2005, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Shi, J.; Pang, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, X. Graphene Channel Liquid Container Field Effect Transistor as pH Sensor. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mailly-Giacchetti, B.; Hsu, A.; Wang, H.; Vinciguerra, V.; Pappalardo, F.; Occhipinti, L.; Guidetti, E.; Coffa, S.; Kong, J.; Palacios, T. pH sensing properties of graphene solution-gated field-effect transistors. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 084505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Wang, C.; Petrone, N.; Yu, J.; Nuckolls, C.; Hone, J.; Lin, Q. A solid-gated graphene fet sensor for PH measurements. In Proceedings of the 2015 28th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Estoril, Portugal, 18–22 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ameri, S.K.; Singh, P.K.; Sonkusale, S.R. Three dimensional graphene transistor for ultra-sensitive pH sensing directly in biological media. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 934, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Go, D.B.; Atashbar, M.Z.; Ramshani, Z.; Chang, H.-C. Surface acoustic wave devices for chemical sensing and microfluidics: A review and perspective. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 4112–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraga, M.A.; Furlan, H.; Pessoa, R.S.; Massi, M. Wide bandgap semiconductor thin films for piezoelectric and piezoresistive MEMS sensors applied at high temperatures: An overview. Microsyst. Technol. 2013, 20, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greve, D.; Chin, T.-L.; Zheng, P.; Ohodnicki, P.; Baltrus, J.; Oppenheim, I. Surface Acoustic Wave Devices for Harsh Environment Wireless Sensing. Sensors 2013, 13, 6910–6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aubert, T.; Elmazria, O.; Assouar, M. Wireless and batteryless surface acoustic wave sensors for high temperature environments. In Proceedings of the 2009 9th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, Beijing, China, 16–19 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.-J.; Yook, J.-G. Graphene Nanomaterials-Based Radio-Frequency/Microwave Biosensors for Biomaterials Detection. Materials 2019, 12, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wilson, W.C.; Atkinson, G.M. Wireless sensor applications in extreme aeronautical environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments, Baltimore, MD, USA, 7–9 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, J.; Beirne, S.; Lau, K.-T.; Diamond, D. Evaluation of a low-cost wireless chemical sensor network for environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Sensors, Lecce, Italy, 26–29 October 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Acharyya, D.; Bhattacharyya, P. Functionalization of Graphene and Its Derivatives for Developing Efficient Solid-State Gas Sensors: Trends and Challenges. Mater. Horiz. Nat. Nanomater. 2020, 245–284. [Google Scholar]
- Moldovan, O.; Iñiguez, B.; Deen, M.J.; Marsal, L.F. Graphene electronic sensors—Review of recent developments and future challenges. IET Circuitsdevices Amp. Syst. 2015, 9, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, L.-Y.; Yin, M.-J.; Tam, H.-Y.; Albert, J. Fiber Optic pH Sensor with Self-Assembled Polymer Multilayer Nanocoatings. Sensors 2013, 13, 1425–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Form of Corrosion | Definitions | When to Consider | Influencing Factors |
---|---|---|---|
Uniform (general) | A form of corrosion that occurs uniformly over the entire exposed surface of a metal. | Susceptible alloys | pH, temperature, ionic pollutants, aeration, uniformity and adherence of scale surface finish |
Pitting | A form of localized corrosion that occurs when a corrosive environment medium attacks a metal at specific points and results in deep cavities in the metal. This is one of the most widespread and detrimental forms of electromechanical deterioration | Aluminum, stainless steel and other alloys in aircraft structures, in particular Al 7000 series | Surface finish including flaws and cracks, stagnant fluids, ionic potential of the electrolytes |
Crevice | A form of corrosion that occurs when an electrolyte becomes trapped and stagnant, in particular locations such as joints, corners, and under debris. | Joints, corners, and where debris may accumulate | Stagnation of pollutants due to poor fluid flow results in excessive ions available to precipitate corrosion reactions |
Galvanic | A form of corrosion resulting from the formation of a galvanic cell by the galvanic coupling of dissimilar metals (metals having different electrical potentials), which are exposed to an electrolyte. | Two dissimilar metals in direct contact or separated but in electrical contact, such as carbon/Al, or aluminum joints with steel bolts | Dissimilar corrosion potentials between adjacent materials, ratio of exposed anodic and cathodic materials, pH, aeration, and temperature |
Erosion Corrosion | The increased rate of deterioration and loss of a material due to the combined effects of corrosion and the repeated motion of the surrounding environment such as repeated impacts from hard particles. | Moving corrosive environment or erosive hard particles or liquid. | Turbulent flow, fluid velocity, density, angle of impact, cavitation |
Intergranular | A form of corrosion that attacks grain boundaries in materials. It may occur as a result of a galvanic couple between differing phases within a material. It is also associated with the propagation of pitting and exfoliation corrosion | Susceptible alloy/heat treatments | Alloying content impurities within the metal, heat treatment, welding effects, 2nd phase precipitation products on grain boundaries |
Stress corrosion cracking | A cracking process involving the combined factors of corrosive environment and a sustained tensile stress. | Static stresses | Tensile stress (applied mechanical or thermal, residual), |
Fretting Corrosion | A form of corrosion caused by repetitive friction between two surfaces in sliding motion with respect to each other while exposed to a corrosive environment. | Small relative movement between two metals typically caused by vibration or repeated thermal expansion and contraction cycles | Vibratory movement between adjacent loaded components |
Corrosion fatigue | The failure of a material due to the combined effects of corrosion and fatigue (cyclic stressing). | Cyclic stresses | Cyclic load |
Hydrogen damage | Any deterioration of a material due to the presence of hydrogen, whether in the surrounding environment or internal to the material. | Hydrogen generation during processing or in service directly or indirectly, in particular, landing gear and engine components | High temperature moist environments, electrolysis, hydrogen evolved from other corrosion mechanisms |
Exfoliation | A form of corrosion that occurs in bands on the interior of the metal that is parallel to the metal’s surface. This consequently forms corrosion products that cause separation of the metal into layers. It is often considered a form of intergranular corrosion that attacks metals that have been mechanically treated to form elongated grain structures in one direction. | Rolled and extruded alloys susceptible to intergranular corrosion | Similar to intergranular |
Filiform corrosion | A form of corrosion that exists under organic and metallic coatings on metals, blistering the coating, and is characterized by hairline resemblance. | Thin permeable organic coatings on metals | Water permeable organic coatings or edges of alloys coated with metallic coatings exposed to high humidity |
Corrosion Factors | Sensors | Description | Pros and Cons |
---|---|---|---|
Physical |
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
| |
Chemical |
|
|
Sensor | Sensor Type | Parameter | Sensitivity | Detection Limit | Response Time/Speed | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optical | Side Polished Fiber (SPF) | Temperature | 0.134 dB/°C | 0.9 °C | 0.0228 °C s−1 | [81] |
FBG | NH3 | 0.003–0.008 dB/ppm | Not provided | 10 s | [84,108] | |
Potentio-metric | ISFET | Cl−, Na+, SO42−, K+, NH4+ | 2 × 10−3 log | 10−5 M | Not provided | [90] |
pH | 34.5–57.5% (MG) 4.75% (FLG) 22 mV/pH (CVD) 71 ± 7 mV/pH (HfO2) | Not provided | <4 s | [95,96,98] | ||
ISE | K+ | 59.2 mV/decade aK+ | 10−5 M | <10 s | [93] | |
Capacitive | Capacitive Chemical Sensor | Moisture | 5.65 fF/%RH | Not provided | Not provided | [73] |
Frequency | SAW | RH | 25.3 kHz/%RH | Not provided | <10 s | [74] |
Phase | RFID | RH | 0.5°/1%RH | Not provided | Not provided | [75] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, L.; Chakik, M.; Prakash, R. A Review of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures and Graphene-Based Sensors for Advanced Corrosion Monitoring. Sensors 2021, 21, 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092908
Li L, Chakik M, Prakash R. A Review of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures and Graphene-Based Sensors for Advanced Corrosion Monitoring. Sensors. 2021; 21(9):2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092908
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Lucy, Mounia Chakik, and Ravi Prakash. 2021. "A Review of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures and Graphene-Based Sensors for Advanced Corrosion Monitoring" Sensors 21, no. 9: 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092908
APA StyleLi, L., Chakik, M., & Prakash, R. (2021). A Review of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures and Graphene-Based Sensors for Advanced Corrosion Monitoring. Sensors, 21(9), 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092908